Analyzing a Decade of Wind Turbine Accident News with Topic Modeling
Abstract
:1. Introduction
2. Literature Review
2.1. Individual Wind Turbine Accidents and Failures
2.2. General Overview of Accidents and Risk Analysis
2.2.1. Analyzing Risks without Analyzing Statistics on Multiple Accidents
2.2.2. Statistics on Accidents
2.2.3. Statistics on a Single Type of Accident or Single-Cause Category
2.3. Mechatronics for Maintenance and Monitoring
2.3.1. General Health of the Wind Turbine
2.3.2. Monitoring Specific Modes of Failure
2.4. Application of Advanced Data Analytics Methods
2.4.1. Monitoring and Component Failure Prediction
2.4.2. Other Applications of Advanced Analytics
2.5. Health Impact
3. Methodology
3.1. Data Analytics
3.2. Machine Learning
3.3. Text Analytics
3.4. Tabular Analysis
3.5. Word Cloud
3.6. Topic Modeling
3.7. Association Mining
3.8. Decision Tree Analysis
4. Developed Framework
4.1. Data Collection and Preparation
4.2. Tabular and Visual Analysis
4.3. Text Processing
4.4. Text Visualization
4.5. Topic Modeling
4.6. Association Mining
4.7. Decision Tree Analysis
4.8. Predictive Analytics
5. Data
5.1. Data Collection and Data Cleaning
5.2. Data Attributes
- ID: Unique identifier for each accident;
- Year, month, day: year, month, and day of accident reporting;
- Location 2: Specific location (city, town, or village) of the turbine where the accident occurred;
- Location 1: State, province, county, and territory in which the accident occurred;
- Country: Country where the accident occurred;
- Language: Language (English, or German, etc.) in which news is reported;
- IsThereInjury: Indicates whether injury to a human occurred or not (takes the value “Injury” or “No Injury”);
- IsThereDeath: Indicates whether death of a human took place or not (takes the value “Death” or “No Death”);
- Offshore Onshore: Location of the turbine with respect to land (takes the values “Offshore” or “Onshore”);
- PhaseOfLifeCycle: Stage of the life cycle of the wind turbine during which the accident took place (takes the values “Transportation,” “Construction,” “Operation,” “Maintenance”). Deciding on the phase of the life cycle in which the accident occurred was a major challenge. Descriptions of the categories that guided this decision are provided in the Supplement;
- Mode of transportation when the accident took place, in case the PhaseOfLifeCycle was “Transportation” stage (takes values “Road,” “Water,” or “Rail”);
- Weblink: Link to the webpage of the news;
- IsLinkActive 1, 2, 3, 4: Indicates whether the webpages are currently working at different time points in the project. IsLinkActive3 refers to the state of May 2021;
- IsAllDataAvailable: Indicates whether the complete set of supporting documents, including screenshots of the original webpage and the corresponding text, are available in the collected and archived dataset. The value is “Yes” for all accidents;
- IsThereInjuryOrDeath: Indicates whether either injury to or death of a human took place (takes the value “Injury or Death” or “No Injury or Death”). If any of these two outcomes was observed, the value is “Yes”;
- IsFullText: Indicates whether the complete text of the news is available. The possible values are “FullText,” “TruncatedText,” “VideoSource,” or “PhotoSource”. In all cases, the collected and archived data have proof of originality and contain details of the accident. For the research, only “FullText” news was used;
- IsOriginalSource: Indicates whether the news is an original text or a news aggregator;
- DerivedFrom: Indicates the ID of the original news if the text had to be edited. For the instances in which it was not possible to identify the attribute value (e.g., while determining the PhaseOfLifeCycle, OffshoreOnshore location, or IsThereInjury), the respective field was left blank.
6. Analysis and Results
6.1. Data Preparation
6.2. Tabular and Visual Analysis
6.3. Text Processing
6.4. Text Visualization
6.5. Topic Modeling
6.5.1. Topic 1
6.5.2. Topic 2
6.5.3. Topic 3
6.5.4. Topic 4
6.5.5. Topic 5
6.5.6. Topic 6
6.5.7. Topic 7
6.5.8. Topic 8
6.5.9. Topic 9
6.5.10. Topic 10
6.5.11. Cross-Tabulation Analysis of Topics
6.6. Association Mining
6.7. Decision Tree Analysis
6.8. Predictive Analytics
7. Conclusions and Future Work
Supplementary Materials
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Overview, World Energy Outlook 2020, International Energy Agency. October 2020. Available online: https://www.iea.org/reports/world-energy-outlook-2020 (accessed on 28 September 2021).
- Renewable Energy Explained, US Energy Information Administration (EIA). 22 June 2020. Available online: https://www.eia.gov/energyexplained/renewable-sources/ (accessed on 28 September 2021).
- Renewables, World Energy Outlook 2019, International Energy Agency. November 2019. Available online: https://www.iea.org/reports/world-energy-outlook-2019/renewables#abstract (accessed on 28 September 2021).
- Wind Powers America Amended Annual Report 2019, American Wind Energy Association (AWEA). 2019. Available online: https://www.awea.org/resources/publications-and-reports/market-reports/2019-u-s-wind-industry-market-reports/amr2019_public (accessed on 1 October 2020).
- Ertek, G.; Chi, X.; Zhang, A.N.; Asian, S. Text Mining Analysis of Wind Turbine Accidents: An Ontology-Based Framework. In Proceedings of the 2017 IEEE International Conference on Big Data (Big Data), Boston, MA, USA, 11–14 December 2017; pp. 3233–3241. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Ertek, G.; Tunç, M.M.; Kurtaraner, E.; Kebude, D. Insights into the efficiencies of on-shore wind turbines: A data-centric analysis. In Proceedings of the 2012 International Symposium on Innovations in Intelligent Systems and Applications, Trabzon, Turkey, 2–4 July 2012; pp. 1–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- The Inside of a Wind Turbine, US Department of Energy. Available online: https://www.energy.gov/eere/wind/inside-wind-turbine (accessed on 26 November 2020).
- Asian, S.; Ertek, G.; Haksoz, C.; Pakter, S.; Ulun, S. Wind Turbine Accidents: A Data Mining Study. IEEE Syst. J. 2017, 11, 1567–1578. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Chou, J.-S.; Chiu, C.-K.; Huang, I.-K.; Chi, K.-N. Failure Analysis of Wind Turbine Blade under Critical Wind Loads. Eng. Fail. Anal. 2013, 27, 99–118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Uchida, T. Numerical Investigation of Terrain-Induced Turbulence in Complex Terrain by Large-Eddy Simulation (LES) Technique. Energies 2018, 11, 2638. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Okawa, M.; Fujiyama, C.; Koda, Y.; Kado, M. Damage Investigation of Existing Onshore Wind Turbine Foundation. In Proceedings of the Grand Renewable Energy Organized by Japan Council for Renewable Energy, Yokohama, Japan, 17–22 June 2018; p. 133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Uchida, T.; Takakuwa, S. A Large-Eddy Simulation-Based Assessment of the Risk of Wind Turbine Failures Due to Terrain-Induced Turbulence over a Wind Farm in Complex Terrain. Energies 2019, 12, 1925. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Yamamoto, K.; Sumi, S. Validations of Lightning Protections for Accidents at a Wind Farm. In Proceedings of the 2013 International Symposium on Lightning Protection (XII SIPDA), Belo Horizonte, Brazil, 7–11 October 2013; pp. 329–334. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Uchida, T. Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) Investigation of Wind Turbine Nacelle Separation Accident over Complex Terrain in Japan. Energies 2018, 11, 1485. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Chou, J.-S.; Tu, W.-T. Failure Analysis and Risk Management of a Collapsed Large Wind Turbine Tower. Eng. Fail. Anal. 2011, 18, 295–313. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liu, Y.; Li, Y.; Chi, Y.; Wang, Y. Analysis on a large scale wind turbines cascading trip-off accident in North China. In Proceedings of the 2013 IEEE Grenoble Conference, Grenoble, France, 16–20 June 2013; pp. 1–6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sun, H.; Zhang, Z.; Lin, W.; Tang, Y.; Luo, X.; Wang, A. Analysis on serious wind turbine generators tripping accident in Northwest China power grid in 2011 and its lessons. Power Syst. Technol. 2012, 36, 76–80. [Google Scholar]
- Dethleff, D.; Weinrich, N.; Seide, K.; Jürgens, C.; Stuhr, M. Accidental fall from an onshore wind turbine: Implications for offshore rescue using the example of a case study. Notf. Rett. 2016, 19, 591–597. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bielecki, A.; Ernst, S.; Skrodzka, W.; Wojnicki, I. The Externalities of Energy Production in the Context of Development of Clean Energy Generation. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2020, 27, 11506–11530. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Lee, S.H.; Kang, H.G. Integrated Societal Risk Assessment Framework for Nuclear Power and Renewable Energy Sources. Nucl. Eng. Technol. 2015, 47, 461–471. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Astiaso Garcia, D.; Bruschi, D. A Risk Assessment Tool for Improving Safety Standards and Emergency Management in Italian Onshore Wind Farms. Sustain. Energy Technol. Assess. 2016, 18, 48–58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gul, M.; Guneri, A.F.; Baskan, M. An Occupational Risk Assessment Approach for Construction and Operation Period of Wind Turbines. Glob. J. Environ. Sci. Manag. 2018, 4, 281–298. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sovacool, B.K.; Andersen, R.; Sorensen, S.; Sorensen, K.; Tienda, V.; Vainorius, A.; Schirach, O.M.; Bjørn-Thygesen, F. Balancing Safety with Sustainability: Assessing the Risk of Accidents for Modern Low-Carbon Energy Systems. J. Clean. Prod. 2016, 112, 3952–3965. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sovacool, B.K.; Kryman, M.; Laine, E. Profiling Technological Failure and Disaster in the Energy Sector: A Comparative Analysis of Historical Energy Accidents. Energy 2015, 90, 2016–2027. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kim, J.; Ryu, D.; Sovacool, B.K. Critically Assessing and Projecting the Frequency, Severity, and Cost of Major Energy Accidents. Extr. Ind. Soc. 2021, 8, 100885. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- International Statistical Analysis on Wind Turbine Failures, 67nd IEA Topical Expert Meeting, CENER, International Energy Agency, March 2011. Available online: http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.641.8834&rep=rep1&type=pdf (accessed on 28 September 2021).
- Report on Wind Turbine Subsystem Reliability—A Survey of Various Databases, National Renewable Energy Laboratory, U.S. Department of Energy. June 2013. Available online: https://www.nrel.gov/docs/fy13osti/59111.pdf (accessed on 28 September 2021).
- Moura Carneiro, F.O.; Barbosa Rocha, H.H.; Costa Rocha, P.A. Investigation of Possible Societal Risk Associated with Wind Power Generation Systems. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2013, 19, 30–36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Brouwer, S.R.; Al-Jibouri, S.H.S.; Cárdenas, I.C.; Halman, J.I.M. Towards Analysing Risks to Public Safety from Wind Turbines. Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 2018, 180, 77–87. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kim, G.-S.; Jeong, J.-H. A Classification on the Causes of Wind Turbine Accidents. J. Korea Soc. Power Syst. Eng. 2015, 19, 76–81. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Santos, F.P.; Teixeira, A.P.; Guedes Soares, C. Review of wind turbine accident and failure data. In Renewable Energies Offshore, 1st ed.; Guedes Soares, C., Ed.; Taylor & Francis Group: London, UK, 2015; pp. 953–959. [Google Scholar]
- Konstantinidis, E.I.; Botsaris, P.N. Wind Turbines: Current Status, Obstacles, Trends and Technologies. IOP Conf. Ser. Mater. Sci. Eng. 2016, 161, 012079. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Summary of Wind Turbine Accident Data to 30 September 2020, Caithness Windfarm Information Forum. 2020. Available online: http://www.caithnesswindfarms.co.uk/AccidentStatistics.htm (accessed on 28 September 2021).
- Ma, Y.; Martinez-Vazquez, P.; Baniotopoulos, C. Wind Turbine Tower Collapse Cases: A Historical Overview. Proc. Inst. Civ. Eng.-Struct. Build. 2019, 172, 547–555. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Chou, J.-S.; Ou, Y.-C.; Lin, K.-Y. Collapse Mechanism and Risk Management of Wind Turbine Tower in Strong Wind. J. Wind. Eng. Ind. Aerodyn. 2019, 193, 103962. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Uadiale, S.; Urbán, E.; Carvel, R.; Lange, D.; Rein, G. Overview of Problems and Solutions in Fire Protection Engineering of Wind Turbines. Fire Saf. Sci. 2014, 11, 983–995. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pfaffel, S.; Faulstich, S.; Rohrig, K. Performance and Reliability of Wind Turbines: A Review. Energies 2017, 10, 1904. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Lian, J.; Cai, O.; Dong, X.; Jiang, Q.; Zhao, Y. Health Monitoring and Safety Evaluation of the Offshore Wind Turbine Structure: A Review and Discussion of Future Development. Sustainability 2019, 11, 494. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Shafiee, M.; Sørensen, J.D. Maintenance Optimization and Inspection Planning of Wind Energy Assets: Models, Methods and Strategies. Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 2019, 192, 105993. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mentes, A.; Turan, O. A New Resilient Risk Management Model for Offshore Wind Turbine Maintenance. Saf. Sci. 2019, 119, 360–374. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Gao, Z.; Liu, X. An Overview on Fault Diagnosis, Prognosis and Resilient Control for Wind Turbine Systems. Processes 2021, 9, 300. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shohag, M.A.S.; Hammel, E.C.; Olawale, D.O.; Okoli, O.I. Damage Mitigation Techniques in Wind Turbine Blades: A Review. Wind. Eng. 2017, 41, 185–210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yamamoto, K.; Honjo, N. Latest Trends in Technologies for Sound Operation of Wind Turbines against Lightning. Electr. Eng. Jpn. 2018, 205, 3–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ye, X.; Lu, Z.; Qiao, Y.; Li, J.; Wang, F.; Luo, W. A Primary Analysis on Mechanism of Large Scale Cascading Trip-off of Wind Turbine Generators. Autom. Electr. Power Syst. 2012, 36, 11–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rastayesh, S.; Long, L.; Dalsgaard Sørensen, J.; Thöns, S. Risk Assessment and Value of Action Analysis for Icing Conditions of Wind Turbines Close to Highways. Energies 2019, 12, 2653. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Kotb, M.; Elhelloty, A.; Shaaba, M. A Methodology to The Safe Operation of Mobile Crane in Erection of Wind Turbine. Life Sci. J. 2019, 16, 6–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bai, X.; Sun, L.; Sun, H. Risk Assessment of Hoisting Aboard and Installation for Offshore Wind Turbine. In Proceedings of the ASME 2012 31st International Conference on Ocean, Offshore and Arctic Engineering, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, 1–6 July 2012; pp. 107–114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Presencia, C.E.; Shafiee, M. Risk Analysis of Maintenance Ship Collisions with Offshore Wind Turbines. Int. J. Sustain. Energy 2018, 37, 576–596. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kusiak, A.; Li, W. The Prediction and Diagnosis of Wind Turbine Faults. Renew. Energy 2011, 36, 16–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, L.; Zhang, Z.; Long, H.; Xu, J.; Liu, R. Wind Turbine Gearbox Failure Identification with Deep Neural Networks. IEEE Trans. Ind. Inf. 2017, 13, 1360–1368. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Blanco, A.; Marti-Puig, P.; Gibert, K.; Cusidó, J.; Solé-Casals, J. A Text-Mining Approach to Assess the Failure Condition of Wind Turbines Using Maintenance Service History. Energies 2019, 12, 1982. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Stetco, A.; Dinmohammadi, F.; Zhao, X.; Robu, V.; Flynn, D.; Barnes, M.; Keane, J.; Nenadic, G. Machine Learning Methods for Wind Turbine Condition Monitoring: A Review. Renew. Energy 2019, 133, 620–635. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Saufi, S.R.; Ahmad, Z.A.B.; Leong, M.S.; Lim, M.H. Gearbox Fault Diagnosis Using a Deep Learning Model with Limited Data Sample. IEEE Trans. Ind. Inf. 2020, 16, 6263–6271. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chen, P.; Li, Y.; Wang, K.; Zuo, M.J.; Heyns, P.S.; Baggeröhr, S. A Threshold Self-Setting Condition Monitoring Scheme for Wind Turbine Generator Bearings Based on Deep Convolutional Generative Adversarial Networks. Measurement 2021, 167, 108234. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chen, W.; Qiu, Y.; Feng, Y.; Li, Y.; Kusiak, A. Diagnosis of Wind Turbine Faults with Transfer Learning Algorithms. Renew. Energy 2021, 163, 2053–2067. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Colak, I.; Sagiroglu, S.; Yesilbudak, M. Data Mining and Wind Power Prediction: A Literature Review. Renew. Energy 2012, 46, 241–247. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ozkan, M.; Karagoz, P. A Novel Wind Power Forecast Model: Statistical Hybrid Wind Power Forecast Technique (SHWIP). IEEE Trans. Ind. Inf. 2015, 11, 375–387. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Haghi, H.V.; Lotfifard, S.; Qu, Z. Multivariate Predictive Analytics of Wind Power Data for Robust Control of Energy Storage. IEEE Trans. Ind. Inf. 2016, 12, 1350–1360. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Freiberg, A.; Schefter, C.; Girbig, M.; Murta, V.C.; Seidler, A. Health Effects of Wind Turbines on Humans in Residential Settings: Results of a Scoping Review. Environ. Res. 2019, 169, 446–463. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Demiriz, A.; Ertek, G.; Atan, T.; Kula, U. Re-Mining Item Associations: Methodology and a Case Study in Apparel Retailing. Decis. Support Syst. 2011, 52, 284–293. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ertek, G.; Tunc, M.M. Re-Mining Association Mining Results Through Visualization, Data Envelopment Analysis, and Decision Trees. In Computational Intelligence Systems in Industrial Engineering; Kahraman, C., Ed.; Atlantis Press: Paris, France, 2012; Volume 6, pp. 601–622. [Google Scholar]
- Abdallah, S.; Malik, M.; Ertek, G. A Data Mining Framework for the Analysis of Patient Arrivals into Healthcare Centers. In Proceedings of the 2017 International Conference on Information Technology—ICIT 2017, Singapore, 27–29 December 2017; ACM Press: Singapore; pp. 52–61. [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Mohri, M.; Rostamizadeh, A.; Talwalkar, A. Foundations of Machine Learning; Adaptive Computation and Machine Learning Series; MIT Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 2012; ISBN 9780262018258. [Google Scholar]
- Sutton, R.S.; Barto, A.G. Reinforcement Learning: An Introduction, 2nd ed.; Adaptive Computation and Machine Learning Series; The MIT Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 2018; ISBN 9780262039246. [Google Scholar]
- Muguro, J.K.; Sasaki, M.; Matsushita, K.; Njeri, W. Trend Analysis and Fatality Causes in Kenyan Roads: A Review of Road Traffic Accident Data between 2015 and 2020. Cogent Eng. 2020, 7, 1797981. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- John, M.; Marbach, E.; Lohmann, S.; Heimerl, F.; Ertl, T. MultiCloud: Interactive Word Cloud Visualization for the Analysis of Multiple Texts. In Proceedings of the Graphics Interface 2018, Toronto, ON, Canada, 8–11 May 2018; p. 8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Blei, D.M.; Ng, A.Y.; Jordan, M.I. Latent Dirichlet Allocation. J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2003, 3, 993–1022. [Google Scholar]
- Roque, C.; Lourenço Cardoso, J.; Connell, T.; Schermers, G.; Weber, R. Topic Analysis of Road Safety Inspections Using Latent Dirichlet Allocation: A Case Study of Roadside Safety in Irish Main Roads. Accid. Anal. Prev. 2019, 131, 336–349. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhong, B.; Pan, X.; Love, P.E.D.; Ding, L.; Fang, W. Deep Learning and Network Analysis: Classifying and Visualizing Accident Narratives in Construction. Autom. Constr. 2020, 113, 103089. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhong, B.; Pan, X.; Love, P.E.D.; Sun, J.; Tao, C. Hazard Analysis: A Deep Learning and Text Mining Framework for Accident Prevention. Adv. Eng. Inform. 2020, 46, 101152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kwayu, K.M.; Kwigizile, V.; Lee, K.; Oh, J.-S. Discovering Latent Themes in Traffic Fatal Crash Narratives Using Text Mining Analytics and Network Topology. Accid. Anal. Prev. 2021, 150, 105899. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ali, F.; Ali, A.; Imran, M.; Naqvi, R.A.; Siddiqi, M.H.; Kwak, K.-S. Traffic Accident Detection and Condition Analysis Based on Social Networking Data. Accid. Anal. Prev. 2021, 151, 105973. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Agrawal, R.; Imieliński, T.; Swami, A. Mining Association Rules between Sets of Items in Large Databases. In Proceedings of the 1993 ACM SIGMOD International Conference on Management of Data—SIGMOD’ 93, Washington, DC, USA, 25–28 May 1993; pp. 207–216. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gupta, K.; Potika, K. Fake News Analysis and Graph Classification on a COVID-19 Twitter Dataset. In Proceedings of the 2021 IEEE Seventh International Conference on Big Data Computing Service and Applications (BigDataService), Oxford, UK, 23–26 August 2021; pp. 60–68. [Google Scholar]
- Mishra, A.; Vishwakarma, S. Analysis of TF-IDF Model and Its Variant for Document Retrieval. In Proceedings of the 2015 International Conference on Computational Intelligence and Communication Networks (CICN), Jabalpur, India, 12–14 December 2015; pp. 772–776. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rivera-Trigueros, I. Machine Translation Systems and Quality Assessment: A Systematic Review. Lang. Resour. Eval. 2021, 53, 57–86. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chan, C.-H.; Zeng, J.; Wessler, H.; Jungblut, M.; Welbers, K.; Bajjalieh, J.W.; van Atteveldt, W.; Althaus, S.L. Reproducible Extraction of Cross-Lingual Topics (Rectr). Commun. Methods Meas. 2020, 14, 285–305. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hidalgo-Ternero, C.M. Google Translate vs. DeepL: Analysing neural machine translation performance under the challenge of phraseological variation. In Análisis Multidisciplinar del Fenómeno de la Variación Fraseológica en Traducción e Interpretación/Multidisciplinary Analysis of the Phenomenon of Phraseological Variation in Translation and Interpreting; Mogorrón Huerta, P., Ed.; Universitat Jaume I: Castellón de la Plana, Spain, 2020; Volume 6, pp. 154–177. [Google Scholar]
- Akyürek, A.F.; Guo, L.; Elanwar, R.; Ishwar, P.; Betke, M.; Wijaya, D.T. Multi-Label and Multilingual News Framing Analysis. In Proceedings of the 58th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, Online, 5–10 July 2020; Association for Computational Linguistics: Stroudsburg, PA, USA; pp. 8614–8624.
- Banitz, B. Machine Translation: A Critical Look at the Performance of Rule-Based and Statistical Machine Translation. Cad. Tradução 2020, 40, 54–71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ivie, P.; Thain, D. Reproducibility in Scientific Computing. ACM Comput. Surv. 2018, 51, 63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yuan, C.; Yang, H. Research on K-Value Selection Method of K-Means Clustering Algorithm. J 2019, 2, 226–235. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Liu, B. Sentiment analysis and opinion mining. Synth. Lect. Hum. Lang. Technol. 2012, 5, 1–167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Kherwa, P.; Bansal, P. Topic Modeling: A Comprehensive Review EAI Endorsed Transactions on Scalable Information Systems. EAI Endorsed Trans. Scalable Inf. Syst. 2019, 7, e2. [Google Scholar]
- Newman, D.; Asuncion, A.; Smyth, P.; Welling, M. Distributed Algorithms for Topic Models. J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2009, 10, 1801–1828. [Google Scholar]
- Dunteman, G.H.; Ho, M.H.R.; Ho, M.H.R. Maximum Likelihood Estimation—SAGE Research Methods. 2006, Volume 145. Available online: https://methods.sagepub.com/book/an-introduction-to-generalized-linear-models/n5.xml (accessed on 25 October 2021).
- Van der Maaten, L.; Hinton, G. Visualizing Data using t-SNE. J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2008, 9, 2579–2605. Available online: https://www.jmlr.org/papers/v9/vandermaaten08a.html (accessed on 25 October 2021).
- Silipo, R. Is Zero Closer to Eight or to One? Available online: https://towardsdatascience.com/is-zero-closer-to-eight-or-to-one-c6392242b696 (accessed on 25 October 2021).
- Power Restored to Maui Customers. 22 October 2018. Available online: https://www.mauinews.com/news/local-news/2018/10/power-restored-to-maui-customers/ (accessed on 10 June 2021).
- Wind Turbine Lorry Crash Blocks A713 Near Parton. 7 February 2017. Available online: https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-scotland-south-scotland-38892444 (accessed on 10 June 2021).
- Windrad Verliert Flügelspitze. 24 December 2013. Available online: https://www.lr-online.de/lausitz/luebbenau/windrad-verliert-fluegelspitze-34145302.html (accessed on 10 June 2021).
- Vestas Investigates Blade Failure at Danish Wind Farm. 29 January 2014. Available online: http://nawindpower.com/vestas-investigates-blade-failure-at-danish-wind-farm (accessed on 10 June 2021).
- Damaged Pubnico Point Wind Turbine: “Like Thunder Out of the Clear Blue Sky”. 20 March 2016. Available online: http://www.thevanguard.ca/News/Local/2016-03-20/article-4472202/Damaged-wind-turbine%3A-Like-thunder-out-of-the-clear-blue-sky-says-Pubnico-Point-resident-describing-sound/1 (accessed on 10 June 2021).
- Farmland Owners Sue Wind Farm Company. 27 June 2016. Available online: http://www.news-gazette.com/news/local/2016-06-27/farmland-owners-sue-wind-farm-company.html (accessed on 10 June 2021).
- Wind Turbine Fire Breaks Out at Winery: Cops. 8 June 2019. Available online: https://patch.com/new-york/northfork/wind-turbine-fire-breaks-out-winery-cops (accessed on 10 June 2021).
- Lightning Apparently Damages Windmill Blade. 4 September 2019. Available online: https://www.wwnytv.com/2019/09/04/lightning-apparently-damages-windmill-blade/ (accessed on 10 June 2021).
- Man Falls from Wind Tower in Dodge County. 1 November 2016. Available online: https://www.fdlreporter.com/story/news/local/2016/11/01/man-falls-wind-tower-dodge-county/93123732/ (accessed on 10 June 2021).
- Whitehorse’s Wind Turbines Are Pretty Much Blown. 16 August 2018. Available online: https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/north/whitehorse-wind-turbines-haeckel-hill-decommission-1.4786508 (accessed on 10 June 2021).
- Borgelt, C. Frequent Item Set Mining. WIREs Data Min. Knowl. Discov. 2012, 2, 437–456. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Calzada, I. Democratising Smart Cities? Penta-Helix Multistakeholder Social Innovation Framework. Smart Cities 2020, 3, 1145–1172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Caraka, R.E.; Noh, M.; Chen, R.C.; Lee, Y.; Gio, P.U.; Pardamean, B. Connecting Climate and Communicable Disease to Penta Helix Using Hierarchical Likelihood Structural Equation Modelling. Symmetry 2021, 13, 657. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lawani, K.; Hare, B.; Cameron, I. Scheduling Refresher-Based Rescue and Evacuation Training for Wind Turbine Technicians. In Proceedings of the The Canadian Society for Civil Engineering 5th International/11th Construction Specialty Conference, Vancouver, BC, Canada, 7–10 June 2015. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wind Turbine Generator Maintenance: What to Expect and Why. POWER Magazine, 1 December 2014. Available online: https://www.powermag.com/wind-turbine-generator-maintenance-what-to-expect-and-why/(accessed on 25 May 2021).
Percentage of Death | Percentage of Injury | |
---|---|---|
Brazil | 42.86% | 28.57% |
China | 37.50% | 25.00% |
India | 14.29% | 14.29% |
Turkey | 14.29% | 14.29% |
Ireland | 13.33% | 6.67% |
Germany | 7.19% | 8.63% |
UK | 6.00% | 9.00% |
USA | 4.86% | 5.56% |
Canada | 2.04% | 8.16% |
Australia | 0.00% | 19.05% |
Denmark | 0.00% | 0.00% |
France | 0.00% | 8.33% |
Phase of Life Cycle | Total Cases | No. of Cases with Injury | Percent of Cases with Injury | No. of Cases with Death | Percent of Cases with Death |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Construction | 80 | 24 | 30.00% | 23 | 28.75% |
Maintenance | 47 | 14 | 29.79% | 9 | 19.15% |
Operation | 477 | 2 | 0.42% | 2 | 0.42% |
Transportation | 106 | 12 | 11.32% | 7 | 6.60% |
Uncategorized phase | 11 | 7 | 63.64% | 3 | 27.27% |
Total | 721 | 59 | 8.18% | 44 | 6.10% |
Location | Total Cases | No. of Cases with Injury | Percent of Cases with Injury | No. of Cases with Death | Percent of Cases with Death |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Onshore | 674 | 50 | 7.42% | 39 | 5.79% |
Offshore | 46 | 9 | 19.57% | 5 | 10.87% |
Uncategorized location | 1 | ||||
Total | 721 | 59 | 8.18% | 44 | 6.10% |
Injury or Death | No Injury or Death | Injury | No Injury | Uncategorized Injury Cases | Death | No Death | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Topic 1 | 12% | 88% | 3% | 97% | 0% | 9% | 91% |
Topic 2 | 9% | 91% | 7% | 91% | 3% | 3% | 97% |
Topic 3 | 1% | 99% | 0% | 100% | 0% | 1% | 99% |
Topic 4 | 9% | 91% | 5% | 95% | 0% | 5% | 95% |
Topic 5 | 0% | 100% | 0% | 100% | 0% | 0% | 100% |
Topic 6 | 2% | 98% | 2% | 98% | 0% | 2% | 98% |
Topic 7 | 4% | 96% | 3% | 97% | 0% | 1% | 99% |
Topic 8 | 0% | 100% | 0% | 100% | 0% | 0% | 100% |
Topic 9 | 86% | 14% | 52% | 44% | 4% | 38% | 62% |
Topic 10 | 0% | 100% | 0% | 100% | 0% | 0% | 100% |
Construction | Maintenance | Operation | Transportation | Uncategorized Phase Cases | Total | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Topic 1 | 4 | 2 | 18 | 9 | 33 | |
Topic 2 | 5 | 71 | 76 | |||
Topic 3 | 3 | 6 | 67 | 1 | 1 | 78 |
Topic 4 | 11 | 5 | 58 | 3 | 77 | |
Topic 5 | 3 | 63 | 2 | 1 | 69 | |
Topic 6 | 13 | 1 | 28 | 6 | 48 | |
Topic 7 | 7 | 108 | 1 | 1 | 117 | |
Topic 8 | 2 | 1 | 44 | 47 | ||
Topic 9 | 41 | 18 | 5 | 12 | 8 | 84 |
Topic 10 | 3 | 7 | 81 | 1 | 92 | |
Total | 80 | 47 | 477 | 106 | 11 | 721 |
Offshore | Onshore | Uncategorized Location Case | Total | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Topic 1 | 18 | 14 | 1 | 33 |
Topic 2 | 76 | 76 | ||
Topic 3 | 78 | 78 | ||
Topic 4 | 13 | 64 | 77 | |
Topic 5 | 69 | 69 | ||
Topic 6 | 2 | 46 | 48 | |
Topic 7 | 117 | 117 | ||
Topic 8 | 47 | 47 | ||
Topic 9 | 10 | 74 | 84 | |
Topic 10 | 3 | 89 | 92 | |
Total | 46 | 674 | 1 | 721 |
Australia | Brazil | Canada | China | Denmark | France | Germany | India | Ireland | Turkey | UK | USA | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Topic 1 | 5% | 0% | 2% | 13% | 9% | 0% | 6% | 0% | 7% | 0% | 7% | 3% |
Topic 2 | 33% | 0% | 8% | 13% | 0% | 0% | 9% | 0% | 7% | 14% | 11% | 13% |
Topic 3 | 0% | 29% | 0% | 13% | 27% | 8% | 47% | 0% | 0% | 29% | 0% | 0% |
Topic 4 | 14% | 43% | 10% | 25% | 27% | 8% | 5% | 14% | 40% | 0% | 22% | 5% |
Topic 5 | 0% | 0% | 20% | 0% | 0% | 17% | 0% | 14% | 0% | 0% | 4% | 18% |
Topic 6 | 0% | 0% | 16% | 13% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 14% | 20% | 0% | 14% | 7% |
Topic 7 | 10% | 0% | 4% | 0% | 18% | 42% | 19% | 14% | 0% | 43% | 9% | 17% |
Topic 8 | 5% | 0% | 4% | 0% | 0% | 17% | 3% | 29% | 0% | 0% | 14% | 7% |
Topic 9 | 19% | 29% | 10% | 25% | 9% | 8% | 12% | 0% | 27% | 14% | 14% | 10% |
Topic 10 | 14% | 0% | 24% | 0% | 9% | 0% | 0% | 14% | 0% | 0% | 5% | 22% |
Total | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% |
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. |
© 2021 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Ertek, G.; Kailas, L. Analyzing a Decade of Wind Turbine Accident News with Topic Modeling. Sustainability 2021, 13, 12757. https://doi.org/10.3390/su132212757
Ertek G, Kailas L. Analyzing a Decade of Wind Turbine Accident News with Topic Modeling. Sustainability. 2021; 13(22):12757. https://doi.org/10.3390/su132212757
Chicago/Turabian StyleErtek, Gürdal, and Lakshmi Kailas. 2021. "Analyzing a Decade of Wind Turbine Accident News with Topic Modeling" Sustainability 13, no. 22: 12757. https://doi.org/10.3390/su132212757
APA StyleErtek, G., & Kailas, L. (2021). Analyzing a Decade of Wind Turbine Accident News with Topic Modeling. Sustainability, 13(22), 12757. https://doi.org/10.3390/su132212757