Next Article in Journal
When Sustainability Becomes an Order Winner: Linking Supply Uncertainty and Sustainable Supply Chain Strategies
Previous Article in Journal
Simulation Modeling of the Sustainable Supply Chain
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Characterization of Olive Oil Tourism as a Type of Special Interest Tourism: An Analysis from the Tourist Experience Perspective

by
Juan Antonio Parrilla-González
1,*,
Eva María Murgado-Armenteros
2 and
Francisco José Torres-Ruiz
2
1
Department of Economics, University of Jaén, 23071 Jaén, Spain
2
Department of Management, Marketing and Sociology, University of Jaén, 23071 Jaén, Spain
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Sustainability 2020, 12(15), 6008; https://doi.org/10.3390/su12156008
Submission received: 27 May 2020 / Revised: 22 June 2020 / Accepted: 13 July 2020 / Published: 27 July 2020

Abstract

:
Olive oil tourism is an emerging activity that is sparking a growing interest among tourists seeking to partake in this experience and the self-fulfilment it offers. An ever-greater number of olive oil mills are diversifying their businesses to incorporate this type of tourism. In this article, olive oil tourism is characterized as a type of special interest tourism (SIT), under a demand-side approach. Based on quantitative research carried out with olive oil tourists, which examined the aspects of the destination they value, as well as their preferences and motivations for consumption, this article proposes four dimensions that are considered key for characterizing olive oil tourism as SIT: experience, sustainability awareness, the promotion of local culture, and the image of status and prestige held by the tourist. This proposal to characterize olive oil tourism as a type of SIT can contribute to the development of more effective and successful marketing strategies that orient olive oil tourism towards services that tourists value and demand. In turn, this will have an impact in terms of wealth creation for rural olive oil producing areas.

1. Introduction

Olive oil tourism is a burgeoning activity, the emergence of which is linked to products developed in rural olive producing areas, offering an opportunity to diversify the olive monoculture. In some of these areas, olive cultivation is the main source of livelihood, and olive oil tourism represents an avenue for diversification for the olive oil companies established there.
Such is the interest in this type of tourism—from a social, economic, and even political viewpoint—that many oil mills and cooperatives are starting to develop this activity. This entails converting the mill to a place that is no longer merely a factory but a unique space where visitors can enjoy a tourist experience. These spaces also serve as informative components, providing insights into the culture of olive oil, its health properties, and the cultural and social heritage of the environment where the activity is carried out. At the same time, they encourage the tourist to become ambassadors for this product, as it satisfies their needs and wants and lives up to their expectations.
Very few analyses in the literature have considered olive oil tourism as special interest tourism (hereinafter SIT). Nevertheless, in recent years, some studies have started to emerge which link this type of tourism with the characteristics of SIT; they do so on the basis of the different activities included in olive oil tourism, which make it a type of complex tourism with connections to different types of specific tourism [1]. Said studies have attempted to characterize olive oil tourism from a supply-side perspective; that is, by analyzing the activities and services provided. However, there are no studies to date that adopt a demand-side approach in characterizing olive oil tourism as SIT, taking into account the values and motivations of the tourist.
In the present study, we propose a classification of olive oil tourism as a type of SIT, based on the olive oil tourist’s opinions on the aspects of the destination he/she particularly appreciates, his/her values, preferences and interests, and motivations for engaging in this tourist activity. This information enables the identification and analysis of four key indicators, on the basis of which olive oil tourism can be characterized as SIT. This characterization can help offer a better understanding of this type of tourism and guide companies’ marketing strategies. These indicators are as follows: (1) sustainability, (2) experience, (3) promotion of the local culture, and (4) an image of prestige/status. The more closely olive oil tourism is aligned with these indicators, the more likely it is that this tourism activity will succeed and will be more oriented towards the olive oil tourist—in other words, towards the market.

2. Olive Oil Tourism as Special Interest Tourism

The term olive oil tourism was coined in the 1980s and referred to the transformation of traditional factories towards other business models that were more open and involved more contact with the consumer. It had previously been known as farm tourism [2], but the term was subsequently refined given the need to market the olive producing regions of the European Mediterranean basin, Australia, the United States, and the Southern Cone countries, primarily Argentina and Uruguay [3,4,5] and to generate olive oil specifiers.
In general terms, olive oil tourism can be defined as a set of tourist activities that revolve around olive oil. These include visits to the olive groves—sometimes coinciding with the olive harvest—and the oil mills, tasting the oils, and trying typical regional dishes in which olive oil is the star ingredient, along with other cultural and nature-related activities that allow visitors to engage with the environment of the region in question [6].
As it is a type of tourism associated with different types of general tourism and even with niche tourism markets, we can consider olive oil tourism as a type of SIT, the production of which is a process guided by consumers’ specific interests and motivations [7].
Thus, it is associated with rural or nature-based tourism [3,8]. In addition, it combines with cultural tourism and health tourism and can be framed as thematic tourism, also helping to generate sales of agri-food products linked to this activity [3,9]. Olive oil tourism can even be understood within the context of gastronomic tourism [10].
Authors such as Jung et al. [11] underline the complexity of this type of tourism and the existence of different degrees of specialty. However, given its association with different types of general tourism, olive oil tourism can be considered an SIT; indeed, according to Soleimani [12], this form of tourism meets the needs of specific markets by focusing on diverse experiences and activities that fall outside the scope of general interest tourism.
It can thus be seen that SIT has become established as a valuable market niche for multi-product destinations and a central activity for single-product destinations [13,14]; this enables a more thorough characterization of olive oil tourism, a topic that to date has received little attention in the literature.
According to the World Tourism Organization (UNWTO), Special Interest Tourism (SIT) is specialized tourism for groups or individuals seeking to gain knowledge and have experiences by engaging in specific activities. Given the characteristics and knowledge of the target audience for these activities, these tourists can be considered “active” or “experiential” people, who seek specific activities framed within a certain way of being, thinking, or acting. Therefore, this type of leisure experience is related to special, unusual activities, in distinctive settings, and it is particularly linked to a local community and a specific territory [15,16]. The desire to enjoy leisure interests or develop a new interest in a particular destination is central to the definition of SIT [17]. In short, these are tourists who are interested in spending their leisure time enjoying the diversity and uniqueness of the activities offered by this type of tourism [18,19,20].
Such activities include visiting an olive orchard and even taking part in harvesting the olives (depending on the time of year); visiting oil mills, interpretation centers or museums; product tasting and food pairings; learning first-hand about the local products and buying them to eat later. All these activities that form part of the SIT create a connection between the tourist and the territory. An identity is forged as a special interest destination, based on its natural, cultural, gastronomic, and ethnographic heritage, thereby offering the visitor a unique experience [21,22,23].
To summarize, we can characterize SIT as a specific, experience-oriented tourism centered on activities that allow tourists to expand their knowledge, meet their leisure needs, and engage in a certain activity in a particular area and/or at a specific point in time [24].
On the basis of the unique characteristics of SIT and those of olive oil tourism, we have identified four key dimensions that would allow us to characterize olive oil tourism as a type of SIT [25,26,27,28,29]. These dimensions are sustainability and environmental awareness; unique, sensory experience; the promotion of local culture; and an image of status and prestige (Figure 1).
Thus, based on the above figure (Figure 1), our research model aims to explain the behavior of the olive oil tourist by incorporating the general values of the destination along with the values of the tourist and his/her motivations. We explore the possible relationship between these elements and the four dimensions of the SIT model (sustainability, experience, promotion of local culture, and image and status).
First of all, it is worth underlining that olive oil tourism is an intangible, sustainable element, insofar as tourism linked to agricultural activities is based on sustainability, respect for the environment, and awareness about a society with certain values linked to the land [25,26].
With olive oil tourism, the connection to the land means that the region’s development is somewhat influenced by the arrival of tourists descending on the local scene; this connection enriches the consumers’ experience and facilitates the development of the local culture as a differentiating element [27,28,29].
Another fundamental feature that relates olive oil tourism with SIT is its ability to generate a 360-degree experience for the tourist, from the source to the production of the end product, involving all the senses (taste, smell, touch, sight, and sound); this guarantees an all-round, unique experience, within exclusive reach of a particular niche market with certain special interests, meaning that it is oriented towards a particular audience [30,31,32].
Lastly, in terms of motivations for olive oil tourism, tourists may opt to engage in this activity for cultural and interpersonal reasons, as well as a desire for status and prestige, especially if they want to set themselves apart by undertaking a unique activity. They may also be driven by curiosity and the wish to acquire specific knowledge. At the same time, they are activating the senses linked to olive oil, which is reflected as an added value for the leisure consumer and generates a desire to demonstrate this [3,30,33].
There is thus a need to empirically confirm whether olive oil tourism can be considered a type of SIT with a series of specific features. In this context, first of all, it would have to be the case that all the dimensions of SIT were reflected in the tourists’ opinions or perceptions. Secondly, given its specific nature, some dimensions in olive oil tourism should carry more weight or importance than others, representing its uniqueness in relation to other types of SIT. These two assumptions can be encapsulated by two research objectives: (1) to analyze the presence of these dimensions in the tourists’ motivations; (2) to examine differences in the relative importance of these dimensions, both within olive oil tourism and with respect to other types of tourism.
Finally, the overall perception of the olive oil tourism activity and experience is based on the interrelation between all its component dimensions, such that an improvement in one dimension can positively affect the perception of the rest of the dimensions. Thus, a third objective is to study the potential relationships between dimensions. The findings could be extremely useful for determining which dimension should be addressed to improve the overall experience. This in turn has repercussions in terms of the business management of companies dedicated to olive oil tourism and more generally regarding the management of territories in olive producing areas, thereby contributing to an improvement in rural development.
In summary, this paper analyzes the four abovementioned dimensions of olive oil tourism in order to propose a possible theoretical–conceptual model of the classification of olive oil tourism as SIT, which could be of use to olive oil companies and rural olive oil producing areas.

3. Materials and Methods

In order to carry out this research, a quantitative methodology was designed, based on a personal questionnaire administered to 471 visitors engaging in an olive oil tourism activity, in 10 survey locations chosen from the set of oil mills, museums, and interpretation centers in the province of Jaén (Spain). Jaén is the world’s leading olive oil producing region and is known as the world capital of olive oil. This province, home to more than 66 million olive trees, generates between 15% to 20% of the world’s production of olive oil [34,35].
The questionnaire was given out when the visitors were engaged in the olive oil tourism activity. The tourists filled out the questionnaire on their own, although the administrators of the questionnaire were on-hand in case the tourists had any doubts.
The fieldwork was carried out between April 2018 and February 2019. The questionnaire was distributed in three languages (English, French, and Spanish) and a pre-test of 25 questionnaires was conducted to detect possible errors or elements that could cause confusion (Table 1).
In order to explore in more depth the key dimensions of olive oil tourism as a type of SIT, a discussion group was organized, with experts and professionals in the field of tourism. This qualitative research, which was conducted prior to the quantitative study, enabled the configuration of the dimensions by which to characterize olive oil tourism as a type of SIT. To this end, the information used came from a set of variables related to the behavior of the olive oil tourist which capture his/her opinion on the general values of the destination, his/her personal values and preferences, and reasons for engaging in the tourist activity. The selection of items used to measure the four dimensions (sustainability, experience, promotion of local culture, and image of prestige/status) is shown in Table 2. The items selected for each dimension were measured on a scale of 1 to 5 (not very important–very important).
The IBM (International Business Machine) software SPSS (Stadistical Package for Social Sciences) was used for data tabulation and analysis. To analyze the four dimensions, a descriptive analysis of means was carried out and the correlation between them was studied using factor analysis and Bartlett’s test of sphericity.

4. Results and Discussions

4.1. Descriptive Model—Simple Means

We begin the analysis by presenting the descriptive statistics of the dimensions of olive oil tourism as SIT in the theoretical–conceptual model proposed in this article.
High values are obtained for the means in all four dimensions (Table 3), which initially indicates, before moving on to a more in-depth analysis, that the theoretical–conceptual model proposed in this study is aligned with the proposals set out in our research objectives. As such, we can state that there is a sound relationship between SIT and olive oil tourism.
It is crucial to take into account the personal character and active nature of the tourist in olive oil tourism, tied to their involvement in special, unique activities that are linked to social, cultural, and environmental values. The high values obtained for the means reinforce the idea that olive oil tourism can be considered a type of SIT. These results are consistent with those of other studies that—albeit using a different method based on a panel of experts—show that olive oil tourism corresponds to SIT and is derived from three types of general interest tourism: rural, nature, and cultural tourism [1].
Three of the four means are above three, with culture showing a lower weight and therefore less importance than status, sustainability, and experience. The proposed research objectives are thus validated (Table 4).
The correlations between pairs of dimensions were then analyzed (Table 5), and a principal component analysis was carried out to explore whether we can in fact refer to a single dimension that can be encompassed under the term “general experience”.
As can be seen, in the proposed model of olive oil tourism as a type of SIT, all the means show a correlation; hence, we can proceed to explore in greater depth the research objectives set out above and present our results.
The macrodimension termed “special interest tourism” is configured as a model of consumer experiences; as can be seen, the constituent dimensions of this type of tourism are related insofar as they are reflective indicators of this experience. This issue is relevant, especially at management level, as it determines whether improvement in one dimension will positively affect the set of SIT dimensions, given the proportional link in the model. Thus, as indicated by Soleimani [12], adapting activities to make them more accessible and to improve the tourist experience in places regarded as destinations for culinary tours or agritourism will create an SIT centered around tourists’ specific needs, with obvious implications for management.

4.2. KMO (Kaiser Meyer Oclean) and Bartlett’s Test of Sphericity

Bartlett’s test of sphericity was then performed in order to study another of the proposed research objectives; as can be observed, significant correlations are found. The results of the dependence among variables indicate that the oil mills, defined as the spaces where tourists take part in olive oil tourism, would have to fully manage the most important dimension, whether experience or sustainability, in order to ensure that the olive oil tourist has a better experience (Table 6).
To this end, Bartlett’s test of sphericity indicates that, at the management level, it is important to emphasize one dimension, thereby improving the correlation and projection of the other variables. This implies that, at company level, resources could be channeled into one of these dimensions—in this case, the most important ones are experience and sustainability—coherently combining the resources and capabilities for the olive oil tourism products and grouping the four dimensions together into one (Table 7).
In short, the results clearly show the existence of significant correlations, indicating that the four dimensions could be grouped under a factor that accounts for more than half of the variance in the data (Table 8). An interpretation of this finding is that the valuation, perception, and, for practical purposes, the management of the olive oil tourism activity can be dealt with altogether or, in other words, that improvements in one of the four dimensions studied can have repercussions on the rest.
In light of these results, the impact in terms of an improvement in management is substantial as the focus can be centered on one of the four dimensions, especially the ones that carry more weight. As such, by fulfilling the research objectives proposed here, we show that companies who commit to bolstering their strategies aimed at enhancing the tourist experience in the oil mills, or to promoting sustainable values of olive oil tourism products, will enjoy greater success in the implementation of these emerging new activities.

5. Conclusions

This study analyzes olive oil tourism as a type of special interest tourism (SIT). In accordance with the conceptual proposal presented here, it can be concluded that the two key dimensions in the characterization of olive oil tourism as SIT are experience and sustainability. These two indicators have the greatest weight and are where companies should center their attention in terms of their olive oil tourism offer, bearing in mind the importance that the olive oil tourist assigns to these dimensions.
These conclusions have implications from a theoretical and practical perspective.
At a theoretical level, this study represents a step forward in the efforts to characterize olive oil tourism as a type of SIT, with links to different types of tourism. Moreover, it is shown that experience and sustainability should be key variables in the configuration of the olive oil tourism offer. This provides impetus to experiential tourism products and the positioning of this type of activity in more distinctive segments such as “foodie tourism”. At the same time, the findings will encourage companies to commit to preserving the environment, conserving the ethnological heritage and showcasing the local gastronomy, consequently contributing to the development of rural, olive oil producing communities.
At a practical level, this research has implications for both public administration and private or corporate management. With regard to the former, it could contribute to the promotion of rural development plans, based on the olive oil tourism experience as one of the key dimensions. Furthermore, it could lead to olive grove landscapes being nominated for inclusion on UNESCO’s list of intangible cultural heritage of humanity. The scope of UNESCO’s work in this regard centers on the tourist use, showcasing, and conservation of unique spaces—in this case, olive groves and olive oil heritage—with the aim of bolstering the cultural heritage value and promoting local culture.
From a business perspective, olive oil tourism is a way for olive oil producing companies to diversify their businesses. To this end, they should design experiential tourism products and collaborate with tourist entities in the destination, whether other olive oil mills, restaurants, or accommodation providers, thereby facilitating the complete experience as a destination and special interest tourism. On the other hand, this study can help encourage companies to allocate more resources to implementing environmental conservation measures through integrated production techniques, involvement in sustainable projects, and the production of organic olive oils, all of which are closely aligned with olive oil tourists’ awareness and the aim of supporting the “experience” dimension based on sustainable values.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, J.A.P.-G. and E.M.M.A.; methodology, F.J.T.-R.; software, F.J.T.-R.; validation, J.A.P.-G., E.M.M.-A. and F.J.T.-R.; formal analysis, F.J.T.-R.; investigation, J.A.P.-G.; resources, E.M.M.-A.; data curation, J.A.P.-G.; writing—original draft preparation, J.A.P.-G.; writing—review and editing, E.M.M.-A.; visualization, F.J.T.-R.; supervision, F.J.T.-R.; funding acquisition, E.M.M.-A. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by Instituto de Estudios Gienenses, through the research project “Análisis de la demanda y perspectivas del oleoturismo en la provincia de Jaén” (Analysis of the demand for and perspectives on olive oil tourism in the province of Jaén), granted in 2017.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank the anonymous reviewers for their valuable comments and suggestions on how to improve the quality of the paper.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Pulido-Fernández, J.I.; Casado-Montilla, J.; Carrillo-Hidalgo, I. Introducing olive-oil tourism as a special interest tourism. Heliyon 2019, 5, e02975. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  2. Murphy, P.E. Tourism: A Community Approach, 1st ed.; Routlage: Methuen, MA, USA; London, UK, 1985. [Google Scholar]
  3. Orgaz-Agüera, F.; Moral Cuadra, S.; López-Guzmán, T.; Cañero Morales, P. Estudio de la demanda existente en torno al oleoturismo. El caso de Andalucía. Cuadernos de Turismo 2017, 39, 437–453. [Google Scholar]
  4. Northcote, J.; Alonso, A.D. Factors underlying farm diversification: The case of Western Australia’s olive farmers. Agric. Human Values 2011, 28, 237–246. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Millan, M.G.; Arjona, J.; Amador, L. A new market segment for olive oil: Olive oil tourism in the South of Spain. J. Agric. Sci. 2014, 5, 179–185. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  6. Murgado, E.M. Turning food into a gastronomic experience: Olive oil tourism. Options Mediterr. 2013, 106, 97–109. [Google Scholar]
  7. Agarwal, S.; Busby, G.; Huang, R. Special interest tourism: An introduction. In Special Interest Tourism: Concepts, Contexts and Cases; CABI: London, UK, 2018; pp. 1–17. [Google Scholar]
  8. Aybar, R. Proyecto Oleoturismo: Una Red Europea Para la Promoción de la Cultura del Olivo; Diputación Provincial de Jaén: Jaén, Spain, 2004. [Google Scholar]
  9. Ruiz Guerra, I. Análisis Cuantitativo y Cualitativo del Significado del Aceite de Oliva. Una Aproximación Desde el Punto de Vista del Consumidor; Servicios de Publicación de la Universidad de Granada: Granada, Spain, 2010. [Google Scholar]
  10. Henderson, J.C. Food tourism reviewed. Br. Food J. 2009, 111, 317–326. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Jun, W.; Mao-Ying, W. How special is special interest tourism–and how special are special interest tourists? A perspective article in a Chinese context. Curr. Issues Tour. 2020, 1–5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Soleimani, S.; Bruwer, J.; Gross, M.J.; Lee, R. Astro-tourism conceptualisation as special-interest tourism (SIT) field: A phenomenological approach. Curr. Issues Tour. 2019, 22, 2299–2314. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Ma, S.; Kirilenko, A.; Stepchenkova, S. Special interest tourism is not so special after all: Big data evidence from the 2017 great American Solar Eclipse. Tour. Manag. 2020, 77, 1–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. McKercher, B.; Chan, A. How special is special interest tourism? J. Travel Res. 2005, 44, 21–31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Stebbins, R.A. Serious leisure: A conceptual statement. Pac. Sociol. Rev. 1982, 25, 251–272. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Weiler, B.; Hall, M. Special Interest Tourism; Belhaven Press: London, UK, 1992. [Google Scholar]
  17. Jin, X.; Sparks, B. Barriers to offering special interest tour products to the Chinese outbound group market. Tour. Manag. 2017, 59, 205–215. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Okanogan. Cultural Tourism and Cultural Industries; Okanogan Cultural Corridor: Kelowna, BC, Canada, 2003. [Google Scholar]
  19. Keefe, C. History and Culture Significant and Growing Part of the US Travel Experience; Travel Industry Association of America: Washington, DC, USA, 2003; Available online: http://www.hotel-online.com/News/PR2002_1st/Jan02_HistoryTravelers.html (accessed on 15 February 2020).
  20. Douglas, N.; Douglas, N.; Derret, R. Special Interest Tourism; Wiley: Melbourne, Australia, 2001. [Google Scholar]
  21. Cañero, P.M.; López-Guzmán, T.J.; Moral, S.; Orgaz, F. Análisis de la Demanda de oleoturismo de Andalucia/Analysis of demand of olive oil tourism in Andalusia. Rev. Estud. Reg. 2015, 104, 104–133. [Google Scholar]
  22. Chuang, S.T. Rural tourism: Perspectives from social exchange theory. Soc. Behav. Personal. 2010, 38, 1313–1322. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Muresan, I.C.; Oroian, C.F.; Harun, R.; Arion, F.H.; Porutiu, A.; Chiciudean, G.O.; Todea, A.; Lile, R. Local residents’ attitude toward sustainable rural tourism development. Sustainability 2016, 8, 100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  24. Brotherton, B.; Himmetoglu, B. Beyond destinations—special interest tourism. J. Tour. Hosp. Res. 1997, 8, 11–30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Alonso, A.D.; Krasjsic, V. Food heritage down under: Olive growers as Mediterranean “food ambassadors”. J. Herit. Tour. 2013, 8, 158–171. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Telfer, D.; Wall, G. Linkages between tourism and food production. Ann. Tour. Res. 1996, 23, 635–653. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Kivela, J.; Crotts, J. Tourism and gastronomy: Gastronomy’s influence on how tourist experience a destination. J. Herit. Tour. Res. 2006, 30, 354–377. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Connell, J. Toddlers, tourism and Tobermory: Destination marketing issues and TV-induced tourism. Tour. Manag. 2005, 26, 749–755. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Crockett, S.R.; Wood, L.J. Brand Western Australia: Holiday of an entirely different nature. In Destination Branding: Creating the Unique Destination Proposition; Morgan, N., Pritchard, A., Pride, R., Eds.; Butterworth-Heinemann: New York, NY, USA, 2002; pp. 124–147. [Google Scholar]
  30. Boniface, P. Tasting Tourism: Travelling for Food and Drink; Ashgate: Burlington, UK, 2003. [Google Scholar]
  31. Weber, K. Outdoor adventure tourism. A review of research approaches. Ann. Tour. Res. 2001, 28, 360–377. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Getz, D. Explore Wine Tourism, Management, Development and Destination; Cognizant Communication Corporation: New York, NY, USA, 2000. [Google Scholar]
  33. McIntosh, R.W.; Goeldner, C.; Ritchie, B. Tourism: Principles, Practices, Philosophies; John Wiley & Sons: New York, NY, USA, 1995. [Google Scholar]
  34. AICA, Agencia de Información y Control Alimentarios. Available online: https://www.aica.gob.es/ (accessed on 15 June 2020).
  35. COI, International Olive Council. Available online: https://www.internationaloliveoil.org/ (accessed on 15 June 2020).
Figure 1. Olive oil tourism characterized as special interest tourism (Source: own elaboration based on [3,25,26,27,28]).
Figure 1. Olive oil tourism characterized as special interest tourism (Source: own elaboration based on [3,25,26,27,28]).
Sustainability 12 06008 g001
Table 1. Technical data sheet.
Table 1. Technical data sheet.
Sample471 Valid Surveys
ProcedureConvenience sampling
Time periodApril 2018 to February 2019
Location10 survey locations: oil mills, museums, and interpretation centers in Jaén (Spain)
Sampling Error ±4.60%, under SRS (simple random sample) for overall percentages (p = q = 0.5); k = 2
Source: own elaboration.
Table 2. Dimensions of olive oil tourism as a type of special interest tourism (SIT): variables and selected items.
Table 2. Dimensions of olive oil tourism as a type of special interest tourism (SIT): variables and selected items.
Dimensions Based on SIT ModelOlive Oil Tourist Behavior Variables Selected Items
SustainabilityDestination valuesConservation of the environment
Attractiveness of the natural environment
Cleanliness
Proximity to other areas such as natural parks
General values of the olive oil touristI’m a tourist who looks for destinations without many people.I’m a tourist who looks for activities in nature.
Motivations of the olive oil touristTo be in touch with nature and enjoy an olive grove landscape
ExperienceDestination valuesHospitality
Restaurants and catering
Public safety
Accommodation
Infrastructure and transport communication
Accessibility of facilities and areas to visit
Value for money
General values of the olive oil touristI’m a tourist who looks for destinations without many people.
I’m a tourist who looks for new places to explore.
I’m a tourist who likes to do different activities everyday.
I’m a tourist who looks for quality over quantity in tourist activities.
Motivations of the olive oil touristTo enrich my own life experience
To learn about olive oil culture
To do a different tourist activity (novelty)
CultureDestination valuesAttractiveness of the cultural and heritage environment
General values of the olive oil touristI’m a tourist who likes to mingle with people (local people, other tourists…).
Motivations of the olive oil touristTo find out about the olive oil manufacturing process
To learn about olive oil culture
To taste the oil where it was made
To try the local cuisine
To connect with other people interested in finding out about olive oil
To find out about the origins and environment of a designation of origin
To find out about the cultural and heritage offerings of the producing area
StatusGeneral values of the olive oil touristI’m a tourist who looks for destinations without many people.
I’m a tourist who looks for quality over quantity in tourist activities.
I’m a tourist who looks for exclusive activities, for fewer days.
Motivations of the olive oil touristTo enrich my own life experience
To gain specific knowledge of olive oil
To do a different tourist activity (novelty)
To try the local cuisine
Source: own elaboration.
Table 3. Descriptive model—simple means.
Table 3. Descriptive model—simple means.
NMinimumMaximumMeanStandard Deviation
SUSTAINABILITY4621.575.003.72970.60954
EXPERIENCE4551.775.003.89470.47619
CULTURE4651.115.002.65140.93364
STATUS4691.005.003.19490.81454
Valid N (list wise)447
Source: own elaboration.
Table 4. Single sample test with values greater than μ >3.
Table 4. Single sample test with values greater than μ >3.
tdf(Degree Free)Sig.(Level of Significance) (Two-Tailed)Difference in Means95% Confidence Interval of the Difference
LowerUpper
SUSTAINABILITY25.7334610.0000.729750.67400.7855
EXPERIENCE40.0774540.0000.894670.85080.9385
CULTURE−8.0524640.000−0.34863−0.4337−0.2635
STATUS5.1834680.0000.194940.12100.2689
Source: own elaboration.
Table 5. Descriptive model of the means of indicators in a paired samples test.
Table 5. Descriptive model of the means of indicators in a paired samples test.
MeanNStandard DeviationStandard ERROR of the Mean
Pair 1SUSTAINAB3.73584520.605930.02850
EXPERIENCE3.89554520.473690.02228
Pair 2SUSTAINAB3.73904570.602290.02817
CULTURE2.64094570.927080.04337
Pair 3SUSTAINAB3.73164610.608840.02836
STATUS3.18784610.814670.03794
Pair 4EXPERIENCE3.89924510.474500.02234
CULTURE2.63094510.920520.04335
Pair 5EXPERIENCE3.89584540.476110.02234
STATUS3.18634540.807570.03790
Pair 6CULTURE2.65214640.934530.04338
STATUS3.20264640.810710.03764
Source: own elaboration.
Table 6. KMO Kaiser Meyer Oclean and Bartlett’s test.
Table 6. KMO Kaiser Meyer Oclean and Bartlett’s test.
Kaiser–Meyer–Olkin Measure of Sampling Adequacy0.702
Bartlett’s Test of SphericityApprox. chi-square440,221
df6
Sig.0.000
Source: own elaboration
Table 7. Total variance explained (Varimax).
Table 7. Total variance explained (Varimax).
ComponentInitial EigenvaluesExtraction Sums of Squared Loadings
Total% VarianceCumulative %Total% VarianceCumulative %
1
2
3
4
2.246
0.774
0.654
0.326
56.145
19.345
16.354
8.156
56.145
75.489
91.844
100.000
2.24656.14556.145
Extraction method: principal component analysis
Source: own elaboration.
Table 8. Component matrix.
Table 8. Component matrix.
Component
1
SUSTAINAB0.696
EXPERIENCE0.863
CULTURE0.590
STATUS0.817
Extraction method: principal component analysis.
a. 1 component extracted.
Source: own elaboration.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Parrilla-González, J.A.; Murgado-Armenteros, E.M.; Torres-Ruiz, F.J. Characterization of Olive Oil Tourism as a Type of Special Interest Tourism: An Analysis from the Tourist Experience Perspective. Sustainability 2020, 12, 6008. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12156008

AMA Style

Parrilla-González JA, Murgado-Armenteros EM, Torres-Ruiz FJ. Characterization of Olive Oil Tourism as a Type of Special Interest Tourism: An Analysis from the Tourist Experience Perspective. Sustainability. 2020; 12(15):6008. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12156008

Chicago/Turabian Style

Parrilla-González, Juan Antonio, Eva María Murgado-Armenteros, and Francisco José Torres-Ruiz. 2020. "Characterization of Olive Oil Tourism as a Type of Special Interest Tourism: An Analysis from the Tourist Experience Perspective" Sustainability 12, no. 15: 6008. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12156008

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop