Next Article in Journal
Evaluating and Enhancing the Robustness of Sustainable Neural Relationship Classifiers Using Query-Efficient Black-Box Adversarial Attacks
Previous Article in Journal
MedShard: Electronic Health Record Sharing Using Blockchain Sharding
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Dynamics and Drivers of Grasslands in the Eurasian Steppe during 2000–2014

1
Department of Ecology, School of Life Science, Nanjing University, Nanjing 210046, China
2
School of Environment and Planning, Liaocheng University, Liaocheng 252059, China
3
State Key Laboratory of Plateau Ecology and Agriculture, Qinghai University, Xining 810016, China
4
Institute of Geographic Sciences and Natural Resources Research, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Sustainability 2021, 13(11), 5887; https://doi.org/10.3390/su13115887
Submission received: 19 April 2021 / Revised: 11 May 2021 / Accepted: 12 May 2021 / Published: 24 May 2021

Abstract

The Eurasian steppe (EAS) is the largest contiguous grassland worldwide. Quantitative evaluations of the relative impacts of climate change and human activities on grasslands are significant for understanding grassland degradation mechanisms and controlling degraded grasslands. In this study, we analyzed the grassland productivity based on multiple forms of net primary productivity (NPP), including climate NPP (CNPP), actual NPP (ANPP), and human-caused NPP (HNPP) during 2000–2014. The results demonstrate that the average value of annual ANPP in the EAS was 47.36 gC/(m2·year), with a weak decrease (−0.02 gC/(m2·year)) during the study period. The area of grassland degradation account for 48.52% of the total grassland area in EAS, while the area of grassland recovery account for 51.48%. Restorative grassland was mainly distributed in Mongolia and China, while worse grassland was mainly distributed in the Kazakh steppe regions. Grassland degradation in China was mainly caused by climate change, whereas it was mainly caused by human activities in Mongolia. Grassland recovery in Kazakh steppe regions was mainly caused by human activities, but in Mongolia, it was mainly caused by climate change. Compared with temperature, precipitation played a more significant role on grassland productivity.
Keywords: Eurasian steppe; grassland dynamic; grassland degradation; major ecological projects; sustainable development of grassland Eurasian steppe; grassland dynamic; grassland degradation; major ecological projects; sustainable development of grassland

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Zhang, Y.; Wang, Q.; Wang, Z.; Li, J.; Xu, Z. Dynamics and Drivers of Grasslands in the Eurasian Steppe during 2000–2014. Sustainability 2021, 13, 5887. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13115887

AMA Style

Zhang Y, Wang Q, Wang Z, Li J, Xu Z. Dynamics and Drivers of Grasslands in the Eurasian Steppe during 2000–2014. Sustainability. 2021; 13(11):5887. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13115887

Chicago/Turabian Style

Zhang, Yanzhen, Qian Wang, Zhaoqi Wang, Jianlong Li, and Zengrang Xu. 2021. "Dynamics and Drivers of Grasslands in the Eurasian Steppe during 2000–2014" Sustainability 13, no. 11: 5887. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13115887

APA Style

Zhang, Y., Wang, Q., Wang, Z., Li, J., & Xu, Z. (2021). Dynamics and Drivers of Grasslands in the Eurasian Steppe during 2000–2014. Sustainability, 13(11), 5887. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13115887

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop