The Fourth Industrial Revolution and the Sustainability Practices: A Comparative Automated Content Analysis Approach of Theory and Practice
Abstract
:1. Introduction
2. Content Text Analyses Methods
2.1. Introduction of a Classical Content Analysis
2.2. Automated Content Analyses
- Amini, Bienstock, and Narcum [38]: Status of corporate sustainability: A content analysis of Fortune 500 companies;
- Cheng and Edwards [16]: A comparative automated content analysis approach on the review of the sharing economy discourse in tourism and hospitality;
- Kim and Kim [39]: Sustainable Supply Chain Based on News Article and Sustainability Reports: Text Mining with Leximancer and DICTION;
- Lock and Araujo [40]: Visualizing the triple bottom line: A large-scale automated visual content analysis of European corporations’ website and social media images;
- Nunez-Mir et al. [28]: An automated content analysis of forestry research: are socioecological challenges being addressed?
- Paolone, F., Sardi, A., Sorano, E., and Ferraris, A. [41]: Integrated processing of sustainability accounting reports: a multi-utility company case study;
- Pucihar [17]: The digital transformation journey: content analysis of Electronic Markets articles and Bled eConference proceedings from 2012 to 2019;
- Roblek et al. [42]: The interaction between internet, sustainable development, and emergence of Society 5.0;
- Sullivan et al. [43]: Using industrial ecology and strategic management concepts to pursue the Sustainable Development Goals;
- Keller et al. [44]: News media coverage of climate change in India 1997–2016: Using automated content analysis to assess themes and topics.
3. Research Design
3.1. Data Collection
Literature Selection
3.2. Data Analysis
4. Results
4.1. The Thematic Concerns in the Scientific Journal’s Articles
4.2. The Thematic Concerns in the Newspapers and Magazines Articles
5. Discussion
5.1. Research Theme through the Research Source Characteristics
5.2. Research Theme from Scientific Journals Articles
5.3. Research Theme from Newspapers and Magazines Articles
5.4. The Comparison of the Analysis’s Results
6. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Conflicts of Interest
References
- United Nations. Transforming Our World: The 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development. United Nations 2015. Available online: https://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/post2015/transformingourworld (accessed on 22 September 2020).
- Ejsmont, K.; Gladysz, B.; Kluczek, A. Impact of Industry 4.0 on Sustainability—Bibliometric Literature Review. Sustainability 2020, 12, 5650. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Piccarozzi, M.; Aquilani, B.; Gatti, C. Industry 4.0 in Management Studies: A Systematic Literature Review. Sustainability 2018, 10, 3821. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Jerman, A.; Bach, M.P.; Bertoncelj, A. A Bibliometric and Topic Analysis on Future Competences at Smart Factories. Machines 2018, 6, 41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Jerman, A.; Erenda, I.; Bertoncelj, A. The Influence of Critical Factors on Business Model at a Smart Factory: A Case Study. Bus. Syst. Res. J. 2019, 10, 42–52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Birkel, H.S.; Veile, J.W.; Müller, J.M.; Hartmann, E.; Voigt, K.-I. Development of a Risk Framework for Industry 4.0 in the Context of Sustainability for Established Manufacturers. Sustainability 2019, 11, 384. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Müller, J.M.; Däschle, S. Business Model Innovation of Industry 4.0 Solution Providers towards Customer Process Innovation. Processes 2018, 6, 260. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Oztemel, E.; Gursev, S. Literature review of Industry 4.0 and related technologies. J. Intell. Manuf. 2018, 31, 127–182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Van Dijk, T.A. News Analysis; Routledge: Hillsdale, NJ, USA, 2013. [Google Scholar]
- Reah, D. The Language of Newspapers; Routledge: London, UK, 1998. [Google Scholar]
- Lööw, J.; Abrahamsson, L.; Johansson, J. Mining 4.0—The Impact of New Technology from a Work Place Perspective. Min. Met. Explor. 2019, 36, 701–707. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Xu, S.; Stienmetz, J.; Ashton, M. How will service robots redefine leadership in hotel management? A Delphi approach. Int. J. Contemp. Hosp. Manag. 2020, 32, 2217–2237. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Baldwin, R. The Globotics Upheaval: Globalization, Robotics, and the Future of Work; Oxford University Press: Oxford, UK, 2019. [Google Scholar]
- Nuvolari, A. Understanding successive industrial revolutions: A “development block” approach. Environ. Innov. Soc. Transit. 2019, 32, 33–44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ghobakhloo, M. Industry 4.0, digitization, and opportunities for sustainability. J. Clean. Prod. 2020, 252, 119869. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cheng, M.; Edwards, D. A comparative automated content analysis approach on the review of the sharing economy discourse in tourism and hospitality. Curr. Issues Tour. 2017, 22, 35–49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pucihar, A. The digital transformation journey: Content analysis of Electronic Markets articles and Bled eConference proceedings from 2012 to 2019. Electron. Mark. 2020, 30, 29–37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pool, I.D.S.; Berelson, B. Content Analysis in Communication Research. Am. Sociol. Rev. 1952, 17, 515. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Berelson, B.R. Content analysis. In Handbook of Social Psychology; Lindsey, G., Ed.; Addison-Welsley: Reading, MA, USA, 1954; pp. 488–522. [Google Scholar]
- Kracauer, S. The Challenge of Qualitative Content Analysis. Public Opin. Q. 1952, 16, 631. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Schreier, M. Qualitative Content Analysis in Practice; Sage: London, UK, 2012. [Google Scholar]
- Parker, E.B.; Holsti, O.R. Content Analysis for the Social Sciences and Humanities. Am. Soc. Rev. 1970, 35, 356. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- George, A.L. Quantitative and qualitative approaches to content analysis. In Trends in Content Analysis; Pool, I.D.S., Ed.; University of Illinois Press: Urbana, IL, USA, 1959; pp. 7–32. [Google Scholar]
- Mayring, P. Qualitative content analysis. Qual. Soc. Res. 2000, 1, 12–19. [Google Scholar]
- Kohlbachter, F. The use of qualitative content analysis in case study research. Qual. Soc. Res. 2005, 7, 1–23. [Google Scholar]
- Krippendorff, K. Measuring the Reliability of Qualitative Text Analysis Data. Qual. Quant. 2004, 38, 787–800. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Hsieh, H.-F.; Shannon, S.E. Three Approaches to Qualitative Content Analysis. Qual. Health Res. 2005, 15, 1277–1288. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nunez-Mir, G.C.; Iannone, B.V.; Pijanowski, B.C.; Kong, N.; Fei, S. Automated content analysis: Addressing the big literature challenge in ecology and evolution. Methods Ecol. Evol. 2016, 7, 1262–1272. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Shapiro, G.; Markoff, J. A Matter of Definition. Text Anal. Soc. Sci. 2020, 1, 9–32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mehl, M.R.; Gill, J.A. Computerized content analysis. In Advanced Methods for Behavioral Research on the Internet; Gosling, S., Johnson, J., Eds.; American Psychological Association Publications: Washington, DC, USA, 2010; pp. 34–59. [Google Scholar]
- Blei, D.M. Topic modeling and digital humanities. J. Dig. Hum. 2012, 2, 8–11. [Google Scholar]
- Usai, A.; Pironti, M.; Mital, M.; Mejri, C.A. Knowledge discovery out of text data: A systematic review via text mining. J. Knowl. Manag. 2018, 22, 1471–1488. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- McNamara, D.S.; Graesser, A.; McCarthy, P.M.; Cai, Z. Automated Evaluation of Text and Discourse with Coh-Metrix; Cambridge University Press: New York, NY, USA, 2014. [Google Scholar]
- Blaschke, T. Object based image analysis for remote sensing. ISPRS J. Photogramm. Remote. Sens. 2010, 65, 2–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Shelley, M.; Krippendorff, K. Content Analysis: An Introduction to its Methodology. J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 1984, 79, 240. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Vaismoradi, M.; Turunen, H.; Bondas, T. Content analysis and thematic analysis: Implications for conducting a qualitative descriptive study. Nurs. Health Sci. 2013, 15, 398–405. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Smith, A.E.; Humphreys, M.S. Evaluation of unsupervised semantic mapping of natural language with Leximancer concept mapping. Behav. Res. Methods 2006, 38, 262–279. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Amini, M.; Bienstock, C.C.; Narcum, J.A. Status of corporate sustainability: A content analysis of Fortune 500 companies. Bus. Strat. Environ. 2018, 27, 1450–1461. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kim, D.; Kim, S. Sustainable Supply Chain Based on News Articles and Sustainability Reports: Text Mining with Leximancer and DICTION. Sustainability 2017, 9, 1008. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Lock, I.; Araujo, T. Visualizing the triple bottom line: A large-scale automated visual content analysis of European corporations’ website and social media images. Corp. Soc. Responsib. Environ. Manag. 2020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Paolone, F.; Sardi, A.; Sorano, E.; Ferraris, A. Integrated processing of sustainability accounting reports: A multi-utility company case study. Meditari Account. Res. 2020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Roblek, V.; Meško, M.; Pejic-Bach, M.; Thorpe, O.; Šprajc, P. The Interaction between Internet, Sustainable Development, and Emergence of Society 5.0. Data 2020, 5, 80. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sullivan, K.; Thomas, S.; Rosano, M. Using industrial ecology and strategic management concepts to pursue the Sustainable Development Goals. J. Clean. Prod. 2018, 174, 237–246. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Keller, T.R.; Hase, V.; Thaker, J.; Mahl, D.; Schäfer, M.S. News Media Coverage of Climate Change in India 1997–2016: Using automated content analysis to assess themes and topics. Environ. Commun. 2020, 14, 219–235. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bednarek, M. Evaluation in Media Discourse: Analysis of a Newspaper Corpus; Continuum: London, UK, 2006. [Google Scholar]
- McCombs, B.L. The Learner-Centered Model: Implications for Research Approaches. In Interdisciplinary Handbook of the Person-Centered Approach; Springer Science and Business Media LLC: New York, NY, USA, 2013; pp. 335–352. [Google Scholar]
- Schmidt, A.; Ivanova, A.; Schäfer, M.S. Media attention for climate change around the world: A comparative analysis of newspaper coverage in 27 countries. Glob. Environ. Chang. 2013, 23, 1233–1248. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Schweinsberg, S.; Darcy, S.; Cheng, M. The agenda setting power of news media in framing the future role of tourism in protected areas. Tour. Manag. 2017, 62, 241–252. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Thetela, P. Evaluated entities and parameters of value in academic research articles. Engl. Specif. Purp. 1997, 16, 101–118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Evangelista, P.; Santoro, L.; Thomas, A. A Systematic literature review from 2000–2016. Sustainability 2018, 10, 1627. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Moher, D.; Liberati, A.; Tetzlaff, J.; Altman, D.G.; Prisma Group. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: The PRISMA statement. PLoS Med. 2009, 6, e1000097. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Proquest. News & Newspapers. Available online: https://about.proquest.com/libraries/academic/news-newspapers/?page=2 (accessed on 18 August 2020).
- Bach, M.P.; Krstić, Ž.; Seljan, S.; Turulja, L. Text Mining for Big Data Analysis in Financial Sector: A Literature Review. Sustainability 2019, 11, 1277. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Leximancer. Leximancer User Guide. 2020. Available online: https://info.leximancer.com/ (accessed on 2 May 2020).
- Watson, M.; Smith, A.; Watter, S. Leximancer Concept Mapping of Patient Case Studies. In Lecture Notes in Computer Science; Springer Science and Business Media LLC: Berlin, Germany, 2005; pp. 1232–1238. [Google Scholar]
- Angus, D.; Rintel, S.; Wiles, J. Making sense of big text: A visual-first approach for analysing text data using Leximancer and Discursis. Int. J. Soc. Res. Methodol. 2013, 16, 261–267. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Campbell, C.; Pitt, L.F.; Parent, M.; Berthon, P.R. Understanding Consumer Conversations around Ads in a Web 2.0 World. J. Advert. 2011, 40, 87–102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Esser, F.; Hanitzsch, T. (Eds.) The Handbook of Comparative Communication Research; Routledge: Abingdon, UK, 2013. [Google Scholar]
- Beier, G.; Niehoff, S.; Ziems, T.; Xue, B. Sustainability aspects of a digitalized industry – A comparative study from China and Germany. Int. J. Precis. Eng. Manuf. Technol. 2017, 4, 227–234. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fujii, M.; Fujita, T.; Dong, L.; Lu, C.; Geng, Y.; Behera, S.K.; Park, H.S.; Chiu, A.S. Possibility of developing low-carbon industries through urban symbiosis in Asian cities. J. Clean. Prod. 2016, 114, 376–386. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Beier, G.; Ullrich, A.; Niehoff, S.; Reißig, M.; Habich, M. Industry 4.0: How it is defined from a sociotechnical perspective and how much sustainability it includes—A literature review. J. Clean. Prod. 2020, 259, 120856. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lytos, A.; Lagkas, T.; Sarigiannidis, P.G.; Zervakis, M.; Livanos, G. Towards smart farming: Systems, frameworks and exploitation of multiple sources. Comput. Netw. 2020, 172, 107147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mocnej, J.; Pekar, A.; Seah, W.K.; Papcun, P.; Kajati, E.; Cupkova, D.; Koziorek, J.; Zolotova, I. Quality-enabled decentralized IoT architecture with efficient resources utilization. Robot. Comput. Manuf. 2021, 67, 102001. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Braccini, A.M.; Margherita, E.G. Exploring Organizational Sustainability of Industry 4.0 under the Triple Bottom Line: The Case of a Manufacturing Company. Sustainability 2018, 11, 36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Da Xu, L.; Xu, E.L.; Li, L. Industry 4.0: State of the art and future trends. Int. J. Prod. Res. 2018, 56, 2941–2962. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Altay, N.; Gunasekaran, A.; Dubey, R.; Childe, S.J. Agility and resilience as antecedents of supply chain performance under moderating effects of organizational culture within the humanitarian setting: A dynamic capability view. Prod. Plan. Control. 2018, 29, 1158–1174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Papadopoulos, T.; Gunasekaran, A.; Dubey, R.; Altay, N.; Childe, S.J.; Fosso-Wamba, S. The role of Big Data in explaining disaster resilience in supply chains for sustainability. J. Clean. Prod. 2017, 142, 1108–1118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Frank, A.G.; Dalenogare, L.S.; Ayala, N.F. Industry 4.0 technologies: Implementation patterns in manufacturing companies. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 2019, 210, 15–26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yadav, G.; Luthra, S.; Jakhar, S.K.; Mangla, S.K.; Rai, D.P. A framework to overcome sustainable supply chain challenges through solution measures of industry 4.0 and circular economy: An automotive case. J. Clean. Prod. 2020, 254, 120112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- de Sousa Jabbour, A.B.L.; Jabbour, C.J.C.; Foropon, C.; Godinho Filho, M. When titans meet–Can industry 4.0 revolutionize the environmentally-sustainable manufacturing wave? The role of critical success factors. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Chang. 2018, 132, 18–25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Reddy, N.; Chen, L.; Zhang, Y.; Yang, Y. Reducing environmental pollution of the textile industry using keratin as alternative sizing agent to poly(vinyl alcohol). J. Clean. Prod. 2014, 65, 561–567. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Stock, T.; Obenaus, M.; Kunz, S.; Kohl, H. Industry 4.0 as enabler for a sustainable development: A qualitative assessment of its ecological and social potential. Process. Saf. Environ. Prot. 2018, 118, 254–267. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kaymak, T.; Bektas, E. Corporate Social Responsibility and Governance: Information Disclosure in Multinational Corporations. Corp. Soc. Responsib. Environ. Manag. 2017, 24, 555–569. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kantabutra, S.; Ketprapakorn, N. Toward a theory of corporate sustainability: A theoretical integration and exploration. J. Clean. Prod. 2020, 270, 122292. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Santana, M.; Cobo, M. What is the future of work? A science mapping analysis. Eur. Manag. J. 2020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Luthra, S.; Kumar, A.; Zavadskas, E.K.; Mangla, S.K.; Garza-Reyes, J.A. Industry 4.0 as an enabler of sustainability diffusion in supply chain: An analysis of influential strength of drivers in an emerging economy. Int. J. Prod. Res. 2019, 58, 1505–1521. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ramakrishna, S.; Ngowi, A.; De Jager, H.; Awuzie, B.O. Emerging Industrial Revolution: Symbiosis of Industry 4.0 and Circular Economy: The Role of Universities. Sci. Technol. Soc. 2020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nascimento, D.L.M.; Alencastro, V.; Quelhas, O.L.G.; Caiado, R.G.G.; Garza-Reyes, J.A.; Rocha-Lona, L.; Tortorella, G. Exploring Industry 4.0 technologies to enable circular economy practices in a manufacturing context. J. Manuf. Technol. Manag. 2019, 30, 607–627. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Munsamy, M.; Telukdarie, A.; Fresner, J. Business process centric energy modelling. Bus. Process. Manag. J. 2019, 25, 1867–1890. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kohtamäki, M.; Parida, V.; Oghazi, P.; Gebauer, H.; Baines, T. Digital servitization business models in ecosystems: A theory of the firm. J. Bus. Res. 2019, 104, 380–392. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kramer, A.; Kramer, K.Z. The potential impact of the Covid-19 pandemic on occupational status, work from home, and occupational mobility. J. Vocat. Behav. 2020, 119, 103442. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, G.; Hou, Y.; Wu, A. Fourth Industrial Revolution: Technological drivers, impacts and coping methods. Chin. Geogr. Sci. 2017, 27, 626–637. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Ritter, T.; Pedersen, C.L. Digitisation capability and the digitalization of business models in business-to-business firms: Past, present, and future. Ind. Mark. Manag. 2020, 86, 180–190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Obiso, J.J.A.; Himang, C.M.; Ocampo, L.A.; Bongo, M.F.; Caballes, S.A.A.; Abellana, D.P.M.; Deocaris, C.C.; Padua, R.R.A., Jr. Management of Industry 4.0–reviewing intrinsic and extrinsic adoption drivers and barriers. Int. J. Tech. Manag. 2019, 81, 210–257. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Peura, P.; Haapanen, A.; Reini, K.; Törmä, H. Regional impacts of sustainable energy in western Finland. J. Clean. Prod. 2018, 187, 85–97. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Ranängen, H.; Lindman, Å. A path towards sustainability for the Nordic mining industry. J. Clean. Prod. 2017, 151, 43–52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lu, C.-J.; Yang, C.-T.; Yen, H.-F. Stackelberg game approach for sustainable production-inventory model with collaborative investment in technology for reducing carbon emissions. J. Clean. Prod. 2020, 270, 121963. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tsai, W.-H.; Lu, Y.-H. A Framework of Production Planning and Control with Carbon Tax under Industry 4.0. Sustainability 2018, 10, 3221. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Tsai, W.-H.; Jhong, S.-Y. Production decision model with carbon tax for the knitted footwear industry under activity-based costing. J. Clean. Prod. 2019, 207, 1150–1162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Aureli, S.; Gigli, S.; Medei, R.; Supino, E. The value relevance of environmental, social, and governance disclosure: Evidence from Dow Jones Sustainability World Index listed companies. Corp. Soc. Responsib. Environ. Manag. 2019, 27, 43–52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lali, L. Beyond the 3 Rs: How Can Singapore Move Forward on Sustainability? The Business Times, 30 May 2020. Available online: https://www.businesstimes.com.sg/brunch/beyond-the-3-rs-how-can-singapore-move-forward-on-sustainability(accessed on 6 July 2020).
- Stevenson, D. Are ESG and Sustainability the New Alpha Mantra? Financial Time, 1 April 2020. Available online: https://www.ft.com/content/6cee0b48-7760-46a5-9759-243aaaff7f8a(accessed on 10 July 2020).
- Gibbens, S. 15 Ways the Trump Administration Has Changed Environmental Policies. National Geographics, 1 February 2019. Available online: https://www.nationalgeographic.com/environment/2019/02/15-ways-trump-administration-impacted-environment/(accessed on 9 July 2020).
- Khan, M. Brussels Ramps up Emissions Goals as MEPs Declare ‘Climate Emergency’. Financial Time, 28 November 2019. Available online: https://www.ft.com/content/cadca90e-11da-11ea-a7e6-62bf4f9e548a(accessed on 12 September 2020).
- Wincuinas, J. Sustainable and Actionable: A Study of Asset-Owner Priorities for ESG investing in Asia. Available online: https://eiuperspectives.economist.com/sustainability/sustainable-and-actionable-study-asset-owner-priorities-esg-investing-asia (accessed on 9 July 2020).
- Hay, G. Breakingviews—Sustainable Investing Will Wind up in the Dock. Reuters. 2019. Available online: https://www.reuters.com/article/us-global-sustainability-breakingviews-idUSKBN1YZ0PC (accessed on 7 July 2020).
- Landrum, S. Millennials Driving Brands to Practice Socially Responsible Marketing. Forbes Magazin, 17 March 2017. Available online: https://www.forbes.com/sites/sarahlandrum/2017/03/17/millennials-driving-brands-to-practice-socially-responsible-marketing/(accessed on 5 July 2020).
- Wong, K. How to Be a More Conscious Consumer, Even If You’re on a budget. The New York Times, 1 October 2019. Available online: https://www.nytimes.com/2019/10/01/smarter-living/sustainabile-shopping-conscious-consumer.html(accessed on 7 July 2020).
- The Economist. Big Business is Beginning to Accept Broader Social Responsibilities. Available online: https://deliverchange.economist.com/article/big-business-beginning-accept-broader-social-responsibilities/ (accessed on 9 July 2020).
- Jessop, S. Deutsche Bank Targets 200 Billion Euros of Sustainable Investment by 2025. Reuters. 2020. Available online: https://www.reuters.com/article/us-deutsche-bank-sustainability-idUSKBN22P132 (accessed on 7 July 2020).
- Neghaiwi Hughes, B. Credit Suisse Sets Up Investment Banking Sustainability Advisory. Reuters. 2019. Available online: https://uk.reuters.com/article/uk-credit-suisse-gp-sustainability/credit-suisse-sets-up-investment-banking-sustainability-advisory-idUKKBN21L2Z6 (accessed on 9 July 2020).
- Gitlin, M.J. California Set to Ban All Heavy Diesel Trucks and Vans by 2045. Ars Technica, 26 June 2020. Available online: https://arstechnica.com/cars/2020/06/california-set-to-ban-all-heavy-diesel-trucks-and-vans-by-2045/(accessed on 9 July 2020).
- Thomasson, E. Zalando to Push ‘Sustainable’ Fashion, Cut Emissions. Reuters. 2019. Available online: https://www.reuters.com/article/us-zalando-environment/zalando-to-push-sustainable-fashion-cut-emissions-idUSKBN1X90X8 (accessed on 9 July 2020).
- Cobburn, C. Why Industry is Going Green on the Quiet. The Guardian, 8 September 2019. Available online: https://www.theguardian.com/science/2019/sep/08/producers-keep-sustainable-practices-secret(accessed on 9 July 2020).
- Washington Post. Transcript: A World in Balance—Solutions for Sustainability. Available online: https://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/post-live/wp/2017/11/16/transcript-a-world-in-balance-solutions-for-sustainability/ (accessed on 9 July 2020).
- Vaughan, A. BP Aims to Invest More in Renewables and Clean Energy. The Guardian, 6 February 2018. Available online: https://www.theguardian.com/business/2018/feb/06/bp-aims-to-invest-more-in-renewables-and-clean-energy(accessed on 9 July 2020).
- Sonnemaker, T. Mercedes-Benz Parent Company Daimler is Preparing to Lay Off 15,000 Workers as It Tries to Adapt to Electric Cars. Business Insider, 10 February 2020. Available online: https://www.businessinsider.com/mercedes-benz-parent-daimler-reportedly-planning-15000-layoffs-2020-2(accessed on 9 July 2020).
- Angel, M. Corrected-Nestle Invests $45 Mln a Year in Cocoa Sustainability. Reuters. 2019. Available online: https://in.reuters.com/article/nestle-cocoa-sustainability-idINL8N28J4Z0 (accessed on 8 July 2020).
- Monaghan, A. Businesses Must Address Impact of Next Industrial Revolution, Says Siemens Boss. The Guardian, 16 July 2018. Available online: https://www.theguardian.com/business/2018/jul/15/global-workforce-will-be-decimated-by-fourth-revolution-says-siemens-boss(accessed on 8 July 2020).
- Thomspon, J. Big Investors’ Sustainability Push Drives Demand for Environmental Expertise. Financial Time. 2020. Available online: https://www.ft.com/content/362fdc36-3b97-11ea-b84f-a62c46f39bc2 (accessed on 9 July 2020).
- Davidson, H. China on Track To Lead in Renewables as US Retreats, Report Says. The Guardian, 10 January 2018. Available online: https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2018/jan/10/china-on-track-to-lead-in-renewables-as-us-retreats-report-says(accessed on 9 July 2020).
- Friedman, R. Sustainability: Moving the Conversation Forward. The Economist, 3 December 2018; Inteligence Unit. Available online: https://eiuperspectives.economist.com/sustainability/sustainability-moving-conversation-forward(accessed on 10 July 2020).
- McFarlane, C. Are Smart Cities The Pathway To Blockchain And Cryptocurrency Adoption? The Forbes, 18 October 2019. Available online: https://www.forbes.com/sites/chrissamcfarlane/2019/10/18/are-smart-cities-the-pathway-to-blockchain-and-cryptocurrency-adoption/#7a10b7846093(accessed on 5 July 2020).
- Rogers, B. Cities are Not Dead—They Will Get Younger. Financial Times, 24 May 2020. Available online: https://www.ft.com/content/d4fff7a2-9b63-11ea-871b-edeb99a20c6e(accessed on 9 July 2020).
- Gold, M. Accelerating Urban Intelligence: People, Business and the Cities of Tomorrow. The Economist, 27 April 2019; Intelligence Unit. Available online: https://eiuperspectives.economist.com/technology-innovation/accelerating-urban-intelligence-people-business-and-cities-tomorrow/white-paper/accelerating-urban-intelligence-people-business-and-cities-tomorrow(accessed on 7 July 2020).
- Rudolph, C.W.; Allan, B.; Clark, M.; Hertel, G.; Hirschi, A.; Kunze, F.; Shockley, K.; Shoss, M.; Sonnentag, S.; Zacher, H. Pandemics: Implications for Research and Practice in Industrial and Organizational Psychology. Ind. Org. Psy. 2020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Van den Heuvel, M. How COVID Turned a Spotlight on Weak Worker Rights. The Harvard Gazzete. 23 June 2020. Available online: https://news.harvard.edu/gazette/story/2020/06/labor-law-experts-discuss-workers-rights-in-covid-19/ (accessed on 15 September 2020).
- Gustin, G. Think Covid-19 Disrupted the Food Chain? Wait and See What Climate Change Will Do. Inside Climate News, 7 July 2020. Available online: https://insideclimatenews.org/news/06072020/coronavirus-agriculture-food-chain-future-climate-change(accessed on 7 July 2020).
- Ghisellini, P.; Cialani, C.; Ulgiati, S. A review on circular economy: The expected transition to a balanced interplay of environmental and economic systems. J. Clean. Prod. 2016, 114, 11–32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Harari, Y.N. The World after Coronavirus. The Financial Times, 20 March 2020. Available online: https://www.ft.com/content/19d90308-6858-11ea-a3c9-1fe6fedcca75(accessed on 17 July 2020).
- Bapuji, H.; de Bakker, F.G.; Brown, J.A.; Higgins, C.; Rehbein, K.; Spicer, A. Business and Society Research in Times of the Corona Crisis. Buss. Soc. 2020, 59, 1067–1078. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hua, J.; Shaw, R. Coronavirus (Covid-19) “infodemic” and emerging issues through a data lens: The case of China. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2020, 17, 2309. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Boot, A.W.A.; Carletti, E.; Kotz, H.-H.; Krahnen, J.P.; Pelizzon, L.; Subrahmanyam, M.G. Corona and Financial Stability 3.0: Try Equity—Risk Sharing For Companies, Large and Small. SAFE Policy Lett. 2020, 81. Available online: https://safe-frankfurt.de/policy-center/policy-publications/policy-publ-detailsview/publicationname/corona-and-financial-stability-30-try-equity-risk-sharing-for-companies-large-and-small.html/ (accessed on 4 September 2020).
- Trippel, E. How green is green enough? The changing landscape of financing a sustainable European economy. ERA Forum 2020, 1–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Goerzen, A.; Iskander, S.P.; Hofstetter, J.S. The effect of institutional pressures on business-led interventions to improve social compliance among emerging market suppliers in global value chains. J. Int. Bus. Policy 2020, 1–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Payne, A. Germany is Beginning a Universal-Basic-Income Trial with People Getting $1400 a Month for 3 Years. The Business Insider. 2020. Available online: https://www.businessinsider.com/germany-begins-universal-basic-income-trial-three-years-2020-8 (accessed on 9 October 2020).
- Grah, B.; Dimovski, V.; Peterlin, J. Managing Sustainable Urban Tourism Development: The Case of Ljubljana. Sustainability 2020, 12, 792. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Bartoli, G.; Fantacci, R.; Gei, F.; Marabissi, D.; Micciullo, L. A novel emergency management platform for smart public safety. Int. J. Commun. Syst. 2013, 28, 928–943. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yigitcanlar, T.; Butler, L.; Windle, E.; DeSouza, K.C.; Mehmood, R.; Corchado, J.M. Can Building “Artificially Intelligent Cities” Safeguard Humanity from Natural Disasters, Pandemics, and Other Catastrophes? An Urban Scholar’s Perspective. Sensors 2020, 20, 2988. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Verma, S.; Gustafsson, A. Investigating the emerging COVID-19 research trends in the field of business and management: A bibliometric analysis approach. J. Bus. Res. 2020, 118, 253–261. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Keesara, S.; Jonas, A.; Schulman, K. Covid-19 and Health Care’s Digital Revolution. N. Engl. J. Med. 2020, 382, e82. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Taylor, C.B.; E. Fitzsimmons-Craft, E.; Graham, A.K. Digital technology can revolutionize mental health services delivery: The COVID-19 crisis as a catalyst for change. Int. J. Eat. Disord. 2020, 53, 1015–1181. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Roblek, V.; Pejić Bach, M.; Meško, M.; Bertoncel, T. Best practices of the social innovations in the framework of the e-government evolution. Amfiteatru Econ. 2020, 22, 275–302. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Oni, A.; Oni, S.; Mbarika, V.; Ayo, C.K. Empirical study of user acceptance of online political participation: Integrating Civic Voluntarism Model and Theory of Reasoned Action. Gov. Inf. Q. 2017, 34, 317–328. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Elavarasan, R.M.; Afridhis, S.; Vijayaraghavan, R.R.; Subramaniam, U.; Nurunnabi, M. SWOT analysis: A framework for comprehensive evaluation of drivers and barriers for renewable energy development in significant countries. Energy Rep. 2020, 6, 1838–1864. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Stop This Thing. Available online: https://stopthesethings.com/2019/01/06/germanys-renewable-energy-fail-german-co2-emissions-10-times-higher-than-nuclear-powered-france/ (accessed on 10 October 2020).
- Blackmon, D. Renewables Won’t Save Us If the Electric Grid Is Not Ready. Forbes, 30 September 2020. Available online: https://www.forbes.com/sites/davidblackmon/2020/09/30/renewables-wont-save-us-if-the-electric-grid-is-not-ready/?fbclid=IwAR0u12ZVqn5kFh0Kd51_o65MKHTJvZojI070gc7iqJm62gAVGzAOa3oLTu8#31d8a1f87abf(accessed on 10 October 2020).
- Bersano, A.; Segantin, S.; Falcone, N.; Panella, B.; Testoni, R. Evaluation of a potential reintroduction of nuclear energy in Italy to accelerate the energy transition. Electr. J. 2020, 33, 106813. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shellenberger, M. Renewables Threaten German Economy & Energy Supply, McKinsey Warns in New Report. Forbes, 5 September 2019. Available online: https://www.forbes.com/sites/michaelshellenberger/2019/09/05/renewables-threaten-german-economy-energy-supply-mckinsey-warns-in-new-report/#619733688e48(accessed on 10 October 2020).
- Masum, M.H.; Latiff, A.R.A.; Osman, M.N.H. Voluntary Reporting, Sustainable Reporting and Transition Economy. Int. Bus. Account. Res. J. 2020, 4, 81–88. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Man, M.; Bogeanu-Popa, M.-M. Impact of Non-Financial Information on Sustainable Reporting of Organisations’ Performance: Case Study on the Companies Listed on the Bucharest Stock Exchange. Sustainability 2020, 12, 2179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
Theme | Hits | Concepts |
---|---|---|
Sustainability | 435 | sustainability, industry, manufacturing, management, supply, data, industrial, waste |
Technologies | 252 | technologies, energy, systems, efficiency |
Model | 239 | model, process, production, business, development |
Environmental | 114 | environmental, performance, economic |
Emissions | 38 | emissions, carbon, consumption |
Theme | Hits | Concepts |
---|---|---|
Sustainability | 1825 | sustainability, investment, ESG, environmental, financial, market, social, investors, Asia, priorities, green, research, management, report, corporate, products |
Energy | 1098 | energy, change, climate, global, impact, supply, industry, renewable, risk, economy, emissions |
Business | 991 | business, data, cities, technology, development, intelligence, government, growth, services |
Companies | 681 | companies, work, standards, workers |
World | 394 | world, people, power |
Oil | 98 | oil |
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. |
© 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Roblek, V.; Thorpe, O.; Bach, M.P.; Jerman, A.; Meško, M. The Fourth Industrial Revolution and the Sustainability Practices: A Comparative Automated Content Analysis Approach of Theory and Practice. Sustainability 2020, 12, 8497. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12208497
Roblek V, Thorpe O, Bach MP, Jerman A, Meško M. The Fourth Industrial Revolution and the Sustainability Practices: A Comparative Automated Content Analysis Approach of Theory and Practice. Sustainability. 2020; 12(20):8497. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12208497
Chicago/Turabian StyleRoblek, Vasja, Oshane Thorpe, Mirjana Pejic Bach, Andrej Jerman, and Maja Meško. 2020. "The Fourth Industrial Revolution and the Sustainability Practices: A Comparative Automated Content Analysis Approach of Theory and Practice" Sustainability 12, no. 20: 8497. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12208497
APA StyleRoblek, V., Thorpe, O., Bach, M. P., Jerman, A., & Meško, M. (2020). The Fourth Industrial Revolution and the Sustainability Practices: A Comparative Automated Content Analysis Approach of Theory and Practice. Sustainability, 12(20), 8497. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12208497