Ecopreneurial Education and Support: Developing the Innovators of Today and Tomorrow
Abstract
:1. Introduction
2. Literature Review
“Ecopreneurship is characterized by some fundamental aspects of entrepreneurial activities that are oriented less towards management systems or technical procedures and focused more on the personal initiative and skills of the entrepreneurial person or team to realise market success with environmental innovations.”Ecopreneurs therefore often embed personal mission, beliefs and drivers in their business activities e.g., to reduce food loss and food waste, packaging use, improve animal welfare or reduce the ecological footprint of food production. This ethos mirrors that of the family farmer where often personal self-identity and business identity coalesce.”[46]
3. Materials and Methods
Theoretical and Conceptual Underpinnings and Frameworks for Action
4. Results and analysis
4.1. Course Offering
4.2. Royal Agricultural University (RAU): Case Study
“We pride ourselves on creating the knowledge and industry connections which stem from our rich heritage with an innovative, forward thinking and enterprising approach. It is our proven combination which continues to open doors for our students. RAU graduates have prepared for successful careers in their chosen field whether that be leading innovation and change in industry, informing future land-based policy or setting up their own businesses; which many of our entrepreneurial students do with great success.”
“We place a strong emphasis on entrepreneurialism, creating opportunities for our students to develop their own business ideas and receive tailored support. From student societies to workshops and awards budding entrepreneurs can benefit from the knowledge and experience of their lecturers and strong industry ties.”
- Immersive & diverse innovation ecosystem: There is an intentionally broad ecosystem within the Farm491 membership (https://farm491.com/type/current/) ranging from small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) to large industry players. This environment empowers entrepreneurs to understand the needs of industry to ensure the product being developed actually solves a problem or delivers economic, environmental value that industry is prepared to pay for. The current active membership is 70 companies, and students at the RAU have the opportunity to interact with, and learn from, these businesses. Farm491 utilizes thought leadership discussion and showcase events to bring together this diverse ecosystem around key and emergent topics.
- Non-time-based graduation process: The “valley of death” from ideation to commercialization within a complex industry like the agri-food industry is very wide. Farm491 has develop a “long-tail” support network that includes physical spaces, from hot-desking to large offices to industrial workshops, enabling Farm491 to offer spaces appropriate for the stage of the company and different levels of support depending on the stage of the business.
- Influencing Funders: Farm491 provides informal and formal advice to funding bodies (public, philanthropic and investment) to help align their diligence process and understanding of the innovation landscape with the needs of entrepreneurs. The embedding of advanced agri-technology in the Gloucestershire draft Local Industrial Strategy [115] is a result of such activity. Engagement with policy makers and funders helps break down the barriers to investment in a nascent sector such as agri-technology. As a result, Farm491 has helped entrepreneurs raise over £31 million in funding since 2018.
- Enabling merging of innovation: Farm491 takes an active role of connecting different entrepreneurs together, encouraging collaboration to drive fewer but more commercially focused ideas forward at scale.
5. Discussion
6. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Vergragt, P.J.; Dendler, L.; De Jong, M.; Matus, K. Transitions to sustainable consumption and production in cities. J. Clean. Prod. 2016, 134, 1–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Riekhof, M.-C.; Regnier, E.; Quaas, M.F. Economic growth, international trade, and the depletion or conservation of renewable natural resources. J. Environ. Econ. Manag. 2019, 97, 116–133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jaca, C.; Prieto-Sandoval, V.; Psomas, E.L.; Ormazabal, M. What should consumer organizations do to drive environmental sustainability? J. Clean. Prod. 2018, 181, 201–208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- WCED. Report of the World Commission on Environment and Development: Our Common Future Acronyms and Note on Terminology Chairman’s Foreword; Oxford University Press: Oxford, NY, USA, 1987. [Google Scholar]
- Grin, J.; Rotmans, J.; Schot, J. Transitions to Sustainable Development: New Directions in the Study of Long Term Transformative Change; Routledge: Abington, UK, 2010. [Google Scholar]
- Markard, J.; Raven, R.R.; Truffer, B. Sustainability transitions: An emerging field of research and its prospects. Res. Policy 2012, 41, 955–967. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rauschmayer, F.; Bauler, T.; Schäpke, N.N. Towards a thick understanding of sustainability transitions—Linking transition management, capabilities and social practices. Ecol. Econ. 2015, 109, 211–221. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Isaak, R. Green logic: Ecopreneurship, Theory and Ethics; Greenleaf Publishing: Sheffield, UK, 1998. [Google Scholar]
- Hultman, M.; Nordlund, C. Energizing technology: Expectations of fuel cells and the hydrogen economy, 1990–2005. Hist. Technol. 2013, 29, 33–53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Antolin-Lopez, R.; Martiínez-del-Rio, J.; Céspedes-Lorente, J.J. Environmental entrepreneurship: A review of the current conversation after two decades of research. In Proceedings of the 2014 GRONEN Conference, Helsinki, Finland, 16–18 June 2014. [Google Scholar]
- Schaltegger, S. A Framework for Ecopreneurship. Greener Manag. Int. 2002, 2002, 45–58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Galkina, T.; Hultman, M. Ecopreneurship—Assessing the field and outlining the research potential. Small Enterp. Res. 2016, 23, 58–72. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rodríguez-García, M.; García, M.G.; Carrilero-Castillo, A. An Overview of Ecopreneurship, Eco-Innovation, and the Ecological Sector. Sustainability 2019, 11, 2909. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Auerswald, P.E.; Branscomb, L.M. Valleys of Death and Darwinian Seas: Financing the Invention to Innovation Transition in the United States. J. Technol. Transf. 2003, 28, 227–239. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Son, H.; Chung, Y.; Yoon, S. How can university technology holding companies bridge the Valley of Death? Evidence from Korea. Technovation 2020, 102158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Barr, S.H.; Baker, T.; Markham, S.K.; Kingon, A.I. Bridging the Valley of Death: Lessons Learned From 14 Years of Commercialization of Technology Education. Acad. Manag. Learn. Educ. 2009, 8, 370–388. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ellwood, P.; Williams, C.; Egan, J. Crossing the valley of death: Five underlying innovation processes. Technovation 2020, 102162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ratinho, T.; Henriques, E. The role of science parks and business incubators in converging countries: Evidence from Portugal. Technovation 2010, 30, 278–290. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bergek, A.; Norrman, C. Incubator best practice: A framework. Technovation 2008, 28, 20–28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Biemans, W.G.; Huizingh, K.R.E. Rethinking the Valley of Death; an Ecosystem Perspective on the Commercialisation of New Technologies. Technovation 2020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Carter, S. The indigenous rural enterprise characteristics and change in the British farm sector. Entrep. Reg. Dev. 1996, 8, 345–358. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Carter, S. Portfolio entrepreneurship in the farm sector: Indigenous growth in rural areas? Entrep. Reg. Dev. 1998, 10, 17–32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Carter, S. Multiple business ownership in the farm sector: Assessing the enterprise and employment contributions of farmers in Cambridgeshire. J. Rural. Stud. 1999, 15, 417–429. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Carter, S.L. Entrepreneurship in the farm sector: Indigenous growth for rural areas. In Entrepreneurship in Regional Food Production; Norland Research Institute: Bodo, Norway, 2003; pp. 23–50. [Google Scholar]
- Carter, S.; Rosa, P. Indigenous Rural Firms: Farm Enterprises in the UK. Int. Small Bus. J.: Res. Entrep. 1998, 16, 15–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sharma, M.C.; Tiwari, R.; Sharma, J.P. Entrepreneurship in Livestock and Agriculture; CBS Publishing: New Dehli, India, 2010. [Google Scholar]
- Alsos, G.; Welter, F.; Carter, S.; Ljunggren, E. The Handbook of Research on Entrepreneurship in Agriculture and Rural Development; Edward Elgar Publishing: Cheltenham, UK, 2011. [Google Scholar]
- Fitz-Koch, S.; Nordqvist, M.; Carter, S.; Hunter, E. Entrepreneurship in the Agricultural Sector: A Literature Review and Future Research Opportunities. Entrep. Theory Pr. 2017, 42, 129–166. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Lans, T.; Van Galen, M.; Verstegen, J.; Biemans, H.; Mulder, M. Searching for entrepreneurs among small business ownermanagers in agriculture. NJAS—Wageningen. J. Life Sci. 2014, 68, 41–51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Lans, T.; Seuneke, P.; Klerkx, L. Agricultural Entrepreneurship. In Encyclopedia of Creativity, Invention, Innovation and Entrepreneurship; Carayannis, E.G., Ed.; Springer: New York, USA, 2017; pp. 1–7. [Google Scholar]
- Dias, C.S.; Rodrigues, R.G.; Ferreira, J.J. What’s new in the research on agricultural entrepreneurship? J. Rural. Stud. 2019, 65, 99–115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Omodanisi, E.O.; Egwakhe, A.J.; Ajike, O.E. Smart Agri-Preneurship Dimensions and Food Affordability. Glob. J. Manag. Bus. Res. 2020, 20, 1–9. Available online: https://journalofbusiness.org/index.php/GJMBR/article/view/3053/2954 (accessed on 12 September 2020).
- McElwee, G. Farmers as entrepreneurs: Developing competitive skills. J. Dev. Entrep. 2006, 11, 187–206. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- McElwee, G. A taxonomy of entrepreneurial farmers. Int. J. Entrep. Small Bus. 2008, 6, 465–478. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Foster, A.D.; Rosenzweig, M.R. Learning by Doing and Learning from Others: Human Capital and Technical Change in Agriculture. J. Politi -Econ. 1995, 103, 1176–1209. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lave, J.; Wenger, E. Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK, 1991. [Google Scholar]
- Gasson, R. Educational qualifications of UK farmers: A review. J. Rural. Stud. 1998, 14, 487–498. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Somerville, P.; Smith, R.; McElwee, G. The dark side of the rural idyll: Stories of illegal/illicit economic activity in the UK countryside. J. Rural. Stud. 2015, 39, 219–228. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Pato, M.L.; Teixeira, A.A. Twenty Years of Rural Entrepreneurship: A Bibliometric Survey. Sociol. Rural. 2014, 56, 3–28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Müller, S.; Korsgaard, S. Resources and bridging: The role of spatial context in rural entrepreneurship. Entrep. Reg. Dev. 2017, 30, 224–255. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gaddefors, J.; Anderson, A. Romancing the rural: Reconceptualizing rural entrepreneurship as engagement with context(s). Int. J. Entrep. Innov. 2018, 20, 159–169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Muñoz, P.; Kimmitt, J. Rural entrepreneurship in place: An integrated framework. Entrep. Reg. Dev. 2019, 31, 842–873. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sá, E.; Casais, B.; Silva, J. Local development through rural entrepreneurship, from the Triple Helix perspective. Int. J. Entrep. Behav. Res. 2019, 25, 698–716. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sequeira, R.R. Factors Affecting Rural Entrepreneurship. Int. J. Res. Eng. Sci. Manag. 2020, 3, 239–240. Available online: https://www.journals.resaim.com/ijresm/article/view/168 (accessed on 25 September 2020).
- Bosworth, G.; McElwee, G.; Smith, R. Rural enterprise in Mexico: A case of necessity diversification. J. Enterp. Commun. People Places Glob. Econ. 2015, 9, 327–343. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Morris, W.; Henley, A.; Dowell, D. Farm diversification, entrepreneurship and technology adoption: Analysis of upland farmers in Wales. J. Rural. Stud. 2017, 53, 132–143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Calza, F.; Go, F.; Parmentola, A.; Trunfio, M. European rural entrepreneur and tourism-based diversification: Does national culture matter? Int. J. Tour. Res. 2018, 20, 671–683. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- De Rosa, M.; McElwee, G.; Smith, R. Farm diversification strategies in response to rural policy: A case from rural Italy. Land Use Policy 2019, 81, 291–301. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Moumenihelali, H.; Sadighi, H.; Chizari, M.; Abbasi, E. Pluriactivity: An Entrepreneurial Strategy for Smallholder Farmers. J. Entrep. Agric. 2020, 6, 112–124. Available online: http://jea.sanru.ac.ir/article-1-204-en.html (accessed on 25 September 2020).
- De Silva, L.R.; Kodithuwakku, S.S. Pluriactivity, entrepreneurship and socio-economic success of farming households. In The Handbook of Research on Entrepreneurship in Agriculture and Rural Development; Alsos, G.A., Carter, S., Ljunggren, E., Eds.; Edward Elgar: Cheltenham, UK, 2011. [Google Scholar]
- Alsos, G.A.; Ljunggren, E.; Pettersen, L.T. Farm-based entrepreneurs: What triggers the start-up of new business activities? J. Small Bus. Enterp. Dev. 2003, 10, 435–443. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rønning, L.; Kolvereid, L. Income Diversification in Norwegian Farm Households. Int. Small Bus. J. Res. Entrep. 2006, 24, 405–420. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Alsos, G.A.; Carter, S.; Ljunggren, E. Kinship and business: How entrepreneurial households facilitate business growth. Entrep. Reg. Dev. 2014, 26, 97–122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Van Der Ploeg, J.D.; Roep, D. Multifunctionality and rural development the actual situation in Europe. In Multifunctional Agriculture. A New Paradigm for European Agriculture and Rural Development; Van Huylenbroeck, G., Durand, G., Eds.; Ashgate: Aldershot, UK, 2003; pp. 37–54. [Google Scholar]
- Meraner, M.; Heijman, W.; Kuhlman, T.; Finger, R. Determinants of farm diversification in the Netherlands. Land Use Policy 2015, 42, 767–780. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Björklund, J.; Limburg, E.K.; Rydberg, T. Impact of production intensity on the ability of the agricultural landscape to generate ecosystem services: An example from Sweden. Ecol. Econ. 1999, 29, 269–291. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- De Roest, K.; Ferrari, P.; Knickel, K. Specialisation and economies of scale or diversification and economies of scope? Assessing different agricultural development pathways. J. Rural. Stud. 2018, 59, 222–231. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Godfray, H.C.J.; Garnett, T. Food security and sustainable intensification. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B: Biol. Sci. 2014, 369, 20120273. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rockström, J.; Williams, J.; Daily, G.; Noble, A.; Matthews, N.; Gordon, L.; Wetterstrand, H.; Declerck, F.; Shah, M.; Steduto, P.; et al. Sustainable intensification of agriculture for human prosperity and global sustainability. Ambio 2017, 46, 4–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Pretty, J.; Benton, T.G.; Bharucha, Z.P.; Dicks, L.V.; Flora, C.B.; Godfray, H.C.J.; Goulson, D.; Hartley, S.; Lampkin, N.; Morris, C.; et al. Global assessment of agricultural system redesign for sustainable intensification. Nat. Sustain. 2018, 1, 441–446. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Scherer, L.; Verburg, P.; Schulp, C. Opportunities for sustainable intensification in European agriculture. Glob. Environ. Chang. 2018, 48, 43–55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jaskiewicz, P.; Combs, J.G.; Rau, S.B. Entrepreneurial legacy: Toward a theory of how some family firms nurture transgenerational entrepreneurship. J. Bus. Ventur. 2015, 30, 29–49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Barbera, F.; Stamm, I.; DeWitt, R.-L. The Development of an Entrepreneurial Legacy: Exploring the Role of Anticipated Futures in Transgenerational Entrepreneurship. Fam. Bus. Rev. 2018, 31, 352–378. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Clinton, E.; McAdam, M.; Gamble, J.R.; Brophy, M. Entrepreneurial learning: The transmitting and embedding of entrepreneurial behaviours within the transgenerational entrepreneurial family. Entrep. Reg. Dev. 2020, 1–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cruz, A.D.; Hamilton, E.; Jack, S.L. Understanding entrepreneurial opportunities through metaphors: A narrative approach to theorizing family entrepreneurship. Entrep. Reg. Dev. 2020, 1–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mathias, B.D.; Williams, D.W.; Smith, A.R. Entrepreneurial inception: The role of imprinting in entrepreneurial action. J. Bus. Ventur. 2015, 30, 11–28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Manning, L. Enabling entrepreneurial behaviour in a land-based university. Educ. Train. 2018, 60, 735–748. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Suddaby, R.; Bruton, G.D.; Si, S.X. Entrepreneurship through a qualitative lens: Insights on the construction and/or discovery of entrepreneurial opportunity. J. Bus. Ventur. 2015, 30, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Manning, L.; Parrott, P. The impact of workplace placement on students’ entrepreneurial attitude. High. Educ. Ski. Work. Learn. 2018, 8, 56–69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mat, S.C.; Maat, S.M.; Mohd, N. Identifying Factors that Affecting the Entrepreneurial Intention among Engineering Technology Students. Procedia -Soc. Behav. Sci. 2015, 211, 1016–1022. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Ambad, S.N.A.; Damit, D.H.D.A. Determinants of Entrepreneurial Intention Among Undergraduate Students in Malaysia. Procedia Econ. Financ. 2016, 37, 108–114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Tracey, P.; Phillips, N.; Jarvis, O. Bridging Institutional Entrepreneurship and the Creation of New Organizational Forms: A Multilevel Model. Organ. Sci. 2011, 22, 60–80. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Korsgaard, S.; Müller, S.; Tanvig, H.W. Rural entrepreneurship or entrepreneurship in the rural—Between place and space. Int. J. Entrep. Behav. Res. 2015, 21, 5–26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Barth, F. Economic Spheres in Darfur. In Themes in Economic Anthropology; Firth, R., Ed.; Routledge: London, UK, 1967. [Google Scholar]
- Singer, A.E. Reflections on Eco-Preneurship. 2012. Available online: File:///C:/Users/rober/AppData/Local/Packages/Microsoft.MicrosoftEdge_8wekyb3d8bbwe/TempState/Downloads/31834%20(2).pdf (accessed on 1 October 2020).
- Hugo, A.; Barane, J.; Clemetsen, M.; Reed, S. Eco-preneurship: The Aesthetics of Place Based Education. 2014. Available online: https://naturpedagog.no/wp-content/uploads/2014/07/ECOPRENEURSHIP-study-report-.pdf (accessed on 1 October 2020).
- Rezaei, B.; Naderi, N.; Rostami, S. Strategic analysis of green entrepreneurship development in agriculture (case study: Kermanshah county). Iran. Agric. Ext. Educ. J. 2018, 14, 37–50. Available online: https://www.cabdirect.org/cabdirect/abstract/20193131748 (accessed on 20 September 2020).
- Sher, A.; Mazhar, S.; Zulfiqar, F.; Wang, D.; Li, X.; Li, X. Green entrepreneurial farming: A dream or reality? J. Clean. Prod. 2019, 220, 1131–1142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- McClintock, N.C. Regenerative agricultural entrepreneurship and education along the Petite Cote, Senegal. LEISA Mag. 2006, 22, 26–27. Available online: https://edepot.wur.nl/96591 (accessed on 20 September 2020).
- Ratten, V.; Dana, L.-P. Sustainable Entrepreneurship, Family Farms and the Dairy Industry. Int. J. Soc. Ecol. Sustain. Dev. 2017, 8, 114–129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Conley, G.; Smith, R.; Smith, A.; McElwee, G. Researching the influence of dyslexia on entrepreneurial propensity in the farming community: A preliminary study. In Proceedings of the Rural Entrepreneurship Conference, Islay, Scotland, 18–19 June 2015. [Google Scholar]
- Karari, R.; Munyua, M. Entrepreneurship Education and Eco-Preneurship Innovation as Change Agents for Environmental Problems. 2018. Available online: http://ir.mksu.ac.ke/handle/123456780/758 (accessed on 1 September 2020).
- Smith, R.; Conley, G.; Manning, L. Documenting the role of UK Agricultural Colleges in propagating the ‘farming-dyslexia-entrepreneurship nexus’. In Entrepreneurship, Dyslexia and Education; Pavey, B., Alexander-Passe, N., Meehan, M., Eds.; Routledge: Abingdon, UK, 2020. [Google Scholar]
- Logan, J. Analysis of the incidence of dyslexia in entrepreneurs and its implications. In Proceedings of the United States Association for Small Business and Entrepreneurship, San Antonio, TX, USA, 10–13 January 2008; p. 636. [Google Scholar]
- Hewes, D.G. Dyslexia Association of Singapore Entrepreneurs with Dyslexia in Singapore: The Incidence, Their Educational Experiences, and Their Unique Attributes. Asia Pac. J. Dev. Differ. 2020, 7, 157–198. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hessels, J.; Rietveld, C.A.; Van Der Zwan, P. Unraveling two myths about entrepreneurs. Econ. Lett. 2014, 122, 435–438. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lundberg, I.; Nilsson, L.-G. What church examination records can tell us about the inheritance of reading disability. Ann. Dyslexia 1986, 36, 215–236. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Richardson, J.T.E. The academic attainment of students with disabilities in UK higher education. Stud. High. Educ. 2009, 34, 123–137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Webster, D.M. Listening to the Voice of Dyslexic Students at a Small, Vocational Higher Education Institution to Promote Successful Inclusive Practice in the 21st C. Int. J. Learn. Teach. 2016, 2, 78–86. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Harden, R. What is a spiral curriculum? Med. Teach. 1999, 21, 141–143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Manning, L.; de Kluwe Aguiar, L. Embedding sustainable development in the curricula—Learning about sustainable development as a means to develop self-awareness. In Integrating Sustainable Development into Curriculum; Sengupta, E., Blessinger, P., Eds.; Emerald Publishing Ltd.: Bingley, UK, 2020. [Google Scholar]
- Eickhoff, M.T. Entrepreneurial Thinking and Action—An Educational Responsibility for Europe. Eur. J. vocat. Train. 2008, 45, 5–31. Available online: https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ836654 (accessed on 21 September 2020).
- Pittaway, L.A.; Gazzard, J.; Shore, A.; Williamson, T. Student clubs: Experiences in entrepreneurial learning. Entrep. Reg. Dev. 2015, 27, 127–153. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Hossain, M.; Leminen, S.; Westerlund, M. A systematic review of living lab literature. J. Clean. Prod. 2019, 213, 976–988. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jucevicius, G.; Juceviciene, R.; Gaidelys, V.; Kalman, A. The Emerging Innovation Ecosystems and "Valley of Death": Towards the Combination of Entrepreneurial and Institutional Approaches. Eng. Econ. 2016, 27, 430–438. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Heilman, K.M.; Nadeau, S.E.; Beversdorf, D.Q. Creative Innovation: Possible Brain Mechanisms. Neurocase 2003, 9, 369–379. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Smith, R. Reviewing Entrepreneurship Education in the UK Agricultural College Sector: An Exploratory Study. In Proceedings of the Rural Entrepreneurship Conference, Dumfries, UK, 24–26 June 2010. [Google Scholar]
- Smith, R.; Manning, L.; Conley, J. Integrating Entrepreneurship into the curriculum in UK Agricultural Universities. In Proceedings of the Rural Entrepreneurship Conference, Inverness, UK, 17–19 June 2019. [Google Scholar]
- Scott, J. A Matter of Record: Documentary Sources in Social Research; John Wiley: London, UK, 2014. [Google Scholar]
- Kozinets, R.V. Netnography: Doing Ethnographic Research Online; Sage: London, UK, 2010. [Google Scholar]
- Yin, R.K. Case Study Research: Design and Methods; Sage: London, UK, 2013. [Google Scholar]
- The Royal Agricultural University Website. Available online: https://www.rau.ac.uk (accessed on 20 September 2020).
- Enterprise and Entrepreneurship. The Royal Agricultural University Website. Available online: https://www.rau.ac.uk/study/enterprise-entrepreneurship (accessed on 20 September 2020).
- Farm491 Website. Available online: https://farm491.com (accessed on 20 September 2020).
- Deakins, D.; Bensemann, J. Entrepreneurial learning and innovation: Qualitative evidence from agri-business technology-based small firms in New Zealand. Int. J. Innov. Learn. 2018, 23, 318–338. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Ulvenblad, P.; Barth, H.; Ulvenblad, P.-O.; Ståhl, J.; Björklund, J.C. Overcoming barriers in agri-business development: Two education programs for entrepreneurs in the Swedish agricultural sector. J. Agric. Educ. Ext. 2020, 26, 443–464. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Harkonen, J.; Haapasalo, H.; Hanninen, K. Productisation: A Literature Review. In Diversity, Technology, and Innovation for Operational Competitiveness, Proceedings of the 2013 International Conference on Technology Innovation and Industrial Management, Phuket, Thailand, 29–31 May 2013; ToKnowPress: Celje, Slovenia, 2013; pp. 3–264. [Google Scholar]
- Hietala, J.; Kontio, J.; Jokinen, J.-P.; Pyysiainen, J. Challenges of software product companies: Results of a national survey in finland. In Proceedings of the 10th International Symposium on Software Metrics, Chicago, IL, USA, 11–17 September 2004; Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers: Chicago, IL, USA, 2004; pp. 232–243. [Google Scholar]
- Kinnunen, T.; Hänninen, K.; Haapasalo, H.; Vehkapera, H.K. Business case analysis in rapid productisation. Int. J. Rapid Manuf. 2014, 4, 14–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Valminen, K.; Toivonen, M. Seeking efficiency through productisation: A case study of small KIBS participating in a productisation project. Serv. Ind. J. 2012, 32, 273–289. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chattopadhyay, N. Productisation of Service: A Case Study. Int. J. Adv. Comput. Sci. Appl. 2012, 3, 209–213. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Kirkwood, J.; Walton, S. What motivates ecopreneurs to start businesses? Int. J. Entrep. Behav. Res. 2010, 16, 204–228. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pastakia, A. Grassroots ecopreneurs: Change agents for a sustainable society. J. Organ. Chang. Manag. 1998, 11, 157–173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Walton, S.; Kirkwood, J. Tempered radicals! Ecopreneurs as change agents for sustainability—An exploratory study. Int. J. Soc. Entrep. Innov. 2013, 2, 461–475. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- gFIRST Draft Gloucestershire Local Industrial Strategy 2019. Available online: https://www.gfirstlep.com/downloads/2020/gloucestershire_draft_local-industrial-strategy_2019-updated.pdf (accessed on 25 September 2020).
- Exley, S. The effectiveness of teaching strategies for students with dyslexia based on their preferred learning styles. Br. J. Spéc. Educ. 2004, 30, 213–220. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Attree, A.E.; Turner, M.J.; Cowell, N. A Virtual Reality Test Identifies the Visuospatial Strengths of Adolescents with Dyslexia. CyberPsychol. Behav. 2009, 12, 163–168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Brunswick, N.; Martin, G.N.; Marzano, L. Visuospatial superiority in developmental dyslexia: Myth or reality? Learn. Individ. Differ. 2010, 20, 421–426. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bacon, A.M.; Bennett, S. Dyslexia in Higher Education: The decision to study art. Eur. J. Spéc. Needs Educ. 2012, 28, 19–32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Etling, A.W.; Barbuto., J.E. Globalizing colleges of agriculture. In Proceedings of the 18th Annual Conference of the Association for International Agricultural and Extension Education, Durban, South Africa, 26–30 May 2002; Available online: http://www.aged.tamu.edu/aiaee (accessed on 15 September 2020).
- Mulder, M.; Küpper, H. The Future of Agricultural Education: The Case of the Netherlands. J. Agric. Educ. Ext. 2006, 12, 127–139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yaghoubi, J. Study barriers to entrepreneurship promotion in agriculture higher education. Procedia -Soc. Behav. Sci. 2010, 2, 1901–1905. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
Course | Number analyzed | Business Business Developments | Entrepreneurship/Enterprise | Innovation | Diversification | Information Systems Communication Technology | Agritech |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Agricultural science | 12 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Agriculture | 48 | 36 | 8 | 2 | 5 | 1 | 1 |
Agribusiness | 4 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 |
Farm business | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Agri-food | 3 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 |
Agricultural management | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Applied farm management | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 |
International business incl. agri-business | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Total | 71 | 46 | 13 | 3 | 5 | 4 | 1 |
Subject | Entrepreneurship/ Enterprise | Innovation | Diversification | Information Systems/Business Communication Technology | Agri-tech | Total |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Agriculture | ||||||
The Royal Agricultural University (RAU) | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
Duchy | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3 |
Applied Farm Management | ||||||
RAU | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
Learning Opportunities and Resources | Description |
---|---|
Workshops | These provide students with practical information needed to start their own business. |
Competitions | Such as the “Think it” challenge that allows students to submit a 2-min filmed business idea pitch to lecturers. Also, there is a “Dragons Den” style “Grand Ideas” business plan competition that provides winners with £1000 to invest in their own business idea as well as £2500 of in-kind support. |
External Mentors | This provides up to 12 h of individual support from staff and professionals. Mentors are paired with students to get the best fit between skills and sector experience. |
The First Steps Fund | Provides students, staff and recent alumni with proof of concept funding of up to £250 to help them test business ideas. |
Ask the expert | This initiative provides students with one-to-one opportunities to ask experts in their field about business problems. |
The Enterprise Society | This society includes social learning opportunities as well as organizing trips to local and rural entrepreneurial businesses. |
The social entrepreneurship projects | These include projects such as “Muddy Wellies,” “Cotswold Hills Honey,” and “Cotswold Hills Wine,” which provide real life business experience to students. |
John Oldacre Rural Innovation Centre | A £1 million endowment that provides students with transferable practical skills. |
The Alliston Centre | A £4.2 million endowment that provides students access to a regional business and agri-tech experience via an innovation hub. |
Farm491 | The university’s £3.2 million funded Inspiring Agri-tech Innovation (IAI) program providing students with a comprehensive range of business support to aspiring agri-tech entrepreneurs to develop, launch and grow their ventures into sustainable businesses. |
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. |
© 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Manning, L.; Smith, R.; Conley, G.; Halsey, L. Ecopreneurial Education and Support: Developing the Innovators of Today and Tomorrow. Sustainability 2020, 12, 9228. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12219228
Manning L, Smith R, Conley G, Halsey L. Ecopreneurial Education and Support: Developing the Innovators of Today and Tomorrow. Sustainability. 2020; 12(21):9228. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12219228
Chicago/Turabian StyleManning, Louise, Robert Smith, Gillian Conley, and Luke Halsey. 2020. "Ecopreneurial Education and Support: Developing the Innovators of Today and Tomorrow" Sustainability 12, no. 21: 9228. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12219228
APA StyleManning, L., Smith, R., Conley, G., & Halsey, L. (2020). Ecopreneurial Education and Support: Developing the Innovators of Today and Tomorrow. Sustainability, 12(21), 9228. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12219228