Role of Islamic Banking during COVID-19 on Political and Financial Events: Application of Impulse Indicator Saturation

Abstract

This paper attempts to detect the unavoidable impacts of COVID-19 on geopolitical and financial events related to Islamic banking and the finance sector in Pakistan. It considers only those major events that triggered imbalances in the equity prices of selected Islamic banks. Employed here is the GARCH model, used to predict the volatility series using daily data from January 2007 to July 2020. The Impulse Indicator Saturation (IIS) helps to identify the structural breaks due to COVID-19, as well as the effects of political and financial events on the returns and volatility series of Islamic banks. The results indicate that all the events due to COVID-19 are significant. While 19 out of 21 political and financial events impacted the returns and volatility series, there were only 2 political events out of 18 that showed no significant effect on the returns and the volatility series. The state’s and Islamic banks’ policymakers can use these results to build an effective and sustainable financial policy regarding Islamic finance and the banking sector.

1. Introduction

It is well known that equity markets play a significant role in the economic progress of any country, particularly in advanced economies. An economy without an equity market cannot improve equity funding accessibility or attain a stable financial structure. The stock exchange offers companies the facility to increase capital for development through trading shares supplied to investors. When the investors invest their money in share-buying instead of saving, it leads to the wise use of assets. The reason for this is that the money that can be consumed is mobilized and conveyed to endorse business activity. On the other hand, it also brings about changes in all related sectors, such as industry, commerce, and agriculture, leading to economic growth and better efficiency and profitability for firms.

The current COVID-19 pandemic has severely affected the world economy. To mitigate the damage done by this unsuspected crisis, the cost of the total bailout of the world’s economies has been estimated at no less than USD 5 trillion, injected as a liquidity booster [1]. It is projected that the potential consequences of this pandemic are far larger than any past crisis [2]. This calls for new research and well-coordinated policy action in response to associated economic circumstances [3]. Following World War II, the unemployment rate increased by almost 2% because of recession [4,5]. The ongoing COVID-19 crisis appears to have had a far worse impact, derailing the usual patterns of demand and supply, and policy tools (particularly in less developed and developing nations) have been designed to combat the economic consequences [6]. However, few studies have discussed the means to tackle the current crisis, which calls for new policy tools [7]. The conventional financial system was previously devastated by a far less severe financial crisis in 2007–2008 (the Global Financial Crisis). It is no wonder that the economy is grossly impacted now, and requires a rescue plan [8]. In this context, the financial system could be harnessed to tackle the ongoing crisis [8,9].

A bank plays the role of a mediator between the saver and investor [10]. The banking sector is well-established in Pakistan, and it contributes to almost three-fourths of the total finance industry [11,12]. According to [13], the banking sector in Pakistan grew rapidly from the 1990s. Similar to the banks in any other developed country, Pakistani banks provide an extensive range of facilities to its customers, such as online banking and online billing, and they are now an intrinsic part of Pakistan’s economy. In Pakistan, the stock exchange capitalization of Islamic banks represents a major portion of total market capitalization, i.e., about PKR 2482 billion in June 2018. In Pakistan, 21 Islamic banks are operating, but only 5 are full-fledged Islamic institutions, and the remaining 16 are standalone branches of Islamic and conventional banks. In total, two Islamic banks are listed on the KSE 100. Islamic banking’s net investment increased by 4.8% and reached PKR 529 billion (USD 43.5 million) in June 2018. The breakup of the net investment among pure Islamic banks and the Islamic branches of conventional banks grew by PKR 9 billion (USD 7.3 million) in June 2018. The Pakistan Stock Exchange approved the quotation and listing of two open-ended mutual funds, i.e., the AKD Islamic Income Fund and the AKD Islamic Stock Fund, in June 2018 [14].

Since it is now clear that Islamic banks contribute a large proportion to the PSX, it is evident that any fluctuations in the PSX also affects the Islamic banking sector. Many studies carried out in Pakistan depict the effects of political and social events on its stock market [15,16,17]. Different studies have explored the effects of financial events on the Pakistani Stock Market [18]. Many studies have examined the impact of terrorism, and salient economic and political events, on the Pakistani stock exchange. Investigators have mostly analyzed the influence of financial events on Pakistan’s stock exchange volatility, particularly the occurrence of domestic and extraneous financial shocks [11,18,19].

The figures mentioned above show that the Islamic banking sector contributes a significant portion to the PSX, which means that any financial and political shock in the PSX can also affect the Islamic banking sector. Numerous studies have looked at the influence of political events on the Pakistani stock market [17,18,20,21,22,23]. Furthermore, these sorts of studies have explored the effects of a financial event on the Pakistan stock exchange’s performance. Most studies evaluated the impact of financial events on stock exchange volatility in the presence of domestic and foreign financial shocks [18,19].

No such study has yet analyzed the impact of COVID-19-related political and financial events on Islamic banks’ returns and the volatility of Islamic banks’ stock prices. We use Impulse Indicator Saturation rather than the GARCH model to detect structural breaks that have not been explored before. Therefore, this study’s main objective is to assess the impact of selected political, financial, and COVID-19-related events on the financial series of Islamic banks in Pakistan. The current study also models the volatility of Islamic bank stock prices. This study selects two major Islamic banks, which are on the highly ranked and reputable index KSE 100 of the Pakistan stock exchange (PSX): Bank Islamic Pakistan Limited (BIPL) and Meezan Bank Limited (MEBL). Not only are the selected events up to date, but the current data (in the ongoing pandemic) also add to the novelty of this study. The findings could offer answers to current policy needs. Studies have been published on political structure, but their focus is merely on changes in government. This study is unique in that it explores the impacts of COVID-19 and political and financial events on Islamic banking. The literature predicting the impact of political events on the stock market of Pakistan include [18,23]. However, they address selected events and are limited in nature. Few studies also predict relationships with financial events. Refs. [24,25,26,27] highlighted the effect of the GFC on stock market indices. However, none of these studies delve into the aftermath of the GFC in the Islamic banking sector. Moreover, the literature lacks data on the fluctuations in the exchange rate and on COVID-19. We must try to resolve the above-mentioned shortcomings, and in this way contribute to the literature.

2. Literature Review

This section reviews previous studies related to this topic and methodology. Moreover, empirical studies on the impact of political, financial, and COVID-19-related events on Islamic banks’ stock prices and volatilities are discussed. It is projected that the potential consequences of the coronavirus pandemic are much worse than any other worldwide disaster [2]. Several studies have been published on the effects of political or election-related events on stock prices. Most of them used US data and the patterns of that country’s presidential elections. For instance, Refs. [28,29,30,31,32,33] favor the election cycle in the context of returns. Ref. [34] noted the effects of American and Canadian government changes on the Canadian stock market. Moreover, Ref. [35] supports the transnational effect of US elections on the stock market indexes of 18 countries. In 2000, Ref [36] found the effects of election outcomes on 33 countries’ stock markets. Some exceptions also exist, but overall, the effects are mixed. Other studies have also shown that the return on stock is more evident under Republican governments [32,37] and there is not much evidence for the contrary. Ref. [30] claimed that returns do not vary much among Republican and Democrat governments. Ref. [29] also supported Huang’s results.

The literature is scarce on the impacts on Islamic banking, especially in the context of the government system (democratic or autocratic). Most governments these days comprise coalitions. A government based on a coalition is not stable, and it may be replaced by a regime that was not elected. Questions arise as to whether these changes affect stock in the same way as government changes through by-elections. Evaluating political risk is challenging, although the events that generate political risk are easy to recognize [38,39,40]. Several terminologies are used to address political risk in the literature. Political risk, political instability, and political uncertainty are the most common terminologies. Unexpected changes in tax rules, election results, government policies, international or domestic conflicts, institutional instability, etc., all denote political risk [41]. We claim in this research that political risk evaluations must have the ability to predict returns.

Following [42], this study relies on a subjective assessment of the political risk posed to Pakistan’s Islamic banks’ returns. Different political measures have been used previously in the economic and financial literature, i.e., election uncertainty [39,43,44], domestic conflict [45,46], social instability [47], corruption [48,49,50], political unrest [51,52,53], and institutional instability [54].

Political risk has been explored in several studies [40,42,55,56,57,58]. They used a form of political risk that comprises 12 indicators, including external conflicts, government stability, ethnic tensions, internal conflicts, socioeconomic conditions, law and order, military involvement in politics, investment profile, religious tensions, bureaucracy quality, corruption, and democratic accountability. Banks’ assets are made volatile due to political risk through two channels. Capital cost is considered the first channel. Several studies argue that political risk affects the volatility of a firm’s equity [30,55,59,60,61,62,63]. As political risk increases, the cost of capital is used as a discount factor in the firm valuation model. We claim that political instability affects firms’ cash flows because it elevates the level of uncertainty surrounding the realization of projects’ cash flows and their recovery.

In the financial literature, the COVID-19 pandemic’s impacts are frequently compared with the GFC of over a decade ago, which is broadly address in research on interconnectedness, septicity, and the spillover effect [64,65,66,67,68]. Ref. [20] explored the impact of COVID-19 on stock and commodity markets’ stability, and its effect on the food markets in Bangladesh [69]. However, the earlier Global Financial Crisis caused plenty of problems in the economies, whereas in the COVID-19 pandemic, one unique disaster is apparent. Government restrictions and actions were introduced as an instant response to the COVID-19 contagion because politicians had to act quickly to stop the spread. Ref. [70] identified the difference between COVID-19 and the GFC in that the pandemic crisis was the “Great Compression”.

3. Methodology and Model Specifications

This section describes the empirical analysis of volatility modeling and traces the impact of political and financial events on Islamic banks’ returns and volatility series. The selected Islamic banks are listed on the KSE 100 index. The stock price series of the banks have an ARCH effect employed for volatility series, and we used GARCH modeling. Because the basic assumption of the OLS model is the homogeneity of variances, when the variance is dependent on time, we cannot use the OLS model. That is why for volatility series, we used GARCH modeling. The GARCH model is an extension of the ARCH model, which is used to avoid the lag length problem of the latter. We used the Impulse Indicator Saturation (IIS) technique to detect the impact of political and financial events on Islamic banks’ returns and volatility series. This procedure is used by some researchers for the detection of structural breaks.

3.1. Model Specifications

The raw financial series mostly show a stochastic trend. For this reason, it is not possible to estimate valid results from the time series when there is a stochastic trend through GARCH modeling. On the other hand, when series have an ARCH effect, the heteroscedasticity can be reduced by taking the log. That is why this study makes returns series using the following formula:

$${\mathrm{R}}_{\mathrm{t}}=\log \left(\frac{{\mathrm{l}}_{\mathrm{t}}}{{\mathrm{l}}_{\mathrm{t}-1}}\right)$$

(1)

${\mathrm{l}}_{\mathrm{t}}$ The current price, i.e., the stock price at t time and the ${\mathrm{l}}_{\mathrm{t}-1}$ lag price of the series.

3.1.1. ARCH Model

To model the time series when the variance changes with time, [71] introduced the ARCH model. The ARCH model simultaneously estimates two equations: the conditional mean equation, which evaluates the data-generating process of returns, commonly through the ARMA process, and the conditional variance equation, which estimates the data-generating method of variance based on the squared lag value of the residual. The general forms of the ARCH model equations are written below:

Conditional mean

$${\mathrm{R}}_{\mathrm{t}}={\mathsf{\delta }}_0+{\mathsf{\delta }}_1{\mathrm{M}}_{\mathrm{t}}+{\mathsf{\epsilon }}_{\mathrm{t}}$$

(2)

where ${\mathsf{\epsilon }}_{\mathrm{t}}={\mathrm{z}}_{\mathrm{t}}{\mathsf{\sigma }}_{\mathrm{t}},{ \mathrm{z}}_{\mathrm{t}}~\mathrm{N}\left(0,1\right)$

Conditional variance

$${\mathsf{\sigma }}_{\mathrm{t}}^2={\mathsf{\tau }}_0+{\sum }_{\mathrm{i}=1}^{\mathrm{q}}{\mathsf{\tau }}_{\mathrm{i}}{\mathsf{\epsilon }}_{\mathrm{t}-\mathrm{i}}^2+{\mathrm{v}}_{\mathrm{t}}$$

(3)

where $\mathrm{i}$ = 1, 2, …, q.

R_t is the presentation of the return series, while ${\mathsf{\delta }}_1$ directs the parameter vector of the ARMA (p, q) process. The ${\mathsf{\delta }}_1{\mathrm{M}}_{\mathrm{t}}$ the term is the general form of the ARMA (p, q) process. This process can be ARMA (0, 0) in some scenarios. There are some assumptions made by the ARCH model; the parameters of the conditional variance equation must come up with a positive sign. The ARCH model only captures a symmetric effect in the returns. ${\mathsf{\epsilon }}_{\mathrm{t}}$ is the error term whereas the term ${\mathsf{\epsilon }}_{\mathrm{t}-\mathrm{i}}^2$ is known as the ARCH effect.

3.1.2. GARCH Model

The problem with the ARCH model is the long lag length of the ARCH process, which reduces the degree of freedom. To overcome this problem, Ref. [72] introduced a valuable extension of the ARCH model, which is known as the Generalized Autoregressive Conditional Heteroscedastic (GARCH) model. To tackle this problem, the lag value of the conditional variance equation was introduced in the conditional variance equation as an independent variable. Ref. [27] employed GARCH modeling to model the stock indices of Pakistani and foreign stock markets.

The general forms of the equations of the GARCH (p, q) model are given below:

Conditional mean

$${\mathrm{R}}_{\mathrm{t}}={\mathsf{\delta }}_0+{\mathsf{\delta }}_1{\mathrm{M}}_{\mathrm{t}}+{\mathsf{\epsilon }}_{\mathrm{t}}$$

(4)

where ${\mathsf{\epsilon }}_{\mathrm{t}}={\mathrm{z}}_{\mathrm{t}}{\mathsf{\sigma }}_{\mathrm{t}},{ \mathrm{z}}_{\mathrm{t}}~\mathrm{N}\left(0,1\right)$

Conditional variance

$${\mathsf{\sigma }}_{\mathrm{t}}^2={\mathsf{\tau }}_0+{\sum }_{\mathrm{i}=1}^{\mathrm{q}}{\mathsf{\tau }}_{\mathrm{i}}{\mathsf{\epsilon }}_{\mathrm{t}-\mathrm{i}}^2+{\sum }_{\mathrm{j}=1}^{\mathrm{p}}{\theta }_{\mathrm{j}}{\mathsf{\sigma }}_{\mathrm{t}-\mathrm{j}}^2+{\mathrm{v}}_{\mathrm{t}}$$

(5)

R_t is the presentation of the return series and ${\mathsf{\delta }}_1$ directs the parameter vector of the ARMA (p, q) process. The ${\mathsf{\delta }}_1{\mathrm{M}}_{\mathrm{t}}$ term is the general form of the ARMA (p, q) process. This process is ARMA (0, 0) in some scenarios. There are some assumptions made by the ARCH model; the parameters of the conditional variance equation must come up with a positive sign, while the ARCH model only captures a symmetric effect in the returns. The ${\mathsf{\epsilon }}_{\mathrm{t}}$ is the error term, ${\mathsf{\epsilon }}_{\mathrm{t}-\mathrm{i}}^2$ is the ARCH term and ${\theta }_{\mathrm{j}}$ is the parameter of the lag value of conditional variance.

3.1.3. Impulse Indicator Saturation (IIS)

The Impulse Indicator Saturation (IIS) process was devised by [73]. The purpose of this process is to detect the shift in the intercept, co-breaks, breaks and multiple breaks. This process is unrestricted and general, and that is why it is also known as an unrestricted model (GUM). The IIS procedure checks the break on each point of the data. A dummy variable is generated against each value in the data to capture the effects of events or breaks. There is a general rule in econometrics that the number of estimated parameters must be smaller than the number of observations. This procedure deals with this rule by introducing a specific number of dummy variables and runs regression; after that it runs the second regression with the next dummies, and so on. In this way, the regression analysis remains unviolated. The break could be significant on a different level of significance, and that is why we can set a specific level of significance according to our objective. We use the Impulse Indicator Saturation (IIS) technique to estimate the effects of political and financial events on the Islamic banks that are listed on the KSE 100 index.

The data from January 2007 to July 2020 are used, and the total number of observations is 2968. We set the criteria to introduce 250 dummies in one regression, and then the IIS runs 12 regressions. The generalized form of regression is written as follows:

$${\mathrm{R}}_{\mathrm{it}}={\pi }_0+{\pi }_1{\mathrm{R}}_{\mathrm{it}-1}+{\displaystyle \sum }_{{\mathrm{t}}_1=1}^{250}{\mathsf{\tau }}_{\mathrm{t}}{\mathrm{B}}_{\mathrm{it}}+{\mathsf{\epsilon }}_{\mathrm{it}}$$

(6)

${\mathsf{\epsilon }}_{\mathrm{i}\mathrm{t}} ~ \mathrm{IIN}(0,{ \mathsf{\sigma }}_{\mathrm{t}}^2)$ t₁ = 1, 2, …, 250

$${\mathrm{R}}_{\mathrm{i}\mathrm{t}}={\pi }_0+{\pi }_1{\mathrm{R}}_{\mathrm{it}-1}+{\displaystyle \sum }_{{\mathrm{t}}_1=251}^{500}{\mathsf{\tau }}_{{\mathrm{t}}_2}{\mathrm{B}}_{\mathrm{i}\mathrm{t}}+{\mathsf{\epsilon }}_{\mathrm{it}}$$

(7)

${\mathsf{\epsilon }}_{\mathrm{it}} ~ \mathrm{IIN}(0,{ \mathsf{\sigma }}_{\mathrm{t}}^2)$ t₂ = 251, 252, …, 500

$${\mathrm{R}}_{\mathrm{it}}={\pi }_0+{\pi }_1{\mathrm{R}}_{\mathrm{it}-1}+{\displaystyle \sum }_{{\mathrm{t}}_{12}=2501}^{2968}{\mathsf{\tau }}_{{\mathrm{t}}_{12}}{\mathrm{B}}_{\mathrm{i}\mathrm{t}}+{\mathsf{\epsilon }}_{\mathrm{i}\mathrm{t}}$$

(8)

${\mathsf{\epsilon }}_{\mathrm{i}\mathrm{t}} ~ \mathrm{IIN}(0, {\mathsf{\sigma }}_{\mathrm{t}}^2)$ t₁₂ = 2501, …, 2968

3.2. Methodology

Data visualization is employed to understand the nature and behavior of the return time series. The descriptive statistics explain the essential characteristics of the returns series of Islamic banks. A GARCH type model is used to model the volatility of Islamic banks’ stock prices. In the end, the IIS procedure is adopted to check the impact of political and financial events on Islamic banks’ returns and volatility series. For details of events, see Appendix A (

Table A1. Events and their sources.

Dates	Category	Detail	Source
14 November 2007	Internal Affairs	Ban on TV channels	https://www.dawn.com/news/275656/tv-channels-abiding-by-code-to-go-on-air (accessed on 9 April 2018)
19 February 2008	Elections	Pakistan People’s Party won with a 1/3 majority	https://www.dawn.com/news/290178/ppp-pml-n-in-sight-of-magical-number (accessed on 9 April 2018)
15 May 2008	Internal Affairs	Strike for Chief Justice Movement	https://www.hrw.org/report/2007/12/18/destroying-legality/pakistans-crackdown-lawyers-and-judges (accessed on 9 April 2018)
7 September 2008	Financial crisis	Global Financial Crisis	https://www.ipripak.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/01/art5usmw10.pdf (accessed on 9 April 2018)
11 March 2009	Internal Affairs	Long March/Riots	https://www.dawn.com/news/630027/fallout-from-the-2009-long-march (accessed on 9 April 2018)
10 June 2010	Internal Affairs	Punjab Government Opposed Rah-e-Najaat Operation	https://defence.pk/pdf/threads/operation-rah-e-nijat-south-waziristan.36574/page-59 (accessed on 9 April 2018)
2 May 2011	Foreign Affairs	Osama Bin Laden operation in Abbottabad	https://tribune.com.pk/story/160560/the-operation-what-exactly-happened-in-abbottabad (accessed on 9 April 2018)
28 October 2011	Long March/Political Gathering	Political gathering by Pakistan Muslim League Nawaz (PML-N)	https://www.pakistantoday.com.pk/2011/12/14/ppp-grills-pml-n-over-maryam-nawaz%E2%80%99s-political-launch/ (accessed on 9 April 2018)
31 October 2011	Political Gathering	Political gathering by Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf	https://tribune.com.pk/story/285058/pti-rally-in-lahore-live-updates (accessed on 9 April 2018)
18 June 2012	Internal Affairs	Supreme Court dismissed Yousef Raza Gillani	https://www.theguardian.com/world/2012/jun/19/pakistan-prime-minister-yousuf-gilani-disqualified (accessed on 9 April 2018)
15 January 2013	Long March/Political Gathering	Tahir-ul-Qadri protest in Islamabad resulting from the long march	https://www.dawn.com/news/779452/talks-between-govt-qadri-concluded-successfully (accessed on 9 April 2018)
13 May 2013	Elections	New Government by PML-N	https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2013/5/13/sharif-assembling-new-pakistan-government (accessed on 9 April 2018)
5 June 2013	Internal Affairs	Nawaz Sharif took oath as the Prime Minister of Pakistan	https://www.bbc.com/news/world-asia-22767734 (accessed on 9 April 2018)
15 August 2014	Long March/Political Gathering	Protest by Pakistan Awami Tehreek (PAT) and PTI	https://www.dawn.com/news/1125710 (accessed on 9 April 2018)
19 August 2014	Internal Affairs	Civil disobedience by Imran Khan	https://www.dawn.com/news/1133132 (accessed on 9 April 2018)
20 February 2018	Internal Affairs	Supreme Court dismissed Nawaz Sharif on corruption charges	https://www.cnbc.com/2018/04/13/pakistan-disqualifies-former-prime-minister-nawaz-sharif-from-holding-office.html (accessed on 9 April 2018)
13 July 2018	Internal Affairs	Mariam Nawaz and Nawaz Sharif arrested	https://www.dawn.com/news/1419756 (accessed on 9 April 2018)
25 July 2018	Internal Affairs	2018 general election	https://www.ecp.gov.pk/frmPartyDetails.aspx?EleId=1&EID=10070&constType=NA&Election=General%20Election%2025%20Jul%202018 (accessed on 9 April 2018)
26 July 2018	Internal Affairs	PTI made a new government	https://www.dawn.com/news/1423370 (accessed on 9 April 2018)
9 October 2018	Exchange rate	Depreciation of Pakistani Rupee against US Dollar from 122.44 to 132.58	https://tradingeconomics.com/pakistan/currency (accessed on 9 April 2018)
30 November 2018	Exchange rate	Further depreciation of Pakistani Rupee against US Dollar from132 to 136.58	https://profit.pakistantoday.com.pk/2019/06/14/rupee-tumbles-down-to-154-against-the-dollar/ (accessed on 9 April 2018)
19 March 2020	First outbreak of COVID-19	The first outbreak in Pakistan of COVID-19 between 11 and 19 March	https://www.loc.gov/law/foreign-news/article/pakistan-smart-lockdown-imposed-across-cities-of-pakistan-as-COVID-19-cases-grow-rapidly/ (accessed on 9 April 2018)
23 March 2020	First lockdown in Karachi due to COVID-19	First lockdown in Karachi and the Pakistan stock market also shut down due to COVID-19	https://www.crisisgroup.org/asia/south-asia/pakistan/b162-pakistans-COVID-19-crisis (accessed on 9 April 2018)
31 May 2020	Nationwide lockdown due to COVID-19	Nationwide lockdown in Pakistan due to COVID-19	https://www.crisisgroup.org/asia/south-asia/pakistan/b162-pakistans-COVID-19-crisis (accessed on 9 April 2018)

).

4. Results and Discussion

4.1. Data Visualization

In this section, we visualize the series and their characteristics, which provides us with a basic understanding of the nature and behavior of the series.

Figure 1 shows that the stock price series of both banks are, overall, moving upward, or have an upward trend with some fluctuations.

These fluctuations emerged due to some external and internal shocks, which made the series volatile.

Figure 2 displays the returns series of BIPL and MEPL banks. It shows the dispersion of return from the mean value, which is sometimes also known as volatility. There are some circles that explain the low volatility and high volatility clustering. The dashed-line circles show the high-volatility clustering, and plain-line circles indicate low-volatility clustering. These clustering points also suggest the presence of the ARCH effect.

Figure 3 shows the ACF and PACF of the return’s series of BIPL banks. The ACF explains the autoregressive behavior of BIPL, which means the lag of effects for the current value, and PACF outlines the moving average, which highlights the lag variation effect. The red line shows the ACF, and blue indicates the PACF.

The bar outside the lines is the significant lag value. The figure reveals that only the first three lags are outside the lines. For convenience, the figure is made solely for BIPL, but it can be made for other bank return series.

Figure 4 shows the distribution of the returns of Bank Islamic (BIPL), showing that the distribution has a large tail when compared to the normal distribution. In this figure, the red line shows the actual distribution of returns and the green line indicates the normal distribution. It means that the distribution is not symmetric. The peak of the distribution is also higher than the normal distribution, which means that the distribution is leptokurtic.

4.2. Descriptive Statistics

The descriptive statistics provide initial statistics on the nature and characteristics of the data series. The summary of statistics is given below in

Table 1. The descriptive statistics of BIPL and MEBL.

	Summary of Statistics
Series	Mean	Std. Error	Skewness	Jarque–Bera	Excess Kurtosis	Q Stat (5)	Q2-Stat (5)	ARCH 1-2	KPSS
BIPL	0.00005	0.03257	0.47269 (0.0000)	1502.3 (0.0021)	3.3812 (0.0000)	20.1270 (0.0011)	393.971 (0.0000)	63.815 (0.0000)	0.11966
MEBL	0.00051	0.02448	−0.2617 (0.0000)	1741.9 (0.0000)	3.7441 (0.0000)	39.9162 (0.0000)	90.8753 (0.0000)	31.168 (0.0000)	0.12908
Null Hypotheses KPSS H0: Return series is level stationary, asymptotic significant values 1% (0.739), 5% (0.463), 10% (0.347). Q stat (return series): there is no serial autocorrelation. Q2-stat (square return series) H0: there is no serial autocorrelation. Jarque–Bera H0: distribution of series is normal. LM-ARCH H0: there is no ARCH effect. Use the asymptotic significance values of t-stat 1% (0.01), 5% (0.05), 10% (0.1) and compare these critical values with p-values (Probability values). p-values are in the parenthesis”.

.

Table 1 describes the results of the summarized statistics. The mean value indicates the average value of the series, which shows that on average the returns are close to zero. This means the returns series follows a mean reversion behavior. The standard deviation explains the deviation from the mean value, and the variation of both series from the mean is not too high. The skewness explains the symmetry of the distribution, and in both cases the skewness values are significant; this means both series are asymmetric, while the BIPL distribution is positively tailed and the distribution of MEBL is negatively skewed. The JB is the test of normality with a null hypothesis that the distribution is normal. The statistics of JB show that the distribution is not normal because it rejects the null hypothesis. The excess kurtosis indicates that the distribution does not have a normal peak; it is higher than the average level, and that is why it is leptokurtic. The Q stat explains that the returns have an autoregressive behavior.

In contrast, the Q square statistic reveals that the returns square, which is equal to the variance, also exhibits autoregressive behavior. The ARCH effect test explains that the returns series have an ARCH effect, and the KPSS test shows that both returns series are stationary.

4.3. Volatility Modeling

The objective of this study to check the impact of political and financial events on the returns and volatility of Islamic banks. So, to find the volatility series, we employ GARCH modeling. The volatility series are generated through the conditional variance equation—the results of GARCH modeling are given below in

Table 2. The volatility modeling of return series of BIPL.

Parameters	Coefficient	Std. Error		t-Value		t-Prob
Conditional Mean Equation
Constant ${\theta }_0$	−0.0014	0.0001		−0.4852		0.6276
AR (1) ${\vartheta }_1$	0.4365 ***	0.1081		4.0370		0.0001
MA (1) ${\varnothing }_1$	−0.5944 ***	0.0973		−6.1120		0.0000
Conditional Variance Equation
Constant ${\mathsf{\gamma }}_0$	−0.0027	0.0002		−0.5387		0.5901
ARCH (1) ${\mathsf{\gamma }}_1$	0.4055 ***	0.1915		2.1170		0.0343
GARCH (1) ${\mathsf{\delta }}_1$	0.7813 ***	0.0584		13.3700		0.0000
Student (DF)	2.9999 ***	0.3811		7.8710		0.0000
Persistence of shock	0.9990
Null Hypotheses AR (p) H0: ${\vartheta }_i$ = 0 No AR Process, MA (q) H0: ${\varnothing }_i$ = 0 No MA Process, ARCH H0: ${\theta }_i$ = 0 No ARCH effect, GARCH H0: ${\phi }_i$ = 0 No GARCH effect. The *, ** and *** are showing the significance at 10%, 5% and 1% respectively.
Residual Analysis
Tests	Jarque–Bera	Q Stat (5)	Q Stat (10)	Q2 Stat (5)	Q2 Stat (10)	LM ARCH (1-2)	LM ARCH (1-5)
Values	8.4392 *** (0.0000)	1.0853 (0.1653)	0.2386 (0.8375)	0.5632 (0.4382)	0.3187 (0.4386)	0.6538 (0.9140)	0.4370 (0.5821)
Null Hypotheses In the Q stat (return series) there is no serial autocorrelation. Q2 stat (square return series) H0: there is no serial autocorrelation. Jarque–Bera H0: distribution of series is normal. LM-ARCH H0: there is no ARCH effect. p-values are in the parenthesis.

and

Table 3. The volatility modeling of return series of MEBL.

Parameters	Coefficient	Std. Error		t-Value		t-Prob
Conditional Mean Equation
Constant ${\theta }_0$	0.0001	0.0003		0.3784		0.7052
AR (1) ${\vartheta }_1$	0.0747 ***	0.0767		0.9744		0.0300
MA (1) ${\varnothing }_1$	−0.2789 ***	0.0731		−3.8140		0.0001
Conditional Variance Equation
Constant ${\mathsf{\gamma }}_0$	0.8525 ***	0.2732		3.1200		0.0018
ARCH (1) ${\mathsf{\gamma }}_1$	0.3319 ***	0.0605		5.4820		0.0000
GARCH (1) ${\mathsf{\delta }}_1$	0.5954 ***	0.0760		7.8380		0.0000
Student (DF)	4.2501 ***	0.4087		10.4000		0.0000
Persistence of shock	0.92725
Null Hypotheses AR (p) H0: ${\vartheta }_i$ = 0 No AR Process, MA (q) H0: ${\varnothing }_i$ = 0 No MA Process, ARCH H0: ${\theta }_i$ = 0 No ARCH effect, GARCH H0: ${\phi }_i$= 0 No GARCH effect. The *, ** and *** show significance at 10%, 5% and 1%, respectively.
Residual Analysis
Tests	Jarque–Bera	Q Stat (5)	Q Stat (10)	Q2 Stat (5)	Q2 Stat (10)	LM ARCH (1-2)	LM ARCH (1-5)
Values	19.7562 *** (0.0000)	1.6892 (0.26982)	0.9874 (0.2037)	0.9851 (0.7822)	0.8371 (0.7239)	0.7312 (0.2464)	0.8748 (0.8371)
Null Hypotheses In the Q stat (return series) there is no serial autocorrelation. Q2 stat (square return series) H0: there is no serial autocorrelation. Jarque–Bera H0: distribution of series is normal. LM-ARCH H0: there is no ARCH effect. p-values are in the parentheses.

. Table 2 explains the results of the GARCH model of BIPL. The first panel of Table 2 explains that the ${\vartheta }_1$ autoregressive parameter is significant. The ${\varnothing }_1$ is the parameter of the moving average, which is also significant. This means that the returns of BIPL follow the ARMA (1, 1) process. The second panel of Table 2 shows the results of the conditional variance equation of the GARCH model.

The ARCH term coefficient ${\mathsf{\gamma }}_1$ is significant, meaning there is an ARCH that effects the conditional variance of BIPL. The coefficient of the GARCH term ${\mathsf{\delta }}_1$ is also significant. This means that the conditional variance is also following the GARCH (1, 1) specification. The Student-t term is substantial, and this means it follows the t distribution. The persistence of shock is close to 1, which shows that the ARCH and GARCH effects take a long time to decay.

The third panel of Table 2 describes the results of the residual analysis, which validates the results of the regression. The Jarque–Bera (JB) is the test of normality, with a null hypothesis that the distribution is normal. The statistics of JB show that the distribution is not normal because it rejects the null hypothesis. The normality of the residual is not necessary for the validation of results. The Q stat explains that the residuals have an autoregressive behavior. In contrast, the Q square stat shows that the square of the residuals, which is equal to the variance, also has a autoregressive behavior. The statistics of the test show that they are insignificant, which means that there is no more autocorrelation and heteroscedasticity. The ARCH test explains that the residuals have no ARCH effect.

Table 3 describes the results of the volatility modeling of MEBL. The first panel in this table shows that the ${\vartheta }_1$ autoregressive parameter is significant in the conditional mean equation. The ${\varnothing }_1$ is the parameter of the moving average, and it is also significant. This means that the returns of MEBL follow the ARMA (1, 1) process. The second panel of Table 2 displays the results of the conditional variance equation of the volatility modelling of MEBL. The ARCH term coefficient ${\mathsf{\gamma }}_1$ is statistically significant, which shows that there is an ARCH effect that affects the conditional variance of MEBL. The coefficient of the GARCH term ${\mathsf{\delta }}_1$ emerges as significant. This means that the conditional variance follows GARCH (1, 1) specification. The Student-t term is significant, which means that it follows the t distribution. The persistence of shock is close to 1, confirming that the ARCH and GARCH effects take a long time to decay.

4.4. The Impact of Political and Financial Events on BIPL and MEBL Returns and Volatility Series

The Impulse Indicator Saturation procedure is used to check the significance of these COVID-19 pandemic-related political and financial events for the returns and volatility of BIPL and MEBL. The major 24 events have been selected, and the results of their impact on return series are given below in

Table 4. The impact on returns of BIPL and MEBL.

Date	Category	Detail	BIPL (F-Stat)	MEBL (F-Stat)
14 November 2007	Internal Affair	Ban on TV channels going to air	1.8742 (0.2835)	0.4991 (0.3759)
19 February 2008	Elections	PPP won with a 1/3 majority	11.7542 *** (0.0007)	16.9443 *** (0.0001)
15 May 2008	Internal Affair	Strike for Justice Movement	82.7620 *** (0.0043)	72.7621 *** (0.0092)
7 September 2008	Financial crisis	Global Financial Crisis	57.8313 *** (0.0000)	9.7822 *** (0.0000)
11 March 09	Internal Affair	Long March/Riots	34.8653 *** (0.0000)	23.3945 *** (0.0000)
10 June 2010	Internal Affairs	Punjab Government Opposed Rah e Najat Operation (PGOp)	0.7218 (0.4968)	2.1362 (0.3949)
2 May 2011	Foreign Affairs	Osama Bin Laden operation in Abbottabad	46.8434 * (0.0748)	39.9853 * (0.0517)
28 October 2011	Long March/Political Gathering	PML-N	76.7522 *** (0.0000)	85.7642 *** (0.0000)
31 October 2011	Long March/Political Gathering	PTI	21.7842 *** (0.0000)	48.7638 *** (0.0000)
18 June 2012	Internal Affairs	SC dismissed Yousaf Raza Gillani	87.9472 *** (0.0000)	34.4074 *** (0.0000)
15 January 2013	Long March/Political Gathering	Tahir ul Qadri sit-in in Islamabad resulted from the long march	62.7492 *** (0.0000)	72.7842 *** (0.0000)
13 May 2013	Elections	PMLN won	65.7462 *** (0.0000)	23.4982 *** (0.0000)
5 June 2013	Internal Affair	NS the PM of Pakistan	3.8364 (0.2621)	3.7821 (0.4580)
15 August 2014	Long March/Political Gathering	PAT and PTI	49.4952 *** (0.0000)	63.9848 *** (0.0000)
19 August 2014	Internal Affairs	Civil disobdience encouraged by Imran khan	4.4023 * (0.0654)	3.6482 * (0.0721)
20 February 2018	Internal Affairs	SC dismissed Nawaz Sharif	47.8031 *** (0.0000)	24.7492 *** (0.0000)
13 July 2018	Internal Affairs	Mariam Nawaz and Nawaz Sharif arrested	12.2693 *** (0.0000)	23.7592 *** (0.0000)
25 July 2018	Internal Affairs	2018 general election	19.9824 *** (0.0000)	54.8132 *** (0.0000)
26 July 2018	Internal Affairs	PTI won	4.4369 * (0.0729)	5.8426 * (0.0821)
9 October 2018	Exchange rate	Increased 122.44 to 132.58	43.4958 *** (0.0054)	62.8642 *** (0.0049)
30 November 2018	Exchange rate	Increased 132 to 136.58	37.8419 ** (0.0159)	26.9352 ** (0.0421)
19 March 2020	First outbreak of COVID-19	The first outbreak in Pakistan of COVID-19 between 11 and 19 March	67.2511 *** (0.0000)	35.9473 *** (0.0000)
23 March 2020	First lockdown in Karachi due to COVID-19	First lockdown in Karachi and also Pakistan stock market shut down due to COVID-19	37.2943 *** (0.0000)	49.4822 *** (0.0000)
31 May 2020	Nationwide lock down due to COVID-19	Nationwide lockdown in Pakistan due to COVID-19	19.3831 *** (0.0000)	28.3612 *** (0.0000)

The *, ** and *** are showing the significance at 10%, 5% and 1% respectively.

.

The results documented in Table 4 show that all political and financial events affect the performance of BIPL and MEBL. The results reveal the significant impact of all political and financial events on the returns of BIPL and MEBL, except the ban on TV channels going to air on 14 November 2007, and the PGOp of 14 November 2007 and also on the 10 June 2010. Some events had only a minor impact on the returns of BIPL and MEBL. These events are not significant at the 5% level, but they are significant at 10%; for example, the Osama Bin Laden Operation in Abbottabad and the civil disobedience campaign by Imran Khan on 2 May 2011 and 19 August 2014. While all three events during the unavoidable COVID-19 pandemic were highly significant, this means they had a momentous effect on the volatility and returns of Islamic banks.

Table 5. The impact on volatility of BIPL and MEBL.

Date	Category	Detail	BIPL (F-Stat)	MEBL (F-Stat)
14 November 2007	Internal Affairs	Ban on TV channels going to air	2.8329 (0.6392)	0.3791 (0.6920)
19 February 2008	Elections	PPP won with a 1/3 majority	14.4297 *** (0.0000)	27.9312 *** (0.0000)
15 May 2008	Internal Affairs	Strike for Justice Movement	63.4783 *** (0.0004)	49.3849 *** (0.0018)
7 September 2008	Financial crisis	Global Financial Crisis	57.6492 *** (0.0000)	56.3821 *** (0.0000)
11 Mar 2009	Internal Affairs	Long March/Riots	49.3871 *** (0.0000)	37.3923 *** (0.0000)
10 June 2010	Internal Affairs	Punjab Government Opposed Rah e Najat Operation (PGOp)	0.3293 (0.1522)	1.3739 (0.3949)
2 May 2011	Foreign Affairs	Osama Bin Laden operation in Abbottabad	5.3901 * (0.0561)	9.6948 * (0.0849)
28 October 2011	Long March/Political Gathering	PML-N	62.7823 *** (0.0000)	38.3981 *** (0.0000)
31 October 2011	Long March/Political Gathering	PTI	32.4629 *** (0.0000)	24.4821 *** (0.0000)
18 June 2012	Internal Affairs	SC dismissed Yousaf Raza Gillani	21.3031 *** (0.0000)	35.3309 *** (0.0000)
15 January 2013	Long March/Political Gathering	Tahir ul Qadri sit-in in Islamabad resulted from the long march	42.3916 (0.0000)	19.1093 (0.0000)
13 May 2013	Elections	PMLN won	65.7462 *** (0.0000)	23.4982 *** (0.0000)
5 June 2013	Internal Affairs	NS the PM of Pakistan	5.8749 * (0.0872)	4.3782 * (0.0749)
15 August 2014	Long March/Political Gathering	PAT and PTI	83.3879 *** (0.0000)	92.4829 *** (0.0000)
19 August 2014	Internal Affairs	Civil disobdience encouraged by Imran Khan	8.3783 * (0.0629)	3.3982 * (0.0932)
20 February 2018	Internal Affairs	SC dismissed Nawaz Sharif	72.8992 *** (0.0000)	31.4872 *** (0.0000)
13 July 2018	Internal Affairs	Mariam Nawaz and Nawaz Sharif arrested	46.7322 *** (0.0000)	64.4762 *** (0.0000)
25 July 2018	Internal Affairs	2018 general eclection	46.4581 *** (0.0002)	32.4892 *** (0.0000)
26 July 2018	Internal Affairs	PTI won	6.3893 * (0.0519)	8.4873 * (0.0621)
9 October 2018	Exchange rate	Increased 122.44 to 132.58	42.4934 *** (0.0000)	37.4213 *** (0.0000)
30 November 2018	Exchange rate	Increased 132 to 136.58	42.3091 *** (0.0047)	34.8423 ** (0.0124)
19 March 2020	First outbreak of COVID-19	The first outbreak in Pakistan of COVID-19 between 11 and 19 March	27.3462 *** (0.0000)	64.2190 *** (0.0000)
23 March 2020	First lockdown in Karachi due to COVID-19	First lockdown in Karachi and the Pakistan stock market also shut down due to COVID-19	31.4924 *** (0.0000)	19.4822 *** (0.0000)
31 May 2020	Nationwide lockdown due to COVID-19	Nationwide lockdown in Pakistan due to COVID-19	29.3822 *** (0.0047)	64.3712 *** (0.0023)

The *, ** and *** are showing the significance at 10%, 5% and 1% respectively.

lists the results of volatility series.

The results in Table 5 lead to the conclusion that all the political and financial events affected the performance of BIPL and MEBL. There was a significant impact of all the political and financial events on the volatility of BIPL and MEBL, except the ban on TV channels going to air on 14 November 2007 and the PGOp of 10 June 2010. There are some events that weakly impacted the volatility of BIPL and MEBL, and these were not significant at the 5% level, yet they were at the 10% level: the Osama Bin Laden Operation in Abbottabad, the civil disobedience campaign by Imran Khan, and PTI winning the general election on 2 May 2011, 19 August 2014 and 26 July 2018. The overall results indicate that the political and financial events affected the returns and volatilities of Islamic banks listed on the KSE 100. There are only two political events that did not shape the returns and volatility: firstly, the ban on TV channels going to air and the PGOp of 14 November 2007 and 10 June 2010, respectively. All three events, occurring due to COVID-19, were highly significant and had a huge impact on the returns and volatility series.

5. Conclusions and Policy Discussion

The stock markets play a critical role in any economy. The stability of an economy is also based on the performance of the stock market. The Islamic banking sector in the stock market of Pakistan has revealed its importance over time. However, when any shock hits the stock market, its effect is also seen in the stock prices of all the sectors listed on the Pakistan stock exchange. We selected some major political and financial events and explored their impact on the performance of Islamic banks listed on the KSE 100 index.

The returns series and volatility series of BIPL and MEBL were impacted by 19 out of 21 events. The returns series and volatility series of BIPL and MEBL were impacted by all internal and external financial events. The political events that did not affect the return and volatility of Islamic banks were the ban on TV channels going to air and the PGOp on the 14 November 2007 and 10 June 2010, respectively. The financial events that did not affect the returns and volatility of Islamic banks are the ban on TV channels going to air and the PGOp on 14 November 2007 and 10 June 2010, respectively. Some political events weakly affected the returns and volatility of Islamic banks: the Osama Bin Laden Operation in Abbottabad and PTI winning the elections on 2 May 2011 and 26 July 2018, respectively. All three events occurring due to COVID-19 turned out to be highly significant. They had a huge impact on returns and volatility series. The conclusion can be drawn that COVID-19 and political and financial events affected the performance of the Islamic banking sector in all but two cases.

The results could provide direction for the Central Bank of Pakistan, regarding how Islamic banks should develop and implement policy when political and financial events occur. The Islamic banks can use the results of this study to make policies regarding stock market shares. Finally, the Islamic banks can use these results for future policy-making when such political and financial events emerge.