Artificial Intelligence and Its Role in Education
Abstract
:1. Introduction
- What is the role of AI in education?
- Does AI provide a solution to the difficulties associated with education?
- Does AI benefit education?
2. Literature Review
2.1. Artificial Intelligence
2.2. Tutoring System
- The knowledge and understanding about the course being taught, strategies for teaching, misconceptions, and possible errors.
- The experience acquired by the system through interaction with students. It includes the know-how of student error, student learning efforts, and their general information.
- The preferences or the priorities of each topic desired for student achievement level, and usability cost.
- The observation of the student’s interaction and test results.
2.3. Social Robots
2.4. Smart Learning
2.5. Artificial Intelligence and Education
3. Discussion
- What is the role of AI in education?
- Does AI provide a solution to the difficulties associated with education?
- Does AI benefit education?
3.1. What Is the Role of AI in Education?
3.2. Does AI Provide a Solution to the Difficulties Associated with Education?
3.3. Does AI Benefit Education?
4. Conclusions
4.1. Practical Implications
- The study provides a strong argument for the adoption and use of AIA in an educational setting.
- It also offers education policymakers guidance about the importance and role of AIA in education and how many issues can be addressed through it.
- It also provides educational institutions, teachers, and students with knowledge about how to use AIA, where to use it, and when to use it. Each of the parties can use the study differently according to their needs and requirements.
- It also enlightens the educators as to how AI is changing the education world and how it can assist risky tasks.
4.2. Limitations
- The study is based on a theoretical review of the current literature to conclude answers for the questions, which were the aims of the study. There are many other AI systems playing significant roles in education, such as grading, assessment, trial and error, and virtual reality, which were not covered in this work.
- A lack of testing the roles quantitatively to make them more generalized is another limitation.
- The study discusses several AI applications but not extensively due to its scope in remaining limited to the management of AI.
4.3. Future Work
- As stated above, the study is based on a theoretical review of the current literature to conclude answers for the questions which were the aims of the study. There are many other AI systems playing significant roles in education, such as grading, assessment, trial and error, and virtual reality, etc. which were not covered in this work. Future work could be carried out to cover the other aspects.
- Future work could test the roles quantitatively in order to make the research more generalized.
- Future studies can be conducted on each AI applications in education and learning to further explore the area.
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Hua, M.T.A. Promises and Threats: iN2015 Masterplan to Pervasive Computing in Singapore. Sci. Technol. Soc. 2012, 17, 37–56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ahmad, M.F.; Ghapar, W.R.G.W.A. The Era of Artificial Intelligence in Malaysian Higher Education: Impact and Challenges in Tangible Mixed-Reality Learning System toward Self Exploration Education (SEE). Procedia Comput. Sci. 2019, 163, 2–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ministry of Education, Science and Technology of the Republic of Korea (MEST). Smart Education Promotion Strategy; President’s Council on National ICT Strategies: Seoul, Korea, 2011. [Google Scholar]
- Popenici, S.A.D.; Kerr, S. Exploring the impact of artificial intelligence on teaching and learning in higher education. Res. Pract. Technol. Enhanc. Learn. 2017, 12, 22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Barton, D.; Woetzel, J.; Seong, J.; Tian, Q. Artificial Intelligence: Implications for China; Discussion Paper Presented at the 2017 China Development Forum; McKinsey Global Institute: Washington, DC, USA, 2017. [Google Scholar]
- Kempe, F. The US Is Falling behind China in Crucial Race for AI Dominance. CNBC. 2019. Available online: https://www.cnbc.com/2019/01/25:%20CNBC (accessed on 20 April 2019).
- Defense Innovations Board (DIB). AI Principles: Recommendations on the Ethical Use of Artificial Intelligence by the Department of Defense; Defense Innovations Board: Washington, DC, USA, 2019. [Google Scholar]
- Allen, G.C. Understanding China’s AI Strategy Clues to Chinese Strategic Thinking on Artificial Intelligence and National Security. Centre for New American Security. 2019. Available online: https://www.cnas.org/publications/reports/understanding-chinas-ai-strategy (accessed on 20 January 2021).
- Knox, J. Artificial intelligence and education in China. Learn. Media Technol. 2020, 45, 298–311. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- McCarthy, J.; Minsky, M.L.; Rochester, N.; Shannon, C.E. A proposal for the Dartmouth summer research project on artificial intelligence. AI Mag. 1955, 27, 12–14. [Google Scholar]
- Turing, A.M. Computing machinery and intelligence. Mind 1950, 59, 433–460. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Legg, S.; Hutter, M. A Collection of Definitions of Intelligence. Front. Artif. Intell. Appl. 2007, 157, 17–24. [Google Scholar]
- Russell, S.J.; Norvig, P. Artificial Intelligence: A Modern Approach, 2nd ed.; Prentice Hall: Upper Saddle River, NJ, USA, 2003; ISBN 0-13-790395-2. [Google Scholar]
- Hackernoon. How AI Is Getting Groundbreaking Changes in Talent Management and HR Tech. Available online: https://hackernoon.com (accessed on 14 February 2020).
- Schank, R.C. Where’s the AI. AI Mag. 1991, 12, 38. [Google Scholar]
- Allen, G. Department of Defense Joint AI Center—Understanding AI Technology. AI.mil—The Official Site of the Department of Defense Joint Artificial Intelligence Center. 2020. Available online: https://www.ai.mil.doc (accessed on 20 January 2021).
- Kolata, G. How Can Computers Get Common Sense? Science 1982, 217, 1237–1238. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Kurzweil, R. The Singularity Is Near; Penguin Books: London, UK, 2005; ISBN 978-0-670-03384-3. [Google Scholar]
- Tegmark, M. Life 3.0: Being Human in the Age of Artificial Intelligence; Penguin Books: London, UK, 2018. [Google Scholar]
- Hinojo-Lucena, F.-J.; Aznar-Díaz, I.; Cáceres-Reche, M.-P.; Romero-Rodríguez, J.-M. Artificial Intelligence in Higher Education: A Bibliometric Study on Its Impact in the Scientific Literature. Educ. Sci. 2019, 9, 51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Psotka, J.; Mutter, S.A. Intelligent Tutoring Systems: Lessons Learned; Lawrence Erlbaum Associates: Mahwah, NJ, USA, 1988; ISBN 978-0-8058-0192-7. [Google Scholar]
- VanLehn, K. The Relative Effectiveness of Human Tutoring, Intelligent Tutoring Systems, and Other Tutoring Systems. Educ. Psychol. 2011, 46, 197–221. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shneyderman, A. Evaluation of the Cognitive Tutor Algebra I Program; Miami–Dade County Public Schools, Office of Evaluation and Research: Miami, FL, USA, 2001. [Google Scholar]
- Corbett, A.T.; Koedinger, K.R.; Anderson, J.R. Intelligent tutoring systems. In Handbook of Human-Computer Interaction; Helander, M.G., Landauer, T.K., Prabhu, P.V., Eds.; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 1997; pp. 849–874. [Google Scholar]
- Shah, F.; Evens, M.; Michael, J.; Rovick, A. Classifying Student Initiatives and Tutor Responses in Human Keyboard-to-Keyboard Tutoring Sessions. Discourse Process. 2002, 33, 23–52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mitrovic, A.; Martin, B.; Suraweera, P.; Zakharov, K.; Milik, N.; Holland, J.; Mcguigan, N. ASPIRE: An authoring system and deployment environment for constraint-based tutors. Int. J. Artif. Intell. Educ. 2009, 19, 155–188. [Google Scholar]
- Sottilare, R. Considerations in the development of an ontology for a generalized intelligent framework for tutoring. In Proceedings of the I3M Defense and Homeland Security Simulation Conference (DHSS 2012), Vienna, Austria, 19–21 September 2012. [Google Scholar]
- Aleven, V.; McLaren, B.M.; Sewall, J.; van Velsen, M.; Popescu, O.; Demi, S.; Ringenberg, M.; Koedinger, K.R. Example-Tracing Tutors: Intelligent Tutor Development for Non-programmers. Int. J. Artif. Intell. Educ. 2016, 26, 224–269. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Nye, B.D.; Graesser, A.C.; Hu, X. AutoTutor and Family: A Review of 17 Years of Natural Language Tutoring. Int. J. Artif. Intell. Educ. 2014, 24, 427–469. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Razzaq, L.; Patvarczki, J.; Almeida, S.; Vartak, M.; Feng, M.; Heffernan, N.; Koedinger, K. The Assistment Builder: Supporting the Life Cycle of Tutoring System Content Creation. IEEE Trans. Learn. Technol. 2009, 2, 157–166. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Johal, W.; Castellano, G.; Tanaka, F.; Okita, S. Robots for Learning. Int. J. Soc. Robot. 2018, 10, 293–294. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gockley, R.; Forlizzi, J.; Simmons, R. Natural person-following behavior for social robots. In Proceedings of the ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction—HRI ’07, Washington, DC, USA, 9–11 March 2007. [Google Scholar]
- Gladden, M. Sapient Circuits and Digitalized Flesh: The Organization as Locus of Technological Posthumanization, 2nd ed.; Defragmenter Media: Indianapolis, IN, USA, 2018; ISBN 978-1-944373-21-4. [Google Scholar]
- Taipale, S.; Vincent, J.; Sapio, B.; Lugano, G.; Fortunati, L. Introduction: Situating the Human in Social Robots. In Social Robots from a Human Perspective; Vincent, J., Taipale, S., Sapio, B., Lugano, G., Fortunati, L., Eds.; Springer: Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 2015; pp. 1–17. [Google Scholar]
- Leite, I.; Martinho, C.; Paiva, A. Social Robots for Long-Term Interaction: A Survey. Int. J. Soc. Robot. 2013, 5, 291–308. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lin, C.; Šabanović, S.; Dombrowski, L.; Miller, A.D.; Brady, E.; MacDorman, K.F. Parental Acceptance of Children’s Storytelling Robots: A Projection of the Uncanny Valley of AI. Front. Robot. AI 2021, 8, 579993. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Li, J.; Kizilcec, R.; Bailenson, J.; Ju, W. Social robots and virtual agents as lecturers for video instruction. Comput. Hum. Behav. 2016, 55, 1222–1230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Edwards, A.; Edwards, C.; Spence, P.R.; Harris, C.; Gambino, A. Robots in the classroom: Differences in students’ perceptions of credibility and learning between “teacher as robot” and “robot as teacher”. Comput. Hum. Behav. 2016, 65, 627–634. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Double Robotics. Blended Learning/Hybrid Classroom. Double. 2017. Available online: https://www.doublerobotics.com/education/ (accessed on 1 July 2021).
- Kennedy, J.; Ramachandran, A.; Scassellati, B.; Tanaka, F. Social robots for education: A review. Sci. Robot. 2018, 3, eaat5954. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Castellano, G.; Paiva, A.; Kappas, A.; Aylett, R.; Hastie, H.; Barendregt, W.; Nabais, F.; Bull, S. Towards empathic virtual and robotic tutors. In International Conference on Artificial Intelligence in Education; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2013; pp. 733–736. [Google Scholar]
- Feil-Seifer, D.; Skinner, K.; Matarić, M.J. Benchmarks for evaluating socially assistive robotics. Interact. Stud. 2007, 8, 423–439. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Lee, J.; Zo, H.; Lee, H. Smart learning adoption in employees and HRD managers. Br. J. Educ. Technol. 2014, 45, 1082–1096. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Javaheri, A.; Moghadamnejad, N.; Keshavarz, H.; Javaheri, E.; Dobbins, C.; Momeni, E.; Daniel, R.J. Making sense of MOOCs: Musings in a maze of myth, paradox and possibility. J. Interact. Media Educ. 2012, 3, Art-18. [Google Scholar]
- Bruce, B.C.; Levin, J.A. Educational Technology: Media for Inquiry, Communication, Construction, and Expression. J. Educ. Comput. Res. 1997, 17, 79–102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Meyer, B.B.; Latham, N. Implementing electronic portfolios: Benefits, challenges, and suggestions. Educause Q 2008, 31, 34–41. [Google Scholar]
- Goodman, S. Teaching Youth Media: A Critical Guide to Literacy, Video Production and Social Change; Teachers College: New York, NY, USA, 2003. [Google Scholar]
- Hwang, G.J.; Tsai, C.C.; Yang, S.J.H. Criteria, strategies and research issues of context-aware ubiquitous learning. J. Educ. Technol. Soc. 2008, 11, 81–91. [Google Scholar]
- Hwang, G.-J. Definition, framework and research issues of smart learning environments—A context-aware ubiquitous learning perspective. Smart Learn. Environ. 2014, 1, 4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Scott, K.; Benlamri, R. Context-Aware Services for Smart Learning Spaces. IEEE Trans. Learn. Technol. 2010, 3, 214–227. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gwak, D. The Meaning and Predict of Smart Learning, Smart Learning Korea Proceeding; Korean e-Learning Industry Association: Mascow, Russia, 2010. [Google Scholar]
- Kim, T.; Cho, J.Y.; Lee, B.G. Evolution to smart learning in public education: A case study of korean public education. In Open and Social Technologies for Networked Learning; Ley, T., Ruohonen, M., Laanpere, M., Tatnall, A., Eds.; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2013; Volume 395, pp. 170–178. [Google Scholar]
- Middleton, A. Smart Learning: Teaching and Learning with Smartphones and Tablets in Post Compulsory Education; Media-Enhanced Learning Special Interest Group and Sheffield Hallam University: Sheffield, UK, 2015. [Google Scholar]
- Zhu, Z.-T.; He, B. Smart education: New frontier of educational informatization. E-Educ. Res. 2012, 12, 1–13. [Google Scholar]
- Kwak, D.-H. Meaning and Prospect for Smart Learning. In Proceedings of the Seminar for Korea e-Learning Industry Association, Seoul, Korea, 16–18 September 2010; Volume 13. [Google Scholar]
- Duran-Sanchez, A.; Alvarez-Garcia, J.; Del Rio-Rama, M.; De La, C.; Sarango-Lalangui, O. Analysis of the scientific literature published on smart learning. Espacios 2017, 39, 14–27. [Google Scholar]
- Lee, J.-E.; Lim, D.; Um, G. A cyber engineering education strategy based on smart learning. Information 2015, 18, 1169–1174. [Google Scholar]
- Chen, N.S.; Cheng, I.L.; Chew, S.W. Evolution is not enough: Revolutionizing current learning environments to smart learning environments. Int. J. Artif. Intell. Educ. 2016, 26, 561–581. [Google Scholar]
- Bowling, M.; Burch, N.; Johanson, M.; Tammelin, O. Heads-up limit hold’em poker is solved. Science 2015, 347, 145–149. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Lee, J.E.; Jin, S.M. Implementation of Smart Learning Model for Improving Digital Communication Competencies of Middle Aged. J. Korea Contents Assoc. 2014, 14, 522–533. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- EDUCAUSE. Horizon Report: 2018 Higher Education Edition. Retrieved from EDUCAUSE Learning Initiative and The New Media Consortium. 2018. Available online: https://library.educause.edu/~/media/files/library/2018/8/2018horizonreport.pdf (accessed on 19 April 2021).
- EDUCAUSE. Horizon Report: 2019 Higher Education Edition. Retrieved from EDUCAUSE Learning Initiative and The New Media Consortium. 2019. Available online: https://library.educause.edu/-/media/files/library/2019/4/2019horizonreport.pdf (accessed on 19 April 2021).
- Contact North. Ten Facts about Artificial Intelligence in Teaching and Learning. 2018. Available online: https://teachonline.ca/sites/default/files/tools-trends/downloads/ten_facts_about_artificial_intelligence.pdf (accessed on 19 April 2021).
- Russel, S.; Norvig, P. Artificial Intelligence—A Modern Approach; Pearson Education: Cranbury, NJ, USA, 2010. [Google Scholar]
- Jonassen, D.; Davidson, M.; Collins, M.; Campbell, J.; Haag, B.B. Constructivism and computer-mediated communication in distance education. Am. J. Distance Educ. 1995, 9, 7–26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Luckin, R.; Holmes, W.; Griffiths, M.; Forcier, L.B. Intelligence Unleashed—An Argument for AI in Education. 2016. Available online: http://discovery.ucl.ac.uk/1475756/ (accessed on 20 January 2021).
- Perez, S.; Massey-Allard, J.; Butler, D.; Ives, J.; Bonn, D.; Yee, N.; Roll, I. Identifying productive inquiry in virtual labs using sequence mining. In Artificial Intelligence in Education; André, E., Baker, R., Hu, X., Rodrigo, M.M.T., du Boulay, B., Eds.; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2017; Volume 10331, pp. 287–298. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bahadır, E. Using Neural Network and Logistic Regression Analysis to Predict Prospective Mathematics Teachers’ Academic Success upon Entering Graduate Education. Educ. Sci. Theory Pract. 2016, 16, 943–964. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. |
© 2021 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Ahmad, S.F.; Rahmat, M.K.; Mubarik, M.S.; Alam, M.M.; Hyder, S.I. Artificial Intelligence and Its Role in Education. Sustainability 2021, 13, 12902. https://doi.org/10.3390/su132212902
Ahmad SF, Rahmat MK, Mubarik MS, Alam MM, Hyder SI. Artificial Intelligence and Its Role in Education. Sustainability. 2021; 13(22):12902. https://doi.org/10.3390/su132212902
Chicago/Turabian StyleAhmad, Sayed Fayaz, Mohd. Khairil Rahmat, Muhammad Shujaat Mubarik, Muhammad Mansoor Alam, and Syed Irfan Hyder. 2021. "Artificial Intelligence and Its Role in Education" Sustainability 13, no. 22: 12902. https://doi.org/10.3390/su132212902
APA StyleAhmad, S. F., Rahmat, M. K., Mubarik, M. S., Alam, M. M., & Hyder, S. I. (2021). Artificial Intelligence and Its Role in Education. Sustainability, 13(22), 12902. https://doi.org/10.3390/su132212902