Exploring Countermeasures from a Psychological Perspective to Create a Safe Driving Environment for Personal Mobility Devices
Abstract
:1. Introduction
2. Literature Review
3. Data
3.1. Descriptive Statistics of Respondents
3.2. Psychological Perspectives of PM Device Driving
4. Analysis
4.1. Reliability Analysis
4.2. Model Estimation
- “Perception of PM device → Infrastructure” (B = 0.3, t = 5.973 **)
- “Perception of PM device → Easy to drive/handle” (B = 0.267, t = 5.441 **)
- Perception of PM device → Legal system” (B = 0.293, t = 6.479 **)
- “Perception of PM device → Intention to use in the future” (B = 0.561, t = 14.28 **)
- “Easy to drive/handle → Safety equipment” (B = 0.135, t = 2.161 *)
- “Easy to drive/handle→ Safety system” (B = 0.146, t = 2.436 *)
- “Perception of PM device → Safety equipment” (B = −0.15; t = −2.818 **)
- “Perception of PM device → Safety system” (B = −0.161, t = −3.335 **)
- “Legal system → Safety equipment” (B = −0.315, t = −5.071 **)
- “Legal system → Safety systems” (B = −0.27, t = −4.496 **)
5. Discussion
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Shin, H.; Jung, K.; Lee, J.; Park, S.; Kim, S.; Yang, S. Support Project for Micro Mobility Transport Policy; The Korea Transport Institute: Sejong, Korea, 2017. [Google Scholar]
- Ji, W.; Park, K.; Yoon, J. Bicycle Lane Enhancement Measures for Increasing Use of Personal Mobilities; Gyeonggi Research Institute: Suwon, Korea, 2018. [Google Scholar]
- Song, J.; Ryu, I.; Lee, S.; Choi, K. A Study on Personal Mobility User Characteristics and Cognitive Response Time. In Proceedings of the Korean Society of Transportation Academic Conference, Seoul, Korea, 10 November 2019. [Google Scholar]
- CEVEQ. Centre for Electric Vehicle Experimentation in Quebec. Pilot Project for Evaluating Motorized Personal Transportation Device: Segways and Electric Scooters; CEVEQ: Montreal, QC, Canada, 2004. [Google Scholar]
- Landis, B.W.; Theodore, A.P.; Herman, F.H. Characteristics of Emerging Road and Trail Users and Their Safety; The Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) Research, Development, and Technology Turner-Fairbank Highway Research Center: McLean, VA, USA, 2004. [Google Scholar]
- Darmochwal, A.; Topp, H.H. Segway in Public Spaces: Evaluation of the Saarland Pilot Trial with Regard to the Usage Compatibility and the Road Traffic Regulatory Handling of These Special Transport Devices; Institute for Mobility & Transport: Lisbon, Portugal, 2006; Available online: https://www.ft.dk/samling/20061/almdel/tru/bilag/560/392826.pdf (accessed on 20 February 2021).
- Kühn, G. Assessing the Safety Characteristics of the Segway; German Insurance Association: Berlin, Germany, 2009. [Google Scholar]
- Yu, H. Modeling pedestrians’ subjective danger perception toward personal mobility vehicles. Transp. Res. Part F Traffic Psychol. Behav. 2018, 56, 256–267. [Google Scholar]
- Sosik, J.J.; Kahai, S.S.; Piovoso, M.J. Silver bullet or voodoo statistics? A primer for using the partial least squares data analytic technique in Group and Organization Research. Group Organ. Manag. 2009, 34, 5–36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ringle, C.M.; Sarstedt, M.; Straub, D.W. A critical look at the use of PLS-SEM in MIS quarterly. MIS Q. 2012, 36, iii–xiv. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Peng, D.X.; Lai, F. Using partial least squares in operations management research: A practical guideline and summary of past research. J. Oper. Manag. 2012, 30, 467–480. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hair, J.F.; Sarstedt, M.; Pieper, T.M.; Ringle, C.M. The use of partial least squares structural equation modeling in strategic management research: A review of past practices and recommendations for future applications. Long Range Plan. 2012, 45, 320–340. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hair, J.F.; Sarstedt, M.; Ringle, C.M.; Mena, J.A. An assessment of the use of partial least squares structural equation modeling in marketing research. J. Acad. Mark. Sci. 2012, 40, 414–433. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kaufmann, L.; Gaeckler, J. A structured review of partial least squares in supply chain management research. J. Purch. Supply Manag. 2015, 21, 259–272. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Richter, N.F.; Sinkovics, R.R.; Ringle, C.M.; Schlägel, C.M. A critical look at the use of SEM in international business research. Int. Mark. Rev. 2015, 33, 376–404. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nitzl, C. The use of partial least squares structural equation modelling (PLS-SEM) in management accounting research: Directions for future theory development. J. Account. Lit. 2016, 37, 19–35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ali, F.; Rasoolimanesh, S.M.; Sarstedt, M.; Ringle, C.M.; Ryu, K. An assessment of the use of partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM) in hospitality research. Int. J. Contemp. Hosp. Manag. 2018, 30, 514–538. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Ringle, C.M.; Sarstedt, M.; Mitchell, R.; Gudergan, S.P. Partial least squares structural equation modeling in HRM research. Int. J. Hum. Resour. Manag. Forthcom. 2019, 31, 1617–1643. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hair, J.F.; Rosher, J.J.; Sarstedt, M.; Ring, C.M. When to use and how to report the results of PLS-SEM. Eur. Bus. Rev. 2019, 31, 2–24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Item | Contents |
---|---|
Respondents | - Sex and Age, - Occupation, - Residence, - Possession of Vehicles |
Psychological Perspectives for PM Device Driving | - Perception of personal mobility device - Satisfaction with the driving environment of personal mobility device (infrastructure, ease of use, relevant laws, and systems) - Necessity for the driving environment (Safety equipment and system) - Intention of using personal mobility device in the future |
Category | Strongly Yes | Yes | Neutral | No | Strongly No | Total | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Well-known transport mode | N | 101 | 262 | 62 | 7 | 0 | 432 |
% | 23.4 | 60.6 | 14.4 | 1.6 | 0 | 100.0 | |
Useful as transport mode | N | 47 | 215 | 126 | 37 | 7 | 432 |
% | 10.9 | 49.8 | 29.2 | 8.6 | 1.6 | 100.0 | |
Eco-friendly transport mode | N | 56 | 211 | 140 | 23 | 2 | 432 |
% | 13.0% | 48.8% | 32.4 | 5.3 | 0.5 | 100 | |
Safe transport mode | N | 8 | 23 | 108 | 214 | 79 | 432 |
% | 1.9 | 5.3 | 25.0 | 49.5 | 18.3 | 100.0 | |
Easy to drive/handle | N | 29 | 211 | 162 | 28 | 2 | 432 |
% | 6.7 | 48.8 | 37.5 | 6.5 | 0.5 | 100.0 | |
Low-cost transport mode | N | 22 | 174 | 172 | 56 | 8 | 432 |
% | 5.1 | 40.3 | 39.8 | 13.0 | 1.9 | 100.0 |
Category | Very Necessary | Necessary | Usually | Unnecessary | Very Unnecessary | Total | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Speed limiter | N | 172 | 191 | 53 | 15 | 1 | 432 |
% | 39.8 | 44.2 | 12.3 | 3.5 | 0.2 | 100.0 | |
Helmet | N | 220 | 141 | 50 | 19 | 2 | 432 |
% | 50.9 | 32.6 | 11.6 | 4.4 | 0.5 | 100.0 | |
Headlight | N | 225 | 166 | 35 | 6 | - | 432 |
% | 52.1 | 38.4 | 8.1 | 1.4 | - | 100.0 |
Category | Very Necessary | Necessary | Usually | Unnecessary | Very Unnecessary | Total | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Operation of exclusive license system | N | 110 | 171 | 101 | 45 | 5 | 432 |
% | 25.5 | 39.6 | 23.4 | 10.4 | 1.2 | 100.0 | |
Mandatory completion of safety and driving training | N | 148 | 173 | 74 | 30 | 7 | 432 |
% | 34.3 | 40.0 | 17.1 | 6.9 | 1.6 | 100.0 | |
Mandatory wearing of safety devices | N | 193 | 159 | 59 | 17 | 4 | 432 |
% | 44.7 | 36.8 | 13.7 | 3.9 | 0.9 | 100.0 | |
Mandatory insurance subscription | N | 141 | 167 | 94 | 24 | 6 | 432 |
% | 32.6 | 38.7 | 21.8 | 5.6 | 1.4 | 100.0 | |
Age limit | N | 162 | 168 | 79 | 17 | 6 | 432 |
% | 37.5 | 38.9 | 18.3 | 3.9 | 1.4 | 100.0 |
Factor | Category | PM Recog. | Infra | Conv. | Legal | Safety Device | System | Intent. to Use | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Perception of PM device | ①Well-known transport mode | 0.424 | 0.061 | 0.138 | −0.065 | 0.140 | 0.083 | 0.339 | |
②Useful as transport mode | 0.790 | 0.168 | 0.189 | 0.175 | −0.168 | −0.174 | 0.536 | ||
③Eco-friendly transport mode | 0.737 | 0.186 | 0.213 | 0.173 | −0.095 | −0.095 | 0.480 | ||
④Safe transport mode | 0.757 | 0.326 | 0.141 | 0.366 | −0.340 | −0.350 | 0.376 | ||
⑤Easy to drive/handle | 0.622 | 0.196 | 0.213 | 0.124 | 0.036 | −0.019 | 0.336 | ||
⑥Low-cost transport mode | 0.698 | 0.171 | 0.268 | 0.157 | −0.035 | −0.024 | 0.316 | ||
Satisfaction level of driving environment | Infrastructure | ①Gradient | 0.248 | 0.600 | 0.290 | 0.304 | −0.052 | −0.092 | 0.189 |
②Bicycle road sign | 0.250 | 0.784 | 0.386 | 0.447 | −0.147 | −0.173 | 0.103 | ||
③Bicycle road Design specification | 0.251 | 0.823 | 0.399 | 0.451 | −0.141 | −0.149 | 0.168 | ||
④Bicycle road pavement condition | 0.140 | 0.715 | 0.329 | 0.364 | −0.047 | −0.109 | 0.045 | ||
⑤Bicycle road connectivity | 0.193 | 0.778 | 0.433 | 0.444 | −0.132 | −0.160 | 0.110 | ||
⑥Drivable space | 0.243 | 0.772 | 0.470 | 0.503 | −0.109 | −0.139 | 0.195 | ||
⑦Personal mobility additional facilities | 0.186 | 0.686 | 0.564 | 0.570 | −0.105 | −0.146 | 0.075 | ||
Convenience of use | ①PM Accessibility | 0.206 | 0.490 | 0.833 | 0.388 | −0.035 | −0.062 | 0.174 | |
②Connectivity with transportation | 0.140 | 0.400 | 0.732 | 0.353 | −0.032 | −0.014 | 0.062 | ||
③Carrying PM in public transportation | 0.157 | 0.457 | 0.774 | 0.446 | −0.118 | −0.088 | 0.049 | ||
④PM Economics | 0.294 | 0.338 | 0.714 | 0.297 | 0.027 | −0.011 | 0.124 | ||
Legal system | ①Law | 0.294 | 0.519 | 0.478 | 0.872 | −0.247 | −0.262 | 0.136 | |
②Insurance | 0.269 | 0.497 | 0.371 | 0.884 | −0.274 | −0.269 | 0.174 | ||
③Incentive | 0.155 | 0.453 | 0.415 | 0.796 | −0.161 | −0.147 | 0.032 | ||
④Maintenance and enforcement | 0.239 | 0.556 | 0.404 | 0.847 | −0.262 | −0.244 | 0.172 | ||
Necessity | Safety device | ①Speed limiter | −0.186 | −0.157 | −0.106 | −0.269 | 0.876 | 0.535 | −0.133 |
②Helmet | −0.195 | −0.114 | −0.007 | −0.226 | 0.874 | 0.666 | −0.188 | ||
③Headlight | −0.118 | −0.091 | 0.006 | −0.232 | 0.783 | 0.571 | −0.047 | ||
System | ①Operation of exclusive license system | −0.185 | −0.142 | −0.062 | −0.208 | 0.497 | 0.791 | −0.195 | |
②Mandatory completion of safety and driving training | −0.237 | −0.203 | −0.077 | −0.217 | 0.608 | 0.895 | −0.229 | ||
③Mandatory wearing of safety devices | −0.184 | −0.147 | −0.039 | −0.237 | 0.706 | 0.861 | −0.124 | ||
④Mandatory insurance subscription | −0.156 | −0.120 | −0.041 | −0.229 | 0.511 | 0.789 | −0.176 | ||
⑤Age limit | −0.096 | −0.143 | −0.021 | −0.268 | 0.460 | 0.684 | −0.087 | ||
Intention to use in the future | ①Willing to use after | 0.488 | 0.123 | 0.081 | 0.094 | −0.110 | −0.185 | 0.906 | |
②Willing to reuse | 0.524 | 0.154 | 0.128 | 0.132 | −0.103 | −0.172 | 0.926 | ||
③Recommended to others | 0.565 | 0.198 | 0.171 | 0.196 | −0.182 | −0.220 | 0.938 | ||
④Promotion possible | 0.519 | 0.177 | 0.127 | 0.165 | −0.159 | −0.180 | 0.901 | ||
Cronbach’s alpha | 0.782 | 0.861 | 0.766 | 0.875 | 0.806 | 0.865 | 0.938 | ||
DG.rho | 0.847 | 0.895 | 0.851 | 0.914 | 0.886 | 0.903 | 0.956 | ||
AVE | 0.466 | 0.548 | 0.584 | 0.723 | 0.715 | 0.652 | 0.842 |
Var. | 1 | 2(a) | 2(b) | 2(c) | 3(a) | 3(b) | 4 | √AVE | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Perception of PM device | 1 | 0.683 | |||||||
Satisfaction of PM driving environment | (a) Infrastructure | 0.30 | 1 | 0.740 | |||||
(b) Convenience of use | 0.27 | 0.56 | 1 | 0.765 | |||||
(c) Legal system | 0.29 | 0.60 | 0.49 | 1 | 0.851 | ||||
Necessity level for driving environment | (a) Safety equipment | −0.20 | −0.15 | −0.05 | −0.29 | 1 | 0.845 | ||
(b) Safety system | −0.22 | −0.19 | −0.06 | −0.28 | 0.69 | 1 | |||
Intention to use in the future | 0.57 | 0.18 | 0.14 | 0.17 | −0.16 | −0.21 | 1 | 0.918 |
Variables | R² | GoF | |
---|---|---|---|
Satisfaction level of driving environment | Infrastructure | 0.090 | 0.291 |
Convenience of use | 0.071 | ||
Legal system | 0.086 | ||
Necessity level for driving environment | Safety equipment | 0.112 | |
Safety system | 0.114 | ||
Intention to use in the future | 0.338 |
Category | B | s.e | t | p |
---|---|---|---|---|
Perception of PM device → Infrastructure | 0.300 | 0.050 | 5.973 | 0.000 *** |
Perception of PM device → Convenience of use | 0.267 | 0.049 | 5.441 | 0.000 *** |
Perception of PM device → Legal system | 0.293 | 0.045 | 6.479 | 0.000 *** |
Perception of PM device → Safety equipment | −0.150 | 0.053 | −2.818 | 0.005 ** |
Perception of PM device → Safety system | −0.161 | 0.048 | −3.335 | 0.001 ** |
Perception of PM device → Intention to use in the future | 0.561 | 0.039 | 14.280 | 0.000 *** |
Infrastructure → Safety equipment | 0.011 | 0.061 | 0.176 | 0.860 |
Infrastructure → Safety system | −0.061 | 0.057 | −1.080 | −0.720 |
Infrastructure → Intention to use in the future | 0.017 | 0.054 | 0.323 | 0.253 |
Convenience of use → Safety equipment | 0.135 | 0.062 | 2.161 | 0.031 * |
Convenience of use → Safety system | 0.146 | 0.060 | 2.436 | 0.015 * |
Convenience of use → Intention to use in the future | −0.009 | 0.064 | −0.139 | −0.111 |
Legal system → Safety equipment | −0.315 | 0.062 | −5.071 | 0.000 *** |
Legal system → Safety system | −0.270 | 0.060 | −4.496 | 0.000 *** |
Legal system → Intention to use in the future | −0.028 | 0.066 | −0.428 | −0.331 |
Safety equipment → Intention to use in the future | 0.029 | 0.063 | 0.465 | 0.642 |
Safety system → Intention to use in the future | −0.110 | 0.069 | −1.602 | −0.891 |
Path | B | s.e | t | p |
---|---|---|---|---|
Perception to PM device → Safety equipment | −0.203 | 0.049 | −4.109 | 0.000 *** |
Perception to PM device → Safety system | −0.219 | 0.049 | −4.494 | 0.000 *** |
Perception to PM device → Intention to use in the future | 0.574 | 0.034 | 17.032 | 0.000 *** |
Infrastructure → Intention to use in the future | 0.025 | 0.053 | 0.463 | 0.643 |
Convenience of use → Intention to use in the future | −0.021 | 0.061 | −0.343 | −0.269 |
Legal system → Intention to use in the future | −0.008 | 0.061 | −0.123 | −0.098 |
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. |
© 2021 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Kim, S.-H.; Lim, H.; Kim, J. Exploring Countermeasures from a Psychological Perspective to Create a Safe Driving Environment for Personal Mobility Devices. Sustainability 2021, 13, 5450. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13105450
Kim S-H, Lim H, Kim J. Exploring Countermeasures from a Psychological Perspective to Create a Safe Driving Environment for Personal Mobility Devices. Sustainability. 2021; 13(10):5450. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13105450
Chicago/Turabian StyleKim, Suk-Hee, Hyejin Lim, and Junghwa Kim. 2021. "Exploring Countermeasures from a Psychological Perspective to Create a Safe Driving Environment for Personal Mobility Devices" Sustainability 13, no. 10: 5450. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13105450
APA StyleKim, S. -H., Lim, H., & Kim, J. (2021). Exploring Countermeasures from a Psychological Perspective to Create a Safe Driving Environment for Personal Mobility Devices. Sustainability, 13(10), 5450. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13105450