Next Article in Journal
Feminization of African Agriculture and the Meaning of Decision-Making for Empowerment and Sustainability
Previous Article in Journal
Improving Horse Welfare and Environmental Sustainability in Horse Husbandry: Linkage between Turnout and Nitrogen Surplus
 
 
Article
Peer-Review Record

Managing the Volatility Risk of Renewable Energy: Index Insurance for Offshore Wind Farms in Taiwan

Sustainability 2021, 13(16), 8985; https://doi.org/10.3390/su13168985
by Shih-Chieh Liao 1,*, Shih-Chieh Chang 1 and Tsung-Chi Cheng 2
Reviewer 1:
Reviewer 2: Anonymous
Reviewer 3: Anonymous
Sustainability 2021, 13(16), 8985; https://doi.org/10.3390/su13168985
Submission received: 3 July 2021 / Revised: 5 August 2021 / Accepted: 9 August 2021 / Published: 11 August 2021
(This article belongs to the Section Energy Sustainability)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

The resolution of the images must be improved. Please check the attached reviewed PDF for my reviewer comments and suggested changes. Thank you!

Comments for author File: Comments.pdf

Author Response

Please see the attachments.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 2 Report

This is not scientific paper but technical report pasted in the form of paper. The literature review is missing to present the problem and to form theoretical background for this study. There are many papers in this field. What is novelty and input in comparison of other studies. Where is no discussion and comparison of results with other studies in this field. The policy implications are necessary and limits of conducted research. Future reasearch guidelines should be clearly formulated.

Author Response

Please see the attachments.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 3 Report

 However introduction is extended, references of other similar papers or other models of forecasting are not described. Figure 2-7 are not clearly presented (units and axis). A comparison with similar projects may stress the novelty of this paper.  A paragraph which summarizes the differences with similar projects may help to stress the novelty of this approach.

Author Response

Please see the attachments.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Round 2

Reviewer 2 Report

The authors did good job and corrected their paper. The revised version of paper can be accepted in current form as authors have taken into account my all comments and revised paper accordingly. The answers are also ok.

Back to TopTop