Next Article in Journal
Financial Development and Renewables in Southeast Asian Countries—The Role of Organic Waste Materials
Next Article in Special Issue
Improvement of Container Terminal Productivity with Knowledge about Future Transport Modes: A Theoretical Agent-Based Modelling Approach
Previous Article in Journal
Elasticity of the Number of World Cruise Tourists Using the Vector Error Correction Model
Previous Article in Special Issue
Optimal Urban Transit Investment Model and Its Application
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Comprehensive Operation Risk Assessment of a Highway Maintenance Area Based on Reliability

The Key Laboratory of Road and Traffic Engineering of Ministry of Education, Tongji University, Shanghai 201804, China
Sustainability 2021, 13(16), 8744; https://doi.org/10.3390/su13168744
Submission received: 29 June 2021 / Revised: 27 July 2021 / Accepted: 31 July 2021 / Published: 5 August 2021
(This article belongs to the Collection Sustainable Transport Economics, Behaviour and Policy)

Abstract

:
To study the influence of various working conditions on traffic safety in the maintenance area of a mountain expressway, 675 groups of PTV VISSIM traffic simulation experiments were designed with various traffic organization modes, traffic volumes, traffic compositions, activity area lengths, and speed limit values. The results show that the activity area length of a closed lane, a compressed lane, and a borrowed opposite lane had no marked influence on the traffic conflicts. There was a significant positive correlation between the proportion of trucks and the number of traffic conflicts, and the number of traffic conflicts increased significantly with an increase in traffic volume. In the closed lane and borrowed opposite lane scenarios, the increase in traffic conflicts was more obvious with the increase in traffic volume. There were obvious differences in the number of traffic conflicts under different forms of traffic organization. The number of conflicts in the compressed lane scenario was the lowest, and in the borrowed opposite lane scenario the number of conflicts was the highest. There was a significant correlation between a decrease in the speed limit and an increase in the number of traffic conflicts. Finally, with traffic volume, truck proportion, and speed limit values as independent variables and reliability as a dependent variable, linear regression equations of reliability were established for three traffic organization scenarios: closed lane, borrowed opposite lane, and compressed lane.

1. Introduction

The expressway maintenance operation area is a typical traffic bottleneck area and an accident-prone area. Taking the Guizhou Expressway located in the mountainous area as an example, a total of 26,465 traffic accidents occurred from 2016 to 2019, of which 252 occurred directly in the maintenance operation area, accounting for 0.95%. Carrying out the risk assessment of the safe operation of the maintenance operation area is of great significance for reducing driving safety accidents.
Regarding the evaluation of the safety risks of highway maintenance work areas to improve the level of safe operation, it is mainly based on actual survey data and statistical data that allow a macro analysis and an evaluation of risks from indicators such as vehicle speed dispersion, cross-sectional vehicle speed changes, and vehicle operating speeds by vehicle type to be carried out [1,2,3,4]. Richard and Dudek’s research found that an excessively high vehicle speed is the cause of the high incidence of accidents in the maintenance work area, and the safety of the work area can be improved by speed limits [5]. Huang’s VISSIM simulation research results showed that a speed limit below 30 km/h can effectively reduce the vehicle speed variance and reduce the accident rate [6]. The Manual of Unified Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD2009) in the US clarifies that the speed limit in the construction area cannot be lower than 16 km/h, and this value is determined by the influence of the speed variance [7,8]. According to different design speeds, the “Safety Operating Regulations for Highway Maintenance” stipulates different speed limits of 80 km/h, 60 km/h and 40 km/h on expressways. It also stipulates that gradual speed limits and repeated prompts for speed limits can be adopted [9].
As for the safety risk evaluation index system and the safety evaluation model, Wu established a road maintenance traffic accident risk prediction model based on the grey system theory [10]. In the study by Wu et al. [11], the Bayesian theory was used which has established an evaluation index system for operating risks in highway maintenance work areas and proposed control countermeasures for operating risks. Wu et al. [12,13,14] established an indicator system for traffic safety influencing factors in expressway operation areas from the point of view of people, vehicles, roads, and the environment, and based on DEMADAL and other methods. They also established an identification model for traffic safety influencing factors in the operation area. Li established a maintenance work area construction risk source system and work area risk hierarchical management measures, and macroscopically pointed out the safety evaluation and management focus of expressway construction areas [15]. Ding used the Bayesian network model to evaluate the construction risks in the work area, identified the main risk factors in the construction process, built the Bayesian network model, and graded the risks [16]. Chen used the grey evaluation theory to evaluate the driving risk in the maintenance operation area and to classify the hazard sources [17]. Wang carried out a safety evaluation and early warning research on highway construction in mountainous areas [18]. Zhu established a traffic conflict analysis model for highway overhaul projects and proposed a traffic organization plan for the maintenance operation areas of highway overhaul projects [19]. Tian used the BP neural network to identify the main risk sources in the maintenance work area and to build a risk management system based on the Near-Miss risk management theory [20]. Li established a safety prevention system for mountain highway construction [21]. Liang evaluated the effects of different work area layouts based on the conflict rate [22].
The road traffic system is a dynamic coupling system that is composed of factors such as people, vehicles, roads, and road environment [23]. Human factors, vehicle structure and use factors, the protection of construction workers, and the maintenance of construction machinery, traffic signs and other safety facilities and passing vehicles together constitute the local road environment and are the factors that we focus on in this paper [24,25,26].
Reliability is defined as the probability that a component, product, or system can complete its specified function without failure in a specified environment, within a specified time, and under specified conditions. In 1939, the reliability theory was first proposed by the American Aviation Commission to evaluate the accident rate of aircraft [27]. Subsequently, the reliability theory was widely used in various industries, and it played a particularly important role in reducing system failure rates, improving system anti-risk capabilities, and reducing losses caused by failures. The transportation field also began to use the reliability theory for related research. A study by the Japanese scholars Mine and Kawai put forward the concept of connectivity reliability to study the operational status of road networks under disaster conditions such as earthquakes, and first introduced reliability into the field of transportation [28]. Asakusa et al. [29] proposed the concept of operating time reliability, which is defined as the probability of a vehicle starting at point O and ending at point D within a specified time which is used to describe the operating state of the road network. Anthony Chen proposed the definition of road network capacity reliability, which is used to express the probability that the road network capacity can meet the traffic needs of road users under certain service level conditions [30]. Zhu et al. proposed a method to evaluate the traffic network by using the reliability of the traffic network [31]. Chen et al. [32] put forward the concept of unblocked reliability. They believed that there is a randomness in traffic supply and demand. The state where the actual traffic capacity of the road can meet the actual road traffic demand is regarded as the unblocked state, and the road reliability is evaluated from the perspective of supply and demand. Pei et al. [33] pointed out that there is a difference between the reliability of the urban road network and the reliability of the road network. They respectively analysed the influencing factors of the two, defined the connotation of the road network operation reliability, and proposed the Monte Carlo method for the road network operation reliability. In relation to the simulation method, Zang studied the travel time reliability of arterial highways under ice and snow conditions and established a corresponding reliability model [34]. Dong et al. used the negative binomial model to study the frequency of accidents in the maintenance work area. The results show that the frequency of accidents increases with the duration of the work area, the length of the work area and the average daily traffic flow [35]. Xu analysed the risk of rear-end collision in the construction area of an expressway through modelling, and the results showed that the rear-end collision in the construction area is related to the length of the work area, traffic flow, truck ratio, construction area type, etc., [36]. Zhou et al. [37] proposed that traffic volume, vehicle rate, lane closure type, the lateral distance of the closed lane, the slope, and the length of the work area are the main factors that affect the traffic in the maintenance work area.
The highway maintenance operation control area is generally arranged in order into six areas, such as the warning area. In reliability theory, the maintenance work area can be regarded as a system composed of these six elements. In the process of traffic operation, the occurrence of an accident may cause traffic congestion or an interruption in the road section. After the accident has been handled, the traffic operation returns to normal. This phenomenon conforms to the description of system failure in the reliability theory. The reliability system can be used to simulate the maintenance work area system.
Therefore, based on the characteristics of high-speed truck traffic in mountainous areas, which include a relatively small work area length and relatively low speed limit values, this paper designs 3 types of traffic flows, 5 types of intersection components, 5 types of work area lengths, 3 types of speed limit values, 3 kinds of traffic organization methods, and a total of 675 groups of VISSIM traffic simulation experiments based on the reliability theory to analyse the number of traffic conflicts under different working conditions. The conclusions of this study have important practical significance for the traffic organization of the maintenance work area.

2. Methods

2.1. Scenario Design

Traffic conflict mainly analyses and evaluates the micro-risk level between different vehicles to determine the level of traffic safety, which is used as an index to replace traffic accidents to evaluate road traffic safety [38] and which has been widely used in safety evaluation research of urban road intersections and highway traffic ramps, etc., [39,40]. In 1977, the first International Traffic Conflict Academic Conference was held in Oslo, Norway. The conference first proposed the concept of traffic conflict. Traffic conflict is when, at a certain time node, two or more road user space locations are very close, and without a change in the state of motion, the phenomenon of collision danger will occur [41]. Traffic conflicts can generally be divided into intersection conflicts and road section conflicts. According to the conflict form, road section conflicts can be divided into forward, rear-end collision, crossing, and collision with fixed objects [42]. Since the introduction of the definition of traffic conflict, Chinese scholars have studied the correlation between traffic conflict and traffic accidents and have shown that there is a certain interchangeability between the two [43].
According to Chen’s analysis of the data of the highway work area in Indiana, USA, the related parameter of traffic volume and collision accident is 0.853 [44]. Wu analysed the relevant parameters of the Ha-A Expressway construction area in Heilongjiang Province to be 1.932, which showed that the collision frequency is significantly correlated with the traffic volume in the work area [45]. Studies have shown that as the ratio of medium and large vehicles to trucks increases, the overall trend of accident rates increases, and the reliability shows a downward trend. Through traffic simulation analysis, Chen et al. found that the greater the proportion of large vehicles, the greater the time and space range of the traffic impact of an accident [46]. Zhang conducted a simulation study on the speed limit value in the construction area of the expressway and found that the speed limit value and the conflict rate were binomial distributions, and that the speed limit in the construction area was not as low as possible [47]. Meng et al. conducted a study on the characteristics of traffic conflicts in a half-closed construction area of expressways, and the results showed that under the same other conditions, when the speed limit is higher than 50 km/h, the number of traffic conflicts will increase significantly as the speed limit increases [48]. The “Safety operation regulations for highway maintenance“ stipulates the speed limit values under different design vehicle speeds and reserved lane widths and sets the experimental speed limit values to 40, 60, and 80 km/km, respectively.
Taking the number of traffic conflicts as the index, the traffic organization mode, traffic volume, traffic composition, work area length, and speed limit value were selected as the experimental variables for a PTV VISSIM software simulation (PTV Group, Germany). The three traffic organization scenarios were closed lanes, borrowed opposite lanes, and compressed lanes. The settings of traffic volume, traffic composition, activity area length, and speed limit values are shown in Table 1, Table 2, Table 3 and Table 4.

2.2. Experimental Scenario

The basic VISSIM scenario modelled the Southwest Ring Road of China’s Guiyang Ring Expressway, with a twin four-lane roadway, a subgrade width of 26 m, and a design speed of 100 km/h.
For the basic scenario, the traffic organization mode, traffic volume, traffic composition, operation area length, and speed limit values were specified. In accordance with the enumeration method, 675 groups of VISSIM experiments were set up.

2.3. Driving Behaviour Parameter Setting

In accordance with China’s Standard JTG H30-2004, the safety operation regulations for highway maintenance, combined with the actual situation of the experimental section, the maintenance operation area was set up with a 2000 m warning zone section, a 120 m upstream transition zone section, an 80 m buffer zone section, a work zone section, a 50 m downstream transition zone section, a termination zone section, and a 2000 m normal driving section.

2.4. Speed Control

The expectation speed of the car was 120 km/h, the specified speed of the bus was 100 km/h, and the specified speed of the freight truck was 80 km/h. Under the condition of speed limits, the expected speeds in the operation area are shown in Table 5.

2.5. Output of Experimental Results

In Surrogate Safety Assessment Model (SSAM) software (U.S. Federal Highway Administration, Washington, DC, USA), various time-to-collision (TTC) values can be set to control the output of traffic conflicts of varying severity. The smaller the TTC value, the more serious the traffic conflicts will be. According to statistics from Meng on rear-end collision data in expressway construction areas, a conflict with a TTC of less than 2 s is defined as a serious conflict, and there is a strong correlation between serious conflicts and traffic accidents. In the experimental statistics, the threshold of 2 s was used, and a traffic conflict with a TTC of less than 2 s was taken as the number of section conflicts [49].
In SAAM software, the traffic conflicts are calculated by conflicts only between vehicles; conflicts between vehicles and obstacles and other objects are not considered. Therefore, the statistics of traffic conflicts include lane-changing conflicts and rear-end collisions, but not frontal traffic conflicts.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Analysis of the Relationship between Activity Area Length and Traffic Conflicts

Given the experimental variables, the relationship between the number of conflicts and the work area length is shown in Figure 1, Figure 2, Figure 3, Figure 4, Figure 5, Figure 6, Figure 7, Figure 8 and Figure 9.
In Figure 1, Figure 2, Figure 3, Figure 4, Figure 5, Figure 6, Figure 7, Figure 8 and Figure 9, it can be seen that in the closed lane, with an increase in the work area length, the number of traffic conflicts for each traffic volume and the proportion of trucks did not increase significantly. When the traffic volumes were 1600 veh/(ln·h)−1 and 1800 veh/(ln·h)−1, the number of traffic conflicts were maintained at a stable level at different work area lengths. When the traffic volume reached 2000 veh/(ln·h)−1, the number of traffic conflicts remained stable. The number of traffic conflicts showed a small upward trend.
When the traffic volumes were 1600 veh/(ln·h)−1 and 1800 veh/(ln·h)−1, there was no significant correlation between the number of traffic conflicts and the length of the work area in the opposite lane scenario, and the number of traffic conflicts basically remained the same. When the traffic volume was 2000 veh/(ln·h)−1 and the truck inflow rate was 0.4, the number of traffic conflicts increased obviously with the increase in the work area length. The results are shown in Figure 10, Figure 11 and Figure 12.
In the compressed lane scenario, when the speed limit was 60 km/h, the number of traffic conflicts had a small increasing trend with an increase in the work area length. When the speed limits were 40 km/h and 80 km/h, the number of traffic conflicts fluctuated with changes in the work area length.
A Pearson correlation was used to determine the correlation between the length of the work area and the number of traffic conflicts; the results are shown in Table 6, Table 7 and Table 8.
The significance of the three scenarios was p = {0.478, 0.563, 0.732} > 0.05, and the length of the work area had no significant effect on the number of traffic conflicts.

3.2. Impact of Truck Proportion on Traffic Conflicts

The relationship between traffic conflicts and freight truck proportion is shown in Figure 10, Figure 11, Figure 12, Figure 13, Figure 14, Figure 15, Figure 16, Figure 17 and Figure 18.
  • When the traffic volume was 1600 veh/(ln·h)−1, with an increase in truck proportion, the number of traffic conflicts in the three scenarios varied only slightly;
  • When the traffic volume was 1800 veh/(ln·h)−1, with an increase in truck proportion the number of traffic conflicts in the closed lane scenario increased slightly. However, the change range of the opposite lane scenario in the truck proportion range of 0.1 to 0.2 increased greatly. The change ranges were relatively slight at 0 to 0.1 and 0.2 to 0.4, and the overall change was more intense in the compressed lane scenario;
  • When the traffic volume was 1800 veh/(ln·h)1, the change in the closed lane and compressed lane scenarios had a more dramatic increasing trend. The change ranges in the borrowed opposite lane scenario were relatively slight at 0 to 0.1 and 0.2 to 0.4.
There was a close linear relation between the proportion of trucks and the number of traffic conflicts. A Pearson correlation test was performed, as shown in Table 9. The results show a significant relation between the proportion of trucks and the number of traffic conflicts (p = 0.000 < 0.05).

3.3. Impact of Traffic Volume on Traffic Conflict

The relationship between traffic volume and traffic conflict is shown in Figure 19, Figure 20, Figure 21, Figure 22, Figure 23, Figure 24, Figure 25, Figure 26 and Figure 27.
It can be seen from Figure 19, Figure 20, Figure 21, Figure 22, Figure 23, Figure 24, Figure 25, Figure 26 and Figure 27 that the number of traffic conflicts increased with the increase in traffic volume. In the closed lane and borrowed opposite lane scenarios, the increase in traffic conflicts was more obvious with the increase in traffic volume. In the compressed lane scenario, when the traffic volume increased from 1600 to 1800 veh/(ln·h)−1, the number of traffic conflicts increased, and the increase range was larger. When the traffic volume increased from 1800 to 2000 veh/(ln·h)−1, the increase in traffic conflict was basically unchanged.
A Pearson correlation analysis was performed on traffic volume and traffic conflict, and the results are shown in Table 10: p = 0.000 < 0.05, a significant difference.

3.4. Impact of Different Traffic Organization Forms on Traffic Conflict

There were obvious differences in the number of traffic conflicts in different forms of traffic organization. The number of conflicts in the three scenarios had a high-to-low sequence of opposite lane > closed lane > compressed lane. A Spearman correlation analysis was performed, and the results are shown in Table 11: p = 0.000 < 0.05. Specifying the different traffic organization forms and traffic conflicts also had important effects.

3.5. Impact of Different Speed Limits on Traffic Conflict

A Pearson correlation test was performed on the speed limit values and traffic conflicts in different scenarios; the results are shown in Table 12: p = 0.015 < 0.05, and there was a correlation between them.
In the VISSIM simulation experiment, the experimental vehicle reduced its speed through the secondary speed limit. In this process, different types of vehicles decelerated differently, and the speed dispersion increased, so conflicts between vehicles occurred easily. Moreover, the lower the final speed limit, the lower the road capacity, and the more likely the vehicles were to jam and queue in the merging area. This resulted in increased traffic conflicts, so the speed limit should not be lower than a certain level.

3.6. Section Reliability Analysis Based on Traffic Conflict

Section reliability refers to the probability of no accidents in a certain period. If an accident in the expressway system is defined as a failure, the failure rate is the number of accidents per unit time, and the reliability is calculated according to the failure rate. In general, most road accidents obey a Poisson distribution, and the interval time of the accidents follows a negative exponential distribution [50,51,52]. In accordance with the reliability theory, the reliability of the exponential distribution is calculated as:
R ( t ) = e λ t
where R ( t ) is the reliability function; λ is the number of accidents per unit time, taking 1 h as the unit; and t is the time, taking 24 h as the time to study the probability of no accidents in 1 d. The number of conflicts obtained by simulation is converted to λ . Based on 1 accident per 100,000 serious conflicts, the conversion is:
λ = N × 10 4
where N is the number of serious conflicts within 1 h.
Using Equations (1) and (2), the reliability of the experimental results was calculated, and the reliability of each scenario was determined. The reliability of the closed lane organization mode at a speed limit of 60 km/h and a flow rate of 1800 veh/h is shown in Table 13. The reliabilities of other groups were also calculated.
Taking traffic volume, truck proportion, and speed limit values as independent variables and reliability as a dependent variable, a linear regression analysis was performed for the reliability of closed lane, borrowed opposite lane, and compressed lane scenarios, and the regression equations were obtained as follows:
Borrowed opposite lane:
R = { 1 R 1 2.451 0.001 Q 0.755 P H + 0.001 X V 0 R < 1 0 R < 0
where R is section reliability, Q is the input flow, and P H is the proportion of freight cars. The speed limit value X V was 40 km/h, 60 km/h, and 80 km/h. The R squared was 0.804, p = 0.000 < 0.05, and the model was reliable. It can be seen from Equation (3) that the reliability decreased with the increase in flow rate and truck proportion.
Closed lanes:
R = { 1 R 1 3.342 0.001 Q 0.932 P H + 0.002 X V 0 R < 1 0 R < 0
The R squared was 0.934, p = 0.000 < 0.05.
Compressed lane:
R = { 1 R 1 7.010 0.002 Q 0.994 P H + 0.002 X V 0 R < 1 0 R < 0
The R squared was 0.868, p = 0.000 < 0.05, and the model was effective.
The regression equation shows that the reliability of the maintenance operation area in different traffic organization modes was affected by traffic volume, truck proportion, and speed limit value.
  • The traffic volume increased, the reliability decreased, and the traffic volume had a great influence on reliability. In a certain range, the traffic volume increased by 100 veh/(ln·h)1, and the reliability was at least 0.1;
  • The increase in freight car proportion led to a decrease in reliability;
  • The reliability increased with an increase in the speed limit of between 40 km/h and 80 km/h;
  • There were differences in the reliability of the maintenance operation area in different traffic organization modes.

3.7. Application Prospect Analysis

Since the absolute number of traffic accidents is relatively small, the safety evaluation of maintenance areas based on traffic conflicts has significant advantages. Firstly, the cycle of traffic conflicts is much shorter than the cycle of accidents, and the collection of conflict data is higher. The conflict data can be obtained by real-time observation or video analysis on the scene. Secondly, the sample size of traffic conflict data is large, and the traffic conflict data can be used for expressways in a short period of time. An observation of typical sections can obtain sufficient data to meet statistical requirements.
In the process of traffic operation, an accident may cause traffic congestion or road segment interruption. After the accident is handled, the traffic operation returns to normal. This phenomenon conforms to the description of system failure in the reliability theory, that is, the failure of the system or component is uncertain and will cause the system to be interrupted. After repair or replacement, the system can resume normal operation. Therefore, the maintenance work area is highly correlated with the reliability system theory. With reference to reliability theory, the maintenance work area can be regarded as a system composed of these six control areas, including the warning area.
The evaluation model takes into account the length of the work area, traffic flow, traffic composition, and traffic organization methods commonly used in mountainous expressways. The research results show that: First, there is a significant relationship between the proportion of trucks and the number of traffic conflicts. When the proportion of trucks increases, and the number of traffic conflicts increases. There is a need to focus on the traffic diversion modes of large trucks. Second, under the three traffic organization modes, the length of the work area does not have a significant impact on the number of traffic conflicts. Therefore, the length of the work area can be appropriately extended to improve the efficiency of maintenance operations. Third, the number of traffic conflicts showed an upward trend with the increase in traffic volume. When the traffic volume exceeds a certain value, the traffic organization method needs to be adjusted in time, and methods such as forced diversion should be adopted. Fourth, different forms of traffic organization and traffic conflicts also have significant effects. The number of collisions in the compressed lane scene had the least effect, and the number of traffic collisions in the opposite lane scene had the greatest effect. The reliability-based assessment model provides a new and firm plan for the traffic organization and safety risk assessment of mountain expressway maintenance operations.
The reliability-based assessment model provides a new solution for the traffic organization and safety risk assessment of mountain expressway maintenance operations.

4. Conclusions

This study determined the influence of various working conditions on traffic safety in the maintenance area of a mountain expressway. The main conclusions are summarised as follows.
The length of the work area had no significant influence on the number of traffic conflicts, and the proportion of freight cars to traffic conflicts was close to linear. According to the Pearson correlation test, there was a significant relation between freight car proportion and traffic conflict number, and the two were positively correlated. The number of traffic conflicts increased with an increase in traffic volume. In the closed lane and borrowing opposite lane scenarios, the increase in traffic conflicts was more obvious with an increase in traffic volume. According to the Pearson correlation test, there was a significant relationship between traffic volume and the number of traffic conflicts. Moreover, there were obvious differences in the number of traffic conflicts under different forms of traffic organization. The number of conflicts in the compressed lane scenario was the lowest, the number of conflicts in the opposite lane scenario was the highest, and the number of conflicts in the closed lane scenario was in the middle. According to the Pearson correlation test, a decrease in the speed limit correlated with the number of traffic conflicts.
Taking traffic volume, truck proportion, and speed limit as independent variables and reliability as a dependent variable, reliability linear regression equations of three traffic organization scenarios, namely, closed lane, borrowing opposite lane, and compressed lane, were established, and the validity of the model was verified.
As the traffic volume increased, the reliability decreased, and the traffic volume had a great influence on reliability. In a certain range, the traffic volume increased by 100 veh/(ln·h)−1, and the reliability was at least 0.1. An increase in freight car proportion led to a decrease in reliability. The reliability increased with an increase in the speed limit between 40 km/h and 80 km/h. There were differences in the reliability of the maintenance operation area in different traffic organization modes.
These findings have theoretical significance for the application of a comprehensive operation risk assessment of maintenance areas based on reliability. Even so, more work needs to be completed in the future. Next, driver behaviour characteristics and different control methods should be studied according to different levels of traffic risk.

Funding

This research was funded by the Science and technology project of the Guizhou Transportation Department (grant no. 2019-121-014).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The data used to support the finding of this study are available upon request to Nan Ouyang, [email protected].

Conflicts of Interest

The author declares no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Yang, Y. Research on the Safety Assessment of Freeway Based on Operating Speed. Master’s Thesis, Hunan University, Changsha, China, 2012. [Google Scholar]
  2. Liu, Z.; Wang, Z.; Qian, W. Analysis of Traffic Accidents Based on Speed. China Saf. Sci. J. 2005, 15, 35–38. [Google Scholar]
  3. Hu, G. Research on Safety Evaluation and Improvement Strategies of Freeway Traffic Flow. Master’s Thesis, Chongqing Jiaotong University, Chongqing, China, 2008. [Google Scholar]
  4. Gao, J. Evaluation of Expressway Operation Safety and Countermeasures. Ph.D. Thesis, Tongji University, Shanghai, China, 2005. [Google Scholar]
  5. Richards, S.; Dudek, C. Implementation of Work-Zone Speed Control Measures; Transportation Research Board: Washington, DC, USA, 1986. [Google Scholar]
  6. Kai, H.; Yong, H.; Jian, T. Research on speed limit of Work Zones in the Freeway. In Proceedings of the 2010 International Conference on Optoelectronics and Image Processing, Washington, DC, USA, 11 November 2010; Volume 2, pp. 277–282. [Google Scholar]
  7. Porter, R. Estimation of Relationships between 85th Percentile Speeds, Speed Deviations, Roadway and Roadside Geometry and Traffic Control in Freeway Work Zones. Ph.D. Thesis, the Pennsylvania State University, Philadelphia, PA, USA, 2007. [Google Scholar]
  8. Minnesota Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices; Minnesota Department of Transportation: Minneapolis, MN, USA, 2012.
  9. Wang, S.; Liu, Z.; Ge, Z. Industry Standards of the People’s Republic of China, Safety Work Rules for Highway Maintenance (JTG H30-2015); Ministry of Transport of the People’s Republic of China: Beijing, China, 2015. [Google Scholar]
  10. Wu, B.; Yang, P. Prediction of traffic accident risk during road maintenance. Ergonomics 1995, 1, 32–34. [Google Scholar]
  11. Wu, B.; Liu, K. Research on Safety Evaluation and Counter measures of Highway Construction and Maintenance. Shanghai Highw. 1995, 3, 61–70. [Google Scholar]
  12. Wu, B.; Xu, H.; Dai, T. Identifying Safety Factors on Expressway Work Zone Based on DEMATEL and ISM. J. Transp. Syst. Eng. Inf. Technol. 2010, 10, 130–136. [Google Scholar]
  13. Wu, B.; Xu, H.; Dai, T. Comparative Study on Identification Methods of Factors Affecting Driving Safety in Expressway Construction Area. J. Wuhan Univ. Technol. (Traffic Eng. Sci. Ed.) 2011, 35, 95–99. [Google Scholar]
  14. Wu, B.; Song, C.; Dai, T. Determination of Merging Conflict Risk Threshold Value and Traffic Conflict Prediction at Freeway Work Zone. J. Beijing Univ. Technol. 2014, 40, 561–566. [Google Scholar]
  15. Li, Z. Analysis and Control Technology of Highway Construction Safety. J. Shijiazhuang Railw. Inst. (Soc. Sci.) 2010, 4, 43–45, 93. [Google Scholar]
  16. Ding, B. Risk Evaluation and Control of Highway Maintenance based on Bayesian Network. Master’s Thesis, Changan University, Xi’an, China, 2017. [Google Scholar]
  17. Chen, K. Identification and Prevention of Important Dangerous Headstream Affect Construction Safety in City Construction. Constr. Technol. 2004, 33, 55–57. [Google Scholar]
  18. Wang, K. The Research on Construction Safety Assessment and Early Warning in Mountainous Expressway. Ph.D. Thesis, Wuhan University of Technology, Wuhan, China, 2009. [Google Scholar]
  19. Zhu, J. Study on Traffic Organization Scheme of Expressway Rehabilitation Engineering. Master’s Thesis, Changan University, Xi’an, China, 2009. [Google Scholar]
  20. Tian, W.; Li, H.; Yan, R. Study of safety management based on near-miss theory in highway special maintenance project. J. Xian Univ. Arch. Tech. (Nat. Sci. Ed.) 2013, 45, 548–553, 558. [Google Scholar]
  21. Li, T. Study on The Safety Management System and Risk Assessment Method of Highway Construction in Mountainous Area. Ph.D. Thesis, Changan University, Xi’an, China, 2013. [Google Scholar]
  22. Liang, G.; Cheng, G.; Wang, C. Relationship between mixing rate of freeway large vehicles and traffic flow stability. J. Chang’an Univ. (Nat. Sci. Ed.) 2014, 34, 120–126. [Google Scholar]
  23. Wang, W.; Sun, F. Theory and Method of Driving Behavior in Road Traffic System; Science Press: Beijing, China, 2001. [Google Scholar]
  24. Guo, X. Road Traffic Safety; Southeast University Press: Nanjing, China, 2001. [Google Scholar]
  25. Zuo, K. Research on Traffic Safety Safeguard of Freeway Reconstruction and Expansion Project Construction Process. Master’s Thesis, Changsha University of Science and Technology, Changsha, China, 2008. [Google Scholar]
  26. Wang, Y. System Engineering Theory, Method and Application, 2nd ed.; Beijing Higher Education Press: Beijing, China, 1998. [Google Scholar]
  27. Notes on Airworthiness Statistics; American Aviation Commission: Washington, DC, USA, 1939.
  28. Mine, H.; Kawai, H. Mathematics for Reliability Analysis; Asakura-shoten: Tokyo, Japan, 1982. [Google Scholar]
  29. Asakura, Y.; Kashiw, M. Road Network Reliability Caused by Daily Fluctuation of Traffic Flow. In Proceedings of the 19th PT RC Summer Annual Meeting, Proceedings Seminar G, Brighton, UK, 9–13 September 1991; pp. 73–84. [Google Scholar]
  30. Anthony, C.; Yang, H.; Hong, K. Capacity reliability of a road network, an assessment methodology and numerical results. Transp. Res. Part B 2002, 2, 225–252. [Google Scholar]
  31. Zhu, S.; Wang, W.; Deng, W. Research on traffic reliability and access road algorithm. China J. Highw. Transp. 2000, 13, 91–94. [Google Scholar]
  32. Chen, Y.; Du, H.; Liang, Y. Optimized Genetic Algorithm of Urban Road Network Unblocked Reliability. J. Beijing Univ. Technol. 2003, 29, 334–337. [Google Scholar]
  33. Pei, Y.; Gai, C. Study on Operation Reliability of Highway Network. J. Highw. Transp. Res. Dev. 2005, 22, 119–123. [Google Scholar]
  34. Zang, X. Reliability Research of Traffic Operation for Artery Network under snow Conditions. J. Transp. Syst. Eng. Inf. Technol. 2012, 12, 167–171, 177. [Google Scholar]
  35. Dong, C.; David, C.; Xue, Y. Multivariate random-parameters zero-inflated negative binomial regression model An application to estimate crash frequencies at intersections. Accid. Anal. Prev. 2014, 70, 320–329. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Xu, H. Research on the Traffic Conflict and Safety Evaluation of Freeway Typical Section. Master’s Thesis, Harbin Institute of Technology, Harbin, China, 2013. [Google Scholar]
  37. Zhou, M.; Wu, B.; Gai, S. Micro-simulation Research on the Influencing Factors of Capacity in Expressway Maintenance Work Area. Traffic Comput. 2004, 22, 54–57. [Google Scholar]
  38. Luo, S.; Zhou, W. Survey way of road-traffic-conflict technique. J. Chang’an Univ. (Nat. Sci. Ed.) 2003, 23, 71–75. [Google Scholar]
  39. Cheng, W. Research on the Theory Model and Method of Traffic Accidents and Traffic Conflict Technique in Urban Streets. Ph.D. Thesis, Jilin University, Changchun, China, 2004. [Google Scholar]
  40. Zheng, A.; Guo, J.; Niu, Z. Analysis of Traffic Confliction and the Influence Factors. J. Wuhan Univ. Sci. Technol. (Nat. Sci. Ed.) 2002, 25, 367–370. [Google Scholar]
  41. FHWA-IP-88-027. Traffic Conflict Techniques for Safety and Operation-Observers Manual; U.S. Department of Transportation: Washington, DC, USA, 1989.
  42. Luo, S. Research on Road Traffic Conflict. J. Highw. Transp. Res. Dev. 2001, 1, 65–68. [Google Scholar]
  43. Zhang, S. Research on China’s Traffic Conflict. Ph.D. Thesis, Southwest Jiaotong University, Chengdu, China, 1997. [Google Scholar]
  44. Erdong, C.; Andrew, P. Analysis of Crash Frequency in Work Zones with Focus on Police Enforcement. Transp. Res. Rec. 2012, 2280, 127–134. [Google Scholar]
  45. Wu, B. Driving Risk and Safety Control Strategy for Work Zones of Expressway. Ph.D. Thesis, Jilin University, Changchun, China, 2011. [Google Scholar]
  46. Cheng, H.; Lu, J. Traffic impact of highway accident based on VISSIM simulation. J. Chang’an Univ. (Nat. Sci. Ed.) 2015, 35, 226–229. [Google Scholar]
  47. Zhang, S.; Huang, F.; Meng, J. Analysis of driving risk of expressway work zone based on VISSIM. Road Constr. Mach. Constr. Mech. 2016, 6, 63–66, 70. [Google Scholar]
  48. Meng, X.; Zheng, L.; Bi, H. Research on Traffic Characteristics and Traffic Conflicts of One-way Closed Work Zone on Expressway. China J. Highw. Transp. 2013, 26, 140–146. [Google Scholar]
  49. Meng, X.; Xu, H.; Wang, H. Rear-end Conflict of Freeway Work Zone Based on TTC and DRAC. Traffic Inf. Saf. 2012, 30, 6–10. [Google Scholar]
  50. Jovanovic, D.; Backalic, T. The application of reliability models in traffic accident frequency analysis. Saf. Sci. 2011, 8, 1246–1251. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Backalic, S.; Jovanovic, D.; Backalic, T. Reliability reallocation models as a support tools in traffic safety analysis. Accid. Anal. Prev. 2014, 65, 47–52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Meng, X.; Qin, W.; Huo, X. Distribution characteristics of traffic crash data of freeway based on statistics and hypothesis test. J. Traffic Transp. Eng. 2018, 18, 139–149. [Google Scholar]
Figure 1. The relationship between work area length and traffic conflicts in a closed lane scene at 40 km/h.
Figure 1. The relationship between work area length and traffic conflicts in a closed lane scene at 40 km/h.
Sustainability 13 08744 g001
Figure 2. The relationship between work area length and traffic conflicts in a closed lane scene at 60 km/h.
Figure 2. The relationship between work area length and traffic conflicts in a closed lane scene at 60 km/h.
Sustainability 13 08744 g002
Figure 3. The relationship between work area length and traffic conflicts in a closed lane scene at 80 km/h.
Figure 3. The relationship between work area length and traffic conflicts in a closed lane scene at 80 km/h.
Sustainability 13 08744 g003
Figure 4. The relationship between work area length and traffic conflicts in a borrowed opposite lane scene at 40 km/h.
Figure 4. The relationship between work area length and traffic conflicts in a borrowed opposite lane scene at 40 km/h.
Sustainability 13 08744 g004
Figure 5. The relationship between work area length and traffic conflicts in a borrowed opposite lane scene at 60 km/h.
Figure 5. The relationship between work area length and traffic conflicts in a borrowed opposite lane scene at 60 km/h.
Sustainability 13 08744 g005
Figure 6. The relationship between work area length and traffic conflicts in a borrowed opposite lane scene at 80 km/h.
Figure 6. The relationship between work area length and traffic conflicts in a borrowed opposite lane scene at 80 km/h.
Sustainability 13 08744 g006
Figure 7. The relationship between work area length and traffic conflicts in a compressed lane scene at 40 km/h.
Figure 7. The relationship between work area length and traffic conflicts in a compressed lane scene at 40 km/h.
Sustainability 13 08744 g007
Figure 8. The relationship between work area length and traffic conflicts in a compressed lane scene at 60 km/h.
Figure 8. The relationship between work area length and traffic conflicts in a compressed lane scene at 60 km/h.
Sustainability 13 08744 g008
Figure 9. The relationship between work area length and traffic conflicts in a compressed lane scene at 80 km/h.
Figure 9. The relationship between work area length and traffic conflicts in a compressed lane scene at 80 km/h.
Sustainability 13 08744 g009
Figure 10. The relationship between the proportion of freight trucks and traffic conflicts in a closed lane scene at 40 km/h.
Figure 10. The relationship between the proportion of freight trucks and traffic conflicts in a closed lane scene at 40 km/h.
Sustainability 13 08744 g010
Figure 11. The relationship between the proportion of freight trucks and traffic conflicts in a closed lane scene at 60 km/h.
Figure 11. The relationship between the proportion of freight trucks and traffic conflicts in a closed lane scene at 60 km/h.
Sustainability 13 08744 g011
Figure 12. The relationship between the proportion of freight trucks and traffic conflicts in a closed lane scene at 80 km/h.
Figure 12. The relationship between the proportion of freight trucks and traffic conflicts in a closed lane scene at 80 km/h.
Sustainability 13 08744 g012
Figure 13. The relationship between the proportion of freight trucks and conflicts in a borrowed opposite lanes scene at 40 km/h.
Figure 13. The relationship between the proportion of freight trucks and conflicts in a borrowed opposite lanes scene at 40 km/h.
Sustainability 13 08744 g013
Figure 14. The relationship between the proportion of freight trucks and conflicts in a borrowed opposite lanes scene at 60 km/h.
Figure 14. The relationship between the proportion of freight trucks and conflicts in a borrowed opposite lanes scene at 60 km/h.
Sustainability 13 08744 g014
Figure 15. The relationship between the proportion of freight trucks and conflicts in a borrowed opposite lanes scene at 80 km/h.
Figure 15. The relationship between the proportion of freight trucks and conflicts in a borrowed opposite lanes scene at 80 km/h.
Sustainability 13 08744 g015
Figure 16. The relationship between the proportion of freight trucks and traffic conflicts in a compressed lane scene at 40 km/h.
Figure 16. The relationship between the proportion of freight trucks and traffic conflicts in a compressed lane scene at 40 km/h.
Sustainability 13 08744 g016
Figure 17. The relationship between the proportion of freight trucks and traffic conflicts in a compressed lane scene at 60 km/h.
Figure 17. The relationship between the proportion of freight trucks and traffic conflicts in a compressed lane scene at 60 km/h.
Sustainability 13 08744 g017
Figure 18. The relationship between the proportion of freight trucks and traffic conflicts in a compressed lane scene at 80 km/h.
Figure 18. The relationship between the proportion of freight trucks and traffic conflicts in a compressed lane scene at 80 km/h.
Sustainability 13 08744 g018
Figure 19. The relationship between traffic volume and traffic conflicts in a closed lane scene at 40 km/h.
Figure 19. The relationship between traffic volume and traffic conflicts in a closed lane scene at 40 km/h.
Sustainability 13 08744 g019
Figure 20. The relationship between traffic volume and traffic conflicts in a closed lane scene at 60 km/h.
Figure 20. The relationship between traffic volume and traffic conflicts in a closed lane scene at 60 km/h.
Sustainability 13 08744 g020
Figure 21. The relationship between traffic volume and traffic conflicts in a closed lane scene at 80 km/h.
Figure 21. The relationship between traffic volume and traffic conflicts in a closed lane scene at 80 km/h.
Sustainability 13 08744 g021
Figure 22. The relationship between traffic volume and traffic conflicts in a borrowed opposite lanes scene at 40 km/h.
Figure 22. The relationship between traffic volume and traffic conflicts in a borrowed opposite lanes scene at 40 km/h.
Sustainability 13 08744 g022
Figure 23. The relationship between traffic volume and traffic conflicts in a borrowed opposite lanes scene at 60 km/h.
Figure 23. The relationship between traffic volume and traffic conflicts in a borrowed opposite lanes scene at 60 km/h.
Sustainability 13 08744 g023
Figure 24. The relationship between traffic volume and traffic conflicts in a borrowed opposite lanes scene at 80 km/h.
Figure 24. The relationship between traffic volume and traffic conflicts in a borrowed opposite lanes scene at 80 km/h.
Sustainability 13 08744 g024
Figure 25. The relationship between traffic volume and traffic conflicts in a compressed lane scene at 40 km/h.
Figure 25. The relationship between traffic volume and traffic conflicts in a compressed lane scene at 40 km/h.
Sustainability 13 08744 g025
Figure 26. The relationship between traffic volume and traffic conflicts in a compressed lane scene at 60 km/h.
Figure 26. The relationship between traffic volume and traffic conflicts in a compressed lane scene at 60 km/h.
Sustainability 13 08744 g026
Figure 27. The relationship between traffic volume and traffic conflicts in a compressed lane scene at 80 km/h.
Figure 27. The relationship between traffic volume and traffic conflicts in a compressed lane scene at 80 km/h.
Sustainability 13 08744 g027
Table 1. Traffic volume (veh/h).
Table 1. Traffic volume (veh/h).
Level 1Level 2Level 3
1600 (3800)1800 (4000)2000 (4200)
The traffic volume outside the brackets refers to the input flow of closed lanes and opposite lanes, while the traffic volume inside the brackets refers to the input volume of the compressed lane.
Table 2. Traffic composition (Freight truck: Car: Bus).
Table 2. Traffic composition (Freight truck: Car: Bus).
Level 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5
0:0.9:0.10.1:0.8:0.10.2:0.7:0.10.3:0.6:0.10.4:0.5:0.1
Table 3. Work area length (km).
Table 3. Work area length (km).
Level 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5
0.51.05.010.015.0
Table 4. Speed limit setting (km/h).
Table 4. Speed limit setting (km/h).
Level 1Level 2Level 3
406080
Table 5. Desired speed setting under different speed limits.
Table 5. Desired speed setting under different speed limits.
LevelSpeed Limit (km/h)ModelV1V2
140car8040
bus8040
freight truck6040
260car8060
bus8060
freight truck6050
380car10080
bus9080
freight truck7070
V1 refers to expected speed at 1 km away from the advance warning area (km/h) and V2 refers to the expected speed at 1.4 km away from the advance warning area (km/h).
Table 6. Pearson test results of the closed lane scene.
Table 6. Pearson test results of the closed lane scene.
ConflictWork Area Length
ConflictPearson correlation10.053
Sig. (DT) 0.478
N180180
Table 7. Pearson test results of the borrowed opposite lane scene.
Table 7. Pearson test results of the borrowed opposite lane scene.
Work Area LengthConflict
Work area lengthPearson correlation10.043
Sig. (DT) 0.563
N180180
Table 8. Pearson test results of the compressed lane scene.
Table 8. Pearson test results of the compressed lane scene.
Work Area LengthConflict
Work area lengthPearson correlation10.026
Sig. (DT) 0.732
N180180
Table 9. Pearson correlation test results.
Table 9. Pearson correlation test results.
ConflictFreight Truck Ratio
ConflictPearson correlation10.387
Sig. (DT) 0.000
N540540
Table 10. Pearson correlation test results.
Table 10. Pearson correlation test results.
ConflictTraffic Volume
ConflictPearson correlation10.236
Sig. (DT) 0.000
N540540
Table 11. Spearman correlation test results.
Table 11. Spearman correlation test results.
ConflictTraffic Volume
ConflictCorrelation coefficient10.207
Sig. (DT) 0.000
N540540
Table 12. Pearson correlation test results.
Table 12. Pearson correlation test results.
ConflictTraffic Volume
ConflictPearson correlation1−0.105
Sig. (DT) 0.015
N540540
Table 13. The reliability calculation results.
Table 13. The reliability calculation results.
Activity Area LengthFreight Truck Ratio
00.10.20.30.4
0.50.9740.9610.9100.8730.805
10.9740.9600.9100.8740.806
50.9730.9530.8970.8710.799
100.9720.9490.8860.8640.794
150.9710.9430.8760.8570.771
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Ouyang, N. Comprehensive Operation Risk Assessment of a Highway Maintenance Area Based on Reliability. Sustainability 2021, 13, 8744. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13168744

AMA Style

Ouyang N. Comprehensive Operation Risk Assessment of a Highway Maintenance Area Based on Reliability. Sustainability. 2021; 13(16):8744. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13168744

Chicago/Turabian Style

Ouyang, Nan. 2021. "Comprehensive Operation Risk Assessment of a Highway Maintenance Area Based on Reliability" Sustainability 13, no. 16: 8744. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13168744

APA Style

Ouyang, N. (2021). Comprehensive Operation Risk Assessment of a Highway Maintenance Area Based on Reliability. Sustainability, 13(16), 8744. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13168744

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop