Impact of Industry 4.0 on Environmental Sustainability
Abstract
:1. Introduction
2. Literature Review
2.1. Industry 4.0 and Its Technologies
2.2. Sustainable Environment and Industry 4.0
3. Materials and Methods
4. Results
4.1. Scenario Analysis
Deployment Scenario
5. Discussions
5.1. Environment Sustainability
5.2. The Long-Term Scenario
6. Conclusions
6.1. Deployment
6.2. Operation Scenario
6.3. Sustainable Development Goals
6.4. Industry 4.0 for Long-Term Sustainability
7. Limitations of the Study
Author Contributions
Funding
Conflicts of Interest
References
- McWilliams, A.; Parhankangas, A.; Coupet, J.; Welch, E.; Barnum, D.T. Strategic decision making for the triple bottom line. Bus. Strategy Environ. 2016, 25, 193–204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bonilla, S.; Silva, H.; Terra, M.; Franco, G.R.; Sacomano, J. Industry 4.0 and Sustainability Implications: A Scenario-Based Analysis of the Impacts and Challenges. Sustainability 2018, 10, 3740. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Zhu, D.; Zhang, S.; Sutton, D.B. Linking Daly’s Proposition to policymaking for sustainable development: Indicators and pathways. J. Clean. Prod. 2015, 102, 333–341. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Terlau, W.; Hirsch, D. Sustainable consumption and the attitude-behaviour-gap phenomenon-causes and measurements towards a sustainable development. Int. J. Food Syst. Dyn. 2015, 6, 159–174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Seddon, N.; Mace, G.M.; Naeem, S.; Tobias, J.A.; Pigot, A.L.; Cavanagh, R.; Mouillot, D.; Vause, J.; Walpole, M. Biodiversity in the Anthropocene: Prospects and policy. Proc. R. Soc. B Biol. Sci. 2016, 283, 2094. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Szeremlei Keszi, A.; Magda, R. Sustainable Production and Consumption. Visegr. J. Bioeconomy Sustain. Dev. 2015, 4, 57–61. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Xu, L.D.; Xu, E.L.; Li, L. Industry 4.0: State of the art and future trends. Int. J. Prod. Res. 2018, 56, 2941–2962. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Lentner, C.; Vasa, L.; Kolozsi, P.P.; Zéman, Z. New dimensions of internal controls in banking after the GFC. Econ. Ann. XXI 2019, 176, 38–48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Shpak, N.; Odrekhivskyi, M.; Doroshkevych, K.; Sroka, W. Simulation of Innovative Systems under Industry 4.0 Conditions. Soc. Sci. 2019, 8, 202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Shpak, N.; Podolchak, N.; Karkovska, V.; Sroka, W. The influence of age factors on the reform of the public service of Ukraine. Cent. Eur. J. Public Policy 2019, 13, 40–52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Smith, J.A. Evaluating the contribution of interpretative phenomenological analysis: A reply to the commentaries and further development of criteria. Health Psychol. Rev. 2011, 5, 55–61. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bertoncel, T.; Erenda, I.; Meško, M. Managerial early warning system as best practice for project selection at a smart factory. Amfiteatru Econ. 2018, 20, 805–819. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Papadimitriou, F. Conceptual modelling of landscape complexity. Landsc. Res. 2010, 35, 563–570. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, Y.; Dai, J.; Cui, L. The impact of digital technologies on economic and environmental performance in the context of industry 4.0: A moderated mediation model. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 2020, 229, 1–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ślusarczyk, B. Industry 4.0: Are we ready? Pol. J. Manag. Stud. 2018, 17, 232–248. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liao, Y.; Deschamps, F.; Loures, E.D.F.R.; Ramos, L.F.P. Past, present and future of Industry 4.0-a systematic literature review and research agenda proposal. Int. J. Prod. Res. 2017, 55, 3609–3629. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Da Silva, F.S.T.; da Costa, C.A.; Crovato, C.D.P.; da Rosa Righi, R. Looking at energy through the lens of Industry 4.0: A systematic literature review of concerns and challenges. Comput. Ind. Eng. 2020, 143, 1–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bertoldi, P.; Mosconi, R. Do energy efficiency policies save energy? A new approach based on energy policy indicators (in the EU Member States). Energy Policy 2020, 139, 1–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zawadzki, P.; Żywicki, K. Smart product design and production control for effective mass customization in the Industry 4.0 concept. Manag. Prod. Eng. Rev. 2016, 7, 102–105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fu, B.; Shu, Z.; Liu, X. Blockchain enhanced emission trading framework in fashion apparel manufacturing industry. Sustainability 2018, 10, 1105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Chan, H.C. Internet of things business models. J. Serv. Sci. Manag. 2015, 8, 552–568. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Wang, C.; Zhou, G.; Zhu, Z. Service perspective based production control system for smart job shop under industry 4.0. Robot. Comput. Integr. Manuf. 2020, 65, 101954. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mura, L.; Vlacseková, D. Motivation of public employees: Case study of Slovak teaching and professional staff. Adm. Si Manag. Public 2018, 67–80. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Haug, K.C.; Kretschmer, T.; Strobel, T. Cloud adaptiveness within industry sectors–Measurement and observations. Telecommun. Policy 2016, 40, 291–306. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Nagy, J.; Oláh, J.; Erdei, E.; Máté, D.; Popp, J. The role and impact of industry 4.0 and the internet of things on the business strategy of the value chain-The case of Hungary. Sustainability 2018, 10, 3491. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- O’Rielly, K.; Jeswiet, J. Strategies to improve industrial energy efficiency. Procedia Cirp 2014, 15, 325–330. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Lasi, H.; Fettke, P.; Kemper, H.-G.; Feld, T.; Hoffmann, M. Industrie 4.0. Wirtschaftsinformatik 2014, 56, 261–264. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kiel, D.; Müller, J.M.; Arnold, C.; Voigt, K.-I. Sustainable industrial value creation: Benefits and challenges of industry 4.0. Int. J. Innov. Manag. 2017, 21, 1–6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lingam, Y.K. The role of Artificial Intelligence (AI) in making accurate stock decisions in E-commerce industry. Int. J. Adv. Res. Ideas Innov. Technol. 2018, 4, 2281–2286. Available online: https://www.itu.int/dms_pub/itu-s/opb/gen/S-GEN-ISSUEPAPER-2018-1-PDF-E.pdf (accessed on 5 April 2020).
- Evers, G.; Chappin, M.M. Knowledge sharing in smart grid pilot projects. Energy Policy 2020, 143, 111577. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Napolitano, F.; Girolami, A.; Faraone, D.; Chaudhry, M.; Braghieri, A. Appearance, consumer liking and preferences of Lucanian ‘Soppressata’salami. Meat Sci. 2020, 167, 1–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- McGee, Z.A.; Jones, B.D. Reconceptualizing the policy subsystem: Integration with complexity theory and social network analysis. Policy Stud. J. 2019, 47, S138–S158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Gale, R.J.; Stokoe, P.K. Environmental Cost Accounting and Business Strategy. In Handbook of Environmentally Conscious Manufacturing; Springer: Boston, MA, USA, 2001; pp. 119–136. [Google Scholar]
- Mazahir, S.; Ardestani-Jaafari, A. Robust global sourcing under compliance legislation. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 2020, 284, 152–163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pajula, T.; Behm, K.; Vatanen, S.; Saarivuori, E. Managing the Life Cycle to Reduce Environmental Impacts. In Dynamics of Long-Life Assets; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2017; pp. 93–113. [Google Scholar]
- Daki, H.; El Hannani, A.; Aqqal, A.; Haidine, A.; Dahbi, A. Big Data management in smart grid: Concepts, requirements and implementation. J. Big Data 2017, 4, 1–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Oesterreich, T.D.; Teuteberg, F. Understanding the implications of digitisation and automation in the context of Industry 4.0: A triangulation approach and elements of a research agenda for the construction industry. Comput. Ind. 2016, 83, 121–139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wirtz, B.W.; Daiser, P. Business model development: A customer-oriented perspective. J. Bus. Models 2018, 6, 24–44. Available online: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/Business-Model-Development%3A-A-Customer-Oriented-Wirtz-Daiser/a2eaae231d407fad5d5f0cc396d98afd481b0379 (accessed on 5 April 2020).
- Biagi, F.; Falk, M. The impact of ICT and e-commerce on employment in Europe. J. Policy Modeling 2017, 39, 1–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wan, J.; Yan, H.; Suo, H.; Li, F. Advances in Cyber-Physical Systems Research. KSII Trans. Internet Inf. Syst. 2011, 5, 1891–1908. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gunal, M.M. Simulation for Industry 4.0: Past, Present, and Future; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2019. [Google Scholar]
- Ford, S.; Despeisse, M. Additive manufacturing and sustainability: An exploratory study of the advantages and challenges. J. Clean. Prod. 2016, 137, 1573–1587. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jelonek, M.; Urbaniec, M. Development of sustainability competencies for the labour market: An exploratory qualitative study. Sustainability 2019, 11, 5716. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Stock, T.; Seliger, G. Opportunities of Sustainable Manufacturing in Industry 4.0. Procedia CIRP 40. In Proceedings of the 13th Global Conference on Sustainable Manufacturing-Decoupling Growth from Resource Use, Berlin, Germany, 16–18 September 2011; pp. 536–541. [Google Scholar]
- Burritt, R.; Christ, K. Industry 4.0 and environmental accounting: A new revolution? Asian J. Sustain. Soc. Responsib. 2016, 1, 23–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Müller, E.; Hopf, H. Competence center for the digital transformation in small and medium-sized enterprises. Procedia Manuf. 2017, 11, 1495–1500. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tim, S.; Michael, O.; Holger, K. Industry 4.0 as Enabler for a Sustainable Development: A Qualitative Assessment of its Ecological and Social Potential. Process Saf. Environ. Prot. 2018, 118, 254–267. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Junior, J.A.G.; Busso, C.M.; Gobbo, S.C.O.; Carreão, H. Making the links among environmental protection, process safety, and industry 4.0. Process Saf. Environ. Prot. 2018, 117, 372–382. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Bressanelli, G.; Adrodegari, F.; Perona, M.; Saccani, N. Exploring how usage-focused business models enable circular economy through digital technologies. Sustainability 2018, 10, 639. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Carrillo, J.E.; Vakharia, A.J.; Wang, R. Environmental implications for online retailing. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 2014, 239, 744–755. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Beier, G.; Ullrich, A.; Niehoff, S.; Reißig, M.; Habich, M. Industry 4.0: How it is defined from a sociotechnical perspective and how much sustainability it includes–A literature review. J. Clean. Prod. 2020, 259, 1–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kumar, M.S.; Luthra, S. Evaluating challenges to Industry 4.0 initiatives for supply chain sustainability in emerging economies. Process Saf. Environ. Prot. 2018, 117, 168–179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Beier, G.; Niehoff, S.; Ziems, T.; Xue, B. Sustainability aspects of a digitalized industry–A comparative study from China and Germany. Int. J. Precis. Eng. Manuf. Green Technol. 2017, 4, 227–234. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Waas, T.; Hugé, J.; Block, T.; Wright, T.; Benitez-Capistros, F.; Verbruggen, A. Sustainability assessment and indicators: Tools in a decision-making strategy for sustainable development. Sustainability 2014, 6, 5512–5534. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Swain, M.; Blomqvist, L.; McNamara, J.; Ripple, W.J. Reducing the environmental impact of global diets. Sci. Total Environ. 2018, 610, 1207–1209. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pilloni, V. How data will transform industrial processes: Crowdsensing, crowdsourcing and big data as pillars of industry 4.0. Future Internet 2018, 10, 24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Pereira, A.; Romero, F. A review of the meanings and the implications of the Industry 4.0 concept. Procedia Manuf. 2017, 13, 1206–1214. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Van Loon, P.; Deketele, L.; Dewaele, J.; McKinnon, A.; Rutherford, C. A comparative analysis of carbon emissions from online retailing of fast moving consumer goods. J. Clean. Prod. 2015, 106, 478–486. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dang, L.M.; Piran, M.; Han, D.; Min, K.; Moon, H. A survey on internet of things and cloud computing for healthcare. Electronics 2019, 8, 768. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Memon, M.A.; Soomro, S.; Jumani, A.K.; Kartio, M.A. Big Data Analytics and Its Applications. Ann. Emergy Technol. Comput. 2017, 1, 45–54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kang, H.S.; Lee, J.Y.; Choi, S.; Kim, H.; Park, J.H.; Son, J.Y.; Kim, B.H.; Do Noh, S. Smart manufacturing: Past research, present findings, and future directions. Int. J. Precis. Eng. Manuf. Green Technol. 2016, 3, 111–128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ghani, U.; Monfared, R.; Harrison, R. Real Time Energy Consum. Anal. Manuf. Syst. Using Integr. Virtual Discret. Event Simul. 2012, 69–73. Available online: https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/7773/3ff79c15862825fdfdb6a9d424985b914b37.pdf (accessed on 6 April 2020).
- Dao, V.; Langella, I.; Carbo, J. From green to sustainability: Information Technology and an integrated sustainability framework. J. Strateg. Inf. Syst. 2011, 20, 63–79. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sarkar, M.; Sarkar, B. How does an industry reduce waste and consumed energy within a multi-stage smart sustainable biofuel production system? J. Clean. Prod. 2020, 262, 1–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhou, Y.M.; Wan, X. Product variety and vertical integration. Strateg. Manag. J. 2017, 38, 1134–1150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Topleva, S. Industry 4.0: Transforming Economy Through Value Added. Asian J. Econ. Model. 2018, 6, 37–46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Brundage, M.P.; Chang, Q.; Arinez, J.; Xiao, G. Reducing Costs in the Manufacturing Industry: An Energy Economic Perspective. In Proceedings of the ASME 2015 International Manufacturing Science and Engineering Conference, Charlotte, NC, USA, 8–12 June 2015. [Google Scholar]
- Chuang, S.; Sahoo, N.; Lin, H.W.; Chang, Y.H. Predictive Maintenance with Sensor Data Analytics on a Raspberry Pi-Based Experimental Platform. Sensors 2019, 19, 3884. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Sreenivasan, R.; Goel, A.; Bourell, D.L. Sustainability issues in laser-based additive manufacturing. Phys. Procedia 2010, 5, 81–90. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Rao, S.K.; Prasad, R. Impact of 5G technologies on industry 4.0. Wirel. Pers. Commun. 2018, 100, 145–159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shukla, S.; Mohanty, B.; Kumar, A. Strategizing sustainability in e-commerce channels for additive manufacturing using value-focused thinking and fuzzy cognitive maps. Ind. Manag. Data Syst. 2018, 118, 390–411. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fuel Energy Abstrarcts. 2007, 148, 394–448. Available online: https://www.sciencedirect.com/journal/fuel-and-energy-abstracts/vol/48/issue/6 (accessed on 5 April 2020).
- Neal, A.D.; Sharpe, R.G.; Conway, P.P.; West, A.A. smaRTI-A cyber-physical intelligent container for industry 4.0 manufacturing. J. Manuf. Syst. 2019, 52, 63–75. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sheppard, P.; Rahimifard, S. Improving energy efficiency in manufacturing using peer benchmarking to influence machine design innovation. Clean Technol. Environ. Policy 2019, 21, 1213–1235. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Shrouf, F.; Miragliotta, G. Energy management based on Internet of Things: Practices and framework for adoption in production management. J. Clean. Prod. 2015, 100, 235–246. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bhadra, A.; Kachwala, T. Impact of CSR on business. Int. J. Multidiscip. Manag. Stud. 2014, 4, 144–160. Available online: http://www.indianjournals.com/ijor.aspx?target=ijor:xijmms&volume=4&issue=3&article=015 (accessed on 5 April 2020).
- Zhang, T.C.; Jahromi, M.F.; Kizildag, M. Value co-creation in a sharing economy: The end of price wars? Int. J. Hosp. Manag. 2018, 71, 51–58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Xie, S.; Dai, H.N.; Zheng, Z.; Dai, H.; Chen, X.; Wang, H. An Overview of Blockchain Technology. Int. J. Adv. Res. Comput. Eng. Technol. 2018, 7, 789–795. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sikorski, J.J.; Haughton, J.; Kraft, M. Blockchain technology in the chemical industry: Machine-to-machine electricity market. Appl. Energy 2017, 195, 234–246. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gursel, A.P.; Masanet, E.; Horvath, A.; Stadel, A. Life-cycle inventory analysis of concrete production: A critical review. Cem. Concr. Compos. 2014, 51, 38–48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Altintas, K.; Tuğba, T.; Vayvay, Ö. Renewable energy for a sustainable future. Marmara Fen Bilimleri Derg. 2016, 28, 7–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- De La Torre, G.; Rad, P.; Choo, K.-K.R. Implementation of deep packet inspection in smart grids and industrial Internet of Things: Challenges and opportunities. J. Netw. Comput. Appl. 2019, 135, 32–46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hannouf, M.; Assefa, G.; Gates, I. From social hotspots to policies for successful implementation of environmentally better technologies? The example of social life cycle assessment of oil and gas technologies in Alberta, Canada. Environ. Sci. Policy 2020, 110, 24–33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sarkis, J.; Zhu, Q. Environmental sustainability and production: Taking the road less travelled. Int. J. Prod. Res. 2018, 56, 743–759. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Junquera, B.; Barba-Sánchez, V. Environmental proactivity and firms’ performance: Mediation effect of competitive advantages in Spanish wineries. Sustainability 2018, 10, 2155. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Johansson, N.; Roth, E.; Reim, W. Smart and Sustainable eMaintenance: Capabilities for Digitalization of Maintenance. Sustainability 2019, 11, 3553. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Khan, A.G. Electronic commerce: A study on benefits and challenges in an emerging economy. Glob. J. Manag. Bus. Res. 2016, 1–9. Available online: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/Electronic-Commerce%3AStudy-on-Benefits-and-in-an-Khan/ccfdb3fed633c338362da7e0032256ff369936bf (accessed on 6 April 2020).
- Terzi, N. The impact of e-commerce on international trade and employment. Procedia Soc. Behav. Sci. 2011, 24, 745–753. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Mohelska, H.; Sokolova, M. Management approaches for Industry 4.0–the organizational culture perspective. Technol. Econ. Dev. Econ. 2018, 24, 2225–2240. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Kulyk, V.; Škodová Parmová, D. E-business development: The comparative study of the Czech Republic and the Ukraine. Deturope 2017, 9, 80–110. Available online: http://www.deturope.eu/img/upload/content_95997736.pdf. (accessed on 6 April 2020).
- Sullivan, Y.; Kim, D. Assessing the effects of consumers’ product evaluations and trust on repurchase intention in e-commerce environments. Int. J. Inf. Manag. 2018, 39, 199–219. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Santanen, E. The value of protecting privacy. Bus. Horiz. 2019, 62, 5–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yaseen, H.; Alhusban, M.D.; Alhosban, A.; Dingley, K. Making Sense of E-Commerce Customers Awareness in a Developing Country Context: A Framework for Evaluation. Electron. J. Inf. Syst. Eval. 2017, 20, 102–115. Available online: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/319332735_Making_Sense_of_E-Commerce_Customers_Awareness_in_a_Developing_Country_Context_A_Framework_for_Evaluation (accessed on 6 April 2020).
- Stock, T.; Seliger, G. Opportunities of sustainable manufacturing in industry 4.0. Procedia Cirp 2016, 40, 536–541. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Brous, P.; Janssen, M.; Herder, P. The dual effects of the Internet of Things (IoT): A systematic review of the benefits and risks of IoT adoption by organizations. Int. J. Inf. Manag. 2020, 51, 101952. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, S.; Wan, J.; Li, D.; Zhang, C. Implementing Smart Factory of Industrie 4.0: An Outlook. Int. J. Distrib. Sens. Netw. 2016, 12, 3159805. Available online: http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1155/2016/3159805 (accessed on 5 April 2020). [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Lu, Y. Industry 4.0: A survey on technologies, applications and open research issues. J. Ind. Inf. Integr. 2017, 6, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Goni, F.A.; Shukor, S.A.; Mukhtar, M.; Sahran, S. Environmental sustainability: Research growth and trends. Adv. Sci. Lett. 2015, 21, 192–195. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gielen, D.; Boshell, F.; Saygin, D.; Bazilian, M.D.; Wagner, N.; Gorini, R. The role of renewable energy in the global energy transformation. Energy Strategy Rev. 2019, 24, 38–50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Griggs, D.; Smith, M.S.; Rockström, J.; Öhman, M.C.; Gaffney, O.; Glaser, G.; Kanie, N.; Noble, I.; Steffen, W.; Shyamsundar, P. An integrated framework for sustainable development goals. Ecol. Soc. 2014, 19. Available online: https://www.jstor.org/stable/26269703?seq=1#metadata_info_tab_contents (accessed on 5 April 2020). [CrossRef]
- Goodland, R.; Daly, H. Environmental sustainability: Universal and non-negotiable. Ecol. Appl. 1996, 6, 1002–1017. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Habbard, G. Measuring organization performance beyond the triple button line. Bus Strateg. 2009, 177–191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Qin, J.; Liu, Y.; Grosvenor, R. A categorical framework of manufacturing for industry 4.0 and beyond. Procedia Cirp 2016, 52, 173–178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Li, G.; Wang, H.; Hardjawana, W. New advancement in information technologies for industry 4.0. Enterp. Inf. Syst. 2020, 14, 402–405. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Dorofeev, K.; Cheng, C.-H.; Guedes, M.; Ferreira, P.; Profanter, S.; Zoitl, A. Device Adapter Concept Towards Enabling Plug&Produce Production Environments. In Proceedings of the 2017 22nd IEEE International Conference on Emerging Technologies and Factory Automation (ETFA), Limassol, Cyprus, 12–15 September 2017; pp. 1–8. [Google Scholar]
- Nagy, S. E-commerce in Hungary: A Market Analysis. Theory Methodol. Pract. 2016, 12, 25–32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Luchs, M.G.; Phipps, M.; Hill, T. Exploring consumer responsibility for sustainable consumption. J. Mark. Manag. 2015, 31, 1449–1471. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sima, V.; Gheorghe, I.G.; Subić, J.; Nancu, D. Influences of the Industry 4.0 Revolution on the Human Capital Development and Consumer Behavior: A Systematic Review. Sustainability 2020, 12, 4035. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lee, J.; Bagheri, B. A cyber-physical systems architecture for industry. Manuf. Lett. 2015, 3, 18–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sogari, G.; Pucci, T.; Aquilani, B.; Zanni, L. Millennial generation and environmental sustainability: The role of social media in the consumer purchasing behavior for wine. Sustainability 2017, 9, 1911. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Drath, R.; Horch, A. Industrie 4.0: Hit or hype? IEEE Ind. Electron. Mag. 2014, 8, 56–58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kabugo, J.C.; Jämsä-Jounela, S.-L.; Schiemann, R.; Binder, C. Industry 4.0 based process data analytics platform: A waste-to-energy plant case study. Int. J. Electr. Power Energy Syst. 2020, 115, 1–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chen, H.; Zhang, M.; Xue, K.; Xu, G.; Yang, Y.; Wang, Z.; Liu, W.; Liu, T. An innovative waste-to-energy system integrated with a coal-fired power plant. Energy 2020, 194, 1–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- D’Adamo, I.; Falcone, P.M.; Ferella, F. A socio-economic analysis of biomethane in the transport sector: The case of Italy. Waste Manag. 2019, 95, 102–115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Falcone, P.M.; Lopolito, A.; Sica, E. Instrument mix for energy transition: A method for policy formulation. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Chang. 2019, 148, 119706. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Benitez, G.B.; Ayala, N.F.; Frank, A.G. Industry 4.0 innovation ecosystems: An evolutionary perspective on value cocreation. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 2020, 228, 1–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Added Value to Consumers | Additional Values to Companies |
---|---|
Enhanced customization [26,27,28]. | Improved efficiency [26,27]. |
Better customer experience [29]. Knowledge sharing increased among them [30]. Changing needs of consumers supported [31]. | Boosted synergy (when the structure is decoupled into subsystems with very little interdependence) [32]. |
Reduced cost [33]. Easier compliance [34]. Quality products, hence a high standard of living [31]. Job opportunities created [35]. | Enhanced integration through data flow, thus promoting a more flexible structure and data swap among all the elements [2]. Improved productivity and efficiency, opportunity creation through innovation, flexibility, and agility [36,37]. |
The advent of novel business models which allow new ways of value creation; according to reference [28], these are cloud-based, service-oriented process-oriented business models [38]. | Intelligent learning analysis promoted, which allows devices and machines to develop learning capacities and act in response to different situations based on previous experiences [39]. |
End-to-end numeral integration, allowing the integration of business processes across the entire value chain, including the factory floor and services using CPSs [40]. | Simulated and modeled impacts of process-steps; the possibility to design and test new plants before setting up by virtualization [41]. |
Deployment Scenario | Operation Scenario | SDGs Relation Scenario | Long-Term Scenario |
---|---|---|---|
Digitization [2] | Real-time data | Renewable energy | Decrease (-) |
Integration [2] | Customization | Innovative infrastructure | Increase (+) |
Automation [2] | Smart production | Responsive consumption | Decrease (-) |
Industry 4.0 | Attention/Action | Effects Flow | Impact on Environment |
---|---|---|---|
Automation [2] | Need for new equipment | More materials required | Negative |
More energy required | Negative | ||
Obsolete equipment | Disposal or recycled | Negative | |
More fuel to transport | Negative | ||
Digitization [2] | New device required | More materials required | Negative |
More energy required | Negative | ||
Obsolete equipment | Disposal or recycled | Negative | |
More energy required | Negative | ||
Integration [2] | New device required | More material required | Negative |
Disposal or recycled | Negative | ||
Obsolete equipment | More material required | Negative | |
Disposal or recycled | Negative |
Requirements of Industry 4.0 | ||
---|---|---|
Industry 4.0 [49]. | Smart production | Production and customization |
Internet of things and CPS integration [59].Real-time data control [56]. | On-demand production and customization [19]. | |
Needs [2]. | Needs massive data [62]. | Dynamic configuration processes [56]. |
Flows [2]. | Energy flows increase [63]. | Needs massive data [62]. |
Trend [2]. | Negative impact [35]. | Negative impact [35]. |
Elements | Opportunities | Effects | Impact |
---|---|---|---|
Smart production [64]. The integration of real-time data control [2]. | Vertical [65]. | Material and energy flow [2]. | + |
Horizontal [66]. | Material and energy use [67]. | + | |
Collection data [68]. | Subjectively by customers | + | |
Data analytics [68]. | Material consumption [42]. | Decreased flow of materials [67]. | + |
Energy consumption [42]. | Decreased energy [67]. | + | |
Maintenance [68]. | Decreased energy [67]. | + | |
Additive manufacturing [69,70,71]. | Prototyping [19]. Tool and shape manufacturing [72]. Final item manufacturing [73]. Part industrialization [74]. | Decreased waste [67]. | + |
Decreased flow of materials [67]. | + | ||
Decreased waste [67]. | + | ||
Decreased fluids and forging. | + | ||
Increase energy [75]. | - | ||
On-demand production and customization [76,57]. | Elimination of the undesired products [69]. | Decreased material and energy [67]. | + |
Disruptive business model [77]. | The extended life cycle of products [75]. | + | |
Blockchain technology [78,79]. | Transparency/decentralization/reliable information [78]. | Increased energy flows [75]. |
SDG | Integration | Enhanced Opportunities towards Environmental Sustainability | Effect on Flows | ||||||
Digitization (IoT and CPS) | Monitoring and data collecting | Big data analytics | Additive manufacturing | Novel business models | On-demand production | Blockchain | |||
SDG 7 | √ | √ | √ | Implementation of smart grids [36]. Implementation of life cycle assessments [80]. | Decreased energy flows [2]. Increased renewable energy [81]. | ||||
SDG 9 | √ | √ | √ | √ | Improvement of weak points of additive manufacturing (energy and recyclability) [2]. Extended integration with the circular economy [2]. | Decreased energy flows [2]. Decreased material flows [2]. Decreased waste flows [2]. Decrease end-of-life products [36]. | |||
SDG 12 | √ | √ | √ | Production of reliable and transparent sustainability reports, on Industry 4.0 in manufacturing sector [2]. | Increased reliable data [82]. Decreased material flows [2]. Decreased waste flows [36]. | ||||
SDG 13 | √ | √ | √ | √ | Implementation of smart grids [82]. Implementation of life cycle assessments [83]. Blockchain-enabled emissions trading [20]. | Decreased energy flows [2]. Increased renewable energy [70]. Decreased GHG emission [51]. |
Key Factor | Response | |
---|---|---|
Optimistic | Pessimistic | |
Device demand [2]. | Increased recycling [84]. | Increased raw materials flow in the fabrication [2]. |
Consumer concerns [2]. | More awareness of sustainability [85]. | - |
Company infrastructure [2]. | Homogeneity in terms of automation and digitization [86]. | Heterogeneity in terms of automation and digitization [24]. |
Geography [2]. | Spatially homogeneous adoption of the technology [2]. | Spatially homogeneous adoption of the technology [2]. |
Exchange of technology between developed and developing countries [87]. | Technology concentrated in developed countries [88]. | |
Equipment obsolescence [2]. | - | Increased flows of products to be disposed of, recycled [2]. |
- | Increased fuel for transportation (towards disposal or recycling) [89]. | |
Novel business models [2]. | Promote value co-creation Promote pro-environmental markets [77]. | - |
Unskilled workforce [2]. | Focus on training and formation [90]. | - |
Raw material demand [2]. | Research substitutes [91]. | - |
- | - |
Industry 4.0 Disadvantages | Industry 4.0 Advantages | Industry 4.0 Sustainability |
---|---|---|
Capital [44]. | Customization [19]. | Robotic-assisted production [22]. |
Security [59]. | Optimization [84]. | Big-data-driven quality control [59]. |
Privacy [92]. | Pushing research [56]. | Product line simulation [66]. |
Staff education [93]. | Vertical networking [94]. | Predictive maintenance [68]. |
Reluctance to adopt Industry 4.0 [95]. | Horizontal networking [94]. | Self-driven logistics vehicles [29]. |
Data ownership [37]. | Engineering entire value chain [22]. | A machine as a tool to high efficiency in production [57]. |
Dimension | Advantages | Disadvantages |
---|---|---|
Flexibility and integration of production [56]. | Costly to adopt and manage [90]. | |
Environment | Increased use of smart gadgets (IoT) Industry 4.0 [91]. | Technical skills required [96]. |
Efficient production increases economic stability and sustainability [57]. | High pollution of the environment [92]. | |
Large markets with the better financial performance [56]. | Interference of the ecosystem [93]. | |
Ensures quality products [31]. | Disposal of the waste harmful to society [69]. | |
High revenue through vertical and horizontal integration [30]. | Minimum compliance with regulations and laws by companies [97]. | |
Industry 4.0 has reduced production time hence efficiency [37]. | The intensity of Industry 4.0 has led to deforestation [82]. | |
Customization and digitization [77]. | Health-related diseases [98]. | |
Corporate social responsibility is undertaken by companies towards consumers [42] | Ground and water service contamination [96]. |
© 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Oláh, J.; Aburumman, N.; Popp, J.; Khan, M.A.; Haddad, H.; Kitukutha, N. Impact of Industry 4.0 on Environmental Sustainability. Sustainability 2020, 12, 4674. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12114674
Oláh J, Aburumman N, Popp J, Khan MA, Haddad H, Kitukutha N. Impact of Industry 4.0 on Environmental Sustainability. Sustainability. 2020; 12(11):4674. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12114674
Chicago/Turabian StyleOláh, Judit, Nemer Aburumman, József Popp, Muhammad Asif Khan, Hossam Haddad, and Nicodemus Kitukutha. 2020. "Impact of Industry 4.0 on Environmental Sustainability" Sustainability 12, no. 11: 4674. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12114674
APA StyleOláh, J., Aburumman, N., Popp, J., Khan, M. A., Haddad, H., & Kitukutha, N. (2020). Impact of Industry 4.0 on Environmental Sustainability. Sustainability, 12(11), 4674. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12114674