Urban Sprawl Risk Delimitation: The Concept for Spatial Planning Policy in Poland
Abstract
:1. Introduction
2. Current State of Knowledge
- low building density;
- lack of spatial continuity between existing buildings;
- lack of concentration of buildings in a relatively small area;
- no grouping of buildings into compact settlements;
- spatial decentralization associated with large building distances from the city center;
- polynuclearity reflecting the multitude of settlements;
- lack of functional differentiation of land use;
- lack of proximity, i.e., proximity of functionally different types of land.
- Leaving for work to the FUA core;
- Migration (registration) from the FUA core;
- Share of persons employed in non-agricultural occupations;
- Intensity of economic entities (in relation to the population);
- Share of business entities belonging to higher-order services in the total number of entities;
- Population density (excluding forests and waters);
- Newly built housing in relation to the population.
- Recommendations of the Ministry of Regional Development of Poland (the FUAs of these cities: Białystok, Gorzów Wielkopolski, Lublin, Olsztyn, Rzeszów, Zielona Góra and Wrocław);
- Strategic studies of regions (the FUAs of the Central Subregion and Łódź);
- Prior cooperation of communes (the FUAs of Trójmiasto, Poznań and Szczecin);
- Expertise (the FUAs of Bydgosko-Toruński and Kielce);
- The decision of the ITI association (the FUAs of Kraków, Opole and Warszawa).
3. Materials and Methods
3.1. The Maximum Research Range
3.2. Urban Sprawl Possibility
3.2.1. Settlement Structure
3.2.2. Migration Processes
3.2.3. Spatial Policy Efficiency
3.2.4. Data, Techniques and Criteria Used
4. Results
5. Discussion
6. Conclusions
- -
- universality of the method—caused by the inclusion of statistical data that is collected in most countries. In addition, the methodology is not complicated in the field of computational work, which allows it to be used also by public administration employees dealing with the issues of broadly understood spatial management. The method makes it possible to determine the phenomenon within the administrative boundaries of the unit, giving the opportunity to modify, for example, local spatial policy threatened by the phenomenon of urban sprawl. Furthermore, it can be useful when determining integrated development strategies, e.g., for metropolitan areas, in the field of comprehensive assessment of occurring phenomena in space.
- -
- the use of medium-term indexes of chain dynamics and a moving average—enabling “smoothing” behavior in variable time. This allows for objective identification of the direction of changes and assessment of the attributes assigned to urban sprawl.
- -
- considering the method the efficiency of spatial policy as a necessary condition for identifying urban sprawl. Development processes take place in various spatial forms. Hence, some areas are not built up, leaving empty spaces between developments. This creates an inconsistent spatial structure attributed to urban sprawl. However, such a structure, when it is the implementation of a plan, in which the next planned investments will fill the vacant areas, cannot be defined as uncontrolled. In fact, it takes part in the planned process. On the other hand, a situation may arise in which the same spatial structure was created as the sum of individual investments carried out by various entities, in the absence of location coordination by public authorities. This is often the case in Poland in the absence of spatial plans in the commune. In this situation, we are dealing with inefficient spatial policy, resulting in the creation of a spatial structure with attributes connected to urban sprawl. Therefore, the strength of the proposed method is to take into account the assessment of spatial policy efficiency in coordinating spatial development. In addition, the method uses information contained in, among other things, planning documents, and these are developed in a variety of planning systems, including the Germanic, Scandinavian, Napoleonic and British systems.
- -
- the use of data on migration from cities that do not clearly indicate the city from which the population migrates. In the case of Poland, this problem is compounded by the polycentric structure of Poland, where many capitals of the regions are located close to each other. This phenomenon is particularly observed in the southern part of Poland. As a result, in the case of communes remote from the city, we do not know exactly whether the migration is from the capital of one or another nearby city. Therefore, this method limitation was tried to be amortized by adopting the maximum range of the phenomenon (stage 1). It seems that the application of the method to other countries with a polycentric structure of the country and small distances between cities must obligatorily include setting the maximum range of research, while in monocentric countries or those with large distances between cities, this stage may be optional.
- -
- the problem of spatial policy efficiency assessment. In the case of the proposed method, data collected in Poland was used, while discussing that administrative decisions document the lack of spatial policy, as they are issued in the absence of spatial plans in the commune. The administrative decision is therefore individual to the investment and does not take into account a coherent vision of territory development. Therefore, one cannot say that it is an instrument of policy efficiency, which is why it was treated as a de-stimulant in this research. However, an instrument of efficiency may be a spatial plan, and the higher the coverage of a commune’s area with plans, the more coherent and thought out local spatial policy becomes. Therefore, if the method is used in other countries, the approach to quantifying the efficiency of spatial policy must be individually adopted.
- -
- the dominance of quantitative techniques, which in full implementation of research outside Poland may not always result in correct evaluation. During the internationalization of the method, the researcher will be forced to consider the specific local conditions of the studied country.
Author Contributions
Funding
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Parysek, J. Wprowadzenie do Gospodarki Przestrzennej; UAM: Poznań, Poland, 2007; ISBN 978-83-2321-808-1. [Google Scholar]
- Górka, A. Threats to Rural Landscape and Its Protection in Poland. Environments 2018, 5, 109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Nowacka, E. Władza Samorządu Lokalnego, 1st ed.; LexisNexis: Warsaw, Poland, 2012; ISBN 978-83-7806-672-9. [Google Scholar]
- Domański, R. Gospodarka Przestrzenna: Podstawy Teoretyczne; PWN: Warsaw, Poland, 2006; ISBN 978-83-0114-800-3. [Google Scholar]
- Korenik, S.; Słodczyk, J. Podstawy Gospodarki Przestrzennej—Wybrane Aspekty, Wyd.; Wrocław University of Economics: Wrocław, Poland, 2005. [Google Scholar]
- Hołuj, A. Internalizacja ekonomicznych efektów zewnętrznych na obszarach dotkniętych procesem urban sprawl: Przykład Krakowskiego Obszaru Metropolitalnego. Biuletyn Polskiej Akademii Nauk. Komitet Przestrzennego Zagospodarowania Kraju 2018, 270, 67–81. [Google Scholar]
- Hołuj, A.; Lityński, P. Conditions and Improvements Impacting Urban Sprawl in Poland. Studia Regionalia 2015, 43. [Google Scholar]
- Wassmer, R.W. An Economic Perspective on Urban Sprawl: With an Application to the American West and a Test of the Efficacy of Urban Growth Boundaries; California State University of Research: Long Beach, CA, USA, 2002; p. 3. [Google Scholar]
- Nechyba, T.J.; Walsh, R.P. Urban Sprawl. J. Econ. Perspect. 2004, 18, 177–200. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Barnes, K.B.; Morgan, J.M.; Roberge, M.C.; Lowe, S. Sprawl Development: Its Patterns, Consequences, and Measurement; Towson University: Baltimore, MD, USA, 2001. [Google Scholar]
- Wilson, E.H.; Hurd, J.D.; Civco, D.L.; Prisloe, S.; Arnold, C. Development of a geospatial model to quantify, describe and map urban growth. Remote Sens. Environ. 2003, 86, 275–285. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Roca, J.; Burnsa, M.C.; Carreras, J.M. Monitoring urban sprawl around Barcelona’s metropolitan area with the aid of satellite imagery. In Proceedings of the Geo-Imagery Bridging Continents XXth ISPRS Congress, Istanbul, Turkey, 12–23 July 2004. [Google Scholar]
- Sudhira, H.S.; Ramachandra, T.V. Characterising urban sprawl from remote sensing data and using landscape metrics. In Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Computers in Urban Planning and Urban Management, Iguassu Falls, Brazil, 11–13 July 2007. [Google Scholar]
- Angel, S.; Parent, J.; Civco, D. Urban sprawl metrics: An analysis of global urban expansion using GIS. In Proceedings of the ASPRS 2007 Annual Conference, Tampa, FL, USA, 7–11 May 2007. [Google Scholar]
- Bullard, D.R.; Johnson, G.S.; Torres, A.O. Sprawl City: Race, Politics and Planning in Atlanta; Island Press: Washington, DC, USA, 2000; ISBN 978-1559637909. [Google Scholar]
- Duany, A.; Plater-Zyberk, E.; Speck, J. Suburban Nation: The Rise of Sprawl and the Decline of the American Dream; North Point Press: New York, NY, USA, 2000; ISBN 978-0865477506. [Google Scholar]
- Phelps, N.A.; Parsons, N.; Ballas, D.; Dowling, A. Post-Suburban Europe: Planning and Politics at the Margins of Europe’s Capital Cities; Palgrave Macmillan: New York, NY, USA, 2006; ISBN 978-0-230-00212-8. [Google Scholar]
- Kyvelou, S.S.; Gourgiotis, A. Landscape as Connecting Link of Nature and Culture: Spatial Planning Policy Implications in Greece. Urban Sci. 2019, 3, 81. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Galster, G.; Hanson, R.; Wolman, H.; Coleman, S.; Freihage, J. Wrestling sprawl to the ground: Defining and measuring an elusive concept. Hous. Policy Debate 2001, 12, 681–717. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bhatta, B. Analysis of Urban Growth and Sprawl from Remote Sensing Data. In Advances in Geographical Information Science; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2010; ISBN 978-3-642-05299-6. [Google Scholar]
- Arribas-Bel, D.; Nijkamp, P.; Scholten, H. MultiDimensional Urban Sprawl in Europe: A Self-Organizing Map Approach. In Proceedings of the 50th Congress of the European Regional Science Association: Sustainable Regional Growth and Development in the Creative Knowledge Economy, Jonkoping, Sweden, 19–23 August 2010. [Google Scholar]
- Perrsky, J.; Wiewel, J. Urban Decentralization, Suburbanization, and Sprawl: An Equity Perspective. In Urban Economics and Planning; Brooks, N., Donaghy, K., Knaap, G.J., Eds.; Oxford University Press: New York, NY, USA, 2012; ISBN 978-0195380620. [Google Scholar]
- Lisowski, A.; Grochowski, M. Procesy Suburbanizacji. Uwarunkowania, Formy, Konsekwencje; 240/2009; Biuletyn KPZK: Warsaw, Poland, 2009; pp. 216–280. [Google Scholar]
- Herold, M.; Hemphill, J.; Dietzel, C.; Clarke, K.C. Remote sensing derived mapping to support urban growth theory. In Proceedings of the ISPRS Joint Conference 3rd International Symposium Remote Sensing and Data Fusion Over Urban Areas, and 5th International Symposium Remote Sensing of Urban Areas (URS 2005), Tempe, AZ, USA, 14–16 March 2005. [Google Scholar]
- Lowry, J.H.; Lowry, M.B. Comparing spatial metrics that quantify urban form. Comput. Environ. Urban Syst. 2014, 44, 59–67. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nedovic-Budic, Z.; Knaap, G.J.; Shahumyan, H.; Wiliams, B.; Slaev, A. Measuring urban form at community scale: Case study of Dublin. Cities 2016, 55, 148–164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hamidi, S.; Ewing, R. A longitudinal study of changes in urban sprawl between 2000 and 2010 in the United States. Landsc. Urban Plan. 2014, 128, 72–82. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fulton, W.; Pendall, R.; Nguyen, M.; Harrison, A. Who Sprawls Most: How Growth Patterns Differ across the United States; The Brookings Institution: Washington, DC, USA, 2001. [Google Scholar]
- Kahn, M. Does sprawl reduce the black/white housing consumption gap? Hous. Policy Debate 2001, 12, 77–86. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lopez, R.; Hynes, H.P. Sprawl in the 1990s: Measurement, distribution and trends. Urban Aff. Rev. 2003, 38, 325–355. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Ewing, R.; Pendall, R.; Chen, D. Measuring Sprawl and Its Impact; Smart Growth America: Washington, DC, USA, 2002. [Google Scholar]
- Wolman, H.; Galster, G.; Hanson, R.; Ratcliffe, M.; Furdell, K.; Sarzyński, A. The Fundamental Challenge in Measuring Sprawl: Which Land Should Be Considered? Prof. Geogr. 2005, 57, 94–105. [Google Scholar]
- Dziewoński, K.; Kosiński, L. Rozmieszczenie ludności w Polsce w XX w. Przegląd Geograficzny 1964, 36, 3–36. [Google Scholar]
- Iwanicka-Lyra, E. Delimitacja aglomeracji wielkomiejskich w Polsce. In Prace Geograficzne; IGiZP PAN: Warsaw, Poland, 1969; p. 76. [Google Scholar]
- Leszczycki, S.; Eberhardt, P.; Heřman, S. Aglomeracje miejsko-przemysłowe w Polsce 1966–2000. In Biuletyn; KPZK PAN: Warsaw, Poland, 1967; p. 67. [Google Scholar]
- Gontarski, Z. Delimitacja obszarów metropolitalnych w Polsce. In Statystyka Terenowa; GUS: Warsaw, Poland, 1972; Volume 8, pp. 55–63. [Google Scholar]
- Gontarski, Z. Obszary Metropolitalne w Polsce; Biuletyn KPZK PAN: Warsaw, Poland, 1982; Volume 109, pp. 25–41. [Google Scholar]
- Potrykowska, A. Funkcjonalne regiony miejskie w krajowym systemie osadniczym. In WspółCzesne Przemiany Regionalnych Systemów Osadniczych w Polsce; Prace Geograficzne, 152; Korcelli, P., Gawryszewski, A., Eds.; Instytut Geografii i Przestrzennego Zagospodarowania: Warsaw, Poland, 1989; pp. 55–76. [Google Scholar]
- Swianiewicz, P.; Klimska, K. Społeczne i polityczne zróżnicowanie aglomeracji w Polsce—Waniliowe centrum, mozaika przedmieść. Prace Studia Geograficzne 2005, 35, 45–70. [Google Scholar]
- Smętkowski, M. Delimitacja obszarów metropolitalnych—Nowe spojrzenie. In Rozwój, Region, Przestrzeń; Gorzelak, G., Tucholska, A., Eds.; Ministerstwo Rozwoju Regionalnego (EUROREG): Warsaw, Poland, 2007; pp. 215–233. [Google Scholar]
- Smętkowski, M.; Jałowiecki, B.; Gorzelak, G. Obszary Metropolitalne w Polsce: Problemy Rozwojowe i Delimitacja; Raporty i Analizy EUROREG 1/2009; EUROPEG: Warsaw, Poland, 2009. [Google Scholar]
- Ratzel, F. Die Gesetze des raumlichen Wachstums der Staaten. Petermanns Mitteilungen 1896, 42, 97–107. [Google Scholar]
- Hoover, E.M. The Location of Economic Activity; McGraw-Hill: New York, NY, USA, 1948. [Google Scholar]
- Friedman, J.; Alonso, W. Regional Development and Planning; MIT Press: Cambridge, UK, 1966. [Google Scholar]
- Perroux, F. Note sur la notion de “pôle de croissance”. Econ. Appliquée 1955, 8, 307–316. [Google Scholar]
- Davin, L.E. O filozofii gospodarki regionalnej. Biuletyn KPZK PAN 1968, 48, 187–221. [Google Scholar]
- Klaassen, L. Area Economic and Social Redevelopment: Guidelines for Programmes; OECD: Paris, France, 1965. [Google Scholar]
- Grzeszczak, J. Koncepcje Polaryzacyjne w Przestrzennym Zagospodarowaniu Kraju. Na przykładzie Francji; Studia KPZK PAN: Warsaw, Poland, 1971; Volume 36, pp. 4–19. [Google Scholar]
- Berry, B.J.L.; Conkling, E.C.; Ray, D.M. The Geography of Economic Systems; Prentice-Hall, Inc.: Englewood Cliffs, NJ, USA, 1976. [Google Scholar]
- Winiarski, B. Polityka Regionalna; PWE: Warsaw, Poland, 1976. [Google Scholar]
- Kukliński, A. (Ed.) Diagnoza Stanu Gospodarki Przestrzennej Polski. Wstępne Wyniki Badań; Biuletyn KPZK PAN: Warsaw, Poland, 1983; Volume 123, Available online: http://www.euroreg.uw.edu.pl/dane/web_euroreg_publications_files/3433/18._wspczesne_problemy_gospodarki_przestrzennej_polski.pdf (accessed on 10 February 2020).
- Zagożdżon, A. Kilka uwag o obszarach problemowych. In Gospodarka Przestrzenna, Region, Lokalność, 1st ed.; Jałowiecki, B., Kukliński, A., Eds.; Biuletyn KPZK: Warsaw, Poland, 1988; Volume 138, pp. 137–147. [Google Scholar]
- Gorzelak, G. Rozwój Regionalny Polski w Warunkach Kryzysu i Reformy, Rozwój Regionalny—Rozwój Lokalny—Samorząd Terytorialny; UW 14; IGP: Warsaw, Poland, 1989. [Google Scholar]
- Churski, P.; Hauke, J. Obszary problemowe w Polsce w układzie jednostek NTS. In Możliwości i Ograniczenia Zastosowań Metod Badawczych w Geografii Społeczno-Ekonomicznej i Gospodarce Przestrzennej; Rogacki, H., Ed.; Bogucki Wydawnictwa Naukowe: Poznań, Poland, 2002; pp. 161–176. [Google Scholar]
- Bański, J. Typy ludnościowych obszarów problemowych. In Społeczne Problemy wsi, Studia Obszarów Wiejskich; Bański, J., Rydz, E., Eds.; Komisja Obszarów Wiejskich PTG: Warsaw, Poland, 2002; pp. 41–52. ISSN 1642-4689. [Google Scholar]
- Jadczyszyn, J. Regionalne zróżnicowanie obszarów problemowych rolnictwa (OPR) w Polsce. In Instytut Uprawy, Nawożenia i Gleboznawstwa w Puławach; 2009; Volume 163, ISBN 978-83-7562-041-2. Available online: http://opr.iung.pulawy.pl/publikacje/IU-163.pdf (accessed on 5 February 2020).
- Komornicki, T.; Śleszyński, P. Typologia obszarów wiejskich pod względem powiązań funkcjonalnych i relacji miasto-wieś. In Analiza Zróżnicowania i Perspektyw Rozwoju Obszarów Wiejskich w Polsce do 2015 Roku; Bański, J., Ed.; Studia Obszarów Wiejskich: Warsaw, Poland, 2009; pp. 9–37. [Google Scholar]
- Eberhardt, P. Studia nad problematyką delimitacji aglomeracji miejskich w Polsce. In Warsawa jako przedmiot badań w geografii społeczno-ekonomicznej, Prace Geograficzne; Węcławowicz, G., Ed.; IGiPZ PAN: Warsaw, Poland, 2002; pp. 55–64. [Google Scholar]
- Eberhardt, P.; Gontarski, Z.; Siemiński, J. Koncepcje delimitacji aglomeracji miejskich w Polsce. Biuletyn KPZK PAN 1973, 79, 187–217. [Google Scholar]
- Rykiel, Z. Koncepcje i delimitacje wielkomiejskich form osadniczych w Polsce. In Współczesne Formy Osadnictwa Miejskiego i ich Przemiany; XV Konwersatorium Wiedzy o Mieście; Jażdżewska, I., Ed.; Uniwersytet Łódzki, Łódzkie Towarzystwo Naukowe: Łódź, Poland, 2002; pp. 9–19. [Google Scholar]
- Markowski, T.; Marszał, T. Metropolie, Obszary Metropolitalne, Metropolizacja. Problemy i Pojęcia Podstawowe; KPZK PAN: Warsaw, Poland, 2006. [Google Scholar]
- Czyż, T. Koncepcja aglomeracji miejskiej i obszaru metropolitalnego w polskiej geografii i miast. In Aglomeracje Miejskie w Polsce na Przełomie XX i XXI Wieku; Problemy rozwoju, przekształceń strukturalnych i funkcjonowania; Maik, W., Ed.; Wyższa Szkoła Gospodarki w Bydgoszczy: Bydgoszcz, Poland, 2009; pp. 15–30. [Google Scholar]
- Korcelli, P. Obszary metropolitalne a funkcjonalne obszary miejskie. In Miasto. Księga Jubileuszowa w 70. Rocznicę Urodzin Profesora Stanisława Liszewskiego; Kaczmarek, S., Ed.; University of Lodz Press: Lodz, Poland, 2011; pp. 43–50. [Google Scholar]
- Śleszyński, P. Delimitacja Miejskich Obszarów Funkcjonalnych stolic województw. Przegląd Geogr. 2013, 85, 173–197. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Goerlich Gisbert, F.J.; Cantarino Martí, I.; Gielen, E. Clustering cities through urban metrics analysis. J. Urban Design 2017, 22, 689–708. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liang, J.; Li, F.; Mao, L. Review of the methods of delimitation for the spatial scope of urban agglomeration. In Proceedings of the 18th International Conference on Geoinformatics: GIScience in Change, Geoinformatics 2010, Beijing, China, 18–20 June 2010; pp. 18–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tellier, L.-N.; Gelb, J. An Urban Metric System based on space-economy: Foundations, and implementation. Reg. Sci. Policy Pract. 2018, 10, 145–160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Knaap, G.J.; Song, Y.; Ewing, R.; Clifton, K. Seeing the Elephant: Multidisciplinary Measure of Urban Sprawl. J. Plan. 2005, 1–46. Available online: https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/7881/d6145311eb3d2d64c333a4ffc6526df817d0.pdf (accessed on 5 February 2020).
- Glaeser, E.L.; Kahn, M.E. Sprawl and Urban Growth; NBER Working Paper Series No. 9733; Harvard Institute of Economic Research: Cambridge, MA, USA, 2003; Available online: http://www.econ.brown.edu/Faculty/henderson/sprawl.pdf (accessed on 5 February 2020).
- Lityński, P. The correlation between urban sprawl and the local economy in Poland. Urbani Izziv 2016, 27, 86–96. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Torrens, P.M.; Alberti, M. Measuring Sprawl (CASA Working Papers 27); Centre for Advanced Spatial Analysis (UCL): London, UK, 2000. [Google Scholar]
- Frenkel, A.; Ashkenazi, M. Measuring urban sprawl: How can we deal with it? Environ. Plan. B Plan. Design 2008, 35, 56–79. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Pieniążek, M.; Rogalińska, D. Suburbanizacja jako wyzwanie badawcze dla statystyki regionalnej. Studia i Materiały Miscellanea Oeconomicae 2015, 4, 197–206. [Google Scholar]
- Tellier, L.-N. Économie Spatiale: Rationalité Économique de l’espace Habité; Gaëtan, M., Ed.; 1985; ISBN 2-89105-501-2. Available online: https://www.erudit.org/fr/revues/cgq/1994-v38-n104-cgq2676/022445ar.pdf (accessed on 5 February 2020).
- Tellier, L.-N. Urban World History. An Economic and Geographical Perspective, 2nd ed.; Springer Nature: Basel, Switzerland, 2019; ISBN 978-3-030-24841-3. [Google Scholar]
- Tellier, L.-N. A Challenge for Regional Science: Revealing and Explaining the Global Spatial Logic of Economic Development. J. Reg. Sci. 1997, 76, 371–384. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tellier, L.-N.; Polanski, B. The Weber Problem: Frequency of Different Solution Types and Extension of Repulsive Forces and Dynamics Processes. J. Reg. Sci. 1989, 29, 387–405. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tellier, L.-N.; Vertefeuille, C. Understanding Spatial Inertia: Centre of Gravity, Population Densities, the Weber Problem and Gravity Potential. J. Reg. Sci. 1995, 35, 155–164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ottaviano, G.; Thisse, J.-F. New Economic Geography: What about the N? Environ. Plan. A 2005, 37, 1707–1725. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- O’Sullivan, A. Urban Economics; McGraw-Hill: New York, NY, USA, 2012; ISBN 978-0073511474. [Google Scholar]
- Śleszyński, P. Dostępność ekonomiczna miast wojewódzkich w świetle kosztów dojazdu samochodem osobowym. Prace Komisji Geografii Komunikacji PTG 2017, 20, 7–18. [Google Scholar]
- Nelson, A.C.; Duncan, J.B. Growth Management Principles and Practices; Planners Press: New York, NY, USA, 1995. [Google Scholar]
- Schneider, A.; Woodcock, C.E. Compact, dispersed, fragmented, extensive? A comparison of urban growth in twenty-five global cities using remotely sensed data, pattern metrics and census information. Urban Stud. 2008, 45, 659–692. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Heffner, K. Proces suburbanizacji a polityka miejska w Polsce. In Miasto–Region–Gospodarka w Badaniach Geograficznych. W Stulecie Urodzin Profesora Ludwika Straszewicza; Marszał, T., Ed.; Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Łódzkiego: Łódź, Poland, 2016. [Google Scholar]
- Lang, R.E. Office Sprawl: The Evolving Geography of Business; Brookings Institution: Washington, DC, USA, 2000. [Google Scholar]
- Glaeser, E.L.; Kolko, J.; Saiz, A. Consumer city. J. Econ. Geogr. 2001, 1, 27–50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Crane, R.; Chatman, D.G. Traffic and Sprawl: Evidence from US Commuting from 1985-1997; University of Southern California: Los Angeles, CA, USA, 2003; Volume 6. [Google Scholar]
- Lavalle, C.; Demicheli, L.; Kasanko, M.; McCormick, N.; Barredo, J.; Turchini, M.; Caetano, M. Towards an Urban Atlas: Assessment of Spatial Data on 25; Environmental Issue Report; European Environment Agency: Copenhagen, Denmark, 2002; Available online: http://projects.mcrit.com/esponfutures/documents/European%20Studies/EEA%20(2002)%20Towards%20an%20urban%20atlas,%20Assessment%20of%20spatial%20data.pdf (accessed on 5 February 2020).
- Pumain, D. Urban sprawl: Is there a French case. In Urban Sprawl in Western Europe and the United States; Asghate: Aldershot, UK, 2004; pp. 137–157. [Google Scholar]
- Lityński, P.; Hołuj, A. Urban sprawl costs: The valuation of households’ losses in Poland. J. Settl. Spat. Plan. 2017, 8, 11–35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lityński, P.; Zotic, V.; Hołuj, A. Polish urban sprawl. An economic perspective. J. Settl. Spat. Plan. 2015, 6, 95–105. [Google Scholar]
- Diekman, A.; Jann, B. Benford’s Law and Fraud Detection. Facts and Legends. Ger. Econ. Rev. 2010, 11, 397–401. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Bul, R.; Walaszek, M. Dojazdy do pracy i szkół jako podstawowe kryterium delimitacji obszarów funkcjonalnych miast. Rozwój Regionalny Polityka Regionalna 2015, 29, 119–138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Kryteria Delimitacji Miejskich Obszarów Funkcjonalnych Ośrodków Wojewódzkich; Ministerstwo Rozwoju Regionalnego: Warsaw, Poland, 2013.
- Manganelli, B.; Murgante, B.; Saganeiti, L. The Social Cost of Urban Sprinkling. Sustainability 2020, 12, 2236. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Hołuj, D.; Hołuj, A. Mechanisms of densification of the city in the neoliberal economy—A case study: The surroundings of the eastern part of the former airport runway Rakowice-Czyżyny in Cracow. Bull. Geogr. Socioecon. Ser. 2015, 27, 81–93. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Hołuj, A. Urban or the expansion of the metropolitan core? Analysis of the Cracow Metropolitan Area. In Funkcjonalne Miasto w Teorii i Praktyce na Przykładzie Krakowa i Krakowskiego Obszaru Metropolitalnego; Kudłacz, T., Musiał-Malago, M., Eds.; Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Ekonomicznego w Krakowie: Krakow, Poland, 2018; pp. 74–83. [Google Scholar]
- Newman, P.; Thornley, A. Urban Planning in Europe: International Competition, National Systems, and Planning Projects; Routledge: London, UK, 1996; ISBN 0-203-73618-4. [Google Scholar]
Variable | Period |
---|---|
1. New buildings completed | 2009–2016 |
2. Number of apartments per 1k residents | 2003–2014 |
3. Registrations from city | 1995–2016 |
4. Balance of internal migration | 1995–2016 |
5. Newly registered business entities | 2009–2016 |
6. Administrative decisions on constructions conditions | 2009–2016 |
7. Coverage of LSDP | 2009–2016 |
Variable | IG | S(n,k) |
---|---|---|
1. New buildings completed | 0.2 | 0.2 |
2. Number of apartments per 1k residents | 0.1 | 0.1 |
3. Registrations from city | 0.2 | 0.2 |
4. Balance of internal migration | 0.3 | 0.3 |
5. Newly registered business entities | 0.1 | 0.1 |
6. Administrative decisions on constructions conditions | 0.05 | 0.05 |
7. Coverage of LSDP | 0.05 | 0.05 |
© 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Lityński, P.; Hołuj, A. Urban Sprawl Risk Delimitation: The Concept for Spatial Planning Policy in Poland. Sustainability 2020, 12, 2637. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12072637
Lityński P, Hołuj A. Urban Sprawl Risk Delimitation: The Concept for Spatial Planning Policy in Poland. Sustainability. 2020; 12(7):2637. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12072637
Chicago/Turabian StyleLityński, Piotr, and Artur Hołuj. 2020. "Urban Sprawl Risk Delimitation: The Concept for Spatial Planning Policy in Poland" Sustainability 12, no. 7: 2637. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12072637
APA StyleLityński, P., & Hołuj, A. (2020). Urban Sprawl Risk Delimitation: The Concept for Spatial Planning Policy in Poland. Sustainability, 12(7), 2637. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12072637