Next Article in Journal
A Review of Circular Economy Research for Electric Motors and the Role of Industry 4.0 Technologies
Previous Article in Journal
The Impact of an Enterprise’s Intellectualization on Its Leadership Potential
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Interweaving Industrial Ecology and Ecological Modernization: A Comparative Bibliometric Analysis

1
Institute of Science and Technology for Development of Shandong, Qilu University of Technology (Shandong Academy of Sciences), Jinan 250100, China
2
Information Research Institute of Shandong Academy of Sciences, Qilu University of Technology (Shandong Academy of Sciences), Jinan 250100, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Sustainability 2021, 13(17), 9673; https://doi.org/10.3390/su13179673
Submission received: 29 June 2021 / Revised: 4 August 2021 / Accepted: 21 August 2021 / Published: 27 August 2021

Abstract

Although industrial activity has brought about rapid economic growth, it also faces the dual challenges of resource constraints and environmental pressure. Industrial ecology (IE) and ecological modernization (EM) are two theories regarding the conceptualization and implementation of sustainable development that emerged from the natural and social sciences, respectively. Over the past three decades, scholars have conducted copious amounts of theoretical and applied research on IE and EM, but comparative studies from an interdisciplinary perspective on the relationship between the two remain relatively rare. On the basis of a bibliometric analysis, this study offers a comprehensive examination of the background, theoretical connotations, and main content of IE and EM, also exploring the role of both theoretical perspectives in the promotion of sustainable industrial development. The findings are fourfold: (1) the research on IE and EM has been increasing year by year, particularly in the past decade; (2) the research is mostly concentrated in developed countries such as the United States and European Union member nations, and contributions from China have increased significantly in recent years; (3) IE has a broader research community than EM and has evolved clearer and more specific research contents and methods; and (4) IE, which analyzes the problems of specific industrial systems, and EM, which constitutes a higher-level institutional policy design, exhibit a trend of cross-fertilization. This study provides a reference for building a more systematic and comprehensive theoretical system of ecological transformation and discusses the future research directions in this field.
Keywords: industrial ecology; ecological modernization; green transformation; comparative analysis; bibliometric analysis industrial ecology; ecological modernization; green transformation; comparative analysis; bibliometric analysis

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Han, F.; Feng, Z.; Wang, C.; Yang, N.; Yang, D.; Shi, F. Interweaving Industrial Ecology and Ecological Modernization: A Comparative Bibliometric Analysis. Sustainability 2021, 13, 9673. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13179673

AMA Style

Han F, Feng Z, Wang C, Yang N, Yang D, Shi F. Interweaving Industrial Ecology and Ecological Modernization: A Comparative Bibliometric Analysis. Sustainability. 2021; 13(17):9673. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13179673

Chicago/Turabian Style

Han, Feng, Zhangcong Feng, Chao Wang, Nujie Yang, Dong Yang, and Feng Shi. 2021. "Interweaving Industrial Ecology and Ecological Modernization: A Comparative Bibliometric Analysis" Sustainability 13, no. 17: 9673. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13179673

APA Style

Han, F., Feng, Z., Wang, C., Yang, N., Yang, D., & Shi, F. (2021). Interweaving Industrial Ecology and Ecological Modernization: A Comparative Bibliometric Analysis. Sustainability, 13(17), 9673. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13179673

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop