Mindfulness and Next-Generation Members of Family Firms: A Source for Sustainability

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

Dear authors,

thank you very much for this interesting contribution.

the work needs to be enhanced. first of all, explaine better the sustainable aspect and underline the state of art in the literature. 

why carry out the analysis using the students? are we sure that the sample is representative?

I suggest to compare the study with similar analysis and enrich the discussion and the conclusions

Author Response

Dear Reviewer,

Thank you for recognizing the potential in our work and for giving us positive feedback on the manuscript. We have paid special attention to clarifying and elaborating our reasoning in aspects you have pointed out.

Thank you

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 2 Report

Weaknesses of the paper: discussion

The topic is interesting, but I have some thoughts for possible improvement which the authors may consider:

My recommendation, it is necessary to modify the discussion. The discussion is not adequately described. Discussion should be the evaluation of the obtained results (author's original thoughts) in the light of the previous research (could include the items as explanation of the hypothesis).

Author Response

Dear Reviewer,

We would like to thank you the insightful comments on the manuscript.

Please see the attachment with our revision.

Thank you

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 3 Report

First of all I would like to congratulate the author(s) on their work. I have enjoyed reading their material but they need to make some improvements. In this respect, please see the attached paper with comments and highlights.

Comments for author File: Comments.pdf

Author Response

Dear Reviewer,

We would like to thank you for your interest and time reviewing our study.

Please, see the attachment with the proposal to your suggestions.

Thank you

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 4 Report

The text makes a couple of statements such as this one:

However, the differences did not reach statistical significance (p > 0.05),

I think that it would be (p < 0.05). 

Please make sure of this

Author Response

Dear Reviewer,

We would like to thank you for your interest and time in reviewing our study.

Please see the attachment with our proposals to your comments.

Thank you

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Round 2

Reviewer 1 Report

Dear authors, thak you vary much for your interesting contribution . It is accettable at the present form.

Reviewer 2 Report

The paper is accepted in present form.