Next Article in Journal
Modeling of Compressive Strength of Sustainable Self-Compacting Concrete Incorporating Treated Palm Oil Fuel Ash Using Artificial Neural Network
Next Article in Special Issue
Identifying Unwanted Conditions through Chaotic Area Determination in the Context of Indonesia’s Economic Resilience at the City Level
Previous Article in Journal
Toward Sustainable ICT-Supported Neighborhood Development—A Maturity Model
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Machine Learning Technologies for Sustainability in Smart Cities in the Post-COVID Era

by
Ana De Las Heras
,
Amalia Luque-Sendra
* and
Francisco Zamora-Polo
Departamento Ingeniería del Diseño, Escuela Politécnica Superior, Universidad de Sevilla, Virgen de África, 7, 41011 Sevilla, Spain
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Sustainability 2020, 12(22), 9320; https://doi.org/10.3390/su12229320
Submission received: 14 October 2020 / Revised: 29 October 2020 / Accepted: 6 November 2020 / Published: 10 November 2020
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Technologies for Sustainability in Smart Cities)

Abstract

:
The unprecedented urban growth of recent years requires improved urban planning and management to make urban spaces more inclusive, safe, resilient and sustainable. Additionally, humanity faces the COVID pandemic, which especially complicates the management of Smart Cities. A possible solution to address these two problems (environmental and health) in Smart Cities may be the use of Machine Learning techniques. One of the objectives of our work is to thoroughly analyze the link between the concepts of Smart Cities, Machine Learning techniques and their applicability. In this work, an exhaustive study of the relationship between Smart Cities and the applicability of Machine Learning (ML) techniques is carried out with the aim of optimizing sustainability. For this, the ML models, analyzed from the point of view of the models, techniques and applications, are studied. The areas and dimensions of sustainability addressed are analyzed, and the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) are discussed. The main objective is to propose a model (EARLY) that allows us to tackle these problems in the future. An inclusive perspective on applicability, sustainability scopes and dimensions, SDGs, tools, data types and Machine Learning techniques is provided. Finally, a case study applied to an Andalusian city is presented.

1. Introduction

By 2030, the number of people living in cities is estimated to reach 5 billion, and by 2050, two-thirds of humanity will live in cities [1].
In recent years, trends such as the lack of natural resources, overcrowding in urban areas, the enormous production of waste and the pollution generated in these areas have been highlighted [2]. Technological developments can help alleviate these effects by taking data and analyzing them to provide recommendations for improving sustainability parameters. The digital transformation is helping cities to become smart spaces.
The United Nations has proposed a working agenda known as the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) [3]. The SDGs emerged from the relative success of the Millennium Development Goals [4]; they have a time horizon ranging from 2015 to 2030 [3]. The SDGs are a first-level challenge, and require the coordinated participation of multiple actors (public administration, businesses, non-governmental organizations) to achieve them [4,5].
Sustainable Development Goal number 11 (SDG 11) focuses on the sustainability of communities and cities [3]. The unprecedented urban growth of recent years requires improved urban planning and management to make urban spaces more inclusive, safe, resilient and sustainable [3]. One of the keys to the SDG agenda is integrative nature. It is not possible to move forward with SDGs in isolation, because they are interconnected [5]. The standardization carried out by the AENOR technical committee AEN/CTN 178, focused on the Intelligent Cities, is producing multiple benefits for our cities, the companies in the technology sector and, in short, for the citizens, the final objective of this effort [6].
Additionally, humanity is facing the pandemic by SARs-COV-2 (COVID-19), which is especially linked to the management of Smart Cities [7]. As the pandemic expands its impact, measures are being taken to curb its growth. However, while the focus is on health data exchange.
Undoubtedly, the management of aspects such as public transport, large concentrations of people, the correlation between contamination and the spread of the virus are issues that must be addressed in the immediate future. Many cities had opted for public transport as a means of trying to alleviate the pollution produced by various means of transport [8]. However, the appearance of this disease has put their popularity at risk if measures are not taken to allow maintaining social distance [9].
Cities are key agents in the transformation of modern economies. The International Telecommunications Union (2014) agreed on a definition of Smart City as “an innovative city that uses information and communication technologies and other means to improve the quality of life, the efficiency of urban operation and services, and competitiveness, ensuring that meets the needs of present and future generations with respect to economic, social and environmental aspects ” [10].
This work aims to take advantage of the data generated by Smart Cities, with which Machine Learning techniques can be applied aimed at improving sustainability. These improvements should serve to provide answers to the current situation facing humanity due to the health crisis due to COVID 19.
The pandemic will have a strong impact on the achievement of the 2030 agenda, the United Nations has warned. [8]. The United Nations in its recent report on the current situation of compliance with the SDGs [11]. In fact, although the pandemic is affecting all regions of the planet, the impact on the poorest people and regions is more severe. The United Nations report points out some implications for each of the SDGs: it is estimated that the number of people who will suffer extreme poverty will increase by 71 million (SDG1), COVID19 puts food production and distribution systems at risk (SDG2), it can lead to an increase in infant mortality and a reduction in vaccination rates (SDG3), it will increase inequities in education (SDG4), confinements are increasing the risk of women and girls to suffer bullying of the type sexual, physical or psychological (SDG5), one of the main measures to stop the pandemic is hand washing; however, many people do not have the necessary infrastructure to carry out adequate hand washing (SDG6), sanitary facilities require an electricity supply and a good option can go through the use of renewable energies (SDG7), the pandemic is causing a serious economic crisis that together with the acceleration of digitization can have a negative effect on employment (SDG8), the drop in consumption puts at risk the development of industries such as the aeronautical industry (SDG9), affects people unevenly, having a greater effect on people more poor (SDG10), the spread of the virus is faster in urban areas (SDG11), it represents an opportunity for responsible consumption (SDG12), it has reduced greenhouse gas emissions (SDG13), the lower consumption implies less waste in the seas and oceans, although gloves and masks pose a new risk (SDG14), the loss of biodiversity and trade in protected species can increase the risk of pandemics such as COVID19 (SDG15), the situation of inequality can increase and deepen existing conflicts, at the same time making life more difficult for the persecuted and refugees (SDG16). Finally, COVID 19 can put at risk the mechanisms of collaboration between countries to contribute to a development agenda [11].
Due to its wide scope and areas of influence, the COVID-19 pandemic will jeopardize the process of implementing the SDGs [4]. It is expected that, as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic and the suppression and mitigation strategies adopted, the world economy will head towards a global recession [12].
It is intended to keep the global economy afloat through International Monetary Fund [12] and other funds, while trying to find new ways of working (for example, expanding teleworking) [13].
The pandemic has caused major disruptions in the labor market [13], which are expected to grow as long as the pandemic persists. Furthermore, subsequent economic shocks are likely to further impact the quantity and quality of jobs, as well as vulnerable groups [13].
On the other hand, the pandemic has brought a reduction in greenhouse gases and air pollution, mainly due to a drop in the consumption of fossil fuels as planes are grounded, transport reduced, trade hampered, and factories closed. The drop in greenhouse gas emissions is the largest since the use of fossil fuels [14] began.
The social and environmental consequences of the fight against the pandemic will be very important, both the negative impacts on employment and income, as well as the positive impacts on air pollution (for example, the fight against the pandemic can lead to mass surveillance [15,16] or negative environmental impacts of ongoing cleaning and disinfection activities [17]).
The pandemic is changing aspects such as mobility with confinements [18], the way in which teaching is delivered [19], or the increase in telework [20]. It is necessary to develop an economy that is compatible with more sustainable and resilient human societies [14,21].
Machine learning (ML) is the study of computer algorithms that automatically improve through experience [22,23]. It is considered a subset of artificial intelligence. Machine learning algorithms build a mathematical model based on sample data, known as “training data”, in order to make predictions or decisions without being explicitly programmed to do so [24].
The technological advance that ICTs are driving and their integration into urban environments should be aligned with local urban dynamics and local needs. In this way, as suggested by [25], digital technologies can become an asset in the development of urban communities and effectively support their sustainable growth [26,27].
How governments must operate in the context of the Smart City to overcome the challenges and favor a business and innovation ecosystem, as well as public–private collaboration, is highlighted in [28].
In [29], useful ideas are offered to improve the efficiency of the management of companies in Smart City projects, since increasing the effectiveness of Smart Cities projects will achieve more economically, socially and environmentally sustainable cities. The combination of ML, IoT and Big Data tools offer great potential to developers of Smart City technologies and services [10].
However, more traditional machine learning techniques assume a fixed training model and a static context. These assumptions do not apply to Smart City applications where the environment and consequently data evolve rapidly.
Challenges include data recycling, efficient sampling, and scalable model design. There are cutting-edge methods and approaches that embrace Smart City big data towards future cognitive Smart Cities. Machine learning techniques can be incorporated according to the big data hierarchy in the Smart City. In [2], a semi-supervised deep reinforcement learning framework is proposed to address the challenges presented in various Smart City applications. It also presents trends and future work to incorporate machine learning into new Smart City services.
In [3], a machine learning model is presented that aims to collect evidence through the analysis of original studies to determine the effectiveness of interventions related to SDG 2. By collecting and summarizing current evidence and providing objective recommendations, it is intended assist in decision making and demonstrate that machine learning models can be valuable in putting evidence in the hands of politicians.
There is a need to analyze the post-COVID era from an urban point of view and to advance how Smart City networks should work for greater data exchange in the event of outbreaks or disasters, leading to better globalization, understanding and management of data.
Thus, humanity is faced with an environmental problem coupled with a health problem. A society in which health is going to be an even more essential component is going to demand the creation of intelligent sustainable cities that combine the sustainability/health vector. Digitalization was already on the urban agenda, and this process has accelerated. Mega-cities are becoming uncontrollable sources of disease because of their scale [30].
As we can see in Figure 1, Machine Learning techniques can be used as a possible solution to address both problems (environmental and health) in Smart Cities. The extraordinary progress that Smart Cities’ solutions have experienced with the incorporation of technologies such as artificial intelligence or Big Data, can allow us to be much better prepared, in the short and medium term, to face new crises, be they health, environmental, social or even economic.
The reality of cities will be very marked by the management of the pandemic and compliance with the SDGs. An analysis has been carried out of what has been done so far to elucidate, prospectively, where it is possible to continue working on promoting sustainability in cities. The context in which we do it is that of managing a pandemic that undoubtedly marks the functioning of cities.
The main objective of this work is to propose a conceptual framework that helps researchers to address sustainability problems in Smart Cities in the post-COVID era, making use of current Machine Learning techniques.
As far as we know, this approximation is not widespread enough. We detected an opportunity gap in the investigation of the state of the art, with the aim of proposing a conceptual framework that can help in tackling these types of problems.
It is intended to analyze experiences of application of machine learning techniques to improve sustainability, and address the research question:
How can machine learning tools contribute to the sustainability of Smart Cities in the current pandemic context?
In this work, an exhaustive study of the relationship between the Smart Cities and the applicability of Machine Learning (ML) techniques is carried out with the aim of optimizing sustainability. To this end, the ML models analyzed are studied from the point of view of models, techniques and applications. The areas and dimensions of sustainability addressed are analyzed, and the SDGs addressed are discussed.
An integrative perspective on applicability, sustainability domains and dimensions, SDGs, tools, data types and ML techniques is provided.
In the following sections, the methodology followed is detailed, the results obtained are shown, the results are discussed, including a case study, and conclusions are drawn.
A comprehensive review of the literature available in the Web of Science (WOS) database was conducted. Specific criteria were used, which aimed to examine all publications that carried out the development of a case study applied to cities with Machine Learning techniques applied to city sustainability.
The results show a bibliometric analysis that aims to analyze the network of keywords used in the articles to analyze the most used terms, a co-citation and co-occurrence analysis that reveals the most cited authors and organizations with the greatest impact on publications, as well as an analysis of the WOS categories in the publications database that show the areas in which the research is carried out.

2. Materials and Methods

A systematic review of the literature [31,32] was carried out taking into account the main areas of the study: “Smart City”/“Smart Cities”, “Machine Learning” and “Open Data” (Figure 2).
The literature search was developed in four phases, as can be seen in Figure 3.
In phase 1, “Initial Research”, the design parameters are defined. The WOS database was selected as the ideal database because of its high scientific impact, the diversity of databases that make it up and the thematic versatility of formats or types of documents that it supports, ranging from scientific articles, books and book chapters to presentations at conferences or bibliographic reviews. There are numerous works that use the WOS as a source of information [33].
The search performed in this phase was carried out as follows:
A first search with the terms “Smart City” OR “Smart Cities” yielded 12,589 records. Then, two associated searches were made refining with the term “machine learning” and on the other hand with the term “open data”. Both refinements were then screened with the time period of the last five years (2015-2019), with the format type “article” and from the “science technology” database. The results obtained were:
A.
Smart City/Cities + Machine Learning + 2015–2019 + articles + science technology = 170 publications.
B.
Smart City/Cities + Open Data + 2015–2019 + articles + science technology = 91 publications.
After a first analysis and reading of the abstracts of the results of search B, most of the publications of this search were discarded for being out of scope. Thus, the 170 publications of search A constituted the basis of our work.
For the second phase, 1st restriction, the in-depth reading of the titles and abstracts of all publications was carried out with the following discard criteria:
  • − The content of the article was outside the scope of the study.
  • − The paper did not describe a data application.
After this analysis, 60 publications were discarded because they did not meet the requirements, 110 articles were considered.
Subsequently, the full texts of the 110 publications were analyzed, using the same exclusion criteria as in the previous stage. Eleven were discarded, and 99 moved on to the next phase (in-depth analysis). It is necessary to point out that among these 99 articles there were some for which there was doubt as to whether they met the requirements of the study. Therefore, a second analysis by the research team was carried out to continue to include and/or discard criteria (such as, for example, exclusion of health issues, methodological developments with simulations that do not have real data, etc.).
Finally, 65 publications were considered for phase 4, called “final papers”. In this phase, a more in-depth analysis of four areas of research is carried out: the SDGs that the study refers to, the Machine Learning techniques they use, the data used in the case study, and the application of sustainability in the Smart Cities to which it refers. This aspect was the last study to be carried out in this phase of the review methodology, as a wide variety of application areas were obtained that needed to be classified. A Pareto diagram [34] was developed for them, with the aim of grouping the documents into clusters.
In phase 1, “Initial Research”, a search was carried out with the terms “Smart City” or “Smart Cities”, refining with the term “machine learning” with the time period of the last five years (2015–2019), with the “article” format type and the “science technology” database. The results obtained were 170 publications that formed the basis of our work and on which the bibliographic analysis has been developed, the results of which are shown in Section 3.1.
In the following phases, publications were analyzed discarding those whose content was outside the scope of the study or whose document did not describe a data application, considering 65 publications in phase 4 called “final articles”.
Figure 3 shows a summary of the results of each of the stages of the comprehensive review. The following section shows the development of the analysis of the 65 papers of the final stage that allow the development of the proposal of the tool under investigation.

3. Results

In this section, each of the blocks of results of the research carried out was developed, starting with the bibliometric analysis of the publications database, with the aim of analyzing the keyword networks that were most applied, the organizations and countries with the greatest impact, and the WOS categories in which the publications were classified on the basis of a co-citation and co-occurrence analysis.
Next, the EARLY model is presented. The objective of this model is to provide an analysis structure that will allow us to address the problems (environmental and health) in Smart Cities in the future. It provides an inclusive perspective on the applicability, domains and dimensions of sustainability, SDGs, tools, data types and machine learning techniques.
After this, the analysis of the three main groups of results of the 65 final papers analyzed is carried out: SDG–Sustainability Relationship, Application–Sustainability–Data and Application–Sustainability–Machine Learning Techniques.
Finally, a case study using the proposed model will be applied for the city of Malaga.
The main contributions of this work, in the context of the post-COVID era, can be summarized as:
  • A bibliometric analysis of the publications database.
  • A conceptual framework that provides an inclusive perspective on the applicability, domains and dimensions of sustainability, SDGs, tools, data types and machine learning techniques.
  • A case study with the proposed model applied to the city of Malaga.

3.1. Bibliographic Results

3.1.1. Bibliometric Analysis

A bibliometric analysis of the database selected in phase 1 “Initial research” was performed. This analysis allowed us to analyze the current state of publications in order to obtain a map of the most used keywords, the most representative authors, the organizations with the greatest number of publications, and the greatest impact on them, as well as the WOS categories into which the articles being analyzed were classified.
The methodological structure was based on the proposal of Zhao and Strotmann [35]. This strategy consists of four stages: definition of search keywords and the database, data cleaning and formatting, initial data analysis, and in-depth analysis (networks and results).
As a basis for the bibliometric study, the 170 articles obtained in the first phase of the methodology described in the previous section were used. The search for publications in this phase was restricted to the last five years (2015–2019) after analyzing previous work on bibliometrics in the field of Machine Learning [36,37] due to the growing interest in this field in recent years, as well as the direct relationship between the publication of the SDGs in 2015 [38] and their applications to date.
In the next step, the data was refined. Some of the fields were not standardized, which could affect the reliability of the analyses, since variations in the nomenclature of an author, for example, would be interpreted as being two independent authors. Given the volume of the sample, it was necessary to perform the data refinement with the support of the open source software OpenRefine© [39], version 3.3, through which the author and organization variables were normalized.
After refining the data, the study carried out corresponded to a bibliometric analysis that allowed us to know the incidence and established networks of key words, authors and their reference organizations, sources and countries.
Data processing was performed using the VOSviewer© [40] software, version 1.6.15. This software, focused on the analysis of bibliometric and sociometric networks, allows the analysis of co-authorship of the sample based on authors, organizations or countries, co-occurrence of key words, bibliographic coupling, citation and co-citation of documents, sources, authors, organizations or countries, mapping of co-authorship networks, co-citation, bibliographic coupling and co-occurrence of key words of the selected bibliographic sample.
The visualization of bibliometric and sociometric networks is often done using one of three basic approaches: distance-based, graphical and time-based approaches [41]. The VOSviewer© tool uses the approach based on distance and force of association, approximating those nodes that are closer, i.e., those with a smaller geodesic distance [42]. In general, the smaller the distance between two nodes, the greater their relationship, i.e., their similarity. For the calculation of the network, the input is a normalized co-occurrence matrix, on which the association force index or proximity index is calculated based on the co-occurrence variables between the nodes or references and the expected number of co-occurrences, understanding that these are independent variables [43]. Thus, the Sikh similarity between two nodes i and j can be calculated using Equation (1).
S i j =   C i j W i W j
where Cij is the number of co-occurrences of nodes i and j and where Wj is the total of the number of occurrences of nodes i and j or the total of co-occurrence numbers of these nodes.
The result of this analytical process was a complete map of scientific production related to the search terms, in which the resulting network of keywords can be seen (Figure 4).
The following analyses were carried out [40,44]:
  • Co-occurrence analysis: used to measure the co-occurrence of “keyword authors”, it bases its analysis on determining the number of documents in which they appear together.
  • Bibliographic coupling analysis: this type of analysis was applied to the authors of publications. The relationship between authors is measured according to the number of bibliographic references they share among their publications.
  • Co-authorship analysis: this analysis measures the relationship of the items based on the number of co-authorships in the documents. This type of analysis was applied to the reference organizations of the authors of the publications analyzed.
  • Citation analysis: this analysis, performed for the “source” variable, i.e., journals and publishers in which the documents are published, determines the relationship based on the number of times they are cited.
  • Co-citation analysis: applied to the “sources”, this analysis explains the relationships according to the number of times the “sources” are cited together.
The result of this analytical process shows a complete map of the scientific production related to the search terms where, first of all, the resulting network of keywords can be seen (Figure 4).
As can be inferred from the Figure 4, those keywords used in the publications with the highest occurrence coincide with the search terms: “Machine Learning” with 62 documents, “Smart City” with 43 documents, and “Smart Cities” with 39 documents. After this first group of influence, there was another group of keywords related to the internet and digitalization, with a similar occurrence: “internet” appears in 24 documents, “big data” in 23, and “internet of things” in 17 publications. In this first network, it is possible to analyze the linking strength between the terms and those that have the greatest linking strength, and which are therefore are more focused and connected, are again the search terms, followed by the second group of words related to industry 4.0 and digitization [45,46].
With regard to the analysis of the organizations carrying out research in the field of Smart Cities and the application of Machine Learning techniques in case studies with available data, there are no networks between them, that is, they are disconnected and the research is isolated.
In the following tables (Table 1 and Table 2) two analyses of the organizations can be seen: a ranking by number of documents, and a second analysis by number of quotations. According to the number of documents, Ottawa University is at the top with 6 documents, followed by Sejong University with 4. The disconnection between organizations means that there are focuses of influence in the USA, Europe and Asian countries, and it is not possible to describe a research trend related to the organizations’ countries of origin.
With regard to the number of citations of published works, there were two universities located in North America and Australia, positioning it as the region of the world with the greatest influence on their work: La Trobe University with 93 citations, and the University of Ottawa with 88 citations. They are far higher than European and Asian organizations: Imperial College of London (65 citations), King Abdulaziz University (57 citations), Canadian University of Dubai (45 citations), Lulea University Technology, and the University of Edinburgh with 44 citations.
Subsequently, the categories, according to the Web of Science, were analyzed. Figure 5 shows that there are two main areas in which the largest number of publications are concentrated: “Engineering, Electrical & Electronic” and the area of computer science with the categories “Computer Science, Information” and “Telecommunications”. Likewise, we can observe annexed nuclei with little connection related to “Chemistry, Analytical”, transport and civil engineering and “Environmental Sciences”.
Finally, with regard to the years of publication, there was a greater concentration of the main categories in the years 2017 and 2018, but categories related to sustainability were observed as the most current study focus, creating an emerging research niche with the WOS categories “Environmental Sciences” and “Green & Sustainable Science & Technology”.

3.1.2. Bibliographic Analysis for the Conceptual Framework Proposal

Articles were grouped according to the application to which they refer. From an analysis of these applications, we found that most of them focus on a few topics (Figure 6).
After applying a Pareto analysis (see Figure 6), it was concluded that these 65 papers were mainly grouped into five large clusters:
  • Transport
  • Energy
  • Water and Air
  • Location
  • Social transformation.

3.2. A New Conceptual Framework for Implementing Machine Learning Techniques in Smart Cities. EARLY

As mentioned in the previous sections, a possible solution is sought to address these two problems (environmental and health) in Smart Cities through the use of Machine Learning techniques.
The main objective will be to propose a model (EARLY) (see Figure 7) that allows us to address these problems in the future. An inclusive perspective on applicability, sustainability applications, scopes and dimensions, SDGs, tools, data types and machine learning techniques is provided.
The process of optimizing sustainability in Smart Cities can be long and complex if the preparatory techniques are not properly used. The EARLY method is a graphical tool whose approach aims to help with the translation of the needs of the Smart City in the field of sustainability into technical specifications on data, applications, Machine Learning techniques and SDGs.
The EARLY model in a graphic representation with several zones to represent the results of the previously commented study.
In principle, it consists of four zones, each of which is used for a function, although its structure can vary greatly depending on the type of use and the amount of data available.
The central area corresponds to the application or application of sustainability in the Smart City addressed. Cross-cutting with the application we can think, in this initial state of definition of the optimization problem, in terms of the SDGs that we seek to promote.
The list of data must include the aspects that we would need to know (or those that we know) to apply the techniques of artificial intelligence successfully. At this point, the more data the better, without forgetting or neglecting any aspect, should be included, since the less relevant data will be discarded later.
Next, the appropriate Machine Learning techniques must be defined to address the optimization problem with the data considered.

3.2.1. Relationship SDG-Sustainability

The Sustainable Development Goals emerge from the relative success of the Millennium Development Goals [4,5]. SDGs constitute a working agenda that aims to set the course for world governments in the time period between 2015 and 2030 [3]. SDGs are a set of 17 Goals with 169 targets and 263 indicators [3].
One of the objectives, SDG 11, in particular, is specifically dedicated to building sustainable cities and communities [3]. Although the concept of SC started out as being properly linked to the development of technological features. The concept soon incorporated the sustainability dimension into the CS concept itself [47]. In this way, SCs can contribute to the development of Sustainable Development Goals [48].
One of the characteristics of Agenda 2030 is its indivisible nature [3]. The SDGs are closely related to each other [5,49]. The achievement of one has consequences on others, this may be the case of education [49] which, apart from being related to SDG 4, is also related to others such as SDG 5 (Gender Equality) or SDG 12 (Sustainable Consumption and Production), etc. Something similar occurs with the construction and implementation of CS [48]. The multidisciplinary nature of SCs means that their development is linked to other aspects such as the promotion of renewable energies and energy efficiency (SDG 7), air quality (SDG 3) and water quality (SDG 6), or the reduction of inequalities (SDG 10).
In line with previous studies on the relationship between SDGs and SCs. Machine learning methodologies can contribute to the development of SDGs. We believe that all of the articles analyzed have a relationship with SDG 11. In addition, we found articles related to SDG 3 (five articles), SDG 6 (two articles), SDG 7 (eleven articles) and SDG 10 (three articles).
Among the latter SDGs, SDG 7 had the largest number of items associated. There is no doubt that the development of SC is closely linked to energy saving and the promotion of renewable energies [48]. The articles related to this SDGs deal with topics such as the study of energy needs and consumption [50,51,52,53,54], thermal comfort in buildings [55,56], simulations [57] and measurements by intelligent electrical systems [58].
Sustainable Development Goal 3 seeks to ensure a healthy life and promote universal well-being. Among its goals is to reduce the number of deaths due to air and water pollution. A large number of the studies analyzed deal with air quality [59,60,61,62,63], while others seek to promote physical activity [64] or use machine learning techniques for health assessment [65].
Sustainable Development Goal 10 attempts to reduce the level of inequality. Among the studies that have been carried out, one analyses the risk of chronic social exclusion [66], the search for inequalities in schools according to their location [67]. NGDOs play a very important role in reducing these inequalities, and Gong et al. (2019) analyzed the participation of NGDOs in the construction of CS [68].
SDG 6 seeks to ensure access to clean water and sanitation. Among the articles analyzed, two of them study water quality [69,70].

3.2.2. Application of Sustainability–Data Relationship

As shown in [46], data is of great importance in the implementation of machine learning techniques.
There are many jobs where you need to request data, due to a stark data environment. The study carried out in [71] used data on materials, types of buildings and their geometry, as well as various data in the field of structures. In [72], data were taken from a business database to assess the environmental impact of roads, and in [73], mobility studies were carried out in the city of Chicago.
In [74,75], randomly collected data related to agriculture (seeds, fertilizers or pesticides) were used to estimate the environmental impact of rice and sugarcane farms, respectively.
The use of data from simulations is also very common. In [76], it was done with various factors on existing buildings. It is also possible to work with data generators, validated with experimental data, as was done in [77].
For both products and buildings, data can be collected at the conceptual design [78] or initial design [79] stages, for use in subsequent environmental assessment [77,78].
In view of the articles studied, it was considered essential to take into account the necessary data. In a first approximation, the data can be numerical (discrete or continuous) or categorical (hierarchical or not). Additionally, it is necessary to determine the necessary sample size and the number of characteristics to consider.
Images taken from videos were used as the source for the analyses in [80], being non-hierarchical categorical data. The initial sample size was 72,012 images of 224 * 224 * 3 pixels. In this work, seven publicly accessible videos were used for testing.
Sometimes, four groups of audio files have been used [81]. The first included files collected in a crowded city center (24,109, 15 classes). The second data set represented the sounds of household appliances (18,615, 7 classes). The third data set contained sounds from homes (20,238, 33 classes), representing human actions at home. Finally, the fourth data set included sounds of human actions in different places (17,221, 20 classes).
At other times, a previously published dataset was used [50]. The data set used contained 35 different variables of meteorological information (temperature, humidity, pressure, wind speed, visibility, dew point), household appliances and light energy consumption, and temporal data. These data were collected inside and through a network of exterior sensors from a two-story building and a nearby airport.
Public data from a bus company and the Alibaba platform have been used to predict the use of public transport [82]. Finally, the electricity consumed in homes by LCD monitors, heaters, lamps, refrigerators, printers, and smart TVs was studied by Rodríguez-Fernández et al. [54].

3.2.3. Relationship between Sustainability Applications and Machine Learning Techniques

The different works studied address the problem with different machine learning tools. These tools can be very diverse. For example, depending on the application, these can be supervised learning (univariate, multivariate regression, classification, etc.), unsupervised (for example, dimensionality reduction, segmentation) or reinforcement. Based on the models, one can speak of linear regression, logistic regression, Support Vector Machine (SVM), k-means and neural networks, among others.
Convolutional neural networks have been used to detect fire [80]. They were used for an image classification tool in 1000 categories. In this case, they only had to obtain four categories: no fire, no fire with mist, fire with mist, and fire without mist. The results were compared with those of AlexNet [83] and GoogleNet [84].
However, Rodríguez-Fernández et al. used the perceptron, using Adaptive Regularization Of Weights (AROW) and Normal Gaussian Herding (NHERD) [54].
Logistic regression, GBDTs and Random Forest were used as baselines. For passenger flow forecasting in [82], Autoregressive-moving Average (ARMA), a single-layer Artificial Neural Network (ANN) and linear regression Average (ARMA) were used.
Idowu et al. used Support Vector Machine (SVM), Regression Tree (RT), feed-forward neural network, and multiple linear regression [53].
On other occasions, the techniques of Naïve Bayes, Random Forest and Decision Tree [58] are used. The work presented in [85] was based on the use of Least Square (LS), Multilayer Perceptron (MLP) and k nearest neighbor (kNN).
The Hidden Markov models (HMMs) and segmented hierarchical infinite Hidden Markov models (siHMMs), Random Forest (RF), Linear Regression (LR) and Support Vector Regression (SVR) are used in [58].
In Reference [86] ANN, k-nearest neighbor (KNN) and RF have been employed for classification.

4. Discussion and Case Study

4.1. Contribution Discussion

This work is based on a detected opportunity gap. The objective of optimizing sustainability has not been, as far as we know, sufficiently explored through the use of Machine Learning algorithms. This paper aims to explore this path in cutting-edge research.
This work starts from the triple coincidence between the sectors of “Smart City”/“Smart Cities”, “Machine Learning” and “Open Data” (see Figure 2). During the refinement of the searches carried out, the search for “Open data” was eliminated, since the results obtained from the searches of these pairs of terms were very numerous, and not all of them were relevant.
The main contributions of this work, in the context of the post-COVID era, can be summarized as:
  • A bibliometric analysis of the publications database.
  • A conceptual framework that provides an inclusive perspective on the applicability, domains and dimensions of sustainability, SDGs, tools, data types and machine learning techniques.
  • A case study with the proposed model applied to the city of Malaga.
The analysis of the existing bibliography shows that, in the last 5 years, there has been an exponential growth in studies with practical applications aimed at the application of ML techniques to improve aspects of the sustainability of cities. Studies have been developed for application in the areas of energy management [87,88,89] that predict consumption and optimize its use thanks to the use of IoT, creating a sustainable and efficient city; there has been research focusing on traffic management to improve the lifestyle and pollution of vehicles in cities [90,91]; and there have been applications of sustainable constructions within cities promoting the use of IoT to significantly promote and accelerate the development of smart buildings with low energy consumption in the future, which implies the creation of sustainable construction environments [92,93,94]. Likewise, there is a line of research development focused on the use of ML techniques that help the planning of the main lines in a Smart City project in line with the spatial and urban peculiarities and the interactions of the subsystems creating a sustainable city since its conception [94,95,96].
From the analysis of published studies, it was extracted that there is a deficit in the development of research that addresses the relationship between Smart Cities and the applicability of Machine Learning (ML) techniques in order to optimize sustainability from the applicability, the domains and dimensions of sustainability, the SDGs, the types of data and the ML techniques used to process the data. That is why the need arises to create a model that encompasses all these factors in order to provide smart solutions for cities that optimize sustainability in any area of the urban structure. Likewise, derived from the current pandemic situation, where the intelligent management of health issues associated with society and cities, the proposed model could lead to an improvement in the development of useful applications for the need for data management and strategy development to improve the situation that affects us.
This work aims to satisfy the need for the existence of a holistic model for the development of a Smart City where all aspects derived from sustainability (dimensions and applications), data (types of data, obtaining these and ML techniques exist) and the implication of the SDGs in their development. Currently, there are no publications that encompass all these aspects, which represents an important gap, given the new scenario that significantly influences the concept of city and society that we currently have: COVID-19. This model could be a starting point for the early management of future situations with characteristics similar to the current pandemic, developing strategies and methods that help include intelligence as an active part in cities that allow the development of solutions that help the management of new applications in society and its urban structure.
The bibliographic study carried out delved deeply into those investigations in which the use of machine learning tools and their application to Smart Cities converge, and the results obtained are shown in the corresponding section.
The main contribution of this work is the proposal of a model (EARLY) that will be useful when addressing problems in Smart Cities in the future. As mentioned in the introductory section, these problems encompass environmental and health issues, gaining special relevance in the post-COVID era.
The proposed model aims to provide an inclusive perspective on the applicability, scope and dimensions of sustainability, SDGs, tools, data types and machine learning techniques.
To illustrate the applicability of the proposed model, a specific application case is shown, taking as a case study the Smart City of Malaga (Spain). This developed case study can be found in the next section.

4.2. Case Study. Malaga City

The Strategic Plan for Technological Innovation of the city of Malaga [97] establishes that, although in a Smart City new technologies are essential, it is necessary to highlight that neither these technologies nor the large volumes of information they generate can do by themselves that a city is smart, but these elements will be able to contribute intelligence to the extent that they are able to effectively satisfy the needs of its citizens. Therefore, an approach is established by which the city and all actions carried out in it comply with a scheme articulated in six strategic axes (sustainable and safe habitat, citizen services, smart mobility, digital transformation, ICT infrastructures and innovation economy).

4.2.1. Application

The application of the proposed case study will be described below. This application arises from the need to integrate a higher level of renewable energy resources to achieve the objectives set by the EU. This objective meets with some challenges, such as the need to actively control devices connected to a grid, the flattening of the charging curve and the incorporation of electric vehicles. In this case study, the medium voltage lines in the city of Malaga (Spain) were analyzed for the last five years, with the aim of optimizing the charging of electric vehicles and thus maintaining the stability of the distribution network. The actual implementation within the Smart City Malaga Project [97] included the installation of smart meters for all customers and new automation and communication systems through the network connected by a broadband power line communication network (see Figure 8). New management, control and integration systems were developed for all elements of energy consumption, production and storage through the distribution network. This case study is an example of how, through automation, the installation of new systems of innovation communication technologies (ICT), the use of smart sensors, distributed energy resources (DER) and demand control- In response, solutions are provided towards the European 20-20-20 target.
More specifically, potential is found in the areas of:
  • Use of infrastructure.
  • Fast charging at authorized points with exhaustive control.
  • Energy optimization by using night hours to recharge electric vehicles.
  • Active demand management, both for electric vehicle recharging processes and for other types of consumption.
  • Quality of supply and service and guarantee of system stability.
One of the conclusions of this case study obtained from the analysis of the charging curves is the maximum capacity potentially available to charge electric vehicles at night. The remaining capacity is estimated to be sufficient to load almost 5000 vehicles, in optimal conditions [99,100].
Another of the objectives addressed in this case study is the reduction of carbon dioxide emissions. Likewise, it works with smart meters and the data flows are adapted to the different use cases, in such a way that the data management is favored, taking into account their heterogeneity and variety [101].

4.2.2. SDGs

Analyzing the alignment of the main municipal plans that were aligned with the city’s strategy and their link with the SDGs [98], it is worth noting the more comprehensive nature of the Urban Agenda, which includes 15 of the 17 SDGs, as well as the program of municipal government (with 13 of 17 SDGs). The general urban planning plan follows them transversally, with nine integrated SDGs.
Once all the information from the different agents of the city, both public and private, had been collected and the progress report on the SDGs had been prepared, the city model of the Strategic Plan was aligned, the priorities of the existing plans were reviewed and those that really exist when carrying out actions, and yet an alignment of the Operational Program 2018–2021 of the city strategy was proposed, as well as other general criteria for the rest of municipal planning [98].
The results of the surveys were used to determine what the current priorities of the different agents and groups are, in which information was requested on the actions that were carried out on a regular basis and that were part of their essential competencies or objectives. Tabulating this information, we have an overview of the SDGs that are currently a priority for all the agents, and also for each one of them [98] (see Figure 9).
It can be seen that SDG 5, on gender equality, is the one with the highest number of actions by all agents, followed by SDG 17 (alliances to achieve the objectives), and SDG 4 (quality education). It is closely followed by actions linked to SDG 16 (peace, justice and strong institutions) and SDG 10 (fight against inequalities) and SDG 3 (healthy life) [98].
Rereading the city model under the prism of the 2030 Agenda demonstrates how the proposed development model is sustainable, since it incorporates the 17 SDGs as a whole. In addition, it establishes as a priority the axis linked to the sustainable and coastal nature of the metropolis, giving prominence to the Urban Agenda 2050 of the Malaga City Council.
Each of the star projects designed to execute the strategies of this four-axis model, affects different SDGs, so that until 2030, these are the priorities of the Strategic Plan (see Figure 10).
This process of locating the 2030 Agenda has led to the establishment of an Operational Program of the Strategic Plan that already incorporates these SDG priorities. The Program, designed until 2021, establishes the set of actions to be carried out. Of the total of 42 actions collected, SDG 8 (for economic growth and decent work) and SDG 11 (for a resilient and sustainable city) are the ones that will mark the actions of the next three years in the metropolis [98].
The plan makes a final proposal for monitoring and promoting this localization process in such a way that each year progress is reported, and everyone is gradually involved so that no one is left behind.

4.2.3. Data

The ideal Smart City model needs to collect all the data necessary to make the city a Smart City. They are a fundamental part of keeping the city connected and informed, and making each subsystem fulfill its function [101].
The project of making Malaga a Smart City is focused on energy management. The integration of renewable sources into the electricity grid has been chosen, with the aim of increasing efficiency and reducing carbon dioxide emissions. The intention is that this energy control system also reaches homes.
The installation of more than 17,000 smart meters has been carried out, and a sample of 50 of these users have energy efficiency solutions for the home. Emblematic buildings in the area have energy efficiency solutions installed at their headquarters, with which they can monitor their consumption and control some of their loads [101].
Advanced automation systems have been installed in more than 20 transformation centers, and a total of 72 centers are communicated thanks to a broadband PLC (PowerLine Communication) network, which connects any point of the electrical network to the control center of network, where these assets will be monitored [101].

4.2.4. Machine Learning

An example of using Machine Learning to promote sustainability in Malaga is the PASTORA Project (Preventive Analysis of Smart Grids with Real Time Operation and Renewable Assets Integration). This project [100] combines artificial intelligence and Big Data to create intelligent networks that allow improved real-time control and preventive maintenance of the distribution network that reaches homes [99].
In this project, big data technologies and machine learning techniques based on deep learning and artificial intelligence are used to exploit the millions of data offered by the intelligent network. This information will allow the development of predictive models of how the network will behave in order to improve its operation, avoid incidents and increase the quality of service to end customers [102].
The goal of these massive data analysis and machine learning tools is to enable the integration of renewables and electric vehicles by predicting the state of the grid and anticipating where incidents may occur to direct maintenance work and investments to points most needed.
Smart transformers with integrated sensors, real-time information processing tools thanks to big data, analysis of historical data series to prevent and predict incidents, etc. All these tools will be tested through the PASTORA Project in the SmartCity Malaga Living Environment Lab [99].
In summary, deep learning and all the projects that include it in the energy sector seek intelligent and innovative solutions for the development of smart grids, while trying to respond to new needs with the integration of renewable energies, new self-consumption models and the progressive incorporation of the electric car [103].

4.2.5. Evaluation

SmartCity Malaga is recognized worldwide as one of the largest projects in the field of Smart Grids, both due to its size and the multiplicity of work areas involved. This is demonstrated by the numerous visits by authorities and organizations, public and private, who have wanted to be participants in this pioneering initiative and leader in the sector.
From the start of the SmartCity Malaga project in 2009 to its completion in 2013, the main advances have been: a saving of more than 25% in the electricity consumption of the implantation area thanks to the use of energy efficiency systems with monitoring, control and active demand management for industrial and residential users. In the case of residential collaborators, 42% decreased energy consumption by more than 10% thanks to the use of domestic energy efficiency kits that allowed them to manage their spending from anywhere in the world through a smartphone. In addition, 4,500 tons of CO2 emissions per year have been avoided [97].

5. Conclusions

Humanity is facing the SARs-COV-2 (COVID-19) pandemic, which is especially linked to the management of Smart Cities. It is necessary to analyze the post-COVID era from an urban point of view and move forward on how Smart City networks should work for greater data sharing in the event of outbreaks or disasters, leading to better globalization, understanding and management of the data.
In this work, the link between the concepts of Smart Cities, Machine Learning techniques and their applicability was exhaustively analyzed. As far as we know, there are no previous works on this. A comprehensive study of the relationship between Smart Cities and the applicability of machine learning (ML) techniques has been carried out with the aim of optimizing sustainability. With this intention, Machine Learning models were studied from the point of view of models, techniques and applications. The areas and dimensions of sustainability were analyzed, and the SDGs were discussed.
A model (EARLY) was proposed that allows us to address these challenges in the future. These issues encompass environmental and health issues, taking on special relevance in the post-COVID era. An inclusive perspective on applicability, sustainability scopes and dimensions, SDGs, tools, data types and machine learning techniques was provided. Finally, a case study applied to an Andalusian city was presented.
It was detected that there is a disconnect between organizations when conducting research, which, given the current situation of difficulty in obtaining data, opens the possibility for an improvement in research with the connection between various institutions that can provide analysis techniques in the data provided by others, creating clusters of work and specialization.
On the basis of the bibliographic analysis carried out, it was concluded that the main areas of work on this subject according to the WOS categorization are “engineering, electrical & electronic”, “computer science, information” and “telecommunications”. There were other clusters that were not very connected and with a lower density of publications. After performing the temporal analysis of these small clusters, it was concluded that the categories “environmental sciences” and “green & sustainable science & technology” (related to sustainability) were those found in recent years (2018–2019) that were emerging and cross-cutting themes in the field of Smart Cities.
On the other hand, many of the documents studied were discarded, since there are few papers that contain an applicable theme. Additionally, some have little to do with Smart Cities.
The Pareto analysis carried out detected five main clusters in the topics addressed: transport, energy, water and air, location and social issues, highlighting the main areas of research interest at this time.
The importance of having quality data is confirmed, many of the papers work with public data, data already published, simulated or without data. It is crucial that the data is available, and it is important that future Smart City projects take this into account as a priority in the future.
This work is part of a broader line of research, regarding optimization under sustainability criteria in Smart Cities through Machine Learning technologies. We trust that this work will serve as a basis for future research related to this topic. Specifically, this work is part of a broader line of work that aims to promote the SDGs and the design and development of products (especially focused, although not exclusively) on Smart Cities for the promotion of sustainability. One of the main future tasks, on which we are working, may be the application to the design of sustainable products, possibly framed in Smart Cities, using Machine Learning techniques.

Author Contributions

Formal analysis, writing—original draft preparation, writing—review and editing, A.D.L.H., F.Z.-P. and A.L.-S.; funding acquisition, A.L.-S.; conceptualization, F.Z.-P.; methodology and visualization, A.D.L.H. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by the Telefónica Chair “Intelligence in Networks” of the University of Seville (Spain), through project “SIDI”.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. United Nations, Department of Economic and Social Affairs, Population Division. World Urbanization Prospects: The 2018 Revision (ST/ESA/SER.A/420); United Nations: New York, NY, USA, 2019; ISBN 978-92-1-148319-2. [Google Scholar]
  2. Lytras, M.; Visvizi, A. Who Uses Smart City Services and What to Make of It: Toward Interdisciplinary Smart Cities Research. Sustainability 2018, 10, 1998. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  3. General Assembly of United Nations Transforming Our World: The 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development. Resolution Adopted by the General Assembly on 25 September 2015. Available online: http://www.un.org/ga/search/view_doc.asp?symbol=A/RES/70/1&Lang=E (accessed on 7 November 2018).
  4. Sachs, J.D. From Millennium Development Goals to Sustainable Development Goals. Lancet 2012, 379, 2206–2211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Zamora-Polo, F.; Sánchez-Martín, J.; Corrales-Serrano, M.; Espejo-Antúnez, L. What Do University Students Know about Sustainable Development Goals? A Realistic Approach to the Reception of this UN Program Amongst the Youth Population. Sustainability 2019, 11, 3533. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  6. Marcos, T. Más normas para las ciudades inteligentes. AENOR Rev. Norm. Certif. 2015, 209, 28–31. [Google Scholar]
  7. Won Sonn, J.; Lee, J.K. The smart city as time-space cartographer in COVID-19 control: The South Korean strategy and democratic control of surveillance technology. Eurasian Geogr. Econ. 2020, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Yi, H.-B.; Nie, Z. Mobility Innovation through an Efficient Mobile System for Bike Sharing on Campus. In Proceedings of the 2017 International Conference on Network and Information Systems for Computers (ICNISC), Shanghai, China, 14–16 April 2017; pp. 153–157. [Google Scholar]
  9. De Vos, J. The effect of COVID-19 and subsequent social distancing on travel behavior. Transp. Res. Interdiscip. Perspect. 2020, 5, 100121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Chin, J.; Callaghan, V.; Lam, I. Understanding and personalising smart city services using machine learning, the Internet-of-Things and Big Data. IEEE Int. Symp. Ind. Electron. 2017, 2050–2055. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  11. United Nations. The Sustainable Development Goals Report; United Nations Publications: New York, NY, USA, 2020; ISBN 978-92-1-004960-3. [Google Scholar]
  12. International Monetary Fund. Transcript of Kristalina Georgieva’s Participation in the World Health Organization Press Briefing. 2020. Available online: https://www.imf.org/en/News/Articles/%0A2020/04/03/tr040320-transcript-kristalina-georgieva-participation-world-health-organization-pressbriefing (accessed on 25 June 2020).
  13. ILO. COVID-19 and World of Work: Impacts and Responses 2020; International Labour Organization: Geneva, Switzerland, 2020. [Google Scholar]
  14. Lenzen, M.; Li, M.; Malik, A.; Pomponi, F.; Sun, Y.Y.; Wiedmann, T.; Faturay, F.; Fry, J.; Gallego, B.; Geschke, A.; et al. Global socio-economic losses and environmental gains from the coronavirus pandemic. PLoS ONE 2020, 15, 1–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Harari, Y. The world after coronavirus. Financ Times. 2020. Available online: https://www.ft.com/content/19d90308-6858-11ea-a3c9-1fe6fedcca75 (accessed on 12 October 2020).
  16. Mozur, P.; Zhong, R.; Krolik, A. Coronavirus Fight, China Gives Citizens a Color Code, with Red Flags. New York Times. 2020. Available online: https://www.nytimes.com/2020/03/01/business/china-coronavirus-surveillance.html (accessed on 10 October 2020).
  17. Mahbubani, R. More than 100 Wild Animals in China Died from Poisoning in A Mass Die-Off Seemingly Triggered by Coronavirus Disinfectant. Bussines Insid. Available online: https://www.businessinsider.in/science/news/more-than-100-wild-animals-died-from-poisoning-in-a-mass-die-off-seemingly-triggered-by-coronavirus-disinfectant/articleshow/74250392.cms (accessed on 10 October 2020).
  18. Bao, R.; Zhang, A. Does lockdown reduce air pollution? Evidence from 44 cities in northern China. Sci. Total Environ. 2020, 731, 139052. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Watermeyer, R.; Crick, T.; Knight, C.; Goodall, J. COVID-19 and digital disruption in UK universities: Afflictions and affordances of emergency online migration. High. Educ. 2020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Šagát, P.; Bartík, P.; Prieto González, P.; Tohănean, D.I.; Knjaz, D. Impact of COVID-19Quarantine on Low Back Pain Intensity, Prevalence, and Associated Risk Factors among Adult Citizens Residing in Riyadh (Saudi Arabia): A Cross-Sectional Study. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2020, 17, 7302. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. Stresses, S.-G. We Are Only as Strong as the Weakest; United Nations: New York, NY, USA, 2020. [Google Scholar]
  22. School of Computer Science Canergie Mellon University. Available online: www.cs.cmu.edu (accessed on 25 October 2020).
  23. Goodfellow, I.; Bengio, Y.; Courville, A. Deep Learning; MIT Press: Cmabridge, MA, USA, 2016; ISBN 978-0262035613. [Google Scholar]
  24. Koza, J.R.; Bennett, F.H.; Andre, D.; Keane, M.A. Automated Design of Both the Topology and Sizing of Analog Electrical Circuits Using Genetic Programming. In Artificial Intelligence in Design ’96; Springer: Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 1996; pp. 151–170. [Google Scholar]
  25. Petrillo, F.; Sardaro, R. Urbanizzazione in chiave neoliberale e progetti di sviluppo a grande scala. Sci. Reg. 2014, 125–134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Komninos, N.; Mora, L. Exploring the big picture of smart city research. Sci. Reg. 2018, 17, 15–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. De las Heras García de Vinuesa, A.; Aguayo González, F.; Cördoba Roldan, A. Propuesta de marco de trabajo para la evaluación de la sostenibilidad de productos desde el paradigma de la economía circular basada en la industria 4.0 (parte 1). DYNA Ing. E Ind. 2018, 93, 360–364. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Ferraris, A.; Santoro, G.; Pellicelli, A.C. “Openness” of public governments in smart cities: Removing the barriers for innovation and entrepreneurship. Int. Entrep. Manag. J. 2020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Ferraris, A.; Santoro, G.; Bresciani, S.; Carayannis, E.G. HR practices for explorative and exploitative alliances in smart cities: Evidences from smart city managers’ perspective. Manag. Decis. 2018, 56, 1183–1197. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Aldekoa, A. Las Ciudades Tras el COVID 19. Available online: https://www.eixoatlantico.com/es/noticias/opinion/4639-las-ciudades-tras-el-covid-19 (accessed on 1 May 2020).
  31. Tranfield, D.; Denyer, D.; Smart, P. Towards a Methodology for Developing Evidence-Informed Management Knowledge by Means of Systematic Review. Br. J. Manag. 2003, 14, 207–222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Sorrell, S. Improving the evidence base for energy policy: The role of systematic reviews. Energy Policy 2007, 35, 1858–1871. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Zamora-Polo, F.; Luque-Sendra, A.; Sánchez-Martín, J.; Aguayo-González, F. Conceptual framework for the use of building information modeling in engineering education. Int. J. Eng. Educ 2019, 35, 744–755. [Google Scholar]
  34. Grosfeld-Nir, A.; Ronen, B.; Kozlovsky, N. The Pareto managerial principle: When does it apply? Int. J. Prod. Res. 2007, 45, 2317–2325. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Zhao, D.; Strotmann, A. Analysis and Visualization of Citation Networks. Synth. Lect. Inf. Concepts Retr. Serv. 2015, 7, 1–207. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. de Souza, J.T.; de Francisco, A.C.; Piekarski, C.M.; do Prado, G.F. Data mining and machine learning to promote smart cities: A systematic review from 2000 to 2018. Sustainability 2019, 11, 1077. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  37. Gupta, P.; Chauhan, S.; Jaiswal, M.P. Classification of Smart City Research—A Descriptive Literature Review and Future Research Agenda. Inf. Syst. Front. 2019, 21, 661–685. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Le Blanc, D. Towards Integration at Last? The Sustainable Development Goals as a Network of Targets. Sustain. Dev. 2015, 23, 176–187. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Verborgh, R.; De Wilde, M. Using OpenRefine; Pack Publishing Ltd.: Birmingham, UK, 2013; ISBN 9781783289080. [Google Scholar]
  40. van Eck, N.J.; Waltman, L. {VOSviewer} manual. Leiden Univeristeit Leiden 2013, 1, 1–53. [Google Scholar]
  41. van Eck, N.J.; Waltman, L. Visualizing Bibliometric Networks. In Measuring Scholarly Impact; Springer International Publishing: Cham, Switzerland, 2014; pp. 285–320. [Google Scholar]
  42. van Eck, N.J.; Waltman, L. Software survey: VOSviewer, a computer program for bibliometric mapping. Scientometrics 2010, 84, 523–538. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  43. van Eck, N.J.; Waltman, L.; Dekker, R.; van den Berg, J. A comparison of two techniques for bibliometric mapping: Multidimensional scaling and VOS. J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci. Technol. 2010, 61, 2405–2416. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  44. Donner, P.; Rimmert, C.; van Eck, N.J. Comparing institutional-level bibliometric research performance indicator values based on different affiliation disambiguation systems. Quant. Sci. Stud. 2020, 1, 150–170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Lom, M.; Pribyl, O.; Svitek, M. Industry 4.0 as a part of smart cities. In Proceedings of the 2016 Smart Cities Symposium Prague (SCSP), Prague, Czech Republic, 26–27 May 2016; pp. 1–6. [Google Scholar]
  46. Luque, A.; De Las Heras, A.; Ávila-Gutiérrez, M.J.; Zamora-Polo, F. ADAPTS: An Intelligent Sustainable Conceptual Framework for Engineering Projects. Sensors 2020, 20, 1553. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  47. Ontiveros, E.; Vizcaíno, D.; Sabater, V.L. Las Ciudades del Futuro: Inteligentes, Digitales y Sostenibles; Ariel y Fundación Telefónica: Barcelona, Spain, 2016; ISBN 9788408170242. [Google Scholar]
  48. Ismagiloiva, E.; Hughes, L.; Rana, N.; Dwivedi, Y. Role of Smart Cities in Creating Sustainable Cities and Communities: A Systematic Literature Review. In ICT Unbounded, Social Impact of Bright ICT Adoption. TDIT 2019. IFIP Advances in Information and Communication Technology; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2019; pp. 311–324. ISBN 9783030206710. [Google Scholar]
  49. González-Domínguez, J.; Sánchez-Barroso, G.; Zamora-Polo, F.; García-Sanz-Calcedo, J. Application of Circular Economy Techniques for Design and Development of Products through Collaborative Project-Based Learning for Industrial Engineer Teaching. Sustainability 2020, 12, 4368. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Chammas, M.; Makhoul, A.; Demerjian, J. An efficient data model for energy prediction using wireless sensors. Comput. Electr. Eng. 2019, 76, 249–257. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  51. Fenza, G.; Gallo, M.; Loia, V. Drift-Aware Methodology for Anomaly Detection in Smart Grid. IEEE Access 2019, 7, 9645–9657. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Pérez-Chacón, R.; Luna-Romera, J.; Troncoso, A.; Martínez-Álvarez, F.; Riquelme, J. Big Data Analytics for Discovering Electricity Consumption Patterns in Smart Cities. Energies 2018, 11, 683. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  53. Idowu, S.; Saguna, S.; Åhlund, C.; Schelén, O. Applied machine learning: Forecasting heat load in district heating system. Energy Build. 2016, 133, 478–488. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Rodríguez Fernández, M.; González Alonso, I.; Zalama Casanova, E. Online identification of appliances from power consumption data collected by smart meters. Pattern Anal. Appl. 2016, 19, 463–473. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Zang, M.; Xing, Z.; Tan, Y. IoT-based personal thermal comfort control for livable environment. Int. J. Distrib. Sens. Netw. 2019, 15, 155014771986550. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  56. Zhang, W.; Liu, F.; Fan, R. Improved thermal comfort modeling for smart buildings: A data analytics study. Int. J. Electr. Power Energy Syst. 2018, 103, 634–643. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Vázquez-Canteli, J.R.; Ulyanin, S.; Kämpf, J.; Nagy, Z. Fusing TensorFlow with building energy simulation for intelligent energy management in smart cities. Sustain. Cities Soc. 2019, 45, 243–257. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Siryani, J.; Tanju, B.; Eveleigh, T.J. A Machine Learning Decision-Support System Improves the Internet of Things’ Smart Meter Operations. IEEE Internet Things J. 2017, 4, 1056–1066. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Shamshirband, S.; Hadipoor, M.; Baghban, A.; Mosavi, A.; Bukor, J.; Várkonyi-Kóczy, A.R. Developing an ANFIS-PSO Model to Predict Mercury Emissions in Combustion Flue Gases. Mathematics 2019, 7, 965. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  60. Ameer, S.; Shah, M.A.; Khan, A.; Song, H.; Maple, C.; Islam, S.U.; Asghar, M.N. Comparative Analysis of Machine Learning Techniques for Predicting Air Quality in Smart Cities. IEEE Access 2019, 7, 128325–128338. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Dutta, D.; Pradhan, A.; Acharya, O.P.; Mohapatra, S.K. IoT based pollution monitoring and health correlation: A case study on smart city. Int. J. Syst. Assur. Eng. Manag. 2019, 10, 731–738. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Martínez-España, R.; Bueno-Crespo, A.; Timón, I.; Soto, J.; Muñoz, A.; Cecilia, J.M. Air-pollution prediction in smart cities through machine learning methods: A case of study in Murcia, Spain. J. Univers. Comput. Sci. 2018, 24, 261–276. [Google Scholar]
  63. Lin, B.; Huangfu, Y.; Lima, N.; Jobson, B.; Kirk, M.; O’Keeffe, P.; Pressley, S.; Walden, V.; Lamb, B.; Cook, D. Analyzing the Relationship between Human Behavior and Indoor Air Quality. J. Sens. Actuator Netw. 2017, 6, 13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  64. Malik, M.N.; Azam, M.A.; Ehatisham-Ul-Haq, M.; Ejaz, W.; Khalid, A. ADLAuth: Passive Authentication Based on Activity of Daily Living Using Heterogeneous Sensing in Smart Cities. Sensors 2019, 19, 2466. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  65. Verde, L.; De Pietro, G.; Alrashoud, M.; Ghoneim, A.; Al-Mutib, K.N.; Sannino, G. Leveraging Artificial Intelligence to Improve Voice Disorder Identification Through the Use of a Reliable Mobile App. IEEE Access 2019, 7, 124048–124054. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Serrano, E.; Bajo, J. Deep neural network architectures for social services diagnosis in smart cities. Futur. Gener. Comput. Syst. 2019, 100, 122–131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Estrada, E.; Maciel, R.; Ortíz Zezzatti, C.A.O.; Bernabe-Loranca, B.; Oliva, D.; Larios, V. Smart City Visualization Tool for the Open Data Georeferenced Analysis Utilizing Machine Learning. Int. J. Comb. Optim. Probl. Inform. 2018, 9, 25–40. [Google Scholar]
  68. Gong, Z.; Li, X.; Liu, J.; Gong, Y. Machine learning in explaining nonprofit organizations’ participation: A driving factors analysis approach. Neural Comput. Appl. 2019, 31, 8267–8277. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Ahmed, U.; Mumtaz, R.; Anwar, H.; Shah, A.A.; Irfan, R.; García-Nieto, J. Efficient Water Quality Prediction Using Supervised Machine Learning. Water 2019, 11, 2210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  70. Preciado, J.C.; Prieto, Á.E.; Benitez, R.; Rodríguez-Echeverría, R.; Conejero, J.M. A High-Frequency Data-Driven Machine Learning Approach for Demand Forecasting in Smart Cities. Sci. Program. 2019, 2019, 1–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. D’Amico, B.; Myers, R.J.; Sykes, J.; Voss, E.; Cousins-Jenvey, B.; Fawcett, W.; Richardson, S.; Kermani, A.; Pomponi, F. Machine Learning for Sustainable Structures: A Call for Data. Structures 2019, 19, 1–4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Perrotta, F.; Parry, T.; Neves, L.C.; Mesgarpour, M. A machine learning approach for the estimation of fuel consumption related to road pavement rolling resistance for large fleets of trucks. In Life Cycle Analysis and Assessment in Civil Engineering: Towards an Integrated Vision, Proceedings of the Sixth International Symposium on Life-Cycle Civil Engineering (IALCCE 2018), Ghent, Belgium, 28–31 October 2018; CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 2019; pp. 2011–2015. [Google Scholar]
  73. Cabot, M.I.; Luque, A.; de las Heras, A.; Aguayo, F. Aspects of sustainability and design engineering for the production of interconnected smart food packaging. PLoS ONE 2019, 14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Nabavi-Pelesaraei, A.; Rafiee, S.; Mohtasebi, S.S.; Hosseinzadeh-Bandbafha, H.; Chau, K. Integration of artificial intelligence methods and life cycle assessment to predict energy output and environmental impacts of paddy production. Sci. Total Environ. 2018, 631–632, 1279–1294. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  75. Kaab, A.; Sharifi, M.; Mobli, H.; Nabavi-Pelesaraei, A.; Chau, K. Combined life cycle assessment and artificial intelligence for prediction of output energy and environmental impacts of sugarcane production. Sci. Total Environ. 2019, 664, 1005–1019. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Sharif, S.A.; Hammad, A. Developing surrogate ANN for selecting near-optimal building energy renovation methods considering energy consumption, LCC and LCA. J. Build. Eng. 2019, 25, 100790. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Li, Y.; Zhang, H.; Roy, U.; Lee, Y.T. A data-driven approach for improving sustainability assessment in advanced manufacturing. In Proceedings of the 2017 IEEE International Conference on Big Data (Big Data), Boston, MA, USA, 11–14 December 2017; pp. 1736–1745. [Google Scholar]
  78. Wisthoff, A.; Ferrero, V.; Huynh, T.; DuPont, B. Quantifying the Impact of Sustainable Product Design Decisions in the Early Design Phase Through Machine Learning. In Proceedings of the Volume 4: 21st Design for Manufacturing and the Life Cycle Conference; 10th International Conference on Micro- and Nanosystems, Charlotte, NC, USA, 21–24 August 2016; American Society of Mechanical Engineers. [Google Scholar]
  79. Feng, K.; Lu, W.; Wang, Y. Assessing environmental performance in early building design stage: An integrated parametric design and machine learning method. Sustain. Cities Soc. 2019, 50, 101596. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Khan, S.; Muhammad, K.; Mumtaz, S.; Baik, S.W.; de Albuquerque, V.H.C. Energy-Efficient Deep CNN for Smoke Detection in Foggy IoT Environment. IEEE Internet Things J. 2019, 6, 9237–9245. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. AL Zamil, M.G.H.; Samarah, S.; Rawashdeh, M.; Karime, A.; Hossain, M.S. Multimedia-oriented action recognition in Smart City-based IoT using multilayer perceptron. Multimed. Tools Appl. 2019, 78, 30315–30329. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Zhang, N.; Chen, H.; Chen, X.; Chen, J. Forecasting Public Transit Use by Crowdsensing and Semantic Trajectory Mining: Case Studies. ISPRS Int. J. Geo-Inf. 2016, 5, 180. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  83. Almisreb, A.A.; Jamil, N.; Din, N.M. Utilizing AlexNet Deep Transfer Learning for Ear Recognition. In Proceedings of the 2018 Fourth International Conference on Information Retrieval and Knowledge Management (CAMP), Kota Kinabalu, Malaysia, 26–28 March 2018; pp. 1–5. [Google Scholar]
  84. Salavati, P.; Mohammadi, H.M. Obstacle Detection Using GoogleNet. In Proceedings of the 2018 8th International Conference on Computer and Knowledge Engineering (ICCKE), Mashhad, Iran, 25–26 October 2018; pp. 326–332. [Google Scholar]
  85. Hashemi, M. Reusability of the Output of Map-Matching Algorithms Across Space and Time Through Machine Learning. IEEE Trans. Intell. Transp. Syst. 2017, 18, 3017–3026. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Hossen, M.I.; Michael, G.K.O.; Connie, T.; Lau, S.H.; Hossain, F. Smartphone-Based Context Flow Recognition for Outdoor Parking System with Machine Learning Approaches. Electronics 2019, 8, 784. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  87. Abbas, S.; Khan, M.A.; Falcon-Morales, L.E.; Rehman, A.; Saeed, Y.; Zareei, M.; Zeb, A.; Mohamed, E.M. Modeling, Simulation and Optimization of Power Plant Energy Sustainability for IoT Enabled Smart Cities Empowered with Deep Extreme Learning Machine. IEEE Access 2020, 8, 39982–39997. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Li, C. Designing a short-term load forecasting model in the urban smart grid system. Appl. Energy 2020, 266, 114850. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Chui, K.T.; Lytras, M.D.; Visvizi, A. Energy Sustainability in Smart Cities: Artificial Intelligence, Smart Monitoring, and Optimization of Energy Consumption. Energies 2018, 11, 2869. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  90. Li, Z.; Al Hassan, R.; Shahidehpour, M.; Bahramirad, S.; Khodaei, A. A Hierarchical Framework for Intelligent Traffic Management in Smart Cities. IEEE Trans. Smart Grid 2019, 10, 691–701. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Fiore, U.; Florea, A.; Pérez Lechuga, G. An Interdisciplinary Review of Smart Vehicular Traffic and Its Applications and Challenges. J. Sens. Actuator Netw. 2019, 8, 13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  92. Huang, Q. Review: Energy-Efficient Smart Building Driven by Emerging Sensing, Communication, and Machine Learning Technologies. Eng. Lett. 2018, 26, 5. [Google Scholar]
  93. Bapin, Y.; Zarikas, V. Smart Building’s Elevator with Intelligent Control Algorithm based on Bayesian Networks. Int. J. Adv. Comput. Sci. Appl. 2019, 10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  94. Gonçalves, D.; Sheikhnejad, Y.; Oliveira, M.; Martins, N. One step forward toward smart city Utopia: Smart building energy management based on adaptive surrogate modelling. Energy Build. 2020, 223, 110146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  95. Panagiotopoulou, M.; Kokla, M.; Stratigea, A. Conceptualizing Small and Medium-Sized Smart Cities in the Mediterranean Region. Int. J. E-Plan. Res. 2019, 8, 17–41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. Mora, L.; Bolici, R.; Deakin, M. The First Two Decades of Smart-City Research: A Bibliometric Analysis. J. Urban Technol. 2017, 24, 3–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. Málaga, A. de Plan Estratégico de Innovación Tecnológica. Available online: http://malagasmart.malaga.eu/opencms/export/sites/msmart/.content/galerias/documentos/Plan_Estrategico_de_Innovacion_bajares.pdf (accessed on 1 July 2020).
  98. Fundación Ciedes La Alineación del Plan Estratégico de Málaga con la Agenda 2030 de Naciones Unidas. El Proceso de Elaboración de la Agenda ODS Málaga 2030. Available online: https://ciedes.es/el-plan/agenda-ods-2030.html (accessed on 20 June 2020).
  99. Endesa Proyecto PASTORA. Available online: https://lasciudadesinteligentes.com/generacion-electrica/big-data-deep-learning-energia-pastora/ (accessed on 26 June 2020).
  100. Endesa PASTORA, Inteligencia Artificial en la Red de Distribución. Available online: https://www.endesa.com/es/proyectos/todos-los-proyectos/transicion-energetica/redes-inteligentes/pastora-inteligencia-artificial-red-distribucion (accessed on 1 July 2020).
  101. Endesa, F. Smart Cities. Available online: https://www.fundacionendesa.org/es/recursos/a201908-smart-city (accessed on 29 June 2020).
  102. Sanchez Molina, P. Endesa Usa la Inteligencia Artificial en la Red de Distribución. Available online: https://www.pv-magazine.es/2019/01/09/endesa-usa-la-inteligencia-artificial-en-la-red-de-distribucion/ (accessed on 1 July 2020).
  103. Endesa Consejos Eficiencia Coche Eléctrico. Available online: https://lasciudadesinteligentes.com/movilidad-sostenible/consejos-eficiencia-coche-electrico/ (accessed on 1 July 2020).
Figure 1. Health and environmental challenges in the field of Smart Cities addressed by Machine Learning solutions.
Figure 1. Health and environmental challenges in the field of Smart Cities addressed by Machine Learning solutions.
Sustainability 12 09320 g001
Figure 2. Relationship between the object of the study.
Figure 2. Relationship between the object of the study.
Sustainability 12 09320 g002
Figure 3. Bibliographic research method.
Figure 3. Bibliographic research method.
Sustainability 12 09320 g003
Figure 4. Keyword network.
Figure 4. Keyword network.
Sustainability 12 09320 g004
Figure 5. WOS categories.
Figure 5. WOS categories.
Sustainability 12 09320 g005
Figure 6. Application clusters.
Figure 6. Application clusters.
Sustainability 12 09320 g006
Figure 7. EARLY proposal.
Figure 7. EARLY proposal.
Sustainability 12 09320 g007
Figure 8. Main and secondary objectives. Own elaboration adapted from [98].
Figure 8. Main and secondary objectives. Own elaboration adapted from [98].
Sustainability 12 09320 g008
Figure 9. Tabulating SDGs. Own elaboration adapted from [98].
Figure 9. Tabulating SDGs. Own elaboration adapted from [98].
Sustainability 12 09320 g009
Figure 10. Strategic plan. Own elaboration adapted from [98].
Figure 10. Strategic plan. Own elaboration adapted from [98].
Sustainability 12 09320 g010
Table 1. Ranking of organizations by number of documents.
Table 1. Ranking of organizations by number of documents.
PositionOrganizationNumber of Documents
1University of Ottawa6
2Sejong University4
3Huazhong University Science & technology3
4University of Florence3
5Nanyang Technology University3
6Northeastern University3
7University of Thessaly3
8University of Málaga3
Table 2. Ranking of organizations by number of citations.
Table 2. Ranking of organizations by number of citations.
PositionOrganizationCitations
1La Trobe University93
2University of Ottawa88
3Imperial College of London65
4King Abdulaziz University57
5Canadian University of Dubai45
6Lulea University Technology44
7University of Edinburgh44
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

De Las Heras, A.; Luque-Sendra, A.; Zamora-Polo, F. Machine Learning Technologies for Sustainability in Smart Cities in the Post-COVID Era. Sustainability 2020, 12, 9320. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12229320

AMA Style

De Las Heras A, Luque-Sendra A, Zamora-Polo F. Machine Learning Technologies for Sustainability in Smart Cities in the Post-COVID Era. Sustainability. 2020; 12(22):9320. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12229320

Chicago/Turabian Style

De Las Heras, Ana, Amalia Luque-Sendra, and Francisco Zamora-Polo. 2020. "Machine Learning Technologies for Sustainability in Smart Cities in the Post-COVID Era" Sustainability 12, no. 22: 9320. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12229320

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop