Next Article in Journal
Barriers to the Adoption of Urban Living Labs for NBS Implementation: A Systemic Perspective
Previous Article in Journal
Economies of Scale and Sustainability in Local Government: A Complex Issue
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

A Comparative Analysis of Consumption: Evidence from a Cultural Goods Market

1
Erasmus School of History, Culture and Communication, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Postbus 1738, 3000 DR Rotterdam, The Netherlands
2
Department of Management, Faculty of Business Administration and Economics, Paderborn University, 33098 Paderborn, Germany
3
Faculty of Business and Law, University of Portsmouth, Portsmouth PO1 2UP, UK
4
Faculty of Business, Athabasca University, Athabasca, AB T9S 1A5, Canada
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Sustainability 2021, 13(23), 13275; https://doi.org/10.3390/su132313275
Submission received: 20 September 2021 / Revised: 8 November 2021 / Accepted: 24 November 2021 / Published: 30 November 2021

Abstract

This study uniquely employs a fuzzy-set qualitative comparative analysis (fsQCA) technique to account for complex relationships in consumption. The fsQCA technique assumes that relationships are based on a set–subset relationship. This assumption is fundamental when decision-makers are affected by information asymmetry and are, thus, required to jointly evaluate the credibility and reliability of a range of external signals. This issue also affects consumers in markets for cultural goods, where the quality of products is not known with certainty in advance of the purchase decision. Our study uses fsQCA to establish the effect of different quality signals on consumption in the US market for video game software. Our results show that reviews from professional critics alongside brand extension and multi-platform release strategies act as signals of product quality and, therefore, lead to high sales performance.
Keywords: fuzzy sets; qualitative comparative analysis; cultural goods fuzzy sets; qualitative comparative analysis; cultural goods

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Kaimann, D.; Cox, J. A Comparative Analysis of Consumption: Evidence from a Cultural Goods Market. Sustainability 2021, 13, 13275. https://doi.org/10.3390/su132313275

AMA Style

Kaimann D, Cox J. A Comparative Analysis of Consumption: Evidence from a Cultural Goods Market. Sustainability. 2021; 13(23):13275. https://doi.org/10.3390/su132313275

Chicago/Turabian Style

Kaimann, Daniel, and Joe Cox. 2021. "A Comparative Analysis of Consumption: Evidence from a Cultural Goods Market" Sustainability 13, no. 23: 13275. https://doi.org/10.3390/su132313275

APA Style

Kaimann, D., & Cox, J. (2021). A Comparative Analysis of Consumption: Evidence from a Cultural Goods Market. Sustainability, 13(23), 13275. https://doi.org/10.3390/su132313275

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop