Public Policy Analysis on Watershed Governance in Indonesia

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

Table 1. Summary of empirical literature review related to the institutional fit of IWRM and river basin doesn't particularly contribute much to the paper, I would recommend it be removed. Line 213 "many interests between stakeholders" doesn't really explain why the research is needed, do you mean to say "many competing", "many diverse", "many conflicting",etc? As is does not make sense. Fig 3. needs to be translated. Fig 4 is very difficult to read, please either make larger or present an alternative method for presenting this data. Table 2 title needs to be translated "Tabel 2. Persentase konten regulasi manajemen DAS Brantas di Indonesia".  Fig 7 is also difficult to read. Overall your results section, specially your figures, need to be presented in a form that is more accessible to the reader (much small lettering and repetitive information). Literature Review section could also be tighten up, specially Table 1, which I don't think is necessary. 

Author Response

Table 1, authors has been deleted and fix the manuscript

Line 213 authors have revised it
Figure 3,4, and 7,  authors have added as suggested

Literature review have revised as suggested

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Reviewer 2 Report

This research has potential. The conveyance of results in more specificity will improve the paper. See my comments attached.

Comments for author File: Comments.docx

Author Response

The literature has been improved

The last paragraph of the introduction has revised as suggested

Authors has been improved the list references

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Round 2

Reviewer 2 Report

The additional written materials help clarify things.

See my comments on the attached file.

Comments for author File: Comments.docx

Author Response

Dear editor

We have fixed several points of revision 

Best Regards
Authors

 

Author Response File: Author Response.docx