Next Article in Journal
The State of Experimental Research on Community Interventions to Reduce Greenhouse Gas Emissions—A Systematic Review
Previous Article in Journal
From Dichotomy to an Integrated Approach: Cities’ Benefits of Integrating Climate Change Adaptation and Mitigation
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Sustainability
Volume 12
Issue 18
10.3390/su12187592
sustainability-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Availability and Feasibility of Water Desalination as a Non-Conventional Resource for Agricultural Irrigation in the MENA Region: A Review

by
Hassan A. Awaad
1,
Elsayed Mansour
1,
Mohammad Akrami
2,*,
Hassan E.S. Fath
3,
Akbar A. Javadi
2 and
Abdelazim Negm
4,*
1
Crop Science Department., Faculty of Agriculture, Zagazig University, Zagazig 44511, Egypt
2
Department of Engineering, University of Exeter, Exeter EX4 4QF, UK
3
Ex-Egypt-Japan University of Science and Technology (E-JUST), Borg El-Arab, Alexandria 21934, Egypt
4
Water and Water structures Engineering Department, Faculty of Engineering, Zagazig University, Zagazig 44519, Egypt
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Sustainability 2020, 12(18), 7592; https://doi.org/10.3390/su12187592
Submission received: 14 August 2020 / Revised: 12 September 2020 / Accepted: 13 September 2020 / Published: 15 September 2020
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Sustainable Management in Agricultural Irrigated Systems)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Many countries in the MENA region (Middle East and North Africa) are facing water scarcity, which poses a great challenge to agricultural production. Furthermore, water scarcity is projected to increase due to climate change, particularly in arid and semi-arid regions. The integration of solar power and water desalination systems in greenhouses to overcome water shortages is one of the preferred technologies in crop-growing areas. Crop growth control is done through sufficient management of environmental climatic variables as well as the quantity and quality of water and applied fertilisers with irrigation. Numerous crops such as cucumbers, tomatoes, peppers, lettuces, strawberries, flowers, and herbs can be grown under greenhouse conditions using desalinated water. This paper displays the state of the art in (i) solar-driven saltwater desalination to irrigate crops, (ii) the feasibility of water desalination for agriculture in the MENA region, (iii) the economics and environmental impacts of the desalination process, (iv) the quality of desalinated water compared with other non-conventional water resources and (v) recommendations for the future in the MENA region.

1. Introduction

The MENA region is one of the most responsive regions to climate change and its effects on water resources. Moreover, many countries in the MENA region are facing water scarcity, which impedes agricultural development. It is projected that the annual demand for water in the MENA region will increase almost five-fold from 42 to 200 km3 by 2050 as a result of population growth and the expected negative effects of climate change. Indeed, the amount of fresh water available to the citizens of MENA decreased by half from 3000 m3/capita to 1500 m3/capita from 1975 to 2001, largely due to rapid population growth. At present, a citizen in the MENA countries consumes slightly over 1000 m3, compared to the average global consumption, which reaches more than 7000 m3. In fact, most of the world’s top twenty water-limited countries are in the MENA region [1].
In Egypt, as in most Mediterranean countries, agricultural production suffers from a water shortage. This is exacerbated by increasing demand and the negative impacts of climate change [2,3,4]. In this context, Elsaeed [5] showed that it is crucial to obtain new alternative water resources in Egypt. The water supply in Egypt comes mainly from three sources: the Nile (95%), rainfall (3.5%), and groundwater (1.5%). The Nile gives 55.5 billion m3 per year, while the other two sources combined provide around 2.2 billion m3 of fresh water. Egypt’s freshwater reserves are around 58 billion m3 per year, however, the country’s annual water requirement is approximately 77 billion m3. The process of recycling is a way of reducing the gap between supply and demand of water in Egypt. The water shortfall, which is about 19 billion m3, is met by a mixture of recycled wastewater from agriculture (8 billion m3) and treated industrial effluent and sewage (4 billion m3). In addition, a supplementary 4 billion m3 of shallow aquifers are extracted, and 3 billion m3 are received from the Al-Salam Canal project [6], (Figure 1).
Similarly, the other countries in the MENA region such as Morocco, Algeria, Tunisia, Libya, Mauritania, Sudan, Lebanon, Jordan, Iraq, Syria, Saudi Arabia, Kuwait, Bahrain, Qatar, the United Arab Emirates, Oman and Yemen suffer from water shortages [7]. Increasing water shortage in these countries requires finding non-conventional water resources such as saltwater, agriculture drainage and wastewater to meet the growing demands for water [8,9,10]. Solar desalination is a novel approach to produce water with a low salt concentration using solar energy [11]. This paper presents the importance of using solar energy for saltwater desalination to produce economic crops, especially in greenhouse systems, and the possibility of applying that in the MENA region.

2. Expectations of Water Shortage in the Future

It is projected that water availability in the MENA region will decrease due to climate change [2,12,13]. Total renewable water resources will be significantly reduced due to the fluctuations in precipitation and evapotranspiration [14]. When considering the data for the whole MENA region, the total renewable water resources will decrease by about 12% (equal to 47 km3) a year, as illustrated in Figure 2 [15].
Furthermore, it is expected by 2050 that irrigation water requirements will increase by about 15% over present requirements, if global warming will cause wet weather [2,16,17] (Table 1). Conversely, if the climate becomes drier, irrigation requirements are expected to increase by about 33%. Overall, water requirements are estimated to increase by approximately 24% over the current requirements [16,17].

3. Using Solar Energy in Water Desalination to Irrigate Crops

Using water desalination by means of solar energy in agricultural production is crucial as a simple and low-cost technique to cope with water shortages particularly, under current climate change [2,18,19]. Using solar energy in seawater desalination requires solar-energy humidification–dehumidification desalination, thermal diffusion-driven desalination, solar stills, solar membrane distillation, hybrid desalination plant systems that integrate thermal and membrane desalination processes, intense solar energy-based desalination, solar pond distillation and nanomaterials for solar distillation technology [20].
Roca et al. [21] elucidated that water shortages in the Mediterranean region severely affect food production. Accordingly, using thermal desalination processes is needed to avoid the exploitation of aquifers to supply water to the crops. They used a greenhouse at the experimental station of the Cajamar Foundation in Almería, Spain. The cultivation of crops was carried out in two multiple tunnel greenhouses. Crop growth and crop management conditions were adjusted to be analogous to commercial greenhouses. A meteorological station was installed outside the greenhouse in order to record rainfall, relative humidity, temperature, light radiation, wind direction and velocity. Also, the climate variables inside the greenhouse such as air temperature, soil temperature, leaf temperature, photosynthetic active radiation (PAR), solar radiation, relative humidity, CO2 levels, and leaf wetness were measured, as well as the electrical conductivity and the pH in both irrigation and drainage water. They attempted to reduce the cost of producing fresh water from the solar desalination technique by using a hierarchical controller; using an appropriate control system with solar desalination reduces the electricity costs. Moreover, an external source of energy could be involved to confirm continuous freshwater production. Davies and Paton [22] modelled a greenhouse with humidification–dehumidification that combined a solar desalination scheme by utilising a computational fluid dynamics model, and calibrated the model with data from a preliminary greenhouse model in the United Arab Emirates. Their results indicated that this technique increased freshwater production, and simultaneously decreased the air temperature in the greenhouse.
Salem [23] indicated that solar-powered desalination is extremely appropriate under sunny environments such as those in the MENA region. Both efficiency and economy should be taken into consideration before using solar-powered water desalination. A novel scheme of humidification–dehumidification for desalination reduces the temperature inside greenhouses. Accordingly, this system produces fresh water from seawater as well as supplying a perfect environment for cultivating temperate crops. This approach produces required fresh water for crop production in a greenhouse system. It acts as a thermal still while giving a suitable environment for growth and crop production.
Furthermore, nanoparticles such as metal oxides could be used to increase the energy efficiency of the solar stills, which is a novel approach in this respect. These particles increase the absorption surface area to solar radiation ratio. In this context Sain and Kumawat [24] utilised nanoparticles of aluminum oxide (Al2O3) combined with black paint to enhance the efficiency of the solar still. They demonstrated that mixing nanoparticles with black paint increased the temperature of the solar stills. Accordingly, this led to a 38.1% increment in productivity of the solar still and a 12.2% increase of thermal efficiency compared to black paint without nanoparticles.

4. Feasibility of Saltwater Desalination in Greenhouse Systems

In the deserts, plants are exposed to harsh conditions due to environmental stress, low soil fertility, low precipitation and shortage of fresh water for irrigation. The deserts adjacent to sea water could be exploited by performing saltwater desalination in the greenhouse systems. Simple transparent solar stills could be used in new solar-powered agriculture greenhouses for water desalination [25]. The stills are fixed on the greenhouse roof surface. A certain amount of solar radiation is intercepted by the plants for the photosynthesis process and the main part is collected by the solar still units for desalination [25]. Under tropical and temperate conditions, a humidification–dehumidification (HDH) water desalination system can produce 11.6 and 20.4 m3/year-ha fresh water, with power consumption of 1.6 and 1.9 kWh/m3, respectively [22]. The HDH system was prepared to provide a cool and bright environment in desert climates in the vicinity of saline water, with several benefits compared to traditional greenhouses [11,26]. There are many types of greenhouses, including lean-to, even-span, uneven-span, Quonset/hoop-house, Gothic arch, elliptical, spherical dome, conventional and smart [27]. It is interesting to note that the spherical dome-type greenhouse represents the best geometrical shape that allows for a greater penetration of solar radiation to the crop plants (Figure 3a). A smart greenhouse system gives complete control of environmental conditions and agricultural processes through remote control (Figure 3b). It is extremely important to control the temperature in a greenhouse environment [28]. Remote monitoring and control systems protect the plants from precarious temperatures. This is performed through sensors to measure environmental variables (humidity, soil temperature, and air temperature, both outdoors and indoors) and actuators (such as shade screens and LED lights) are connected to automation software. Integrated climate systems, which include irrigation and dosing systems are also connected to automation software [29].
In this context, Kim et al. [30] investigated the impacts of irrigation with desalinated water on the growth of lettuce (Lactuca sativa L.) in South Korea, compared with saline under controlled greenhouse conditions. Their results showed that using saline irrigation water increased the salinity level in the soil and, consequently, adversely affected lettuce growth and yield, while desalinated water did not have these negative effects. Similarly, Martínez-Alvarez et al. [31] reported that irrigation using seawater desalination has been greatly applied in southeastern Spain in the last decade due to rising pressure and competition for water resources.
Irrigation and fertilisation are essential for agricultural production [2,32]. Kafkafi and Tarchitzky [33] demonstrated that fertigation has numerous benefits compared to applying fertilisers and water separately. These benefits comprise reducing the loss of irrigation water due to leaching, maintaining an optimal balance of nutrients by directly applying nutrients to the root zone, controlling the concentration of mineral elements in the soil solution, reducing energy costs, timing the fertilisation based on the plants’ requirements, and mixing the fertilisers with other micronutrients [34]. Therefore, fertigation is a flexible technology that can be simply combined with the greenhouse system. In this context, Martínez-Alvarez et al. [31] recommended using fertigation with desalinated seawater because the fertilizer and irrigation costs are reduced.

5. Possibility of Water Desalination for Agricultural Production in the MENA Region

Recently, desalination technologies have been developed and utilised with improved technology and lower costs. Moreover, their application has been extended to the agriculture sector worldwide [36,37]. The determination of desalinated water costs must consider three factors: (i) energy requirements, (ii) feed water quality, and (iii) water quality of the product. Kabeel and El-Said [26] reported that most countries have high solar energy potential for rural water supply and irrigation. HDH systems were developed, with technical and economic considerations, for agricultural use and drinking water requirements in arid regions. These systems contain a humidifier and a dehumidifier, energy sources for heating and electrical energy generation as well as accessories for the fluid transfer and control devices [38,39,40]. The main crop requirements inside greenhouses in an HDH system are given in Table 2 [41,42]. Presently there are about 200,000 ha of classical greenhouses in Mediterranean countries, used to produce fresh water from saltwater, and used to provide water for irrigation, which reduces groundwater depletion [26].
The countries of the MENA region suffer from some of the greatest water shortages in the world. Simultaneously, this region is considered the largest importer of agricultural products. Consequently, solar desalination could be used to provide fresh water for agricultural production in that area.
Recently, Egypt started a major national project in 2019 to establish 100,000 greenhouses, including 5000 greenhouses over an area of 8500 ha in the areas of El-Hammam, Abu Sultan, the Tenth of Ramadan and Al-Amal village east of Ismailia. The use of high-tech greenhouses for some crops has led to a 90% saving in irrigation water with a six-fold increase in productivity compared with open agriculture, as well as increasing the supply of different vegetable varieties in the market for citizens, at economic prices throughout the year [43].
It is worth mentioning here that Saudi Arabia is one of the most specialized countries in desalination in the Arab world, with 18% of its global freshwater production coming from desalination. In this country, more than 1.6 billion m3 of water are annually produced by desalination, followed by the United Arab Emirates and the United States of America, with each desalinating up to 13% of water for fresh water. Worldwide, there are more than 15,000 water plants dedicated to seawater desalination, producing 60 million m3 of water per day. Furthermore, Qatar uses about 1.2 million m3/day from desalinated water. However, agricultural production could be increased if the farmers apply the most efficient systems such as drip or sprinkler irrigation and hydroponics [44].
During the summer season, Tunisians face problems with their drinking water supply. Therefore, 200 desalination plants were established in 2018 on the island of Djerba (one of the most popular tourist destinations in Tunisia), where the treated water is directed mainly to the cities of Djerba on the island and Zarzis on the nearby mainland. The desalination plant produces 50,000 m3 of drinking water per day, which can be expanded to 75,000 m3 per day. The operation of the desalination plant contributes greatly to the economic, social and environmental progress of the island. It is the largest seawater desalination plant, in terms of total area, of the entire Maghreb region [43].
Hirich et al. [45] showed that a greenhouse-cropping system is used frequently in the region of Souss-Massa in Morocco; it covers an area of more than 15,000 ha. Nevertheless, the region has a great problem of water scarcity as the annual precipitation does not surpass 200 mm, and the water shortage is more than 260 million cubic metres. Moreover, agricultural production in this region uses about 90% of the available water. Furthermore, the increased costs of over-pumping due to the low-level of groundwater, especially in coastal areas, exacerbates environmental problems. The use of desalinated seawater to irrigate crops such as tomatoes, berries, and various vegetables can be an economic alternative to ensure the continued production of horticultural products. Table 3 shows the production of certain crops in the Souss-Massa region of Morocco in 2010 and 2013, as well as the expected yields for 2020 [45]. The highest production comes from vegetables, followed by citrus fruit. This region produces about 77% of Morocco’s vegetables, 40% of the production of citrus fruit, and only 2% of the production of olives. Moreover, the expected increase in agricultural production by 2020 will necessitate more water requirements. Consequently, progress in desalination technologies is needed to provide the required amount of water in these regions, at economical costs.
Vegetable crops such as those in the solanaceous family (i.e., tomato, potato, eggplant and pepper) and the cucurbits family (i.e., watermelon, melon, cucumber and summer squash) are suitable for greenhouse conditions. Success of these crops under controlled cultivation is due to their good adaptation and growth across several cultivation cycles, as well as their economic convenience. These crops represent about 80% of the controlled cultivation in most countries in the MENA region [46]. Furthermore, these crops are produced in large quantities in the MENA region, as illustrated in Table 4, [47]. Subsequently, it is efficacious to use desalinated water for producing these crops under greenhouse conditions.

6. Economics of the Desalination Process

The process of assessing the cost of water depends on many factors, including: benefits of the produced water in the long run, the greenhouse cost, the type of water desalination process, the plant production capacity, the water quality, the options available for waste disposal, the annual market value of production, the costs of labour, maintenance marketing, transportation and the cost of employees during the life of the plant [45,48,49].
Chaibi and Bourouni [50] evaluated the impact of the water cost on crop productivity. They disclosed that the water desalination process could be economically advantageous for farmers to produce great commercial value if they followed the technical recommendations for a high crop yield production.
Hirich et al. [45] showed that the process of water desalination would support agricultural development in the Souss-Massa region with respect to production and export of agricultural products such as vegetables and fruit. They reported that although the pumping cost in the Souss-Massa region (cost US$0.3/m3) is cheaper than the desalination process (US$0.5/m3), most farmers are motivated to use desalinated water for irrigation. This indicated that the farmers are aware of the scale and implications of the water shortage problem in the region.
The current shortage of water resources in Egypt is about 20 billion m3, and the economic cost of desalinated water is still high [51]. The production of the existing desalination plants contributes to about one billion m3 of water, at a cost of 20 Egyptian pounds per m3 of desalinated water. Therefore, it is not economically efficient to irrigate extensive crops such as wheat, corn or rice using desalinated water. Table 5 shows the installation and water production costs for some types of desalination plant [16]. These details reveal that using desalinated water is not economical for growing field crops, but is economical for producing high price vegetable and fruits crops.

7. Environmental Impacts of the Desalination Process

Throughout the establishment of seawater desalination plants and the installation of desalination equipment and technologies, water pollution caused by turbidity might lead to the death of marine organisms. In addition, water withdrawals and drainage could lead to some modifications to the seabed as a result of the withdrawal of marine organisms with water, which may also cause blockages in the pipes. Desalination may also have an impact on fisheries and coral reefs, and lead to the spread of chemicals. Additionally, the residuals (high temperature and high-salinity water) of the desalination processes could lead to the death of marine organisms, particularly coral reefs and the residuals could reflect negatively on the seabed as they lead to pollution when they enter the sea [52,53].
Additionally, the desalination process results in atmospheric and marine pollution, caused by brine disposal. There are some difficulties associated with desalination technologies with regard to the success of wide implementation, especially because they need highly skilled and/or highly educated farmers or users and it might not be profitable unless farmers use the technologies for high-value products. It is not feasible for mass production or accessibility to local consumers. Moreover, the severely polluted source of saltwater might limit the availability of accessible saltwater for desalination [52,54]. These negative environmental impacts must be investigated and overcome to maintain a sustainable use of desalination technology.

8. Quality of Desalinated Water Compared with Other Non-Conventional Resources

In light of water scarcity, many countries in the MENA region use non-conventional water resources such as desalinated saltwater, reused agriculture drainage and wastewater [28,55,56]. Desalinated saltwater is a potential non-conventional water resource that provides water with high quality [30,31]. Additionally, desalination is completely climate-independent and produces acceptable amounts of good-quality water for use in different sectors. Accordingly, desalination is expected to increase around the world over the next years [7,10,57]. In this context, almost all countries are showing much interest in minimising the pollution of fresh water to reduce the cost of treatment and prevent an adverse impact on public health [58].
On the other hand, the rapid progress of human activities, especially industrial and agricultural activities, and the release of large quantities of nutrients and other pollutants into coastal seawater, have led to high eutrophication in some parts of the countries of the Mediterranean Coast [59,60]. Certain studies reported several heavy metals in the water, and sediment and/or animals in the coastal sea areas [61]; other studies were concerned with the total amount of pesticides and petroleum hydrocarbons [62] and chemical oxygen demand (COD) [63,64]. Therefore, water quality and reduction of pollution sources at different levels is essential to reduce negative effects on crop production. Moreover, it is not only crop production that is affected by water pollution, but also soil quality, aquaculture, lake biodiversity, and, most importantly, human health. Furthermore, it has been documented that drainage water contains high quantities of untreated wastewater, municipal waste and fertilisers that are a hazard to the quality of potable and irrigation water [65,66,67]. Additionally, salinity of drainage water is considered a major concern for water quality used in agriculture, particularly in arid regions. Reutilising drainage water with high levels of salinity adversely affects irrigation sustainability and crop production [68]. El-Bouraie et al. [69] analyzed the quality of river water in the Rosetta branch at the outlet of the El-Rahawy drain of the Nile Delta. Seasonally, they collected water samples from El-Rahawy and the Rosetta branch and determined their physicochemical parameters. The results indicated that the water presented a high concentration of ammonia, total dissolved solids (TDS) with low COD, dissolved oxygen (DO) and biochemical oxygen demand (BOD) values along the El-Rahawy drain; these negative impacts were deteriorating the water quality downstream of the Rosetta branch, particularly through periods of low flow in the winter. In this respect, El-Agha et al. [68] studied the drainage system of the approximately 82,740 ha Meet Yazid area located in the upper part of the Nile Delta. They reported that the quality and salinity of drainage water have great variability, both in time and space, in the Nile Delta. The secondary drains showed uppermost variability of salinity compared to the subsurface drainage and the main drain collectors. In the secondary drains, the salinity increased about 4 times more than that of the drainage water coming from the collectors. Furthermore, Dorgham et al. [70] indicated that the discharged wastewater caused pronounced quality changes in the coastal waters of the Nile Delta. The nutrient salts showed excessive variation through the studied area and over the studied time scale. Nitrate showed a range from 3 to 1682 µg/L, nitrite’s concentration ranged from 0.42 to 1106.2 µg/L, ammonia displayed a high concentration (1646.6 µg/L), the total phosphorus fell within the range from 10 to 8260 µg/L and silicate ranged from 40 to 40800 µg/L. High phytoplankton biomass was registered over the whole area (Chlorophyll-a from 0.4 to 197.4 µg/L). The results of this study revealed a great degradation and unhealthy consequences on public health.
Treated wastewater is another non-conventional water resource to cope with water shortages [71]. Wastewater has poor quality, therefore, it should be treated efficiently to diminish adverse health risk. In this context El-Bana et al. [67] assessed wastewater quality during 2015 in the winter crop season in the Bahr El-Baqar Drain in Sharqia, Egypt. This drain is one of the main ones in the Nile Delta that receive diverse types of wastewater. The chemical and microbial analyses revealed oxygen depletion for all collected samples. Furthermore, the microbial analysis showed contamination by fecal coliform (>1000 per 100 mL) in winter and summer samples. Moreover, concentrations of NO3, MoO4 and NH4 levels were more than the recommended standards for reusing the water of Bahr El-Baqar in irrigation. According to the results of soil analysis, cadmium contamination was detected, with levels higher than the standard values [67]. Likewise, El-Rawy et al. [72] studied the quality of water in the Ismailia Canal, in the Nile Delta in Egypt. The investigated drains were extremely polluted from the discharge of industrial waste and wastewater treatment. El-Osta et al. [73] investigated the geochemical evolution of groundwater quality for the Nubian Sandstone Aquifer. The water quality index (WQI) showed that most of the sample points (approximately 89%) were inappropriate for drinking due to hazardous iron levels.
In Morocco, due to the noticeable water shortage, using treated wastewater in irrigation is required for the preservation of water resources. Consequently, the feasibility of the reuse procedure was studied [74]. In addition, farmers were forced to adopt the use of raw wastewater in areas where it is available close to their agricultural lands due to the increasing demand for food. According to Choukr-Allah [75], around 700 million m3 of raw wastewater is released, and about 60% of this amount is discharged into the sea; the remaining quantity is divided between draining-off of surface waters that represent the major part, and a reuse operation concerning more than 7000 ha. However, the continuation of these discharges may lead to a deep degradation in the water resources and dangerous consequences for the drinking water supply for many regions of the country. Similarly, continuing to reuse raw wastewater may have serious negative effects on public health [74].
The government of Algeria is well aware of the need for additional water resources since the country is characterised by an arid and semi-arid climate. Significant investment has been provided for the construction of treatment plants for wastewater reuse. With additional treatment, the wastewater can be used for several purposes, and in particular, for agriculture. However, beyond the clear advantages of reuse, there are many constraints, in terms of legislation and above all of the water quality itself. While it is obvious that the reuse of wastewater has a great future in Algeria, it is also imperative to create the necessary conditions for its development. The treated water could be reutilised for irrigation of some salt-tolerant crops. The sewage sludge, with a relatively low quantity of organic matter, could be used as a fertiliser [76].
Tunisia is facing increasingly serious water shortage problems. For that reason, Tunisia reused about 24% of the total collected wastewater. Half of this amount is used directly for irrigation in agriculture, parks, and on golf courses and the rest flows indirectly into the water reserves [77]. Several authors, such as Bahri [78], have reported on the status of the reuse of wastewater in Tunisia. According to forecasts, increased domestic and industrial water consumption by the year 2020 may cause a reduction in the volume of fresh water available for Tunisian agriculture. Bahri [78] claimed that the annual required water is expected to reach 290 mm3 in the year 2020. Consequently, the government will increase the amount of reused wastewater.

9. Conclusions and Recommendations

Water shortage is projected to increase in the MENA region due to climate change, particularly in arid regions. Accordingly, it is crucial to find non-conventional water resources such as desalinated saltwater, agriculture drainage and wastewater. Desalinated seawater is a potential non-conventional water resource that provides very reliable amounts of good-quality water for use in different sectors. Otherwise, agriculture drainage and wastewater contain heavy metals, pesticides and petroleum hydrocarbons. Accordingly, these two types of water have dangerous consequences and serious negative effects on public health. Subsequently, it is essential to be treated efficiently for diminishing its adverse health risk. Furthermore, the treated wastewater can be used for landscaping and agriculture instead of valuable non-renewable groundwater. Using water desalination by means of solar energy in agricultural production to address water shortages is crucial as a simple and low-cost technique. Solar desalination could be economically advantageous for farmers to produce great commercial value if they followed the technical recommendations to produce a high crop yield. However, the desalination process has certain negative impacts on the environment that must be investigated and overcome.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization: H.A.A., H.E.S.F., A.A.J., A.N.; data curation: H.A.A., E.M., A.N.; writing—original draft preparation, H.A.A., E.M., A.N.; Writing—review and editing, H.A.A., E.M., M.A., H.E.S.F., A.A.J., A.N.; supervision, H.A.A., A.N.; Project administration, A.N., H.E.S.F., A.A.J.; Funding acquisition, A.N., H.E.S.F., A.A.J. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This paper is based on work that was supported by Science, Technology, and Innovation Funding Authority (STIFA) of Egypt, Grant No. (30771) and the British Council (BC) of UK, Grant No. (332435306), through the project titled “A Novel Standalone Solar-Driven Agriculture Greenhouse-Desalination System: That Grows its Energy and Irrigation Water” via the Newton-Mosharafa funding scheme.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Negewo, B.D. Renewable Energy Desalination: An. Emerging Solution to Close the Water Gap in the Middle East and North Africa; World Bank Publications: Washington, DC, USA, 2012; pp. 1–145. [Google Scholar]
  2. Mansour, E.; Abdul-Hamid, M.I.; Yasin, M.T.; Qabil, N.; Attia, A. Identifying drought-tolerant genotypes of barley and their responses to various irrigation levels in a Mediterranean environment. Agric. Water Manag. 2017, 194, 58–67. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Mansour, E.; Moustafa, E.S.; Qabil, N.; Abdelsalam, A.; Wafa, H.A.; El Kenawy, A.; Casas, A.M.; Igartua, E. Assessing different barley growth habits under Egyptian conditions for enhancing resilience to climate change. Field Crop. Res. 2018, 224, 67–75. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Mansour, E.; Moustafa, E.S.; El-Naggar, N.Z.; Abdelsalam, A.; Igartua, E. Grain yield stability of high-yielding barley genotypes under Egyptian conditions for enhancing resilience to climate change. Crop. Pasture Sci. 2018, 69, 681–690. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Elsaeed, G. Effects of Climate Change on Egypt’s Water Supply. In National Security and Human Health Implications of Climate Change; Fernando, H.J.S., Klaić, Z., McCulley, J.L., Eds.; Springer: New York, NY, USA, 2012; pp. 337–347. [Google Scholar]
  6. Mohie El Din, M.O.; Moussa, A.M. Water management in Egypt for facing the future challenges. J. Adv. Res. 2016, 7, 403–412. [Google Scholar]
  7. Mashaly, A.F.; Alazba, A.; Al-Awaadh, A.; Mattar, M.A. Area determination of solar desalination system for irrigating crops in greenhouses using different quality feed water. Agric. Water Manag. 2015, 154, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Jeuland, M. Challenges to wastewater reuse in the Middle East and North Africa. Middle East Dev. J. 2015, 7, 1–25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Hussain, M.I.; Muscolo, A.; Farooq, M.; Ahmad, W. Sustainable use and management of non-conventional water resources for rehabilitation of marginal lands in arid and semiarid environments. Agric. Water Manag. 2019, 221, 462–476. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Qadir, M.; Sharma, B.R.; Bruggeman, A.; Choukr-Allah, R.; Karajeh, F. Non-conventional water resources and opportunities for water augmentation to achieve food security in water scarce countries. Agric. Water Manag. 2007, 87, 2–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Akrami, M.; Salah, A.H.; Dibaj, M.; Porcheron, M.; Javadi, A.A.; Farmani, R.; Fath, H.E.; Negm, A. A Zero-liquid discharge model for a transient solar-powered desalination system for greenhouse. Water 2020, 12, 1440. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Ozturk, T.; Ceber, Z.P.; Türkeş, M.; Kurnaz, M.L. Projections of climate change in the Mediterranean Basin by using downscaled global climate model outputs. Int. J. Climatol. 2015, 35, 4276–4292. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Spinoni, J.; Vogt, J.V.; Naumann, G.; Barbosa, P.; Dosio, A. Will drought events become more frequent and severe in Europe? Int. J. Climatol. 2018, 38, 1718–1736. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  14. Rajsekhar, D.; Singh, V.P.; Mishra, A.K. Integrated drought causality, hazard, and vulnerability assessment for future socioeconomic scenarios: An information theory perspective. J. Geophys. Res. Atmos. 2015, 120, 6346–6378. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Negewo, B.D.; Immerzeel, W.; Droogers, P.; Terink, W.; Hoogeveen, J.; Hellegers, P.; van Beek, R. Middle-East and Northern Africa Water Outlook. FutureWater Rep. 2011, 98, 350. [Google Scholar]
  16. Beltrán, J.M.; Koo-Oshima, S. Water desalination for agricultural applications. In Proceedings of the FAO Expert Consultation on Water Desalination for Agricultural Applications, Rome, Italy, 26–27 April 2004; Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations: Rome, Italy, 2006; pp. 1–48. [Google Scholar]
  17. Bouras, E.; Jarlan, L.; Khabba, S.; Er-Raki, S.; Dezetter, A.; Sghir, F.; Tramblay, Y. Assessing the impact of global climate changes on irrigated wheat yields and water requirements in a semi-arid environment of Morocco. Sci. Rep. 2019, 9, 19142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Chaibi, M. An overview of solar desalination for domestic and agriculture water needs in remote arid areas. Desalination 2000, 127, 119–133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Li, C.; Goswami, Y.; Stefanakos, E. Solar assisted sea water desalination: A review. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2013, 19, 136–163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Alnaimat, F.; Klausner, J.; Mathew, B. Solar desalination. In Desalination and Water Treatment; Eyvaz, M., Ed.; IntechOpen: London, UK, 2018; pp. 127–150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  21. Roca, L.; Sánchez, J.A.; Rodríguez, F.; Bonilla, J.; De la Calle, A.; Berenguel, M. Predictive control applied to a solar desalination plant connected to a greenhouse with daily variation of irrigation water demand. Energies 2016, 9, 194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  22. Davies, P.; Paton, C. The seawater greenhouse in the United Arab Emirates: Thermal modelling and evaluation of design options. Desalination 2005, 173, 103–111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Salem, M.G. Solar Desalination as an Adaptation Tool for Climate Change Impacts on the Water Resources of Egypt; United Nations Education, Scientific and Cultural Organization: New York, NY, USA, 2013; pp. 1–94. [Google Scholar]
  24. Sain, M.K.; Kumawat, G. Performance enhancement of single slope solar still using nano-particles mixed black paint. Int. J. Adv. Sci. Technol. 2015, 1, 55–65. [Google Scholar]
  25. Salah, A.H.; Hassan, G.E.; Elhelw, M.; Fath, H.; Elsherbiny, S.E. Performance improvement of roof transparent solar still coupled with agriculture greenhouse. Renew. Energy Sustain. Dev. 2017, 3, 74–78. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  26. Kabeel, A.; El-Said, E.M. Water production for irrigation and drinking needs in remote arid communities using closed-system greenhouse: A review. Eng. Sci. Technol. 2015, 18, 294–301. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  27. Types of Greenhouses. Available online: https://www.growingreenhouse.com/greenhouse-structure/ (accessed on 10 June 2020).
  28. Akrami, M.; Salah, A.H.; Javadi, A.A.; Fath, H.E.; Hassanein, M.J.; Farmani, R.; Dibaj, M.; Negm, A. Towards a sustainable greenhouse: Review of trends and emerging practices in analysing greenhouse ventilation requirements to sustain maximum agricultural yield. Sustainability 2020, 12, 2794. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  29. Smart Greenhouse. Available online: https://www.postscapes.com/smart-greenhouses/ (accessed on 10 June 2020).
  30. Kim, H.; Kim, S.; Jeon, J.; Jeong, H. Effects of Irrigation with Desalinated Water on Lettuce Grown under Greenhouse in South Korea. Appl. Sci. 2020, 10, 2207. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  31. Martínez-Alvarez, V.; Gallego-Elvira, B.; Maestre-Valero, J.; Martin-Gorriz, B.; Soto-Garcia, M. Assessing concerns about fertigation costs with desalinated seawater in south-eastern Spain. Agric. Water Manag. 2020, 239, 106257. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Mansour, E.; Merwad, A.; Yasin, M.; Abdul-Hamid, M.; El-Sobky, E.; Oraby, H. Nitrogen use efficiency in spring wheat: Genotypic variation and grain yield response under sandy soil conditions. J. Agric. Sci. 2017, 155, 1407–1423. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Kafkafi, U.; Tarchitzky, J. A Tool for Efficient Fertilizer and Water Management; International Potash Institute (IPI): Paris, France, 2011; pp. 1–123. [Google Scholar]
  34. Nasr, P.; Sewilam, H. Fertilizer Drawn Forward Ssmosis for Irrigation. In Emerging Technologies for Sustainable Desalination Handbook; Gude, V.G., Ed.; Elsevier: Cambridge, UK, 2018; pp. 433–460. [Google Scholar]
  35. How to Build Smart Greenhouse. Available online: https://r-stylelab.com/company/blog/iot/iot-agriculture-how-to-build-smart-greenhouse (accessed on 5 August 2020).
  36. Burn, S.; Hoang, M.; Zarzo, D.; Olewniak, F.; Campos, E.; Bolto, B.; Barron, O. Desalination techniques—A review of the opportunities for desalination in agriculture. Desalination 2015, 364, 2–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Akrami, M.; Javadi, A.A.; Hassanein, M.J.; Farmani, R.; Dibaj, M.; Tabor, G.R.; Negm, A. Study of the effects of vent configuration on mono-span greenhouse ventilation using computational fluid dynamics. Sustainability 2020, 12, 986. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  38. Han, D.; He, W.; Yue, C.; Pu, W. Study on desalination of zero-emission system based on mechanical vapor compression. Appl. Energy 2017, 185, 1490–1496. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Abdelmoez, W.; Mahmoud, M.S.; Farrag, T.E. Water desalination using humidification/dehumidification (HDH) technique powered by solar energy: A detailed review. Desalin. Water Treat. 2014, 52, 4622–4640. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Rahimi-Ahar, Z.; Hatamipour, M.S.; Ahar, L.R. Air Humidification-Dehumidification Process for Desalination: A review. Prog. Energy Combust. Sci. 2020, 80, 100850. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Radhwan, A.M.; Fath, H.E. Thermal performance of greenhouses with a built-in solar distillation system: Experimental study. Desalination 2005, 181, 193–205. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Kabeel, A.; Almagar, A.M. Seawater greenhouse in desalination and economics. In Proceedings of the Seventeenth International Water Technology Conference (IWTC17), Istanbul, Turkey, 5–7 November 2013. [Google Scholar]
  43. Islam, S.F.-U.; Sander, B.O.; Quilty, J.R.; de Neergaard, A.; van Groenigen, J.W.; Jensen, L.S. Mitigation of greenhouse gas emissions and reduced irrigation water use in rice production through water-saving irrigation scheduling, reduced tillage and fertiliser application strategies. Sci. Total Environ. 2020, 739, 140215. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Sewilam, H.; Nasr, P. Desalinated Water for Food Production in the Arab Region. In The Water, Energy, and Food Security Nexus in the Arab Region; Amer, K., Adeel, Z., Böer, B., Saleh, W., Eds.; Springer: Gewerbestrasse, Cham, Switzerland, 2017; pp. 59–81. [Google Scholar]
  45. Hirich, A.; Choukr-Allah, R.; Rami, A.; El-Otmani, M. Feasibility of Using Desalination for Irrigation in the Souss Massa Region in the South of Morocco. In Recent Progress in Desalination, Environmental and Marine Outfall Systems; Baawain, M., Choudri, B., Ahmed, M., Purnama, A., Eds.; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2015; pp. 189–203. [Google Scholar]
  46. Tüzel, Y.; Leonardi, C. Protected cultivation in Mediterranean region: Trends and needs. Ege Üniv. Ziraat Fak. Derg. 2009, 46, 215–223. [Google Scholar]
  47. FAO Corporate Statistical Database, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. 2020. Available online: http://www.fao.org/faostat/en/#data/QC (accessed on 5 July 2020).
  48. Kasper, S.; Lior, N. A methodology for comparing water desalination to competitive fresh water transportation and treatment. Desalination 1979, 30, 541–552. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Chaibi, M.; Safi, M.; Hsairi, M. Performance analysis of a solar desalting unit in south Tunisia. Desalination 1991, 82, 187–196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Chaibi, M.T.; Bourouni, K. Development of Solar Desalination Systems Concepts for Irrigation in Arid Areas Conditions. In Solar Desalination for the 21st Century; Rizzuti, L., Ettouney, H.M., Cipollina, A., Eds.; Springer: Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 2007; pp. 19–32. [Google Scholar]
  51. Hafez, A.; El-Manharawy, S. Economics of seawater RO desalination in the Red Sea region, Egypt. Part 1. A case study. Desalination 2003, 153, 335–347. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Miller, S.; Shemer, H.; Semiat, R. Energy and environmental issues in desalination. Desalination 2015, 366, 2–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Lattemann, S.; Höpner, T. Environmental impact and impact assessment of seawater desalination. Desalination 2008, 220, 1–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Einav, R.; Harussi, K.; Perry, D. The footprint of the desalination processes on the environment. Desalination 2003, 152, 141–154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Barnes, J. Mixing waters: The reuse of agricultural drainage water in Egypt. Geoforum 2014, 57, 181–191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Ghaffour, N.; Missimer, T.M.; Amy, G.L. Combined desalination, water reuse, and aquifer storage and recovery to meet water supply demands in the GCC/MENA region. Desalin. Water Treat. 2013, 51, 38–43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Al-Khatib, I.A.; Arafat, H.A. Chemical and microbiological quality of desalinated water, groundwater and rain-fed cisterns in the Gaza strip, Palestine. Desalination 2009, 249, 1165–1170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Sharma, S.; Bhattacharya, A. Drinking water contamination and treatment techniques. Appl. Water Sci. 2017, 7, 1043–1067. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  59. Karydis, M.; Kitsiou, D. Eutrophication and environmental policy in the Mediterranean Sea: A review. Environ. Monit. Assess. 2012, 184, 4931–4984. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  60. Mesnage, V.; Picot, B. The distribution of phosphate in sediments and its relation with eutrophication of a Mediterranean coastal lagoon. Hydrobiologia 1995, 297, 29–41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Soliman, N.F.; Nasr, S.M.; Okbah, M.A. Potential ecological risk of heavy metals in sediments from the Mediterranean coast, Egypt. J. Environ. Health Sci. Eng. 2015, 13, 70. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  62. Said, T.O.; Hamed, M. Determination of persistent organic pollutants in water of new Damietta Harbour, Egypt. Egypt. J. Aquat. Res. 2006, 32, 235–245. [Google Scholar]
  63. El-Gammal, M.; Ibrahim, M.; Gad, A.; El-Zeiny, A. Integration of lab analyses and GIS techniques for assessment of some physical and chemical characteristics in different water bodies, Damietta coastal region, Egypt. Mansoura J. Environ. Sci. 2015, 44, 257–284. [Google Scholar]
  64. El-Zeiny, A. Monitoring and Evaluation of Some Pollutants at New Damietta–Damietta-Egypt. Ph.D. Thesis, Faculty of Science, Mansoura University, Mansoura, Egypt, 2010. [Google Scholar]
  65. Abdel-Azim, R.; Allam, M. Agricultural drainage water reuse in Egypt: Strategic issues and mitigation measures. In Non-Conventional Water Use: WASAMED Project; Hamdy, A., El Gamal, F., Lamaddalena, N., Bogliotti, C., Guelloubi, R., Eds.; CIHEAM/EU DG Research: Bari, Italy, 2005; pp. 105–117. [Google Scholar]
  66. Wolters, W.; Smit, R.; Nour El-Din, M.; Sayed Ahmed, E.; Froebrich, J.; Ritzema, H. Issues and challenges in spatial and temporal water allocation in the Nile Delta. Sustainability 2016, 8, 383. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  67. Elbana, T.A.; Bakr, N.; George, B.; Elbana, M. Assessment of marginal quality water for sustainable irrigation management: Case study of Bahr El-Baqar area, Egypt. Water Air Soil Pollut. 2017, 228, 214. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. El-Agha, D.E.; Molle, F.; Rap, E.; El Bialy, M.; Abou El-Hassan, W. Drainage water salinity and quality across nested scales in the Nile Delta of Egypt. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2020, 27, 32239–32250. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. El Bouraie, M.M.; Motawea, E.A.; Mohamed, G.G.; Yehia, M.M. Water quality of Rosetta branch in Nile delta, Egypt. Finn. Peatl. Soc. 2011, 62, 31–37. [Google Scholar]
  70. Dorgham, M.M.; El-Tohamy, W.; Qin, J.; Abdel-Aziz, N.; Ghobashy, A. Water quality assessment of the Nile Delta Coast, south eastern Mediterranean, Egypt. Egypt. J. Aquat. Biol. Fish. 2019, 23, 151–169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  71. Pedrero, F.; Kalavrouziotis, I.; Alarcón, J.J.; Koukoulakis, P.; Asano, T. Use of treated municipal wastewater in irrigated agriculture—Review of some practices in Spain and Greece. Agric. Water Manag. 2010, 97, 1233–1241. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. El-Rawy, M.; Fathi, H.; Abdalla, F. Integration of remote sensing data and in situ measurements to monitor the water quality of the Ismailia Canal, Nile Delta, Egypt. Environ. Geochem. Health 2019, 42, 2101–2120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  73. El Osta, M.; Masoud, M.; Ezzeldin, H. Assessment of the geochemical evolution of groundwater quality near the El Kharga Oasis, Egypt using NETPATH and water quality indices. Environ. Earth Sci. 2020, 79, 56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Choukr-Allah, R.; Hamdy, A. Wastewater recycling and reuse in Mediterranean region as a potential resource for water saving. Options Méditerr. Sér. B Etudes Rech. 2003, 44, 89–101. [Google Scholar]
  75. Choukr-Allah, R. Perspectives of Wastewater Reuse in the Mediterranean Region. In Integrated Water Resources Management in the Mediterranean Region; Springer: Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 2012; pp. 125–137. [Google Scholar]
  76. Karef, S.; Kettab, A.; Nakib, M. Characterization of byproducts from wastewater treatment of Medea (Algeria) with a view to agricultural reuse. Desalin. Water Treat. 2014, 52, 2201–2207. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Tunisia: Demand for Wastewater Treatment Technology Is Rising. 2020. Available online: https://global-recycling.info/archives/1465 (accessed on 5 August 2020).
  78. Bahri, A. Water reuse in Tunisia: Stakes and prospects. In Proceedings of the Atelier du PCSI (Programme Commun Systèmes Irrigués) sur une Maîtrise des Impacts Environnementaux de l’Irrigation, Montpellier, France, 28–29 May 2002. [Google Scholar]
Sustainability 12 07592 g001 550
Figure 1. Annual water requirements in Egypt and the sources from where they are obtained.
Figure 1. Annual water requirements in Egypt and the sources from where they are obtained.
Sustainability 12 07592 g001
Sustainability 12 07592 g002 550
Figure 2. Total gross recharge, internal, external and total renewable water resources in the MENA region from 2010 to 2050 [15].
Figure 2. Total gross recharge, internal, external and total renewable water resources in the MENA region from 2010 to 2050 [15].
Sustainability 12 07592 g002
Sustainability 12 07592 g003 550
Figure 3. Certain types of greenhouses: (a) a spherical dome greenhouse and (b) a smart greenhouse [27,35].
Figure 3. Certain types of greenhouses: (a) a spherical dome greenhouse and (b) a smart greenhouse [27,35].
Sustainability 12 07592 g003
Table
Table 1. Projected irrigation water requirements in the MENA region (km3/year) and the percentage increment over the current requirements [16].
Table 1. Projected irrigation water requirements in the MENA region (km3/year) and the percentage increment over the current requirements [16].
Climate Scenario AverageDry Wet
Current 2000–09213--
2020–30237 (+11%)254 (+19%)222 (+4%)
2040–50265 (+24%)283 (+33%)246 (+15%)
Note: - = not available.
Table
Table 2. Requirements of certain crops in greenhouses in a humidification–dehumidification (HDH) system [26,41].
Table 2. Requirements of certain crops in greenhouses in a humidification–dehumidification (HDH) system [26,41].
CropTemperature (°C)Relative Humidity (%)Water (L m−2 day−1)
Cucumber2060–653
Tomato15–2560–653
Pepper20603
Flower15–2570–908
Lettuce20–25603
Table
Table 3. Production of some crops in the Souss-Massa region of Morocco [45].
Table 3. Production of some crops in the Souss-Massa region of Morocco [45].
Product2010 (ton)2013 (ton)2020 (ton)
Vegetables1480 (77%)17782140
Cereals385 (5%)283287
Citrus 646 (39%)8931070
Olive27 (2%)2843
Other fruits562 (18%)571677
Table
Table 4. Total production of some vegetable crops in the MENA countries during 2018 (in tonnes) [47].
Table 4. Total production of some vegetable crops in the MENA countries during 2018 (in tonnes) [47].
CountryCauliflower and BroccoliMelon and CantaloupePotatoTomatoWatermelonCucumber and Gherkin
Algeria207,697-4,653,3221,309,7452,095,757193,647
Bahrain461575684114194546
Egypt127,273701,0714,896,4766,624,7331,483,255457,795
Iraq11,285113,538294,778266,294222,595114,828
Jordan66,03440,673177,431839,052110,417209,362
Kuwait13,252281136,21297,99174958,590
Lebanon20,54913,091387,791300,15765,384151,558
Libya745726,351348,361215,584236,0129269
Mauritania--2260-2980-
Morocco59,056500,8231,869,1491,409,437742,37547,787
Oman28,03133,46315,613199,23256,04712,545
Qatar145524631725,1054261761
Saudi Arabia-39,360482,305312,343634,491115,617
Sudan77635,259442,988674,378172,867240,405
Syrian Arab Republic23,84154,000540,000669,000230,900104,397
Tunisia14,332102,546423,8001,357,621548,64976,425
United Arab Emirates6500368645178,607220571,350
Yemen-27,029248,889114,297146,50714,715
Table
Table 5. Installation and water production costs of several types of desalination plant [16].
Table 5. Installation and water production costs of several types of desalination plant [16].
Desalination PlantInstallation Costs (US $/m3)Water Production Cost (US $/m3)
Multistage flash distillation1200–15001.10–1.25
Multiple-effect distillation900–10000.75–0.85
Multistage flash distillation (Singapore)23001.50
Multiple-effect distillation (Metropolitan Water District, California, USA)6600.46
Vapour compression distillation950–10000.87–0.95

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Awaad, H.A.; Mansour, E.; Akrami, M.; Fath, H.E.S.; Javadi, A.A.; Negm, A. Availability and Feasibility of Water Desalination as a Non-Conventional Resource for Agricultural Irrigation in the MENA Region: A Review. Sustainability 2020, 12, 7592. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12187592

AMA Style

Awaad HA, Mansour E, Akrami M, Fath HES, Javadi AA, Negm A. Availability and Feasibility of Water Desalination as a Non-Conventional Resource for Agricultural Irrigation in the MENA Region: A Review. Sustainability. 2020; 12(18):7592. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12187592

Chicago/Turabian Style

Awaad, Hassan A., Elsayed Mansour, Mohammad Akrami, Hassan E.S. Fath, Akbar A. Javadi, and Abdelazim Negm. 2020. "Availability and Feasibility of Water Desalination as a Non-Conventional Resource for Agricultural Irrigation in the MENA Region: A Review" Sustainability 12, no. 18: 7592. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12187592

APA Style

Awaad, H. A., Mansour, E., Akrami, M., Fath, H. E. S., Javadi, A. A., & Negm, A. (2020). Availability and Feasibility of Water Desalination as a Non-Conventional Resource for Agricultural Irrigation in the MENA Region: A Review. Sustainability, 12(18), 7592. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12187592

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop