Preserving the Culture of Jeju Haenyeo (Women Divers) as a Sustainable Tourism Resource
Abstract
:1. Introduction
2. Literature Review
2.1. Contingent Valuation
2.2. The Culture of Jeju Haenyeo as an Intangible Cultural Heritage
3. Methods
3.1. Model Specifications
3.2. Logit Model and Estimation of Willingness to Pay (WTP)
3.3. Research Design
3.3.1. Hypothetical Scenario
The culture of Jeju Haenyeo is a symbol of Jeju Island’s spirit, a marine cultural heritage that represents the identity of a coastal Korean village. The culture has been passed down for generations and has been recognized for its value as a historical, communal, and academic cultural resource. The Jeju Haenyeo culture was listed on UNESCO’s Intangible Cultural Heritage list in November 2016. However, the traditional culture is slowly disappearing in a rapidly changing cultural environment, and the rapid decline in the number of Haenyeo, due to aging, poses a direct threat to the transmission of the tradition; there is no real solution. Raising funds would allow for the continuous preservation of the culture of Jeju Haenyeo.
3.3.2. Payment Vehicle
- Q1. Would you pay (A) per month to preserve the Jeju Haenyeo culture?
- ① Yes ② No
- Q2. If you answered yes to Q1, would you agree to electronic invoicing of your donation amount?
- ① Yes ② No
- Q3. If you answered yes to Q2, would you be willing to give me your e-mail address and name to deliver the electronic bill?
- ① Yes ② No
4. Data Collection
5. Results
5.1. Demographic Characteristics
5.2. Measuring the Value of Preserving the Haenyeo Culture
5.3. Logit Model Estimation Results
5.4. Estimating Value through Truncated Mean WTP
6. Conclusions and Implications
Author Contributions
Funding
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Cellini, R. Is UNESCO recognition effective in fostering tourism? A comment on Yang, Lin and Han. Tour. Manag. 2011, 32, 452–454. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chhabra, D. Sustainable Marketing of Cultural and Heritage Tourism; Routledge: Abingdon, UK, 2010. [Google Scholar]
- Choi, H.C.; Turk, E.S. Sustainability indicators for managing community tourism. In Quality-of-Life Community Indicators for Parks, Recreation and Tourism Management; Springer: Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 2011; pp. 115–140. [Google Scholar]
- Liu, Z. Sustainable tourism development: A critique. J. Sustain. Tour. 2003, 11, 459–475. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Chhabra, D.; Healy, R.; Sills, E. Staged authenticity and heritage tourism. Ann. Tour. Res. 2003, 30, 702–719. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Esfehani, M.H.; Albrecht, J.N. Roles of intangible cultural heritage in tourism in natural protected areas. J. Herit. Tour. 2018, 13, 15–29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- González, M.V. Intangible heritage tourism and identity. Tour. Manag. 2008, 29, 807–810. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Blake, J. Developing a New Standard-Setting Instrument for the Safeguarding of Intangible Cultural Heritage: Elements for Consideration; Unesco: Paris, France, 2001. [Google Scholar]
- Labadi, S. UNESCO, Cultural Heritage, and Outstanding Universal Value: Value-Based Analyses of the World Heritage and Intangible Cultural Heritage Conventions; Rowman & Littlefield: Lanham, MA, USA, 2013. [Google Scholar]
- Vecco, M. A definition of cultural heritage: From the tangible to the intangible. J. Cult. Herit. 2010, 11, 321–324. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lee, J.Y.; Lee, H.H. Korean women divers ‘Haenyeo’: Bathing suits and acclimatization to cold. J. Hum. Environ. Syst. 2014, 17, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Choi, Y.J.; Lee, W.S.; Moon, J.; Kim, K.B. The value of preserving endangered folk games using the contingent valuation method. Curr. Issues Tour. 2020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yolal, M.; Gursoy, D.; Uysal, M.; Kim, H.L.; Karacaoğlu, S. Impacts of festivals and events on residents’ well-being. Ann. Tour. Res. 2016, 61, 1–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hwang, Y.T.; Moon, J.; Lee, W.S.; Kim, S.A.; Kim, J. Evaluation of firefly as a tourist attraction and resource using contingent valuation method based on a new environmental paradigm. J. Qual. Assur. Hosp. Tour. 2020, 21, 320–336. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mitchell, R.C.; Carson, R.T. Using Surveys to Value Public Goods: The Contingent Valuation Method. Resources for the Future; RFF Press: Washington, DC, USA, 1989. [Google Scholar]
- Hanemann, M.; Loomis, J.; Kanninen, B. Statistical efficiency of double-bounded dichotomous choice contingent valuation. Am. J. Agric. Econ. 1991, 73, 1255–1263. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Carson, R.T.; Mitchell, R.C. The value of clean water: The public’s willingness to pay for boatable, fishable, and swimmable quality water. Water Resour. Res. 1993, 29, 2445–2454. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Lee, C.K.; Han, S.Y. Estimating the use and preservation values of national parks’ tourism resources using a contingent valuation method. Tour. Manag. 2002, 23, 531–540. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lee, W.S.; Lee, C.K.; Yoon, Y.; Kim, J. Research note: Exaggeration bias-corrected contingent valuation method: The case of Olle Trail. Tour. Econ. 2015, 21, 1323–1330. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bishop, R.C.; Heberlein, T.A. Measuring values of extramarket goods: Are indirect measures biased? Am. J. Agric. Econ. 1979, 61, 926–930. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Hanemann, W.M. Welfare evaluations in contingent valuation experiments with discrete responses. Am. J. Agric. Econ. 1984, 66, 332–341. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Choi, Y.; Lee, W.S.; Lee, C.K.; Dattilo, J. Valuation of mudflats in nature-based tourism: Inclusion of perceived value of festival experiences. Tour. Econ. 2015, 21, 833–851. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Harrison, G.W.; Rutström, E.E. Experimental evidence on the existence of hypothetical bias in value elicitation methods. In Handbook of Experimental Economics Results; North Holland: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2008; Volume 1, pp. 752–767. [Google Scholar]
- Lee, W.S.; Graefe, A.R.; Hwang, D. Willingness to pay for an ecological park experience. Asia Pac. J. Tour. Res. 2013, 18, 288–302. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lee, W.S. A Study on the Value of Preserving a Parasitic Volcanic Sieve as a Tourism Good for Sustainable Management: Using the Contingent Valuation Method. Sustainability 2020, 12, 2825. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Lenzerini, F. Intangible cultural heritage: The living culture of peoples. Eur. J. Int. Law 2011, 22, 101–120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Baghli, S.A. The convention for the safeguarding of the intangible cultural heritage and new perspectives for the museum. ICOM News Mus. Intang. Herit. 2004, 57, 15–17. [Google Scholar]
- Alberti, F.G.; Giusti, J.D. Cultural heritage, tourism and regional competitiveness: The Motor Valley cluster. City Cult. Soc. 2012, 3, 261–273. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Du Cros, H. A new model to assist in planning for sustainable cultural heritage tourism. Int. J. Tour. Res. 2001, 3, 165–170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cuccia, T.; Guccio, C.; Rizzo, I. The effects of UNESCO World Heritage List inscription on tourism destinations performance in Italian regions. Econ. Model. 2016, 53, 494–508. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ryan, C.; Chaozhi, Z.; Zeng, D. The impacts of tourism at a UNESCO heritage site in China—A need for a meta-narrative? The case of the Kaiping Diaolou. J. Sustain. Tour. 2011, 19, 747–765. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- World Tourism Organization. Tourism and Intangible Cultural Heritage; World Tourism Organization: Madrid, Spain, 2012. [Google Scholar]
- García-Almeida, D.J. Knowledge transfer processes in the authenticity of the intangible cultural heritage in tourism destination competitiveness. J. Herit. Tour. 2019, 14, 409–421. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Park, S.M.D.; Giudici, E.; Melis, C.; Dessì, S.; Ramos, B.F.P.G. Is intangible cultural heritage able to promote sustainability in tourism? Int. J. Qual. Serv. Sci. 2013, 5, 101–114. [Google Scholar]
- Smith, M.K. Issues in Cultural Tourism Studies; Routledge: Abingdon, UK, 2009. [Google Scholar]
- Wray, K.; Espiner, S.; Perkins, H.C. Cultural clash: Interpreting established use and new tourism activities in protected natural areas. Scand. J. Hosp. Tour. 2010, 10, 272–290. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kirshenblatt-Gimblett, B. Folklore’s crisis. J. Am. Folk. 1998, 111, 281–327. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kim, S.; Whitford, M.; Arcodia, C. Development of intangible cultural heritage as a sustainable tourism resource: The intangible cultural heritage practitioners’ perspectives. J. Herit. Tour. 2019, 14, 422–435. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yoo, J.H.; Jung, Y.K. A Study on the Applications of ICT/IoT for Jeju Haenyeo Culture, an UNESCO Intangible Cultural Heritage. J. Inf. Technol. Serv. 2017, 16, 213–222. [Google Scholar]
- Manski, C.F. The structure of random utility models. Theory Decis. 1977, 8, 229–254. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lee, C.K.; Mjelde, J.W. Valuation of ecotourism resources using a contingent valuation method: The case of the Korean DMZ. Ecol. Econ. 2007, 63, 511–520. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Duffield, J.W.; Patterson, D.A. Inference and optimal design for a welfare measure in dichotomous choice contingent valuation. Land Econ. 1991, 67, 225–239. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bateman, I.J.; Langford, I.H.; Turner, R.K.; Willis, K.G.; Garrod, G.D. Elicitation and truncation effects in contingent valuation studies. Ecol. Econ. 1995, 12, 161–179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sellar, C.; Chavas, J.P.; Stoll, J.R. Specification of the logit model: The case of valuation of nonmarket goods. J. Environ. Econ. Manag. 1986, 13, 382–390. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Báez, A.; Herrero, L.C. Using contingent valuation and cost-benefit analysis to design a policy for restoring cultural heritage. J. Cult. Herit. 2012, 13, 235–245. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Park, S.Y.; Lee, W.S. Valuation of the Jidong Mural Art Alley Using the Contingent Valuation Method: An Application of Nostalgia. J. Tour. Sci. 2017, 41, 45–62. [Google Scholar]
- You, W.H.; Seo, S.J.; Choi, B.K. A Study of Jeju Haenyeo’s (Women Diver) Awareness on Self, Community and UNESCO Intangible Cultural Heritage of Humanity (ICH) Designation. J. Korean Inst. Tradit. Landsc. Archit. 2018, 36, 89–96. [Google Scholar]
# Of Respondents (%) | ||
---|---|---|
Gender | Male | 139 (52.5) |
Female | 126 (47.5) | |
Age | 20s | 86 (32.2) |
30s | 67 (25.3) | |
40s | 74 (27.9) | |
50s | 25 (9.4) | |
60s or over | 13 (4.9) | |
Monthly household income (KRW) | Less than~1,000,000 | 51 (19.0) |
1,000,000~1,999,999 | 36 (13.6) | |
2,000,000~2,999,999 | 57 (21.5) | |
3,000,000~3,999,999 | 39 (14.7) | |
4,000,000~4,999,999 | 39 (14.7) | |
5,000,000 or over | 43 (16.2) | |
Academic background | Middle school or less | 6 (2.3) |
High school or less | 74 (27.9) | |
University or college | 157 (59.2) | |
Graduate school or over | 28 (10.6) |
Bid Amount (KRW: South Korean Won) | Sample | WTP1 | WTP2 | WTP3 | Final WTP | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Yes | No | Yes % | Yes | No | Yes % | Yes | No | Yes % | Yes | No | Yes % | ||
100 | 30 | 29 | 1 | 96.7 | 28 | 2 | 93.3 | 27 | 3 | 90 | 27 | 3 | 90 |
500 | 30 | 26 | 4 | 86.7 | 19 | 11 | 63.3 | 17 | 13 | 56.7 | 17 | 13 | 56.7 |
1000 | 30 | 23 | 7 | 76.7 | 22 | 8 | 73.3 | 17 | 13 | 56.7 | 17 | 13 | 56.7 |
3000 | 29 | 21 | 8 | 72.4 | 19 | 10 | 65.5 | 16 | 13 | 55.2 | 13 | 16 | 44.8 |
5000 | 30 | 20 | 10 | 66.7 | 16 | 14 | 53.3 | 13 | 17 | 43.3 | 12 | 18 | 40 |
10,000 | 29 | 14 | 15 | 48.3 | 11 | 18 | 37.9 | 9 | 20 | 31 | 9 | 20 | 31 |
30,000 | 30 | 11 | 19 | 36.7 | 11 | 19 | 36.7 | 6 | 24 | 20 | 6 | 24 | 20 |
50,000 | 29 | 8 | 21 | 27.6 | 7 | 22 | 24.1 | 5 | 24 | 17.2 | 4 | 25 | 13.8 |
100,000 | 28 | 4 | 24 | 14.3 | 1 | 27 | 3.6 | 1 | 27 | 3.6 | 1 | 27 | 3.6 |
Total | 265 | 156 | 109 | 58.9 | 134 | 131 | 50.6 | 111 | 154 | 41.9 | 106 | 159 | 40 |
Variable | Coefficient | Standard Error | Wald | Significance | Exp (β) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Bid | −0.000 | 0.000 | 24.306 | 0.000 | 0.999 |
Gender | 0.687 | 0.297 | 5.324 | 0.021 | 1.988 |
Age | 0.524 | 0.136 | 14.695 | 0.000 | 1.689 |
Monthly household income | 0.068 | 0.092 | 0.549 | 0.459 | 1.070 |
Academic background | 0.116 | 0.238 | 0.239 | 0.625 | 1.123 |
Constant | −2.539 | 0.916 | 7.675 | 0.000 | 0.078 |
−2 log likelihood: 280.369 Nagelkerke : 0.338 | Cox & Snell R2: 0.250 Percent of correct prediction: 70.9% |
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. |
© 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Park, S.; Chung, N.; Lee, W.S. Preserving the Culture of Jeju Haenyeo (Women Divers) as a Sustainable Tourism Resource. Sustainability 2020, 12, 10564. https://doi.org/10.3390/su122410564
Park S, Chung N, Lee WS. Preserving the Culture of Jeju Haenyeo (Women Divers) as a Sustainable Tourism Resource. Sustainability. 2020; 12(24):10564. https://doi.org/10.3390/su122410564
Chicago/Turabian StylePark, Sunwoo, Namho Chung, and Won Seok Lee. 2020. "Preserving the Culture of Jeju Haenyeo (Women Divers) as a Sustainable Tourism Resource" Sustainability 12, no. 24: 10564. https://doi.org/10.3390/su122410564
APA StylePark, S., Chung, N., & Lee, W. S. (2020). Preserving the Culture of Jeju Haenyeo (Women Divers) as a Sustainable Tourism Resource. Sustainability, 12(24), 10564. https://doi.org/10.3390/su122410564