Continuous Intention on Accommodation Apps: Integrated Value-Based Adoption and Expectation–Confirmation Model Analysis
Abstract
:1. Introduction
2. Literature and Hypotheses
2.1. Value-Based Adoption Model
2.2. Expectation-Confirmation Model
3. Methodology
3.1. Sampling and Data Collection
3.2. Research Instrument
3.3. Analytical Methods
4. Data Analysis and Results
4.1. Measurement Model
4.2. Structural Model
5. Discussion and Conclusion
5.1. Discussion
5.2. Conclusions
5.3. Limitations and Future Research
Author Contributions
Funding
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Hsieh, H.C.; Chen, Y.C.; Lin, H.C. More precise: Stores recommendation under O2O commerce. Int. J. Comput. Digit. Syst. 2014, 218, 1–9. [Google Scholar]
- Pitt, L.F.; Parent, M.; Junglas, I.; Chan, A.; Spyropoulou, S. Integrating the smartphone into a sound environmental information systems strategy: Principles, practices and a research agenda. J. Strateg. Inf. Syst. 2011, 20, 27–37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lyu, S.O.; Hwang, J. Are the days of tourist information centers gone? Effects of the ubiquitous information environment. Tour. Manag. 2015, 48, 54–63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chen, Y.C.; Hsieh, H.C.; Lin, H.C. Improved precision recommendation scheme by BPNN algorithm in O2O commerce. In Proceedings of the 2013 IEEE 10th International Conference on e-Business Engineering, Coventry, UK, 11–13 September 2013; pp. 324–328. [Google Scholar]
- Ji, S.W.; Sun, X.Y.; Liu, D. Research on core competitiveness of Chinese retail industry based on O2O. Adv. Mater. Res. 2014, 834, 2017–2020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Korea Institute of Science and Technology Information Market Report. O2O Service: A New Paradigm of Lifestyle Service. 31 August 2016. Available online: http://www.ndsl.kr/ndsl/search/detail/report/ reportSearchResultDetail.do?cn=KMR2016000336 (accessed on 11 September 2018).
- Du, Y.; Tang, Y. Study on the development of O2O e-commerce platform of China from the perspective of offline service quality. Int. J. Bus. Soc. Sci. 2014, 5, 308–312. [Google Scholar]
- Popescu, A.; Popescu, D. Hashtag progress: The digital fingerprint of Web 2.0 on tourism and hospitality industry management—A case study for Romania. Entrep. Bus. Econ. 2016, 1, 555–564. [Google Scholar]
- Okumus, B.; Bilgihan, A. Proposing a model to test smartphone users’ intention to use smart applications when ordering food in restaurants. J. Hosp. Tour. Technol. 2014, 5, 31–49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chen, M.M.; Murphy, H.C.; Knecht, S. An importance performance analysis of smartphone applications for hotel chains. J. Hosp. Tour. Manag. 2016, 29, 69–79. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gibbs, C.; Gretzel, U.; Saltzman, J. An experience-based taxonomy of branded hotel mobile application features. Inf. Technol. Tour. 2016, 16, 175–199. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Korea Tourism Organization. 2017 Overseas Travel Situation and 2018 Overseas Travel Trend Forecast. 6 November 2017. Available online: http://kto.visitkorea.or.kr/kor/notice/news/press/board/view. kto?id =428900&instanceId=42 (accessed on 11 September 2018).
- Werthner, H.; Ricci, F. E-commerce and tourism. Commun. Acm. 2004, 47, 101–105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Venkatesh, V.; Morris, M.G.; Davis, G.B.; Davis, F.D. User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view. MIS Q. 2003, 27, 425–478. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- San-Martín, H.; Herrero, Á. Influence of the user’s psychological factors on the online purchase intention in rural tourism: Integrating innovativeness to the UTAUT framework. Tour. Manag. 2012, 33, 341–350. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Venkatesh, V.; Thong, J.Y.L.; Xu, X. Consumer acceptance and use of information technology: Extending the unified theory of acceptance and use of technology. MIS Q. 2012, 36, 157–178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gaitán, A.; Peral, J.P.; Jerónimo, B.R.; Ángeles, M. Elderly and internet banking: An application of UTAUT2. J. Internet. Bank. Commerc. 2015, 20, 1–23. [Google Scholar]
- Ain, N.U.; Kaur, K.; Waheed, M. The influence of learning value on learning management system use: An extension of UTAUT2. Info. Dev. 2016, 32, 1306–1321. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kim, H.W.; Chan, H.C.; Gupta, S. Value based adoption of mobile internet: An empirical investigation. Decis. Support Syst. 2007, 43, 111–126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kwon, H.K.; Seo, K.K. Application of value-based adoption model to analyze SaaS adoption behavior in Korean B2B cloud market. Int. J. Adv. Comput. Technol. 2013, 5, 368–373. [Google Scholar]
- Chunxiang, L. Study on mobile commerce customer based on value adoption. J. Appl. Sci. 2014, 14, 901–909. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lin, T.C.; Wu, S.; Hsu, J.S.C.; Chou, Y.C. The integration of value-based adoption and expectation-confirmation models: An example of IPTV continuance intention. Decis. Support Syst. 2012, 54, 63–75. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fishbein, M.; Ajzen, I. Belief, Attitude, Intention, and Behavior: An Introduction to Theory and Research; Addison-Wesley: Reading, MA, USA, 1975. [Google Scholar]
- Festinger, L.A. A Theory of Cognitive Dissonance; Row and Peterson: Evanston, IL, USA, 1957. [Google Scholar]
- Bhattacherjee, A. Understanding information system continuance: An expectation-confirmation model. MIS Q. 2001, 25, 351–370. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sahinoglu, M.; Akkaya, A.D.; Ang, D. Can we assess and monitor privacy and security risk for social networks? Procedia - Soc. Behav. Sci. 2012, 57, 163–169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zlatolas, L.N.; Welzer, T.; Heričko, M.; Hölbl, M. Privacy antecedents for SNS self-disclosure: The case of Facebook. Comput. Hum. Behav. 2015, 45, 158–167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Young, A.L.; Quan-Haase, A. Privacy protection strategies on Facebook: The Internet privacy paradox revisited. Inf. Commun. Soc. 2013, 16, 479–500. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Agaga, G.; El-Masry, A.A. Understanding the determinants of hotel booking intentions and moderating role of habit. Int. J. Hosp. Manag. 2017, 54, 52–67. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kim, S.Y.; Kim, J.U.; Park, S.C. The Effects of Perceived Value, Website Trust and Hotel Trust on Online Hotel Booking Intention. Sustainability 2017, 9, 2262. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ozturka, A.B.; Bilgihanb, A.; Nusair, K.; Okumus, F. What keeps the mobile hotel booking users loyal? Investigating the roles of self-efficacy, compatibility, perceived ease of use, and perceived convenience. Int. J. Inf. Manag. 2016, 36, 1350–1359. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zeithaml, V.A. Consumer perceptions of price, quality, and value: A means-end model and synthesis of evidence. J. Mark. 1988, 52, 2–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shin, D.H. An empirical investigation of a modified technology acceptance model of IPTV. Behav. Inf. Technol. 2009, 28, 361–372. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Davis, F.D.; Bagozzi, R.P.; Warshaw, P.R. User acceptance of computer technology: A comparison of two theoretical models. Manag. Sci. 1989, 35, 982–1003. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rogers, E.M. Diffusion of Innovations, 4th ed.; The Free Press: New York, NY, USA, 1995. [Google Scholar]
- Venkatesh, V. Creating favorable user perceptions: Exploring the role of intrinsic motivation. MIS Q. 1999, 23, 239–260. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dinev, T.; Hart, P. An extended privacy calculus model for e-commerce transactions. Inf. Syst. Res. 2006, 17, 61–80. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Brady, M.K.; Knight, G.A.; Cronin, J.J.; Hult, G.T.; Keillor, B.D. Removing the contextual lens: A multinational, multi-setting comparison of service evaluation models. J. Retail. 2005, 81, 215–230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Mathieson, K. Predicting user intentions: Comparing the technology acceptance model with the theory of planned behavior. Inf. Syst. Res. 1991, 2, 173–191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Szajna, B. Empirical evaluation of the revised technology acceptance model. Manag. Sci. 1996, 42, 85–92. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pedersen, P.E.; Methlie, L.B.; Thorbjornsen, H. Understanding mobile commerce end-user adoption: A triangulation perspective and suggestions for an exploratory service evaluation framework. In Proceedings of the 35th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, Big Island, HI, USA, 10 January 2002. [Google Scholar]
- Wang, H.Y.; Wang, S.H. Predicting mobile hotel reservation adoption: Insight from a perceived value standpoint. Int. J. Hosp. Manag 2010, 29, 598–608. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Andersson, P.; Heinonen, K. Acceptance of Mobile Services: Insights from the Swedish Market for Mobile Telephony; SSE/EFI Working Paper Series in Business Administration No.16; Stockholm School of Economics: Stockholm, Sweden, Octorber 2002. [Google Scholar]
- Vrechopoulos, A.P.; Constantiou, I.D.; Mylonopoulos, N.; Sideris, I. Critical success factors for accelerating mobile commerce diffusion in Europe. In Proceedings of the 15th Bled Electronic Commerce Conference E-Reality: Constructing the e-Economy, Bled, Slovenia, 17–19 June 2002; pp. 477–492. [Google Scholar]
- Lin, T.C.; Lee, C.K.; Lin, J.C.C. Determinants of Enterprise 2.0 adoption: A value-based adoption model approach. In Proceedings of the 2010 International Conference on Information Society, London, UK, 28–30 June 2010; pp. 12–18. [Google Scholar]
- Lee, Y.; Kwon, O. Intimacy, familiarity and continuance intention: An extended expectation–confirmation model in web-based services. Electron. Commer. Res. Appl. 2011, 10, 342–357. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Oliver, R.L.A. Cognitive model for the antecedents and consequences of satisfaction. J. Mar. Res. 1980, 17, 460–469. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Oliver, R.L.A. Conceptual model of service quality and service satisfaction: Compatible goals, different concepts. Adv. Serv. Mark. Manag. 1993, 2, 65–85. [Google Scholar]
- Hossain, M.A.; Quaddus, M. Expectation–confirmation theory in information system research: A review and analysis. Inf. Syst. Theory. 2012, 1, 441–469. [Google Scholar]
- Min, Q.; Shenghua, X. An extended expectation confirmation model for information systems continuance. In Proceedings of the 2007 International Conference on Wireless Communications, Networking and Mobile Computing, Shanghai, China, 21–25 September 2007; pp. 3879–3882. [Google Scholar]
- Lin, C.S.; Wu, S.; Tsai, R.J. Integrating perceived playfulness into expectation-confirmation model for web portal context. Inf. Manag. 2005, 42, 683–693. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Thong, J.Y.; Hong, S.J.; Tam, K.Y. The effects of post-adoption beliefs on the expectation-confirmation model for information technology continuance. Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud. 2006, 64, 799–810. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lee, M.C. Explaining and predicting users’ continuance intention toward e-learning: An extension of the expectation–confirmation model. Comput. Educ. 2010, 54, 506–516. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kim, B.S. An empirical investigation of mobile data service continuance: Incorporating the theory of planned behavior into the expectation–confirmation model. Expert. Syst. Appl. 2010, 37, 7033–7039. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Roca, J.C.; Chiub, C.M.; Martíneza, F.J. Understanding e-learning continuance intention: An extension of the technology acceptance model. Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud. 2006, 64, 683–696. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chiu, C.M.; Wang, E.T.G. Understanding web-based learning continuance intention: The role of subjective task value. Inf. Manag. 2008, 45, 194–201. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Limayem, M.; Cheung, C.M.K. Understanding information systems continuance: The case of Internet-based learning technologies. Inf. Manag. 2008, 45, 227–232. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Atchariyachanvanich, K.; Okada, H.; Sonehara, N. What keeps online customers repurchasing through the Internet? Acm Sigecom Exchang. 2006, 6, 47–57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liao, C.; Chen, J.L.; Yen, D.C. Theory of planning behavior (TPB) and customer satisfaction in the continued use of e-service: An integrated model. Comput. Hum. Behav. 2017, 23, 2804–2822. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Featherman, M.S.; Pavlou, P.A. Predicting e-services adoption: A perceived risk facets perspective. Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud. 2003, 59, 451–474. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lee, M.C. Factors influencing the adoption of internet banking: An integration of TAM and TPB with perceived risk and perceived benefit. Electron. Commer. Res. Appl. 2009, 8, 130–141. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hair, J.F.; Hult, G.T.M.; Ringle, C.; Sarstedt, M. A Primer on Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modelling (PLS-SEM); Sage: Los Angeles, CA, USA, 2013. [Google Scholar]
- Fornell, C.R.; Larcker, D.F. Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. J. Mark. Res. 1981, 18, 39–50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Greenberg, J.A.; Axen, K.V.; Schnoll, R.; Boozer, C.N. Coffee, tea and diabetes: The role of weight loss and caffeine. Int. J. Obes. 2005, 29, 1121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Liu, F.; Zhao, X.; Chau, P.Y.; Tang, Q. Roles of perceived value and individual differences in the acceptance of mobile coupon applications. Internet Res. 2015, 25, 471–495. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ashraft, A.; Jaafar, N.I.; Sulaiman, A. The mediation effect of trusting beliefs on the relationship between expectation-confirmation and satisfaction with the usage of online product recommendation. South East Asian J. Manag. 2016, 10, 75–94. [Google Scholar]
Demographic Characteristics | Frequency | Percentage | |
---|---|---|---|
Gender | Male | 188 | 45.9 |
Female | 222 | 54.1 | |
Age | 20–29 years | 242 | 59.0 |
30–39 years | 46 | 11.2 | |
40–49 years | 64 | 15.6 | |
50–59 years | 48 | 11.7 | |
Above 60 years | 10 | 2.4 | |
Marital status | Single | 276 | 67.3 |
Married | 134 | 32.7 | |
Educational level | High school | 16 | 3.9 |
College degree | 18 | 4.4 | |
University degree | 258 | 62.9 | |
Graduate school | 118 | 28.8 | |
Annual income | Below USD 20,000 | 184 | 44.9 |
USD 20,000–29,000 | 64 | 15.6 | |
USD 30,000–39,000 | 30 | 7.3 | |
USD 40,000–49,000 | 42 | 10.2 | |
USD 50,000–59,000 | 26 | 6.3 | |
Above USD 60,000 | 64 | 15.6 | |
Occupation | Student | 164 | 40.0 |
Office workers | 72 | 17.6 | |
Sales & Service | 52 | 12.7 | |
Government employee | 4 | 1.0 | |
Professional job | 74 | 18.0 | |
Self-employed | 24 | 5.9 | |
Housewife | 8 | 2.0 | |
Others | 12 | 3.0 | |
Frequency of use for 1 year | 1–2 times | 132 | 1.4 |
3–4 times | 114 | 20.9 | |
5–6 times | 64 | 25.7 | |
7–8 times | 20 | 22.2 | |
9–10 times | 54 | 29.8 | |
Above 11 times | 26 | 6.3 | |
Used booking app | Hotels.com | 168 | 20.8 |
(multiple responses) | Yanolja | 102 | 12.6 |
Hotelscombine | 94 | 11.7 | |
Agoda | 86 | 10.7 | |
Expedia | 74 | 9.2 | |
Airbnb | 74 | 9.2 | |
Booking.com | 54 | 6.7 | |
Hotelnjoy | 38 | 4.7 | |
Trivago | 36 | 4.5 | |
Goodchoice | 22 | 2.7 | |
Hoteljoin | 14 | 1.7 | |
Tripadvisor | 12 | 1.5 | |
Others | 32 | 4.0 |
Variables & Item | Standardized Loading | CR (Composite Reliability) | AVE (Average Variance Extracted) |
---|---|---|---|
Usefulness (α = 0.888) | |||
Using an accommodation app enables me to accomplish a hotel reservation more quickly | 0.720 | 0.935 | 0.647 |
Using an accommodation app makes it easier to accomplish a hotel reservation | 0.789 | ||
Using an accommodation app saves me time and effort in making a hotel reservation | 0.824 | ||
An accommodation app is useful in hotel reservation | 0.878 | ||
Enjoyment (α = 0.846) | |||
I have fun interacting with the accommodation app | 0.835 | 0.869 | 0.650 |
Using accommodation app provides me with a lot of enjoyment | 0.844 | ||
I enjoy using the accommodation app | 0.737 | ||
Technicality (α = 0.915) | |||
I think the accommodation app is difficult to use | 0.893 | 0.930 | 0.718 |
Learning to operate the accommodation app is difficult for me | 0.938 | ||
My interaction with the accommodation app does require a lot of mental effort | 0.758 | ||
It is difficult for me to become skilled at using the accommodation app | 0.788 | ||
Perceived fee (α = 0.813) | |||
The room rate offered by the accommodation app is not cheap | 0.799 | 0.890 | 0.612 |
The room rate offered by the accommodation app is not reasonable | 0.842 | ||
I’m not happy when I make purchases or make a payment with an accommodation app | 0.700 | ||
Privacy risk (α = 0.692) | |||
I would not feel totally safe providing personal privacy information over the accommodation app | 0.906 | 0.878 | 0.579 |
Signing up for and using an accommodation app would lead to a loss of privacy for me | 0.585 | ||
Internet criminals might take control of my credit card if I used an accommodation app | 0.759 | ||
Perceived value (α = 0.876) | |||
Compared to the fee I need to pay, the use of the accommodation app offers value for money | 0.773 | 0.917 | 0.607 |
Compared to the effort I need to put in, the use of the accommodation app is beneficial to me | 0.778 | ||
Compared to the time I need to spend, the use of the accommodation app is worthwhile to me | 0.767 | ||
Overall, the use of the accommodation app delivers good value to me | 0.799 | ||
Confirmation (α = 0.839) | |||
My experience with using the accommodation app was better than what I expected | 0.830 | 0.909 | 0.635 |
The service level provided by the accommodation app was better than what I expected | 0.801 | ||
Overall, most of my expectations from using an accommodation app were confirmed | 0.759 | ||
Satisfaction (α = 0.863) | |||
I am very satisfied with the accommodation app | 0.828 | 0.930 | 0.682 |
I am very pleased with the accommodation app | 0.765 | ||
I am very content with the accommodation app | 0.880 | ||
Continuous intention (α = 0.915) | |||
I plan to use the accommodation app in the future | 0.913 | 0.957 | 0.782 |
I intend to use the accommodation app in the future | 0.867 | ||
I predict I would use the accommodation app in the future | 0.875 |
Variable | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1. Usefulness | 0.647 | 0.074 | 0.339 | 0.188 | 0.193 | 0.193 | 0.088 | 0.301 | 0.290 |
2. Enjoyment | 0.272 | 0.650 | 0.015 | 0.022 | 0.163 | 0.105 | 0.150 | 0.087 | 0.050 |
3. Technicality | −0.583 | 0.039 | 0.718 | 0.270 | 0.058 | 0.065 | 0.014 | 0.111 | 0.111 |
4. Perceived fee | −0.438 | −0.149 | 0.520 | 0.612 | 0.088 | 0.114 | 0.037 | 0.085 | 0.116 |
5. Privacy risk | 0.440 | 0.404 | −0.242 | −0.298 | 0.579 | 0.172 | 0.184 | 0.249 | 0.139 |
6. Perceived value | 0.440 | 0.325 | −0.256 | −0.338 | 0.430 | 0.607 | 0.444 | 0.427 | 0.254 |
7. Confirmation | 0.297 | 0.388 | −0.122 | −0.197 | 0.429 | 0.667 | 0.635 | 0.443 | 0.123 |
8. Satisfaction | 0.549 | 0.295 | −0.344 | −0.293 | 0.499 | 0.654 | 0.666 | 0.682 | 0.295 |
9. Continuous intention | 0.539 | 0.225 | −0.334 | −0.342 | 0.341 | 0.504 | 0.351 | 0.544 | 0.782 |
Mean | 4.052 | 3.056 | 2.202 | 2.803 | 3.344 | 3.590 | 3.414 | 3.622 | 3.902 |
S.D. | 0.612 | 0.797 | 0.760 | 0.645 | 0.594 | 0.639 | 0.630 | 0.611 | 0.640 |
Hypotheses | Beta | t-Value | p-Value | Decision | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
H1-1 | Usefulness -> Perceived value | 0.185 | 3.929 ** | 0.000 | supported |
H1-2 | Enjoyment -> Perceived value | −0.323 | −2.406 * | 0.016 | supported |
H2-1 | Technicality -> Perceived value | 0.255 | 2.170 * | 0.030 | supported |
H2-2 | Perceived fee -> Perceived value | 0.058 | 0.482 | 0.630 | rejected |
H2-3 | Privacy risk -> Perceived value | −1.057 | −6.398 ** | 0.000 | supported |
H3 | Perceived value -> Continuous intention | 0.274 | 3.213 ** | 0.001 | supported |
H4 | Perceived value -> Satisfaction | 0.102 | 0.949 | 0.343 | rejected |
H5 | Confirmation -> Satisfaction | 0.611 | 5.548 ** | 0.000 | supported |
H6 | Confirmation -> Usefulness | 0.453 | 7.635 ** | 0.000 | supported |
H7 | Usefulness -> Satisfaction | 0.353 | 7.357 ** | 0.000 | supported |
H8 | Enjoyment -> Satisfaction | −0.108 | −2.257 * | 0.010 | supported |
H9 | Satisfaction -> Continuous intention | 0.310 | 3.500 ** | 0.000 | supported |
© 2019 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Kim, S.H.; Bae, J.H.; Jeon, H.M. Continuous Intention on Accommodation Apps: Integrated Value-Based Adoption and Expectation–Confirmation Model Analysis. Sustainability 2019, 11, 1578. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11061578
Kim SH, Bae JH, Jeon HM. Continuous Intention on Accommodation Apps: Integrated Value-Based Adoption and Expectation–Confirmation Model Analysis. Sustainability. 2019; 11(6):1578. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11061578
Chicago/Turabian StyleKim, Seon Hee, Joon Ho Bae, and Hyeon Mo Jeon. 2019. "Continuous Intention on Accommodation Apps: Integrated Value-Based Adoption and Expectation–Confirmation Model Analysis" Sustainability 11, no. 6: 1578. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11061578
APA StyleKim, S. H., Bae, J. H., & Jeon, H. M. (2019). Continuous Intention on Accommodation Apps: Integrated Value-Based Adoption and Expectation–Confirmation Model Analysis. Sustainability, 11(6), 1578. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11061578