Next Article in Journal
Comparison and Bias-Correction of Satellite-Derived Precipitation Datasets at Local Level in Northern Kenya
Previous Article in Journal
The Contribution of Sustainable Development Goals and Forest-Related Indicators to National Bioeconomy Progress Monitoring
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Removing Sr(II) and Cs(I) from the Aqueous Phase Using Basil Seed and Elucidating the Adsorption Mechanism

1
Faculty of Pharmacy, Kindai University, 3-4-1 Kowakae, Higashi-Osaka, Osaka 577-8502, Japan
2
Faculty of Pharmacy, Chiang Mai University, Suthep Road, Muang District, Chiang Mai 50200, Thailand
3
Cluster of Excellence on Biodiversity-based Economics and Society (B.BES-CMU), Chiang Mai University, Suthep Road, Muang District, Chiang Mai 50200, Thailand
4
Antiaging Center, Kindai University, 3-4-1 Kowakae, Higashi-Osaka, Osaka 577-8502, Japan
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Sustainability 2020, 12(7), 2895; https://doi.org/10.3390/su12072895
Submission received: 13 February 2020 / Revised: 1 April 2020 / Accepted: 2 April 2020 / Published: 5 April 2020
(This article belongs to the Section Sustainable Chemical Engineering and Technology)

Abstract

:
To confirm the capability and mechanisms of Sr(II) and Cs(I) adsorption from the aqueous phase using basil seed (BS), virgin BS, calcined BS (BS500 and BS1000), and enzymatically treated BS, namely Mannanase BGM (M-BS), Pectinase G (P-BS), Hemicellulase (H-BS), and Cellulase A (C-BS) was evaluated. The adsorption capabilities of Sr(II) and Cs(I) of various BS adsorbents were also evaluated. The quantity of Sr(II) and Cs(I) adsorbed onto BS was greater than that of BS500 or BS1000, suggesting that the physicochemical characteristics of the BS surface affected Sr(II) and Cs(I) removal from the aqueous phase. Furthermore, the quantity of Sr(II) and Cs(I) adsorbed onto virgin BS was greater than that of enzymatically treated BS, indicating that glucomannan or (1,4)-xylan in the cellulosic hydrocolloid of the BS strongly affected the adsorption capability of Cs(I) or Sr(II) (except for M-BS in Sr(II) adsorption). Our obtained results indicate that, as an adsorbent, BS was capable of removing Sr(II) and Cs(I) from the aqueous solution.

1. Introduction

The nuclear industry emerged around 1940, and humans have benefited in various ways from nuclear technologies. However, nuclear power plants have received increasing attention owing to their high-risk potential to human health and the ecosystem in recent years [1]. Particularly, the Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Station in Japan (2001) and the Chernobyl Nuclear Power Plant in the Ukrainian SSR (1986) were the sites of well-known disasters [2]. Therefore, the use and subsequent disposal of radioactive waste or the release of these radioactive materials into the water environment is a major concern for the nuclear field [3]. Strontium (Sr(II)) and cesium (Cs(I)) are fission products of nuclear fuels contained in radioactive waste. Because of their long half-life (Sr: 28.74 years, Cs: 30.04 years) and toxicity (such as their carcinogenic properties), technology for removing or separating these materials from water requires special attention [4,5,6,7].
Various studies have reported the production of low-cost adsorbents prepared from waste biomass for Sr(II) and Cs(I) removal from the aqueous phase [3,8,9,10,11]. These reported technologies were based on an adsorption process using biomass adsorbents, indicating that the adsorption process using biomass is an effective and economically promising technique for Sr(II) and Cs(I) removal from water. Additionally, microorganisms including Bacillus spp., Pectinatella magnifica, and Pseudomonas spp. etc. have also proven to be useful in Sr(II) and Cs(I) removal from the aqueous phase. However, in these methods, microorganisms are required to immobilize on a carrier, such as ceramic [12,13]. Our previous studies also reported on the capability of Sr(II) and Cs(I) removal from the aqueous phase using disposed human hair or waste biomass tapioca [14,15].
In this study, basil (Ocimum basilicum) was used for Sr(II) and Cs(I) removal from the water environment. Basil is an herb or spice that is cultivated in regions worldwide, especially in Southeast Asia. In Thailand, the Department of Agriculture, Ministry of Agriculture and Cooperatives reported that the total productivity of basil seed was 280 tons in 2015, while basil straws were produced as byproducts. Additionally, basil seeds are widely consumed as a health dessert [16] and they also have medicinal values such as antispasmodic and stomachic properties [17,18]. However, all basil seeds are not effectively used or recycled in the current situation. Thus, if unused or unrecycled basil seed could be explored, its value and applicability could significantly increase. A previous study reported a cellulosic hydrocolloid system present in the seeds of plants (including basil seed (BS)) [19], and the mucilaginous seed showed that it had the capability to adsorb elements such as Sr, Cs, and Cr [3,20]. The cellulosic hydrocolloid consists of numerous kinds of monosaccharides (namely D-glucose, D-galactose, D-mannose, and L-arabinose) and uronic acid, such as galacturonic acid and mannuronic acid. These saccharides are formed by two main fractions: glucomannan (43%) and (1,4)-xylan (24%) [19]. However, there is a lack of information regarding the relationship between the amount of Sr(II) and Cs(I) adsorbed and the properties of the BS (cellulosic hydrocolloid).
In a recent study, BS was used to adsorb Sr(II) and Cs(I) from an aqueous solution, and the characteristics of calcination or enzymatically treated BS were investigated. In addition, the changes in physicochemical properties (the mucilaginous and swell-upon-wetting nature) of seeds were assessed for calcination at 500 and 1000 °C. Subsequently, the equilibrium adsorption, the effect of contact time and solution pH using BS biomass were demonstrated. The obtained results explained the adsorption mechanism of BS on Sr(II) and Cs(I) which can be used to resolve the water environment and waste biomass material issues.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Materials

Virgin BS was obtained from Thai Cereal World Co., Ltd. (Bangkok, Thailand). Calcined BS was prepared by carbonizing the BS in a muffle furnace at 500 °C or 1000 °C for 2 h which was denoted as BS500 and BS1000, respectively. Mannanase BGM, pectinase G, hemicellulase, and cellulase A were purchased from Amano Enzyme Inc., Nagoya, Japan. The BS was treated with various enzymes by the following procedure. The BS and enzyme were mixed in the ratio of 1:1 in 500 mL Mcilvaine buffer pH 4.0–5.0. The optimum conditions of enzymatic treatment were obtained from Amano Enzyme Inc., Nagoya, Japan and are listed in Table 1. Subsequently, the reaction mixtures were stirred at 100 rpm for at 45–70 °C 24 h and then filtered through a 0.45 µm membrane filter. The obtained BS was freeze-dried at 80 °C. The treated BS samples with Mannanase BGM, pectinase G, hemicellulase, and cellulase A are denoted as Mannanase BGM (M-BS), Pectinase G (P-BS), Hemicellulase (H-BS), and Cellulase A (C-BS), respectively.
Sr standard solution (SrCO3 in 0.1 mol/L nitric acid; 1000 mg/L), Cs standard solution (CsCl in water; 1000 mg/L), sodium hydroxide, and hydrochloric acid were purchased from FUJIFILM Wako Pure Chemical Co. (Osaka, Japan).
The morphologies of the adsorbents were examined by scanning electron microscopy SU1510 (SEM, Hitachi High-Technologies Co., Tokyo, Japan). The specific surface area and pore volume were measured using a specific surface analyzer NOVA4200e (Quantachrome Instruments Japan G.K., Kanagawa, Japan). Elemental analysis was conducted using an electron probe microanalyzer JXA-8530F (EPMA, JEOL Ltd., Tokyo, Japan). The measurement conditions were as follows: accelerating voltage of 15.0 keV, probe current of 20 mA, and a slot beam diameter. The thermogravimetry and differential thermal analysis were measured using a thermal gravimetric differential thermal analyzer TG8120 (TGA-DTA, Rigaku Co., Tokyo, Japan). The pH point of zero charge (pHpzc) and the surface functional groups of the adsorbents were measured by the Faria and Boehm titration methods, respectively [21,22].

2.2. Adsorption Capability of Sr(II) And Cs(I) Using the BS, Calcined BS, And Enzyme-Treated BS

A total of 0.05 g of adsorbents were mixed with 50 mL of Sr (II) or Cs (I) solutions at 1000 µg/L. Then, the reaction mixtures were stirred at 100 rpm at 25 °C for 24 h. After filtration through a 0.45 µm membrane filter, the obtained filtrate was analyzed using inductively coupled plasma optical emission spectrometry iCAP 7600 Duo (ICP-OES, Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc., Kanagawa, Japan) or inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry ICPM-8500 (ICP-MS, Shimadzu Co., Kyoto, Japan) for Sr(II) or Cs(I), respectively. The quantity of Sr(II) and Cs(I) ions adsorbed were calculated using the levels before and after adsorption in Equation (1).
q = ( C 0 C e ) V W
where q is the quantity adsorbed (μg/g), C0 is the initial concentration (µg/L), Ce is the equilibrium concentration (µg/L), V is the solvent volume (L) and W is the weight of the adsorbent (g).

2.3. Adsorption Isotherms of Sr(II) And Cs(I) by the BS and Calcined BS

A total of 0.05 g of adsorbents were mixed with 50 mL of Sr (II) or Cs (I) solution at 1–1000 µg/L, and then, the reaction mixtures were stirred at 100 rpm at 25 °C for 24 h. The quantity adsorbed was calculated using Equation (1).

2.4. Effects of Contact Time And pH on the Adsorption of Sr(II) And Cs(I) by the BS and Calcined BS

To investigate the effects of contact time, 0.05 g of adsorbents were mixed with 50 mL of Sr (II) or Cs (I) solution at 1000 µg/L, and then, the reaction mixtures were stirred at 100 rpm at 25 °C for 0.5, 1, 3, 6, 16, 20, and 24 h. To examine the effects of pH, 0.05 g adsorbents were mixed with 50 mL of Sr (II) or Cs (I) solution at 1000 µg/L, the initial pH in the sample solution was adjusted from 2 to 12 using hydrochloric acid or sodium hydroxide solution. Then, the reaction mixtures were stirred at 100 rpm at 25 °C for 24 h. The quantity of Sr(II) or Cs(I) adsorbed was calculated by Equation (1). The results in this study are expressed as means ± standard errors (n = 2–3 (number of experiments), Section 2.2, Section 2.3 and Section 2.4).

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Effect of Calcination Treatment on Physicochemical Properties

SEM images of virgin and calcined BSs are shown in Figure 1a. A structural collapse was observed, and the pores were increased with increasing calcination temperatures. Table 2 lists the physicochemical properties of BS, BS500, and BS1000. The surface functional groups decreased by the calcination treatment, indicating that the acidic or basic functional groups disappeared via carbonization. Similar changes to the surface functional groups with varying calcination temperatures were reported in a previous study [23]. Conversely, the pHpzc value elevated with increasing calcination temperatures. In addition, the specific surface areas of BS, BS500, and BS1000 were 0.265, 0.937, and 86.902 m2/g, respectively. Therefore, the novel carbonaceous material (BS1000) was produced from the BS using the calcination treatment. Figure 1b shows the TGA-DTA curves of the BS. TGA decreased and DTA increased between 300–600 °C. Yokoyama et. al. reported that the number of phenolic, carboxyl, and other functional groups decreased upon carbonization at approximately 600 °C. Therefore, similar changes (combustion) occurred in our experiment [23]. Additionally, more than 150 species of common basil (Ocimum basilicum L.) genus have been recognized [24]. Therefore, the physicochemical characteristics differ more or less according to the cultivation condition, indicating that the obtained carbonaceous materials from basil seed at different calcination temperatures might affect the adsorption capability of Sr(II) and Cs(I)in the aqueous solution.

3.2. Adsorption Capability of Sr(II) And Cs(I)

The quantities of Sr(II) and Cs(I) adsorbed onto BS, BS500, and BS1000 are shown in Figure 2. The amount of Sr(II) adsorbed was not affected by the calcination treatment. Conversely, the amount of Cs(I) adsorbed decreased with increasing calcination temperatures. These results suggest that the adsorption mechanisms of Sr(II) and Cs(I) were different for the virgin BS and calcined BS.
Moreover, the amount of Sr(II) adsorbed was greater than that of the Cs(I) adsorbed. The crystal radius and ionic radius of Sr (1.32–1.58 Å and 1.18–1.44 Å) were both smaller than those of Cs (1.81–2.02 Å and 1.67–1.88 Å) [25], which suggests that the interaction between Sr(II) and the adsorbent easily occurred compared to Cs(I) in the aqueous solution. In addition, these properties might affect the solvation of hydroxyl ions (solvent effect) under our experimental conditions. A comparison of the Sr(II) and Cs(I) adsorption capability of BS with other adsorbents is listed in Table 3 [10,26,27,28,29,30]. The BS exhibited good potential to be used for Sr(II) and Cs(I) removal from the aqueous solution comparable to other reported adsorbents (except for brewery waste biomass, Rhizopus nigricans, arca shell biomass, and Gracilaria corticata). The obtained results indicated that the initial concentration of Sr(II) or Cs(I) is important for ion removal from the aqueous solution. Therefore, this study evaluated the effect of the initial concentration on the adsorption (adsorption isotherms), as discussed in Section 3.4.
In addition, to find the adsorption mechanism, the relationship between the quantity of Sr(II) or Cs(I) adsorbed and the properties of the adsorbents (Table 2) were evaluated. The correlation coefficients (r2) between the amount of Sr(II) adsorbed and the pHpzc, acidic functional groups, basic functional groups, and specific surface area were 0.527 (positive), 0.312 (negative), 0.211 (negative), and 0.996 (positive), respectively. Moreover, the correlation coefficients (r2) between the amount of Cs(I) adsorbed and the described properties were 0.899 (negative), 0734 (positive), 0.626 (positive), and 0.772 (negative), respectively. The adsorbent surface properties (pHpzc and specific surface area) affected the adsorption capability of Sr(II) and Cs(I) from the aqueous solution. Therefore, the elemental distribution of Sr or Cs onto the BS surface before and after adsorption was investigated (Figure 3), and the involvement of other factors was evaluated, as described in Section 3.5. The results from Figure 3 demonstrated that Sr and Cs were detected after adsorption, indicating that the interaction between Sr(II) or Cs(I) and the BS surface occurred under our experimental conditions.

3.3. Adsorption Kinetics of Sr(II) And Cs(I)

Figure 4 shows the kinetics data of Sr(II) and Cs(I) adsorption. The adsorption equilibrium of Sr(II) and Cs(I) onto the BS was reached at approximately 6 h and 1 h, respectively. Numerous studies reported previously that the adsorption equilibrium of Sr(II) and Cs(I) was 2 h, 3 h, and 24 h using rice straw-based biochar beads, brewer waste biomass, and BTP300 [10,15,26] and 30 min, 8 h, and 1 h using agriculture waste biomass, polyphenols enriched biomass-based adsorbent, and BTP300, respectively [7,15,31]. Therefore, BS could be a potential candidate adsorbent for Sr(II) and Cs(I) removal from an aqueous solution.
The obtained data were fitted to the pseudo-first order model and pseudo-second order model (Table 4). The adsorption kinetics of the metal ions in the liquid phase can be indicated in the pseudo-first order model (Equation (2)) or pseudo-second order model (Equation (3)) [32,33].
d q t d t = k 1 ( q e , e x p q t ) ,
d q t d t = k 2 ( q e , e x p q t ) 2 ,
where qe,exp and qt are the quantities of Sr(II) and Cs(I) adsorbed at equilibrium and at time t (µg/g), respectively; k1 (1/h) and k2 (g/μg/h) are rate constants of the pseudo-first order and pseudo-second order models, respectively. To confirm conformance, the experimental data should be applied to the linear formula of each model (Equations (4) and (5)) [32,33].
ln(qe,expqt) = lnqe,calk1t,
t q t = t q e , c a l + 1 k 2 × q e , c a l 2 ,
where qe,cal is the amount of Sr(II) and Cs(I) adsorbed in the calculation (µg/g). From Table 4, the correlation coefficients of the pseudo-second order model (Sr(II): 0.986−0.998, Cs(I): 0.970−1.000) were higher than those of the pseudo-first order model (Sr(II): 0.917−0.961, Cs(I): 0.050−0.459). Moreover, qe,exp was closer to qe,cal of the pseudo-second order model than that of the pseudo-first order model. Thus, the overall rate of the Sr(II) or Cs(I) adsorption is acceptably controlled by the chemisorption process, and the rate determining mechanism depends on the diffusion process [34,35].

3.4. Adsorption Isotherms of Sr(II) And Cs(I)

Figure 5 shows the adsorption isotherms data of Sr(II) and Cs(I) with BS, BS500, and BS1000. The amount adsorbed was in the order BS500 < BS1000 < BS for Sr(II) and BS1000 < BS500 < BS for Cs(I). To evaluate the adsorption mechanism, adsorption isotherms data were fitted to the Langmuir and Freundlich isotherm models (Table 5).
The Langmuir isotherm formula can be represented by Equations (6) and (7) [34,35]:
q = K L q max C 1 + K L C
1 q = 1 q max + 1 K L q max C
where q is the quantity of Sr(II) or Cs(I) adsorbed, (µg/g), qmax is the maximum amount of Sr(II) or Cs(I) adsorbed (µg/g), KL is the Langmuir isotherm constant (L/µg), and C is the equilibrium concentration (µg/L). The Langmuir isotherm model is the theoretical model and can explain the monolayer adsorption onto homogenous surfaces. In addition, this model is considered based on the adsorption sites.
The Freundlich isotherm formula can be represented by Equations (8) and (9) [36,37]:
q = KFC1/n,
log q = 1 n log C + log K F
where KF and 1/n are the Freundlich isotherm constants. The Freundlich isotherm model is an empirical model and can explain the monolayer adsorption onto heterogeneous surfaces. In general, the adsorption reaction in the aqueous phase fits this model. In the Freundlich isotherm model, the form of the isotherm curve depends on the value of n. Particularly, when the value of 1/n is 0.1–0.5, adsorption occurs easily, and when the value of 1/n is over two, it is hard to adsorb [38].
The fitting results of the isotherms data using the Langmuir model and Freundlich model area are illustrated in Table 5. The correlation coefficients of the Langmuir model (Sr(II): 0.962−1.000, Cs(I): 0.964−0.996) and Freundlich model (Sr(II): 0.966−0998, Cs(I): 0.957−0.997) were high. Thus, the Sr(II) or Cs(I) adsorption using BS is attributed to monolayer adsorption. In addition, the value of 1/n (Sr(II): 0.8–1.3, Cs(I): 1.1–2.6) indicated that Sr(II) and Cs(I) were efficiently adsorbed onto the BS under our experimental conditions, and showed exceptional adsorption of Cs(I) using BS1000.

3.5. Effect of pH on the Adsorption of Sr(II) And Cs(I)

The amount of Sr(II) and Cs(I) adsorbed in various pH conditions is shown in Figure 6. The solution pH affected the capability of Sr(II) and Cs(I) adsorption from the aqueous solution using the BS. Numerous studies previously reported the adsorption mechanisms of Sr(II) and Cs(I) using agricultural waste biomass or banana fiber adsorbent [3,11,31], and explained that cationic ions were adsorbed according to the cation exchanges with the functional groups onto the biomass surface. Therefore, competition between Sr(II) or Cs(I) and H+ (proton) occurred, and the adsorption capability decreased in acidic conditions (pH: 2–3). Conversely, the level of Sr(II) and Cs(I) adsorbed increased in weakly acidic conditions (pH > 4.0); because the concentration of hydroxyl groups in the solution increased, the consumption of protons by competition adsorption onto the active site of the adsorbent also decreased. Similar trends occurred in this study (Figure 7).
Moreover, lignins, or surface functional groups which contained a lone pair of electrons, present in oxygen affected the adsorption site of Sr(II) and Cs(I). Various studies reported previously that the adsorption site of Sr(II) could be considered a low acidity ion exchange reaction site, additional adsorption site, or mucilage polysaccharide (carboxyl groups, hydroxyl groups, etc.) in waste biomass [3,7,11,31]. There is a lack of information regarding the adsorption mechanism of Sr(II) and Cs(II) using BS. Therefore, to elucidate the adsorption mechanism of these cations, this study focused on the cellulosic hydrocolloid in BS.
Cellulosic hydrocolloid was produced from the BS in the aqueous phase, indicating that the BS adsorbs water. The hydrocolloids were present as a type of cellulose–hemicellulosic polysaccharide composite [19]. The cellulosic hydrocolloid of the BS contained approximately 43% glucomannan and approximately 24% (1,4)-xylan. Therefore, to determine the relationship between cellulosic hydrocolloid and the adsorption capability, glucomannan and (1,4)-xylan were decomposed (hydrolyzed) by Mannanase BGM, pectinase G, hemicellulase, and cellulase A, respectively (denoted as M-BS, P-BS, H-BS, and C-BS). Figure 8 shows the SEM images of M-BS, P-BS, H-BS, and C-BS and the quantity of Sr(II) and Cs(I) adsorbed. The quantity of Sr(II) or Cs(I) adsorbed onto the BS was greater than that onto the BS treated with each enzyme, indicating that the cellulosic hydrocolloid containing glucomannan or (1,4)-xylan was related to the adsorption capability of Sr(II) and Cs(I) using BS (except for M-BS in Sr(II) adsorption). Moreover, glucomannan and (1,4)-xylan affected the adsorption capability of Cs(I) or Sr(II). Therefore, the obtained results are useful, demonstrating the removal of Sr(II) and Cs(I) using BS. However, the contribution of each factor (cellulosic hydrocolloid) was not elucidated for the removal of Sr(II) and Cs(I) from the aqueous phase in this study. Further studies are required to determine the adsorption mechanisms of Sr(II) and Cs(I) using BS or to improve their adsorption capability.

4. Conclusions

We prepared novel carbonaceous materials (BS500 and BS1000) produced from basil seed for the removal of Sr(II) and Cs(I) in the aqueous phase. The physicochemical characteristics of BS500 and BS1000 were drastically changed after calcination. The quantity of Sr(II) and Cs(I) adsorbed onto BS was greater than that of BS500 and BS1000, indicating that calcination of the BS did not improve the adsorption capability of these ions from the aqueous phase. The adsorbent surface properties (pHpzc and specific surface area) were involved in the adsorption of Sr(II) and Cs(I) under our experimental condition. The adsorption kinetics followed the pseudo-second order model (the correlation coefficients of Sr(II) and Cs(I) were 0.986–0.998 and 0.970–1.000, respectively). The adsorption isotherm data fitted to the Langmuir and Freundlich models. The optimal pH condition for Sr(II) and Cs(I) removal was approximately over 4.0. Moreover, the quantity of Sr(II) and Cs(I) adsorbed onto M-BS, P-BS, H-BS, and C-BS was lower than that of BS. These results indicate that glucomannan and (1,4)-xylan in cellulosic hydrocolloid were related to the adsorption capability of the BS on Cs(I) or Sr(II) (except for M-BS in Sr(II) adsorption). Our study demonstrated that BS is useful and is a potential candidate for Sr(II) and Cs(I) removal from the aqueous phase, and elucidated some of the adsorption mechanisms of Sr(II) and Cs(II) from the aqueous phase.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, N.K. and F.O.; investigation, Y.U., C.S., and T.N.; resources, C.S.; writing—original draft preparation, Y.U. and F.O.; writing—review and editing, F.O. and C.S.; project administration, N.K. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Wang, J.L.; Zhuang, S.T.; Liu, Y. Metal hexacyanoferrates-based adsorbents for cesium removal. Coord. Chem. Rev. 2018, 374, 430–438. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Manolopoulou, M.; Vagena, E.; Stoulos, S.; Ioannodou, A.; Papastefanou, C. Radioiodine and radiocesium in Thessaloniki, North Greece due to the Fukushima nuclear accident. J. Environ. Radioact. 2011, 102, 796–797. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Chakraborty, D.; Maji, S.; Bandyopadhyay, A.; Basu, S. Biosorption of cesium-137 and strontium-90 by mucilaginous seeds of Ocimum basilicum. Bioresour. Technol. 2007, 98, 2949–2952. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Ahmadpour, A.; Zabihi, M.; Tahmasbi, M.; Bastami, T.R. Effect of adsorbents and chemical treatments on the removal of strontium from aqueous solution. J. Hazard. Mater. 2010, 182, 551–556. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Martell, E.A. Atmospheric aspects of 90Sr2+ fallout. Science 1959, 129, 1197–1206. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Merceille, A.; Weinzaepfel, E.; Barre, Y.; Grandjean, A. The sorption behavior of synthetic sodium nonatitanate and Zeolite A for removing radioactive strontium from aqueous waste. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2012, 96, 81–88. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Gurung, M.; Adhikari, B.B.; Alam, S.; Kawakita, H.; Ohto, K.; Inoue, K.; Harata, H. Adsorptive removal of Cs(I) from aqueous solution using polyphenols enriched biomass-based adsorbents. Chem. Eng. J. 2013, 231, 113–120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Yoo, J.I.; Shinagawa, T.; Wood, J.P.; Linak, W.P.; Santoianni, D.A.; King, C.J.; Seo, Y.C.; Wendt, J.O.L. High-temperature sorption of cesium and strontium on dispersed kaolinite powders. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2005, 39, 5087–5094. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Liu, X.; Chen, G.R.; Lee, D.J.; Kawamoto, T.; Tanaka, H.; Chen, M.L.; Luo, Y.K. Adsorption removal of cesium from drinking waters: A mini review on use of biosorbents and other adsorbents. Bioresour. Technol. 2014, 160, 142–149. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Chen, C.; Wang, J. Removal of Pb2+, As+, Cs+ and Sr2+ from aqueous solution by brewery’s waste biomass. J. Hazard. Mater. 2008, 151, 65–70. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Kajiyama, T.; Kokusen, H. Study of adsorption behavior of cesium and strontium ions with banana fiber adsorbent. J. Ion Exchange 2016, 27, 8–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  12. He, Y.; Wang, J.; Shi, J. Sr(II) removal from aqueous solution by Bacillus cereus biomass, equilibrium and kinetic studies. Adv. Mater. Res. 2011, 230–232, 1129–1132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Zhu, T.; Wang, L.; Ge, F. Equilibrium and kinetic studies of aqueous cesium(I) ions biosorption by Pseudomonas alcaligenes biomass as a low-cost natural biosorbent. Adv. Mater. Res. 2011, 171, 53–56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Ogata, F.; Nagai, N.; Soeda, A.; Yamashiro, K.; Nakamura, T.; Saenjum, C.; Kawasaki, N. Removal of Sr(II) ions from aqueous solution by human hair treated with EDTA. Bioresour. Technol. Rep. 2020, 9, 100393. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Ogata, F.; Nagai, N.; Ueta, E.; Nakamura, T.; Kawasaki, N. Biomass potential of virgin and calcined tapioca (cassava starch) for the removal of Sr(II) and Cs(I) from aqueous solutions. Chem. Pharm. Bull. 2018, 66, 295–302. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  16. Sakdasri, W.; Ngamprasertsith, S.; Sooksai, S.; Noitang, S.; Sukaead, W.; Sawangkeaw, R. Defatted fiber produced from lemon Basil (Ocimum citriodorum Vis.) seed with supercritical CO2: Economic analysis. Ind. Crops Pro. 2019, 135, 188–195. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Naji-Tabasi, S.; Ali Razavi, S.M. Functional properties and applications of basil seed gum: An overview. Food Hydro. 2017, 73, 313–325. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Choi, J.Y.; Heo, S.; Bae, S.; Kim, J.; Moon, K.D. Discriminating the origin of basil seeds (Ocimum basilicum L.) using hyperspectral imaging analysis. LWT 2020, 118, 108715. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Azuma, J.; Sakamoto, M. Cellulosic hydrocolloid system present in seed of plants. Trends Glycosci. Glycotechnol. 2003, 15, 1–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  20. Melo, J.S.; D’Souza, S.F. Removal of chromium by mucilaginous seeds of Ocimum basilicum. Biorecour. Technol. 2004, 92, 151–155. [Google Scholar]
  21. Faria, P.C.C.; Orfao, J.J.M.; Pereira, M.F.R. Adsorption of anionic and cationic dyes on activated carbons with different surface chemistries. Water Res. 2004, 38, 2043–2052. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Boehm, H.P. Chemical identification of surface groups. J. Adv. Catal. Sci. Technol. 1966, 16, 179–274. [Google Scholar]
  23. Yokoyama, R.; Hayashi, S.; Nakanishi, M.; Takada, J. NO3-N adsorption property of Ca-containing charcoal. J. Jpn. Soc. Water Environ. 2008, 31, 47–52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. DzoyemL, J.P.; McGaw, J.; Kuete, V.; Bakowsky, U. Anti-inflammatory and Anti-nociceptive Activities of African Medicinal Spices and Vegetables. In Medicinal spices and vegetables from Africa: therapeutic potential against metabolic, inflammatory, infectious and systemic diseases; Academic Press: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2017; pp. 239–270. [Google Scholar]
  25. Shannon, R.D. Revised effective ionic radii and systematic studies of interatomic distances in halides and chalcogenides. Acta Cryst. 1976, A32, 751–767. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Jang, J.; Mirana, W.; Divine, S.D.; Nawaz, M.; Shahzad, A.; Woo, S.H.; Lee, D.S. Rice straw-based biochar beads for the removal of radioactive strontium from aqueous solution. Sci. Total Environ. 2018, 615, 698–707. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Kogej, A.; Pavko, A. Comparison of Rhizopus nigricans in a pelleted growth from with some other types of waste microbial biomass as biosorbents for metal ions. World J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2001, 17, 677–685. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Khandaker, S.; Kuba, T.; Kamida, S.; Uchikawa, Y. Adsorption of cesium from aqueous solution by raw and concentrated nitric acid-modified bamboo charcoal. J. Environ. Chem. Eng. 2017, 5, 1456–1464. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Dahiya, S.; Tripathi, R.M.; Hedge, A.G. Biosorption of heavy metals and radionuclide from aqueous solutions by pre-treated arca shell biomass. J. Hazard. Mater. 2008, 150, 376–386. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Jalali-Rad, R.; Ghafourian, H.; Asef, Y.; Dalir, S.T.; Sahafipour, M.H.; Gharanjik, B.M. Biosorption of cesium by native and chemically modified biomass of marine algal: introduce the new biosorbents for biotechnology applications. J. Hazard. Mater. 2004, B116, 125–134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Pangeni, B.; Paudyal, H.; Inoue, K.; Kawakita, H.; Ohto, K.; Gurung, M.; Alam, S. Development of low cost adsorbents from agricultural waste biomass for the removal of Sr(II) and Cs(I) from water. Waste Biomass Valor. 2014, 5, 1019–1028. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Lagergren, S. Zur theorie der sogenannten adsorption geloster stoffie, Kunglia Svenska Vetenskapsakademiens. Handlingar 1898, 24, 1–39. [Google Scholar]
  33. Ho, Y.S.; McKay, G. Pseudo-second order model for sorption process. Pro. Biochem. 1999, 34, 451–465. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Chairat, M.; Rattanaphani, S.; Bremner, J.B.; Rattanaphani, V. An adsorption and kinetic study of lac dyeing on silk. Dyes Pigments 2005, 64, 231–241. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Fang, Y.; Zhang, T.; Li, P.; Jiang, R.; Wu, S.; Nie, H.; Wang, Y. Phosphorus recovery from biogas fermentation liquid by Ca-Mg loaded biochar. J. Environ. Sci. 2015, 29, 106–114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Langmuir, I. The constitution and fundamental properties of solids and liquids. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1916, 38, 2221–2295. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  37. Freundlich, H.M.T. Over the adsorption in solution. J. Phy. Chem. 1906, 57, 385–471. [Google Scholar]
  38. Abe, I.; Hayashi, K.; Kitagawa, M. Studies on the adsorption of surfactants on activated carbons. I. Adsorption of nonionic surfactants. Yukagaku 1976, 25, 145–150. [Google Scholar]
Figure 1. SEM images of adsorbents (a) and thermal gravimetric differential thermal analyzer (TGA-DTA) curves of BS (b).
Figure 1. SEM images of adsorbents (a) and thermal gravimetric differential thermal analyzer (TGA-DTA) curves of BS (b).
Sustainability 12 02895 g001
Figure 2. Amounts adsorbed of Sr(II) and Cs(I) onto adsorbents. Initial concentration: 1000 μg/L, sample volume: 50 mL, adsorbent: 0.05 g, temperature: 25 °C, contact time: 24 h, 100 rpm, □: Sr(II), ■: Cs(I).
Figure 2. Amounts adsorbed of Sr(II) and Cs(I) onto adsorbents. Initial concentration: 1000 μg/L, sample volume: 50 mL, adsorbent: 0.05 g, temperature: 25 °C, contact time: 24 h, 100 rpm, □: Sr(II), ■: Cs(I).
Sustainability 12 02895 g002
Figure 3. Qualitative analysis of BS surface before and after adsorption of Sr(II) and Cs(I).
Figure 3. Qualitative analysis of BS surface before and after adsorption of Sr(II) and Cs(I).
Sustainability 12 02895 g003
Figure 4. Adsorption kinetics of Sr(II) and Cs(I) onto adsorbents. Initial concentration: 1000 μg/L, sample volume: 50 mL, adsorbent: 0.05 g, temperature: 25 °C, contact time: 10 min–24 h, 100 rpm, ○: BS, ●: BS500, ▲: BS1000.
Figure 4. Adsorption kinetics of Sr(II) and Cs(I) onto adsorbents. Initial concentration: 1000 μg/L, sample volume: 50 mL, adsorbent: 0.05 g, temperature: 25 °C, contact time: 10 min–24 h, 100 rpm, ○: BS, ●: BS500, ▲: BS1000.
Sustainability 12 02895 g004
Figure 5. Adsorption isotherms of Sr(II) and Cs(I) onto adsorbents. Initial concentration: 1–1000 μg/L, sample volume: 50 mL, adsorbent: 0.05 g, temperature: 25 °C, contact time: 24 h, 100 rpm, ○: BS, ●: BS500, ▲: BS1000.
Figure 5. Adsorption isotherms of Sr(II) and Cs(I) onto adsorbents. Initial concentration: 1–1000 μg/L, sample volume: 50 mL, adsorbent: 0.05 g, temperature: 25 °C, contact time: 24 h, 100 rpm, ○: BS, ●: BS500, ▲: BS1000.
Sustainability 12 02895 g005
Figure 6. Amount of Sr(II) or Cs(I) adsorbed at different pH conditions. Initial concentration: 1000 μg/L, sample volume: 50 mL, adsorbent: 0.05 g, temperature: 25 °C, contact time: 24 h, pH in solution: 2–10, 100 rpm, □: BS, ■: BS500, : BS1000.
Figure 6. Amount of Sr(II) or Cs(I) adsorbed at different pH conditions. Initial concentration: 1000 μg/L, sample volume: 50 mL, adsorbent: 0.05 g, temperature: 25 °C, contact time: 24 h, pH in solution: 2–10, 100 rpm, □: BS, ■: BS500, : BS1000.
Sustainability 12 02895 g006
Figure 7. Adsorption mechanism of Sr(II) or Cs(I) by cellulose–hemicellulosic polysaccharide composite.
Figure 7. Adsorption mechanism of Sr(II) or Cs(I) by cellulose–hemicellulosic polysaccharide composite.
Sustainability 12 02895 g007
Figure 8. SEM images of adsorbents (a) and amount of Sr(II) and Cs(I) adsorbed onto enzyme-treated BSs (b). Initial concentration: 1000 μg/L, sample volume: 50 mL, adsorbent: 0.05 g, temperature: 25 °C, contact time: 24 h, 100 rpm.
Figure 8. SEM images of adsorbents (a) and amount of Sr(II) and Cs(I) adsorbed onto enzyme-treated BSs (b). Initial concentration: 1000 μg/L, sample volume: 50 mL, adsorbent: 0.05 g, temperature: 25 °C, contact time: 24 h, 100 rpm.
Sustainability 12 02895 g008
Table 1. The conditions of enzyme treatment with basil seed (BS).
Table 1. The conditions of enzyme treatment with basil seed (BS).
AdsorbentsEnzymepHTemperature (°C)
M-BSMannanase BGM5.050–70
P-BSPectinase G4.050
H-BSHemicellulase4.545
C-BSCellulase A4.550–60
Table 2. Physicochemical properties of adsorbents.
Table 2. Physicochemical properties of adsorbents.
AdsorbentspHpzcSurface Functional Groups (mmol/g)Specific Surface Area
(m2/g)
Pore Volume
(cc/g)
AcidicBasicMicroMesoMacro
BS5.590.0500.6050.265N/A*N/A*N/A*
BS5009.850.0060.1270.937N/A*0.0040.006
BS10000.0060.0060.1870.187N/A*0.0190.005
* Not applicable.
Table 3. Comparison of Sr(II) or Cs(I) adsorption capacity of BS with other reported adsorbents.
Table 3. Comparison of Sr(II) or Cs(I) adsorption capacity of BS with other reported adsorbents.
SamplesAdsorbentsAdsorption Capability (mg/g)pHTemp.(°C)Initial Concentration (mg/L)Contact Time (h)Adsorbent (g/L)Ref.
Sr(II)Paprika biochar0.02-251241[26]
Spent mushroom biochar0.04-251241[26]
Rice straw biochar0.05-251241[26]
Brewery’s waste biomass7.91430Approximately
700
32[10]
Rhizopus nigricans24.5522 ± 110002-[27]
BS0.63-251241This study
Cs(I)Brewery’s waste biomass10.1430Approximately
700
32[10]
Arca shell biomass4.005.525 ± 210–50035[29]
Bamboo charcoal0.17-2080061[28]
Gracilaria corticata14.65.53020–50032[30]
BS0.52-251241This study
Table 4. Fitting results of kinetic data using pseudo-first order model and pseudo-second order model.
Table 4. Fitting results of kinetic data using pseudo-first order model and pseudo-second order model.
SamplesAdsorbentsqe,expPseudo-First Order ModelPseudo-Second Order Model
k1
(1/h)
qe,cal
(mg/g)
rk2
(g/mg/h)
qe,cal
(mg/g)
r
Sr(II)BS632.52.4 × 10−1293.00.9611.2 × 10−3674.90.986
BS500287.61.9 × 10−1114.80.9174.1 × 10−3305.10.998
BS1000587.36.4 × 10−1547.10.9561.8 × 10−3621.90.998
Cs(I)BS519.44.8 × 10−388.00.050−2.4 × 10−2519.61.000
BS500191.75.4 × 10−210.90.459−1.5 × 10−2151.80.972
BS100049.23.6 × 10−347.00.090−7.8 × 10−258.30.970
Table 5. Fitting results of isotherms data using Langmuir model and Freundlich model.
Table 5. Fitting results of isotherms data using Langmuir model and Freundlich model.
SamplesAdsorbentsLangmuir ConstantsFreundlich Constants
qmax
(mg/g)
KL
(L/mg)
rlogKF1/nr
Sr(II)BS441.65.6 × 10−30.9621.31.50.966
BS500838.48.0 × 10−41.0000.81.30.998
BS1000825.01.1 × 10−30.9891.10.90.990
Cs(I)BS948.01.6 × 10−30.9961.11.10.997
BS500421.01.0 × 10−30.9861.10.30.981
BS100012.11.4 × 10−30.9642.63.7 × 10−60.957

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Uematsu, Y.; Ogata, F.; Saenjum, C.; Nakamura, T.; Kawasaki, N. Removing Sr(II) and Cs(I) from the Aqueous Phase Using Basil Seed and Elucidating the Adsorption Mechanism. Sustainability 2020, 12, 2895. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12072895

AMA Style

Uematsu Y, Ogata F, Saenjum C, Nakamura T, Kawasaki N. Removing Sr(II) and Cs(I) from the Aqueous Phase Using Basil Seed and Elucidating the Adsorption Mechanism. Sustainability. 2020; 12(7):2895. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12072895

Chicago/Turabian Style

Uematsu, Yugo, Fumihiko Ogata, Chalermpong Saenjum, Takehiro Nakamura, and Naohito Kawasaki. 2020. "Removing Sr(II) and Cs(I) from the Aqueous Phase Using Basil Seed and Elucidating the Adsorption Mechanism" Sustainability 12, no. 7: 2895. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12072895

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop