Next Article in Journal
Content Analysis of Talent Policy on Promoting Sustainable Development of Talent: Taking Sichuan Province as an Example
Next Article in Special Issue
Revealing Urban Morphology and Outdoor Comfort through Genetic Algorithm-Driven Urban Block Design in Dry and Hot Regions of China
Previous Article in Journal
Community-Based Tourism in Developing Countries: A Framework for Policy Evaluation
Previous Article in Special Issue
The Benefits and Barriers for Promoting Bamboo as a Green Building Material in China—An Integrative Analysis
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Evaluating Social Housing Retrofit Options to Support Clients’ Decision Making—SIMPLER BIM Protocol

1
School of Art, Design and Architecture, University of Huddersfield, Huddersfield HD1 3DH, UK
2
The Bartlett School of Construction and Project Management, Faculty of the Built Environment; London’s Global University, London WC1H 0QB, UK
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Sustainability 2019, 11(9), 2507; https://doi.org/10.3390/su11092507
Submission received: 22 March 2019 / Revised: 22 April 2019 / Accepted: 24 April 2019 / Published: 30 April 2019
(This article belongs to the Collection Sustainable Built Environment)

Abstract

The UK government made significant commitments to upgrading the energy efficiency of seven million British homes by 2020, aiming at reducing carbon emissions and addressing fuel poverty. One alternative to achieve better energy performance in existing houses is retrofit. However, there are difficulties associated with retrofitting social housing. It is currently challenging to compare scenarios (retrofit options) considering costs, potential energy efficiency gains, and at the same time minimising disruption to users. This paper presents a Building Information Modelling (BIM) protocol aimed to support decision making by social housing owners. It adopts BIM to simulate alternative retrofit options, considering: (a) potential reductions in energy consumption, (b) 4D BIM for retrofit planning and reduction of users’ disruption and (c) simulation of costs. A what-if scenario matrix is proposed to support decision making in the selection of social housing retrofit solutions, according to client and users’ needs. A case study of the retrofit of a mid-terrace house is presented to demonstrate the workflow. The main output of the work is the BIM protocol, which can support client decision making in diverse social housing retrofit projects, considering all three elements (energy simulation, planning for reduced disruption and cost estimation) in an integrated fashion. Such an integrated approach enables clients to make better informed decisions considering diverse social housing retrofit options through a simple process using readily available BIM technology.
Keywords: retrofit; building information modelling; social housing; energy simulation; cost estimate; 4D simulation; construction disruption retrofit; building information modelling; social housing; energy simulation; cost estimate; 4D simulation; construction disruption

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Tzortzopoulos, P.; Ma, L.; Soliman Junior, J.; Koskela, L. Evaluating Social Housing Retrofit Options to Support Clients’ Decision Making—SIMPLER BIM Protocol. Sustainability 2019, 11, 2507. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11092507

AMA Style

Tzortzopoulos P, Ma L, Soliman Junior J, Koskela L. Evaluating Social Housing Retrofit Options to Support Clients’ Decision Making—SIMPLER BIM Protocol. Sustainability. 2019; 11(9):2507. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11092507

Chicago/Turabian Style

Tzortzopoulos, Patricia, Ling Ma, João Soliman Junior, and Lauri Koskela. 2019. "Evaluating Social Housing Retrofit Options to Support Clients’ Decision Making—SIMPLER BIM Protocol" Sustainability 11, no. 9: 2507. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11092507

APA Style

Tzortzopoulos, P., Ma, L., Soliman Junior, J., & Koskela, L. (2019). Evaluating Social Housing Retrofit Options to Support Clients’ Decision Making—SIMPLER BIM Protocol. Sustainability, 11(9), 2507. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11092507

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop