Do Knowledge and Experience Value Affect Green Tourism Activity Participation and Buying Decision? A Case Study of Natural Dyeing Experience in China
Abstract
:1. Introduction
2. Literature Review
2.1. Pro-Environmental Behaviour (PEB)
2.2. Green Consumerism and Green Purchase Behaviour
2.3. Tourists’ Demand in Green Tourism Activity
2.4. Variables Related to Three TPB Variables
2.5. Experience Value (EV)
2.6. Environmental Knowledge (EK)
2.7. Purchase Intention of Green Tourism Product
3. Methodology
3.1. Research Instrument Development
3.2. Participants and Procedures
4. Discussion
4.1. Data Analysis
4.2. Reliability and Validity Evaluation
4.3. Structural Model Evaluation
4.3.1. Direct Effect
4.3.2. Mediating Effect
4.3.3. The Series of Influence of Tourist’s EK and EV Variables Affect Green Purchase Behaviour
4.3.4. The Effectiveness between ATT, PBC, SN, and Green Purchase Behaviour
4.3.5. The Acceptability of EK Acquired by Tourists Participating in Green Tourism Activities
5. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Butcher, J. The United Nations International Year of Ecotourism: A critical analysis of development implications. Prog. Dev. Stud. 2016, 6, 146–156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Moswete, N.; Thapa, B. Factors that influence support for community-based ecotourism in the rural communities adjacent to the Kgalagadi Transfrontier Park, Botswana. J. Ecotourism 2015, 14, 243–263. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chirenje, L.I. Contribution of ecotourism to poverty alleviation in Nyanga, Zimbabwe. Chin. J. Popul. Resour. Environ. 2017, 15, 87–92. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Olya, H.G.T.; Akhshik, A. Tackling the Complexity of the Pro-environmental Behavior Intentions of Visitors to Turtle Sites. J. Travel Res. 2018, 58, 313–332. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sthapit, E. Examining the Antecedents of Spillover within the Context of Tourism: Activities, Memorable Tourism Experiences, Culinary-Gastronomic Experiences and Souvenir Perspective. Ph.D. Thesis, University of Vaasa, Vaasa, Finland, 2018. [Google Scholar]
- Shahid, M.; Salam, S.; Mohammad, F. Recent advancements in natural dye applications: A review. J. Clean. Prod. 2013, 53, 310–331. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ibrahim, N.A.; El-Gamal, A.R.; Gouda, M.; Mahrous, F. A new approach for natural dyeing and functional finishing of cotton cellulose. Carbohydr. Polym. 2010, 82, 1205–1211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kastenholz, E.; Eusébio, C.; Carneiro, M.J. Segmenting the rural tourist market by sustainable travel behaviour: Insights from village visitors in Portugal. J. Destin. Mark. Manag. 2018, 10, 132–142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Woo, E.; Kim Yeong, G. Consumer attitudes and buying behavior for green food products: From the aspect of green perceived value (GPV). Br. Food J. 2019, 121, 320–332. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sreen, N.; Purbey, S.; Sadarangani, P. Impact of culture, behavior and gender on green purchase intention. J. Retail. Consum. Serv. 2018, 41, 177–189. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fang, W.; Lien, C.; Huang, Y.; Han, G.; Shyu, G.; Chou, J.; Ng, E. Environmental Literacy on Ecotourism: A Study on Student Knowledge, Attitude, and Behavioral Intentions in China and Taiwan. Sustainability 2018, 10, 1886. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Uddin, S.M.F.; Khan, M.N. Young Consumer’s Green Purchasing Behavior: Opportunities for Green Marketing. J. Glob. Mark. 2018, 31, 270–281. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Han, W.; McCabe, S.; Wang, Y.; Chong, A.Y.L. Evaluating user-generated content in social media: An effective approach to encourage greater pro-environmental behavior in tourism? J. Sustain. Tour. 2017, 26, 600–614. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cheung, R.; Lam, A.Y.C.; Lau, M.M. Drivers of green product adoption: The role of green perceived value, green trust and perceived quality. J. Glob. Sch. Mark. Sci. 2015, 25, 232–245. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Han, H.; Eom, T.; Chung, H.; Lee, S.; Ryu, H.; Kim, W. Passenger Repurchase Behaviours in the Green Cruise Line Context: Exploring the Role of Quality, Image, and Physical Environment. Sustainability 2019, 11, 1985. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Huang, Y.-C.; Liu, C.-H.S. Moderating and mediating roles of environmental concern and ecotourism experience for revisit intention. Int. J. Contemp. Hosp. Manag. 2017, 29, 1854–1872. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Maichum, K.; Parichatnon, S.; Peng, K.-C. Application of the extended theory of planned behavior model to investigate purchase intention of green products among Thai consumers. Sustainability 2016, 8, 1077. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Antón, C.; Camarero, C.; Laguna-García, M. Experience value or satiety? The effects of the amount and variety of tourists’ activities on perceived experience. J. Travel Res. 2018, 57, 920–935. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wu, J.; Font, X.; Liu, J. Tourists’ Pro-environmental Behaviors: Moral Obligation or Disengagement? J. Travel Res. 2020, 60, 735–748. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Kim, M.-S.; Stepchenkova, S. Altruistic values and environmental knowledge as triggers of pro-environmental behavior among tourists. Curr. Issues Tour. 2019, 23, 1575–1580. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Larson, L.R.; Stedman, R.C.; Cooper, C.B.; Decker, D.J. Understanding the multi-dimensional structure of pro-environmental behavior. J. Environ. Psychol. 2015, 43, 112–124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chiu, Y.-T.H.; Lee, W.-I.; Chen, T.-H. Environmentally responsible behavior in ecotourism: Antecedents and implications. Tour. Manag. 2014, 40, 321–329. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shao, J. Sustainable consumption in China: New trends and research interests. Bus. Strategy Environ. 2019, 28, 1507–1517. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Khare, A. Green Apparel Buying: Role of Past Behavior, Knowledge and Peer Influence in the Assessment of Green Apparel Perceived Benefits. J. Int. Consum. Mark. 2019, 1–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Buffa, F. Young tourists and sustainability. Profiles, attitudes, and implications for destination strategies. Sustainability 2015, 7, 14042–14062. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- White, C.J. Culture, Emotions and Behavioural Intentions: Implications for Tourism Research and Practice. Curr. Issues Tour. 2005, 8, 510–531. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fishbein, M.; Ajzen, I. Understanding attitudes and predicting social behavior. J. Exp. Soc. Psychol. 1980, 52, 27–58. [Google Scholar]
- Ajzen, I. The theory of planned behavior. Organ. Behav. Hum. Decis. Process. 1991, 50, 179–211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chen, M.-F.; Tung, P.-J. Developing an extended Theory of Planned Behavior model to predict consumers’ intention to visit green hotels. Int. J. Hosp. Manag. 2014, 36, 221–230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nurul Amanina, A.B. Consumer Green Purchase Behaviour among Millennial Generation. Ph.D. Thesis, Universiti Utara Malaysia, Sintok, Malaysia, 2018. [Google Scholar]
- Tsen, C.-H.; Phang, G.; Hasan, H.; Buncha, M.R. Going Green: A Study of Consumers’willingness to Pay For Green Products in Kota Kinabalu. Int. J. Bus. Soc. 2006, 7, 40. [Google Scholar]
- Barber, N.; Taylor, D.C.; Deale, C.S. Wine Tourism, Environmental Concerns, and Purchase Intention. J. Travel Tour. Mark. 2010, 27, 146–165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hultman, M.; Kazeminia, A.; Ghasemi, V. Intention to visit and willingness to pay premium for ecotourism: The impact of attitude, materialism, and motivation. J. Bus. Res. 2015, 68, 1854–1861. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Untaru, E.-N.; Ispas, A.; Candrea, A.N.; Luca, M.; Epuran, G. Predictors of individuals’ intention to conserve water in a lodging context: The application of an extended Theory of Reasoned Action. Int. J. Hosp. Manag. 2016, 59, 50–59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Duan, Y.-C.; Ma, E.; Arcodia, C.; Hsiao, A. The xiao zi effect on motivation to visit wineries from an identity perspective: The case of China. J. Hosp. Tour. Manag. 2020, 45, 359–369. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ajzen, I.; Madden, T.J. Prediction of goal-directed behavior: Attitudes, intentions, and perceived behavioral control. J. Exp. Soc. Psychol. 1986, 22, 453–474. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lee, T.H.; Jan, F.-H. Ecotourism behavior of nature-based tourists: An integrative framework. J. Travel Res. 2018, 57, 792–810. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Holbrook, M.B. Consumer Value: A Framework for Analysis and Research; Psychology Press: London, UK, 1999. [Google Scholar]
- Rather, R.A. Customer experience and engagement in tourism destinations: The experiential marketing perspective. J. Travel Tour. Mark. 2019, 37, 15–32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Iso-Ahola, S.E. Toward a social psychological theory of tourism motivation: A rejoinder. Ann. Tour. Res. 1982, 9, 256–262. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zaichkowsky, J.L. Measuring the involvement construct. J. Consum. Res. 1985, 12, 341–352. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kumar, V.; Aksoy, L.; Donkers, B.; Venkatesan, R.; Wiesel, T.; Tillmanns, S. Undervalued or overvalued customers: Capturing total customer engagement value. J. Serv. Res. 2010, 13, 297–310. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Carmichael, B. Understanding the wine tourism experience for winery visitors in the Niagara region, Ontario, Canada. Tour. Geogr. 2005, 7, 185–204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chan, W.Y.; To, C.K.-M.; Chu, W.C. Desire for experiential travel, avoidance of rituality and social esteem: An empirical study of consumer response to tourism innovation. J. Innov. Knowl. 2016, 1, 24–35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Zacarias, D.; Loyola, R. How Ecotourism Affects Human Communities. In Ecotourism’s Promise and Peril; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2017; pp. 133–151. [Google Scholar]
- Kim, M.; Koo, D.-W. Visitors’ pro-environmental behavior and the underlying motivations for natural environment: Merging dual concern theory and attachment theory. J. Retail. Consum. Serv. 2020, 56, 102147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zeithaml, V.A.; Lemon, K.N.; Rust, R.T. Driving Customer Equity: How Customer Lifetime Value Is Reshaping Corporate Strategy; Simon and Schuster: New York, NY, USA, 2001. [Google Scholar]
- Taufique, K.M.R.; Siwar, C.; Chamhuri, N.; Sarah, F.H. Integrating General Environmental Knowledge and Eco-Label Knowledge in Understanding Ecologically Conscious Consumer Behavior. Procedia Econ. Financ. 2016, 37, 39–45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Liu, C.-H.; Huang, Y.-C. A natural capital model of influences for ecotourism intentions and the buffering effects of emotional values. J. Travel Tour. Mark. 2017, 34, 919–934. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hill, H.; Lynchehaun, F. Organic milk: Attitudes and consumption patterns. Br. Food J. 2002, 104, 526–542. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fryxell, G.E.; Lo, C.W. The influence of environmental knowledge and values on managerial behaviours on behalf of the environment: An empirical examination of managers in China. J. Bus. Ethics 2003, 46, 45–69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sharpley, R. Ecotourism: A consumption perspective. J. Ecotourism 2006, 5, 7–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jaafar, M.; Maideen, S.A. Ecotourism-related products and activities, and the economic sustainability of small and medium island chalets. Tour. Manag. 2012, 33, 683–691. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, H.; Lei, S.L. A structural model of residents’ intention to participate in ecotourism: The case of a wetland community. Tour. Manag. 2012, 33, 916–925. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sharma, N.; Sarmah, B. Consumer engagement in village eco-tourism: A case of the cleanest village in Asia—Mawlynnong. J. Glob. Sch. Mark. Sci. 2019, 29, 248–265. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- De Groot, J.I.; Steg, L. Relationships between value orientations, self-determined motivational types and pro-environmental behavioural intentions. J. Environ. Psychol. 2010, 30, 368–378. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Madden, T.J.; Ellen, P.S.; Ajzen, I. A comparison of the theory of planned behavior and the theory of reasoned action. Personal. Soc. Psychol. Bull. 1992, 18, 3–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Prebensen, N.K.; Kim, H.; Uysal, M. Cocreation as Moderator between the Experience Value and Satisfaction Relationship. J. Travel Res. 2016, 55, 934–945. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jamrozy, U.; Lawonk, K. The multiple dimensions of consumption values in ecotourism. Int. J. Cult. Tour. Hosp. Res. 2017, 11, 18–34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hair, J.F.; Ringle, C.M.; Sarstedt, M. Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling: Rigorous Applications, Better Results and Higher Acceptance. Long Range Plan. 2013, 46, 1–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sarstedt, M.; Ringle, C.M.; Hair, J.F. Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling. In Handbook of Market Research; Springer International Publishing: Basel, Switzerland, 2017; pp. 1–40. [Google Scholar]
- Cronbach, L. Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika 1951, 16, 297–334. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Bagozzi, R.P.; Yi, Y. On the evaluation of structural equation models. J. Acad. Mark. Sci. 1988, 16, 74–94. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fornell, C.; Larcker, D.F. Structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error: Algebra and statistics. J. Mark. Res. 1981, 39, 382–388. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chan, R.Y. Determinants of Chinese consumers’ green purchase behavior. Psychol. Mark. 2001, 18, 389–413. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Paul, J.; Modi, A.; Patel, J. Predicting green product consumption using theory of planned behavior and reasoned action. J. Retail. Consum. Serv. 2016, 29, 123–134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- UNESCO. World Heritage List-China; UNESCO: Landais, France, 2020. [Google Scholar]
- Tisdell, C.A.; Tisdell, C.A. Tourism Economics, the Environment and Development: Analysis and Policy; Edward Elgar: Cheltenham, UK, 2001. [Google Scholar]
- Wang, S.-M. Identifying Niche Markets for Taiwan’s Inbound Tourism. Int. J. Organ. Innov. 2015, 7, 96–114. [Google Scholar]
Dimension | Code | Question Items | References | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Environmental knowledge (EK) | EK1 | I am aware that chemical pollutants are produced during manufacturing of synthetic or manufactured fibres such as polyester. | Khare [24] | |
EK2 | I am aware that air pollution can occur during some common dye processes of textiles. | |||
EK3 | I am aware that dyeing and finishing processes use a lot of water. | |||
EK4 | I am aware that it is very difficult to recycle the wastewater created by textile and apparel dyeing and finishing processes. | |||
Attitude towards purchasing green tourism products (ATT) | ATT1 | I think it makes sense to purchase green products made with traditional techniques. | Maichum et al. [17] | |
ATT2 | I think that purchasing green product with traditional techniques is a good idea. | |||
ATT3 | I think that purchasing green product with traditional techniques is safe. | |||
Subjective norm (SN) | SN1 | My family think that I should purchase green products rather than normal products. | Maichum et al. [17] | |
SN2 | My close friends think that I should purchase green products rather than normal products. | |||
SN3 | My close friends and family members would appreciate if I purchase green products. | |||
Perceived behavioural control (PBC) | PBC1 | I am confident that I can purchase natural dyeing products in a workshop. | Maichum et al. [17] | |
PBC2 | I see myself as capable of purchasing natural dyeing products in a workshop. | |||
PBC3 | I have resources, time, and willingness to purchase natural dyeing products in workshop. | |||
Purchase intention of green tourism products (PI) | PI1 | After the natural dyeing experience, I have a high desire to purchase the ecological natural dyeing products displayed in a workshop. | Woo; Kim [9] | |
PI2 | Overall, in a workshop, I am very happy to buy ecological natural dyeing products because they are environmentally friendly. | |||
PI3 | I would purchase the ecological natural dyeing products in a workshop, even if I have to give up some quality. | |||
Experience value | Attainment (ATM) | ATM1 | I have made the most of my time during the visit. | Antón et al. [18] |
ATM2 | I have seen and/or done many interesting things at the workshop. | |||
ATM3 | I have enjoyed a full experience at the workshop. | |||
Learning (LN) | LN1 | The experience has been enriching. | ||
LN2 | During the visit, I have learnt things I didn’t know. | |||
LN3 | The experience has been instructive. | |||
Escapism (ESC) | ESC1 | The visit has enabled me to leave my cares and pressure behind. | ||
ESC2 | The visit has enabled me to get away from it all. | |||
ESC3 | The visit has enabled me to forget everything else. | |||
Fantasy (FAN) | FAN1 | The visit has stirred my imagination. | ||
FAN2 | During the visit, I have built my own fantasies and hopes. | |||
FAN3 | I have felt captivated by the visit. |
Items | Classification | Frequency | Percentage |
---|---|---|---|
Gender | Male | 135 | 38.68 |
Female | 214 | 61.32 | |
Age | Below 18 years old | 30 | 8.60 |
19–29 years old | 186 | 53.30 | |
30–39 years old | 45 | 12.89 | |
40–49 years old | 20 | 5.73 | |
50–59 years old | 42 | 12.03 | |
Over 60 years old | 26 | 7.45 | |
Education level | High school and below | 100 | 28.65 |
Diploma or bachelor’s degree | 166 | 47.56 | |
Master’s degree | 57 | 16.33 | |
Doctorate and above | 26 | 7.45 | |
Area of residence | Anhui | 1 | 0.29 |
Beijing | 87 | 24.93 | |
Northeast China | 3 | 0.86 | |
Fujian | 2 | 0.57 | |
Guangdong | 117 | 33.52 | |
Guizhou | 3 | 0.86 | |
Hebei | 1 | 0.29 | |
Henan | 3 | 0.86 | |
Hubei | 1 | 0.29 | |
Hong Kong | 4 | 1.15 | |
Jiangsu | 2 | 0.57 | |
Jiangxi | 1 | 0.29 | |
Macau | 16 | 4.58 | |
Ningxia | 2 | 0.57 | |
Shandong | 1 | 0.29 | |
Shanxi | 1 | 0.29 | |
Shanghai | 36 | 10.32 | |
Sichuan | 1 | 0.29 | |
Tianjin | 31 | 8.88 | |
Taiwan | 1 | 0.29 | |
Xinjiang | 1 | 0.29 | |
Yunnan | 1 | 0.29 | |
Zhejiang | 33 | 9.46 | |
Monthly personal income (RMB) | 3000 and below | 84 | 24.07 |
3001–6000 | 63 | 18.05 | |
6001–9000 | 53 | 15.19 | |
9001–12,000 | 75 | 21.49 | |
12,001–15,000 | 43 | 12.32 | |
More than 15,000 | 31 | 8.88 | |
Willingness to spend on green tourism product (RMB) | 500 and below | 164 | 46.99 |
501–1000 | 94 | 26.93 | |
1001–3000 | 49 | 14.04 | |
More than 3000 | 42 | 12.03 |
Constructs | Items | Factor Loadings | Cronbach’s α | Composite Reliability (CR) | Average Variance Extracted (AVE) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
ATM | ATM1 | 0.789 | 0.793 | 0.879 | 0.707 |
ATM2 | 0.868 | ||||
ATM3 | 0.864 | ||||
ATT | ATT1 | 0.808 | 0.787 | 0.875 | 0.700 |
ATT2 | 0.869 | ||||
ATT3 | 0.831 | ||||
EK | EK1 | 0.750 | 0.794 | 0.866 | 0.619 |
EK2 | 0.814 | ||||
EK3 | 0.795 | ||||
EK4 | 0.787 | ||||
ESC | ESC1 | 0.861 | 0.755 | 0.860 | 0.673 |
ESC2 | 0.835 | ||||
ESC3 | 0.762 | ||||
FAN | FAN1 | 0.863 | 0.842 | 0.904 | 0.759 |
FAN2 | 0.878 | ||||
FAN3 | 0.873 | ||||
LN | LN1 | 0.903 | 0.868 | 0.919 | 0.792 |
LN2 | 0.874 | ||||
LN3 | 0.891 | ||||
PBC | PBC1 | 0.880 | 0.818 | 0.891 | 0.731 |
PBC2 | 0.804 | ||||
PBC3 | 0.877 | ||||
PI | PI1 | 0.852 | 0.779 | 0.871 | 0.693 |
PI2 | 0.859 | ||||
PI3 | 0.786 | ||||
SN | SN1 | 0.862 | 0.805 | 0.885 | 0.720 |
SN2 | 0.848 | ||||
SN3 | 0.835 |
ATM | ATT | EK | ESC | FAN | LN | PBC | PI | SN | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ATM | 0.839 * | ||||||||
ATT | 0.266 | 0.835 * | |||||||
EK | 0.321 | 0.273 | 0.787 * | ||||||
ESC | 0.344 | 0.040 | 0.137 | 0.820 * | |||||
FAN | 0.532 | 0.401 | 0.249 | 0.199 | 0.868 * | ||||
LN | 0.475 | 0.437 | 0.387 | 0.331 | 0.530 | 0.890 * | |||
PBC | 0.309 | 0.279 | 0.204 | 0.232 | 0.331 | 0.401 | 0.855 * | ||
PI | 0.213 | 0.378 | 0.182 | 0.156 | 0.397 | 0.396 | 0.355 | 0.833 * | |
SN | 0.221 | 0.348 | 0.299 | 0.190 | 0.231 | 0.366 | 0.390 | 0.380 | 0.848 * |
Direct Paths | Path Coefficient | SD | t-Value | p Value | Hypotheses | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
H1 | EV -> ATT | 0.316 | 0.066 | 4.767 | 0.000 *** | Accepted |
H2 | EV -> SN | 0.350 | 0.057 | 6.103 | 0.000 *** | Accepted |
H3 | EV -> PBC | 0.420 | 0.066 | 6.383 | 0.000 *** | Accepted |
H4 | EK -> ATT | 0.085 | 0.069 | 1.233 | 0.218 | Rejected |
H5 | EK -> PBC | 0.047 | 0.068 | 0.690 | 0.491 | Rejected |
H6 | ATT -> PI | 0.240 | 0.073 | 3.305 | 0.001 ** | Accepted |
H7 | SN -> PI | 0.216 | 0.073 | 2.976 | 0.003 ** | Accepted |
H8 | SN -> ATT | 0.215 | 0.066 | 3.275 | 0.001 ** | Accepted |
H9 | PBC -> PI | 0.204 | 0.069 | 2.947 | 0.003 ** | Accepted |
Variables | Path Coefficient | SD | t-Value | p-Value | Mediation Role |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
EV -> ATT -> PI | 0.076 | 0.032 | 2.365 | 0.018 * | Supported |
EV -> SN -> PI | 0.076 | 0.030 | 2.536 | 0.012 * | Supported |
EV -> PBC -> PI | 0.086 | 0.035 | 2.488 | 0.013 * | Supported |
EV -> SN -> ATT | 0.075 | 0.027 | 2.816 | 0.005 ** | Supported |
SN -> ATT -> PI | 0.052 | 0.021 | 2.492 | 0.013 * | Supported |
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. |
© 2021 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Zhang, X.V.; Chan, S.H.G. Do Knowledge and Experience Value Affect Green Tourism Activity Participation and Buying Decision? A Case Study of Natural Dyeing Experience in China. Sustainability 2021, 13, 8579. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13158579
Zhang XV, Chan SHG. Do Knowledge and Experience Value Affect Green Tourism Activity Participation and Buying Decision? A Case Study of Natural Dyeing Experience in China. Sustainability. 2021; 13(15):8579. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13158579
Chicago/Turabian StyleZhang, Xiaocheng Vicky, and Suk Ha Grace Chan. 2021. "Do Knowledge and Experience Value Affect Green Tourism Activity Participation and Buying Decision? A Case Study of Natural Dyeing Experience in China" Sustainability 13, no. 15: 8579. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13158579
APA StyleZhang, X. V., & Chan, S. H. G. (2021). Do Knowledge and Experience Value Affect Green Tourism Activity Participation and Buying Decision? A Case Study of Natural Dyeing Experience in China. Sustainability, 13(15), 8579. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13158579