Manager’s Age, Sustainable Entrepreneurial Orientation and Sustainable Performance: A Conceptual Outlook
Abstract
:1. Introduction
2. Method
3. Theoretical Background
3.1. Manager’s Age and Sustainable Corporate Performance
3.2. Sustainable Entrepreneurial Orientation (SEO) and Sustainable Corporate Performance
3.3. Theories
3.4. Proposition Development: Linking Manager’s Age to Sustainable Corporate Performance via SEO
3.4.1. Manager’s Age and SEO
3.4.2. SEO and Economic Performance
3.4.3. SEO and Social Performance
3.4.4. SEO and Environmental Performance
3.4.5. Manager’s Age Diversity, SEO and Sustainable Corporate Performance
4. Findings
5. Discussion and Conclusions
6. Research Implications
Author Contributions
Funding
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Ong, T.S.; Magsi, H.B.; Burgess, T.F. Organisational culture, environmental management control systems, environmental performance of Pakistani manufacturing industry. Int. J. Product. Perform. Manag. 2019. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ikram, M.; Zhou, P.; Shah, S.A.A.; Liu, G.Q. Do environmental management systems help improve corporate sustainable development? Evidence from manufacturing companies in Pakistan. J. Clean. Prod. 2019, 226, 628–641. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Caldera, H.T.S.; Desha, C.; Dawes, L. Evaluating the enablers and barriers for successful implementation of sustainable business practice in ‘lean’ SMEs. J. Clean. Prod. 2019, 218, 575–590. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Saleh, T.A.; Danmaliki, G.I. Polymer Consumption, Environmental Concerns, Possible Disposal Options, and Recycling for Water Treatment. In Sustainable Infrastructure: Breakthroughs in Research and Practice; IGI Global: Pennsylvania, PA, USA, 2020; pp. 691–708. [Google Scholar]
- Aboughaly, M.; Gabbar, H.A. Recent Technologies in Electronic-Waste Management. In E-waste Recycling and Management; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2020; pp. 63–80. [Google Scholar]
- Pavithra, K.G.; Rajan, P.S.S.; Balaji, D.; Gopinath, K.P. Sustainable Electronic-Waste Management: Implications on Environmental and Human Health. In E-waste Recycling and Management; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2020; pp. 201–218. [Google Scholar]
- Khan, D.; Ullah, A. Testing the relationship between globalization and carbon dioxide emissions in Pakistan: Does environmental Kuznets curve exist? Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2019, 26, 15194–15208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Orji, I.J. Examining barriers to organizational change for sustainability and drivers of sustainable performance in the metal manufacturing industry. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 2019, 140, 102–114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ghadimi, P.; Wang, C.; Lim, M.K. Sustainable supply chain modeling and analysis: Past debate, present problems and future challenges. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 2019, 140, 72–84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Henao, R.; Sarache, W.; Gómez, I. Lean manufacturing and sustainable performance: Trends and future challenges. J. Clean. Prod. 2019, 208, 99–116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jawaad, M.; Zafar, S. Improving sustainable development and firm performance in emerging economies by implementing green supply chain activities. Sustain. Dev. 1962, sd.1962. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kang, J. Unobservable CEO Characteristics and CEO Compensation as Correlated Determinants of CSP. Bus. Soc. 2017, 56, 419–453. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cho, C.K.; Cho, T.S.; Lee, J. Managerial attributes, consumer proximity, and corporate environmental performance. Corp. Soc. Responsib. Environ. Manag. 2019, 26, 159–169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Liu, L. Top Management Characteristics, Green Supply Chain Management and Corporate Performance—Moderating Effects of Competition Intensity. J. Hum. Resour. Sustain. Stud. 2019, 7, 55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Lee, W.S.; Sun, K.-A.; Moon, J. Application of upper echelon theory for corporate social responsibility dimensions: Evidence from the restaurant industry. J. Qual. Assur. Hosp. Tour. 2018, 19, 387–414. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Huang, S.K. The Impact of CEO Characteristics on Corporate Sustainable Development: CSR Drivers, CSR CEO Characteristics, Hypotheses, Method, Discusssion. Corp. Soc. Responsib. Environ. Manag. 2013, 20, 234–244. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Oh, W.-Y.; Chang, Y.K.; Cheng, Z. When CEO career horizon problems matter for corporate social responsibility: The moderating roles of industry-level discretion and blockholder ownership. J. Bus. Ethics 2016, 133, 279–291. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Trana, N.M.; Phama, B.-N.T. The influence of CEO characteristics on corporate environmental performance of SMEs: Evi-dence from Vietnamese SMEs. Manag. Sci. Lett. 2020, 10, 1671–1682. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shahab, Y.; Ntim, C.G.; Chen, Y.; Ullah, F.; Li, H.; Ye, Z. Chief executive officer attributes, sustainable performance, environmental performance, and environmental reporting: New insights from upper echelons perspective. Bus. Strategy Environ. 2020, 29, 1–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kraus, S.; Burtscher, J.; Vallaster, C.; Angerer, M. Sustainable Entrepreneurship Orientation: A Reflection on Status-Quo Research on Factors Facilitating Responsible Managerial Practices. Sustainability 2018, 10, 444. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Ladik, D.M.; Stewart, D.W. The contribution continuum. J. Acad. Mark. Sci. 2008, 36, 157–165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Summers, J.O. Guidelines for conducting research and publishing in marketing: From conceptualization through the review process. In How to Get Published in the Best Marketing Journals; Edward Elgar Publishing: Cheltenham, UK, 2019. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fatoki, O. Green entrepreneurial orientation and firm performance in South Africa. Entrep. Sustain. Issues 2019, 7, 247–262. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sarango-Lalangui, P.; Santos, J.; Hormiga, E. The Development of Sustainable Entrepreneurship Research Field. Sustainability 2018, 10, 2005. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Criado-Gomis, A.; Cervera-Taulet, A.; Iniesta-Bonillo, M.-A. Sustainable Entrepreneurial Orientation: A Business Strategic Approach for Sustainable Development. Sustainability 2017, 9, 1667. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Terán-Yépez, E.; Marín-Carrillo, G.M.; Casado-Belmonte, M. del P.; Capobianco-Uriarte, M. de las M. Sustainable entrepreneurship: Review of its evolution and new trends. J. Clean. Prod. 2020, 252, 119742. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- De Guimarães, J.C.F.; Dorion, E.C.H.; Severo, E.A. Antecedents, mediators and consequences of sustainable operations: A framework for analysis of the manufacturing industry. Benchmarking Int. J. 2019. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Torraco, R.J. Writing Integrative Literature Reviews: Guidelines and Examples. Hum. Resour. Dev. Rev. 2005, 4, 356–367. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Seuring, S.; Gold, S. Conducting content-analysis based literature reviews in supply chain management. Supply Chain Manag. Int. J. 2012, 17, 544–555. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Duriau, V.J.; Reger, R.K.; Pfarrer, M.D. A Content Analysis of the Content Analysis Literature in Organization Studies: Research Themes, Data Sources, and Methodological Refinements. Organ. Res. Methods 2007, 10, 5–34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Mayring, P. Qualitative content analysis: Theoretical background and procedures. In Approaches to qualitative research in mathematics education; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2015; pp. 365–380. [Google Scholar]
- Tranfield, D.; Denyer, D.; Smart, P. Towards a Methodology for Developing Evidence-Informed Management Knowledge by Means of Systematic Review. Br. J. Manag. 2003, 14, 207–222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tanikawa, T.; Kim, S.; Jung, Y. Top management team diversity and firm performance: Exploring a function of age. Team Perform. Manag. Int. J. 2017, 23, 156–170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ma, Y.; Zhang, Q.; Yin, Q.; Wang, B. The Influence of Top Managers on Environmental Information Disclosure: The Moderating Effect of Company’s Environmental Performance. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public. Health 2019, 16, 1167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Huo, B.; Gu, M.; Wang, Z. Green or lean? A supply chain approach to sustainable performance. J. Clean. Prod. 2019, 216, 152–166. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Svensson, G.; Padin, C. Industry note: Sustainable development requires economic, social and environmental sustainability: A business perspective. Int. J. Agric. Innov. Technol. Glob. 2019. [Google Scholar]
- Khurana, S.; Haleem, A.; Mannan, B. Determinants for integration of sustainability with innovation for Indian manufacturing enterprises: Empirical evidence in MSMEs. J. Clean. Prod. 2019, 229, 374–386. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, F.; Cheng, Z.; Keung, C.; Reisner, A. Impact of manager characteristics on corporate environmental behavior at heavy-polluting firms in Shaanxi, China. J. Clean. Prod. 2015, 108, 707–715. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Xu, J.; Yun, K.; Yan, F.; Jang, P.; Kim, J.; Pang, C. A Study on the Effect of TMT Characteristics and Vertical Dyad Similarity on Enterprise Achievements. Sustainability 2019, 11, 2913. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Elmagrhi, M.H.; Ntim, C.G.; Elamer, A.A.; Zhang, Q. A study of environmental policies and regulations, governance structures, and environmental performance: The role of female directors. Bus. Strategy Environ. 2019, 28, 206–220. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cohen, B.; Winn, M.I. Market imperfections, opportunity and sustainable entrepreneurship. J. Bus. Ventur. 2007, 22, 29–49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gast, J.; Gundolf, K.; Cesinger, B. Doing business in a green way: A systematic review of the ecological sustainability entrepreneurship literature and future research directions. J. Clean. Prod. 2017, 147, 44–56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shepherd, D.A.; Patzelt, H. The New Field of Sustainable Entrepreneurship: Studying Entrepreneurial Action Linking “What Is to Be Sustained” With “What Is to Be Developed”. Entrep. Theory Pract. 2011, 35, 137–163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Syrjä, P.; Puumalainen, K.; Sjögrén, H.; Soininen, J.; Durst, S. Entrepreneurial orientation in firms with a social mission—A mixed-methods approach. Cogent Bus. Manag. 2019, 6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Alvarez, S.A.; Busenitz, L.W. The entrepreneurship of resource-based theory. J. Manag. 2001, 27, 755–775. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Crittenden, V.L.; Crittenden, W.F.; Ferrell, L.K.; Ferrell, O.C.; Pinney, C.C. Market-oriented sustainability: A conceptual framework and propositions. J. Acad. Mark. Sci. 2011, 39, 71–85. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hernández-Perlines, F.; Ibarra Cisneros, M. The Role of Environment in Sustainable Entrepreneurial Orientation. The Case of Family Firms. Sustainability 2018, 10, 2037. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Thananusak, T. Science Mapping of the Knowledge Base on Sustainable Entrepreneurship, 1996–2019. Sustainability 2019, 11, 3565. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Konys, A. Towards Sustainable Entrepreneurship Holistic Construct. Sustainability 2019, 11, 6749. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Hambrick, D.C. Upper Echelons Theory: An update; Academy of Management Briarcliff Manor: New York, NY, USA, 2007; p. 10510. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Teece, D.; Pisano, G. The Dynamic Capabilities of Firms: An Introduction. Ind. Corp. Change 1994, 3, 537–556. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Yu, W.; Jacobs, M.A.; Chavez, R.; Yang, J. Dynamism, disruption orientation, and resilience in the supply chain and the impacts on financial performance: A dynamic capabilities perspective. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 2019, 218, 352–362. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jiang, W.; Chai, H.; Shao, J.; Feng, T. Green entrepreneurial orientation for enhancing firm performance: A dynamic capability perspective. J. Clean. Prod. 2018, 198, 1311–1323. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Criado-Gomis, A.; Iniesta-Bonillo, M.Á.; Cervera-Taulet, A.; Ribeiro-Soriano, D. Customer functional value creation through a sustainable entrepreneurial orientation approach. Econ. Res.-Ekon. Istraživanja 2019, 1–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Chan, D.; Berger, R.; Man, T.W.Y. The impact of managerial characteristics on business strategies under the environmental change: An investigation of the Israeli diamond industry. J. Small Bus. Entrep. 2019, 1–26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gryshova, I.; Petrova, M.; Tepavicharova, M.; Diachenko, A.P.; Gutsul, T. A model for selection of a management team to ensure the sustainability and development of the business organizations. Entrep. Sustain. Issues 2019, 7, 690–703. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Muñoz-Pascual, L.; Galende, J.; Curado, C. Human Resource Management Contributions to Knowledge Sharing for a Sustainability-Oriented Performance: A Mixed Methods Approach. Sustainability 2019, 12, 161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Wiersema, M.F.; Bantel, K.A. Top management team demography and corporate strategic change. Acad. Manage. J. 1992, 35, 91–121. [Google Scholar]
- Tihanyi, L.; Ellstrand, A.E.; Daily, C.M.; Dalton, D.R. Composition of the top management team and firm international diversification. J. Manag. 2000, 26, 1157–1177. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Holtbrügge, D.; Oberhauser, M. CSR orientation of future top managers in India. J. Indian Bus. Res. 2019, 11, 162–178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Criado-Gomis, A.; Iniesta-Bonillo, M.Á.; Cervera-Taulet, A. Sustainable entrepreneurial orientation within an intrapreneurial context: Effects on business performance. Int. Entrep. Manag. J. 2018, 14, 295–308. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hussain, N.; Rigoni, U.; Orij, R.P. Corporate Governance and Sustainability Performance: Analysis of Triple Bottom Line Performance. J. Bus. Ethics 2018, 149, 411–432. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shrivastava, M.; Tamvada, J.P. Which green matters for whom? Greening and firm performance across age and size distribution of firms. Small Bus. Econ. 2019, 52, 951–968. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Masocha, R.; Fatoki, O. The Impact of Coercive Pressures on Sustainability Practices of Small Businesses in South Africa. Sustainability 2018, 10, 3032. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Prado, G.F.; Piekarski, C.M.; Luz, L.M.; Souza, J.T.; Salvador, R.; Francisco, A.C. Sustainable development and economic performance: Gaps and trends for future research. Sustain. Dev. 2019, sd.1982. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Martinez-Conesa, I.; Soto-Acosta, P.; Palacios-Manzano, M. Corporate social responsibility and its effect on innovation and firm performance: An empirical research in SMEs. J. Clean. Prod. 2017, 142, 2374–2383. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mullens, D. Entrepreneurial orientation and sustainability initiatives in family firms. J. Glob. Responsib. 2018, 9, 160–178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Roscoe, S.; Subramanian, N.; Jabbour, C.J.; Chong, T. Green human resource management and the enablers of green organisational culture: Enhancing a firm’s environmental performance for sustainable development. Bus. Strategy Environ. 2019. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Miles, M.P.; Munilla, L.S.; Darroch, J. Sustainable corporate entrepreneurship. Int. Entrep. Manag. J. 2009, 5, 65–76. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tseng, C.-H.; Chang, K.-H.; Chen, H.-W. Strategic Orientation, Environmental Innovation Capability, and Environmental Sustainability Performance: The Case of Taiwanese Suppliers. Sustainability 2019, 11, 1127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Filser, M.; Eggers, F. Entrepreneurial orientation and firm performance: A comparative study of Austria, Liechtenstein and Switzerland. S. Afr. J. Bus. Manag. 2014, 45, 55–65. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sung, C.; Park, J. Sustainability Orientation and Entrepreneurship Orientation: Is There a Tradeoff Relationship between Them? Sustainability 2018, 10, 379. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Beekaroo, D.; Callychurn, D.S.; Hurreeram, D.K. Developing a sustainability index for Mauritian manufacturing companies. Ecol. Indic. 2019, 96, 250–257. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
© 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Ameer, F.; Khan, N.R. Manager’s Age, Sustainable Entrepreneurial Orientation and Sustainable Performance: A Conceptual Outlook. Sustainability 2020, 12, 3196. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12083196
Ameer F, Khan NR. Manager’s Age, Sustainable Entrepreneurial Orientation and Sustainable Performance: A Conceptual Outlook. Sustainability. 2020; 12(8):3196. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12083196
Chicago/Turabian StyleAmeer, Farah, and Naveed R. Khan. 2020. "Manager’s Age, Sustainable Entrepreneurial Orientation and Sustainable Performance: A Conceptual Outlook" Sustainability 12, no. 8: 3196. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12083196
APA StyleAmeer, F., & Khan, N. R. (2020). Manager’s Age, Sustainable Entrepreneurial Orientation and Sustainable Performance: A Conceptual Outlook. Sustainability, 12(8), 3196. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12083196