Next Article in Journal
Forest Certification: More Than a Market-Based Tool, Experiences from the Asia Pacific Region
Next Article in Special Issue
An Integrated Approach for Modeling Ontology-Based Task Knowledge on an Incident Command System
Previous Article in Journal
Integrating Biophysical and Sociocultural Methods for Identifying the Relationships between Ecosystem Services and Land Use Change: Insights from an Oasis Area
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Inter-University Sustainability Benchmarking for Canadian Higher Education Institutions: Water, Energy, and Carbon Flows for Technical-Level Decision-Making

1
School of Engineering, University of British Columbia (Okanagan), 3333 University Way, Kelowna, BC V1V 1V7, Canada
2
Civil Engineering Department, College of Engineering, Qassim University, Buraydah, Qassim 52571, Saudi Arabia
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Sustainability 2019, 11(9), 2599; https://doi.org/10.3390/su11092599
Submission received: 16 April 2019 / Revised: 1 May 2019 / Accepted: 2 May 2019 / Published: 6 May 2019

Abstract

The education sector is one of the major contributors to the total greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions in Canada, i.e., 16% of total emissions among 11 sectors. Canadian higher education institutions (HEIs) consume around 60% of the total energy fed to the educational sector. Existing tools holistically cover a wide array of functions to assess the sustainability of HEIs. The infrastructure (engineered) systems are the pivotal units responsible for the majority of energy and water consumption and may have been built, retrofitted, or replaced at different times using different materials and technologies. Consequently, infrastructures have varying efficiency, designs, building envelopes, and environmental impacts. For technical-level decision making for improving the engineered systems, HEIs need to be benchmarked on the basis of their water, energy, and carbon flows. A methodology is developed for sustainability assessment of 34 Canadian HEIs that are classified into small, medium, and large sizes based on their number of full-time equivalent students (FTE). Energy, water consumption, number of students, and floor area is measured in different units and are, thus, normalized. The study revealed that the energy source was the primary factor affecting the sustainability performance of an institution. The analysis also revealed that small-sized institutions outperformed medium-to-large-sized institutions.
Keywords: higher education institutions; sustainability assessment; benchmarking; energy flow; carbon flow; sustainable development higher education institutions; sustainability assessment; benchmarking; energy flow; carbon flow; sustainable development

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Alghamdi, A.; Haider, H.; Hewage, K.; Sadiq, R. Inter-University Sustainability Benchmarking for Canadian Higher Education Institutions: Water, Energy, and Carbon Flows for Technical-Level Decision-Making. Sustainability 2019, 11, 2599. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11092599

AMA Style

Alghamdi A, Haider H, Hewage K, Sadiq R. Inter-University Sustainability Benchmarking for Canadian Higher Education Institutions: Water, Energy, and Carbon Flows for Technical-Level Decision-Making. Sustainability. 2019; 11(9):2599. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11092599

Chicago/Turabian Style

Alghamdi, Abdulaziz, Husnain Haider, Kasun Hewage, and Rehan Sadiq. 2019. "Inter-University Sustainability Benchmarking for Canadian Higher Education Institutions: Water, Energy, and Carbon Flows for Technical-Level Decision-Making" Sustainability 11, no. 9: 2599. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11092599

APA Style

Alghamdi, A., Haider, H., Hewage, K., & Sadiq, R. (2019). Inter-University Sustainability Benchmarking for Canadian Higher Education Institutions: Water, Energy, and Carbon Flows for Technical-Level Decision-Making. Sustainability, 11(9), 2599. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11092599

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop