Next Article in Journal
Water Footprint Assessment of Carbon in Pulp Gold Processing in Turkey
Next Article in Special Issue
How Does Research on Sustainable Human Resource Management Contribute to Corporate Sustainability: A Document Co-Citation Analysis, 1982–2021
Previous Article in Journal
A Case Study on Emerging Learning Pathways in SDG-Focused Engineering Studies through Applying CBL
Previous Article in Special Issue
Do National Values of Culture and Sustainability Influence Direct Employee PDM Levels and Scope? The Search for a European Answer
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Sustainable Human Resource Management and Generational Diversity: The Importance of the Age Management Pillars

by
Natália Vraňaková
*,
Zdenka Gyurák Babeľová
and
Andrea Chlpeková
Institute of Industrial Engineering and Management, Faculty of Materials Science and Technology in Trnava, Slovak University of Technology in Bratislava, Jána Bottu č. 2781/25, 917 24 Trnava, Slovakia
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Sustainability 2021, 13(15), 8496; https://doi.org/10.3390/su13158496
Submission received: 30 May 2021 / Revised: 26 July 2021 / Accepted: 27 July 2021 / Published: 29 July 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Sustainability and Human Resources Management)

Abstract

The issue of population aging is currently highly topical. In the context of population aging, age management comes to the fore. It addresses the management of human resources with regard to the age and potential of employees. The main aim of the article is to present the results of research focused on the importance of age management pillars from the perspective of employees from different generational groups in industrial enterprises in Slovakia. Based on established research questions and the research hypothesis, we can state that the perceived importance of age management pillars differs depending on the affiliation to the generational group. The research hypothesis was confirmed, and we conclude that there is a dependence between generational groups of employees from industrial enterprises in Slovakia and the importance of the age management pillars (the number of designations in a pairwise comparison). As a data collection tool, a research questionnaire was created. Collected data were evaluated based on a pairwise comparison of the perceived importance of age management pillars for employees. The research sample consisted of N = 384 respondents (employees of large industrial enterprises in Slovakia). When considering the research results, the use allows approaching the management of different generations of employees directly within the framework of sustainable human resource management. The research problem is also supported by resources and theoretical background.
Keywords: age management; generational diversity; industrial enterprises employees; sustainable human resource management age management; generational diversity; industrial enterprises employees; sustainable human resource management

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Vraňaková, N.; Gyurák Babeľová, Z.; Chlpeková, A. Sustainable Human Resource Management and Generational Diversity: The Importance of the Age Management Pillars. Sustainability 2021, 13, 8496. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13158496

AMA Style

Vraňaková N, Gyurák Babeľová Z, Chlpeková A. Sustainable Human Resource Management and Generational Diversity: The Importance of the Age Management Pillars. Sustainability. 2021; 13(15):8496. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13158496

Chicago/Turabian Style

Vraňaková, Natália, Zdenka Gyurák Babeľová, and Andrea Chlpeková. 2021. "Sustainable Human Resource Management and Generational Diversity: The Importance of the Age Management Pillars" Sustainability 13, no. 15: 8496. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13158496

APA Style

Vraňaková, N., Gyurák Babeľová, Z., & Chlpeková, A. (2021). Sustainable Human Resource Management and Generational Diversity: The Importance of the Age Management Pillars. Sustainability, 13(15), 8496. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13158496

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop