Next Article in Journal
Impact Assessment in Not-for-Profit Organizations: The Case of a Foundation for the Development of the Territory
Previous Article in Journal
Twalk Your Talk: On the (Non)-Formative Influence of Corporate Social Responsibility Communication on Supply Chain Sustainability Measures
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Distribution and Influence on the Microbial Ecological Relationship of Antibiotic Resistance Genes in Soil at a Watershed Scale

1
College of Life Sciences, Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University, Fuzhou 350002, China
2
CAS Engineering Laboratory for Recycling Technology of Municipal Solid Waste, CAS Key Lab of Urban Environment and Health, Institute of Urban Environment, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Xiamen 361021, China
3
Graduate School of University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China
4
Zhejiang Key Lab of Urban Environmental Processes and Pollution Control, Ningbo Urban Environmental Observatory and Research Station, Institute of Urban Environment, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Ningbo 315830, China
5
School of Water Resources and Environment, China University of Geosciences, Beijing 100083, China
6
Key Laboratory of Health Risk Factors for Seafood of Zhejiang Province, Zhoushan Municipal Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Zhoushan 316021, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Sustainability 2021, 13(17), 9748; https://doi.org/10.3390/su13179748
Submission received: 26 July 2021 / Revised: 18 August 2021 / Accepted: 24 August 2021 / Published: 30 August 2021

Abstract

:
Antibiotic resistance genes (ARGs) are ubiquitous in the environment, with previous studies mainly focusing on the terrestrial ecosystem, which is prone to higher antibiotic application. However, the characteristics, distribution pattern, and driving factors of soil ARGs at the macro scale are still unclear. In this study, the soil ARGs, antibiotics, mobile genetic elements (MGEs), soil properties, toxic metals, polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs), and bacterial community in the Taipu River Basin were analyzed to investigate the distribution and dissemination of ARGs at a watershed scale. The results revealed that ARGs were widespread in the soils along the Taipu River, and that ARG profiles varied greatly with different types of land use, but showed regional similarities. The characteristics were mainly determined by antibiotic input and the ARG transmission mediated by MGEs. The order of the contribution of environmental factors to ARG distribution was toxic metals > PAHs > soil properties. Toxic metal pollution was coupled with ARGs through MGE mediation, while PAHs and soil properties were most likely to affect the ARG distribution by shifting the bacterial community. The microbial–ecological relationship changed significantly with the enrichment of ARGs, and its impact may extend to the watershed scale. Transposon IS1247 can be used as an indicator of the ARGs impact on the microbial ecological relationship in the soils of the Taipu River Basin.

1. Introduction

Antibiotic resistance genes (ARGs) are emerging pollutants [1]. China is facing serious ARG pollution [2]. Traces of ARGs have been found in the main water bodies of China, including the Yangtze River, the Yellow River, the Haihe River, and the Pearl River [3,4,5,6], indicating the widespread ARG pollution caused by intensive human activities along these rivers at a macro scale. However, while most of the macroscopic studies on the distribution of ARGs were focused on water bodies and sediments [7,8], it is still unknown whether there is a macro scale migration and transformation of ARGs in the riverside soil.
Soil acts as a natural ARG reservoir, and is also vulnerable to contamination [9]. Various studies have reported the presence of soil ARGs in places with massive antibiotic application, such as pastures, aquafarms, hospital settings [10], sewage treatment plants [11,12,13], landfills, and farmland which received long-term manure/sludge application [14,15,16]. Recent studies demonstrated the accumulation of ARGs in places without antibiotic usages, such as an urban park [17], which indicates the widespread distribution of ARGs in the soil. Moreover, unlike traditional pollutants, ARGs can either self-amplify or transfer to different microbial hosts through mobile genetic elements [18]. The propagation of ARGs is affected by the selection of antibiotics [19] and by environmental factors, such as temperature, pH, precipitation, and soil organic matter [20,21]. In addition, ARGs are always coupled with some pollutants during the transmission; for instance, there might be a mechanism of co-selection of ARGs and toxic metal resistance genes (HRGs) in bacterial strains [22]. It has been found that the transfer frequency of ARGs will accelerate under certain heavy metal contents [23]. The coupling relationship between ARGs and environmental factors or pollutants indicates the possibility of a large-scale migration of ARGs. Watershed is the most ideal spatial scale for macro scale research on resistance genes because the spatial pattern of pollutants at this scale is affected by multiple factors such as the natural environment, land use, and human disturbance. Hence, it is necessary to break through the limitations of previous research projects and explore the ARG pollution of riverside soils at a watershed scale.
The enrichment of antibiotic inhibited microbial biodiversity and functional stability [24,25] explored in another experiment showed that antibiotics only temporarily affect the bacterial community structure [26]. ARGs are considered as indicators of the impact of antibiotics on microorganisms [27,28]. However, the influence of ARGs on microbial communities has been ignored. As mentioned above, ARGs are the means of a microbial ecological adaption under a selection pressure of antibiotics, but they can be transferred among microbial communities and are more susceptible to environmental factors than microorganisms [29]. Whether the ARG pollution breaks away from the limitation of the geographical distribution of the bacterial community, and in turn affects the ecological relationship of the microorganisms at a macro scale is a new perspective for understanding ARG pollution.
The Yangtze River Delta is the region with the highest population density and urbanization level, and also has a high risk of ARG contamination due to intensive human activities. To date, ARGs have been detected in Taihu Lake [30], Huangpu River, and other water bodies in the Delta area [31]. However, studies on soil resistome and risks along the Yangtze riverside at the watershed scale are still lacking. As a young artificial river in the Yangtze River Delta, the existence of the Taipu River coincides with the urbanization development of the Yangtze River Delta. There are a variety of typical antibiotic pollution sources and other pollution sources along this river, which can fully demonstrate the impact of human activities on the existence of ARGs. Therefore, the Taipu River was selected in this study as the representative area for the Yangtze River Delta.
The study comprehensively investigated soil ARGs along Taipu River at the watershed scale. Research objectives of this study are to explore: (1) the spatial distribution of soil ARGs on the macro scale, (2) the driving factors of ARG spatial distribution, and (3) the degree to which the enrichment and transmission of ARGs will have effects on the ecological relationship between microorganisms at a watershed scale.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Site Description and Sample Collection

The Taipu River (E 120°29′~121°4.5′, N 31°0′~31°1.67′), named after the connection between Taihu Lake and Huangpu River, has a total length of 57.6 km and passes through 15 districts in Jiangsu Province, Zhejiang Province, and Shanghai City (Figure 1). It is the largest artificial river in the Taihu Lake Basin. The Taipu River Basin belongs to the plain river network, along which there are textile printing and dyeing areas, industrial areas, farmland areas, aquafarms, and residential areas. A total of 15 sets of sampling sites along the Taipu River at 3 km intervals were sampled, with a total of 45 samples collected, with three replicates for each sample. The land use of sites includes two typical antibiotic pollution resources, three land uses that may be contaminated by antibiotics, and four land uses that have not appeared in the study of ARGs, but have a great impact on the local ecological environment. The sampling sites were designated as S1, S2…S15. Detailed information about the sampling sites was given in Supplementary Table S1.
Soil samples were collected from 0–20 cm of topsoil in July 2019, and immediately returned to the laboratory using ice packs. The soil samples were subdivided into two parts, where one of which was used for DNA extraction and stored at −80 °C, and the other was air-dried (soil particle size < 2 mm) and stored at 4 °C for the determination of physical and chemical properties.

2.2. Determination of Environmental Variables

The environmental variables include pH, nitrate nitrogen (NO3-), ammonium nitrogen (NH4+), total carbon (TC), total nitrogen (TN), toxic metals, and polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) of soil. The soil pH was analyzed in 1:2.5 soil/water after 1 h of shaking at 220 rpm. The determination of nitrate nitrogen and ammonium nitrogen was performed using a continuous flow analyzer (SEAL, AA3, Germany). The TC and TN were measured by a C/N Analyzer (Vario MAX C/N, Germany) [32]. The soil sample was prepared by solid phase extraction (SPE) after being extracted by the extract (EDTA- sodium phosphate buffer–acetonitrile, Mg(NO3)2-NH3-2O), and the soil antibiotics were measured through a high performance liquid chromatography-mass spectrometer (HPLC-MS) (3200 QTRAP™ LC/MS/MS system, SCIEX, USA). The details of this are in the Supplementary Information.
A total of fourteen toxic metals (e.g., Beryllium (Be), Chromium (Cr), Manganese (Mn), Iron (Fe), Cobalt (Co), Nickel (Ni), Copper (Cu), Zinc (Zn), Arsenic (As), Cadmium (Cd), Antimony (Sb), Barium (Ba), Lead (Pb), and Bismuth (Bi)) were detected in the soil by inductively coupled plasma-mass spectrometry (iCAPQ, ThermoFisher, USA). The PAHs were determined by gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (Agilent 5977A, USA).

2.3. DNA Extraction and High-Throughput Quantitative PCR (HT-qPCR)

The soil DNA was extracted using 0.25 g of soil following the instructions of the DNeasy PowerSoil Kit (MOBIO, USA). To ensure the quality, the extracted soil DNA was run on 1% agarose gel electrophoresis, and the DNA concentration was further quantified using Nanodrop2000 (Nano-Drop, USA). The DNA was then diluted with sterile water to 10 ng/uL, and was kept at −20 °C for subsequent experiments. The HT-qPCR was performed through the SmartChip real-time PCR system (WaferGen, USA), which has the capacity to process 5184 nanopore reactions per run. A total of 384 pairs of primers were selected to target 283 common ARGs and 12 mobile genetic elements (MGEs). The MGEs included 8 transposons, 4 common integrons (intI 1, intI 1LC, intI 2, intI 3) and a 16S rRNA gene. The PCR system consisted of nuclease-free PCR grade water (Promega, USA), 1 × LightCycler 480 SYBR Green I Master, 20 mg/mL of bovine serum albumin (BSA), 500 nM of forward and reverse primer, and 20 ng/μL of DNA templates. The enzyme was first activated at 95 °C for 10 min, denatured at 95 °C for 30 s, annealed and extended at 60 °C for 30 s, and cycled 40 times. The melting curve was automatically generated using WaferGen software, and the qPCR results were analyzed by SmartChip qPCR Software. Data including multiple melting peaks and amplification efficiency exceeding the range (1.8–2.2) were removed. Each sample contained three replicates with a cycle threshold (CT) of 31 as the detection limit [33]. The three replicates were only regarded as positive when they were successfully amplified. The relative copy numbers of ARGs and MGEs were calculated on the WaferGen platform according to Equation (1), and normalized to absolute gene copy numbers following Equation (2), so as to minimize the error caused by the 16S rRNA gene abundance difference between the samples. The standardized copy number of ARGs for each bacterial cell was used and calculated as follows:
Relative gene copy number = 10(31−CT)/(10/3)
Normalized copy number of ARG gene = (Relative ARG gene copy number / Relative 16S rRNA gene copy number) × 4.1
where CT is the threshold, and 4.1 is the average number of 16S rRNA genes in each bacterium (estimated from the ribosome operon copy number database).

2.4. Quantitative PCR (qPCR)

The absolute abundance of ARGs was determined using a Roche 480 fluorescence quantitative PCR instrument. For the absolute quantification of ARGs by an external standard method, the standard plasmid with the original concentration of 1.38 × 108 copy/μL was sequentially diluted 10-fold to construct a standard curve. The reaction system (20 uL) included 10 μL of LightCycler 480 SYBR Green I Master Mix, 0.8 μL of 16S rRNA gene primer (10 μM), 2 μL of the DNA template, 0.5 μL of the BSA solution (20 ug/μL), and nuclease-free water. The program of the PCR reaction included pre-denaturation at 95 °C for 5 min, entering the cycle, denaturation at 95 °C for 15 s, annealing at 60 °C for 1 min, extension at 72 °C for 5 s, and circulation 40 times. The dissolution curve was automatically added by the instrument, and nucleic acid-free water was used as a negative control. Each sample of this study was in triplicate.

2.5. 16S rRNA Gene Amplification and Illumina High-Throughput Sequencing

DNA samples were diluted to 20 ng/μL, and a two-step PCR amplification protocol was applied to amplify the V4–V5 region fragment of the bacterial 16S rRNA gene (515F-907R) in each sample. The first step was amplified in triplicate in a reaction system (50 μL), which included 25 μL of 2 × premix Takara Ex Taq (Takara, Japan), 1 μL and 10 μM of forward and reverse primers, PCR-grade water, and 20 mg/mL of BSA. PCR was performed according to the procedure of the bacterial primer pair (95 °C/5 min, 94 °C/30 s, 58 °C/30 s, 72 °C/30 s, 72 °C/10 min, cycled 35 times). Then, 5 μL of each reaction system was loaded on 1% agarose gel, and the PCR quality was controlled by verifying no band was in the negative control. The next step was the purification of the reaction system: the bacterial amplicon was loaded onto 1.5% agarose gel and run at 120 V for 40 min. Next, the DNA purification kit DP214 (Beijing, China) was used to cut the band into about 400 bp fragments, which were then purified. The DNA concentration was again determined by fluorescence, and 300 ng of DNA from each barcode amplicon was pooled in a gene bank of each microbiome. Then, sequencing was performed on the Illumina HiSeq 2500 platform.
Sequences were pre-processed in USEARCH v10.0 [25] and VSEARCH v2.12.0, then denoised using UNOISE3 into zero-radius Operational Taxonomic Units (ZOTUs). The amplicon readings were then combined at double ends (with at least a 50 bps overlap). The primers and barcodes were trimmed, and the chimeras and filtered mass were removed using USEARCH v10.0 (maximum expected error threshold was 1.0). The average length of the remaining high-quality amplicon reads was 392 bps (bacterial). The VSEARCH v2.12.0 and the Silva/UNITE database were used to classify ZOTUs. According to the bioinformatics perspective, ZOTUs with lower mass numbers (<10 sequence compositions) may represent PCR or sequencing errors, and therefore have been removed from the sample. For the observed species (ZOTU number), the Chao1 index was used to describe the α diversity of each sample, and a box plot was generated to compare the bacterial OTU diversity.

2.6. Data Analysis

Significant differences among the samples were performed using SPSS 20.0 at p < 0.05. The principal coordinate analysis (PCoA), distance-based redundancy analysis (db-RDA), and variation partitioning analysis (VPA) were performed using the R software ‘vegan’ package, and the heat map was drawn using the ‘pheatmap’ package. The Pearson correlation coefficient was calculated using the ‘psych’ package. The network analysis was visualized using Cytoscape software, and the drawing of other graphics was made using Origin 2018.

3. Results

3.1. ARG Profile and Microbial Spatial Pattern

The ARGs and MGEs were detected in all sampling sites. The absolute abundance of ARGs and MGEs in the collected samples were ranged from 5.00 × 10^4 to 1.04 × 10^8 copies/g, in which the highest abundance of ARGs were detected in S5, followed by S4, S15, and S6 (Figure 2a). The absolute abundance of ARGs in petroleum storage, the sludge treatment plant, and the pharmaceutical plant was much higher than that in other land use (Figure 2b). Aminoglycosides, multidrugs, beta-lactams, and macrolides were the most widely distributed classes of ARGs (Figure 2c). The highest number of ARGs were detected in S4 (99), while the lowest were detected in S5 (30). The number of ARGs detected in some sites was similar to that of nearby sites, but differed greatly from sites of the same land-use type. The numbers of ARGs detected in the aquaculture area were in the order of S4 > S12; in a residential area, the number of detected ARGs in S9 were much higher than that of S7 and S11; and in farmland, the number of detected ARGs in S10 were significantly higher than that of S13 and S14, but the number of detected ARGs in S9 was similar to that in S10. Unlike absolute abundance, the number of ARGs detected in petroleum storage, the sludge treatment plant, and the pharmaceutical plant was not higher than that in other land uses (Figure 2d).
There was a strong positive correlation (Pearson’s r = 0.82, p = 0.05) between the absolute abundance of MGEs and ARGs (Figure 2e). The normalized abundance represented the degree of ARG enrichment in soil bacteria (Figure 2f). Multidrug and aminoglycoside ARGs accumulated the most in microbial cells. The normalized abundance of aminoglycoside ARGs were the highest in S6, and the normalized abundance of multidrug and tetracycline ARGs were the highest in S5.
A total of 100 high-abundance detected ARG subtypes and MGEs were profiled for further study (Figure 3). The sampling site was generally enriched with 32 ARG subtypes and MGEs, including 8 aminoglycoside ARGs, 7 multidrug ARGs, 4 macrolide ARGs, several other ARGs subtypes (tetracyclines, sulfonamides, beta-lactams, fluoroquinolone), and MGEs, of which aac-Via was the most abundant ARG subtype. Among the detected MGEs, IS1247, ISEcp1, intI 1, and trb-C were the most abundant. IS1247 was enriched in all of the samples, with the highest abundance in S4 and the lowest abundance in S8. The abundance of mef (B) and sulAfolP in the petroleum storage area (S5) was higher than that in other samples, but it was much lower for aadA7, aph6ic, spcN, aph4ib, tetG&F, QnrB4, and mdtg. The abundance of ISEcp1 and intI 1 in S5 was higher than other sites, but trb-C was the opposite.
The microbial diversity (chao1 index) in the aquafarm and the petroleum storage depot was lower than in other land uses (Figure 4a). Overall, the alpha diversity of the bacterial community was not significantly different whether it was in different land uses or regions (Figure 4b), which contributed 26.7% and 8.34% of the total variance (Figure 4c,d). Proteobacteria and Acidobacteria were the dominant species in the soil bacterial community. Proteobacteria occupied a higher proportion of the bacterial community in the petroleum storage depot than in other land uses (Figure 4c), while Acidobacteria occupied a smaller proportion. Compared with Proteobacteria, the microbial composition of other phyla had more differences in different land uses or regions (Figure 4d).

3.2. The Contribution of Environmental Factors on ARGs and Microbial Community

Redundancy analysis (RDA) and variance partitioning canonical correspondence analysis (VPA) was applied to show the contribution of soil chemical properties (pH, TC, TN, ammonia, nitrate), toxic metals (Be, Cr, Co, Ni, Cu, Zn, As, Pb, Cd, Sb, Ba, Bi), PAHs on ARGs, and bacterial community distribution with different land use (Figure 5). The vectors representing toxic metals and PAHs had similar directions with the first (interpretation: 42.05%) and second axes (interpretation: 13.29%), which affected the distribution of ARGs, respectively. Soil chemical properties, toxic metals, and PAHs accounted for 36%, 50%, and 36% of the total variance. The common interpretation of these factors was 27%.
The contribution of soil chemical properties, toxic metals, and PAHs to the bacterial community was far less than the ARG distribution. The soil chemical properties independently explained 7% of the total variance, 3% of the toxic metals, and 8% of the PAHs. The toxic metals and PAHs commonly contributed 6% of the total variance. Antibiotics and ARGs interpreted 3% and 9% of the bacterial community variance in different land use.

3.3. Relationship among ARGs, MGEs, and Microbial Community

Network analysis was performed to analyze the relationships between MGEs and ARG subtypes (Figure 6), which included 6 soil microbial phyla, 100 high-abundance ARG subtypes, and 20 MGEs (Pearson’s r > 0.6, p < 0.01). Three modules were set up in the network. In module I, aminoglycoside ARG subtypes were the main part and MGEs were at the edge, while MGEs played a different role in Module II and III as hubs. Module II consisted of multiple ARGs, with ISEfm1, IS256, and IS26 closely linked to ARGs and other MGEs as hubs. The scale of Module III was small, but the contributing ARGs were widely distributed in the environment. Among them, intI 1 was significantly correlated with the higher abundance of ARG subtypes (qnrD, mepA, ttgA, and ttgB). Different from the coupling relationship between ARGs and MGEs, the main phyla of bacterial communities formed a relatively independent module in the co-occurrence network, and had no obvious association with ARGs and MGEs (Figure S1).
The co-occurrence network of ARGs, MGEs, and bacterial communities in distinct land use showed that various ARG enrichment degrees had different effects on the bacterial community structure (Figure 7). The average degree of the co-occurrence network of ARGs, MGEs, and bacteria had a positive correlation with the absolute abundance of ARGs (R = 0.88, p = 0.02) (Figure 8).

4. Discussion

4.1. The Characteristics of ARG Distribution

The results showed that ARGs and MGEs were widely enriched in aquafarms, pharmaceutical factories, and sewage treatment with a massive application of antibiotics [34,35,36]. In this study, the abundance of ARGs and MGEs within these land uses were higher than in other areas (except petroleum storage areas) (Figure 2). In addition, the distribution characteristics of ARGs in petroleum storage areas were extremely different from other sites, which further showed the important impact of land uses on ARG distribution.
Although the land-use types had a certain influence on the distribution of ARGs, the regional features were more obvious within the scope of the watershed scale. There was little difference in the number of ARGs detected in different land uses (Figure 2d). In the case of the same land use type, the distribution of ARGs and MGEs at various locations were quite dissimilar. Moreover, no apparent regional variations were found in the microbial distribution at the order level (Figure S2). The differences in the changes of ARGs and bacterial communities under the spatial geography gradient were compared. The spatial geography difference had a higher contribution to the total variation, and was more obvious in the ARG distribution (Figure S3). To some extent, the regional correlation represented the ARG transmission at the macro scale, which was also supported by the strong positive correlation between the abundance of ARGs and MGEs in the soil of the Taipu River Basin.

4.2. Driving Factors of ARG Distribution

Antibiotics and MGEs were the drivers of ARG distribution, as documented in previous studies [37,38]. The correlation analysis showed the role of two driving factors in the spatial pattern of ARGs. A typical aminoglycoside ARG subtype (aac3Via) was identified with the highest absolute abundance, while no significant correlation was observed with MGEs. The same was true for aph4ib (the co-occurrence hub of ARGs and MGEs), which implied that MGEs were not the main driving force for the enrichment of aminoglycoside ARGs in the environment. In addition, the correlation analysis showed a positive correlation between MGEs and ARGs, except aminoglycoside (Figure S4). Aminoglycoside ARGs revealed a significant positive correlation with antibiotics, but not MGEs, indicating that the enrichment of aminoglycoside ARGs were related to the antibiotic application. In contrast, multidrug ARGs and other ARGs were linked with MGEs. Some ARG subtypes were even specifically related to MGEs. For example, tet44 was only significantly associated with IS1133, while IS3 was only related to erm(36). That is to say, the distribution of aminoglycoside ARGs was related to the input of antibiotics, and the transmission of ARGs mediated by MGE was the main factor affecting the distribution pattern of other ARGs.

4.3. The Effects of Environmental Factors on ARG Distribution

Toxic metals were the key factors affecting the distribution of ARGs and MGEs [39]. The abundance of multidrug ARGs was significantly related to Cr, Co, and As (Figure S5). A significant positive correlation was found between macrolide ARGs and Cr, Co, Pb, and Bi. In addition, tetracycline, sulfonamide, and rifamycin ARGs were positively correlated with one or several toxic metals. CzcA, a typical HRG, was confirmed to have a positive coupling relationship with ARGs and a class 1 integron [22,40]. CzcA was highly enriched in the soil along the Taipu River and was strongly related to intI 1 at the watershed scale, indicating the compound pollution risk of toxic metals and ARGs in the Taipu River Basin. On the contrary, the influence of soil properties and PAHs on ARG distribution was generally not observed at the watershed scale. However, PAHs can provide selective pressure for ARG enrichment by selecting microorganisms [41]. The mechanism of soil properties (such as pH) providing selective pressure was similar to that of PAHs [42]. The investigation of the Taipu River Basin revealed soil properties and PAHs contributed more to bacterial communities and less to differences in MGEs than toxic metals (Table S2). Therefore, selective pressure may be the main mechanism for the soil properties and PAHs affecting ARG distribution.

4.4. The Effect of ARG Enrichment on Microbial Ecological Relationship

The results suggested that the effect of ARG enrichment on the bacterial community structure did not extend to the watershed scale, but did exist. For land use with a low abundance of ARGs, such as residential areas and farmland, the bacterial community was relatively independent in the co-occurrence network and had little connection with ARGs. However, in land use with a high abundance of ARGs, the bacterial community was not only closely related to ARGs and MGEs, but also divided into multiple modules in a co-occurrence network. To some extent, the differences in networks characteristics in various land uses reflected the changes in the influence of ARG enrichment on the bacterial community. In other words, the structural differences of the network indicated the feasibility of ARG enrichment as a pollutant affecting the microbial ecological relationship. The reason why pollution had not risen to the watershed scale was that the ARGs shown in the co-occurrence network were not highly enriched in the area. However, due to the significant correlation between ARGs and MGEs, the ecological risk caused by ARG migration may appear within the watershed scale.

4.5. The Indicator of ARG Transmission and Pollution Risk

The Intl1 has been proven to be a common integron closely related to multidrug resistance [43,44,45,46]. The results and previous studies also showed that the intI 1 played a key role in the distribution of high-abundance ARGs and HRGs [47]. However, the ARGs that were significantly related to intI 1 revealed a non-significant impact on the ecological relationship of the soil bacterial community in the Taipu River Basin. Actually, the dominant MGE will be taken over as selective pressure changes or new genes enter the pool [48]. IS1247 was a common transposase in the co-occurrence network of ARGs and bacterial communities under different land uses, and can spread between different bacteria and pathogens [49,50]. It has been found to have a close correlation with ARG subtypes in water and the guts of insects, fish, and humans [51,52,53]. IS insertions can move regions adjacent to alter the ARG expression, enhance the niche adaptability of bacteria, and affect the structure of the bacterial communities [54,55,56]. Jose, etc., suggested that the co-occurrence network of integrons and microorganisms reflects the specific hosts of integrons, the dominant bacteria, and their relationship under resistance pressure [57]. This study showed that IS1247 was widespread in the Taipu River Basin, and was strongly related to the co-occurrence network properties (average degree, density, average clustering coefficient) of ARGs, MGEs, and the bacterial community (Figure 8), but not environmental factors, which indicated that IS1247 was a common and stable element that can be used to measure the impact of ARGs on the properties of bacterial co-occurrence networks. In other words, intI 1 can be regarded as an indicator of MGE-mediated ARG transmission under the influence of toxic metals, while IS1247 was more suitable as an indicator of the influence of ARGs on the bacterial community structure.

5. Conclusions

Our study provides comprehensive insights into the migration, pollutant coupling, and microbial ecological risks of soil ARGs at the macro scale. The ARGs were widespread in the soils of the Taipu River Basin. Due to the selection induced by the antibiotic application and MGE-mediated ARG transmission, the distribution of ARGs formed the spatial characteristics of land use type differences and regional similarities at the watershed scale. MGE-mediated ARG transmission had a greater impact on the complex spatial pattern caused by urbanization at the macro scale. In this process, toxic metals formed a coupling pollution with ARGs through co-selection mediated by MGEs. In contrast, PAHs and soil properties affected the ARG distribution mainly through the shift in bacterial community. In general, the contribution of toxic metal-induced co-selection to the ARG distribution was greater than the contribution of PAHs and soil properties in the Taipu River Basin. The enrichment of ARGs significantly changed the microbial ecological relationship in certain areas of the Taipu River Basin, and these changes might be able to reach to the basin scale. Intl1 and IS1247 could be used as molecular indicators of the potential transmission capacity of ARGs and the influence on the soil bacterial community in the Taipu River Basin, respectively. This study provides new insights into the migration of ARGs in riverside soils and their impact on the ecological relationship of bacteria at a macro scale.

Supplementary Materials

The following are available online at https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/su13179748/s1, Figure S1: Co-occurrence network of soil ARGs, MGEs and microorganism in the Taipu River Basin (Pearson’s R > 0.6, p < 0.05); Figure S2: Major soil microbial class distribution (Normalized through z-score, and clustered by k means); Figure S3: Principal coordinate analysis (PCoA) of (a). ARGs and (b). microorganisms; Figure S4: Correlation of ARGs, MGEs and antibiotics, Figure S5: Correlation of heavy metal and ARGs. Table S1: Sample site land use types and administrative divisions (WJ: WuJiang, QP: QingPu, JS: JiaShan); Table S2: Correlation of MGEs and environmental factors (*: p < 0.05. N: |Pearson’s R| < 0.2).

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, Y.-L.H. and G.L.; methodology, Y.-L.H.; software, Z.-F.X.; validation, Y.-L.H., G.L. and Z.-F.X.; formal analysis, Y.-L.H.; investigation, Y.-L.H., X.-W.Y. and Z.-F.X.; writing—original draft preparation, Y.-L.H.; writing—review and editing, N.L., M.A., Y.Z. and G.L.; visualization, Y.-L.H.; supervision, X.-W.Y. and G.L.; project administration, G.L.; funding acquisition, G.L. and Y.-Y.X. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by Ministry of Science and Technology of China (MSTC) with National Key Research and Development Program (2017YFE0119000) and Xiamen Bureau of Science and Technology of China (3502Z20193075).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The original data were uploaded in https://github.com/HYLscott/TaipuRiver-ARGs.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest. The funders had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript; or in the decision to publish the results.

References

  1. Pruden, A.; Pei, R.; Storteboom, H. Antibiotic resistance genes as emerging contaminants: Studies in northern Colorado. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2006, 40, 7445–7450. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Qiao, M.; Ying, G.-G.; Singer, A.C. Review of antibiotic resistance in China and its environment. Environ. Int. 2018, 110, 160–172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  3. Lu, J.; Zhang, Y.; Wu, J.; Wang, J.; Zhang, C.; Lin, Y. Occurrence and spatial distribution of antibiotic resistance genes in the Bohai Sea and Yellow Sea areas, China. Environ. Pollut. 2019, 252, 450–460. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Luo, Y.; Mao, D.; Rysz, M.; Zhou, Q.; Zhang, H.; Xu, L.; Alvarez, P.J.J. Trends in Antibiotic Resistance Genes Occurrence in the Haihe River, China. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2010, 44, 7220–7225. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Zhou, L.-J.; Li, J.; Zhang, Y.; Kong, L.; Jin, M.; Yang, X.; Wu, Q.L. Trends in the occurrence and risk assessment of antibiotics in shallow lakes in the lower-middle reaches of the Yangtze River basin, China. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2019, 183, 109511. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Chen, B.; Liang, X.; Huang, X. Differentiating anthropogenic impacts on ARGs in the Pearl River Estuary by using suitable gene indicators. Water Res. 2013, 47, 2811–2820. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Singh, R.; Singh, A.P.; Kumar, S.; Giri, B.S.; Kim, K.-H. Antibiotic resistance in major rivers in the world: A systematic review on occurrence, emergence, and management strategies. J. Clean. Prod. 2019, 234, 1484–1505. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Zhu, Y.-G.; Zhao, Y.; Li, B. Continental-scale pollution of estuaries with antibiotic resistance genes. Nat. Microbiol. 2017, 2, 1–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Riesenfeld, C.S.; Goodman, R.M.; Handelsman, J. Uncultured soil bacteria are a reservoir of new antibiotic resistance genes. Environ. Microbiol. 2004, 6, 981–989. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Rodriguez-mozaz, S.; Chamorro, S.; Marti, E. Occurrence of antibiotics and antibiotic resistance genes in hospital and urban wastewaters and their impact on the receiving river. Water Res. 2015, 69, 234–242. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Rizzo, L.; Manaia, C.; Merlin, C. Urban wastewater treatment plants as hotspots for antibiotic resistant bacteria and genes spread into the environment: A review. Sci. Total Environ. 2013, 447, 345–360. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  12. Guo, J.H.; Li, J.; Chen, H. Metagenomic analysis reveals wastewater treatment plants as hotspots of antibiotic resistance genes and mobile genetic elements. Water Res. 2017, 123, 468–478. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Kumar, M.; Ram, B.; Sewwandi, H. Treatment enhances the prevalence of antibiotic-resistant bacteria and antibiotic resistance genes in the wastewater of Sri Lanka, and India. Environ. Res. 2020, 183, 109179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Heuer, H.; Schmitt, H.; Smalla, K. Antibiotic resistance gene spread due to manure application on agricultural fields. Curr. Opin. Microbiol. 2011, 14, 236–243. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Chen, Q.; An, X.; Li, H. Long-term field application of sewage sludge increases the abundance of antibiotic resistance genes in soil. Environ. Int. 2016, 92, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Wang, J.-Y.; An, X.-L.; Huang, F.-Y. Antibiotic resistome in a landfill leachate treatment plant and effluent-receiving river. Chemosphere 2020, 242, 125207. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Yan, Z.-Z.; Chen, Q.-L.; Zhang, Y.-J. Antibiotic resistance in urban green spaces mirrors the pattern of industrial distribution. Environ. Int. 2019, 132, 105106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Ochman, H.; Lawrence, J.G.; Groisman, E.A. Lateral gene transfer and the nature of bacterial innovation. Nature 2000, 405, 299–304. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Allen, H.K.; Donato, J.; Wang, H.H. Call of the wild: Antibiotic resistance genes in natural environments. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 2010, 8, 251–259. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Ahmed, W.; Zhang, Q.; Lobos, A. Precipitation influences pathogenic bacteria and antibiotic resistance genes abundance in storm drain outfalls in coastal subtropical waters. Environ. Int. 2018, 116, 308–318. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Tang, X.; Lou, C.; Wang, S. Effects of long-term manure applications on the occurrence of antibiotics and antibiotic resistance genes (ARGs) in paddy soils: Evidence from four field experiments in south of China. Soil Biol. Biochem. 2015, 90, 179–187. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Di Cesare, A.; Eckert, E.M.; D’urso, S. Co-occurrence of integrase 1, antibiotic and heavy metal resistance genes in municipal wastewater treatment plants. Water Res. 2016, 94, 208–214. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Lin, H.; Jiang, L.; Li, B. Screening and evaluation of heavy metals facilitating antibiotic resistance gene transfer in a sludge bacterial community. Sci. Total Environ. 2019, 695, 133862. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Grenni, P.; Ancona, V.; Caracciolo, A.B. Ecological effects of antibiotics on natural ecosystems: A review. Microchem. J. 2018, 136, 25–39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Ben, Y.J.; Fu, C.X.; Hu, M. Human health risk assessment of antibiotic resistance associated with antibiotic residues in the environment: A review. Environ. Res. 2019, 169, 483–493. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Yassour, M.; Vatanen, T.; Siljander, H. Natural history of the infant gut microbiome and impact of antibiotic treatment on bacterial strain diversity and stability. Sci. Transl. Med. 2016, 8, 343ra81. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  27. Yan, W.; Guo, Y.; Xiao, Y. The changes of bacterial communities and antibiotic resistance genes in microbial fuel cells during long-term oxytetracycline processing. Water Res. 2018, 142, 105–114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Zhao, R.; Feng, J.; Liu, J. Deciphering of microbial community and antibiotic resistance genes in activated sludge reactors under high selective pressure of different antibiotics. Water Res. 2019, 151, 388–402. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Peng, F.; Guo, Y.; Isabwe, A. Urbanization drives riverine bacterial antibiotic resistome more than taxonomic community at watershed scale. Environ. Int. 2020, 137, 105524. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Xu, J.; Zhang, Y.; Zhou, C.; Guo, C.; Wang, D.; Du, P.; Luo, Y.; Wan, J.; Meng, W. Distribution, sources and composition of antibiotics in sediment, overlying water and pore water from Taihu Lake, China. Sci. Total Environ. 2014, 497, 267–273. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  31. Wu, D.; Su, Y.; Xi, H. Urban and agriculturally influenced water contribute differently to the spread of antibiotic resistance genes in a mega-city river network. Water Res. 2019, 158, 11–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Chen, Q.L.; Ding, J.; Zhu, D. Rare microbial taxa as the major drivers of ecosystem multifunctionality in long-term fertilized soils. Soil Biol. Biochem. 2020, 141, 107686. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Wang, F.H.; Qiao, M.; Su, J.Q. High Throughput Profiling of Antibiotic Resistance Genes in Urban Park Soils with Reclaimed Water Irrigation. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2014, 48, 9079–9085. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Fang, H.; Huang, K.L.; Yu, J.N. Metagenomic analysis of bacterial communities and antibiotic resistance genes in the Eriocheir sinensis freshwater aquaculture environment. Chemosphere 2019, 224, 202–211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Aydin, S.; Ince, B.; Ince, O. Development of antibiotic resistance genes in microbial communities during long-term operation of anaerobic reactors in the treatment of pharmaceutical wastewater. Water Res. 2015, 83, 337–344. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Bengtsson-Palme, J.; Hammaren, R.; Pal, C. Elucidating selection processes for antibiotic resisitance in sewage treatment plants using metagenomics. Sci. Total Environ. 2016, 572, 697–712. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Su, J.Q.; Wei, B.; Ou-Yang, W.Y. Antibiotic Resistome and Its Association with Bacterial Communities during Sewage Sludge Composting. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2015, 49, 7356–7363. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Wang, H.J.; Hou, L.Y.; Liu, Y.Q. Horizontal and vertical gene transfer drive sediment antibiotic resistome in an urban lagoon system. J. Environ. Sci. 2021, 102, 11–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Mazhar, S.H.; Li, X.; Rashid, A. Co-selection of antibiotic resistance genes, and mobile genetic elements in the presence of heavy metals in poultry farm environments. Sci. Total Environ. 2021, 755, 142702. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  40. Liu, K.; Sun, M.; Ye, M. Coexistence and association between heavy metals, tetracycline and corresponding resistance genes in vermicomposts originating from different substrates. Environ. Pollut. 2019, 244, 28–37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Chen, B.; He, R.; Yuan, K. Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) enriching antibiotic resistance genes (ARGs) in the soils. Environ. Pollut. 2017, 220, 1005–1013. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  42. Lin, H.; Sun, W.; Yu, Q. Acidic conditions enhance the removal of sulfonamide antibiotics and antibiotic resistance determinants in swine manure. Environ. Pollut. 2020, 263, 114439. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Chen, B.; Liang, X.; Nie, X.; Huang, X.; Zou, S.; Li, X. The role of class I integrons in the dissemination of sulfonamide resistance genes in the Pearl River and Pearl River Estuary, South China. J. Hazard. Mater. 2015, 282, 61–67. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. He, L.-Y.; Liu, Y.-S.; Su, H.-C. Dissemination of Antibiotic Resistance Genes in Representative Broiler Feedlots Environments: Identification of Indicator ARGs and Correlations with Environmental Variables. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2014, 48, 13120–13129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Nemec, A.; Krizova, L.; Maixnerova, M. Multidrug-resistant epidemic clones among bloodstream isolates of Pseudomonas aeruginosa in the Czech Republic. Res. Microbiol. 2010, 161, 234–242. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Makowska, N.; Koczura, R.; Mokracka, J. Class 1 integrase, sulfonamide and tetracycline resistance genes in wastewater treatment plant and surface water. Chemosphere 2016, 144, 1665–1673. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Gillings, M.R.; Gaze, W.H.; Pruden, A. Using the class 1 integron-integrase gene as a proxy for anthropogenic pollution. ISME J. 2015, 9, 1269–1279. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Partridge, S.R. Analysis of antibiotic resistance regions in Gram-negative bacteria. FEMS Microbiol. Rev. 2011, 35, 820–855. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  49. Krauland, M.; Harrison, L.; Paterson, D. Novel integron gene cassette arrays identified in a global collection of multi-drug resistant non-typhoidal Salmonella enterica. Curr. Microbiol. 2010, 60, 217–223. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  50. Zhu, X.; Li, P.; Qian, C. Prevalence of aminoglycoside resistance genes and molecular characterization of a novel gene, aac (3)-IIg, among clinical isolates of the Enterobacter cloacae complex from a Chinese teaching hospital. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2020, 64, e00852-20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  51. Sosa-Moreno, A.; Comstock, S.S.; Sugino, K.Y. Perinatal risk factors for fecal antibiotic resistance gene patterns in pregnant women and their infants. PLoS ONE 2020, 15, e0234751. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Wu, N.; Liang, J.; Wang, X. Copper stimulates the incidence of antibiotic resistance, metal resistance and potential pathogens in the gut of black soldier fly larvae. J. Environ. Sci. 2021, 107, 150–159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Zhou, Z.C.; Lin, Z.J.; Shuai, X.Y. Temporal variation and sharing of antibiotic resistance genes between water and wild fish gut in a peri-urban river. J. Environ. Sci. 2021, 103, 12–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Roy, P.H.; Partridge, S.R. Genetic Mechanisms of Transfer of Drug Resistance. In Antimicrobial Drug Resistance; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2017; pp. 61–76. [Google Scholar]
  55. Vandecraen, J.; Chandler, M.; Aertsen, A. The impact of insertion sequences on bacterial genome plasticity and adaptability. Crit. Rev. Microbiol. 2017, 43, 709–730. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Hawkey, J.; Hamidian, M.; Wick, R.R. ISM apper: Identifying transposase insertion sites in bacterial genomes from short read sequence data. BMC Genom. 2015, 16, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  57. Martinez, J.L.; Fajardo, A.; Garmendia, L. A global view of antibiotic resistance. FEMS Microbiol. Rev. 2009, 33, 44–65. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
Figure 1. The sample sites span 50 km along the Taipu River. (Detailed information of the sample sites is in Supplementary Table S1).
Figure 1. The sample sites span 50 km along the Taipu River. (Detailed information of the sample sites is in Supplementary Table S1).
Sustainability 13 09748 g001
Figure 2. Soil ARG profiles along the Taipu River. ARGs and MGEs absolute abundance in (a) different sites, and (b) different land uses. The number of ARGs detected in (c) different sites, and (d) different land uses. (e) The correlation of total absolute abundance of ARGs and MGEs. (f) Relative abundance of ARGs per bacterial cell.
Figure 2. Soil ARG profiles along the Taipu River. ARGs and MGEs absolute abundance in (a) different sites, and (b) different land uses. The number of ARGs detected in (c) different sites, and (d) different land uses. (e) The correlation of total absolute abundance of ARGs and MGEs. (f) Relative abundance of ARGs per bacterial cell.
Sustainability 13 09748 g002
Figure 3. Top 100 high-abundance ARG and MGE subtypes. (Normalized through z-score, and clustered by k means).
Figure 3. Top 100 high-abundance ARG and MGE subtypes. (Normalized through z-score, and clustered by k means).
Sustainability 13 09748 g003
Figure 4. Microbial community differences in the soil of the Taipu River Basin. (a) Microbial alpha diversity of land uses and (b) regions. (c) Microbial beta diversity among land uses and (d) regions. (e) Microbial composition of land uses and (f) regions.
Figure 4. Microbial community differences in the soil of the Taipu River Basin. (a) Microbial alpha diversity of land uses and (b) regions. (c) Microbial beta diversity among land uses and (d) regions. (e) Microbial composition of land uses and (f) regions.
Sustainability 13 09748 g004
Figure 5. Contribution of environmental factors to the distribution of ARGs and bacterial communities: (a) Redundancy analysis (RDA) of environmental factors and ARGs. (b) Interpretation of environmental factors to ARGs. (c) RDA of environmental factors and the bacterial community. (d) Interpretation of environmental factors to the bacterial community. (e) RDA of antibiotics, ARGs, and the bacterial community. (f) Interpretation of antibiotics and ARGs for the bacterial community.
Figure 5. Contribution of environmental factors to the distribution of ARGs and bacterial communities: (a) Redundancy analysis (RDA) of environmental factors and ARGs. (b) Interpretation of environmental factors to ARGs. (c) RDA of environmental factors and the bacterial community. (d) Interpretation of environmental factors to the bacterial community. (e) RDA of antibiotics, ARGs, and the bacterial community. (f) Interpretation of antibiotics and ARGs for the bacterial community.
Sustainability 13 09748 g005
Figure 6. Co-occurrence among high abundance ARGs and MGEs in the Taipu River Basin. (Pearson’s r > 0.6, p < 0.05).
Figure 6. Co-occurrence among high abundance ARGs and MGEs in the Taipu River Basin. (Pearson’s r > 0.6, p < 0.05).
Sustainability 13 09748 g006
Figure 7. Co-occurrence network of ARGs, MGEs, and bacteria (class level) in different land use. (Pearson’s r > 0.6, p < 0.05).
Figure 7. Co-occurrence network of ARGs, MGEs, and bacteria (class level) in different land use. (Pearson’s r > 0.6, p < 0.05).
Sustainability 13 09748 g007
Figure 8. The influence of ARGs and IS1247 on the bacterial community structure. (a) Correlation of ARG abundance and average degree of co-occurrence network of ARGs, MGEs, and bacteria. Correlation of IS1247 abundance and (b) the average degree, (c) the average density, and (d) the average clustering coefficient of co-occurrence network of ARGs, MGEs, and bacteria. (r: Pearson’s r).
Figure 8. The influence of ARGs and IS1247 on the bacterial community structure. (a) Correlation of ARG abundance and average degree of co-occurrence network of ARGs, MGEs, and bacteria. Correlation of IS1247 abundance and (b) the average degree, (c) the average density, and (d) the average clustering coefficient of co-occurrence network of ARGs, MGEs, and bacteria. (r: Pearson’s r).
Sustainability 13 09748 g008
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Hao, Y.-L.; Li, G.; Xiao, Z.-F.; Liu, N.; Azeem, M.; Zhao, Y.; Xu, Y.-Y.; Yu, X.-W. Distribution and Influence on the Microbial Ecological Relationship of Antibiotic Resistance Genes in Soil at a Watershed Scale. Sustainability 2021, 13, 9748. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13179748

AMA Style

Hao Y-L, Li G, Xiao Z-F, Liu N, Azeem M, Zhao Y, Xu Y-Y, Yu X-W. Distribution and Influence on the Microbial Ecological Relationship of Antibiotic Resistance Genes in Soil at a Watershed Scale. Sustainability. 2021; 13(17):9748. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13179748

Chicago/Turabian Style

Hao, Yi-Long, Gang Li, Zu-Fei Xiao, Ning Liu, Muhammad Azeem, Yi Zhao, Yao-Yang Xu, and Xin-Wei Yu. 2021. "Distribution and Influence on the Microbial Ecological Relationship of Antibiotic Resistance Genes in Soil at a Watershed Scale" Sustainability 13, no. 17: 9748. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13179748

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop