Sustainable Development of an Individual as a Result of Mutual Enrichment of Professional and Personal Life
Abstract
:1. Introduction
2. Theoretical Background and Conceptual Frameworks
2.1. Work-Life Balance—The Evolution of the Idea from Work-Family Balance to Work-Life Balance
- on yourself, to meet your own physical and emotional needs;
- on professional work, which is necessary to obtain funds to meet various needs (work is also a means of self-fulfillment);
- on family, as well as friends, other people with whom they have strong emotional connections; and
- on other people (e.g., through civic actions and for the broadly understood community).
2.2. Work-Life Enrichment—Experiences from One Role Improve the Quality of Life in the Other
3. Materials and Methods
3.1. Characteristics of the Research Group
3.2. Methodology for the Survey and Analysis
- What solutions for maintaining work-life balance are used in companies?
- What factors (organizational and individual benefits) determine the durability of solutions in the field of work-life balance?
- What forms of non-professional activity do the respondents pursue?
- Which areas of non-professional functioning are most disturbed by their professional work? Has it changed during the pandemic and how?
- What forms of support and solutions do employees expect from the employer to be able to fulfil themselves in their personal lives and develop professionally?
- What activities outside of work strengthen employees in their work and vice versa, what activities at work have a positive impact on their personal life?
4. Results
4.1. Work-Life Balance—What Companies Offer and What Employees Expect
4.2. The Areas of Non-Professional Functioning of Employees and Changes in this Regard Resulting from the COVID-19 Pandemic
4.3. Work-Life Enrichment—Mutual Positive Work-Life Relationships Perceived by Employees
5. Discussion and Conclusions
5.1. Theoretical Implications
5.2. Managerial Implications
5.3. Limitations and Directions for Future Research
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Katić, I.; Knežević, T.; Berber, N.; Ivanisevic, A.; Leber, M. The impact of stress on life, working, and management styles: How to make an organization healthier? Sustainability 2019, 11, 4026. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Ferreira, P.; Gabriel, C.; Faria, S.; Rodrigues, P.; Sousa Pereira, M. What if employees brought their life to work? The relation of life satisfaction and work engagement. Sustainability 2020, 12, 2743. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Gleick, J. Faster: The Acceleration of Just About Everything; Vintage Books: New York, NY, USA, 2000; ISBN-10: 9780679775485. [Google Scholar]
- Rose, J. Never enough hours in the day: Employed mothers’ perceptions of time pressure. Aust. J. Soc. Issues 2017, 52, 116–130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Troup, C.; Rose, J. Working from home: Do formal or informal telework arrangements provide better work-family outcomes? Community Work Fam. 2012, 15, 471–486. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- OECD. Better Life Index. Available online: http://www.oecdbetterlifeindex.org/countries/poland/ (accessed on 23 November 2020).
- Greenhaus, J.H.; Collins, K.M.; Show, J.D. The relation between work–family balance and quality of life. J. Vocat. Behav. 2003, 63, 510–531. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Greenhaus, J.H.; Parasuraman, S.; Collins, K.M. Career involvement and family involvement as moderators of relationship between work-family conflict and withdrawal from profession. J. Occup. Health Psychol. 2001, 6, 91–100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bennett, A.A.; Bakker, A.B.; Field, J.G. Recovery from work-related effort: A meta-analysis. J. Organ. Behav. 2018, 39, 262–275. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Firoozabadi, A.; Uitdewilligen, S.; Zijlstra, F.R.H. Should you switch off or stay engaged? The consequences of thinking about work on the trajectory of psychological well-being over time. J. Occup. Health. Psychol. 2018, 23, 278–288. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Kleine, A.K.; Rudolph, C.W.; Zacher, H. Thriving at Work: A Meta-Analysis. J. Organ. Behav. 2019, 40, 973–999. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Chan, X.W.; Kalliath, T.; Brough, P.; Oi-Ling, S.; O’Driscoll, M.P.; Timms, C. Work–family enrichment and satisfaction: The mediating role of self-efficacy and work-life balance. Int. J. Hum. Resour. Manag. 2016, 27, 1755–1776. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pedersen, V.B.; Jeppesen, H.J. Contagious flexibility? A study on whether schedule flexibility facilitates work-life enrichment. Scand. J. Psychol. 2012, 53, 347–359. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Harris, L.A.; Foster, B. The Drivers of Work–Life Balance: A Critical Review. In Proceedings of the 22nd Conference of the Association of Industrial Relations Academics of Australia and New Zealand, Melbourne, Australia, 6–8 February 2008. [Google Scholar]
- Clutterbuck, D. Managing Work-Life Balance; Chartered Institute of Personnel & Development: Wimbledon, UK, 2003; pp. 16–91. [Google Scholar]
- Kalliath, T.; Brough, P. Work-life balance: A review of the meaning of the balance construct. J. Manag. Organ. 2008, 14, 323–327. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kahn, R.L.; Wolfe, D.M.; Quinn, R.; Snoek, J.D.; Rosenthal, R.A. Organizational Stress: Studies in Role Conflict and Ambiguity; John Wiley & Sons: New York, NY, USA, 1964. [Google Scholar]
- Greenhaus, J.; Beutell, N. Sources of conflict between work and family roles. Acad. Manag. Rev. 1985, 10, 76–88. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gadeyne, N.; Verbruggen, M.; Delanoeije, J.; De Cooman, R. All wired, all tired? Work-related ICT-use outside work hours and work-to-home conflict: The role of integration preference, integration norms and work demands. J. Vocat. Behav. 2018, 107, 86–99. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Voydanoff, P. Toward a conceptualization of perceived work-family fit and balance: A demands and resources approach. J. Marriage Fam. 2005, 67, 822–836. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Voydanoff, P. The effects of work demands and resources on work-to-family conflict and facilitation. J. Marriage Fam. 2004, 66, 398–412. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wepfer, A.G.; Allen, T.D.; Brauchli, R.; Jenny, G.J.; Bauer, G.F. Work-life boundaries and well-being: Does work-to-life integration impair well-being through lack of recovery? J. Bus. Psychol. 2018, 33, 727–740. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Emslie, C.; Hunt, K. ‘Live to work’ or ‘Work to live’? A qualitative study of gender and work–life balance among men and women in mid-life. Gend. Work Organ. 2009, 16, 151–172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Keeney, J.; Boyd, E.M.; Sinha, R.; Westring, A.F.; Ryan, A.M. From “work–family” to “work–life”: Broadening our conceptualization and measurement. J. Vocat. Behav. 2013, 82, 221–237. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Thasni, A. Impact of work-life enrichment on organisational commitment and stress experiences: Mediating role of work-life balance. Int. J. Acad. Dev. 2017, 2, 1015–1019. [Google Scholar]
- Dex, S.; Smith, C.; Winter, S. Effects of Family-Friendly Policies on Business Performance; Research Papers in Management Studies, WP22; University of Cambridge: Cambridge, UK, 2001. [Google Scholar]
- Yasbek, P. The Business Case for Firm-Level Work Life Balance Policies: A Review of the Literature; Labour Market Policy Group: Wellington, New Zealand, 2004. [Google Scholar]
- Pavalko, E.K.; Henderson, K.A. Combining care work and paid work. Do workplace policies make a difference? Res. Aging 2006, 28, 359–374. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Lysova, E.I.; Allan, B.A.; Dik, B.J.; Duffy, R.D.; Steger, M.F. Fostering meaningful work in organizations: A multi-level review and integration. J. Vocat. Behav. 2019, 110, 374–389. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Giddens, A. Sociology; Polish Scientific Publishers PWN: Warsaw, Poland, 2004. [Google Scholar]
- Crouter, A.C. Spillover from family to work: The neglected side of the work-family interface. Hum. Relat. 1984, 37, 425–441. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Grzywacz, J.G. Work-family spillover and health during midlife: Is managing conflict everything? Am. J. Health Promot. 2000, 14, 236–243. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Sieber, S.D. Toward a theory of role accumulation. Am. Sociol. Rev. 1974, 39, 567–578. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Greenhaus, J.H.; Powell, G.N. When work and family are allies: A theory of work-family enrichment. Acad. Manag. Rev. 2006, 31, 72–92. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Carlson, D.S.; Kacmar, K.M.; Wayne, J.H.; Grzywacz, J.G. Measuring the positive side of the work-family interface: Development and validation of a work-family enrichment scale. J. Vocat. Behav. 2006, 68, 131–164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Russo, M.; Shteigman, A.; Carmeli, A. Workplace and family support and work-life balance: Implications for individual psychological availability. J. Posit. Psychol. 2016, 11, 173–188. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Stoddard, M.; Madsen, S.R. Toward an understanding of the link between work-family enrichment and individual health. JBAM 2007, 9, 2–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Staines, G.L. Spillover versus compensation: A review of the literature on the relationship between work and nonwork. Hum. Relat. 1980, 33, 111–129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kelly, C.M.; Strauss, K.; Greenhaus, J.H.; Powell, G.N. Enrichment across boundaries: New perspectives on the work-life interface. Acad. Manag. Annu. Meet. Proc. 2015, 1, 14225. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rubenstein, A.L.; Peltokorpi, V.; Allen, D.G. Work-home and home-work conflict and voluntary turnover: A conservation of resources explanation for contrasting moderation effects of on- and off-the-job embeddedness. J. Vocat. Behav. 2020, 119, 103413. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Powell, G.N.; Greenhaus, J.H.; Allen, T.D.; Johnson, R.E. Introduction to special topic forum: Advancing and expanding work-life theory from multiple perspectives. Acad. Manag. Rev. 2019, 44, 54–71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Henion, A.; Ryan, A.M. Wanted: A Life outside the Workplace. Available online: http://msutoday.msu.edu/news/2013/wanted-a-life-outside-the-workplace/ (accessed on 15 November 2020).
- Wayne, J.; Matthews, R.A.; Odle-Dusseau, H.; Casper, W.J. Fit of role involvement with values: Theoretical, conceptual, and psychometric development of work and family authenticity. J. Vocat. Behav. 2019, 115, 103317. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- McNall, L.A.; Nicklin, J.M.; Masuda, A.D. A meta-analytic review of the consequences associated with work-family enrichment. J. Bus. Psychol. 2010, 25, 381–396. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Clutterbuck, D. The HR guide to organisational change: Managing work-life balance. NHRD Netw. J. 2009, 2, 109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kvale, S. InterViews: An Introduction to Qualitative Research Interviewing; Sage Publications: Thousand Oaks, CA, USA, 1996; p. 88. [Google Scholar]
- Lofland, J.; Lofland, L.H. Analyzing Social Settings: A Guide to Qualitative Observation and Analysis, 3rd ed.; Wadsworth: Belmont, CA, USA, 1995; p. 188. [Google Scholar]
- Strauss, A.; Corbin, J. Basics of Qualitative Research: Grounded Theory Procedures and Techniques, 4th ed.; Sage Publications: Newbury Park, CA, USA, 1990; p. 62. [Google Scholar]
- Rosso, B.D.; Dekas, K.H.; Wrzesniewski, A. On the meaning of work: A theoretical integration and review. Res. Organ. Behav. 2010, 30, 91–127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bowins, B. Activity for Mental Health; Academic Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 2020; pp. 120–224. [Google Scholar]
- Cropanzano, R.; Wright, T. When a “happy” worker is really a “productive” worker: A review and further refinement of the happy-productive worker thesis. Consult. Psychol. J. 2001, 53, 182–199. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Oswald, A.J.; Proto, E.; Sgroi, D. Happiness and productivity. J. Labor Econ. 2015, 33, 789–822. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Mishra, P.; Bhatnagar, J.; Gupta, R.; MacDermid-Wadsworth, S. How work–family enrichment influence innovative work behavior: Role of psychological capital and supervisory support. J. Manag. Organ. 2019, 25, 58–80. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- DiNardi, G. Why You Should Work Less and Spend More Time on Hobbies. Harv. Bus. Rev. 2019. Available online: https://hbr.org/2019/02/why-you-should-work-less-and-spend-more-time-on-hobbies (accessed on 19 November 2020).
Position | Gender | Size of Entity | ||||
Managerial | Non-Managerial | Woman | Man | Large Company | Medium Company | Small Company |
27 | 7 | 25 | 9 | 28 | 3 | 3 |
Industry | ||||||
Trade | Media | Production | Public Sector | Services | Technology | |
1 | 1 | 5 | 5 | 17 | 5 |
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. |
© 2021 by the author. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Mikołajczyk, K. Sustainable Development of an Individual as a Result of Mutual Enrichment of Professional and Personal Life. Sustainability 2021, 13, 697. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13020697
Mikołajczyk K. Sustainable Development of an Individual as a Result of Mutual Enrichment of Professional and Personal Life. Sustainability. 2021; 13(2):697. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13020697
Chicago/Turabian StyleMikołajczyk, Katarzyna. 2021. "Sustainable Development of an Individual as a Result of Mutual Enrichment of Professional and Personal Life" Sustainability 13, no. 2: 697. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13020697
APA StyleMikołajczyk, K. (2021). Sustainable Development of an Individual as a Result of Mutual Enrichment of Professional and Personal Life. Sustainability, 13(2), 697. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13020697