Next Article in Journal
Change in Classroom Dialogicity to Promote Cultural Literacy across Educational Levels
Next Article in Special Issue
Water Stress Affects the Some Morpho-Physiological Traits of Twenty Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) Genotypes under Field Condition
Previous Article in Journal
Knowledge System Supporting ITS Deployment
Previous Article in Special Issue
Investigation of Lithium Application and Effect of Organic Matter on Soil Health
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

The Application Potential of Hop Sediments from Beer Production for Composting

by
Michał Kopeć
1,
Monika Mierzwa-Hersztek
1,*,
Krzysztof Gondek
1,
Katarzyna Wolny-Koładka
2,
Marek Zdaniewicz
3 and
Aleksandra Suder
2
1
Department of Agricultural and Environmental Chemistry, University of Agriculture in Krakow, al. Mickiewicza 21, 31-120 Krakow, Poland
2
Department of Microbiology and Biomonitoring, University of Agriculture in Krakow, al. Mickiewicza 24/28, 30-059 Krakow, Poland
3
Department of Fermentation Technology and Microbiology, University of Agriculture in Krakow, ul. Balicka 122, 30-149 Krakow, Poland
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Sustainability 2021, 13(11), 6409; https://doi.org/10.3390/su13116409
Submission received: 8 April 2021 / Revised: 26 May 2021 / Accepted: 31 May 2021 / Published: 4 June 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Soil Use Management and Soil Health)

Abstract

:
The chemical composition of hop sediments from beer brewing and fermentation gives them the potential for further use. These wastes are not generated in large amounts, but the absence of proper characteristics may lead to processing errors. This study examines the possibility of using hop waste for aerobic biological transformation processes (composting). The study was carried out on two hop sediments from two different technological stages of beer production: hot trub and spent hops. Chemical, microbiological, and biochemical analyses were performed in the composted hop sediments, as was the assessment of phytotoxicity to Lepidium sativum L. The tested feedstocks were partially inhabited by microorganisms and thus safe from an epidemiological point of view, and they were not a source of microbial contamination. Inhibitory properties for plant development were found for hot trub, which most likely result from the organic compound content. If it is only a small portion of its biomass, the mineral composition of hot trub does not exclude the possibility of its composting. Spent hops were characterized by a significant total nitrogen content, which affected the composting process. Composting this sediment required the selection of substrates with a widely C:N ratio.

1. Introduction

Beer production generates at least two types of solid waste associated with the hops used. These are hot trub and spent hops resulting from dry hopping [1,2,3,4,5]. The estimated amount of filtration sediments generated by the brewing industry (waste code 020780) ranges between 0.55 and 2.61 kg·hL−1 of beer and totals 1.22 kg·hL−1 on average. Filtration sediments are considered to be the largest source of waste in a brewery (17.6 kg·hL−1), as on average they amount to 7% of the brewer’s grain mass [6]. It may seem that the amount of waste generated is not that large, but when considering the extent of beer consumption in Poland by one individual (1 hL·year−1), economic and environmental problems are very likely [4,7]. Streczyńska et al. [5] state that the value of solid wastes generated by 1 m3 of a finished beer product is much smaller than that reported a decade ago, and is now equal to 51.2 kg, including filtration sediments [6].
During the brewing of the hopped wort, some of the hop components (alpha acids) change their form from insoluble to soluble (iso-alpha acids). This favors the formation of beer bitterness and reduction of the nitrogen content in the wort [2]. Waste is usually separated by centrifuging or filtering the wort or through other processes [4]. The resulting waste differs in chemical composition, which is determined by the type of feedstock, the environment pH, and the time of brewing. Waste is very hydrated (water constitutes 85% of its volume) and, after drying, its components are on average as follows: carbon 50%, nitrogen 8%, and ash 2–5% [4,8]. As in the sediment, the concentration of both micro- and macro-elements in beer wort is not constant—it depends on the feedstock type, quantity, and quality [4]. Some studies [1] confirm that, due to the relatively high (but optimal for yeast) zinc content, the addition of hop sediment may support the fermentation process. However, it is necessary to separate the sediment and clarify the beer wort because of their importance for the rest of the process.
At a later stage, to provide a fresh hop aroma in the beer fermentation or aging process, so-called dry hopping is performed. The chemical composition of spent hops depends largely on the variety of hops used and their dosage form (cone, granules, etc.). Alpha acids in two forms were found in spent hops: non-isomerized forms (whose concentration was lower than the initial value) and iso-alpha forms. This is explained by the leaching of hop acids during long hours of exposure to the fermenting wort, and by the adsorption of the isomerized compounds found in the hopped wort on the surface of the dosed hop [3].
The application of hop sediments from the brewery is not very popular, mainly because of their bitter compounds, such as hops, which prevent their use in animal nutrition [7]. On the other hand, the literature gives examples of the use of hop sediments as a feed, but only as a 1–2% additive to brewers grains [6]. A high potential for the re-use of spent hops in the brewing process was found due to the content of α-acids and polyphenols. Hop residue may also be successfully used to produce natural, inexpensive repellents to fight pests on stored food. Given its high content of essential oils (mostly sesquiterpenes), Bedini et al. [9] suggested the use of this byproduct (low-cost feedstock) as an ecological alternative to synthetic repellents, protecting stored food products against insects. Many substances identified in this type of waste are considered semiochemicals. The worst solution for disposing of sediments from the brewery (which was still popular 10 years ago in Poland) is to direct them to the municipal sewage system. This increases the costs of wastewater treatment and is irrational from an ecological and economic point of view [6]. In the literature, the importance of sediments as a pharmaceutical and cosmetological raw material is noted [4,10].
Nevertheless, the recovery of waste through aerobic treatment seems to be the least problematic [6,7]. Changes in organic matter resulting from composting make it possible to obtain a product that is safe for the environment. The process can be further optimized and controlled by selecting substrates that will be appropriate for the recognized chemical composition and biological activity of hop waste. This study was aimed at determining the potential use of hop waste from various stages of beer production in the composting process.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Feedstocks

The study was carried out on samples of hop sediments and spent hops of Polish hop varieties obtained from an industrial brewery in accordance with the course of the technological process. Hot trub (HT) was the first material analyzed, followed by spent hops (SH). The analysis was aimed at determining the microbiological and chemical composition of hop sediments. The composted materials were further analyzed for respiratory activity and phytotoxicity to Lepidium sativum L. Composting on a laboratory scale was performed to verify the natural usefulness of hop sediments.

2.2. Composting Conditions—Experimental Set-Up

The composting process was carried out under controlled conditions, and lasted 90 days. The experiment comprised 3 treatments and the samples were run in triplicate:
  • I—Control (K; maize straw);
  • II—Hot trub (HT) + maize straw (K);
  • III—Spent hops (SH) + maize straw (K).
Hop sediments sampled from the brewery were mixed with maize straw in a 1:1 ratio calculated on a dry matter basis to obtain 2 kg of fresh mass. The maize substrate was selected because its chemical composition and C:N ratio were optimal for the process. The latter parameter changed after introducing sediments. The containers with the material were placed in a water bath and the following temperature regime was established for composting: the first 10 days: 60 °C; 11th–30th day: 50 °C, and 31st–90th day: 30 °C. In the composting period, the material was sampled 3 times every 30 days, then dried and analyzed. During composting, the material was aerated automatically for 8 cycles a day, every 3 h for 15 min (capacity of 600 L/h) and manually every second day. For the first 45 days of the experiment, the material moisture was maintained at 65%, and in the second half of the process, it was allowed to reach 40%.

2.3. Chemical Analysis

After composting, materials were sampled and dried at 105 °C for 24 h to determine their dry matter content by weight [11]. Samples of starting materials and composts were ashed in a chamber furnace at 450 °C for 12 h to determine their chemical composition. Subsequently, the ash was digested in diluted (1:2) HNO3 and the samples were put into flasks. Redistilled water was added to adjust the final sample volume to 50 mL. The ICP-OES method was used to determine the contents of studied elements in the resulting solutions. The following parameters were determined in the suspension of compost and water (1:10 ratio): pH potentiometrically (pH meter CP-505, Elmentron, Zabrze, Poland); electrical conductivity (EC) using the conductometer CCO-501 (Elmentron, Zabrze, Poland); total carbon and nitrogen contents with the use of a Vario MAX Cube analyzer equipped with an IR sensor (Vario MAX Cube, Elementar Analysensysteme, GmbH, Germany).

2.4. Microbiological Analyses

The applied serial dilution method designed by Koch [12,13] with numerous microbiological substrates allowed the establishment of the following groups of microorganisms in sediments: endospore and vegetative bacteria (Trypticasein Soy Lab Agar, Biocorp, Poland, grown at 37 °C for 24 h), actinomycetes (Actinomycete Isolation Lab Agar, Biocorp, Poland, grown at 28 °C for 7 days), mold fungi (Malt Extract Agar, Biocorp, Poland, grown at 28 °C for 5 days). Additionally, potentially pathogenic bacteria were evaluated: Staphylococcus spp. (MSA agar, Biocorp, Poland, grown at 37 °C for 24 h), Escherichia coli (TBX agar, Biocorp, Poland, grown at 44 °C for 24 h), Enterococcus faecalis (SB agar, Biocorp, Poland, grown at 37 °C for 48 h), Salmonella spp. and Shigella spp. (SS agar, Biocorp, Poland, grown at 37 °C for 24 h), Clostridium perfringens (SC agar, Biocorp, Poland, grown at 37 °C for 24 h). From an epidemiological point of view, the presence of these bacteria may compromise health and safety and is an important indicator of microbial contamination [14,15]. The dilution culture method was applied to determine the number of colony forming units (CFU) of microorganisms. The obtained values were converted into 1 g D.M. of the tested feedstock [16].

2.5. Respiratory Activity

Respiratory activity (the effect of CO2 changes in the closed vessel volume) of the starting and composted materials was determined by a manometric method, using an OxiTop measuring apparatus, in accordance with ISO 14855-1:2005 [17] (Figure 1). Samples used in the study had 40 g of fresh mass. The resulting samples’ dry matter content was determined after drying at 105 °C for 12 h [18].
The manometric measurement of respiratory activity of the studied materials involved the recording of pressure changes in closed containers in a continuous system (Figure 1). Pressure changes are proportional to the amount of oxygen consumed by the sample as a result of respiratory processes occurring within it [19,20]. The respiratory activity of each material was measured at different times (including a lag-phase period to stabilize conditions and the period of actual parameter measurements). The automatic recording of pressure changes took place every 30 min. The obtained equivalent CO2 quantities were absorbed by 1 mol∙dm−3 NaOH contained in the vessels. Respiratory activity was measured with the use of an installation of 1.0 dm3 measuring bottles with accessories, which were put into a thermostatic cabinet with a constant temperature of 25 °C (±0.1 °C) maintained. The data obtained were sent to the controller via an infrared interface and then to a PC with the use of the Achat OC program. The following formula was used to convert the respiratory activity values into dry matter data (1):
B A = M O 2 R × T   × V f r m B t   × | Δ p |   ( mg × O 2 × ( g × h ) 1
where BA is biological activity, MO2 is the molecular weight of oxygen (31,998 mg × mol−1), R is the universal gas constant (83.14 L·hPa (K·mol−1)−1, T is the measurement temperature (K), mBt is the dry mass weight in the composted material (kg), |Δp| is the pressure change (hPa), and Vfr is the free gas volume.
The growth of garden cress (Lepidium sativum L.) with sediment or compost extracts was analyzed. For this purpose, sediment and compost extracts (in a material:water ratio of 1:10, extraction for 24 h) were obtained in a closed vessel in which carbon dioxide was absorbed and manometric measurements performed (OxiTop® Control) [19,20]. A vacuum pump was used to 0.45 μm filter the extract. The control was in a vessel in which only redistilled water was used for the seedling growth test. The test was carried out on 0.268 g of seeds (i.e., 100 seeds of Lepidium sativum L.), and lasted 4 days. The results of the seedling growth tests were calculated using Equation (1) and presented in the form of regression equations of oxygen consumption 48 h after the addition of sediment extract, expressed in O2 × (g × h)−1.

2.6. Statistical Analysis

The statistical compilation of the results of chemical and biochemical analyses involved presentation of the arithmetic mean of replicates and standard deviation. This was also achieved by carrying out variance analysis and by synthesis using Tukey’s test method with the adopted significance level of p ≤ 0.05.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Chemical Composition of Hop Sediments before Composting

The pH, EC values, and chemical composition of the tested sediments are presented in Table 1. A lower pH was determined for the hot trub. A characteristic feature of the hot trub was a higher value of electric conductivity. This probably resulted from a greater content of leached potassium. The content of the tested elements in the hot trub was generally smaller or at a similar level to the content determined in the spent hops (SH) obtained at later stages of the process. The increased total content of copper and zinc in the technological process also deserves attention. The Cu content in the sediments was significantly higher compared to the content determined in the plant material used for beer production. The total copper content in the HT was over 20 times lower, and the total zinc content over 7 times lower, than in SH. These differences between sediments may have also resulted from changes occurring at different temperatures and from the environment of the vat material.
In the case of zinc, this was probably due to the supplementation of the fermentation process with ions of this element, which promotes the development of yeast [21]. Poreda et al. [21] state that the rate of Zn2+ extraction from malt is very low and 95% of Zn ions from feedstocks are removed with waste. The procedure modification proposed by the authors, consisting of the addition of Zn2+ salt only after a significant volume of clarified wort is removed from the whirlpool tank, retained almost 90% of the added Zn2+ ions.
When it comes to the biological processing of sediments, total nitrogen and carbon contents and their proportions are important in composting and biogasification technologies. Spent hops have a high nitrogen content and a low C:N ratio, which, in the composting process, suggests the need to supplement the material with a higher carbon content in relation to nitrogen. For hot trub, the C:N ratio is also incorrect, but its improvement theoretically requires a smaller material portion.

3.2. Microbiological Analysis

The microbiological analysis of hop sediments excluded the presence of virtually all the microorganisms tested for. Only vegetative bacteria were found in low numbers in the tested materials: 1387 CFU·g–1 D.M. (hot trub (HT)), 223,800 CFU·g–1 D.M. (spent hops (SH)). After 20 days of incubation, these materials respectively had counts of 1143 CFU·g−1 D.M. and 150,767 CFU·g–1 D.M. Based on these results, it can be concluded that the feedstocks tested are safe from an epidemiological point of view. These properties will influence the subsequent use of the hop sludge [22,23].

3.3. Respiratory Activity of Sediments before Composting

Under aerobic conditions, hydrated organic material will show varying respiratory activity resulting from microbial activity. The analyzed materials (HT and SH) had extremely different oxygen demands during incubation (Figure 2).
To assess respiratory activity, a regression straight line was drawn after rejection of the lag-phase time (36 h):
  • y(HT) = 0.136x − 0.9672 R2 = 0.9711;
  • y(SH) = 4.082x − 123.51 R2 = 0.9887.
The values of the equation’s directional coefficients differ from each other by 30 times, which confirms the high respiratory activity of spent hops and the inhibition of biochemical processes in the incubated hot trub. This is confirmed by microbiological tests on sediments.
In the case of filtration sediments from the brewery, the calculated oxygen demand is most likely due to the formation of CO2 caused by the lysis of dead cells. This makes the proposed method unsuitable for the interpretation of direct respiratory activity; therefore, the phytotoxicity assessment was adopted for further characterization of the sediments.
In order to verify the plant’s response to direct contact with sediment materials, a biological test was carried out based on the growth of garden cress in contact with aqueous sediment extract. The oxygen demand curves of germinating garden cress seedlings varied in the middle of the second day of plant growth (Figure 3). Both extracts were growth inhibitors compared to water; however, after the second day, the SH extract was not phytotoxic. Plant germination was inhibited in contact with HT extract, and after 4 days only single germinated seeds were found.
The effect of extracts was assessed on the basis of oxygen demand regression straight lines drawn for garden cress for the third and fourth day of measurements:
  • y(control) = 1.414x − 29.725 R2 = 0.9899;
  • y(HT) = 0.454x + 0.286 R2 = 0.9942;
  • y(SH) = 1.458x − 49.967 R2 = 0.9993.
The values of the equation’s directional coefficients for treatments with seeds in contact with water or spent hops extracts are similar (1.414 and 1.458, respectively), which indicates that there were no differences in garden cress growth. The directional coefficient value of the equation describing the oxygen demand in the treatment with HT extract was one-third the value of the other two, which confirms a significant inhibitory effect on garden cress growth.
Slight differences in mineral composition and pH were found between the extracts (Table 2). It is worth noting the inverted ratio of monovalent to divalent cations and the greater share of hydronium ions in the HT extract. However, the effect of unanalyzed organic components cannot be excluded.

3.4. Respiratory Activity of the Composted Hop Sediments

The composting process was carried out on hop sediments mixed with maize straw. The largest changes involving carbon oxidation took place within the first 30 days of composting (Table 3). They were statistically significant between treatments. After another 30 days, carbon losses were even higher, although they were insignificant in the case of maize and hot trub. The lack of significant differences in the dry matter residue between the 60th and 90th day indicates the inhibition of respiratory processes in all treatments. This was confirmed by the measurement of respiratory activity between the 85th and 90th day, which corresponds to the AT4 parameter (respiratory activity over 4 days = 96 h). The trend lines of equations and their solutions are as follows:
  • y(K) = 0.0002x + 0.0023 for x = 96 y = 0.0215 mg O2·g−1 D.M.;
  • y(K + HT) = (4 × 105)x + 0.0015 for x = 96 y = 0.00534 mg O2·g−1 D.M.;
  • y(K + SH) = (8 × 10−5)x + 0.0024 for x = 96 y = 0.01008 mg O2·g−1 D.M., where K is maize straw.
AT4 values are extremely small, but they confirm the relationship between the measurements of substrates (hop sediments) made before composting. The major changes that occurred in the organic material during composting related to the carbon:nitrogen ratio (Table 4). After composting, carbon loss caused higher nitrogen concentrations. The largest changes were observed after composting maize.
The adopted maize:hop sediment ratio in the composted mixtures did not allow them to achieve the required C:N ratio, which was below 30. The high nitrogen content in sediments reduced the C:N ratio to 27.9 for HT and 15.6 for SH. Unfortunately, these values are considered incorrect for composting [23]. A structural material with a much higher C:N ratio is required for composting hop sediments, which are rich in nitrogen. This could be straw or sawdust, for instance. A significant decrease in the C:N ratio during composting was reported in all treatments in relation to the starting material. The largest C:N ratio reduction was recorded in the first composting period (up to day 30). Subsequent changes in all treatments had no statistical significance.

4. Conclusions

  • Hop sediments produced at various stages of the brewing process differ significantly in chemical and biological reactivity, which affects their possible biological processing.
  • Hop sediments were free from microbiological contamination that may pose an epidemiological threat.
  • The SH sediment was very rich in total nitrogen (50 g/kg D.M.), which affected the composting process. Composting this sediment required the selection of substrates with a wide C:N ratio. However, the sediment is suitable for biological processing.
  • In the case of HT, plant growth inhibitory properties were found both before and after composting, which were most likely not due to the mineral composition. Organic compounds and the sterilization of the substrate as a result of wort boiling may be inhibitors of biological changes.
  • Stable compost with hop sediments could be obtained after 60 days of an intensive aerobic transformation, with the appropriate quantitative and qualitative selection of substrates. In the last 4 days of the experiment, the oxygen demand was very low and amounted to below 0.0215 mg O2 g−1 D.M.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization: M.K., M.M.-H., M.Z., and K.G.; methodology: M.K., M.M.-H., K.W.-K., and K.G.; software: M.K.; validation: M.K., M.M.-H., and K.G.; formal analysis: M.K.; investigation: M.K., M.M.-H., M.Z., K.W.-K., and K.G.; resources: M.K.; data curation: M.K., M.M.-H., K.W.-K., and K.G.; writing—original draft preparation: M.K.; writing—review and editing: M.K., M.M.-H., M.Z., K.W.-K., K.G., and A.S.; visualization: M.K.; supervision: M.K., M.M.-H., M.Z., K.W.-K., and K.G.; project administration: M.Z.; funding acquisition: M.Z. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was financially supported by Grant LIDER 46/0185/L-9/17/NCBR/2018.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Schisler, D.O.; Ruocco, J.J.; Mabee, M.S. Wort trub content and its effects on fermentation and beer flavor. J. Am. Soc. Brew. Chem. 1982, 40, 57–61. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Mathias, T.R.D.S.; de Mello, P.P.M.; Sérvulo, E.F.C. Solid wastes in brewing process: A review. J. Brew. Distill. 2014, 5, 1–9. [Google Scholar]
  3. Oladokun, O.; James, S.; Cowley, T.; Smart, K.; Hort, J.; Cook, D. Dry-hopping: The effects of temperature and hop variety on the bittering profiles and properties of resultant beers. Brew. Sci. 2017, 70, 187–196. [Google Scholar]
  4. Sterczyńska, M.; Stachnik, M. Technical and technological aspects of clarifying beer wort. Food Process Eng. 2017, 4, 24–27. [Google Scholar]
  5. Sterczyńska, M.; Stachnik, M.; Poreda, A.; Jakubowski, M. Hot sludge—Waste material in the production of clear beer wort. Food Process Eng. 2018, 2, 36–41. [Google Scholar]
  6. Guidelines on the Use of by-Products and Recommended Waste Management in Agriculture and the Agri-Food Industry; Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Development, Falenty—Warsaw Institute of Technology and Life Sciences: Warsaw, Poland, 2010; p. 103.
  7. Kerby, C.; Vriesekoop, F. An overview of the utilisation of brewery by-products as generated by british craft breweries. Beverages 2017, 3, 24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  8. Mathias, T.R.D.S.; Alexandre, V.M.F.; Cammarota, M.C.; de Mello, P.P.M.; Sérvulo, E.F.C. Characterization and determination of brewer’s solid wastes composition. J. Inst. Brew. 2015, 121, 400–404. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  9. Bedini, S.; Flamini, G.; Girardi, J.; Cosci, F.; Conti, B. Not just for beer: Evaluation of spent hops (Humulus lupulus L.) as a source of eco-friendly repellents for insect pests of stored foods. J. Pest Sci. 2015, 88, 583–592. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Pal, J.; Piotrowska, A.; Adamiak, J.; Czerwińska-Ledwig, O. P Beer and brewing raw materials in cosmetology as well as beer baths as a treatment form. Postępy Fitoter. 2019, 20, 145–153. [Google Scholar]
  11. Ostrowska, A.; Gawliński, S.; Szczubiałka, Z. (Eds.) Methods of Analysis and Evaluation of Soil Properties and Plant—Catalogue; Institute of Environmental Protection: Warsaw, Poland, 1991; p. 331. (In Polish) [Google Scholar]
  12. Notes and Memoranda: Dr. Koch’s New Method of Pure Cultivation of Bacteria. J. Cell Sci. 1881, 2–21, 650–654.
  13. Koch, R. Sechster Bericht der deutschen wissenschaftlichen Commission zur Erforschung der Cholera. Dtsch. Med. Wochenscrift 1884, 10, 191–192. [Google Scholar]
  14. Wolny-Koładka, K.; Żukowski, W. Mixed municipal solid waste hygienisation for refuse-derived fuel production by ozonation in the novel configuration using fluidized bed and horizontal reactor. Waste Biomass Valorization 2019, 10, 575–583. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Malinowski, M.; Wolny-Koładka, K.; Vaverková, M.D. Effect of biochar addition on the OFMSW composting process under real conditions. Waste Manag. 2019, 84, 364–372. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Malinowski, M.; Wolny-Koładka, K. Microbiological and energetic assessment of the effects of the biodrying of fuel produced from waste. Ecol. Chem. Eng. 2017, 24, 551–564. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  17. ISO 14855-1:2005. Determination of the Ultimate Aerobic Biodegradability of Plastic Materials under Controlled Composting Conditions—Method by Analysis of Evolved Carbon Dioxide—Part 1: General Method; International Organization for Standardization: Genève, Switzerland, 2005. [Google Scholar]
  18. Jindo, K.; Sonoki, T.; Matsumoto, K.; Canellas, L.; Roig, A.; Sanchez-Monedero, M.A. Influence of biochar addition on the humic substances of composting manures. Waste Manag. 2016, 49, 545–552. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. OxiTop®. Measuring System; Wageningen University and NMI: Wageningen, The Netherlands, 2003; p. 13. [Google Scholar]
  20. Kopeć, M.; Baran, A.; Mierzwa-Hersztek, M.; Gondek, K.; Chmiel, M.J. Effect of the addition of biochar and coffee grounds on the biological properties and ecotoxicity of composts. Waste Biomass Valorization 2018, 9, 1389–1398. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  21. Poreda, A.; Stefaniuk, K.; Hoc, J.; Zdaniewicz, M. Improving the efficiency of malt wort supplementation with zinc ions. Ferment. Fruit Veg. Ind. 2014, 2, 4–8. [Google Scholar]
  22. Oszust, K.; Frąc, M.; Gryta, A.; Bilińska, N. The influence of ecological and conventional plant production systems on soil microbial quality under hops (Humulus lupulus). Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2014, 15, 9907–9923. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Kopeć, M.; Mierzwa-Hersztek, M.; Gondek, K.; Wolny-Koładka, K.; Zdaniewicz, M.; Jarosz, R. Biological activity of composts obtained from hop waste generated during the brewing. Biomass Convers. Biorefinery 2020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. OxiTop® Control measuring set for respiratory activity.
Figure 1. OxiTop® Control measuring set for respiratory activity.
Sustainability 13 06409 g001
Figure 2. Experimental values (n = 360) showing changes in the respiratory activity of hops over a period of 96 h.
Figure 2. Experimental values (n = 360) showing changes in the respiratory activity of hops over a period of 96 h.
Sustainability 13 06409 g002
Figure 3. Experimental values (n = 360) showing changes in oxygen demand over 96 h of garden cress growth.
Figure 3. Experimental values (n = 360) showing changes in oxygen demand over 96 h of garden cress growth.
Sustainability 13 06409 g003
Table 1. Electrical conductivity, pH, and total element content in hop sediments.
Table 1. Electrical conductivity, pH, and total element content in hop sediments.
ParameterUnitHTSH
pH (1:10) 4.96 (0.09)5.19 (0.08)
EC (1:10) *mS·cm−11.855 (0.06)1.282 (0.08)
Ng·kg−127.84 (0.12)49.96 (0.35)
Cg·kg−1522.9 (10.5)490.3 (8.20)
C:N ratio 18.789.81
Total Nag·kg−10.12 (0.00)0.10 (0.00)
Total Kg·kg−19.92 (0.26)4.67 (0.05)
Total Mgg·kg−12.41 (0.03)4.39 (0.01)
Total Cag·kg−18.04 (0.05)9.08 (0.01)
Total Pg·kg−13.36 (0.12)9.36 (0.05)
Total Cdmg·kg−10.03 (0.00)0.10 (0.00)
Total Crmg·kg−10.68 (0.07)0.64 (0.09)
Total Cumg·kg−15.74 (0.05)124.88 (2.01)
Total Femg·kg−1314.75 (9.55)307.25 (17.00)
Total Mnmg·kg−137.68 (0.57)48.34 (0.05)
Total Nimg·kg−11.10 (0.00)0.44 (0.02)
Total Pbmg·kg−10.45 (0.00)0.53 (0.07)
Total Znmg·kg−130.13 (0.21)216.48 (0.78)
* EC: electrical conductivity; standard deviation is given in brackets; n = 3.
Table 2. Mineral composition of extracts used for the germination test.
Table 2. Mineral composition of extracts used for the germination test.
ParameterUnitControlHT ExtractSH Extract
pH-6.27 (0.09) **4.70 (0.21)5.64 (0.11)
ECmS·cm−10.062 (0.002)0.478 (0.010)0.275 (0.020)
Naµg·cm−30.575 (0.021)3.591 (0.054)2.928 (0.092)
Kµg·cm−38.321 (0.321)134.4 (0.028)51.89 (0.120)
Mgµg·cm−30.208 (0.011)16.44 (0.087)36.93 (0.890)
Caµg·cm−32.634 (0.121)18.93 (0.08)37.25 (0.43)
Pµg·cm−31.215 (0.012)37.16 (0.07)89.62 (1.23)
Cdµg·cm−30.001 (0.001)0.001 (0.001)0.001 (0.001)
Crµg·cm−30.001 (0.001)0.005 (0.001)0.004 (0.001)
Cuµg·cm−3nd *0.008 (0.001)0.057 (0.009)
Feµg·cm−30.010 (0.001)0.109 (0.001)0.083 (0.003)
Mnµg·cm−30.072 (0.002)0.183 (0.002)0.252 (0.019)
Niµg·cm−30.002 (0.001)0.001 (0.001)0.001 (0.001)
Pbµg·cm−30.004 (0.001)0.005 (0.001)0.008 (0.001)
Znµg·cm−30.106 (0.003)0.124 (0.009)0.177 (0.019)
* nd: not determined; ** standard deviation is given in brackets; n = 3.
Table 3. Relative changes in dry matter residue (% relative to starting material) during the composting process.
Table 3. Relative changes in dry matter residue (% relative to starting material) during the composting process.
TreatmentDay of Composting
0306090
K100 a,*32.14 f23.36 g22.77 g
K + HT100 a56.89 b55.61 b,c53.62 c
K + SH100 a48.26 d41.67 e40.65 e
* Each value represents the mean of three replicates; different letters within a column indicate a significant difference at p ≤ 0.05 according to Tukey’s HSD test; factor: time × sediment.
Table 4. Contents of nitrogen and carbon (g·kg−1) during composting (on start day, and after day 30, 60, and 90).
Table 4. Contents of nitrogen and carbon (g·kg−1) during composting (on start day, and after day 30, 60, and 90).
ParameterProcess DayKK + HTK + SH
Total N010.5 a18.4 a30.4 b
3031.2 b33.0 b45.1 c,d
6036.3 b,c32.2 b49.5 d
9037.6 b,c33.8 b52.0 d
Total C0429.8 a,b513.8 e475.3 b,c,d,e
30426.4 a,b,c494.3 e462.5 c,d,e
60406.7 a,b483.2 d,e458.0 c,d,e
90386.3 a482.6 d,e434.9 a,b,c,d
C:N ratio040.9 e27.9 d15.6 c
3013.6 b,c15.0 c10.2 a,b,c
6011.2 a,b,c14.9 c9.3 a,b
9010.3 a,b,c14.3 b,c8.4 a
Each value represents the mean of three replicates ± standard deviation. Different letters within a column indicate a significant difference at p ≤ 0.05 according to Tukey’s HSD test; factor: time × sediment.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Kopeć, M.; Mierzwa-Hersztek, M.; Gondek, K.; Wolny-Koładka, K.; Zdaniewicz, M.; Suder, A. The Application Potential of Hop Sediments from Beer Production for Composting. Sustainability 2021, 13, 6409. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13116409

AMA Style

Kopeć M, Mierzwa-Hersztek M, Gondek K, Wolny-Koładka K, Zdaniewicz M, Suder A. The Application Potential of Hop Sediments from Beer Production for Composting. Sustainability. 2021; 13(11):6409. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13116409

Chicago/Turabian Style

Kopeć, Michał, Monika Mierzwa-Hersztek, Krzysztof Gondek, Katarzyna Wolny-Koładka, Marek Zdaniewicz, and Aleksandra Suder. 2021. "The Application Potential of Hop Sediments from Beer Production for Composting" Sustainability 13, no. 11: 6409. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13116409

APA Style

Kopeć, M., Mierzwa-Hersztek, M., Gondek, K., Wolny-Koładka, K., Zdaniewicz, M., & Suder, A. (2021). The Application Potential of Hop Sediments from Beer Production for Composting. Sustainability, 13(11), 6409. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13116409

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop