Response of Anatidae Abundance to Environmental Factors in the Middle and Lower Yangtze River Floodplain, China
Abstract
:1. Introduction
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Study Area
2.2. Census Data
2.3. Environmental Data
2.4. Statistical Analysis
3. Results
3.1. Population Trends
3.2. Impacts of Habitat-Related Variables
3.3. Effects of Climatic Variables
4. Discussion
Supplementary Materials
Author Contributions
Funding
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of Interest
References
- De Boer, W.F.; van Langevelde, F.; Prins, H.H.; de Ruiter, P.C.; Blanc, J.; Vis, M.J.; Gaston, K.J.; Hamilton, I.D. Understanding spatial differences in African elephant densities and occurrence, a continent-wide analysis. Biol. Conserv. 2013, 159, 468–476. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wen, L.; Rogers, K.; Saintilan, N.; Ling, J. The influences of climate and hydrology on population dynamics of waterbirds in the lower Murrumbidgee River floodplains in Southeast Australia: Implications for environmental water management. Ecol. Model. 2011, 222, 154–163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pavón-Jordán, D.; Fox, A.D.; Clausen, P.; Dagys, M.; Deceuninck, B.; Devos, K.; Hearn, R.D.; Holt, C.A.; Hornman, M.; Keller, V.; et al. Climate-driven changes in winter abundance of a migratory waterbird in relation to EU protected areas. Divers. Distrib. 2015, 21, 571–582. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cao, L.; Fox, A.D. Birds and people both depend on China’s wetlands. Nature 2009, 460, 173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cao, L.; Zhang, Y.; Barter, M.; Lei, G. Anatidae in eastern China during the non-breeding season: Geographical distributions and protection status. Biol. Conserv. 2010, 143, 650–659. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jia, Q.; Koyama, K.; Choi, C.Y.; Kim, H.J.; Cao, L.; Gao, D.; Liu, G.; Fox, A.D. Population estimates and geographical distributions of swans and geese in East Asia based on counts during the non-breeding season. Bird Conserv. Int. 2016, 26, 397–417. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- De Boer, W.F.; Cao, L.; Barter, M.; Wang, X.; Sun, M.; Van Oeveren, H.; De Leeuw, J.; Barzen, J.; Prins, H.H.T. Comparing the community composition of European and Eastern Chinese waterbirds and the influence of human factors on the China waterbird community. Ambio 2011, 40, 68–77. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, Y.; Jia, Q.; Prins, H.H.T.; Cao, L.; De Boer, W.F. Individual-area relationship best explains goose species density in wetlands. PLoS ONE 2015, 10, e0124972. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Guan, L.; Lei, J.; Zuo, A.; Zhang, H.; Lei, G.; Wen, L. Optimizing the timing of water level recession for conservation of wintering geese in Dongting Lake, China. Ecol. Eng. 2016, 88, 90–98. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, Y.; Jia, Q.; Prins, H.; Cao, L.; de Boer, W. Effect of conservation efforts and ecological variables on waterbird population sizes in wetlands of the Yangtze River. Sci. Rep. 2015, 5, 17136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, Y.; Cao, L.; Barter, M.; Fox, A.D.; Zhao, M.; Meng, F.; Shi, H.; Jiang, Y.; Zhu, W. Changing distribution and abundance of Swan Goose Anser cygnoides in the Yangtze River floodplain: The likely loss of a very important wintering site. Bird Conserv. Int. 2011, 21, 36–48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fox, A.D.; Cao, L.; Zhang, Y.; Barter, M.; Zhao, M.J.; Meng, F.J.; Wang, S.L. Declines in the tuber-feeding waterbird guild at Shengjin Lake National Nature Reserve, China—A barometer of submerged macrophyte collapse. Aquat. Conserv. Mar. Freshw. Ecosyst. 2011, 21, 82–91. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Si, Y.; Skidmore, A.K.; Wang, T.; de Boer, W.F.; Toxopeus, A.G.; Schlerf, M.; Oudshoorn, M.; Zwerver, S.; Jeugd, H.V.D.; Exo, K.M.; et al. Distribution of barnacle geese Branta leucops is in relation to food resources, distance to roosts, and the location of refuges. Ardea 2011, 99, 217–226. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Koh, C.N.; Lee, P.F.; Lin, R.S. Bird species richness patterns of northern Taiwan: Primary productivity, human population density, and habitat heterogeneity. Divers. Distrib. 2006, 12, 546–554. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Heuermann, N.; van Langevelde, F.; van Wieren, S.E.; Prins, H.H. Increased searching and handling effort in tall swards lead to a Type IV functional response in small grazing herbivores. Oecologia 2011, 166, 659–669. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Bos, D.; Van De Koppel, J.; Weissing, F.J. Dark-bellied brent geese aggregate to cope with increased levels of primary production. Oikos 2004, 107, 485–496. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Searle, K.R.; Vandervelde, T.; Hobbs, N.T.; Shipley, L.A. Gain functions for large herbivores: Tests of alternative models. J. Anim. Ecol. 2005, 74, 181–189. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shipley, L.A. The influence of bite size on foraging at larger spatial and temporal scales by mammalian herbivores. Oikos 2007, 116, 1964–1974. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tews, J.; Brose, U.; Grimm, V.; Tielborger, K.; Wichmann, M.C.; Schwager, M.; Jeltsch, F. Animal species diversity driven by habitat heterogeneity/diversity: The importance of keystone structures. J. Biogeogr. 2004, 31, 79–92. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Meehan, T.D.; Jetz, W.; Brown, J.H. Energetic determinants of abundance in winter landbird communities. Ecol. Lett. 2004, 7, 532–537. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Root, T. Energy Constraints on Avian Distributions and Abundances. Ecology 1988, 69, 330–339. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Milchunas, D.G.; Lauenroth, W.K. Quantitative effects of grazing on vegetation and soils over a global range of environments. Ecol. Monogr. 1993, 63, 327–366. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nolet, B.A.; Fuld, V.N.; van Rijswijk, M.E.C. Foraging costs and accessibility as determinants of giving-up densities in a swan-pondweed system. Oikos 2006, 112, 353–362. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zenzal, T.J.; Contina, A.J.; Kelly, J.F.; Moore, F.R. Temporal migration patterns between natal locations of ruby-throated hummingbirds (Archilochus colubris) and their Gulf Coast stopover site. Mov. Ecol. 2018, 6, 2. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- La Sorte, F.A.; Tingley, M.W.; Hurlbert, A.H. The role of urban and agricultural areas during avian migration: An assessment of within-year temporal turnover. Glob. Ecol. Biogeogr. 2014, 23, 1225–1234. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Qi, S.; Brown, D.G.; Tian, Q.; Jiang, L.; Zhao, T.; Bergen, K.M. Inundation Extent and Flood Frequency Mapping Using LANDSAT Imagery and Digital Elevation Models. GIsci. Remote Sens. 2009, 46, 101–127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Huang, Q.; Sun, Z.; Opp, C.; Lotz, T.; Jiang, J.; Lai, X. Hydrological Drought at Dongting Lake: Its Detection, Characterization, and Challenges Associated With Three Gorges Dam in Central Yangtze, China. Water Resour. Manag. 2014, 28, 5377–5388. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bibby, C.J. Bird Census Techniques; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2000; ISBN 0120958317. [Google Scholar]
- Wood, K.A.; Stillman, R.A.; Coombs, T.; Mcdonald, C.; Daunt, F.; O’Hare, M.T. The role of season and social grouping on habitat use by Mute Swans (Cygnus olor ) in a lowland river catchment. Bird Study 2013, 60, 229–237. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Barter, M.; Cao, L.; Chen, L.; Lei, G. Results of a survey for waterbirds in the lower Yangtze floodplain, China, in January-February 2004. Forktail 2005, 21, 1–7. [Google Scholar]
- Claverie, M.; Vermote, E.F.; Franch, B.; Masek, J.G. Evaluation of the Landsat-5 TM and Landsat-7 ETM+surface reflectance products. Remote Sens. Environ. 2015, 169, 390–403. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Scaramuzza, P.; Micijevic, E.; Chander, G. SLC Gap-Filled Products Phase one Methodology. 2004. Available online: https://landsat.usgs.gov/sites/default/files/documents/SLC_Gap_Fill_Methodology.pdf (accessed on 10 September 2014).
- Mantero, P.; Moser, G.; Serpico, S.B. Partially supervised classification of remote sensing images through SVM-based probability density estimation. IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens. 2005, 43, 559–570. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Joseph, L.N.; Elkin, C.; Martin, T.G.; Possingham, H.P. Modeling abundance using N-mixture models: The importance of considering ecological mechanisms. Ecol. Appl. 2009, 19, 631–642. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Whittingham, M.J.; Stephens, P.A.; Bradbury, R.B.; Freckleton, R.P. Why do we still use stepwise modelling in ecology and behaviour? J. Anim. Ecol. 2006, 75, 1182–1189. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- R Core Team. R Foundation for Statistical Computing. 2016. Available online: https://www.R-project.org/ (accessed on 15 August 2016).
- Rigby, R.A.; Stasinopoulos, D.M.; Akantziliotou, C. A framework for modelling overdispersed count data, including the Poisson-shifted generalized inverse Gaussian distribution. Comput. Stat. Data Anal. 2008, 53, 381–393. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- State Forestry Administration. Outcomes of the second national wetland resource survey. L. Green. 2014, 2, 6–7. [Google Scholar]
- Ministry of Ecology and Environmental of PRC List of Natural Reserves. Available online: http://www.mee.gov.cn/stbh/zrbhq/qgzrbhqml/201611/P020161125559865886359.pdf (accessed on 8 November 2016).
- Zhao, M.; Cong, P.; Barter, M.; Fox, A.D.; Cao, L. The changing abundance and distribution of Greater White-fronted Geese Anser albifrons in the Yangtze River floodplain: Impacts of recent hydrological changes. Bird Conserv. Int. 2012, 22, 135–143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Wang, X.; Fox, A.D.; Cong, P.; Cao, L. Food constraints explain the restricted distribution of wintering Lesser White-fronted Geese Anser erythropus in China. IBIS 2013, 155, 576–592. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhao, M.; Cao, L.; Klaassen, M.; Zhang, Y.; Fox, A.D. Avoiding Competition? Site Use, Diet and Foraging Behaviours in Two Similarly Sized Geese Wintering in China. Ardea 2015, 103, 27–39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Connor, E.F.; Courtney, A.C.; Yoder, J.M.; Mar, N.; Connor, E.; Yder, J.M. Individuals-Area Relationships: The Relationship between Animal Population Density and Area. Ecology 2007, 81, 734–748. [Google Scholar]
- Bell, R.H.V. The use of the herb layer by grazing ungulates in the Serengeti. In Animal Populations in Relation to Their Food Resources; Blackwell Scientific: Oxford, UK, 1970; Volume 10, pp. 111–124. [Google Scholar]
- Jarman, P. The social organisation of antelope in relation to their ecology. Behaviour 1974, 48, 215–267. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Fleishman, E.; Ray, C.; Sjögren-Gulve, P.; Boggs, C.L.; Murphy, D.D. Assessing the roles of patch quality, area, and isolation in predicting metapopulation dynamics. Conserv. Biol. 2002, 706–716. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Prugh, L.R.; Hodges, K.E.; Sinclair, A.R.E.; Brasharesa, J.S. Effect of habitat area and isolation on fragmented animal populations. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2008, 105, 20770–20775. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
Predictor | Estimate | Standard Error | t-Value | p | Model Performance | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Global Deviance | GAIC | Pseudo R2 | |||||
Tundra Swan | |||||||
(Intercept) | 60.69 | 29.24 | 2.08 | 0.04 * | |||
Year | −0.03 | 0.01 | −1.85 | 0.07 | |||
Precipitation | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.31 | 0.76 | 4492.74 | 4582.03 | 0.46 |
Swan goose | |||||||
(Intercept) | 488.73 | 61.19 | 7.99 | 0.00 ** | |||
Year | −0.24 | 0.03 | −7.91 | 0.00 ** | |||
Temperature | −0.05 | 0.07 | −0.67 | 0.51 | 4360.53 | 4462.05 | 0.38 |
Bean goose | |||||||
(Intercept) | 6.49 | 0.23 | 28.39 | 0.00 ** | |||
NDVI CV | −0.05 | 0.06 | −0.76 | 0.45 | |||
NDVI | 2.12 | 0.64 | 3.31 | 0.00 ** | |||
Precipitation | 0.00 | 0.00 | −1.39 | 0.17 | 4688.96 | 4789.68 | 0.59 |
Greater white-fronted goose | |||||||
(Intercept) | 91.43 | 33.97 | 2.69 | 0.01 * | |||
Year | −0.04 | 0.02 | −2.50 | 0.01 * | |||
NDVI | 1.64 | 0.76 | 2.14 | 0.03 * | 2859.72 | 2943.25 | 0.44 |
Lesser white-fronted goose | |||||||
(Intercept) | −313.56 | 113.15 | −2.77 | 0.01 * | |||
Year | 0.15 | 0.06 | 2.73 | 0.01 * | |||
NDVI CV | −0.66 | 0.32 | −2.09 | 0.04 * | |||
NDVI | 19.86 | 2.68 | 7.42 | 0.00 ** | 1271.61 | 1375.50 | 0.42 |
© 2019 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Jia, Q.; Zhang, Y.; Cao, L. Response of Anatidae Abundance to Environmental Factors in the Middle and Lower Yangtze River Floodplain, China. Sustainability 2019, 11, 6814. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11236814
Jia Q, Zhang Y, Cao L. Response of Anatidae Abundance to Environmental Factors in the Middle and Lower Yangtze River Floodplain, China. Sustainability. 2019; 11(23):6814. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11236814
Chicago/Turabian StyleJia, Qiang, Yong Zhang, and Lei Cao. 2019. "Response of Anatidae Abundance to Environmental Factors in the Middle and Lower Yangtze River Floodplain, China" Sustainability 11, no. 23: 6814. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11236814