Gym-Goers Preference Analysis of Fitness Centers during the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Conjoint Analysis Approach for Business Sustainability
Abstract
:1. Introduction
2. Literature Review
2.1. Conjoint Analysis
2.2. Fitness Centers
2.3. Business Strategies during the COVID-19 Pandemic
3. Methodology
3.1. Participant
3.2. Research Conceptualization and Conjoint Design
3.3. Statistical Analysis
4. Results
5. Discussion
6. Conclusions
6.1. Theoretical Contributions
6.2. Practical Applications
6.3. Limitations
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Tu, R.; Hsieh, P.; Feng, W. Walking for fun or for “likes”? The impacts of different gamification orientations of fitness apps on consumers’ physical activities. Sport Manag. Rev. 2019, 22, 682–693. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Angulo, J.; El Assar, M.; Bustos, A.; Rodriguez-Manas, L. Physical Activity and exercise: Strategies to manage frailty. Redox Biol. 2020, 35, 101513. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- IHRSA. 2019 Fitness Industry Trends Shed Light on 2020 & Beyond. 2020. Available online: https://www.ihrsa.org/improve-your-club/industry-news/2019-fitness-industry-trends-shed-light-on-2020-beyond/ (accessed on 2 July 2021).
- Gough, C. Health & Fitness Clubs—Statistics & Facts. 2021. Available online: https://www.statista.com/topics/1141/health-and-fitness-clubs/ (accessed on 2 July 2021).
- Cabalza, C. A Comparative Study of Gyms in the Philippines. 2014. Available online: https://www.academia.edu/11365809/A_Comparative_Study_of_Gyms_in_the_Philippines (accessed on 17 June 2021).
- Mordor Intelligence. Health And Fitness Club Market Size—Growth, Trends, Covid-19 Impact, And Forecasts (2021–2026). 2020. Available online: https://www.mordorintelligence.com/industry-reports/health-and-fitness-club-market (accessed on 20 June 2021).
- Avourdiadou, S.; Theodorakis, N.D. The development of loyalty among novice and experienced customers of sport and fitness centres. Sport Manag. Rev. 2014, 17, 419–431. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bagir, S.; Altintig, A. The Reasons for Preference of the Fitness Centres in the Sakarya Region and the Expectations of the Individuals. Procedia Soc. Behav. Sci. 2014, 143, 83–87. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Hooker, S.A.; Ross, K.M.; Ranby, K.W.; Masters, K.S.; Peters, J.C.; Hill, J.O. Identifying groups at risk for 1-year membership termination from a fitness center at enrollment. Prev. Med. Rep. 2016, 4, 563–568. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Global Business Outlook. The Philippines Enters Recession Amid COVID-19 Pandemic. 2020. Available online: https://www.globalbusinessoutlook.com/philippines-enters-recession-amid-covid-pandemic/ (accessed on 17 July 2021).
- Aguilar, K. Gyms, Tutorial Centers, Grooming Services Can Reopen in GCQ Area by Tuesday (1 September 2020). 2020. Available online: https://newsinfo.inquirer.net/1329244/gyms-tutorial-centers-grooming-services-can-reopen-in-gcq-areas-starting-Tuesday (accessed on 20 July 2021).
- Garcia-Fernandez, J.; Galvez-Ruiz, P.; Fernandez-Gavira, J.; Velez-Colon, L.; Pitts, B.; Bernal-Garcia, A. The effects of service convenience and perceived quality on perceived value, satisfaction and loyalty in low-cost fitness centers. Sports Manag. Rev. 2018, 2, 250–262. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ruotsalainen, I.; Gorbach, T.; Perkola, J.; Renvall, V.; Syvaoja, H.; Tammelin, T.; Karvanen, J.; Parvianinen, T. Physical activity, aerobic fitness, and brain white matter: Their role for executive functions in adolescence. Dev. Cogn. Neurosci. 2020, 42, 100765. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Birch, J. Inclusive fitness as a criterion for improvement. Stud. Hist. Philos. Sci. Part C Stud. Hist. Philos. Biol. Biomed. Sci. 2019, 76, 101186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Faulkner, G.; Dale, L.P.; Lau, E. Examining the use of loyalty point incentives to encourage health and fitness centre participation. Prev. Med. Rep. 2019, 14, 100831. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Barwitz, N. The relevance of interaction choice: Customer preferences and willingness to pay. J. Retail. Consum. Serv. 2020, 53, 101953. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hecke, L.; Ghekiere, A.; Cauwenberg, J.V.; Veitch, J.; Bourdeaudhuij, I.D.; Dyck, D.V.; Clarys, P.; Weghe, N.V.D.; Deforche, B. Park characteristics preferred for adolescent park visitation and physical activity: A choice-based conjoint analysus using manipulated photographs. Landsc. Urban Plan. 2018, 178, 144–155. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kim, D.; Hong, S.; Park, B.-J.; Kim, I. Understanding heterogeneous preferences of hotel choice attributes: Do customer segments matter? J. Hosp. Tour. Manag. 2020, 45, 330–337. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Meyerding, S.G.H.; Bauchrowitz, A.; Lehberger, M. Consumer preferences for beer attributes in Germany: A conjoint and latent class approach. J. Retail. Consum. Serv. 2019, 47, 229–240. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Louviere, J.; Flynn, T.; Carson, R. Discrete Choice Experiments are Not Conjoint Analysis. J. Choice Model. 2010, 3, 57–72. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Mok, M.S.; Sohn, S.Y.; Ju, Y.H. Conjoint analysis for intellectual property education. World Pat. Inf. 2010, 32, 129–134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Prasetyo, Y.T.; Suzianti, A.; Dewi, A.P. Consumer Preference Analysis on Flute Attributes in Indonesia Using Conjoint Analysis. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Advanced Design Research and Education, ICADRE, Singapore, 16–18 July 2014; pp. 111–117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shih, S.P.; Yu, S.; Tseng, H.C. The Study of Consumers’ Buying Behavior and Consumer Satisfaction in Beverages Industry in Tainan, Taiwan. J. Econ. Bus. Manag. 2015, 3, 391–394. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Khanna, V. A Study on Factors Impacting Consumer Preference and Purchase Intention: With Special Reference to Beverage Industry. In Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Recent Innovations in Science, Technology, Management, and Environment, New Delhi, India, 18 December 2016; Available online: http://data.conferenceworld.in/IFUNA18DEC16/P493-512.pdf (accessed on 14 June 2021).
- Lee, N.; Vega, A. Factors Affecting Consumers’ Buying Behavior on Selected Milk Tea Stores Towards Obtaining Sustainability. Cognoscere SPUQC Stud. Res. J. 2014, 9. Available online: https://ejournals.ph/article.php?id=6927 (accessed on 14 June 2021).
- Pleger, L.E.; Mertes, A.; Rey, A.; Brüesch, C. Allowing users to pick and choose: A conjoint analysis of end-user preferences of public e-services. Gov. Inf. Q. 2020, 37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Veitch, J.; Salmon, J.; Deforche, B.; Ghekiere, A.; Van Cauwenberg, J.; Bangay, S.; Timperio, A. Park attributes that encourage park visitation among adolescents: A conjoint analysis. Landsc. Urban Plan. 2017, 161, 52–58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pinto, D.; Bockenholt, U.; Chang, R.; Sharma, L.; Finn, D.J.; Heinemann, A.; Holl, J.; Hansen, P. Preference for physical activity: A conjoint analysis involving people with chronic knee pain. Osteoarthr. Cartil. 2019, 27, 240–247. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Moore, W.L. A cross-validity comparison of rating-based and choice-based conjoint analysis models. Int. J. Res. Mark. 2004, 21, 299–312. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ong, A.K.S.; Prasetyo, Y.T.; Libiran, M.A.D.C.; Lontoc, Y.M.A.; Lunaria, J.A.V.; Manalo, A.M.; Miraja, B.A.; Young, M.N.; Chuenyindee, T.; Persada, S.F.; et al. Consumer Preference Analysis on Attributes of Milk Tea: A Conjoint Analysis Approach. Foods 2021, 10, 1382. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ong, A.K.; Prasetyo, Y.T.; Young, M.N.; Diaz, J.F.; Chuenyindee, T.; Kusonwattana, P.; Yuduang, N.; Nadlifatin, R.; Redi, A.A. Students’ preference analysis on online learning attributes in industrial engineering education during the covid-19 pandemic: A conjoint analysis approach for sustainable industrial engineers. Sustainability 2021, 13, 8339. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Acharaya, B.; Lee, J. User’s perspective on the adaptation of e-learning in developing countries: The case of Nepal with a conjoint-based discrete choice approach. Telemat. Inform. 2018, 35, 1733–1743. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Factor, E.M.R.; de Guzman, A.B. Explicating Filipino student nurses’ preferences of clinical instructors’ attributes: A conjoint analysis. Nurse Educ. Today 2017, 55, 122–127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Sohn, S.Y.; Ju, Y.H. Conjoint analysis for recruiting high quality students for college education. Expert Syst. Appl. 2010, 37, 3777–3783. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cameron, T.A.; DeShazo, J.R. Differential Attention to Attributes in Utility-Theoretical Choice Model. J. Choice Model. 2010, 3, 73–115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Motta, M. Can a COVID-19 vaccine live up to Americans’ expectations? A conjoint analysis of how vaccine characteristics influence vaccination intentions. Soc. Sci. Med. 2021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kosenko, R.; Rahtz, D. Buyer Market Price Knowledge Influence on Acceptable Price Range and Price Limit. Assoc. Consum. Res. 1988, 15, 328–331. [Google Scholar]
- Rao, A.; Sieben, W. The Effect of Prior Knowledge on Price Acceptability and the Type of Information Examined. J. Consum. Res. 1992, 19, 488. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Blocken, B.; van Druenen, T.; Ricci, A.; Kang, L.; van Hoof, T.; Qin, P.; Xia, L.; Alanis Ruiz, C.; Arts, J.H.; Brombacher, A.C.; et al. Ventilation and air cleaning to limit aerosol particle concentrations in a gym during the COVID-19 pandemic. Build. Environ. 2021, 193, 107659. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ramos, C.A.; Wolterbeek, H.T.; Almeida, S.M. Exposure to indoor air pollutants during physical activity in fitness centers. Build. Environ. 2014, 82, 349–360. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Woolf, J. Competitive Advantage in the Health and Fitness Industry: Developing Service Bundles. Sport Manag. Rev. 2008, 11, 51–75. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Boden, J.; Maier, E.; Wilken, R. The effect of credit card versus mobile payment on convenience and consumers’ willingness to pay. J. Retail. Consum. Serv. 2020, 52, 101910. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Szumski, O. Digital Payment Methods within Polish students—Leading decision characteristics. Procedia Comput. Sci. 2020, 176, 3456–3465. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dornadula, V.N.; Geetha, S. Credit Card Fraud Detection Using Machine Learning Algorithm. Procedia Comput. Sci. 2019, 165, 631–641. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, W.; Tan, J.; Meng, W.; Wang, Y. A swipe-based unlocking mechanism with supervised learning on smartphones: Design and evaluation. J. Netw. Comput. Appl. 2020, 165, 102687. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Focardi, R.; Luccio, F.; Wahsheh, H. Usable security for QR code. J. Inf. Secur. Appl. 2019, 48, 102369. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- León-Quismondo, J.; García-Unanue, J.; Burillo, P. Best Practices for Fitness Center Business Sustainability: A Qualitative Vision. Sustainability 2020, 12, 5067. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mahdi, O.R.; Nassar, I.A. The Business Model of Sustainable Competitive Advantage through Strategic Leadership Capabilities and Knowledge Management Processes to Overcome COVID-10 Pandemic. Sustainability 2021, 13, 9891. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sahabuddin, M.; Tan, Q.; Hossain, I.; Alam, M.S.; Nekmahmud, M. Tourist environmentally responsible behavior and Satisfaction—Study on The World’s Longest Natural Sea Beach, Cox’s Bazar, Bangladesh. Sustainability 2021, 13, 9383. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pongsakornrungsilp, S.; Pongsakornrungsilp, P.; Kumar, V.; Maswongssa, B. The art of Survival: Tourism businesses in Thailand recovering from Covid-19 through brand management. Sustainability 2021, 13, 6690. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sethuraman, R.; Kerin, R.A.; Cron, W.L. A field study comparing online and offline data collection methods for identifying product attribute preferences using conjoint analysis. J. Bus. Res. 2005, 58, 602–610. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Geissdoerfer, M.; Vladimirova, D.; Evans, S. Sustainable business model innovation: A review. J. Clean. Prod. 2018, 198, 401–416. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sushil; Anbarasan, P. Organization’s sustainable operational complexity and STRATEGIC Overview: TISM approach and Asian case studies. Sustainability 2021, 13, 9790. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yang, M.; Xia, E. A systematic literature review on pricing strategies in the sharing economy. Sustainability 2021, 13, 9762. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ying, M.; Tikuye, G.A.; Shan, H. Impacts of firm performance on Corporate Social Responsibility Practices: The mediation role of Corporate Governance in Ethiopia corporate business. Sustainability 2021, 13, 9717. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ahmad, B.; Da, L.; Asif, M.H.; Irfan, M.; Ali, S.; Akbar, M.I. Understanding the antecedents and consequences of service-sales ambidexterity: A motivation-opportunity-ability (MOA) framework. Sustainability 2021, 13, 9675. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hair, J.F. Multivariate Data Analysis: A Global Perspective; Pearson: Upper Saddle River, NJ, USA, 2010. [Google Scholar]
- Wen, B.L.J.; Aun, N.B. Factors Influencing consumers’ purchase intention in Klang Valley, Malaysia: A Study of Bubble Milk Tea. BERJAYA J. Serv. Manag. 2020, 13, 29–43. Available online: https://journal.berjaya.edu.my/wp-content/uploads/2020/02/Jan-2020_29-43.pdf (accessed on 2 June 2021).
- Bezhovski, Z. The Future of the Mobile Payment as Electronic Payment System. Eur. J. Bus. Manag. 2016, 8, 2222–2839. Available online: https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/234627158.pdf (accessed on 2 June 2021).
- Acquaviva, J. Strategies for Personal Trainers. ACSM Health Fit. J. 2004, 8, 8–10. Available online: https://journals.lww.com/acsm-healthfitness/Fulltext/2004/03000/Strategies_for_Personal_Trainers.5.aspx (accessed on 5 June 2021). [CrossRef]
- De Lyon, A.; Neville, R.; Armour, K. The role of business professionals in public health: A review of the literature. Quest 2016, 69, 313–330. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Ambrosino, N. Assisted Ventilation as an aid to exercise training: A mechanical doping? Eur. Respir. J. 2006, 27, 3–5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Adhatrao, K.; Gaykar, A.; Honrao, V. A Secure Method for Signing in Using Quick Response Codes with Mobile Authentication. Int. J. Stud. Res. Technol. Manag. 2013, 1, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Lichtenstein, D.; Bloch, P.; Black, W. Correlates of Price Acceptability. J. Consum. Res. 1988, 15, 243–252. Available online: https://www.jstor.org/stable/2489529?seq=1 (accessed on 7 June 2021). [CrossRef]
- Kim, K.A.; Byon, K. A mechanism of mutually beneficial relationships between employees and consumers: A dyadic analysis of employee-consumer interaction. Sport Manag. Rev. 2018, 21, 582–595. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chen, H.; Huynh, K.; Shy, O. Cash versus card: Payment discontinuous and the burden of holding coins. J. Bank. Financ. 2019, 99, 192–201. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Subido, L.K. The Average Filipino Workweeks is the Longest It’s Ever Been. 2020. Available online: https://www.esquiremag.ph/money/industry/the-average-filipino-workweek-is-the-longest-it-s-ever-been-a00288-20190311 (accessed on 2 June 2021).
- Song, H.; Byon, K.K. Moderating effect of the power–distance belief on the relationship between employees’ service failures and customers’ behavioral outcomes in the sport service industry. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2021, 18, 2488. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Behnam, M.; Sato, M.; Baker, B.J. The role of consumer engagement in behavioral loyalty through value co-creation in fitness clubs. Sport Manag. Rev. 2021, 24, 1–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Koutsoubakis, D. A scale for measuring member commitment and integration in fitness services. Int. J. Sport Manag. Mark. 2020, 20, 356. [Google Scholar]
- Foroughi, B.; Iranmanesh, M.; Gholipour, H.F.; Hyun, S.S. Examining relationships among process quality, outcome quality, delight, satisfaction and behavioural intentions in fitness centres in Malaysia. Int. J. Sports Mark. Spons. 2019, 20, 374–389. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chiu, W.; Won, D.; Bae, J.-s. Customer value co-creation behaviour in fitness centres: How does it influence customers’ value, satisfaction, and repatronage intention? Manag. Sport Leis. 2019, 24, 32–44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cuesta-Valiño, P.; Gutiérrez-Rodríguez, P.; Loranca-Valle, C. Sustainable management of SPORTS Federations: The indirect effects of perceived service on Member’s loyalty. Sustainability 2021, 13, 458. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fernández-Martínez, A.; Murillo-Lorente, V.; Sarmiento, A.; Álvarez-Medina, J.; Nuviala, A. Exercise addiction and satisfaction of fitness center users as precursors to the intention of continuing to engage in physical activity. Sustainability 2020, 13, 129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kim, M. Conceptualization of e-servicescapes in the fitness applications and wearable devices context: Multi-dimensions, consumer satisfaction, and behavioral intention. J. Retail. Consum. Serv. 2021, 61, 102562. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- García-Fernández, J.; Gálvez-Ruiz, P.; Sánchez-Oliver, A.J.; Fernández-Gavira, J.; Pitts, B.G.; Grimaldi-Puyana, M. An analysis of new social fitness activities: Loyalty in female and Male CrossFit users. Sport Soc. 2019, 23, 204–221. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Happ, E.; Scholl-Grissemann, U.; Peters, M.; Schnitzer, M. Insights into customer experience in sports retail stores. Int. J. Sports Mark. Spons. 2020, 22, 312–329. [Google Scholar]
- Escamilla-Fajardo, P.; Alguacil, M.; Gómez-Tafalla, A.M. Effects of entrepreneurial orientation and passion for work on performance variables in sports clubs. Sustainability 2021, 13, 2920. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gálvez-Ruiz, P.; Conde-Pascual, E.; Estrella-Andrade, A.; García-Fernández, J.; Romero-Galisteo, R.P.; Vélez-Colón, L.; Pitts, B.G. Testing factorial invariance of the questionnaire of evaluation of the Quality perceived in sports services in Spanish, Ecuadorian and Colombian users. Curr. Psychol. 2018, 40, 1249–1256. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- León-Quismondo, J.; Bonal, J.; Burillo, P.; Fernández-Luna, Á. Walkability and fitness Center Prices, opening hours, and Extra services: The case of Madrid, Spain. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2020, 17, 5622. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Baena-Arroyo, M.J.; García-Fernández, J.; Gálvez-Ruiz, P.; Grimaldi-Puyana, M. Analyzing consumer loyalty through service experience and service convenience: Differences between instructor fitness classes and virtual fitness classes. Sustainability 2020, 12, 828. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Chang, C.-H.; Robinson, L.; Shu, S.-T.; Ma, S.-C. Fitness innovativeness, duration of stay, and revisit behavior: A moderation relationship. Int. J. Sports Mark. Spons. 2019, 20, 634–645. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Attributes | Levels |
---|---|
Price | <1000 PhP (<$20 USD) |
1001–2000 PhP ($21–$41.50 USD) | |
>2000 PhP (>$42 USD) | |
Payment Method | Cash |
Online payment | |
Credit card | |
Trainer | One-on-one |
One-to-many | |
Many-to-one | |
Ventilation | Fans |
Airconditioned | |
Airconditioned and fans (mixed) | |
Login | Manual |
QR code | |
Swipe/tap | |
Operating Hours | 24 h |
6 a.m. to 10 p.m. | |
9 a.m. to 9 p.m. | |
Service | Regular |
Premium | |
VIP |
Characteristics | Category | N | % |
---|---|---|---|
Gym | Anytime Fitness | 210 | 21% |
Bakal Gym | 30 | 3% | |
Fit and Flow | 10 | 1% | |
Fitness First | 130 | 13% | |
Focus Athletics | 10 | 1% | |
Gold’s Gym | 50 | 5% | |
Home Gym | 10 | 1% | |
Kinetix Lab | 10 | 1% | |
Planning to enroll | 290 | 29% | |
One fitness horizon | 10 | 1% | |
Own gym | 10 | 1% | |
Philippine Sports Performance | 20 | 2% | |
Pound For Pound Fitness | 190 | 19% | |
Prime fitness | 10 | 1% | |
Tipness Gym | 10 | 1% | |
Age | 15–24 | 700 | 70% |
25–34 | 190 | 19% | |
35–44 | 70 | 7% | |
45–54 | 40 | 4% | |
Employment Status | Entrepreneur | 50 | 5% |
Full Time Employment | 410 | 41% | |
Part Time Employment | 80 | 8% | |
Student | 400 | 40% | |
Unemployed | 60 | 6% |
Attributes | Level | Utility Estimates | Std. Error |
---|---|---|---|
Price | <1000 PhP (<$20 USD) | 0.121 | 0.042 |
1001–2000 PhP ($21–$41.50 USD) | 0.072 | 0.042 | |
>2000 PhP (>$42 USD) | −0.193 | 0.042 | |
Payment Method | Cash | 0.059 | 0.042 |
Online payment | 0.056 | 0.042 | |
Credit card | −0.115 | 0.042 | |
Trainer | One-on-one | 0.116 | 0.042 |
One-to-many | −0.097 | 0.042 | |
Many-to-one | −0.019 | 0.042 | |
Ventilation | Fans | −0.106 | 0.042 |
Fully airconditioned | 0.150 | 0.042 | |
Airconditioned and fans (mixed) | −0.044 | 0.042 | |
Login | Manual | −0.063 | 0.042 |
QR code | −0.001 | 0.042 | |
Swipe/tap | 0.064 | 0.042 | |
Operating Hours | 24 h | 0.054 | 0.042 |
6 a.m. to 10 p.m. | 0.022 | 0.042 | |
9 a.m. to 9 p.m. | −0.076 | 0.042 | |
Service | Regular | −0.148 | 0.042 |
Premium | 0.056 | 0.042 | |
VIP | 0.093 | 0.042 | |
(Constant) | 5.257 | 0.030 |
Importance Values | Score |
---|---|
Price | 21.585 |
Payment Mode | 11.951 |
Trainer | 14.634 |
Ventilation | 17.561 |
Login | 8.780 |
Operating Hours | 8.902 |
Service | 16.585 |
Value | Significance | |
---|---|---|
Pearson’s R | 0.979 | 0.00 |
Kendall’s Tau | 0.882 | 0.00 |
Kendall’s Tau Holdout | 1.000 | 0.00 |
Combination | Price | Mode of Payment | Trainer | Ventilation | Login | Operation Hours | Service | Total | Rank |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | >2000 PhP (>$42 USD) | Cash | Many-to-one | Mixed ventilation | QR code | 6 a.m. to 10 p.m. | Regular service | −0.324 | 19 |
2 | 1001–2000 PhP ($21–$41.50 USD) | Online | Many-to-one | Fully airconditioned | QR code | 9 a.m. to 9 p.m. | Regular service | 0.034 | 12 |
3 | <1000 PhP (<$20 USD) | Online | Many-to-one | Fully airconditioned | Swipe/tap | 6 a.m. to 10 p.m. | VIP service | 0.487 | 1 |
4 | <1000 PhP (<$20 USD) | Online | One-on-one | Fans | QR code | 9 a.m. to 9 p.m. | Premium service | 0.166 | 5 |
5 | 1001–2000 PhP ($21–$41.50 USD) | Online | Many-to-one | Fans | QR code | 24 h | Regular service | −0.092 | 15 |
6 | <1000 PhP (<$20 USD) | Credit card | One-to-many | Fans | Manual | 6 a.m. to 10 p.m. | Regular service | −0.386 | 20 |
7 | >2000 PhP (>$42 USD) | Online payment | One-on-one | Mixed ventilation | Manual | 24 h | VIP service | 0.019 | 13 |
8 | >2000 PhP (>$42 USD) | Online payment | One-to-many | Mixed ventilation | Manual | 9 a.m. to 9 p.m. | Regular service | −0.565 | 22 |
9 | >2000 PhP (>$42 USD) | Credit card | One-on-one | Fully airconditioned | QR code | 6 a.m. to 10 p.m. | Premium service | 0.035 | 11 |
10 | 1001–2000 PhP ($21–$41.50 USD) | Cash | Many-to-one | Fully airconditioned | Manual | 9 a.m. to 9 p.m. | Premium service | 0.179 | 4 |
11 | 1001–2000 PhP ($21–$41.50 USD) | Credit card | One-to-many | Fully airconditioned | QR code | 24 h | VIP service | 0.156 | 6 |
12 | 1001–2000 PhP ($21–$41.50 USD) | Cash | One-on-one | Fans | Swipe/tap | 6 a.m. to 10 p.m. | VIP service | 0.320 | 12 |
13 | <1000 PhP (<$20 USD) | Cash | One-to-many | Mixed ventilation | Manual | 6 a.m. to 10 p.m. | Regular service | 0.044 | 13 |
14 | >2000 PhP (>$42 USD) | Cash | One-on-one | Fully airconditioned | Manual | 9 a.m. to 9 p.m. | VIP service | 0.086 | 14 |
15 | >2000 PhP (>$42 USD) | Online payment | One-to-many | Fully airconditioned | Swipe/tap | 9 a.m. to 9 p.m. | Regular service | −0.244 | 15 |
16 | <1000 PhP (<$20 USD) | Credit card | Many-to-one | Mix | Swipe/tap | 24 h | Premium service | 0.117 | 7 |
17 | <1000 PhP (<$20 USD) | Cash | One-on-one | Fully airconditioned | Manual | 24 h | Regular service | 0.289 | 3 |
18 | <1000 PhP (<$20 USD) | Cash | One-to-many | Mix | QR code | 9 a.m. to 9 p.m. | VIP service | 0.055 | 9 |
19 | >2000 PhP (>$42 USD) | Credit card | Many-to-one | Fans | Manual | 9 a.m. to 9 p.m. | VIP service | −0.479 | 21 |
20 | 1001–2000 PhP ($21–$41.50 USD) | Credit card | One-on-one | Mixed ventilation | Swipe/tap | 9 a.m. to 9 p.m. | Regular service | −0.131 | 16 |
21 | 1001–2000 PhP ($21–$41.50 USD) | Online payment | One-to-many | Mixed ventilation | Manual | 6 a.m. to 10 p.m. | Premium service | 0.002 | 14 |
22 | >2000 PhP (>$42 USD) | Cash | One-to-many | Fans | Swipe/tap | 24 h | Premium service | −0.163 | 17 |
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. |
© 2021 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Ong, A.K.S.; Prasetyo, Y.T.; Picazo, K.L.; Salvador, K.A.; Miraja, B.A.; Kurata, Y.B.; Chuenyindee, T.; Nadlifatin, R.; Redi, A.A.N.P.; Young, M.N. Gym-Goers Preference Analysis of Fitness Centers during the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Conjoint Analysis Approach for Business Sustainability. Sustainability 2021, 13, 10481. https://doi.org/10.3390/su131810481
Ong AKS, Prasetyo YT, Picazo KL, Salvador KA, Miraja BA, Kurata YB, Chuenyindee T, Nadlifatin R, Redi AANP, Young MN. Gym-Goers Preference Analysis of Fitness Centers during the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Conjoint Analysis Approach for Business Sustainability. Sustainability. 2021; 13(18):10481. https://doi.org/10.3390/su131810481
Chicago/Turabian StyleOng, Ardvin Kester S., Yogi Tri Prasetyo, Kerr Lorenzo Picazo, Kim Aaron Salvador, Bobby Ardiansyah Miraja, Yoshiki B. Kurata, Thanatorn Chuenyindee, Reny Nadlifatin, Anak Agung Ngurah Perwira Redi, and Michael Nayat Young. 2021. "Gym-Goers Preference Analysis of Fitness Centers during the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Conjoint Analysis Approach for Business Sustainability" Sustainability 13, no. 18: 10481. https://doi.org/10.3390/su131810481
APA StyleOng, A. K. S., Prasetyo, Y. T., Picazo, K. L., Salvador, K. A., Miraja, B. A., Kurata, Y. B., Chuenyindee, T., Nadlifatin, R., Redi, A. A. N. P., & Young, M. N. (2021). Gym-Goers Preference Analysis of Fitness Centers during the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Conjoint Analysis Approach for Business Sustainability. Sustainability, 13(18), 10481. https://doi.org/10.3390/su131810481