Private Sector Engagement in the Self-Governance of Urban Sustainable Infrastructure: A Study on Alternative Fueling Infrastructure in the United States
Abstract
:1. Introduction
2. Urban Infrastructure and Private Sector Participation
3. Context: Clean Cities Program
4. Hypotheses: Self-Governance of Alternative Fueling Infrastructure
5. Data, Measures and Methods
6. Results
7. Discussion
8. Conclusions
Funding
Data Availability Statement
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of Interest
Appendix A
Variable | Mean | SD | Min | Max | Observations | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Privately-owned alt. fuel stations | overall | 0.9855 | 3.7012 | 0 | 75 | N = 11,964 |
between | 2.6018 | 0 | 24.9166 | n = 997 | ||
within | 2.6335 | −20.9311 | 53.6522 | T = 12 | ||
Utility-owned alt. fuel stations | overall | 0.1147 | 0.7154 | 0 | 20 | N = 11,964 |
between | 0.5105 | 0 | 6.8333 | n = 997 | ||
within | 0.5105 | −5.7187 | 13.2813 | T = 12 | ||
Public-owned alt. fuel stations | overall | 0.4093 | 1.7842 | 0 | 42 | N = 11,964 |
between | 1.4310 | 0 | 17.1666 | n = 997 | ||
within | 1.0665 | −13.7574 | 25.2426 | T = 12 | ||
Clean Cities coalitions dummy | overall | 0.4432 | 0.4968 | 0 | 1 | N = 11,964 |
between | 0.4903 | 0 | 1 | n = 997 | ||
within | 0.0816 | −0.3901 | 1.2764 | T = 12 | ||
Incentive: loans | overall | 0.0889 | 0.3001 | 0 | 2 | N = 11,964 |
between | 0.1724 | 0 | 0.5 | n = 997 | ||
within | 0.2457 | −0.4110 | 1.8389 | T = 12 | ||
Incentive: rebate | overall | 0.0316 | 0.1991 | 0 | 2 | N = 11,964 |
between | 0.1321 | 0 | 0.5833 | n = 997 | ||
within | 0.1490 | −0.5517 | 1.4482 | T = 12 | ||
Incentive: tax credit | overall | 0.2052 | 0.4818 | 0 | 2 | N = 11,964 |
between | 0.3845 | 0 | 1.1666 | n = 997 | ||
within | 0.2906 | −0.9614 | 1.0385 | T = 12 | ||
Incentive: grant | overall | 0.3438 | 0.6083 | 0 | 2 | N = 11,964 |
between | 0.4920 | 0 | 1.75 | n = 997 | ||
within | 0.3581 | −1.4062 | 1.5104 | T = 12 | ||
Total debt outstanding | overall | 258,157.4 | 909,080.7 | 0 | 17,500,000 | N = 7090 |
between | 701,342.6 | 0 | 13,900,000 | n = 977 | ||
within | 196,368.3 | −4,162,831 | 3,841,913 | T-bar = 7.25691 | ||
High fleet use industry | overall | 12.9384 | 47.3818 | 0 | 1647 | N = 11,964 |
between | 46.5690 | 0 | 1153.083 | n = 997 | ||
within | 8.8519 | −368.145 | 506.8551 | T = 12 | ||
Sustainable power generation facilities | overall | 0.2609 | 0.9489 | 0 | 20 | N = 11,964 |
between | 0.7892 | 0 | 9.4167 | n = 997 | ||
within | 0.5273 | −8.1558 | 10.8442 | T = 12 | ||
Median household income | overall | 43,776.06 | 11,111.72 | 17,843 | 109,926 | N = 11,964 |
between | 10,543.41 | 22,809.5 | 98,969.08 | n = 997 | ||
within | 3522.638 | 24,183.4 | 66,225.31 | T = 12 | ||
Population | overall | 10.6684 | 1.4918 | 6.4409 | 15.4744 | N = 11,964 |
between | 1.4920 | 6.5110 | 15.4662 | n = 997 | ||
within | 0.0371 | 10.2362 | 11.00055 | T = 12 | ||
Average price of primary fuels | overall | 10.6025 | 1.9556 | 7.4 | 17.72 | N = 11,964 |
between | 1.4206 | 8.8891 | 14.09 | n = 997 | ||
within | 1.3447 | 7.6424 | 14.6391 | T = 12 | ||
Carbon dioxide emission | overall | 294.9203 | 189.5735 | 34.12 | 649.59 | N = 11,964 |
between | 188.9022 | 37.9291 | 607.8992 | n = 997 | ||
within | 16.9376 | 237.1311 | 336.6111 | T = 12 | ||
Year | overall | 2009.5 | 3.4521 | 2004 | 2015 | N = 11,964 |
between | 0 | 2009.5 | 2009.5 | n = 997 | ||
within | 3.4521 | 2004 | 2015 | T = 12 |
State | Number of Coalitions | Region | Counties | With Coalitions | No Coalitions |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
California | 14 | Southwest | 58 | 25 | 33 |
Texas | 10 | South Central | 246 | 41 | 205 |
New York | 7 | Northeast | 62 | 40 | 22 |
Connecticut | 6 | Northeast | 8 | 5 | 3 |
Florida | 5 | Southeast | 67 | 24 | 43 |
Colorado | 3 | Northwest | 64 | 63 | 1 |
Illinois | 3 | North Central | 102 | 5 | 97 |
Louisiana | 3 | South Central | 60 | 49 | 11 |
Michigan | 3 | North Central | 83 | 8 | 75 |
North Carolina | 3 | Southeast | 98 | 22 | 76 |
Ohio | 3 | Mid-Atlantic | 85 | 81 | 4 |
Tennessee | 3 | Southeast | 90 | 85 | 5 |
DV: Number of Utility Owned Alt. Fuel Stations | |||
---|---|---|---|
(1) | (2) | (3) | |
Clean Cities coalitions dummy | 2.4816 *** | 1.8446 ** | 1.9157 *** |
(0.7079) | (0.4809) | (0.4128) | |
Incentive: loans | 1.5620 *** | 1.9407 *** | |
(0.1606) | (0.2920) | ||
Incentive: rebate | 0.1850 *** | 0.1660 *** | |
(0.0293) | (0.0295) | ||
Incentive: tax credit | 0.5009 *** | 0.4296 *** | |
(0.1086) | (0.1067) | ||
Incentive: grant | 1.3107 | 1.3646 | |
(0.2467) | (0.2887) | ||
Total debt outstanding | 1.0000 | ||
(0.0000) | |||
High fleet use industry | 1.0001 | ||
(0.0004) | |||
Sustainable power generation facilities | 0.9503 ** | ||
(0.0191) | |||
Median household income | 1.0000 *** | ||
(0.0000) | |||
Population | 6.8543 | ||
(8.9496) | |||
Average price of primary fuels | 0.8996 | ||
(0.0622) | |||
Carbon dioxide emission | 0.9811 ** | ||
(0.0080) | |||
Year fixed effects | Yes | Yes | Yes |
Observations | 1296 | 1296 | 1154 |
Number of county | 108 | 108 | 102 |
Pseudo likelihood | −978.4315 | −881.2763 | −799.4 |
Wald Chi test | 214.1387 | 464.9518 | 1341 |
Prob > Chi2 | 0.0000 | 0.0000 | 0 |
References
- G7. G7 Climate and Environment Ministers’ Meeting; G7: London, UK, 2021; p. 27. [Google Scholar]
- Koppenjan, J.; Enserink, B. Public–Private Partnerships in Urban Infrastructures: Reconciling Private Sector Participation and Sustainability. Public Adm. Rev. 2009, 69, 284–296. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- EPA. Fast Facts: U.S. Transportation Sector Greenhouse Gas Emissions, 1990–2019; Office of Transportation and Air Quality: Washington DC, USA, 2021.
- U.S. Department of Transportation; U.S. Department of Energy; U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Effects of the Alternative Motor Fuels Act CAFE Incentives Policy; National Highway Traffic Safety Administration: Washington, DC, USA, 2002.
- Eurocities Clean and Active Mobility. Eurocities; Eurocities Clean and Active Mobility: Brussels, Belgium, 2021. [Google Scholar]
- Alternative Fuels Data Center: National Alternative Fuels Corridors. Available online: https://afdc.energy.gov/laws/11675 (accessed on 21 September 2021).
- Gearhart, C.; Gonder, J.; Markel, T. Connectivity and Convergence: Transportation for the 21st Century. IEEE Electrif. Mag. 2014, 2, 6–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bhattacharyay, B.N. Seamless Sustainable Transport Connectivity in Asia and the Pacific: Prospects and Challenges. Int. Econ. Econ. Policy 2012, 9, 147–189. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sarkar, R.; Ward, J. DOE SMART Mobility: Systems and Modeling for Accelerated Research in Transportation. In Road Vehicle Automation 3; Meyer, G., Beiker, S., Eds.; Lecture Notes in Mobility; Springer International Publishing: Cham, Switzerland, 2016; pp. 39–52. ISBN 978-3-319-40503-2. [Google Scholar]
- Melaina, M.; Muratori, M.; McLaren, J.; Schwabe, P. Investing in Alternative Fuel Infrastructure: Insights for California from Stakeholder Interviews: Preprint; National Renewable Energy Lab: Washington, DC, USA, 2017; p. 16.
- Sagalyn, L.B. Explaining the Improbable Local Redevelopment in the Wake of Federal Cutbacks. J. Am. Plan. Assoc. 1990, 56, 429–441. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sagalyn, L.B. Public/Private Development: Lessons from History, Research, and Practice. J. Am. Plan. Assoc. 2007, 73, 7–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Miralinaghi, M.; de Almeida Correia, G.H.; Seilabi, S.E.; Labi, S. Designing a Network of Electric Charging Stations to Mitigate Vehicle Emissions. In Proceedings of the 2020 Forum on Integrated and Sustainable Transportation Systems (FISTS), Delft, The Netherlands, 3–5 November 2020; pp. 95–100. [Google Scholar]
- Fang, Y.; Wei, W.; Mei, S.; Chen, L.; Zhang, X.; Huang, S. Promoting Electric Vehicle Charging Infrastructure Considering Policy Incentives and User Preferences: An Evolutionary Game Model in a Small-World Network. J. Clean. Prod. 2020, 258, 120753. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yang, T.; Long, R.; Li, W. Suggestion on Tax Policy for Promoting the PPP Projects of Charging Infrastructure in China. J. Clean. Prod. 2018, 174, 133–138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wirges, J. Planning the Charging Infrastructure for Electric Vehicles in Cities and Regions. Available online: https://publikationen.bibliothek.kit.edu/1000053253 (accessed on 19 May 2021).
- US EPA. Carbon Pollution from Transportation. Available online: https://www.epa.gov/transportation-air-pollution-and-climate-change/carbon-pollution-transportation (accessed on 27 October 2021).
- Dutta, S.; Rao, H.; Vasi, I.B. Plug Power. Social Movements and Electric Vehicle Charging Stations in California, 1995–2012. In Social Movements, Stakeholders and Non-Market Strategy; Briscoe, F., King, B.G., Leitzinger, J., Eds.; Research in the Sociology of Organizations; Emerald Publishing Limited: Bingley, UK, 2018; Volume 56, pp. 21–52. ISBN 978-1-78754-349-2. [Google Scholar]
- Brown, A.; Lommele, S.; Eger, R.; Schayowitz, A. Evolution of Plug-In Electric Vehicle Charging Infrastructure in the United States: Preprint; National Renewable Energy Laboratory: Golden, CO, USA, 2020.
- Apostolou, D.; Xydis, G. A Literature Review on Hydrogen Refuelling Stations and Infrastructure. Current Status and Future Prospects. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2019, 113, 109292. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Victor, D. Deep Decarbonization: A Realistic Way Forward on Climate Change. Available online: https://e360.yale.edu/features/deep-decarbonization-a-realistic-way-forward-on-climate-change (accessed on 21 September 2021).
- Alternative Fuels Data Center: Alternative Fueling Infrastructure Incentive. Available online: https://afdc.energy.gov/laws/6024 (accessed on 16 December 2020).
- Scott, T. Does Collaboration Make Any Difference? Linking Collaborative Governance to Environmental Outcomes. J. Policy Anal. Manag. 2015, 34, 537–566. [Google Scholar]
- Arimura, T.H.; Darnall, N.; Katayama, H. Is ISO 14001 a Gateway to More Advanced Voluntary Action? The Case of Green Supply Chain Management. J. Environ. Econ. Manag. 2011, 61, 170–182. [Google Scholar]
- Tan, J.; Zhao, J.Z. The Rise of Public–Private Partnerships in China: An Effective Financing Approach for Infrastructure Investment? Public Adm. Rev. 2019, 79, 514–518. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Carmin, J.; Darnall, N.; Mil-Homens, J. Stakeholder Involvement in the Design of U.S. Voluntary Environmental Programs: Does Sponsorship Matter? Policy Stud. J. 2003, 31, 527–543. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Darnall, N.; Sides, S. Assessing the Performance of Voluntary Environmental Programs: Does Certification Matter? Policy Stud. J. 2008, 36, 95–117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Prakash, A.; Potoski, M. Collective Action through Voluntary Environmental Programs: A Club Theory Perspective. Policy Stud. J. 2007, 35, 773–792. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lim, S.; Prakash, A. Voluntary Regulations and Innovation: The Case of ISO 14001. Public Adm. Rev. 2014, 74, 233–244. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ostrom, E. Self-Governance and Forest Resources; Center for International Forestry Research: Bogor, Indonesia, 1999. [Google Scholar]
- Sørensen, E.; Triantafillou, P. The Politics of Self-Governance; Ashgate Publishing, Ltd.: Farnham, UK, 2013; ISBN 1-4094-9917-0. [Google Scholar]
- Wang, Y.; Zhao, Z.J. Performance of Public–Private Partnerships and the Influence of Contractual Arrangements. Public Perform. Manag. Rev. 2018, 41, 177–200. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fiack, D.; Kamieniecki, S. Stakeholder Engagement in Climate Change Policymaking in American Cities. J. Environ. Stud. Sci. 2017, 7, 127–140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Copulos, M.R. Economic, Security and Environmental Impacts of Alternative Fuel and Automotive Technologies A Cost/Benefit Analysis of the Clean Cities Program; The National Defense Council Foundation: Washington, DC, USA, 2005. [Google Scholar]
- DOE Clean Cities Coalition Network: A National Network of Local Coalitions. Available online: https://cleancities.energy.gov/coalitions/ (accessed on 27 August 2020).
- Agranoff, R.; McGuire, M. Collaborative Public Management: New Strategies for Local Governments; Georgetown University Press: Washington, DC, USA, 2003; ISBN 1-58901-018-3. [Google Scholar]
- Ansell, C.; Gash, A. Collaborative Governance in Theory and Practice. J. Public Adm. Res. Theory 2007, 18, 543–571. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Emerson, K.; Nabatchi, T.; Balogh, S. An Integrative Framework for Collaborative Governance. J. Public Adm. Res. Theory 2012, 22, 1–29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Emerson, K.; Nabatchi, T. Evaluating the Productivity of Collaborative Governance Regimes: A Performance Matrix. Public Perform. Manag. Rev. 2015, 38, 717–747. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Provan, K.G.; Milward, H.B. A Preliminary Theory of Interorganizational Network Effectiveness: A Comparative Study of Four Community Mental Health Systems. Adm. Sci. Q. 1995, 1–33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ostrom, E. Governing the Commons: The Evolution of Institutions for Collective Action; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK, 1990; ISBN 0-521-40599-8. [Google Scholar]
- Shrestha, M.K. Self-Organizing Network Capital and the Success of Collaborative Public Programs. J. Public Adm. Res. Theory 2013, 23, 307–329. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lubell, M.; Schneider, M.; Scholz, J.T.; Mete, M. Watershed Partnerships and the Emergence of Collective Action Institutions. Am. J. Political Sci. 2002, 46, 148–163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lubell, M.; Mewhirter, J.M.; Berardo, R.; Scholz, J.T. Transaction Costs and the Perceived Effectiveness of Complex Institutional Systems. Public Adm. Rev. 2017, 77, 668–680. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Feiock, R.C.; Scholz, J.T. Self-Organizing Governance of Institutional Collective Action Dilemmas: An Overview. In Self-Organizing Federalism; Feiock, R.C., Scholz, J.T., Eds.; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK, 2009; pp. 3–32. ISBN 978-0-511-64231-9. [Google Scholar]
- Berardo, R.; Scholz, J.T. Self-Organizing Policy Networks: Risk, Partner Selection, and Cooperation in Estuaries: Self-Organizing Policy Networks. Am. J. Political Sci. 2010, 54, 632–649. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ostrom, E. Doing institutional analysis digging deeper than markets and hierarchies. In Handbook of New Institutional Economics; Springer: Berlin, Germany, 2005; pp. 819–848. [Google Scholar]
- Bryson, J.M.; Crosby, B.C.; Stone, M.M. Designing and Implementing Cross-Sector Collaborations: Needed and Challenging. Public Adm. Rev. 2015, 75, 647–663. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lubell, M. Collaborative Watershed Management: A View from the Grassroots. Policy Stud. J. 2004, 32, 341–361. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Thomas, C.W.; Koontz, T.M. Research Designs for Evaluating the Impact of Community-Based Management on Natural Resource Conservation. J. Nat. Resour. Policy Res. 2011, 3, 97–111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lubell, M.; Fulton, A. Local Policy Networks and Agricultural Watershed Management. J. Public Adm. Res. Theory 2007, 18, 673–696. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Schneider, A.; Ingram, H. Behavioral Assumptions of Policy Tools. J. Politics 1990, 52, 510–529. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Salamon, L.M.; Lund, M.S. The Tools Approach: Basic Analytics. Beyond Priv. Tools Gov. Action 1989, 23–50. [Google Scholar]
- Hall, D.; Lutsey, N. Emerging Best Practices for Electric Vehicle Charging Infrastructure; International Council on Clean Transportation (ICCT): Washington, DC, USA, 2017. [Google Scholar]
- Corts, K.S. Building out Alternative Fuel Retail Infrastructure: Government Fleet Spillovers in E85. J. Environ. Econ. Manag. 2010, 59, 219–234. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Hawkins, C.V.; Krause, R.M.; Feiock, R.C.; Curley, C. Making Meaningful Commitments: Accounting for Variation in Cities’ Investments of Staff and Fiscal Resources to Sustainability. Urban Stud. 2016, 53, 1902–1924. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lubell, M.; Feiock, R.; Handy, S. City Adoption of Environmentally Sustainable Policies in California’s Central Valley. J. Am. Plan. Assoc. 2009, 75, 293–308. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cameron, A.C.; Trivedi, P.K. Regression Analysis of Count Data; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK, 2013; Volume 53, ISBN 1-107-71779-5. [Google Scholar]
- Guimaraes, P. The Fixed Effects Negative Binomial Model Revisited. Econ. Lett. 2008, 99, 63–66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wooldridge, J.M. Distribution-Free Estimation of Some Nonlinear Panel Data Models. J. Econom. 1999, 90, 77–97. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- AFDC Alternative Fuels Data Center: Examples of Utility-Related Laws and Incentives. Available online: https://afdc.energy.gov/laws/utility-examples (accessed on 27 October 2021).
- Collantes, G.; Melaina, M. The Co-Evolution of Alternative Fuel Infrastructure and Vehicles: A Study of the Experience of Argentina with Compressed Natural Gas. Energy Policy 2011, 39, 664–675. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Deslatte, A.; Stokan, E. Hierarchies of Need in Sustainable Development: A Resource Dependence Approach for Local Governance. Urban Aff. Rev. 2019, 55, 1125–1152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hsu, C.-W.; Fingerman, K. Public Electric Vehicle Charger Access Disparities across Race and Income in California. Transp. Policy 2021, 100, 59–67. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Portney, K.E.; Cuttler, Z. The Local Nonprofit Sector and the Pursuit of Sustainability in American Cities: A Preliminary Exploration. Local Environ. 2010, 15, 323–339. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Provan, K.G.; Milward, H.B. Do Networks Really Work? A Framework for Evaluating Public-sector Organizational Networks. Public Adm. Rev. 2001, 61, 414–423. [Google Scholar]
- Ostrom, E. Crossing the Great Divide: Coproduction, Synergy, and Development. World Dev. 1996, 24, 1073–1087. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Feiock, R.C.; Portney, K.E.; Bae, J.; Berry, J.M. Governing Local Sustainability: Agency Venues and Business Group Access. Urban Aff. Rev. 2014, 50, 157–179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhao, J.; Melaina, M.W. Transition to Hydrogen-Based Transportation in China: Lessons Learned from Alternative Fuel Vehicle Programs in the United States and China. Energy Policy 2006, 34, 1299–1309. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gouchoe, S.; Everette, V.; Haynes, R. Case Studies on the Effectiveness of State Financial Incentives for Renewable Energy; National Renewable Energy Lab: Golden, CO, USA, 2002.
- Hsueh, L.; Darnall, N. Alternative and Nonregulatory Approaches to Environmental Governance. J. Public Adm. Res. Theory 2017, 1–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shrestha, M.K. Internal versus External Social Capital and the Success of Community Initiatives: A Case of Self-Organizing Collaborative Governance in Nepal. Public Adm. Rev. 2013, 73, 154–164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Whetsell, T.A.; Siciliano, M.D.; Witkowski, K.G.K.; Leiblein, M.J. Government as Network Catalyst: Accelerating Self-Organization in a Strategic Industry. J. Public Adm. Res. Theory 2020, 30, 448–464. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Meyer, P.E.; Winebrake, J.J. Modeling Technology Diffusion of Complementary Goods: The Case of Hydrogen Vehicles and Refueling Infrastructure. Technovation 2009, 29, 77–91. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Measurement | |
---|---|
Dependent variable | |
Privately-owned alternative fueling infrastructure | Number of privately-owned alternative fuel stations in the county |
Independent variables | |
Clean Cities | Clean cities operating in each county (yes = 1) |
Incentive system: Laws and incentives | Annual number of incentive systems of loan, rebate, grant and tax credit: State-level incentives that are given to alternative fueling infrastructure |
Control Variables | |
Industry density: regional concentration of industry with high car-fleet usage | Number of enterprises in industries with high volume of fleet usages in one county NAICS 48411: General Freight Trucking, local |
Main energy resource price | The average price of main energy resource at state |
Energy-related carbon dioxide emissions | Energy-related carbon dioxide emissions at state level |
Sustainable electric power generation facilities | Number of hydroelectric, solar, wind, geothermal, biomass electric power generation facilities (NAICS 221111, 221114, 221115, 221116, 221117) at county level |
Total debt outstanding | Amount of total debt outstanding, 1000 USD |
Household income | Median household income at county level |
Population | Population at county level |
N | Mean | SD | Min | Max | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Clean Cities | 11,964 | 0.4433 | 0.4970 | 0 | 1 |
Privately owned stations | 11,964 | 0.9855 | 3.7012 | 0 | 75 |
Incentive: loans | 11,964 | 0.0889 | 0.3001 | 0 | 2 |
Incentive: rebate | 11,964 | 0.0316 | 0.1991 | 0 | 2 |
Incentive: grant | 11,964 | 0.3438 | 0.6083 | 0 | 2 |
Incentive: tax | 11,964 | 0.2052 | 0.4818 | 0 | 2 |
Median household income | 11,964 | 43,776.06 | 11,111.72 | 17,843 | 109,926 |
Population | 11,964 | 10.6684 | 1.4918 | 6.440947 | 15.47445 |
Average price of primary fuels | 11,964 | 10.6025 | 1.9556 | 7.4 | 17.72 |
High fleet use industry | 11,964 | 12.9384 | 47.3818 | 0 | 1647 |
Sustainable power generation facilities | 11,964 | 0.2609 | 0.9489 | 0 | 20 |
Carbon dioxide emission | 11,964 | 294.9203 | 189.5735 | 34.12 | 649.59 |
Total debt outstanding | 7090 | 258,157.4 | 909,080.7 | 0 | 17,500,000 |
Year | 11,964 | 2009.5 | 3.4522 | 2004 | 2015 |
State | 2004 | 2005 | 2006 | 2007 | 2008 | 2009 | 2010 | 2011 | 2012 | 2013 | 2014 | 2015 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
California | 52 | 55 | 62 | 63 | 82 | 102 | 117 | 263 | 319 | 410 | 478 | 697 |
Colorado | 4 | 5 | 6 | 22 | 36 | 43 | 46 | 52 | 92 | 110 | 137 | 172 |
Connecticut | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 4 | 10 | 50 | 77 | 90 | 118 | 131 |
Florida | 0 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 4 | 10 | 59 | 133 | 158 | 183 | 249 |
Illinois | 9 | 31 | 47 | 58 | 71 | 81 | 86 | 108 | 196 | 225 | 255 | 292 |
Louisiana | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 33 | 37 | 42 | 46 |
Michigan | 2 | 5 | 20 | 38 | 50 | 69 | 80 | 116 | 146 | 183 | 231 | 276 |
North Carolina | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 9 | 24 | 38 | 121 | 133 | 161 | 178 | 209 |
New York | 2 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 12 | 31 | 94 | 105 | 129 | 166 |
Ohio | 3 | 4 | 12 | 36 | 47 | 50 | 53 | 76 | 144 | 169 | 226 | 272 |
Tennessee | 1 | 1 | 3 | 10 | 14 | 17 | 28 | 77 | 85 | 93 | 103 | 119 |
Texas | 8 | 11 | 18 | 27 | 28 | 32 | 44 | 115 | 155 | 174 | 226 | 302 |
DV: Number of Privately Owned Alt. Fuel Stations | |||
---|---|---|---|
(1) | (2) | (3) | |
Clean Cities coalitions dummy | 1.3566 ** | 1.3186 ** | 1.2847 * |
(0.1970) | (0.1817) | (0.1831) | |
Incentive: loans | 1.0720 | 1.1228 ** | |
(0.0600) | (0.0611) | ||
Incentive: rebate | 0.9328 | 0.8452 | |
(0.1043) | (0.0956) | ||
Incentive: tax credit | 1.0127 | 1.1362 * | |
(0.0677) | (0.0817) | ||
Incentive: grant | 0.8452 *** | 0.7974 *** | |
(0.0497) | (0.0564) | ||
Total debt outstanding | 1.0000 * | ||
(0.0000) | |||
High fleet use industry | 0.9999 | ||
(0.0002) | |||
Sustainable power generation facilities | 1.0111 | ||
(0.0107) | |||
Median household income | 1.0000 *** | ||
(0.0000) | |||
Population | 5.9139 | ||
(6.4451) | |||
Average price of primary fuels | 1.067 ** | ||
(0.0328) | |||
Carbon dioxide emission | 0.9990 | ||
(0.0019) | |||
Year fixed effects | Yes | Yes | Yes |
Observations | 5364 | 5364 | 3959 |
Number of county | 447 | 447 | 381 |
Pseudo likelihood | −4455 | −4444 | −3546 |
Wald Chi2 | 1936 | 2539 | 3248 |
Prob > Chi2 | 0.0000 | 0.0000 | 0.0000 |
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. |
© 2021 by the author. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Lee, H. Private Sector Engagement in the Self-Governance of Urban Sustainable Infrastructure: A Study on Alternative Fueling Infrastructure in the United States. Sustainability 2021, 13, 12435. https://doi.org/10.3390/su132212435
Lee H. Private Sector Engagement in the Self-Governance of Urban Sustainable Infrastructure: A Study on Alternative Fueling Infrastructure in the United States. Sustainability. 2021; 13(22):12435. https://doi.org/10.3390/su132212435
Chicago/Turabian StyleLee, Heewon. 2021. "Private Sector Engagement in the Self-Governance of Urban Sustainable Infrastructure: A Study on Alternative Fueling Infrastructure in the United States" Sustainability 13, no. 22: 12435. https://doi.org/10.3390/su132212435
APA StyleLee, H. (2021). Private Sector Engagement in the Self-Governance of Urban Sustainable Infrastructure: A Study on Alternative Fueling Infrastructure in the United States. Sustainability, 13(22), 12435. https://doi.org/10.3390/su132212435