Next Article in Journal
A Sustainable Niche Market: How Does Honey Behave?
Previous Article in Journal
Situating Indigenous Resilience: Climate Change and Tayal’s “Millet Ark” Action in Taiwan
Previous Article in Special Issue
New Challenges for Historic Gardens’ Restoration: A Holistic Approach for the Royal Park of Moncalieri Castle (Turin Metropolitan Area, Italy)
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

A Systematic Literature Review of Historic Garden Management and Its Economic Aspects

by
Cassandra Funsten
,
Valeria Borsellino
* and
Emanuele Schimmenti
Department of Agricultural, Food and Forest Sciences, Università degli Studi di Palermo, 90128 Palermo, Italy
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Sustainability 2020, 12(24), 10679; https://doi.org/10.3390/su122410679
Submission received: 31 October 2020 / Revised: 14 December 2020 / Accepted: 18 December 2020 / Published: 21 December 2020

Abstract

Historic gardens are important parts of humanity’s built heritage within the designed landscape, providing many environmental, economic and socio-cultural benefits. Management is a key part of their conservation, perhaps the most difficult because it is costly, must be continual, and requires a skilled workforce. This systematic review looks at the literature addressing historic garden management, with special attention regarding the social, economic and environmental aspects of sustainability. Academic studies on this subject come from many different disciplines, making it both stimulating and fragmented. It is now time to consolidate these interdisciplinary efforts into a clear vision, including a framework of key themes and research methods so as to better coordinate efforts and make the information and innovation generated more accessible to the garden managers “in the trenches”. With this aim, reviewed studies are classified according to 10 criteria: supply or demand orientation; management phase involved; primary sustainability processes addressed; geographic criteria; number of sites covered; policy documents referred to; kind of data collected; study methods employed; possibility of bias specifically regarding historic gardens; garden use. An analysis of these criteria shows that historic garden management literature focuses on describing the gardens themselves, with few studies interested in the people supporting them. Future research should follow recent policy documents’ lead and pay more attention to community value and involvement.
Keywords: historic garden types; social, economic and environmental sustainability; urban landscape; heritage management; heritage value assessment; conservation planning; conservation policy; interdisciplinary approaches historic garden types; social, economic and environmental sustainability; urban landscape; heritage management; heritage value assessment; conservation planning; conservation policy; interdisciplinary approaches

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Funsten, C.; Borsellino, V.; Schimmenti, E. A Systematic Literature Review of Historic Garden Management and Its Economic Aspects. Sustainability 2020, 12, 10679. https://doi.org/10.3390/su122410679

AMA Style

Funsten C, Borsellino V, Schimmenti E. A Systematic Literature Review of Historic Garden Management and Its Economic Aspects. Sustainability. 2020; 12(24):10679. https://doi.org/10.3390/su122410679

Chicago/Turabian Style

Funsten, Cassandra, Valeria Borsellino, and Emanuele Schimmenti. 2020. "A Systematic Literature Review of Historic Garden Management and Its Economic Aspects" Sustainability 12, no. 24: 10679. https://doi.org/10.3390/su122410679

APA Style

Funsten, C., Borsellino, V., & Schimmenti, E. (2020). A Systematic Literature Review of Historic Garden Management and Its Economic Aspects. Sustainability, 12(24), 10679. https://doi.org/10.3390/su122410679

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop