Critical Success Factors to Improve the Business Performance of Tea Drink Chains
Abstract
:1. Introduction
2. Literature Review
2.1. Chain Business Model
2.2. Business Performance
2.3. Critical Success Factors
3. Methodology
3.1. Delphi Technique
3.2. Instruments
3.3. Content Design of Questionnaire
3.4. Research Implementation
3.4.1. Establishment of Expert Content Validity
3.4.2. Implementation of Delphi Survey
- (1)
- Develop a Delphi questionnaire based on the expert content validity review questionnaire.
- (2)
- Select experts in the field to become Delphi experts.
- (3)
- Consult by telephone and determine the list of Delphi experts.
- (4)
- Send the first Delphi questionnaire letters and the first Delphi questionnaires.
- (5)
- Recover the first Delphi questionnaires, analyze the mode (Mo), mean (M), and standard deviation (SD) of each question, and modify the questionnaire into the second Delphi questionnaire.
- (6)
- Send the second Delphi questionnaire letters and second Delphi questionnaires.
- (7)
- Recover the second Delphi questionnaires, analyze the Mo, M, and SD of each question, and modify the questionnaire into the third Delphi questionnaire.
- (8)
- Send the third Delphi questionnaire letters and the third Delphi questionnaires.
- (9)
- Recover the third Delphi questionnaires and analyze the Mo, M, SD, and expert consistency of each question.
3.4.3. Data Processing
4. Results
Test the Statistics
- (1)
- For the sub-item of the quality certification of raw materials purchased and the guarantee of food safety, the average mean was 5, the mode was 5, and the standard deviation was 0. This shows that all of the professionals believed that this item is very significant.
- (2)
- For the sub-item of the recognition of the brand logo, the average mean was 4.83, the mode was 5, and the standard deviation was 0.37. This means that 84% of the professionals believed that this item is very significant and 16% believed it is significant.
- (3)
- For the sub-item of the differentiation and advantages of brand, the average mean was 4.83, the mode was 5, and the standard deviation was 0.37. Thus, 84% of the professionals believed that this item is very significant and 16% believed it is significant.
- (4)
- For the sub-item of maintaining the cleanliness and hygiene of the store at all times, the average mean was 4.83, the mode was 5, and the standard deviation was 0.37. This implies that 84% of the professionals believed that this item is very significant and 16% believed it is significant.
- (5)
- For the sub-item of service attitude and the affinity of staff, the average mean was 4.75, the mode was 5, and the standard deviation was 0.43. This denotes that 75% of the professionals believed that this item is very significant and 25% believed it is significant.
- (6)
- For the sub-item of the taste and uniqueness of drinks, the average mean was 4.67, the mode was 5, and the standard deviation was 0.47. Thus, 67% of the professionals believed that this item is very significant and 33% believed it is significant.
- (7)
- For the sub-item of the stability and timeliness of raw material suppliers, the average mean was 4.67, the mode was 5, and the standard deviation was 0.47. We saw that 67% of the professionals believed that this item is very significant and 33% believed it is significant.
- (8)
- For the sub-item of the dress, appearance, and cleanliness of staff, the average mean was 4.67, the mode was 5, and the standard deviation was 0.47. This shows that 67% of the professionals believed that this item is very significant and 33% believed it is significant.
- (9)
- For the sub-item of the professional training of staff, the average mean was 4.58, the mode was 5, and the standard deviation was 0.49. This means that 42% of the professionals believed that this item is very significant and 58% believed it is significant.
- (10)
- For the sub-item of store design and decoration appearance, the average mean was 4.5, the mode was 5(4), and the standard deviation was 0.5. This denotes that 50% of the professionals believed that this item is very significant and 50% believed it is significant.
- (11)
- For the sub-item of SOP planning and the implementation of the production flow, the average mean was 4.5, the mode was 5(4), and the standard deviation was 0.5. Therefore, 50% of the professionals believed that this item is very significant and 50% believed it is significant.
- (12)
- For the sub-item of the expenses of food safety inspections, staff education and training, the average mean was 4.5, the mode was 5(4), and the standard deviation was 0.5. We saw that 50% of the professionals believed that this item is very significant and 50% believed it is significant.
- (13)
- For the sub-item of the direct material costs including tea, sugar, creamer, and milk, the average mean was 4.42, the mode was 4, and the standard deviation was 0.49. Overall, 42% of the professionals believed that this item is very significant and 58% believed it is significant.
- (14)
- For the sub-item of direct labor costs that include the production of tea drinks and salaries of counter attendants, the average mean was 4.33, the mode was 4, and the standard deviation was 0.47. This implies that 33% of the professionals believed that this item is very significant and 67% believed it is significant.
- (15)
- For the sub-item of new product launch promotions and tasting activities, the average mean was 4.33, the mode was 4, and the standard deviation was 0.47. This means that 33% of the professionals believed that this item is very significant and 67% believed it is significant.
- (16)
- For the sub-item of the irregular launch of new seasonal products, the average mean was 4.33, the mode was 4, and the standard deviation was 0.47. We saw that 33% of the professionals believed that this item is very significant and 67% believed it is significant.
- (17)
- For the sub-item of the turnover rate of staff, the average mean was 4.25, the mode was 4, and the standard deviation was 0.43. Overall, 25% of the professionals believed that this item is very significant and 75% believed it is significant.
- (18)
- For the sub-item of the choice of investment in self-operated stores and franchise stores, the average mean was 4.25, the mode was 4, and the standard deviation was 0.43. Therefore, 25% of the professionals believed that this item is very significant and 75% believed it is significant.
5. Discussions
6. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Conflicts of Interest
Appendix A. Items of Critical Success Factors
I. CSFs for Brand Image Management: 12 Sub-items |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
II. CSFs of Quality and Cost Control: 12 Sub-items |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
III. CSFs of Location of Business: 8 Sub-items |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
IV. CSFs of Personnel training and Customer Satisfaction: 9 Sub-items |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
V. CSFs of Marketing Mode and Promotion Mode: 9 Sub-items |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
References
- Ma, Y.F. The impact of Perceived Organizational Support on Franchisee Satisfaction and Contract Termination Intentions: The Mediating Role of Perceived Insider Status. Master’s Thesis, Tunghai University, Taiwan, 2012. [Google Scholar]
- Qiu, R.T. Study on the Business Strategy of Take-Out Chain Beverage Industry-Taking Dayuanzi as an Example. Master’s Thesis, Tunghai University, Taiwan, 2015. [Google Scholar]
- Bustinza, O.F.; Parry, G.C.; Vendrell-Herrero, F. Supply and demand chain management: The effect of adding services to product offerings. Supply Chain Manag. 2013, 18, 618–629. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bender, K.W. Process innovation-Case study of critical success factors. Eng. Manag. J. 2000, 12, 17–24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Brotherton, B. Critical success factors in UK budget hotel operations. Int. J. Oper. Prod. Manag. 2004, 24, 944–969. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Marais, M.; Plessis, E.; Saayman, M. A review on critical success factors in tourism. J. Hosp. Tour. Manag. 2017, 31, 1–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zeng, Y.Y. Drank tens of billions of business opportunities: Taiwan’s hand-cranked tea drinks to enter the world. Watch. Mag. 2015, 6, 36. [Google Scholar]
- Dora, M.; Kumar, M.; Van Goubergen, D.; Molnar, A.; Gellynck, X. Operational performance and critical success factors of lean manufacturing in European food processing SMEs. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 2013, 31, 156–164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Long, T.B.; Looijen, A.; Blok, V. Critical success factors for the transition to business models for sustainability in the food and beverage industry in the Netherlands. J. Clean. Prod. 2018, 175, 82–95. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Wu, Q.S.; Lin, T.Y. Virtuousness. Taiwan Educ. Res. Mon. 2001, 92, 127. [Google Scholar]
- IIBA (International Institute of Business Analysis). A Guide to the Business Analysis Body of Knowledge; International Institute of Business Analysis: Pickering, ON, Canada, 2015; Available online: https://cs.anu.edu.au/courses/comp3120/public_docs/BOKV1_6.pdf (accessed on 12 June 2021).
- Petrillo, A.; DiBona, G.; Forcina, A.; Silvestri, A. Building excellence through the agile reengineering performance model (ARPM): A strategic business model for organizations. Bus. Process Manag. J. 2018, 24, 128–157. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lee, C.W.; Liao, C.S. The effects of consumer preferences and perceptions of Chinese tea beverages on brand positioning strategies. Br. Food J. 2009, 111, 80–96. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, P. Mine water problems and solutions in China. Mine Water Environ. 2018, 37, 217–221. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, Z.R.; Marjerison, R.K. Factors influencing consumers’ purchase intentions towards made-to-order tea drinks in China. Int. J. Food Beverage Manuf. Bus. Models 2019, 4, 29–52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Kaplinsky, R.; Morris, M. Thinning and thickening: Productive sector policies in the era of global value chains. Eur. J. Dev. Res. 2016, 28, 625–645. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bair, J.; Gereffi, G. Upgrading, uneven development, and jobs in the North American apparel industry. Glob. Netw. 2003, 3, 143–169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chen, C.M.; Lin, F.J.; Wu, P.C. Research on the key success factors affecting the stable development of organic agriculture in Yilan County. Agric. Econ. Ser. 2018, 24, 31–60. [Google Scholar]
- Huang, Y.F.; Lee, S.S.; Tsai, H.J.; Chang, T.C. A study of relationship among product information disclosure, brand equity and cause-related marketing: A case of takeout beverage chain and franchises industry. Chaoyang Commer. Manag. Rev. 2013, 12, 65–90. [Google Scholar]
- Zott, C.; Amit, R. Business model design: An activity system perspective. Long Range Plan. 2010, 43, 216–226. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Teece, D.J. Explicating dynamic capabilities: The nature and microfoundations of (sustainable) enterprise performance. Strateg. Manag. J. 2007, 28, 1319–1350. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Zott, C.; Amit, R.; Massa, L. The business model: Recent developments and future research. J. Manag. 2011, 37, 1019–1042. [Google Scholar]
- Benson-Rea, M.; Brodie, R.J.; Sima, H. The plurality of co-existing business models: Investigating the complexity of value drivers. Ind. Mark. Manag. 2013, 42, 717–729. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Huemer, L. Unchained from the chain: Drink management from a logistics service provider perspective. J. Bus. Res. 2012, 65, 258–264. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Trkman, P.; Budler, M.; Groznik, A. A business model approach to drink chain management. Drink Chain Manag. 2015, 20, 587–602. [Google Scholar]
- Hwang, J.; Christensen, C.M. Disruptive innovation in health care delivery: A framework for business-model innovation. Health Aff. 2008, 27, 1329–1335. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kamal, M.M.; Irani, Z. Analysing drink chain integration through a systematic literature review: A normative perspective. Drink Chain Manag. 2014, 19, 523–557. [Google Scholar]
- Wiengarten, F.; Longoni, A. A nuanced view on drink chain integration: A coordinative and collaborative approach to operational and sustainability performance improvement. Drink Chain Manag. 2015, 20, 139–150. [Google Scholar]
- Sun, Y.; Gong, Y.; Zhang, Y.; Jia, F.; Shi, Y. User-driven drink chain business model innovation: The role of dynamic capabilities. Corp. Soc. Responsib. Environ. Manag. 2021, 28, 1157–1170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ariyachandra, T.R.; Frolick, M.N. Critical success factors in business performance management-striving for success. Inf. Syst. Manag. 2008, 25, 113–120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Eckerson, W. Performance Dashboards: Measuring, Monitoring and Managing Your Business; John Wiley & Sons: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2010. [Google Scholar]
- Boynton, A.C.; Robert, W.Z. An assessment of critical success factors. Sloan Manag. Rev. 1984, 25, 17–27. [Google Scholar]
- Mohan, S. Value Chain Upgrading for Competitiveness and Sustainability: A Comparative Study of Tea Value Chains in Kenya, Sri Lanka and Nepal; International Centre for Trade and Sustainable Development (ICTSD): Geneva, Switzerland, 2018; Available online: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/323425108_Value_Chain_Upgrading_for_Competitiveness_and_Sustainability_A_Comparative_Study_of_Tea_Value_Chains_in_Kenya_Sri_Lanka_and_Nepal (accessed on 20 July 2021).
- Reich, B.H.; Benbasat, I. Factors that influence the social dimension of alignment between business and information technology objectives. MIS Q. 2000, 24, 81–113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Khan, M.A.; Salah, K. IoT security: Review, blockchain solutions, and open challenges. Future Gener. Comput. Syst. 2018, 82, 395–411. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kukard, W.; Wood, L. Consumers’ perceptions of item-level RFID use in FMCG: A balanced perspective of benefits and risks. J. Glob. Inf. Manag. 2017, 25, 21–42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zani, W. The Computer Utility. Calif. Manag. Rev. 1970, 13, 31–37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tran, T.M.T.; Yuen, K.F.; Li, K.X.; Balci, G.; Ma, F. A theory-driven identification and ranking of the critical success factors of sustainable shipping anagement. J. Clean. Prod. 2020, 243, 118401. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Maier, F.; Meyer, M. Social impact bonds and the perils of aligned interests. Adm. Sci. 2017, 7, 24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Carè, R.; Rania, F.; De Lisa, R. Critical success factors, motivations, and risks in social impact bonds. Sustainability 2020, 12, 7291. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Abdel-Fattah, M.A. A model to evaluate the benefits of applying BPR methodology. Int. J. Adv. Res. Comput. Sci. Softw. Eng. 2015, 5, 101–107. [Google Scholar]
- Chiu, C.T. Advanced education and mortality compression in the United States. EurAmerica 2017, 47, 143–175. [Google Scholar]
- Delbecq, A.L. Group Techniques for Program Planning: A Guide to Nominal Group and Delphi Processes; Scott, Foresman and Company: Upper Saddle River, NJ, USA, 1975. [Google Scholar]
- Woudenberg, F. An evaluation of Delphi. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Chang. 1991, 40, 131–150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Murry, J.W.; Hammons, J.O. Delphi: A versatile methodology for conducting qualitative research. Rev. High. Educ. 1995, 18, 423–436. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lei, J.; Huang, W.Y. Pragmatic professionalism: A fuzzy Delphi study on the competencies of social workers in Guangzhou, China. Br. J. Soc. Work 2018, 48, 505–524. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lai, K.W. The role of value satisfaction and commitment in the impact of service quality on customer loyalty in Hong Kong-style tea restaurants. Cornell Hotel Q. 2015, 56, 118–138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sean, S. Predictive indicators of relationship quality and loyalty in the chain restaurant industry. Cornell Hotel Q. 2010, 51, 251–267. [Google Scholar]
- Lester, D.H. Critical success factors for new product development. Res. Technol. Manag. 2016, 41, 36–43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chen, Z.S. An Empirical Research of Key Success Factors for the Chain Tea-Drinking Store. Master’s Thesis, National Cheng Kung University, Taiwan, 2011. [Google Scholar]
- Lin, C.T.; Hung, K.P.; Hu, S.H. A decision-making model for evaluating and selecting suppliers for the sustainable operation and development of enterprises in the aerospace industry. Sustainability 2018, 10, 735. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Dutt, A.; Tan, M.; Alagumalai, S.; Nair, R. Development and validation of the ability in behavior assessment and interventions for teachers using Delphi technique and Rasch analysis. J. Autism Dev. Disord. 2019, 49, 1976–1987. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Tseng, M.L.; Lin, C.W.R.; Sujanto, R.Y.; Lim, M.K.; Bui, T.D. Assessing sustainable consumption in packaged food in Indonesia: Corporate communication drives consumer perception and behavior. Sustainability 2021, 13, 8021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Falcone, D.; Di Bona, G.; Silvestri, A.; Forcina, A.; Belfiore, G.; Petrillo, A. An integrated model for an advanced production process- gile Re-engineering Project Management. IFAC-Pap. Online 2018, 51, 1630–1635. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Arli, D.; Bauer, C.; Palmatier, R.W. Relational selling: Past, present and future. Ind. Mark. Manag. 2018, 69, 169–184. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Christopher, M.; Holweg, M. Drink chain 2.0: Managing drink chains in the era of turbulence. Int. J. Phys. Distrib. Logist. Manag. 2011, 41, 63–82. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lin, K.; Xiong, L. Social embedding, pyramid bottom strategy and agricultural product business model construction-Taking local enterprise company as an example. Manag. Case Stud. Rev. 2016, 9, 444–456. [Google Scholar]
- Gong, Y.; Jia, F.; Brown, S.; Koh, L. Drink chain learning of sustainability in multi-tier drink chains: A resource orchestration perspective. Int. J. Oper. Prod. Manag. 2018, 38, 1061–1090. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
Number (N) | 12 |
---|---|
Kendall’s W test | 0.266 |
Chi-square | 92.633 |
Degree of freedom | 29 |
Asymptotic significance | 0.000 |
No. | Item | M | Mo | SD | K–S Z-Test | Choice |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
I. Factors of Brand Image Management | ||||||
1–1 | Store design and decoration appearance | 4.5 | 5(4) | 0.50 | 1.732 ** | Keep |
1–2 | Advertisement and media publicity | 4.08 | 4 | 0.62 | 1.155 | Delete |
1–3 | Story of brand management | 4.42 | 5 | 0.63 | 1.732 ** | Delete |
1–4 | Recognition of brand logo | 4.83 | 5 | 0.37 | 2.887 ** | Keep |
1–6 | Theory and mission of brand | 4.25 | 5 | 0.61 | 1.155 | Delete |
1–7 | Differentiation and advantages of brand | 4.83 | 5 | 0.37 | 2.887 ** | Keep |
1–8 | Characteristics and spirit of brand | 4.42 | 5 | 0.63 | 1.732 ** | Delete |
1–9 | Quality certifications of raw materials purchased and guarantee of food safety | 5 | 5 | 0.00 | 2.887 ** | |
1–10 | Taste and uniqueness of drinks | 4.67 | 5 | 0.47 | 2.309 ** | |
1–12 | Choice between investment in self-operated stores and franchise stores | 4.25 | 4 | 0.43 | 2.598 ** | Keep |
II. Factors of Quality and Cost Control | ||||||
2–1 | Direct material costs include tea, sugar, creamer, milk, etc. | 4.42 | 4 | 0.49 | 2.021 ** | Keep |
2–2 | Direct labor costs include production of tea drinks and salary of the counter attendants | 4.33 | 4 | 0.47 | 2.309 ** | Keep |
2–3 | Indirect costs include rent, insurance, and depreciation | 4.08 | 4 | 0.62 | 1.155 | Delete |
2–5 | Costs include water purification and refrigeration equipment, POS equipment, tea-making equipment, sealing machines, etc. | 3.83 | 4 | 0.36 | 2.309 ** | Delete |
2–9 | Expenses of food safety inspection and staff education and training | 4.5 | 5(4) | 0.50 | 1.732 ** | Keep |
2–10 | Stability and timeliness of raw material suppliers | 4.67 | 5 | 0.47 | 2.309 ** | Keep |
2–11 | SOP planning and implementation of the production flow | 4.5 | 5 | 0.50 | 1.732 ** | Keep |
2–12 | Competitiveness with peers | 4.42 | 5(4) | 0.63 | 1.732 ** | Delete |
III. Factors of Location of Business | ||||||
3–9 | Visibility of the location of business | Qualitative Research | Opinions of Professors | |||
3–10 | Convergence of people flow | Qualitative Research | Opinions of Professors | |||
3–11 | Structural consumption characteristics of the population in the area | Qualitative Research | Opinions of Professors | |||
(The 3 items above are the supplementary items of the in-depth interview with professors [19]) | ||||||
IV. Factors of Personnel Training and Customer Satisfaction | ||||||
4–1 | Professional training of staff | 4.58 | 5 | 0.49 | 2.021 ** | Keep |
4–2 | Dress, appearance, and cleanliness of staff | 4.67 | 5 | 0.47 | 2.309 ** | Keep |
4–3 | Service attitude and affinity of staff | 4.75 | 5 | 0.43 | 2.887 ** | Keep |
4–5 | Strengthen the empathy of service quality | 4.58 | 5 | 0.63 | 2.309 ** | Delete |
4–7 | Maintain the cleanliness and hygiene of store at all times | 4.83 | 5 | 0.37 | 2.887 ** | Keep |
4–8 | Turnover rate of staff | 4.25 | 4 | 0.43 | 2.598 ** | Keep |
4–9 | Meeting customer needs and customization | 4.17 | 4 | 0.66 | 1.155 | Delete |
V. Factors of Marking Mode and Promotion Mode | ||||||
5–1 | New product launch promotion and tasting activities | 4.33 | 4 | 0.47 | 2.309 ** | Keep |
5–2 | Irregular launch of new seasonal products | 4.33 | 4 | 0.47 | 2.309 ** | Keep |
Priority | Item | M | Mo | SD | Z-Test |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 1–9 Quality certifications of raw materials purchased and guarantee of food safety | 5 | 5 | 0.00 | 2.887 ** |
2 | 1–4 Recognition of brand logo | 4.83 | 5 | 0.37 | 2.887 ** |
3 | 1–7 Differentiation and advantages of brand | 4.83 | 5 | 0.37 | 2.887 ** |
4 | 4–7 Maintain the cleanliness and hygiene of store at all times | 4.83 | 5 | 0.37 | 2.887 ** |
5 | 4–3 Service attitude and affinity of staff | 4.75 | 5 | 0.43 | 2.887 ** |
6 | 1–10 Taste and uniqueness of drinks | 4.67 | 5 | 0.47 | 2.309 ** |
7 | 2–10 Stability and timeliness of raw material suppliers | 4.67 | 5 | 0.47 | 2.309 ** |
8 | 4–2 Dress, appearance, and cleanliness of staff | 4.67 | 5 | 0.47 | 2.309 ** |
9 | 4–1 Professional training of staff | 4.58 | 5 | 0.49 | 2.021 ** |
10 | 1–1 Store design and decoration appearance | 4.5 | 5(4) | 0.50 | 1.732 ** |
11 | 2–11 SOP planning and implementation of the production flow | 4.5 | 5(4) | 0.50 | 1.732 ** |
12 | 2–9 Expenses of food safety inspection, staff education, and training | 4.5 | 5(4) | 0.50 | 1.732 ** |
13 | 2–1 Direct material costs include tea, sugar, creamer, milk, etc. | 4.42 | 4 | 0.49 | 2.021 ** |
14 | 2–2 Direct labor costs include production of tea drinks and salary of the counter attendants | 4.33 | 4 | 0.47 | 2.309 ** |
15 | 5–1 New product launch promotion and tasting activities | 4.33 | 4 | 0.47 | 2.309 ** |
16 | 5–2 Irregular launch of new seasonal products | 4.33 | 4 | 0.47 | 2.309 ** |
17 | 4–8 Turnover rate of staff | 4.25 | 4 | 0.43 | 2.598 ** |
18 | 1–12 Choice between investment in self-operated stores and franchise stores | 4.25 | 4 | 0.43 | 2.598 ** |
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. |
© 2021 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Chen, D.-C.; Chen, D.-F.; Huang, S.-M.; Huang, M.-J.; Shyr, W.-J.; Chiou, C.-F. Critical Success Factors to Improve the Business Performance of Tea Drink Chains. Sustainability 2021, 13, 8953. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13168953
Chen D-C, Chen D-F, Huang S-M, Huang M-J, Shyr W-J, Chiou C-F. Critical Success Factors to Improve the Business Performance of Tea Drink Chains. Sustainability. 2021; 13(16):8953. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13168953
Chicago/Turabian StyleChen, Dyi-Cheng, Der-Fa Chen, Shih-Ming Huang, Mu-Jung Huang, Wen-Jye Shyr, and Chien-Fu Chiou. 2021. "Critical Success Factors to Improve the Business Performance of Tea Drink Chains" Sustainability 13, no. 16: 8953. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13168953
APA StyleChen, D. -C., Chen, D. -F., Huang, S. -M., Huang, M. -J., Shyr, W. -J., & Chiou, C. -F. (2021). Critical Success Factors to Improve the Business Performance of Tea Drink Chains. Sustainability, 13(16), 8953. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13168953