Understanding Online Consumer Behavior and eWOM Strategies for Sustainable Business Management in the Tourism Industry
Abstract
:1. Introduction
2. Literature Review
3. Methodology
4. Exploratory Analysis of the Results
5. Implications
6. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Manes, E.; Tchetchik, A. The role of electronic word of mouth in reducing information asymmetry: An empirical investigation of online hotel booking. J. Bus. Res. 2018, 85, 185–196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chew, S.; Metheney, E.; Teague, T. Modelling and simulation of the formation of social networks. Soc. Sci. 2017, 6, 79. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Hubert, M.; Blut, M.; Brock, C.; Backhaus, C.; Eberhardt, T. Acceptance of smartphone-based mobile shopping: Mobile benefits, customer characteristics, perceived risks, and the impact of application context. Psychol. Mark. 2017, 34, 175–194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Reyes-Menendez, A.; Palos-Sanchez, P.R.; Saura, J.R.; Martin-Velicia, F. Understanding the influence of wireless communications and wi-fi access on customer loyalty: A behavioral model system. Wirel. Commun. Mob. Comput. 2018, 2018, 3487398. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Saura, J.R.; Reyes-Menendez, A.; Palos-Sanchez, P. Un análisis de sentimiento en Twitter con machine learning: Identificando el sentimiento sobre las ofertas de#BlackFriday. Rev. Espacios. 2018, 39, 16. [Google Scholar]
- Zhang, K.Z.; Cheung, C.M.; Lee, M.K. Examining the moderating effect of inconsistent reviews and its gender differences on consumers’ online shopping decision. Int. J. Inf. Manag. 2014, 34, 89–98. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Saura, J.R.; Palos-Sanchez, P.; Reyes-Menendez, A. Marketing a través de aplicaciones móviles de turismo (m-tourism). Un estudio exploratorio. Int. J. World Tour. 2017, 4, 45–56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- McCarthy, L.; Stock, D.; Verma, R. How travelers use online and social media channels to make hotel-choice decisions. Cornell Hosp. Rep. 2010, 10, 6–18. [Google Scholar]
- Anastasiei, B.; Dospinescu, N. Facebook advertising: Relationship between types of message, brand attitude and perceived buying risk. Ann. Constantin Brancusi Univ. Targu-Jiu 2017, 6, 18–26. [Google Scholar]
- Comscore. Comscore Score Worldwide Path to Purchase Report. Available online: https://www.comscore.com/Products/Marketing-Impact/Path-to-Purchase-Research (accessed on 1 January 2020).
- Abubakar, A.M. Does eWOM influence destination trust and travel intention: A medical tourism perspective. Econ. Res. Ekon. Istraživanja 2016, 29, 598–611. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Anastasiei, B.; Dospinescu, N. A model of the relationships between the Big Five personality traits and the motivations to deliver word-of-mouth online. Psihologija 2018, 51, 215–227. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Hossain, M.; Jahan, N.; Fang, Y.; Hoque, S. Nexus of electronic word-of-mouth to social networking sites: A sustainable chatter of new digital social media. Sustainability 2019, 11, 759. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- European Commission. Mainstreaming Sustainable Development into EU Policies 2009; Review of the European Union Strategy for Sustainable Development: Brussels, Belgium, 2009. [Google Scholar]
- Ehnert, I.; Harry, W.; Zink, K.J. (Eds.) Sustainability and Human Resource Management: Developing Sustainable Business Organizations; Springer Science & Business Media: Berlin, Germany, 2013; ISBN 9783642375248. [Google Scholar]
- Reyes-Menendez, A.; Saura, J.R.; Alvarez-Alonso, C. Understanding# WorldEnvironmentDay user opinions in Twitter: A topic-based sentiment analysis approach. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2018, 15, 2537. [Google Scholar]
- Palos-Sanchez, P.R.; Correia, M.B. The collaborative economy based analysis of demand: Study of Airbnb case in Spain and Portugal. J. Theor. Appl. Electron. Commer. Res. 2018, 13, 85–98. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Reyes-Menendez, A.; Saura, J.R.; Filipe, F. The importance of behavioral data to identify online fake reviews for tourism businesses: A systematic review. Peer J. Comput. Sci. 2019, 5, e219. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Papathanassis, A.; Knolle, F. Exploring the adoption and processing of online holiday reviews: A grounded theory approach. Tour. Manag. 2011, 32, 215–224. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pai, M.Y.; Chu, H.C.; Wang, S.C.; Chen, Y.M. Electronic word of mouth analysis for service experience. Expert Syst. Appl. 2013, 40, 1993–2006. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Saura, J.R.; Reyes-Menendez, A.; Filipe, F. Comparing data-driven methods for extracting knowledge from user generated content. J. Open Innov. Technol. Mark. Complex. 2019, 5, 74. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Mauri, A.G.; Minazzi, R. Web reviews influence on expectations and purchasing intentions of hotel potential customers. Int. J. Hosp. Manag. 2013, 34, 99–107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- World Tourism Organization. UNWTO Tourism Highlights 2017 Edition. Available online: https://www.e-unwto.org/doi/pdf/10.18111/9789284419029 (accessed on 1 January 2020).
- Robson, C. Real World Research: A Resource for Social Scientists and Practitioner-Researchers, 2nd ed.; Blackwell: Oxford, UK, 2002; ISBN 978-0631213055. [Google Scholar]
- Ritchie, J.; Lewis, J.; Nicholls, C.M.; Ormston, R. (Eds.) Qualitative Research Practice: A Guide for Social Science Students and Researchers, 2nd ed.; Sage: London, UK, 2013; ISBN 978-1446209127. [Google Scholar]
- Tranfield, D.; Denyer, D.; Smart, P. Towards a methodology for developing evidence-informed management knowledge by means of systematic review. Br. J. Manag. 2003, 14, 207–222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Banerjee, A.; Duflo, E.; Glennerster, R.; Kinnan, C. The miracle of microfinance? Evidence from a randomized evaluation. Am. Econ. J. Appl. Econ. 2015, 7, 22–53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Shea, B.J.; Hamel, C.; Wells, G.A.; Bouter, L.M.; Kristjansson, E.; Grimshaw, J.; Henry, D.A.; Boers, M. AMSTAR Is a Reliable and Valid Measurement Tool to Assess the Methodological Quality of Systematic Reviews. Available online: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19230606 (accessed on 12 September 2017).
- Bosch, M.V.; Sang, A.O. Urban natural environments as nature based solutions for improved public health—A systematic review of reviews. Environ. Res. 2017, 158, 373–384. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Bassett, D.J. Who wants to live forever? Living, dying and grieving in our digital society. Soc. Sci. 2015, 4, 1127–1139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Thorpe, R.; Holt, R.; Macpherson, A.; Pittaway, L. Using knowledge within small and medium-sized firms: A systematic review of the evidence. Int. J. Manag. Rev. 2005, 7, 257–281. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Luo, Y.; Chen, Y.; Zheng, W. A literature review on evaluating tourism destinations. In ISME 2016—Information Science and Management Engineering IV; SCITEPRESS–Science and Technology Publications: Wuhan, China, 2016; pp. 329–334. ISBN 978-989-758-208-0. [Google Scholar]
- Comerio, N.; Strozzi, F. Tourism and its economic impact: A literature review using bibliometric tools. Tour. Econ. 2018, 25, 109–131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Huete-Alcocer, N. A literature review of word of mouth and electronic word of mouth: Implications for consumer behavior. Front. Psychol. 2017, 8, 1256. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kim, S.; Kandampully, J.; Bilgihan, A. The influence of eWOM communications: An application of online social network framework. Comput. Hum. Behav. 2018, 80, 243–254. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Teng, S.; Khong, K.W.; Chong, A.Y.L.; Lin, B. Persuasive electronic word-of-mouth messages in social media. J. Comput. Inf. Syst. 2017, 57, 76–88. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yan, Q.; Wu, S.; Wang, L.; Wu, P.; Chen, H.; Wei, G. E-WOM from e-commerce websites and social media: Which will consumers adopt? Electron. Commer. Res. Appl. 2016, 17, 62–73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ladhari, R.; Michaud, M. eWOM effects on hotel booking intentions, attitudes, trust, and website perceptions. Int. J. Hosp. Manag. 2015, 46, 36–45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Luo, Q.; Zhong, D. Using social network analysis to explain communication characteristics of travel-related electronic word-of-mouth on social networking sites. Tour. Manag. 2015, 46, 274–282. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kini, R. Social media and negative eWOM, and impact–current research and implications. In Proceedings of the 2nd European Conference on Social Media 2015 (ECSM 2015); Academic Conferences Limited: Porto, Portugal, 2015. [Google Scholar]
- Cheung, C.M.; Xiao, B.S.; Liu, I.L. Do actions speak louder than voices? The signaling role of social information cues in influencing consumer purchase decisions. Decis. Support Syst. 2014, 65, 50–58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Munar, A.M.; Jacobsen, J.K.S. Motivations for sharing tourism experiences through social media. Tour. Manag. 2014, 43, 46–54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Teng, S.; Wei Khong, K.; Wei Goh, W.; Yee Loong Chong, A. Examining the antecedents of persuasive eWOM messages in social media. Online Inf. Rev. 2014, 38, 746–768. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Arenas-Márquez, F.J.; Martínez-Torres, M.R.; Toral, S.L. Electronic word-of-mouth communities from the perspective of social network analysis. Technol. Anal. Strateg. Manag. 2014, 26, 927–942. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sotiriadis, M.D.; Van Zyl, C. Electronic word-of-mouth and online reviews in tourism services: The use of twitter by tourists. Electron. Commer. Res. 2013, 13, 103–124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, Z.; Kim, H.M. Factor analysis of word-of-mouth information acceptance about international tourism service through social media. Int. Commer. Inf. Rev. 2013, 15, 391–418. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tham, A.; Croy, G.; Mair, J. Social media in destination choice: Distinctive electronic word-of-mouth dimensions. J. Travel Tour. Mark. 2013, 30, 144–155. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Price, D.J. Little Science, Big Science; Columbia University Press: New York, NY, USA, 1963. [Google Scholar]
- Kullenberg, C.; Kasperowski, D. What is citizen science? A scientometric meta-analysis. PLoS ONE 2016, 11, e0147152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Vermeulen, I.E.; Seegers, D. Tried and tested: The impact of online hotel reviews on consumer consideration. Tour. Manag. 2009, 30, 123–127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Xie, H.J.; Miao, L.; Kuo, P.J.; Lee, B.Y. Consumers’ responses to ambivalent online hotel reviews: The role of perceived source credibility and pre-decisional. Int. J. Hosp. Manag. 2011, 30, 178–183. [Google Scholar]
Hotel Information Sources | Men | Women |
---|---|---|
Metasearch websites (e.g., Expedia, Priceline, Kayak) | 40% | 44% |
Hotel reviews posted on TripAdvisor, Facebook, Twitter, Blogs, etc. | 28% | 37% |
Hotel reviews provided by professionals, Forbes Travel Guide, etc. | 31% | 31% |
Colleagues and business associates recommendation | 15% | 12% |
Friends and family recommendation | 49% | 58% |
Travel—related websites | 43% | 41% |
Google, Yahoo, Bing, or other search engine | 48% | 47% |
Hotel recommended by my organization | 12% | 9% |
Hotel Information Sources | N of Respondents |
---|---|
TripAdvisor | 590 |
300 | |
Brand Website | 1050 |
Online Travel Agency | 1100 |
Online Metasearch Engines | 650 |
Online Search Engines | 1625 |
Read a travel book | 950 |
Online Booking Websites | 5 Weeks + | 4 Weeks | 3 Weeks | 2 Weeks | 1 Week | Same Day |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TripAdvisor | 16% | 10% | 11% | 11% | 28% | 24% |
Booking.com | 13% | 12% | 8% | 15% | 23% | 29% |
Expedia | 11% | 9% | 16% | 11% | 34% | 20% |
Choice Hotels | 10% | 9% | 11% | 17% | 12% | 40% |
Hilton | 10% | 5% | 3% | 8% | 26% | 48% |
Study | Description |
---|---|
[12] | A study of 262 subjects to establish relationships between the probability of making suggestions and eWOM based on the five big personality dimensions: extraversion, agreeableness, conscientiousness, neuroticism, and openness. |
[35] | A study of 793 respondents proposes an integrative model of three social network constructs associated with the website (i.e., tie strength, homophily, and source credibility) and their relationship to consumers’ evaluations associated with attitudes and perceived influence of eWOM strategies effectiveness. |
[36] | As little is known about the validity and applicability of cultural orientations in countries with perceived inherent similar values, this study identifies the critical factors that influence Chinese and Malaysian users’ attitudes and behavior when processing persuasive eWOM messages. |
[37] | This study analyzes the adoption process of consumers when EC-eWOM and SM-eWOM are presented simultaneously. A conceptual model is proposed to reveal the relationship between the adoption of the two types of eWOM. |
[38] | The study focuses on the influence of comments written by Facebook friends on the intentions of booking a hotel, the trust in the hotel, the attitude towards the hotel, and the perception of its website. The study also examines the moderator role of Internet users’ trust in those comments on these relations. |
[39] | Considering eWOM communication on SNSs as a network based on the users’ social relationships, this study applies social network analysis to examine the communication characteristics of travel-related eWOM on SNSs from the perspective of both ego and whole networks. |
[40] | This study focuses on existing frameworks and models to study negative eWOM in leading social networks and its impact on brands, products, and services. |
[41] | This study empirically examines how the two social information cues frequently found on online social communities—namely, action-based social information and opinion-based social information—influence consumer purchase decisions. It also explains the moderating role of consumer characteristics, consumer engagement, and consumer expertise. |
[42] | The study is based on a destination-specific survey and explores summer holidaymakers’ motivations for social media contributions and their willingness to share content through various social media. The findings in relation to the destination of Mallorca offer an understanding of the adoption of tourist social media in technologically-advanced markets with high levels of ICE use. |
[43] | As few studies have directly tested potential antecedents of persuasive eWOM messages among message recipients in a social media context, this study critically examines the determinants of persuasive eWOM messages when message recipients intend to accept and use eWOM messages. |
[44] | Influencers can have an important impact on the decision-making of other users. Therefore, the popular eWOM community, Ciao.com, has been modeled as a social network. Using social network analysis techniques, the existence of influencers is justified by the power law distribution of user participation, and then they are identified using their topological features within the social network. |
[45] | By developing a conceptual framework for understanding the foundations of digital communication, this study empirically investigates the validity of this framework by examining the factors influencing tourism consumer behavior. The study adopts a conceptual model of eWOM and explores the use of Twitter by tourists. |
[46] | This paper examines the acceptance of word-of-mouth information dissemination through social media. The specific focus is on the determinants of acceptance and the effect of acceptance on purchase intention as the result of information on social media pertaining to overseas tourism. |
[47] | This conceptual article advances an understanding of electronic word-of-mouth in presenting distinctive credibility profiles towards a proposed influence on destination image and choice. |
Dependent Variable | Independent Variable | Sample | Key Findings | Topic | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
[12] | Personality traits | eWOM drivers | 262 | Some personality traits influence eWOM, but not to a large extent. | Influence of personality traits on eWOM |
[35] | Tie strength, Homophily, Credibility | Attitude towards eWOM, perceived influence, purchase behavior | 793 | Lack of social presence, increasing skepticism about eWOM credibility. Social relationships between consumers and websites. | Attitudes and influence of eWOM for purchase |
[36] | Cultural background | Attitudes and Intention | - | Facebook is the most used SNS in Malaysia, as is QQ in China Attitudes and intentions vary | Cultural differences between Malaysian and Chinese eWOM |
[37] | EC Volume, EC Rate extremism, EC Integrity, EC Source credibility, Cognitive level, Involvement | Electronic Commerce eWOM usefulness, EC eWOM credibility, EC eWOM adoption, SM eWOM adoption | 289 | EC-eWOM’s usefulness and credibility positively influence EC-eWOM, but negatively SM-eWOM. EC-eWOM adoption negatively impacts SM-eWOM adoption | Relationships and influence between eWOM adoption in eCommerce and social media |
[38] | Facebook eWOM, Positive eWOM, Negative eWOM | Attitude toward hotel, Booking intentions | 800 | The existence of an influence of Facebook eWOM on user friends and the moderator role of the trust in the decision-making process for hotel booking. | eWOM in Social media and its influence on the user decision-making process |
[39] | Contact frequency, Contact duration, Intimacy, Mutual confiding, Social ties, Travel behavior, Ego-network analysis | Whole-network analysis, Density, Graph centralization, Centrality, Subgroups | 289 | Travel-related eWOM communication via SNS relies on existing social relationships. The effect of transmitted information is stronger than that of influential decision making | Ego and Whole network analysis |
[40] | Negative Traditional WOM, Negative eWOM | Strategies, Product categories, Service categories, Company brand | 39 | Social media influence consumer decision-making process. Impact of negative eWOM on product, strategies, and ROI. | Influence of negative eWOM |
[41] | Peer consumer purchase, Peer consumer review, Engagement, Expertise | Consumer Purchase Decision | 897 | Social information cues influence consumer purchase decisions. Action-based information is more influential than opinion-based information. | Social media credibility |
[42] | Media, Types of content | Motivations for sharing | 398 | Dominance of visual content. Relevance of altruistic and community-related motivations. Motivational differences among types of content creators | Social media and Tourist motivations for sharing content |
[43] | Persuasive eWOM messages, Information acceptance, Intention to use | Argument quality, Source credibility, Source attractiveness, Source perception, Source style | 78 | Argument quality, source credibility, attractiveness perception, and style are key antecedents of persuasive eWOM. | Antecedents of persuasive eWOM |
[44] | Number of reviews, Variety of performed reviews, Position in consumer network | Influencer detection | - | Influencers are not determined by the number of performed reviews, but by the variety or scope of their performed reviews and their central position in the consumer network | Social Network Analysis Technique |
[45] | Sources of eWOM, Mediating factors, Influencing variables | Outcomes of eWOM and online reviews | 500 | Twitter is not a panacea, but another marketing channel to be integrated within marketing communications | eWOM and online reviews |
[46] | Determinants of acceptance, eWOM acceptance | Purchase intention | 1222 | Acceptance of eWOM has a significant effect on the spread of eWOM and customer purchase intention. Practicability and professionalism of eWOM should be improved. | eWOM acceptance and dissemination |
[47] | Source-receiver relationships, Channel variety, Information solicitation, Message retention, Provider motivations | Destination choice | - | Distinctive credibility profiles towards a proposed influence on destination image and choice | eWOM Dimensions |
TripAdvisor | Website | SNS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
[12] | - | - | - | - | √ |
[35] | - | - | - | - | √ |
[36] | - | - | - | - | √ |
[37] | - | - | - | √ | √ |
[38] | √ | - | - | √ | √ |
[39] | - | - | - | - | √ |
[40] | - | - | - | √ | √ |
[41] | - | - | - | √ | √ |
[42] | - | - | - | - | √ |
[43] | - | - | - | - | √ |
[44] | - | - | - | - | √ |
[45] | - | - | √ | - | - |
[46] | - | - | - | - | √ |
[47] | - | - | - | - | √ |
Journal | Total of Findings | Quartile | Category |
---|---|---|---|
Psihologija | 1 | Q4 | Psychology, Multidisciplinary |
Computers in Human Behavior | 1 | Q1 | Psychology, Experimental |
Journal of Computer Information Systems | 1 | Q3 | Computer Science, Information Systems |
Electronic Commerce Research and Applications | 1 | Q2 | Business, Computer Science, Information Systems, Interdisciplinary Applications |
International Journal of Hospitality Management | 1 | Q1 | Hospitality, Leisure, Sport, and Tourism |
Tourism Management | 2 | Q1 | Environmental Studies, Hospitality, Leisure, Sport, and Tourism Management |
2nd European Conference on Social Media (ECSM) | 1 | - | Communication, Social Sciences |
Decision Support Systems | 1 | Q1 | Computer Science; AI Operations Research and Management Science |
Journal of Computer Information Systems | 1 | Q3 | Computer Science, Information Systems |
Technology Analysis and Strategic Management | 1 | Q3 | Management |
International Journal of Information Management | 1 | Q1 | Information Science and Library Science |
Electronic Commerce Research | 1 | Q3 | Business and Management |
Journal of Travel and Tourism Marketing | 1 | Q3 | Hospitality, Leisure, Sport, and Tourism |
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. |
© 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Reyes-Menendez, A.; Correia, M.B.; Matos, N.; Adap, C. Understanding Online Consumer Behavior and eWOM Strategies for Sustainable Business Management in the Tourism Industry. Sustainability 2020, 12, 8972. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12218972
Reyes-Menendez A, Correia MB, Matos N, Adap C. Understanding Online Consumer Behavior and eWOM Strategies for Sustainable Business Management in the Tourism Industry. Sustainability. 2020; 12(21):8972. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12218972
Chicago/Turabian StyleReyes-Menendez, Ana, Marisol B. Correia, Nelson Matos, and Charlene Adap. 2020. "Understanding Online Consumer Behavior and eWOM Strategies for Sustainable Business Management in the Tourism Industry" Sustainability 12, no. 21: 8972. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12218972
APA StyleReyes-Menendez, A., Correia, M. B., Matos, N., & Adap, C. (2020). Understanding Online Consumer Behavior and eWOM Strategies for Sustainable Business Management in the Tourism Industry. Sustainability, 12(21), 8972. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12218972