Next Article in Journal
Factors that Inhibit Sustainable Adoption of Industry 4.0 in the South African Manufacturing Industry
Next Article in Special Issue
Relationship between Statistics Anxiety and Academic Dishonesty: A Comparison between Learning Environments in Social Sciences
Previous Article in Journal
Using a Genetic Algorithm to Build a Volume Weighted Average Price Model in a Stock Market
Previous Article in Special Issue
Understanding Student Acceptance of Online Learning Systems in Higher Education: Application of Social Psychology Theories with Consideration of User Innovativeness
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Sustainability
Volume 13
Issue 3
10.3390/su13031012
Review Report
sustainability-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles
Article
Peer-Review Record

Contradictory Aspects of Job Searching in the COVID-19 Pandemic: Relationships between Perceived Socioeconomic Constraints, Work Volition, and the Meaning of Work

Sustainability 2021, 13(3), 1012; https://doi.org/10.3390/su13031012
by Pilhyoun Yoon 1 and Juhee Hahn 2,*
Reviewer 1: Anonymous
Reviewer 2: Anonymous
Reviewer 3: Anonymous
Sustainability 2021, 13(3), 1012; https://doi.org/10.3390/su13031012
Submission received: 29 December 2020 / Revised: 11 January 2021 / Accepted: 17 January 2021 / Published: 20 January 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue University Education in the Age of COVID-19: Transformations and Challenges for Students and Teachers)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

Dear Authors,

thank you very much for the possibility to read and review your article. The topic is interesting and can be a case study for another countries/regions.

Although the whole article is well prepared, I suggest improving the conclusion by extending with discussion to another author. This part of your article is rather poor and week. 

 

 

Author Response

Thank you for the valuable point of Reviewer 1. The pointed out has been revised and supplemented as attached.

 

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Reviewer 2 Report

Dear Authors,

As one of the reviewers of your article I read your manuscript and I found it interesting. However there are some issues that must be improved for publication.

the main issues are as the following:

Questions of your research sounds obvious, not questions. I commented. Conclusion is too weak. you must present a summary of your study and also compare the results with other studies. you did it just two times, while there is a potential for more comparation. there is no suggestions for future researches, while it is very necessary. Also connection of your study with Covid 19 is not clear and I beleive it is disconected. removing covid-19 doesn't effect on the consistency of your manuscript. So, I think you must work on it or completely remove it.

Please read my comments on the attached file and then revise your manuscrpt on this basis. I will be ready to evaluate your revision.

Best of luck

 

Comments for author File: Comments.pdf

Author Response

Thanks for the reviewer's point. Amendments and supplements are attached. please check.

 

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Reviewer 3 Report

The article is interesting and very up to date. I consider the literature review to be sufficient, although adding a few more items from Central European literature would not hurt this review. The methods used are appropriate, the inference is justified.

Author Response

Thanks for the reviewer's point. Amendments and supplements are attached. please check.

 

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Round 2

Reviewer 2 Report

Dear Authors,

Thank you for your revision and your explanations. I feel satisfied with this version and have no more comments.

Best of luck

 

Back to TopTop