Next Article in Journal
Will Plans to Ease Energy Poverty Go Up in Smoke? Assessing the Hungarian NECP through the Lens of Solid Fuel Users’ Vulnerabilities
Next Article in Special Issue
Air Pollution and Medical Insurance: From a Health-Based Perspective
Previous Article in Journal
Parameter Estimation of Static/Dynamic Photovoltaic Models Using a Developed Version of Eagle Strategy Gradient-Based Optimizer
Previous Article in Special Issue
Economic Benefits and Pollutants Emission Embodied in China–US Merchandise Trade—Comparative Analysis Based on Gross Trade, Value Added Trade and Value Added in Trade
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Health and Economic Impact Assessment of Transport and Industry PM2.5 Control Policy in Guangdong Province

1
Guangzhou Institute of Energy Conversion, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Guangzhou 510640, China
2
College of Environmental Sciences and Engineering, Peking University, Beijing 100871, China
3
National Institute for Environmental Studies, Tsukuba 300-4352, Japan
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Sustainability 2021, 13(23), 13049; https://doi.org/10.3390/su132313049
Submission received: 27 September 2021 / Revised: 16 November 2021 / Accepted: 18 November 2021 / Published: 25 November 2021

Abstract

PM2.5 pollution-related diseases lead to additional medical expenses and the loss of working hours, thus affecting the macro-economy. To evaluate the health-related economic impacts of PM2.5, the Integrated Assessment Model of Climate, Economic, and Environment (ICEEH), combined with the Computable General Equilibrium (CGE) model, the Greenhouse Gas and Air Pollution Interactions and Synergies (GAINS) model, and a health impact assessment module was constructed. The impact of different air pollution control strategies was analyzed in Guangdong Province by establishing a Without Control (WOC) scenario, an Air Control (AIC) scenario, and a Blue Sky (BLK) scenario. The results show that in the WOC scenario for 2035, the death rate for Guangdong Province is 71,690 persons/year and the loss of working hours is 0.67 h/person/year. In the AIC and BLK scenarios compared with WOC for 2035, the loss of working hours is reduced by 29.8% and 34.3%, and premature deaths are reduced by 33.0% and 37.5%, respectively; GDP would increase by 0.05% and 0.11%, respectively, through strict pollution control policies. Furthermore, improved labor force quality induced by better air conditions would promote the added value in labor-intensive industries, such as agriculture (0.233%), other manufacturing (0.172%), textiles (0.181%), food (0.176%), railways transport (0.137%), and services (0.129%). The added value in the waste (−0.073%), nature gas (−0.076%), and crude oil sectors (−0.072%) would decrease because of the increased investment installment in PM2.5 treatment equipment.
Keywords: health impact; PM2.5 pollution; transport and industry; air control strategy health impact; PM2.5 pollution; transport and industry; air control strategy

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Ren, S.; Wang, P.; Dai, H.; Zhao, D.; Masui, T. Health and Economic Impact Assessment of Transport and Industry PM2.5 Control Policy in Guangdong Province. Sustainability 2021, 13, 13049. https://doi.org/10.3390/su132313049

AMA Style

Ren S, Wang P, Dai H, Zhao D, Masui T. Health and Economic Impact Assessment of Transport and Industry PM2.5 Control Policy in Guangdong Province. Sustainability. 2021; 13(23):13049. https://doi.org/10.3390/su132313049

Chicago/Turabian Style

Ren, Songyan, Peng Wang, Hancheng Dai, Daiqing Zhao, and Toshihiko Masui. 2021. "Health and Economic Impact Assessment of Transport and Industry PM2.5 Control Policy in Guangdong Province" Sustainability 13, no. 23: 13049. https://doi.org/10.3390/su132313049

APA Style

Ren, S., Wang, P., Dai, H., Zhao, D., & Masui, T. (2021). Health and Economic Impact Assessment of Transport and Industry PM2.5 Control Policy in Guangdong Province. Sustainability, 13(23), 13049. https://doi.org/10.3390/su132313049

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop