Next Article in Journal
Real-Time Implementation of an Optimized Model Predictive Control for a 9-Level CSC Inverter in Grid-Connected Mode
Previous Article in Journal
Education for Sustainable Development: Sustainability-Related Food Labels
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Review of Remediation Solutions for Acid Mine Drainage Using the Modified Hill Framework

by
Sandisiwe Khanyisa Thisani
1,*,
Daramy Vandi Von Kallon
1 and
Patrick Byrne
2
1
Department of Mechanical and Industrial Engineering Technology, University of Johannesburg, Johannebsurg 2006, South Africa
2
School of Biological and Environmental Sciences, Liverpool John Moores University, Liverpool L2 2QP, UK
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Sustainability 2021, 13(15), 8118; https://doi.org/10.3390/su13158118
Submission received: 9 June 2021 / Revised: 11 July 2021 / Accepted: 13 July 2021 / Published: 21 July 2021
(This article belongs to the Section Environmental Sustainability and Applications)

Abstract

This paper reviews the Acid Mine Drainage (AMD) remediation potential and operational costs of twelve existing AMD remediation methods against Class 0 and Class I AMD geochemical characteristics as defined in the Modified Hill Framework. Of the twelve remediation options reviewed in this study, eleven required additional process steps either for further treatment to achieve the discharge limits or for the safe management of hazardous waste by-products. Chemical desalination showed the greatest potential with high quality treated water and operational costs between USD 0.25 and USD 0.75 per cubic meter treated. The management of the toxic metal and sulphide by-products remains a key challenge that requires further research for sustainable mine water remediation. Further development of end-to-end methods suitable for Class 0 AMD with economical operational costs is recommended in order to effectively address the ongoing environmental challenges posed by AMD globally.
Keywords: Acid Mine Drainage (AMD); geochemical classification; AMD remediation technologies; AMD remediation costs; AMD remediation efficiency; mine-water treatment Acid Mine Drainage (AMD); geochemical classification; AMD remediation technologies; AMD remediation costs; AMD remediation efficiency; mine-water treatment

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Thisani, S.K.; Kallon, D.V.V.; Byrne, P. Review of Remediation Solutions for Acid Mine Drainage Using the Modified Hill Framework. Sustainability 2021, 13, 8118. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13158118

AMA Style

Thisani SK, Kallon DVV, Byrne P. Review of Remediation Solutions for Acid Mine Drainage Using the Modified Hill Framework. Sustainability. 2021; 13(15):8118. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13158118

Chicago/Turabian Style

Thisani, Sandisiwe Khanyisa, Daramy Vandi Von Kallon, and Patrick Byrne. 2021. "Review of Remediation Solutions for Acid Mine Drainage Using the Modified Hill Framework" Sustainability 13, no. 15: 8118. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13158118

APA Style

Thisani, S. K., Kallon, D. V. V., & Byrne, P. (2021). Review of Remediation Solutions for Acid Mine Drainage Using the Modified Hill Framework. Sustainability, 13(15), 8118. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13158118

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop