A Study of the Spatial Form of Maling Village, Henan, China
Round 1
Reviewer 1 Report
Your paper should be relevant to an international audience and not only for Chinese scholars. You should cite international literature and compare your findings with similar international studies.
Methods should be described in detail.
The conclusion section is too long and you should reorganize the structure of your manuscript: 1) Introduction, 2) Materials and Methods, 3) Results, 4) Discussion, 5) Conclusions.
Include study limitations.
Author Response
Dear reviewer,
Thank you very much for your valuable comments on this article. We have answered these questions one by one according to the reviewer's requirements and carefully revised this article. Thank you very much for taking the time to read this manuscript. Your suggestions enable us to improve our work. All the questions are answered in the attachment. Please find my itemized response below, my response below, and my revision in the resubmitted file.
Thanks again!
sincerely yours,
Fengtiandu
Author Response File: 
Author Response.pdf
Reviewer 2 Report
The paper is well written and have a great scientific soundness for the journal.
Author Response
Dear Reviewer,
Thanks very much for taking your time to review this manuscript. Thank you for the recognition of our manuscript. We still make a lot of revision from the beginning to end. All the revision were marked in red colour, and thank you again for your review.
Thanks again!
Sincerely Yours,
Fengtian Du
Author Response File: Author Response.pdf
Reviewer 3 Report
Attached.
Comments for author File: Comments.pdf
Author Response
Dear Reviewer,
Thank you very much for your valuable comments on the article, we have answered the questions one by one in accordance with the requirements of the reviewers, and carefully revised the article. Thanks very much for taking your time to review this manuscript. Your suggestions have enabled us to improve our work. All questions are answered in the attachment. Please find my itemized responses in below and my responses in below and my revisions in the re-submitted files.
Thanks again!
Sincerely Yours,
Fengtian Du
Author Response File: Author Response.pdf
Round 2
Reviewer 1 Report
The paper has been improved. Thanks!
Reviewer 3 Report
It's okay, this is a much improved article, the authors have put a lot of new effort. I also want to emphasize a very professional response to the review. I am very happy that I could help the authors.
