Next Article in Journal
Indoor Environmental Quality in Latin American Buildings: A Systematic Literature Review
Next Article in Special Issue
Supporting Electrification Policy in Fragile States: A Conflict-Adjusted Geospatial Least Cost Approach for Afghanistan
Previous Article in Journal
A Sustainable Approach to the Low-Cost Recycling of Waste Glass Fibres Composites towards Circular Economy
Previous Article in Special Issue
Long-Term Distributional Impacts of European Cap-and-Trade Climate Policies: A CGE Multi-Regional Analysis
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Sustainability
Volume 12
Issue 2
10.3390/su12020642
Review Report
sustainability-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles
Review
Peer-Review Record

Overview of the Available Knowledge for the Data Model Definition of a Building Renovation Passport for Non-Residential Buildings: The ALDREN Project Experience

Sustainability 2020, 12(2), 642; https://doi.org/10.3390/su12020642
by Marta Maria Sesana 1,*, Mathieu Rivallain 2 and Graziano Salvalai 3
Reviewer 1: Anonymous
Reviewer 2: Anonymous
Sustainability 2020, 12(2), 642; https://doi.org/10.3390/su12020642
Submission received: 12 November 2019 / Revised: 17 December 2019 / Accepted: 30 December 2019 / Published: 15 January 2020
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Sustainable Energy Economics and Policy)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

In this paper a study of an overview on available knowledge for the data model definition of a building renovation passport for non-residential buildings, the ALDREN project experience, is made.

Before being published, I suggest some improvements.

In the abstract I suggest the introduction of more main conclusions.

The authors should add the contribution of this stud to the state-of-the-art. What is the knowledge gap and how is this study new?

The figures can be improved.

The figure presented in the conclusion, should be moved to the results and should be discussed in the discussion area.

In the references more works from journals should be added or replaced.

In the final of the paper, the future works should be added.

Author Response

"Please see the attachment."

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 2 Report

The manuscript does not discuss a new or an innovative subject and for this reason its scientific soundness in limited. On the other hand, it performs an interesting literature review-like description on EC databases related to the energy efficiency of buildings and the structure of an existing project and these information have a strong potential to attract readers and citations.

The text is well-written with a small exception of the last paragraph of section 1.1 that fits better to the introduction since section 1.1 is supposed to describe the concept of the ALDREN project and not the structure or the aims of the manuscript. In addition, a quick review on small typos should be done to correct minors typos like the open parenthesis in line 157 etc.

 

Author Response

"Please see the attachment."

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Round 2

Reviewer 1 Report

In this paper a study of an overview on available knowledge for the data model definition of a building renovation passport for non-residential buildings, the ALDREN project experience, is made.

In the actual version, in general, all suggestions given by the reviewer was implemented.

Back to TopTop