Application of Industry 4.0 in the Procurement Processes of Supply Chains: A Systematic Literature Review
Abstract
:1. Introduction
2. Systematic Literature Review
3. Review Discussion and Findings
3.1. Demographics
3.1.1. Year-Wise Publications
3.1.2. Contributions by Publishers
3.1.3. Distribution of Papers Structures
3.1.4. Contributions by Country
3.1.5. Distribution of the Most Attended Values Proposed in Procurement Using I4.0
3.1.6. Distribution of the Most Applied I4.0 Applications
3.2. Key I4.0 Applications Associated with Procurement
4. Conceptual Framework Regarding the Values Proposed in Procurement
4.1. Pricing
4.2. Supplier Performance Management
4.3. Reducing the Relevant Costs
4.4. Developing Sustainability
4.5. Risk Management
4.6. Data Security Improvement
4.7. Data-Sharing Management
4.8. Purchasing Performance Management
4.9. Cross-Functional Activity (Logistics)
5. Discussion
5.1. Theoretical Implications
5.2. Managerial Implications
5.3. Limitations
5.4. Implications for Future Studies
- How I4.0 and digital technologies affect the design of the supply network and what irrelevant processes can be omitted using smart technologies;
- How smart technologies can influence the labor force and what are the social and economic circumstances;
- How uncertainty and instability of the market can be tackled by the application of I4.0;
- The effect of I4.0 on different operations management issues such as vehicle routing problem, fleet assignment problem, and inventory management can be analyzed;
- Impact of different smart systems on procurement and SC that have not been studied in this paper;
- Determining how uncertainty and instability of the market can be tackled by the application of I4.0 [141].
6. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Tan, K.C. A framework of supply chain management literature. Eur. J. Purch. Supply Manag. 2001, 7, 39–48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hahn, G.J. Industry 4.0: A supply chain innovation perspective. Int. J. Prod. Res. 2020, 58, 1425–1441. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Glas, A.H.; Kleemann, F.C. The impact of industry 4.0 on procurement and supply management: A conceptual and qualitative analysis. Int. J. Bus. Manag. Invent. 2016, 5, 55–66. [Google Scholar]
- Tupa, J.; Simota, J.; Steiner, F. Aspects of risk management implementation for Industry 4.0. Procedia Manuf. 2017, 11, 1223–1230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Agarwal, S.; Sharma, V.; Pughat, A. Supplier selection problem in IoT solutions. Int. J. Pervasive Comput. Commun. 2019, 15, 1. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Huber, B.; Sweeney, E.; Smyth, A. Purchasing consortia and electronic markets-A procurement direction in integrated supply chain management. Electron. Mark. 2004, 14, 284–294. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Akaba, T.I. A Framework for the Adoption of a Blockchain-Based e-Procurement System: A Case Study of Nigeria. Master’s Thesis, Tallinn University of Technology, Tallinn, Estonia, 2019. [Google Scholar]
- Gottge, S.; Menzel, T.; Forslund, H. Industry 4.0 technologies in the purchasing process. Ind. Manag. Data Syst. 2020, 120, 4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Handfield, R.; Jeong, S.; Choi, T. Emerging procurement technology: Data analytics and cognitive analytics. Int. J. Phys. Distrib. Logist. Manag. 2019, 49, 972–1002. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, L.; Liu, M.; Meng, M.Q.-H. A pricing mechanism for task oriented resource allocation in cloud robotics. In Robots Sensor Clouds; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2016; pp. 3–31. [Google Scholar]
- Ghadimi, P.; Wang, C.; Lim, M.K.; Heavey, C. Intelligent sustainable supplier selection using multi-agent technology: Theory and application for Industry 4.0 supply chains. Comput. Ind. Eng. 2019, 127, 588–600. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Osmonbekov, T.; Johnston, W.J. Adoption of the Internet of Things technologies in business procurement: Impact on organizational buying behavior. J. Bus. Ind. Mark. 2018, 33, 781–791. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Min, H. Artificial intelligence in supply chain management: Theory and applications. Int. J. Logist. Res. Appl. 2010, 13, 13–39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Saberi, S.; Kouhizadeh, M.; Sarkis, J.; Shen, L. Blockchain technology and its relationships to sustainable supply chain management. Int. J. Prod. Res. 2019, 57, 2117–2135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Wanner, J.; Heinrich, K.; Janiesch, C.; Zschech, P. How Much AI Do You Require? Decision Factors for Adopting AI Technology. In Proceedings of the Forty-First International Conference on Information Systems, Online, 13–16 December 2020. [Google Scholar]
- Maity, G.; Roy, S.K.; Verdegay, J.L. Time variant multi-objective interval-valued transportation problem in sustainable development. Sustainability 2019, 11, 6161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Das, S.K.; Roy, S.K.; Weber, G.-W. Application of Type-2 Fuzzy Logic to a Multiobjective Green Solid Transportation–Location Problem With Dwell Time Under Carbon Tax, Cap, and Offset Policy: Fuzzy Versus Nonfuzzy Techniques. IEEE Trans. Fuzzy Syst. 2020, 28, 2711–2725. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Das, S.K.; Pervin, M.; Roy, S.K.; Weber, G.W. Multi-objective solid transportation-location problem with variable carbon emission in inventory management: A hybrid approach. Ann. Oper. Res. 2021, 1–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Midya, S.; Roy, S.K.; Vincent, F.Y. Intuitionistic fuzzy multi-stage multi-objective fixed-charge solid transportation problem in a green supply chain. Int. J. Mach. Learn. Cybern. 2021, 12, 699–717. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Das, S.K.; Roy, S.K. Effect of variable carbon emission in a multi-objective transportation-p-facility location problem under neutrosophic environment. Comput. Ind. Eng. 2019, 132, 311–324. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sepehri, A.; Mishra, U.; Sarkar, B. A sustainable production-inventory model with imperfect quality under preservation technology and quality improvement investment. J. Clean. Prod. 2021, 310, 127332. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tranfield, D.; Denyer, D.; Smart, P. Towards a methodology for developing evidence-informed management knowledge by means of systematic review. Br. J. Manag. 2003, 14, 207–222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Paul, J.; Lim, W.M.; O’Cass, A.; Hao, A.W.; Bresciani, S. Scientific procedures and rationales for systematic literature reviews (SPAR-4-SLR). Int. J. Consum. Stud. 2021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Paul, J.; Criado, A.R. The art of writing literature review: What do we know and what do we need to know? Int. Bus. Rev. 2020, 29, 101717. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mehdiabadi, A.; Tabatabeinasab, M.; Spulbar, C.; Karbassi Yazdi, A.; Birau, R. Are we ready for the challenge of banks 4.0? Designing a roadmap for banking systems in industry 4.0. Int. J. Financ. Stud. 2020, 8, 32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Toorajipour, R.; Sohrabpour, V.; Nazarpour, A.; Oghazi, P.; Fischl, M. Artificial intelligence in supply chain management: A systematic literature review. J. Bus. Res. 2021, 122, 502–517. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Xi, N.; Hamari, J. Shopping in virtual reality: A literature review and future agenda. J. Bus. Res. 2021, 134, 37–58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bienhaus, F.; Haddud, A. Procurement 4.0: Factors influencing the digitisation of procurement and supply chains. Bus. Process Manag. J. 2018, 24, 965–984. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Brandon-Jones, A.; Kauppi, K. Examining the antecedents of the technology acceptance model within e-procurement. Int. J. Oper. Prod. Manag. 2018, 38, 22–42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rejeb, A.; Sűle, E.; Keogh, J.G. Exploring new technologies in procurement. Transp. Logist. Int. J. 2018, 18, 1069–2406. [Google Scholar]
- Gubbi, J.; Buyya, R.; Marusic, S.; Palaniswami, M. Internet of Things (IoT): A vision, architectural elements, and future directions. Future Gener. Comput. Syst. 2013, 29, 1645–1660. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Bowman, P.; Ng, J.; Harrison, M.; Lopez, T.S.; Illic, A. Sensor based condition monitoring. In Building Radio Frequency IDentification for the Global Environ. (Bridge) Euro RFID Project; BRDGE: European Union, 2009. [Google Scholar]
- Wang, T.; Zhang, Y.; Zang, D. Real-time visibility traceability framework for discrete manufacturing shopfloor. In Proceedings of the 22nd International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Engineering Management 2015, Singapore, 6–9 December 2015; pp. 763–772. [Google Scholar]
- Rymaszewska, A.; Helo, P.; Gunasekaran, A. IoT powered servitization of manufacturing–an exploratory case study. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 2017, 192, 92–105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jedermann, R.; Lang, W. The benefits of embedded intelligence–tasks and applications for ubiquitous computing in logistics. In The Internet Things; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2008; pp. 105–122. [Google Scholar]
- Harris, I.; Wang, Y.; Wang, H. ICT in multimodal transport and technological trends: Unleashing potential for the future. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 2015, 159, 88–103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Kumar, V.; Amorim, M.; Bhattacharya, A.; Garza-Reyes, J.A.; Parry, G.C.; Brax, S.A.; Maull, R.S.; Ng, I.C. Operationalising IoT for reverse supply: The development of use-visibility measures. Supply Chain Manag. Int. J. 2016, 21, 2. [Google Scholar]
- Mell, P.; Grance, T. The NIST Definition of Cloud Computing; NIST: Gaithersburg, MD, USA, 2011. [Google Scholar]
- Tao, F.; Cheng, Y.; Zhang, L.; Nee, A.Y. Advanced manufacturing systems: Socialization characteristics and trends. J. Intell. Manuf. 2017, 28, 1079–1094. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Golightly, D.; Sharples, S.; Patel, H.; Ratchev, S. Manufacturing in the cloud: A human factors perspective. Int. J. Ind. Ergon. 2016, 55, 12–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Akbaripour, H.; Houshmand, M.; Fatahi Valilai, O. Cloud-based global supply chain: A conceptual model and multilayer architecture. J. Manuf. Science Eng. 2015, 137, 040913. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kong, X.T.; Fang, J.; Luo, H.; Huang, G.Q. Cloud-enabled real-time platform for adaptive planning and control in auction logistics center. Comput. Ind. Eng. 2015, 84, 79–90. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lee, H. Framework and development of fault detection classification using IoT device and cloud environment. J. Manuf. Syst. 2017, 43, 257–270. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kamble, S.S.; Gunasekaran, A.; Gawankar, S.A. Sustainable Industry 4.0 framework: A systematic literature review identifying the current trends and future perspectives. Process Saf. Environ. Prot. 2018, 117, 408–425. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gleeson, N.; Walden, I. Placing the state in the cloud: Issues of data governance and public procurement. Comput. Law Secur. Rev. 2016, 32, 683–695. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Acatech National Academy of Science and Engineering. Living in a Networked World. Integrated Research Agenda Cyber-Physical Systems (agendaCPS). 2015. Available online: http://www.cyphers.eu/sites/default/files/acatech_STUDIE_agendaCPS_eng_ANSICHT.pdf (accessed on 15 September 2020).
- DiMase, D.; Collier, Z.A.; Heffner, K.; Linkov, I. Systems engineering framework for cyber physical security and resilience. Environ. Syst. Decis. 2015, 35, 291–300. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Frazzon, E.M.; Silva, L.S.; Hurtado, P.A. Synchronizing and improving supply chains through the application of cyber-physical systems. IFAC-PapersOnLine 2015, 48, 2059–2064. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hans, C.; Hribernik, K.A.; Thoben, K.-D. An approach for the integration of data within complex logistics systems. In Dynamics in Logistics; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2008; pp. 381–390. [Google Scholar]
- Chen, L.-W.; Tseng, Y.-C.; Syue, K.-Z. Surveillance on-the-road: Vehicular tracking and reporting by V2V communications. Comput. Netw. 2014, 67, 154–163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Souza, G.C. Supply chain analytics. Bus. Horiz. 2014, 57, 595–605. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kabak, M.; Burmaoğlu, S. A holistic evaluation of the e-procurement website by using a hybrid MCDM methodology. Electron. Gov. Int. J. 2013, 10, 125–150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Khan, K. The transformative power of advanced analytics. Supply Chain Manag. Rev. 2013, 17, 48–49. [Google Scholar]
- Oruezabala, G.; Rico, J.-C. The impact of sustainable public procurement on supplier management—The case of French public hospitals. Ind. Mark. Manag. 2012, 41, 573–580. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Walker, H.; Brammer, S. The relationship between sustainable procurement and e-procurement in the public sector. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 2012, 140, 256–268. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Webster, C.; Ivanov, S. Robotics, artificial intelligence, and the evolving nature of work. In Digital Transformation in Business and Society; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2020; pp. 127–143. [Google Scholar]
- Wen, J.; He, L.; Zhu, F. Swarm robotics control and communications: Imminent challenges for next generation smart logistics. IEEE Commun. Mag. 2018, 56, 102–107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Merlino, M.; Sproģe, I. The augmented supply chain. Procedia Eng. 2017, 178, 308–318. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Crosby, M.; Pattanayak, P.; Verma, S.; Kalyanaraman, V. Blockchain technology: Beyond bitcoin. Appl. Innov. 2016, 2, 71. [Google Scholar]
- Tian, F. An agri-food supply chain traceability system for China based on RFID blockchain technology. In Proceedings of the 2016 13th International Conference on Service Systems and Service Management (ICSSSM), Kunming, China, 24–26 June 2016; pp. 1–6. [Google Scholar]
- Tian, F. A Supply Chain Traceability System for Food Safety Based on HACCP, Blockchain Internet Things. In Proceedings of the 2017 International Conference on Service Systems and Service Management, Dalian, China, 26–30 November 2017; pp. 1–6. [Google Scholar]
- Abeyratne, S.A.; Monfared, R.P. Blockchain ready manufacturing supply chain using distributed ledger. Int. J. Res. Eng. Technol. 2016, 5, 1–10. [Google Scholar]
- De Sousa Jabbour, A.B.L.; Chiappetta Jabbour, C.J.; Sarkis, J.; Gunasekaran, A.; Furlan Matos Alves, M.W.; Ribeiro, D.A. Decarbonisation of operations management–looking back, moving forward: A review and implications for the production research community. Int. J. Prod. Res. 2019, 57, 4743–4765. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Oh, J.; Jeong, B. Tactical supply planning in smart manufacturing supply chain. Robotics Comput.-Integr. Manuf. 2019, 55, 217–233. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lee, I.; Lee, K. The Internet of Things (IoT): Applications, investments, and challenges for enterprises. Bus. Horiz. 2015, 58, 431–440. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhong, H.; Nof, S.Y. The dynamic lines of collaboration model: Collaborative disruption response in cyber–physical systems. Comput. Ind. Eng. 2015, 87, 370–382. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Esmaeilikia, M.; Fahimnia, B.; Sarkis, J.; Govindan, K.; Kumar, A.; Mo, J. Tactical supply chain planning models with inherent flexibility: Definition and review. Ann. Oper. Res. 2016, 244, 407–427. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Korb, K.B.; Nicholson, A.E. Bayesian Artificial Intelligence; CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 2010. [Google Scholar]
- Pomerleau, D.A. Neural Network Perception for Mobile Robot Guidance; Springer Science & Business Media: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2012; Volume 239. [Google Scholar]
- Gaafar, L.K.; Choueiki, M.H. A neural network model for solving the lot-sizing problem. Omega 2000, 28, 175–184. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nissen, M.E.; Sengupta, K. Incorporating software agents into supply chains: Experimental investigation with a procurement task. Mis Q. 2006, 30, 145–166. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ciulla, G.; D’Amico, A.; Brano, V.L.; Traverso, M. Application of optimized artificial intelligence algorithm to evaluate the heating energy demand of non-residential buildings at European level. Energy 2019, 176, 380–391. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Angerhofer, B.J.; Angelides, M.C. System Dynamics Modelling in Supply Chain Management: Research Review. In Proceedings of the 2000 Winter Simulation Conference Proceedings (Cat. No. 00CH37165), Orlando, FL, USA, 10–13 December 2000; pp. 342–351. [Google Scholar]
- Tukuta, M.; Saruchera, F. Challenges facing procurement professionals in developing economies: Unlocking value through professional international purchasing. J. Transp. Supply Chain Manag. 2015, 9, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Chou, J.-S.; Lin, C.-W.; Pham, A.-D.; Shao, J.-Y. Optimized artificial intelligence models for predicting project award price. Autom. Constr. 2015, 54, 106–115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jie, Y.; Subramanian, N.; Ning, K.; Edwards, D. Product delivery service provider selection and customer satisfaction in the era of internet of things: A Chinese e-retailers’ perspective. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 2015, 159, 104–116. [Google Scholar]
- AlKhalifah, A.; Ansari, G.A. Modeling E-Procurement System through UML Using Data Mining Technique for Supplier Performance. In Proceedings of the 2016 International Conference on Software Networking (ICSN), Jeju, Korea, 23–26 May 2016; pp. 1–6. [Google Scholar]
- Bag, S. Fuzzy VIKOR approach for selection of big data analyst in procurement management. J. Transp. Supply Chain Manag. 2016, 10, 1–6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ellram, L.M.; Tate, W.L. The use of secondary data in purchasing and supply management (P/SM) research. J. Purch. Supply Manag. 2016, 22, 250–254. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fazekas, M.; Tóth, I.J.; King, L.P. An objective corruption risk index using public procurement data. Eur. J. Crim. Policy Res. 2016, 22, 369–397. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhao-yang, B.; Ling-li, S.; Lin-jie, S. Vendor selection and order allocation in the locomotive manufacturing industry using cloud technology. Int. J. Simul. Syst. Sci. Technol. 2016, 17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mladineo, M.; Veza, I.; Gjeldum, N. Solving partner selection problem in cyber-physical production networks using the HUMANT algorithm. Int. J. Prod. Res. 2017, 55, 2506–2521. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Moretto, A.; Ronchi, S.; Patrucco, A.S. Increasing the effectiveness of procurement decisions: The value of big data in the procurement process. Int. J. RF Technol. 2017, 8, 79–103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Trappey, A.J.; Trappey, C.V.; Fan, C.-Y.; Hsu, A.P.; Li, X.-K.; Lee, I.J. IoT patent roadmap for smart logistic service provision in the context of Industry 4.0. J. Chin. Inst. Eng. 2017, 40, 593–602. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- You, L.; Yao, D.-Q.; Sikora, R.T.; Nag, B. An Adaptive Supplier Selection Mechanism in E-Procurement Marketplace. J. Int. Technol. Inf. Manag. 2017, 26, 94–116. [Google Scholar]
- Abolbashari, M.H.; Chang, E.; Hussain, O.K.; Saberi, M. Smart buyer: A Bayesian network modelling approach for measuring and improving procurement performance in organisations. Knowl. Based Syst. 2018, 142, 127–148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Choi, Y.; Lee, H.; Irani, Z. Big data-driven fuzzy cognitive map for prioritising IT service procurement in the public sector. Ann. Oper. Res. 2018, 270, 75–104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Chopra, A. Technology in Procurement Supply as Prevalent Today Scope for Future. In Proceedings of the 2018 International Conference on Automation and Computational Engineering (ICACE), Dalian, China, 3–5 October 2018; pp. 216–223. [Google Scholar]
- Enayet, A.; Razzaque, M.A.; Hassan, M.M.; Alamri, A.; Fortino, G. A mobility-aware optimal resource allocation architecture for big data task execution on mobile cloud in smart cities. IEEE Commun. Mag. 2018, 56, 110–117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jeong, S.; Na, W.; Kim, J.; Cho, S. Internet of Things for smart manufacturing system: Trust issues in resource allocation. IEEE Int. Things J. 2018, 5, 4418–4427. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kaur, H.; Singh, S.P. Heuristic modeling for sustainable procurement and logistics in a supply chain using big data. Comput. Oper. Res. 2018, 98, 301–321. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, S.; Ni, Q.; Sun, Y.; Min, G.; Al-Rubaye, S. Energy-efficient resource allocation for industrial cyber-physical IoT systems in 5G era. IEEE Trans. Ind. Inform. 2018, 14, 2618–2628. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Lin, S.; Laili, Y.; Luo, Y. Integrated Optimization Supplier SELECTION service Scheduling in Cloud Manufacturing Environment. In Proceedings of the 2018 4th International Conference on Universal Village (UV), Boston, MA, USA, 23–24 October 2018; pp. 1–6. [Google Scholar]
- Macrinici, D.; Cartofeanu, C.; Gao, S. Smart contract applications within blockchain technology: A systematic mapping study. Telemat. Inform. 2018, 35, 2337–2354. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nicoletti, B. The future: Procurement 4.0. In Agile Procurement; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2018; pp. 189–230. [Google Scholar]
- Pinochet, L.H.C.; Lopes, E.L.; Srulzon, C.H.F.; Onusic, L.M. The influence of the attributes of “Internet of Things” products on functional and emotional experiences of purchase intention. Innov. Manag. Rev. 2018, 15, 3. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Singh, A.; Kumari, S.; Malekpoor, H.; Mishra, N. Big data cloud computing framework for low carbon supplier selection in the beef supply chain. J. Clean. Prod. 2018, 202, 139–149. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Song, Q.; Zheng, Y.-J.; Huang, Y.-J.; Xu, Z.-G.; Sheng, W.-G.; Yang, J. Emergency drug procurement planning based on big-data driven morbidity prediction. IEEE Trans. Ind. Inf. 2018, 15, 6379–6388. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sun, W.; Liu, J.; Yue, Y.; Zhang, H. Double auction-based resource allocation for mobile edge computing in industrial internet of things. IEEE Trans. Ind. Inform. 2018, 14, 4692–4701. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tönnissen, S.; Teuteberg, F. Using Blockchain Technology for Business Processes in Purchasing—Concept case Study-Based Evidence. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Business Information Systems, Colorado Springs, CO, USA, 8–10 June 2018; pp. 253–264. [Google Scholar]
- Uygun, Y.; Ilie, M. Autonomous manufacturing-related procurement in the era of industry 4.0. In Digitalisierung Im Einkauf; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2018; pp. 81–97. [Google Scholar]
- Wang, H.; Song, Y.; Tu, S.; Li, Y. The Selection Logist. Suppliers under Cloud Manuf. In Proceedings of the 2018 2nd International Conference on Artificial Intelligence: Technologies and Applications (ICAITA 2018), Chengdu, China, 25–26 March 2018; pp. 183–185. [Google Scholar]
- Wang, L.; Guo, S.; Li, X.; Du, B.; Xu, W. Distributed manufacturing resource selection strategy in cloud manufacturing. Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 2018, 94, 3375–3388. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yin, L.; Luo, J.; Luo, H. Tasks scheduling and resource allocation in fog computing based on containers for smart manufacturing. IEEE Trans. Ind. Inform. 2018, 14, 4712–4721. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhou, Y.; Yu, F.R.; Chen, J.; Kuo, Y. Robust energy-efficient resource allocation for IoT-powered cyber-physical-social smart systems with virtualization. IEEE Internet Things J. 2018, 6, 2413–2426. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Afrin, M.; Jin, J.; Rahman, A.; Tian, Y.-C.; Kulkarni, A. Multi-objective resource allocation for Edge Cloud based robotic workflow in smart factory. Future Gener. Comput. Syst. 2019, 97, 119–130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Berru, Y.T.; Batista, V.F.L.; Torres-Carrión, P.; Jimenez, M.G. Artificial Intelligence Techniques to Detect Prevent Corruption in Procurement: A Systematic Literature Rev. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Applied Technologies, Latacunga Canton, Ecuador, 4–6 December 2019; pp. 254–268. [Google Scholar]
- Çalı, S.; Balaman, Ş.Y. Improved decisions for marketing, supply and purchasing: Mining big data through an integration of sentiment analysis and intuitionistic fuzzy multi criteria assessment. Comput. Ind. Eng. 2019, 129, 315–332. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cavalcante, I.M.; Frazzon, E.M.; Forcellini, F.A.; Ivanov, D. A supervised machine learning approach to data-driven simulation of resilient supplier selection in digital manufacturing. Int. J. Inf. Manag. 2019, 49, 86–97. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chang, S.E.; Chen, Y.-C.; Lu, M.-F. Supply chain re-engineering using blockchain technology: A case of smart contract based tracking process. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Chang. 2019, 144, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gavrilova, J.A.; Kvitsinia, N.V.; Kalashnikova, N.A. Development the Institute Public Procurement in Modern Russia: Between Blockchain Administration. In Proceedings of the Competitive Russia: Foresight Model of Economic and Legal Development in the Digital Age, Volgograd, Russia, 19–20 September 2019; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2019; pp. 388–394. [Google Scholar]
- Jordon, K.; Dossou, P.-E.; Junior, J.C. Using lean manufacturing and machine learning for improving medicines procurement and dispatching in a hospital. Procedia Manuf. 2019, 38, 1034–1041. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lamba, K.; Singh, S.P. Dynamic supplier selection and lot-sizing problem considering carbon emissions in a big data environment. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Chang. 2019, 144, 573–584. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Layaq, M.W.; Goudz, A.; Noche, B.; Atif, M. The impact of digitization on tactical procurement and its risks management. Int. Acad. J. Procure. Supply Chain Manag. 2019, 3, 217–234. [Google Scholar]
- Li, Y.; Yang, W.; He, P.; Chen, C.; Wang, X. Design and management of a distributed hybrid energy system through smart contract and blockchain. Appl. Energy 2019, 248, 390–405. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Muñoz-Garcia, C.; Vila, J. Value creation in the international public procurement market: In search of springbok firms. J. Bus. Res. 2019, 101, 516–521. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rane, S.B.; Thakker, S.V. Green procurement process model based on blockchain–IoT integrated architecture for a sustainable business. Manag. Environ. Qual. Int. J. 2019, 31, 3. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sachdeva, N.; Shrivastava, A.K.; Chauhan, A. Modeling supplier selection in the era of Industry 4.0. Benchmarking An Int. J. 2019, 28, 5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Srai, J.S.; Lorentz, H. Developing design principles for the digitalisation of purchasing and supply management. J. Purch. Supply Manag. 2019, 25, 78–98. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Akaba, T.I.; Norta, A.; Udokwu, C.; Draheim, D. A Framework for the Adoption Blockchain-Based e-Procurement Systems in the Public Sector. In Proceedings of the Conference on e-Business, e-Services and e-Society, Skukuza, South Africa, 6–8 April 2020; pp. 3–14. [Google Scholar]
- Bag, S.; Wood, L.C.; Mangla, S.K.; Luthra, S. Procurement 4.0 and its implications on business process performance in a circular economy. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 2020, 152, 104502. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chen, Z.; Ming, X.; Zhou, T.; Chang, Y. Sustainable supplier selection for smart supply chain considering internal and external uncertainty: An integrated rough-fuzzy approach. Appl. Soft Comput. 2020, 87, 106004. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gholizadeh, H.; Fazlollahtabar, H.; Khalilzadeh, M. A robust fuzzy stochastic programming for sustainable procurement and logistics under hybrid uncertainty using big data. J. Clean. Prod. 2020, 258, 120640. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ghosh, D.; Sant, T.G.; Kuiti, M.R.; Swami, S.; Shankar, R. Strategic decisions, competition and cost-sharing contract under industry 4.0 and environmental considerations. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 2020, 162, 105057. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gupta, R.; Tanwar, S.; Al-Turjman, F.; Italiya, P.; Nauman, A.; Kim, S.W. Smart contract privacy protection using ai in cyber-physical systems: Tools, techniques and challenges. IEEE Access 2020, 8, 24746–24772. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Legenvre, H.; Henke, M.; Ruile, H. Making sense of the impact of the internet of things on Purchasing and Supply Management: A tension perspective. J. Purch. Supply Manag. 2020, 26, 100596. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nandankar, S.; Sachan, A. Electronic procurement adoption, usage and performance: A literature review. J. Sci. Technol. Policy Manag. 2020, 11, 4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nicoletti, B. Procurement 4.0 and the Fourth Industrial Revolution; Springer Nature: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2020. [Google Scholar]
- Pu, Z.; Jiang, Q.; Yue, H.; Tsaptsinos, M. Agent-based supply chain allocation model and its application in smart manufacturing enterprises. J. Supercomput. 2020, 76, 3188–3198. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Schulze-Horn, I.; Hueren, S.; Scheffler, P.; Schiele, H. Artificial Intelligence in Purchasing: Facilitating Mechanism Design-based Negotiations. Appl. Artif. Intell. 2020, 34, 618–642. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, G.; Chen, C.-H.; Zheng, P.; Zhong, R.Y. An integrated framework for active discovery and optimal allocation of smart manufacturing services. J. Clean. Prod. 2020, 273, 123144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kaur, H.; Singh, S.P. Multi-stage hybrid model for supplier selection and order allocation considering disruption risks and disruptive technologies. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 2021, 231, 107830. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ghosh, P.K.; Manna, A.K.; Dey, J.K.; Kar, S. Supply chain coordination model for green product with different payment strategies: A game theoretic approach. J. Clean. Prod. 2021, 290, 125734. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ramirez-Peña, M.; Sotano, A.J.S.; Pérez-Fernandez, V.; Abad, F.J.; Batista, M. Achieving a sustainable shipbuilding supply chain under I4. 0 perspective. J. Clean. Prod. 2020, 244, 118789. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- de Arroyabe, J.F.; Arranz, N.; Schumann, M.; Arroyabe, M.F. The development of CE business models in firms: The role of circular economy capabilities. Technovation 2021, 106, 102292. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Geng, Y.; Sarkis, J.; Bleischwitz, R. How to Globalize the Circular Economy; Nature Publishing Group: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2019. [Google Scholar]
- Nagy, J.; Oláh, J.; Erdei, E.; Máté, D.; Popp, J. The role and impact of Industry 4.0 and the internet of things on the business strategy of the value chain—The case of Hungary. Sustainability 2018, 10, 3491. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Kersten, W.; Blecker, T.; Ringle, C.M. Digitalization in Supply Chain Management and Logistics: Smart and Digital Solutions for an Industry 4.0 Environment; Epubli GmbH: Berlin, Germany, 2017. [Google Scholar]
- Porter, M.E.; Porter, M.E. The Competitive Advantage of Nations: With a New Introduction; Harvard Business Publishing: Brighton, MA, USA, 1998. [Google Scholar]
- Núñez-Merino, M.; Maqueira-Marín, J.M.; Moyano-Fuentes, J.; Martínez-Jurado, P.J. Information and digital technologies of Industry 4.0 and Lean supply chain management: A systematic literature review. Int. J. Prod. Res. 2020, 58, 5034–5061. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ivanov, D.; Dolgui, A.; Sokolov, B. The impact of digital technology and Industry 4.0 on the ripple effect and supply chain risk analytics. Int. J. Prod. Res. 2019, 57, 829–846. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Babiceanu, R.F.; Seker, R. Big Data and virtualization for manufacturing cyber-physical systems: A survey of the current status and future outlook. Comput. Ind. 2016, 81, 128–137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fatorachian, H.; Kazemi, H. Impact of Industry 4.0 on supply chain performance. Prod. Plan. Control 2021, 32, 63–81. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jerome, J.J.J.; Saxena, D.; Sonwaney, V.; Foropon, C. Procurement 4.0 to the rescue: Catalysing its adoption by modelling the challenges. Benchmarking Int. J. 2021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bag, S.; Dhamija, P.; Gupta, S.; Sivarajah, U. Examining the role of procurement 4.0 towards remanufacturing operations and circular economy. Prod. Plan. Control 2020, 1–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Golpîra, H.; Khan, S.A.R.; Safaeipour, S. A review of logistics internet-of-things: Current trends and scope for future research. J. Ind. Inf. Integr. 2021, 22, 100194. [Google Scholar]
- Tirkolaee, E.B.; Sadeghi, S.; Mooseloo, F.M.; Vandchali, H.R.; Aeini, S. Application of Machine Learning in Supply Chain Management: A Comprehensive Overview of the Main Areas. Math. Prob. Eng. 2021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Attari, M.Y.N.; Torkayesh, A.E. Developing benders decomposition algorithm for a green supply chain network of mine industry: Case of Iranian mine industry. Oper. Res. Perspect. 2018, 5, 371–382. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yazdani, M.; Torkayesh, A.E.; Stević, Ž.; Chatterjee, P.; Ahari, S.A.; Hernandez, V.D. An Interval Valued Neutrosophic Decision-Making Structure for Sustainable Supplier Selection. Expert. Syst. Appl. 2021, 183, 115354. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Vandchali, H.R.; Cahoon, S.; Chen, S.L. The impact of supply chain network structure on relationship management strategies: An empirical investigation of sustainability practices in retailers. Sustain. Prod. Consum. 2021, 28, 281–299. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Khakbaz, A.; Tirkolaee, E.B. A sustainable hybrid manufacturing/remanufacturing system with two-way substitution and WEEE directive under different market conditions. Optimization 2021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
I4.0 Technology | Definition | Application in SC | Source |
---|---|---|---|
Internet of Things | Interconnection of sensing and actuating devices providing the ability to share the information across platforms through a unified framework, developing a common operating picture for enabling innovative applications [31] |
| [32,33,34,35,36,37] |
Cloud Computing | A model for enabling ubiquitous, convenient, on-demand, network access to a shared pool of configurable computing resources that can be rapidly provisioned and released with minimal management effort or service provider interaction [38] |
| [39,40,41,42,43,44,45] |
Cyber-Physical Systems | A system that uses sensors and actuators to gather physical data and affect physical processes using multi-modal human-machine interaction [46] |
| [3,44,47,48,49] |
Big Data Analysis | High volume, high-velocity, and high-variety sets of dynamic data exceed the processing capabilities of traditional data management approaches [50] |
| [51,52,53,54,55] |
Robotics | A technology that allows companies to decrease the human interventions and facilitate the operations [56] |
| [57,58] |
Blockchain | A distributed database of records or shared public/private ledgers of all digital events that have been executed and shared among blockchain participating agents [59] |
| [60,61,62,63] |
Smart manufacturing | Contribution of information, communication, and production technology in SC domain to maintain the balance of demand and supply, and to maximize customer satisfaction with minimum cost [64] |
| [3,65,66,67] |
Artificial Intelligence | A field of computer science and engineering concerned with the computational understanding of what is commonly called intelligent behavior, and with the creation of artifacts that exhibit such behavior [68] |
| [69,70,71,72] |
Simulation | A method to draw a system with uncertainties of its all elements to improve its performance according to its requirements |
| [73] |
Reference | I4.0 Aspect | Values Proposed in Procurement | Methodology | Structure |
---|---|---|---|---|
Chou et al. [75] | Artificial intelligence | Pricing | Genetic algorithm | Cased-base |
Jie et al. [76] | Internet of Things | Supplier selection and evaluation | Structural equation modeling (SEM) | Conceptual |
AlKhalifah and Ansari [77] | Data Mining | Supplier selection and evaluation | Linear regression model | Cased-base |
Bag [78] | Big Data analysis | Purchasing performance management | Fuzzy (VIKOR) method | Mathematical model |
Ellram and Tate [79] | Big Data analysis | Purchasing performance management | Literature review | Cased-base |
Fazekas et al. [80] | Big Data analysis | Risk management | Crawler algorithm | Cased-base |
Glas and Kleemann [3] | Internet of Things | Purchasing performance management | Literature review | Conceptual |
Gleeson and Walden [45] | Cloud computing | Data security improvement | Robust data classification | Cased-base |
Wang et al. [10] | Cloud Robotics | Supplier selection and evaluation | Stackelberg game model | Mathematical model |
Zhao-yang et al. [81] | Cloud manufacturing | Pricing | Genetic algorithm | Mathematical model |
Mladineo et al. [82] | Cyber-Physical Systems | Supplier performance management | HUMANT algorithm | Mathematical model |
Moretto et al. [83] | Big Data analysis | Reducing the relevant costs | Case-based issues | Survey |
Trappey et al. [84] | Internet of Things | Supplier performance management | Literature review | Survey |
You et al. [85] | Simulation | Supplier performance management | Transaction analysis | Mathematical model |
Abolbashari et al. [86] | Smart technology | Purchasing performance management | Bayesian Network Modeling (BNM) | Mathematical model |
Bienhaus and Haddud [28] | Procurement 4.0 | Purchasing performance management | Challenge recognition using interview | Conceptual |
Choi et al. [87] | Big Data Analysis | Purchasing performance enhancement | Fuzzy Cognitive Map (FCM) | Mathematical model |
Chopra [88] | Smart manufacturing | Reducing the relevant costs | Literature review | Survey |
Enayet et al. [89] | Big Data Analysis | Purchasing performance enhancement | Transaction analysis | Mathematical model |
Jeong et al. [90] | Internet of Things | Purchasing performance enhancement | Auction-based algorithm | Mathematical model |
Kaur and Singh [91] | Big Data | Developing sustainability | Heuristic algorithm | Mathematical model |
Li et al. [92] | Cyber-Physical Internet of Things | Purchasing performance enhancement | Dinkelbach’s algorithm | Mathematical model |
Lin et al. [93] | Cloud manufacturing | Supplier selection and evaluation | decomposition-based-multi-objective evolutionary algorithm | Cased-base |
Macrinici et al. [94] | Blockchain | Purchasing performance management | Systematic mapping approach | Cased-base |
Nicoletti [95] | Simulation | Purchasing performance management | Literature review | Conceptual |
Osmonbekov and Johnston [12] | Internet of Things | Purchasing performance management | buying behavior theory | Conceptual |
Pinochet et al. [96] | Internet of things | Purchasing performance management | Interview | Cased-base |
Rejeb et al. [30] | Smart technologies | Purchasing performance management | Literature review | Survey |
Singh et al. [97] | Cloud manufacturing | Developing sustainability | Fuzzy AHP, DEMATEL, and TOPSIS | Case-based |
Song et al. [98] | Big Data analysis | Supplier performance management | Deep learning model | Mathematical model |
Sun et al. [99] | Big Data analysis | Pricing | Dynamic pricing iterative algorithm | Mathematical model |
Tönnissen and Teuteberg [100] | Blockchain | Supplier performance management | Interview | Case-based |
Uygun and Ilie [101] | Smart manufacturing | Supplier performance management | Procurement processes management | Conceptual |
Wang et al. [102] | Cloud manufacturing | Supplier performance management | TOPSIS model for supplier evaluation | Mathematical model |
Wang et al. [103] | Cloud manufacturing | Supplier performance management | Distributed Genetic algorithm | Mathematical model |
Yin et al. [104] | Smart manufacturing | Purchasing performance management | Fog computing | Mathematical model |
Zhou et al. [105] | Internet of Things | Purchasing performance management | Channel State Information (CSI) model | Mathematical model |
Afrin et al. [106] | Robotics | Purchasing performance management | Non-dominated Sorting Genetic algorithm | Case-based |
Agarwal et al. [5] | Internet of Things | Supplier selection and evaluation | Multi-objective optimization | Case-based |
Akaba [7] | Blockchain | Data security improvement | Interview | Case-based |
Berru et al. [107] | Internet of Things | Risk management | Literature review | Survey |
Çalı and Balaman [108] | Big Data analysis | Supplier selection and evaluation | Multi-Criteria Decision-making | Case-based |
Cavalcante et al. [109] | Artificial intelligence | Supplier selection and evaluation | SC mapping | Conceptual |
Chang et al. [110] | Blockchain | Data-sharing improvement | Literature review | Conceptual |
Gavrilova et al. [111] | Blockchain | Risk management | Classification framework | Conceptual |
Ghadimi et al. [11] | Cyber-Physical Systems | Supplier selection and evaluation | Fuzzy-set theory | Case-based |
Handfield et al. [9] | Big Data analysis | Purchasing performance enhancement | Interview | Case-based |
Jordon et al. [112] | Artificial intelligence | Purchasing performance enhancement | DMAIC in total quality management | Conceptual |
Lamba and Singh [113] | Big Data analysis | Developing sustainability | Mixed-integer non-linear programming | Mathematical model |
Layaq et al. [114] | Smart technology | Risk management | Interview | Conceptual |
Li et al. [115] | Blockchain | Risk management | Game theory for smart contracts | Mathematical model |
Muñoz-Garcia and Vila [116] | Public procurement 4.0 | Pricing | Data gathering and analyzing | Conceptual |
Oh and Jeong [64] | Smart manufacturing | Reducing the relevant costs | SC network design | Mathematical model |
Rane and Thakker [117] | Blockchain | Developing sustainability | Literature review | Survey |
Sachdeva et al. [118] | Smart technology | Supplier performance management | Fuzzy entropy weight-based TOPSIS | Mathematical model |
Srai and Lorentz [119] | Smart technology | Purchasing performance enhancement | Literature review | Survey |
Akaba et al. [120] | Blockchain | Purchasing performance enhancement | Interview | Case-based |
Bag et al. [121] | Simulation | Developing sustainability | Partial Least Squares Structural Equation | Case-based |
Chen et al. [122] | Simulation | Supplier selection and evaluation | Hybrid rough-fuzzy DEMATEL | Case-based |
Gholizadeh et al. [123] | Big Data analysis | Reducing the relevant costs | Heuristic method (MCDM) | Mathematical model |
Ghosh et al. [124] | cyber-physical systems | pricing | SC network design modeling | Mathematical model |
Gottge et al. [8] | Big Data analysis | Data-sharing improvement | Qualitative content analysis | Case-based |
Gupta et al. [125] | Simulation | Data security improvement | Zero-Knowledge Proof | Case-based |
Legenvre et al. [126] | Internet of Things | Supplier performance management | Interview | Conceptual |
Nandankar and Sachan [127] | E-procurement | Purchasing performance enhancement | Literature review | Survey |
Nicoletti [128] | Procurement 4.0 | Purchasing performance enhancement | Literature review | Survey |
Pu et al. [129] | Smart manufacturing | Supplier performance management | Agent-based SC model | Mathematical model |
Schulze-Horn et al. [130] | Artificial intelligence | Purchasing performance enhancement | Interview | Case-based |
Zhang et al. [131] | Simulation | Reducing the relevant costs | Multi-population differential artificial bee colony algorithm | Case-based |
Kaur and Singh [132] | Simulation | Risk management | a Mixed Integer Program (MIP | Case-based |
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. |
© 2021 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Jahani, N.; Sepehri, A.; Vandchali, H.R.; Tirkolaee, E.B. Application of Industry 4.0 in the Procurement Processes of Supply Chains: A Systematic Literature Review. Sustainability 2021, 13, 7520. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13147520
Jahani N, Sepehri A, Vandchali HR, Tirkolaee EB. Application of Industry 4.0 in the Procurement Processes of Supply Chains: A Systematic Literature Review. Sustainability. 2021; 13(14):7520. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13147520
Chicago/Turabian StyleJahani, Niloofar, Arash Sepehri, Hadi Rezaei Vandchali, and Erfan Babaee Tirkolaee. 2021. "Application of Industry 4.0 in the Procurement Processes of Supply Chains: A Systematic Literature Review" Sustainability 13, no. 14: 7520. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13147520
APA StyleJahani, N., Sepehri, A., Vandchali, H. R., & Tirkolaee, E. B. (2021). Application of Industry 4.0 in the Procurement Processes of Supply Chains: A Systematic Literature Review. Sustainability, 13(14), 7520. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13147520