Research on Role Cognition and Employment Strategy of Rural Female Laborers in Sichuan, China
Abstract
:1. Introduction
2. Data and Methods
2.1. Research Area and Data Sources
2.2. Variables
2.2.1. Dependent Variables
2.2.2. Independent Variables
2.3. Model Methods
3. Econometric Results
3.1. Descriptive Statistical Analysis
3.2. Analysis of the Differences Between Employment Expectations and Actual Employment Strategy Selections of Rural Females
3.3. Econometric Model Results
4. Discussion
5. Conclusions and Implications
Author Contributions
Funding
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Xu, D.D.; Zhang, J.F.; Xie, F.T.; Liu, S.Q.; Cao, M.T.; Liu, E.L. Influential Factors in Employment Location Selection Based on “Push-Pull” Migration Theory—A Case Study in Three Gorges Reservoir Area in China. J. Mt. Sci. 2015, 12, 1562–1581. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Knight, J.; Deng, Q.; Li, S. The puzzle of migrant labour shortage and rural labour surplus in China. China Econ. Rev. 2011, 22, 585–600. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liu, S.Q.; Zhang, H.Q.; Xie, F.T.; Guo, S.L. Current Situation and Influencing Factors of Pluriactivity in Mountainous and Hilly Rural Areas of Sichuan Province, China. J. Mt. Sci. 2013, 10, 445–454. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Xie, F.T.; Xu, D.D.; Liu, S.Q.; Cao, M.T. The influence of gender and other characteristics on rural laborers’ employment patterns in the mountainous and upland areas of Sichuan, China. J. Mt. Sci. 2015, 12, 769–782. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, M. The impact of rural-urban migration: Case study on the Loess Plateau of Central China. China Inf. A J. Contemp. China Stud. 2010, 24, 169–189. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- National Bureau of Statistics of China. Migrant Workers Monitoring Report in 2016; China Statistical Press: Beijing, China, 2017.
- Xu, D.; Guo, S.; Xie, F.; Liu, S.; Cao, S. The impact of rural laborer migration and household structure on household land use arrangements in mountainous areas of Sichuan Province, China. Habitat Int. 2017, 70, 72–80. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Xu, D.; Peng, L.; Liu, S.; Su, C.; Wang, X.; Chen, T. Influences of migrant work income on the poverty vulnerability disaster threatened area: A case study of the Three Gorges Reservoir area, China. Int. J. Disaster Risk Reduct. 2017, 22, 62–70. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Xie, F.T. The Employment Transfer of Rural Female Laborers in the Mountainous and Upland Areas of Sichuan in the Urbanization Process; University of Chinese Academy of Sciences: Beijing, China, 2015. [Google Scholar]
- Antman, F.M. Adult Child Migration and the Health of Elderly Parents Left Behind in Mexico. Soc. Sci. Electron. Publ. 2010, 100, 205–208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Zheng, L.; Wu, Y.X. Impact of parental migration on educational development of left-behind children: Evidence from western rural area of China. J. Beijing Norm. Univ. 2014, 242, 139–146. [Google Scholar]
- National Women’s Federation Task Force. Research Report on the Situation of Floating Children in Rural and Urban Areas Left Behind in Rural Areas in China. Chin. Women’s Mov. 2013, 6, 30–34. [Google Scholar]
- Han, W.L. The Structure of Migrant Rural Workers, the Motive of Backward Mobility and Its Policy Implications: An Analysis Based on the Survey Data of Mianyang, Nanchong and Suining. Southwest Financ. 2016, 1, 61–63. [Google Scholar]
- Camlin, C.S.; Snow, R.C.; Hosegood, V. Gendered Patterns of Migration in Rural South Africa. Popul. Space Place 2014, 20, 528. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Xu, L.F. A Study on the Problems of Aging, Labor Migration and Rural Family Support—A Case Study of a Rural Multiple-child Family in Village B. North Jiangsu. J. Shandong Agric. Eng. Coll. 2015, 1, 1–3. [Google Scholar]
- Bolzendahl, C.I.; Myers, D.J. Feminist Attitudes and Support for Gender Equality: Opinion Change in Women and Men, 1974–1998. Soc. Forces 2004, 83, 759–789. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Harris, R.J.; Firestone, J.M. Changes in Predictors of Gender Role Ideologies Among Women: A Multivariate Analysis. Sex Roles 1998, 38, 239–252. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Twenge, J.M. Changes in masculine and feminine traits over time: A meta-analysis. Sex Roles 1997, 36, 305–325. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Farré, L.; Vella, F. The Intergenerational Transmission of Gender Role Attitudes and its Implications for Female Labour Force Participation. Economica 2013, 80, 219–247. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mclanahan, S.S.; Kelly, E.L. The Feminization of Poverty. J. Econ. Issues 1997, 9, 21–40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Judge, T.A.; Livingston, B.A. Is the gap more than gender? A longitudinal analysis of gender, gender role orientation, and earnings. J. Appl. Psychol. 2008, 93, 994–1012. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Eccles; Adler, T.F.; Futterman, R.; Goff, S.B.; Kaczala, C.M.; Meece, J.; Midgley, C. Achievement and achievement motives: Psychological and sociological approaches. Psychol. Sch. 1983, 1, 173–178. [Google Scholar]
- Mcbroom, W.H. Longitudinal change in sex role orientations: Differences between men and women. Sex Roles 1987, 16, 439–452. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Houser, B.B.; Beckman, L.J. Background characteristics and women’s dual-role attitudes. Sex Roles 1980, 6, 355–366. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Corrigall, E.A.; Konrad, A.M. Gender Role Attitudes and Careers: A Longitudinal Study. Sex Roles 2007, 56, 847–855. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wu, H.M. Self-Efficacy, Work-Family Conflict, Social Support, Gender Role Attitude and Role Model as Antecedents of Career Aspiration among Women in Middle Management; Universiti Putra Malaysia: Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia, 2007. [Google Scholar]
- Press Office of China. Human Resources in China; Sichuan Labor Security: Sichuan, China, 2010; pp. 13–24.
- Cao, M.; Xu, D.; Xie, F.; Liu, E.; Liu, S. The influence factors analysis of households’ poverty vulnerability in southwest ethnic areas of China based on the hierarchical linear model: A case study of Liangshan Yi autonomous prefecture. Appl. Geogr. 2016, 66, 144–152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Adachi, T. Work–family planning and gender role attitudes among youth. Int. J. Adolesc. Youth 2017. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Thornton, A.; Alwin, D.F.; Camburn, D. Cause and Consequences of Sex Role Attitudes and Attitude Change. Am. Sociol. Rev. 1983, 48, 211–227. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Rozelle, S. Stagnation Without Equity: Patterns of Growth and Inequality in China’s Rural Economy. China J. 1996, 35, 63–92. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Xu, X.Y.; Li, Z.Z.; Chen, L. An Factor Analysis of Gender Equality Cognition in the Field of Employment —A Research Based on the Survey Data in Shanghai. Fudan J. (Soc. Sci.) 2010, 4, 16–25. [Google Scholar]
- Yang, T.; Jin, X.Y. The Impact of Resource Endowment and the Social—Security System on Migrant Workers, Willingness of Land Disposal From the perspective rational choice theory. China Rural Surv. 2015, 4, 16–25. [Google Scholar]
- Ma, D.S.; Wang, L.Q. On the Relations between Rural Labor Transfer and Farmers’ Income Increase. Commer. Res. 2008, 11, 151–154. [Google Scholar]
- Wang, D.P.; Peng, J.Q.; Yan, Z. Employment and transfer status of female labor force in rural China. Asian Agric. Res. 2009, 37, 4–9. [Google Scholar]
- Fernandez, D.R.; Carlson, D.S.; Stepina, L.P.; Nicholson, J.D. Hofstede’s Country Classification 25 Years Later. J. Soc. Psychol. 1997, 137, 43–54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chang, L. Gender Role Egalitarian Attitudes in Beijing, Hong Kong, Florida, and Michigan. J. Cross-Cult. Psychol. 2016, 30, 722–741. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jin, C.A. Research on the Issues of Contemporary Chinese Women’s Employment; Northeast Normal University: Changchun, China, 2012. [Google Scholar]
- Li, J.F. Reasons for Female Employment and Development Dilemma. Popul. J. 2002, 5, 56–59. [Google Scholar]
- Silbermann, R. Gender Roles, Work-Life Balance, and Running for Office. Q. J. Polit. Sci. 2015, 10, 123–153. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bertrand, M.; Goldin, C.; Katz, L.F. Dynamics of the Gender Gap for Young Professionals in the Financial and Corporate Sectors. Am. Econ. J. Appl. Econ. 2010, 2, 228–255. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Compositional Dimensions | Measurement Indicators | Statements to Be Judged |
---|---|---|
Subjective ability cognition | Cognition of his or her own employment ability, including skill diversity, skill level, psychological adaptation, pressure resistance capability, etc. | (1) Since ancient times, males have been the breadwinners (2) Compared with males, female migrant workers suffer greater stress and psychological burdens (3) If you go out to work, you can well coordinate the conflicts between the family and the work. (The scores of the above three sentences are added up, and the resultant score ranges between 3–15 points) |
Self-role expectations | Expectations for social roles, family roles and professional roles | (1) Females should focus on taking care of the family (2) For household income/livelihoods, females should also go out to work (3) When there are certain conflicts between taking care of the family and going out to work, females should make certain sacrifices and take care of their families at home (The scores of the above three sentences are added up, and the resultant score ranges between 3–15 points.) |
Role conflicts | Cognition of the conflicts between family roles and professional roles, cognition of the conflicts between practical roles and expected roles, cognition of the conflicts between role expectations and subjective abilities | (1) You often dispute with your spouse/families over money (2) You often dispute with your spouse/families over work (3) You often dispute with your spouse/families over taking care of the family (The scores of the above three sentences are added up, and the resultant score ranges between 3–15 points.) |
Variable | Definition and Assignment | Min | Max | Mean | SD |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Explanatory variables | |||||
Role cognition variables | |||||
SAC | Subjective ability cognition | 3 | 14 | 8.03 | 1.9 |
SRE | Self-role expectations | 3 | 15 | 8.43 | 1.91 |
RCC | Role conflict cognition | 3 | 15 | 7.59 | 2.68 |
Control variables | |||||
Individual characteristics | |||||
EDU | Years of education | 0 | 15 | 6.21 | 4.27 |
MAR | MAR = 1 for married, MAR = 2 for unmarried | 1 | 2 | 1.90 | 0.31 |
AGE | Age of rural women migrant laborers | 18 | 64 | 44.83 | 12.93 |
Household characteristics | |||||
OAC | OAC = 0 for none, OAC = 1 for only children in the household, OAC = 2 for only elderly in the household, OAC = 3 for both children and elderly in the household | 0 | 3 | 1.45 | 1.02 |
Community characteristics | |||||
DISC | Distance to the nearest county (Km) | 0.10 | 40.80 | 5.19 | 4.92 |
FC | FC1 = from county1, FC2 = from county2, FC3 = from county3, FC4 = from county4, FC5 = from county5 | 1 | 5 | 3.04 | 1.47 |
Variables | Definitions | Average Value | SD | t-Value |
---|---|---|---|---|
Employment industry | 0 = unemployment/staying at home, 1 = farming, 2 = secondary industry, 3 = tertiary industry I, 4 = tertiary industry II | 1.83 | 1.44 | 12.54 *** |
Industry selection tendency | 2.78 | 0.84 | ||
Employment location | 1 = in the county, 2 = in other counties of the province, 3 = in other provinces | 1.35 | 0.72 | −2.12 * |
Employment location selection tendency | 1.44 | 0.75 |
Variable | Employment Location (OR) | Employment Location Selection Tendency (OR) | Employment Industry (OR) | Industry Selection Tendency (OR) | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RC | HP | OHP | HP | OHP | PI | SI | TI1 | TI2 | PI | SI | TI1 | TI2 |
SAC | 0.170 | 0.069 | 0.254 *** | −0.028 | 0.208 ** | 0.144 | 0.280 ** | 0.226 *** | −0.246 | 0.011 | 0.104 | 0.246 |
(1.290) | (1.231) | (1.323) | (1.254) | |||||||||
SRE | 0.168 | 0.222 ** | 0.135 * | 0.200 ** | 0.164 * | 0.369 *** | 0.322 *** | 0.224 *** | −0.172 | 0.391 *** | 0.363 *** | 0.415 *** |
(1.249) | (1.145) | (1.220) | (1.178) | (1.446) | (1.380) | (1.251) | (1.479) | (1.438) | (1.515) | |||
RCC | 0.046 | 0.023 | 0.118 ** | 0.094 ** | 0.097 * | 0.189 | 0.018 | 0.000 | −0.303 *** | −0.105 | −0.065 | −0.094 |
(1.125) | (1.010) | (1.102) | (0.739) |
Variable | Employment Location (OR) | Employment Location Selection Tendency (OR) | Employment Industry (OR) | Industry Selection Tendency (OR) | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HP | OHP | HP | OHP | HOM | SI | TI1 | TI2 | HOM | SI | TI1 | TI2 | |
Role Cognition | ||||||||||||
SAC | 0.085 | 0.036 | 0.177 ** (1.194) | −0.111 | 0.132 | 0.068 | 0.209 * (1.233) | 0.099 | −0.314 | −0.131 | 0.020 | 0.068 |
SRE | 0.086 | 0.11 | 0.019 | 0.051 | 0.025 | 0.256 ** (1.292) | 0.228 ** (1.256) | 0.069 | −0.520 | 0.344 ** (1.410) | 0.390 *** (1.477) | 0.296 * (1.345) |
RCC | 0.073 | 0.031 | 0.153 *** (1.165) | 0.120 ** (1.127) | 0.130 ** (1.139) | 0.046 | 0.042 | 0.047 | −0.432 *** (0.649) | −0.122 | −0.083 | −0.104 |
Control variable | ||||||||||||
Individual characteristics | ||||||||||||
EDU | 0.070 | −0.010 | 0.028 | −0.004 | 0.012 | 0.055 | 0.033 | 0.161 *** (1.174) | 0.003 | 0.183 ** (1.200) | 0.178 ** (1.195) | 0.231 *** (1.260) |
MAR | −0.544 | 0.543 | −0.515 | −0.572 | −0.266 | −0.118 | −0.553 | −0.272 | −1.124 | 1.168 | 1.431 * (4.181) | 0.457 |
AGE | −0.047 *** (0.954) | −0.077 *** (0.926) | −0.057 *** (0.944) | −0.070 *** (0.932) | −0.114 *** (0.893) | −0.094 *** (0.910) | −0.075 *** (0.928) | −0.106 *** (0.900) | −0.097 * (0.907) | −0.061 *** (0.940) | −0.019 | −0.092 *** (0.913) |
Household characteristics | ||||||||||||
CWO | 1.378 | −0.393 | −0.345 | −0.373 | 0.433 | −0.025 | −0.206 | −0.025 | −13.653 *** (0.00) | 0.473 | 0.608 | 0.809 |
OWC | 0.563 | 0.882 ** (2.417) | 0.596 | 0.051 | 0.437 | 0.887 * (2.427) | 0.596 | 0.887 | 0.368 | 0.962 | 0.490 | 0.832 |
CAO | 1.073 | −0.014 | 0.082 | 0.554 | 0.181 | 0.012 | 0.393 | 0.012 *** (0.205) | 2.080 | 1.487 | 0.959 | 1.151 |
Community characteristics | ||||||||||||
DISC | −0.007 | 0.054 ** (1.056) | 0.033 | 0.063 ** (1.065) | −0.029 | 0.021 | 0.016 | 0.021 | −0.135 | −0.017 | −0.005 | −0.052 |
FC2 | 0.307 | 1.427 ** (4.166) | −0.310 | 0.825 | −0.219 | 1.265 * (3.544) | 0.093 | 1.265 | −1.451 | −1.245 | −1.753 ** (0.173) | −0.761 |
FC3 | −0.069 | 0.420 | 0.181 | 0.561 | 0.223 | 1.137 | 0.111 | 1.137 | −1.007 | −2.012 ** (0.134) | −2.512 *** (0.081) | −1.963 ** (0.140) |
FC4 | −1.071 | 1.489 *** (4.434) | 0.255 | 1.401 *** (4.058) | 0.634 | 1.515 ** (4.548) | 0.608 | 1.515 | −15.903 *** (0.00) | −0.322 | −0.755 | −0.855 |
FC5 | 0.050 * (1.051) | 0.670 | 0.313 | 1.374 *** (3.953) | 0.367 | 1.353 ** (3.870) | 0.410 | 1.353 | −13.888 *** (0.00) | 0.296 | −0.390 | −0.460 |
© 2019 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Shui, Y.; Xu, D.; Liu, S. Research on Role Cognition and Employment Strategy of Rural Female Laborers in Sichuan, China. Sustainability 2019, 11, 1708. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11061708
Shui Y, Xu D, Liu S. Research on Role Cognition and Employment Strategy of Rural Female Laborers in Sichuan, China. Sustainability. 2019; 11(6):1708. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11061708
Chicago/Turabian StyleShui, Yue, Dingde Xu, and Shaoquan Liu. 2019. "Research on Role Cognition and Employment Strategy of Rural Female Laborers in Sichuan, China" Sustainability 11, no. 6: 1708. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11061708
APA StyleShui, Y., Xu, D., & Liu, S. (2019). Research on Role Cognition and Employment Strategy of Rural Female Laborers in Sichuan, China. Sustainability, 11(6), 1708. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11061708