Next Article in Journal
Artificial Neural Networks to Forecast Failures in Water Supply Pipes
Previous Article in Journal
Gemini Principles-Based Digital Twin Maturity Model for Asset Management
 
 
Article
Peer-Review Record

Antecedents of Emotional Intelligence: Perceived Organizational Support Impact on Ambidextrous Behavior of Standalone Business School Faculty

Sustainability 2021, 13(15), 8227; https://doi.org/10.3390/su13158227
by Uma Maheswari Gopinath 1, Nishad Nawaz 2,*, Vijayakumar Gajenderan 3 and Hariswaran Balasubramaniyan 4
Reviewer 1: Anonymous
Reviewer 2: Anonymous
Reviewer 3: Anonymous
Sustainability 2021, 13(15), 8227; https://doi.org/10.3390/su13158227
Submission received: 9 June 2021 / Revised: 14 July 2021 / Accepted: 18 July 2021 / Published: 23 July 2021

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

It is advisable to improve the conclusions drawn from the research

Author Response

Response to Reviewers 1

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Reviewer 2 Report

Given the nature and complexity of the statistical analysis, additional narrative outlining the outcomes of the statistical procedures would be helpful. The amount of literature provided should also. be reflected in the discussion and subsequent recommendations. Minor elaboration on methods, including more specific descriptions of the faculty participants.

Author Response

Response to Reviewers 2

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Reviewer 3 Report

First of all thank you for allowing me to review your manuscript

it is a well founded and elaborated work, then I will make some suggestions that could improve your manuscript,

In the statistical analysis section there is a lot of room for improvement,

I recommend that the authors who work on it more incorporate the APA regulations into the tables and, above all, write the results.

The introduction must also be linked to the discussion, it does not make much sense to provide some quotes in one of the sections and not relate it to the other

I also recommend reviewing the existing literature if some important citations are missing

One last recommendation is to review the scientific writing style. I hope this improves your manuscript.

Thank you again for allowing me to read it.

Author Response

Response to Reviewers 3

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Round 2

Reviewer 3 Report

First of all, thank you for allowing me to review your manuscript.

The authors have addressed each and every one of the reviewers' suggestions

Back to TopTop