Next Article in Journal
E-Commerce Calls for Cyber-Security and Sustainability: How European Citizens Look for a Trusted Online Environment
Next Article in Special Issue
Classification of Recreation Opportunity Spectrum Using Night Lights for Evidence of Humans and POI Data for Social Setting
Previous Article in Journal
A Rapid Review on Community Connected Microgrids
Previous Article in Special Issue
Online Analytics for Shrimp Farm Management to Control Water Quality Parameters and Growth Performance
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Dengue Transmission Mapping with Weather-Based Predictive Model in Three Southernmost Provinces of Thailand

by
Teerawad Sriklin
,
Siriwan Kajornkasirat
* and
Supattra Puttinaovarat
Faculty of Science and Industrial Technology, Prince of Songkla University, Surat Thani Campus, Surat Thani 84000, Thailand
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Sustainability 2021, 13(12), 6754; https://doi.org/10.3390/su13126754
Submission received: 11 May 2021 / Revised: 10 June 2021 / Accepted: 11 June 2021 / Published: 15 June 2021

Abstract

:
This study aimed to show maps and analyses that display dengue cases and weather-related factors on dengue transmission in the three southernmost provinces of Thailand, namely Pattani, Yala, and Narathiwat provinces. Data on the number of dengue cases and weather variables including rainfall, rainy day, mean temperature, min temperature, max temperature, relative humidity, and air pressure for the period from January 2015 to December 2019 were obtained from the Bureau of Epidemiology, Ministry of Public Health and the Meteorological Department of Southern Thailand, respectively. Spearman rank correlation test was performed at lags from zero to two months and the predictive modeling used time series Poisson regression analysis. The distribution of dengue cases showed that in Pattani and Yala provinces the most dengue cases occurred in June. Narathiwat province had the most dengue cases occurring in August. The air pressure, relative humidity, rainfall, rainy day, and min temperature are the main predictors in Pattani province, while air pressure, rainy day, and max/mean temperature seem to play important roles in the number of dengue cases in Yala and Narathiwat provinces. The goodness-of-fit analyses reveal that the model fits the data reasonably well. The results provide scientific information for creating effective dengue control programs in the community, and the predictive model can support decision making in public health organizations and for management of the environmental risk area.

1. Introduction

Dengue fever (DF) is a major communicable disease and it is a continual public health problem, with mosquitoes carrying the disease. Globally, about 500,000 severe dengue cases with 12,500 deaths are reported annually [1]. The World Health Organization (WHO) estimates that about 100 million DF infections occur annually and that approximately 2.5 billion people live in countries where dengue is endemic [1]. Dengue viruses are transmitted mainly by Aedes aegypti and possibly by Ae. albopictus in tropical and sub-tropical areas [2]. Dengue has become endemic in nearly 100 countries in Africa, the Americas, the Eastern Mediterranean, Southeast Asia, and the Western Pacific [3]. Thailand reported its first experience of dengue fever in 1949 [4] and the first outbreak of dengue hemorrhagic fever (DHF) was reported in Bangkok in 1958 [4].
In 2019, the number of dengue fever cases in all regions of Thailand was 131,157 with 197.27 cases per 100,000 population and 142 deaths (mortality rate of 0.21 per 100,000 population). In the southern region, 17,167 cases with 181.20 cases per 100,000 population and 31 deaths (mortality rate of 0.33 per 100,000 population) were reported [5]. When considered in the southern region, the mortality rate was higher than the total rate for all regions of Thailand. In Pattani province, there were 1264 dengue cases with a morbidity rate of 175.17 per 100,000 population. In Yala province, 1440 dengue cases and a morbidity rate of 269.50 per 100,000 population were reported. There were 2088 dengue cases (morbidity rate of 259.30 per 100,000 population) in Narathiwat province [5].
The southern region of Thailand is different from its other regions, for this peninsular part consists of seaside and mountainous areas. Thailand is classified as a tropical region with high temperatures and rainy weather all year round. The heaviest rainfalls on the west side of the southern region are caused by the southwest monsoon, from June to October, while the northeast monsoon prevailing during mid-October to mid-February, causes heavy rainfall on the eastern side of the peninsula. The average number of rainy days is 148.7 days per year and the average rainfall is 1781.7 mm per year [6]. These weather conditions are very favorable to mosquito breeding [7].
The factors related to the spread of these diseases have been documented by studies completed in Nakhon Si Thammarat and Patthalung provinces of Thailand [8], as well as in Indonesia [9] and Taiwan [10]. Weather parameters have widely been studied as substantial factors that need to be considered for better understanding of dengue transmission worldwide [8,9,11,12]. In recent decades, weather variables such as temperature, rainfall, and relative humidity have been widely studied for their potential to provide an early warning of dengue transmission [13] also in Thailand [11,14], Malaysia [3], and Indonesia [9]. Spatiotemporal modeling is important for predicting the risk of dengue fever in several localities, including Puerto Rico [15], Venezuela [12], and Thailand [11].
In this study, we aim to show maps and analyses that display dengue cases and weather-related factors in the three southernmost provinces of Thailand, namely, Pattani, Yala, and Narathiwat provinces, as well as the effects of weather on dengue transmission using data from 2015–2019 with a predictive model, fit with time series Poisson regression approach. Finally, an early warning system with a weather-based predictive model is an essential tool for providing scientific information for effective dengue prevention and control programs.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Study Areas

In this study, we selected the three southernmost provinces of Thailand (Figure 1a,b) for the study areas, consisting of Pattani, Yala, and Narathiwat provinces. Southern Thailand is on the Malay Peninsula with an area of around 70,714 km2, bounded to the north by Kra Isthmus, the narrowest part of the peninsula. Pattani coastline faces the Gulf of Thailand to the north. The south is dominated by the Sankalakhiri Mountain Range, which includes Budo-Su-ngai Padi National Park, on the border with Yala and Narathiwat. Yala is the southernmost province of Thailand and is one of two landlocked provinces in Southern Thailand. Its southern part borders on Kedah and Perak of Malaysia. Narathiwat is on the Gulf of Thailand. To the south, it borders on the Malaysian states of Kelantan and Perak. The study areas are located near the seaside and mountainous areas, with high temperatures and rainfall throughout the year. The weather is influenced by the northeast monsoon that occurs from mid-October to mid-February. Regarding the topographic characteristics of the central and southern study areas, the region has the Sankalakiri Mountain Range (Yala and Narathiwat) resting in the east–west direction and a border between Thailand and Malaysia. To the east is a river basin stretching to the coast of the Gulf of Thailand in Pattani and Narathiwat provinces.

2.2. Data Collection

The computerized data set on monthly dengue fever cases from January 2015 to December 2019 in the three southernmost provinces of Thailand (i.e., Pattani, Yala, and Narathiwat provinces) were obtained from the Bureau of Epidemiology, Ministry of Public Health. Weather data for the same period were collected from the Meteorological Department of Southern Thailand as regards rainfall, rainy day, mean temperature, minimum temperature, maximum temperature, relative humidity, and air pressure (Figure 2).
The amount of rainfall, the number of rainy days, relative humidity, and air pressure were collected from 12 weather stations in Pattani, 8 stations in Yala, and 13 stations in Narathiwat, covering all the districts in the studied provinces (1 station/district). Mean temperature, minimum temperature, and maximum temperature were collected from a single weather station in each province. Then, the averages of the amount of rainfall, the number of rainy days, relative humidity, and air pressure in each province were used to represent the weather data for each province. The weather data used in data analysis match the number of data records and dimension of dengue fever data.
The monthly number of dengue cases by province were collected from the Bureau of Epidemiology, Ministry of Public Health, through the dengue cases report in Thailand via the website https://apps.doe.moph.go.th/boe/org.php (accessed on 6 January 2020). The user can access the system and select the year for downloading the data. For requesting the weather data in the southern region of Thailand, the user can access the system via the website http://www.songkhla.tmd.go.th/service_main.php (accessed on 8 November 2019). The system provided the service for requesting 5 years of weather data using the user provided identifier information (i.e., name, parameter, time period, and location: name of district and province).

2.3. Data Analysis

For data pre-processing, the raw data of dengue cases in rich text format (RFT) and the raw weather data in Microsoft Excel Open XML Spreadsheet (XLSX) file were converted to comma-separated values (CSV) format using Microsoft Excel software. The processed data were imported to RStudio software for data analysis.
The distribution of dengue cases was assessed using box-and-whisker plots for the analysis of the spread period in the three southernmost provinces of Thailand (i.e., Pattani, Yala, and Narathiwat). A box plot provides a visualization of a distribution. The box stretches from the lower hinge (defined as the 25th percentile) to the upper hinge (the 75th percentile). The median is shown as a line across the box [16]. Spearman’s rank correlation test was used to evaluate the correlations of the monthly weather variables and cases of dengue fever for time lags from zero to two months. The time lag was defined as the period between one weather observation and the incidence of dengue [17]. A basic multivariable Poisson regression model can be written as:
l n ( Y ) = β 0 + β 1 X T m e a n + β 2 X T m i n + β 3 X T m a x + β 4 X R a i n f a l l + β 5 X R a i n y d a y s + β 6 X R H + β 7 X A i r p r e s s u r e
The model adjusted for the first-order autocorrelation was:
l n ( Y ) = β 0 + β 1 ( Y t 1 ) + β 2 X T m e a n + β 3 X T m i n + β 4 X T m a x + β 5 X R a i n f a l l + β 6 X R a i n y d a y s + β 7 X R H + β 8 X A i r p r e s s u r e
Here, the variables XTmean, XTmin, XTmax, XRainfall, XRainydays, XRH, and XAirpressure stand for mean temperature, minimum temperature, maximum temperature, amount of rainfall, number of rainy days, relative humidity, and air pressure, respectively. All the weather variables were tested for multicollinearity with Variance Inflation Factors (VIF).
In assessing the selected model of the study area, data were divided into two sets: training and test sets. Data from January 2015 to December 2018 (training data) were used to create time series models. Seasonal adjustment with differencing was used for training data. Afterwards, the model was evaluated for prediction accuracy by using the data from January 2019 to December 2019 (test data). The residual deviance was used for a goodness of fit test, which shows how well the response is predicted by the model when the predictors are included. A low residual deviance implies that the trained model is appropriate. If the model is correct, the residual deviance should be approximately Chi-squared (χ2) with the stated degrees of freedom. All statistical analyses were performed using the RStudio version 1.2.5001 with a package of time series analysis (Northern Ave, Boston, MA, USA).
The inverse distance weighted (IDW) interpolation approach was used to estimate the weather data in all districts in the studied province. The IDW method is a spatial interpolation method, which uses spatial distance for the correlation calculation that is the distance weight calculation. IDW is used to estimate the properties at each unknown point [18]. The IDW technique computes an average value for unsampled locations using values from nearby measured locations, with weights. The weights are proportional to the proximity of the sampled points to the unsampled location and can be modified by the IDW power coefficient.
The number of dengue cases and the estimated weather data with IDW interpolation approach in each district were used for dengue prediction in the district using the province model. The predicted dengue cases in the district were identified using the classes of dengue incidence rate, namely, 0.00, 0.01–70.00, 70.01–140.00, 140.01–210.00, 210.01–280.00, 280.01–350.00, and >350.00 [19]. The class of dengue incidence rate in all districts among the three southernmost provinces were mapped from low to high dengue transmission risk areas shown by shading. The predicted dengue cases were grouped according to attribute values using equal intervals dividing the range of attribute values into equal-sized subranges. The annual incidence was then represented on a spatial map, created using the geographical information system ArcGIS version 10.8 (ESRI, Redlands, CA, USA).
The diagram illustrating the course of the research procedure is summarized in Figure 3.

3. Results

During the study period from 2015 to 2019, ranking all data points for monthly dengue cases by province showed the largest number of dengue cases from June to August in Pattani province (Figure 4a). In Yala province, the largest number of dengue cases occurred from June to September during 2015–2019 (Figure 4b). Furthermore, the largest number of dengue cases occurred from June to October in Narathiwat, in the same study period (Figure 4c). When comparing the distributions of dengue cases among the three southernmost provinces, it was found that Narathiwat had a longer disease delay than Pattani and Yala provinces. Additionally, there was the longest period of dengue transmission in Narathiwat province (i.e., from June to October) based on five years of data as the study period.
Spearman’s rank correlation test was used to analyze the association between dengue cases during the study period and weather predictors at zero to two months lag times. In Pattani, the monthly amount of rainfall, the number of rainy days, relative humidity, and mean temperature showed positive correlations with the dengue cases at a lag of 1 month (Table 1). A positive association was also shown for minimum and maximum temperatures at a lag of 2 months (Table 1). Monthly air pressure showed a negative correlation with dengue cases at a lag of two months in Pattani province (Table 1).
In Yala province, relative humidity in the current month was positively associated with the number of dengue cases (Table 1). A positive association was also observed for the monthly amount of rainfall, the number of rainy days and the mean/min/max temperatures at lags of one and two months, respectively (Table 1). The air pressure was negatively correlated with the number of dengue cases at a lag of two months in Yala (Table 1).
In Narathiwat province, the number of rainy days and the monthly amount of rainfall showed positive correlations with dengue cases in the current month and two months, respectively (Table 1). The mean/min/max temperatures at a lag of two months were positively associated with dengue cases in Narathiwat (Table 1), whereas negative correlations were observed between dengue cases and air pressure or relative humidity at a lag of two months (Table 1).

Poisson Regression Model and Spatial Mapping

The number of dengue cases, relative humidity and the amount of rainfall at a lag of one month, and maximum temperature at a lag of two months were positively associated with the number of dengue cases at the current month in Pattani province (Poisson regression model: The number of dengue cases with lag 1, relative humidity with lag 1, rainfall with lag 1, maximum temperature with lag 2, Table 2). The average air pressure at a lag of two months had negative effects on the number of dengue cases in Pattani (Poisson regression model: air pressure with lag 2, Table 2).
The Poisson regression model for Pattani province was
l n ( Y ) = 137.2 + 0.0072 X t 1 0.1364 X A i r p r e s s u r e + 0.0252 X R H + 0.0006 X R a i n f a l l + 0.0112 X T m a x
The maximum temperature and the number of rainy days at a lag of two months, and the number of dengue cases during the previous month were positively associated with the number of dengue cases in the current month in Yala province (Poisson regression model: The number of rainy days with lag 2, maximum temperature with lag 2, Table 3). The air pressure had a negative effect on the number of dengue cases in Yala (Poisson regression model: air pressure with lag 2, Table 3).
The Poisson regression model for Yala province was
  l n ( Y ) = 119.98 + 0.0324 X t 1 0.1199 X A i r p r e s s u r e + 0.0197 X R a i n y d a y s + 0.0872 X T m a x
The number of dengue cases in the current month was related to the number of dengue cases during the previous month for Narathiwat province (Poisson regression model: The number dengue cases with lag 1, Table 4). The amount of rainfall and minimum temperature at a lag of two months positively affected the number of dengue cases in Narathiwat (Poisson regression model: rainfall with lag 2, minimum temperature with lag 2, Table 4). The air pressure at a lag of two months had a negative effect on the number of dengue cases (Poisson regression model: air pressure with lag 2, Table 4).
The Poisson regression model for Narathiwat province was
  l n ( Y ) = 132.9 + 0.0092 X t 1 0.1323 X A i r p r e s s u r e + 0.0002 X R a i n f a l l + 0.1778 X T m i n
During the prediction for January–December 2019, the residual deviance of our model in Pattani province is 863.02, suggesting that air pressure, relative humidity, amount of rainfall, maximum temperature, and past dengue cases can be used to explain the monthly dengue counts (Pattani province: AIC: 1196.8, Residual Deviance: 863.02). In Yala province, air pressure, number of rainy days, maximum temperature, and number of dengue cases in the previous month were suitable parameters to explain the monthly number of dengue cases (Yala province: AIC: 398.57, residual deviance: 202.59). In Narathiwat province, air pressure, amount of rainfall, minimum temperature, and past dengue cases can be used to explain the monthly dengue occurrence (Narathiwat province: AIC: 711.77, residual deviance: 446.52). The goodness-of-fit analyses revealed that the model fits the data reasonably well with chi-squared test statistically significant (Pattani: residual deviance: 863.02, Chi-squared test: χ241 = 108.00, p > 0.001; Yala: residual deviance: 202.59, Chi-squared test: χ241 = 119.99, p > 0.001; Narathiwat: residual deviance: 446.52, Chi-squared test: χ241 = 110.99, p > 0.001).
The best fitted model in all provinces was the time-series Poisson regression model (Model I) with the lowest AIC and residual deviance and high correlation coefficient between actual and predicted dengue cases (Table 5).
The time-series Poisson regression models were developed by fitting the observed monthly dengue incidences over 48 months for the period from January 2015 to December 2018 and were validated with monthly numbers of dengue cases for the period from January 2019 to December 2019. The time series predictions for the validation period and the actual reported cases are shown in Figure 5 (Pattani, Figure 5a; Yala, Figure 5b; and Narathiwat, Figure 5c).
The predicted dengue cases in each district were obtained from the province model using the actual number of dengue cases and estimated weather data with IDW interpolation in the district. The spatial mapping of dengue fever cases in all districts among the three southernmost provinces of Thailand during the study period from 2015–2018 is shown in Figure 6 (2015, Figure 6a; 2016, Figure 6b; 2017, Figure 6c; 2018, Figure 6d). Additionally, the distribution of actual and predicted dengue fever cases for all districts in the year 2019 were mapped from low to high dengue transmission risk areas shown by shading (actual dengue fever cases, Figure 6e; predicted dengue fever cases, Figure 6f).

4. Discussion

This study is the first attempt to develop a predictive model for dengue cases based on weather and geospatial data in the three southernmost provinces of Thailand, and to provide a basis for assessing dengue trends. The results of this study on the Poisson regression model suggest that weather factors are associated with the dengue case counts. Our results support a previous study [8] in the claim that air pressure, relative humidity, rainfall, and temperature are associated with dengue incidence; that prior study was carried out in Nakhon Si Thammarat, Thailand.
The transient trends of dengue disease suggest that the weather variables play an important role in the dengue incidence in southern Thailand [11]. Our findings indicate that dengue transmission occurred from June to August during 2015–2019 in Pattani province, from June to September in Yala, and from June to October in Narathiwat. In addition, the longest dengue transmission duration in these three southernmost provinces of Thailand is from June to October over the study period from 2015–2019. These results agree with a previous study in southern Thailand [11] in that the longest dengue transmission duration in the Gulf of Thailand was from June to September; this is also consistent with previous findings in Singapore [20] that indicate a higher dengue incidence from June to October. This might be because the geography and climate in Thailand and Singapore are similar. Thailand and Singapore are both located in Southeast Asia, and are geographically south of China, east of the Indian subcontinent and north-west of Australia. Singapore’s climate is characterized by two monsoon seasons: northeast monsoon from December to early March and southwest monsoon from June to September [21]. The dengue incidence in Delhi, India is highest in April and from June to October [22]. This might be because the monsoon periods differ between Thailand and India. Additionally, the maximum temperature in India reaches up to 45 °C during the summer in April, May, and June [22].
Our results show that the highest dengue case counts occurred in June in Pattani and Yala provinces. Narathiwat province had the most dengue cases in August. These results are consistent with the previous findings that the most dengue cases occurred during June in the provinces near the Andaman Sea, including Phang-Nga, Phuket, Ranong, and Trang provinces [11].
This study found that the temperature contributes to dengue transmission in three southernmost provinces of Thailand. This result corresponds with the previous studies [23,24] that temperature is reported as a precipitating factor for dengue transmission. Temperature is the most important weather factor affecting the growth and dispersion of mosquito vector, and a potential predictor of dengue outbreak [11,25]. Temperature also plays a role in altering the entire mosquito’s incubation life cycle and behavior, including the density of the mosquito population [26], biting rates, gonotrophic cycle lengths, and vector size [27]. The results in this study confirm the previous studies [8,28,29] indicating that extreme temperature affects the development of dengue vectors [21,30,31]. Therefore, temperature affects vectorial efficiency [32] and risk of an epidemic [33]. Given the association between temperature and dengue cases, the projected change in temperature may exacerbate dengue transmission by the three southernmost provinces of Thailand.
Our results show that rainfall and the number of rainy days were positively associated with dengue transmission in the three southernmost provinces of Thailand. This finding is in general agreement with other studies [9,11,34], in which rainfall is reported as a precipitating factor for dengue transmission. Mosquitoes complete their life cycles in water, then hatch to be adult mosquitoes. Increased rain may increase larval habitat and vector population size by creating a new habitat or increase adult survival [29]. This study found that the number of rainy days was positively associated with the number of dengue cases in Yala province. The results match those of a previous study [11] in which the number of rainy days was positively associated with the number of dengue cases in Phatthalung province, but were negatively associated with the number of dengue cases in Nakhon Si Thammarat [11]. Our findings may be influenced by the topographical similarity of Yala and Phatthalung provinces as there is no seaside area in Yala or Phatthalung, and the previous studies also showed that Ae. albopictus are found more in seaside areas than in mountainous areas [34].
Additionally, this study found that the amount of rainfall was associated with the dengue cases in Pattani and Narathiwat. Our findings confirm that rainfall is a critical factor influencing dengue epidemics, as previously reported in Taiwan [35] and Jakarta [9]. Light rain can occur in some areas, which creates a habitat for the Ae. aegypti, while heavy rains can cause the larvae to be washed away, as reported in Malaysia [36].
Our results show that relative humidity was positively correlated over the current month and was negatively correlated for the previous two months. Similar results were also found in previous studies [14,29,37]. This might be because the relative humidity affects the rainfall, as it indicates the saturation of moisture in the air, and a downward change in temperature of saturated air will cause condensation and rain [38].
The Pattani and Narathiwat provinces are near the Gulf of Thailand and have many rivers, while the Yala province does not have any land adjacent to the sea or mountains [39]. In addition to the weather variables that affect the occurrence of dengue, the population density may affect dengue case counts [40] because population congestion supports the spread of an epidemic. The population growth rate in the southernmost provinces in 2019 (2626 populations) has increased slightly from 2017 and 2018 (2017: 1447 populations; 2018: 943 populations) [41].

5. Conclusions

This study presents spatial and temporal modelling of dengue fever transmission and mapping of dengue predictions using Geographic Information System (GIS) technology. The Poisson regression model using dengue case data and weather data included rainfall, number of rainy days, mean temperature, minimum temperature, maximum temperature, relative humidity, and air pressure as candidate predictors, in the three southernmost provinces of Thailand. The weather variables are the main predictors for dengue transmission with a high correlation between the actual monthly dengue cases and the predicted monthly dengue cases in the three southernmost provinces. The identification of trends in dengue cases can be used to support local public health policies and actions. Pre-planning of emergency mosquito control measures can help reduce the risk of a dengue outbreak [42,43].
This study had some limitations that should be mentioned to ensure that the study findings are fairly interpreted. Monthly data for five years were used in this study. Increasing sample size or spatial resolution could potentially improve the efficiency of the machine learning approach. Weekly data could be used for a more accurate model, using weather factors to predict dengue fever transmission. In addition, other factors such as land use, land cover, mosquito larvae data, and population density are interesting factors for updating or improving the dengue predictive model. Adding more environmental factors may improve the model and reduce the prediction errors. Automatic dengue prediction could be applied with other algorithms in machine learning. The results from this study may be useful scientific information, demonstrating use of weather data in the study areas in a predictive model, eventually intended for an early warning system on dengue transmission. The spatial mapping of dengue cases could enable effective area-based dengue prevention and control programs and enable more efficient planning for dealing with dengue fever. The predictive model can support decision making by public health organizations and for management of high-risk areas.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, T.S. and S.K.; Data curation, T.S.; Formal analysis, T.S. and S.K.; Investigation, T.S. and S.K.; Methodology, T.S., S.K., and S.P.; Visualization, T.S. and S.K.; Writing—original draft, T.S., S.K., and S.P.; Writing—review and editing, T.S., S.K., and S.P.; Supervision, S.K. and S.P.; Project administration, S.K.; Funding acquisition, S.K. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by Prince of Songkla University, Surat Thani Campus, Graduate School, Prince of Songkla University and Prince of Songkla University, Surat Thani Campus.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

No new data were created or analyzed in this study. Data sharing is not applicable to this article.

Acknowledgments

The authors thank John Endler and Seppo J. Karrila for constructive comments on this manuscript. We also thank the Bureau of Epidemiology, Ministry of Public Health for dengue case data and the Meteorological Department of Southern Thailand for weather data in this study.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. World Health Organization. Global Strategy for Dengue Prevention and Control 2012–2020; World Health Organization: Geneva, Switzerland, 2012. [Google Scholar]
  2. World Health Organization. Global Status Report on Alcohol and Health 2018; World Health Organization: Geneva, Switzerland, 2019. [Google Scholar]
  3. Jayaraj, V.J.; Avoi, R.; Gopalakrishnan, N.; Raja, D.B.; Umasa, Y. Developing a dengue prediction model based on climate in Tawau, Malaysia. Acta Trop. 2019, 197. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Halstead, S.B. Dengue haemorrhagic fever—A public health problem and a field for research. Bull. World Health Organ. 1980, 58, 1–21. [Google Scholar]
  5. Bureau of Epidemiology. Ministry of Public Health, Dengue Fever 2019 Report. 2019. Available online: https://ddc.moph.go.th/uploads/ckeditor/6f4922f45568161a8cdf4ad2299f6d23/file/Dangue/Prophecy/2562.pdf (accessed on 20 May 2020).
  6. Thai Meteorological Department. Weather Summary in 2019. 2019. Available online: https://www.tmd.go.th/climate/climate.php?FileID=5 (accessed on 20 May 2020).
  7. Climatological Center, Thai Meteorological Department. The Climate Change Affecting with Human Hygiene. 2020. Available online: http://www.climate.tmd.go.th/content/article/12?fbclid=IwAR2aBNrTszjG8kK2RxSEODhDjB1s1aD2QnyxdQ1IGco_mtgebLmhSggi6MI (accessed on 20 May 2020).
  8. Wongkoon, S.; Jaroensutasinee, M.; Jaroensutasinee, K. Weather factors influencing the occurrence of dengue fever in Nakhon Si Thammarat, Thailand. Trop. Biomed. 2013, 30, 631–641. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  9. Fakhruddin, M.; Putra, P.S.; Wijaya, K.P.; Sopaheluwakan, A.; Satyaningsih, R.; Komalasari, K.E.; Mamenun; Sumiati; Sapto, W.I.; Nuraini, N.; et al. Assessing the interplay between dengue incidence and weather in Jakarta via a clustering integrated multiple regression model. Ecol. Complex. 2019, 39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Thammapalo, S.; Chongsuvivatwong, V.; Geater, A.; Dueravee, M. Environmental factors and incidence of dengue fever and dengue haemorrhagic fever in an urban area, Southern Thailand. Epidemiol. Infect. 2008, 136, 135–143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Wongkoon, S.; Jaroensutasinee, M.; Jaroensutasinee, K. Spatio-temporal climate-based model of dengue infection in Southern, Thailand. Trop. Biomed. 2016, 33, 55–70. [Google Scholar]
  12. Cabrera, M.; Taylor, G. Modelling spatio-temporal data of dengue fever using generalized additive mixed models. Spat. Spatiotemporal Epidemiol. 2019, 28, 1–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Degallier, N.; Favier, C.; Menkes, C.; Lengaigne, M.; Ramalho, W.M.; Souza, R.; Servain, J.; Boulanger, J.P. Toward an early warning system for dengue prevention: Modeling climate impact on dengue transmission. Clim. Chang. 2010, 98, 581–592. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Thammapalo, S.; Chongsuwiwatwong, V.; McNeil, D.; Geater, A. The climatic factors influencing the occurrence of dengue hemorrhagic fever in Thailand. Southeast Asian J. Trop. Med. Public Health 2005, 36, 191–196. [Google Scholar]
  15. Puggioni, G.; Couret, J.; Serman, E.; Akanda, A.S.; Ginsberg, H.S. Spatiotemporal modeling of dengue fever risk in Puerto Rico. Spat. Spatiotemporal Epidemiol. 2020, 35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Davidmlane.com. HyperStat Online Statistics Textbook. 2020. Available online: https://davidmlane.com/hyperstat/index.html (accessed on 8 December 2020).
  17. Chatfield, C. The Analysis of Time Series: Theory and Practice; Springer: Boston, MA, USA, 2013. [Google Scholar]
  18. Liu, Z.-N.; Yu, X.-Y.; Jia, L.-F.; Wang, Y.-S.; Song, Y.-C.; Meng, H.-D. The influence of distance weight on the inverse distance weighted method for ore-grade estimation. Sci. Rep. 2021, 11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Pasaribu, A.P.; Tsheten, T.; Yamin, M.; Maryani, Y.; Fahmi, F.; Clements, A.C.; Gray, J.D.; Wangdi, K. Spatio-Temporal Patterns of Dengue Incidence in Medan City, North Sumatera, Indonesia. Trop. Med. Infect. Dis. 2021, 6, 30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Sahay, S. Climatic variability and dengue risk in urban environment of Delhi (India). Urban Clim. 2018, 24, 863–874. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Meteorological Service Singapore. Climate of Singapore. 2020. Available online: http://www.weather.gov.sg/climate-climate-of--singapore/ (accessed on 10 December 2020).
  22. Hii, Y.L.; Zhu, H.; Ng, N.; Ng, L.C.; Rocklov, J. Forecast of dengue incidence using temperature and rainfall. PLoS Negl. Trop. Dis. 2012, 6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  23. Wu, P.-C.; Guo, H.-R.; Lung, S.-C.; Lin, C.-Y.; Su, H.-J. Weather as an effective predictor for occurrence of dengue fever in Taiwan. Acta Trop. 2007, 103, 50–57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Wongkoon, S.; Jaroensutasinee, M.; Jaroensutasinee, K. Distribution, seasonal variation and dengue transmission prediction at Sisaket, Thailand. Indian J. Med. Res. 2013, 138, 347–353. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  25. Wu, P.-C.; Lay, J.-G.; Guo, H.-R.; Lin, C.-Y.; Lung, S.-C.; Su, H.-J. Higher temperature and urbanization affect the spatial patterns of dengue fever transmission in subtropical Taiwan. Sci. Total Environ. 2009, 407, 2224–2233. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Li, Y.; Dou, Q.; Lu, Y.; Xiang, H.; Yu, X.; Liu, S. Effects of ambient temperature and precipitation on the risk of dengue fever: A systematic review and updated meta-analysis. Environ. Res. 2020, 191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Rueda, L.M.; Patel, K.J.; Axtell, R.C.; Stinner, R.E. Temperature—Dependent development and survival rate of Culex quinquefasciatus and Aedes aegypti (Diptera: Culcidae). J. Med. Entomol. 1990, 27, 892–898. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Polwiang, S. The time series seasonal patterns of dengue fever and associated weather variables in Bangkok (2003–2017). BMC Infect. Dis. 2020, 20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  29. Ehelepola, N.D.B.; Ariyaratne, K.; Buddhadasa, W.M.N.P.; Ratnayake, S.; Wickramasinghe, M. A study of the correlation between dengue and weather in Kandy City, Sri Lanka (2003-2012) and lessons learned. Infect. Dis. Poverty 2015, 4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  30. Indhumathi, K.; Kumar, K.S. A review on prediction of seasonal diseases based on climate change using big data. Mater. Today Proc. 2021, 37, 2648–2652. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Wongkoon, S.; Jaroensutasinee, M.; Jaroensutasinee, K. Locations and religious factors affecting dengue vectors in Nakhon Si Thammarat, Thailand. Walailak J. Sci. Technol. 2005, 2, 47–58. [Google Scholar]
  32. Bangs, M.J.; Larasati, R.P.; Corwin, A.L.; Wuryadi, S. Climatic factors associated with epidemic dengue in Palembang, Indonesia: Implications of short-term meteorological events on virus transmission. Southeast Asian J. Trop. Med. Public Health 2006, 37, 1103–1116. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  33. Schoof, H.F. Mating resting habits and dispersal of Aedes aegypi. Bull. World Health Organ. 1967, 36, 600–601. [Google Scholar]
  34. Jacome, G.; Vilela, P.; Yoo, C. Social-ecological modelling of the spatial distribution of dengue fever and its temporal dynamics in Guayaquil, Ecuador for climate change adaption. Ecol. Inform. 2019, 49, 1–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Chen, T.-H.K.; Chen, V.Y.-J.; Wen, T.-H. Revisiting the role of rainfall variability and its interactive effects with the built environment in urban dengue outbreaks. Appl. Geogr. 2018, 101, 14–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Li, C.F.; Lim, T.W.; Han, L.L.; Fang, R. Rainfall, abundance of Aedes aegypti and dengue infection in Selangor, Malaysia. Southeast Asian J. Trop. Med. Public Health 1985, 16, 560–568. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  37. Silawan, T.; Singhasivanon, P.; Kaewkungwal, J.; Nimmanitya, S.; Suwonkerd, W. Temporal patterns and forecast of dengue infection in Northeastern Thailand. Southeast Asian J. Trop. Med. Public Health 2008, 39, 90–98. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  38. National Weather Service, NOAA. Discussion on Humidity. 2020. Available online: https://www.weather.gov/lmk/humidity (accessed on 15 December 2020).
  39. Kaewtathip, W.; Phetrat, P. The Study of Factors on Cultural and Natural Landscape of Southern Border Provinces at Suit to Agricultural Potential for Encouraging Requirement to Set Up Agricultural Faculty of Yala Rajabhat University. J. Yala Rajabhat. Univ. 2017, 12, 79–92. [Google Scholar]
  40. Gallo, M.S.; Ribeiro, M.C.; Prata-Shimomura, A.R.; Ferreira, A.T. Identifying Geographic Dengue Fever Distribution by Modeling Environmental Variables. Int. J. Geoinform. 2020, 16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Bureau of Epidemiology, Department of Disease Control, MoPH, Thailand. Dengue Haemorrhagic Fever. 2020. Available online: http://www.boe.moph.go.th/fact/Dengue_Haemorrhagic_Fever.htm (accessed on 20 December 2020).
  42. Parra, C.; Cernuzzi, L.; Rojas, R.; Denis, D.; Rivas, S.; Paciello, J.; Coloma, J.; Holston, J. Synergies Between Technology, Participation, and Citizen Science in a Community-Based Dengue Prevention Program. Am. Behav. Sci. 2020, 64, 1850–1870. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Gubler, D.J. Surveillance for dengue and dengue hemorrhagic fever. Bull. Pan Am. Health Organ. 1989, 23, 397–404. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
Figure 1. Study areas: (a) Study areas in Thailand’s three southernmost provinces: Pattani ( Sustainability 13 06754 i001), Yala ( Sustainability 13 06754 i002), and Narathiwat ( Sustainability 13 06754 i003), and (b) study area map with land cover data including rivers ( Sustainability 13 06754 i004), forests and mountains ( Sustainability 13 06754 i005), and ground ( Sustainability 13 06754 i006).
Figure 1. Study areas: (a) Study areas in Thailand’s three southernmost provinces: Pattani ( Sustainability 13 06754 i001), Yala ( Sustainability 13 06754 i002), and Narathiwat ( Sustainability 13 06754 i003), and (b) study area map with land cover data including rivers ( Sustainability 13 06754 i004), forests and mountains ( Sustainability 13 06754 i005), and ground ( Sustainability 13 06754 i006).
Sustainability 13 06754 g001
Figure 2. The weather data from 2015 to 2019 in the three southernmost provinces of Thailand: (a) Pattani, (b) Yala, and (c) Narathiwat. Weather data: the number of rainy days (black bar), amount of rainfall (blue line), min temperature (dashed black line), mean temperature (grey line), max temperature (black line), relative humidity (red line), and air pressure (green line).
Figure 2. The weather data from 2015 to 2019 in the three southernmost provinces of Thailand: (a) Pattani, (b) Yala, and (c) Narathiwat. Weather data: the number of rainy days (black bar), amount of rainfall (blue line), min temperature (dashed black line), mean temperature (grey line), max temperature (black line), relative humidity (red line), and air pressure (green line).
Sustainability 13 06754 g002aSustainability 13 06754 g002b
Figure 3. Illustration of research procedure.
Figure 3. Illustration of research procedure.
Sustainability 13 06754 g003
Figure 4. The spatial-temporal patterns of dengue case rates, from 2015 to 2019 in the three southernmost provinces of Thailand: (a) Pattani, (b) Yala, and (c) Narathiwat.
Figure 4. The spatial-temporal patterns of dengue case rates, from 2015 to 2019 in the three southernmost provinces of Thailand: (a) Pattani, (b) Yala, and (c) Narathiwat.
Sustainability 13 06754 g004aSustainability 13 06754 g004b
Figure 5. The actual monthly dengue cases (Black line) and the predicted monthly dengue cases (Red dash line) from January 2015 to December 2019. The time series Poisson regression models for three southernmost provinces of Thailand: (a) Pattani, (b) Yala, and (c) Narathiwat.
Figure 5. The actual monthly dengue cases (Black line) and the predicted monthly dengue cases (Red dash line) from January 2015 to December 2019. The time series Poisson regression models for three southernmost provinces of Thailand: (a) Pattani, (b) Yala, and (c) Narathiwat.
Sustainability 13 06754 g005
Figure 6. The spatial mapping of actual dengue cases from (ae) 2015–2019 and (f) predicted dengue cases in 2019 in the three southernmost provinces of Thailand.
Figure 6. The spatial mapping of actual dengue cases from (ae) 2015–2019 and (f) predicted dengue cases in 2019 in the three southernmost provinces of Thailand.
Sustainability 13 06754 g006
Table 1. Spearman’s rank correlations between weather variables and dengue cases in Pattani, Yala, and Narathiwat, at the lags that maximized these coefficients.
Table 1. Spearman’s rank correlations between weather variables and dengue cases in Pattani, Yala, and Narathiwat, at the lags that maximized these coefficients.
Weather VariablePattaniYalaNarathiwat
Spearman TestLagSpearman TestLagSpearman TestLag
Air pressure (hPa)−0.323 *2−0.263 *2−0.293 *2
Relative humidity (%)0.353 ***10.305 *0−0.375 **2
Rainfall (mm)0.333 *10.316 *10.143 *2
Rainy day (day)0.359 **10.257 *20.415 ***0
Mean temperature (°C)0.159 *10.271 *20.365 **2
Minimum temperature (°C)0.439 ***20.289 *20.546 ***2
Maximum temperature (°C)0.284 *20.253 *20.409 **2
Spearman Test: Spearman’s correlation coefficient; Lag: time lag (months). *, **, *** Significant at the 0.05, 0.01, and 0.001 level (two-tailed).
Table 2. Poisson regression coefficients of weather data with dengue cases from January 2015 to December 2018 in Pattani, Thailand.
Table 2. Poisson regression coefficients of weather data with dengue cases from January 2015 to December 2018 in Pattani, Thailand.
VariableβS.E.p-Value
Dengue case (lag 1)0.00720.0001<2.00 × 10−16
Air pressure (lag 2)−0.13640.02431.94 × 10−8
Relative humidity (lag 1)0.02520.00700.0003
Rainfall (lag 1)0.00060.00011.36 × 10−5
Maximum temperature (lag 2)0.01120.02889.50 × 10−5
AIC: Akaike’s information criterion, β: coefficients, S.E.: standard error. AIC: 1196.8, residual deviance: 863.02.
Table 3. Poisson regression coefficients of weather data with dengue cases from January 2015 to December 2018 in Yala, Thailand.
Table 3. Poisson regression coefficients of weather data with dengue cases from January 2015 to December 2018 in Yala, Thailand.
VariableβS.E.p-Value
Dengue case (lag 1)0.03240.0022<2.00 × 10−16
Air pressure (lag 2)−0.11990.04710.0109
Rainy day (lag 2)0.01970.00780.0115
Maximum temperature (lag 2)0.08720.02900.0026
AIC: Akaike’s information criterion, β: coefficients, S.E.: standard error. AIC: 398.57, residual deviance: 202.59.
Table 4. Poisson regression coefficients of weather data with dengue cases from January 2015 to December 2018 in Narathiwat, Thailand.
Table 4. Poisson regression coefficients of weather data with dengue cases from January 2015 to December 2018 in Narathiwat, Thailand.
VariableβS.E.p-Value
Dengue case (lag 1)0.00920.0003<2.00 × 10−16
Air pressure (lag 2)−0.13230.02091.81 × 10−10
Rainfall (lag 2)0.00020.00010.0482
Min temperature (lag 2)0.17780.02759.87 × 10−11
AIC: Akaike’s information criterion, β: coefficients, S.E.: standard error. AIC: 711.77, residual deviance: 446.52.
Table 5. Model evaluation testing in Pattani, Yala, and Narathiwat provinces.
Table 5. Model evaluation testing in Pattani, Yala, and Narathiwat provinces.
ModelAICResidual DeviancePearson Correlation
(Actual and Predicted)
Pattani province
Model I1196.80863.020.86
Model II3009.002683.700.80
Model III477.34-0.32
Yala province
Model I398.57202.590.83
Model II723.14529.160.79
Model III342.35-0.39
Narathiwat province
Model I711.77446.520.81
Model II1735.301472.10.86
Model III440.782-0.67
Model I: Weather variables without variable “Year”. Model II: Weather variables without variables “Year” and “dengue case at lag 1 month”. Model III: ARIMA model (univariate time series model).
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Sriklin, T.; Kajornkasirat, S.; Puttinaovarat, S. Dengue Transmission Mapping with Weather-Based Predictive Model in Three Southernmost Provinces of Thailand. Sustainability 2021, 13, 6754. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13126754

AMA Style

Sriklin T, Kajornkasirat S, Puttinaovarat S. Dengue Transmission Mapping with Weather-Based Predictive Model in Three Southernmost Provinces of Thailand. Sustainability. 2021; 13(12):6754. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13126754

Chicago/Turabian Style

Sriklin, Teerawad, Siriwan Kajornkasirat, and Supattra Puttinaovarat. 2021. "Dengue Transmission Mapping with Weather-Based Predictive Model in Three Southernmost Provinces of Thailand" Sustainability 13, no. 12: 6754. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13126754

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop