Understanding Consumers’ Convenience Orientation. An Exploratory Study of Fresh-Cut Fruit in Italy
Abstract
:1. Introduction
Studies on Food-Related Lifestyles of Consumers
2. Materials and Methods
3. Results
Target Groups of Fresh-Cut Fruit Consumers
4. Discussion
5. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Contini, C.; Boncinelli, F.; Gerini, F.; Scozzafava, G.; Casini, L. Investigating the role of personal and context-related factors in convenience foods consumption. Appetite 2018, 126, 26–35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Dixon, J.M.; Hinde, S.J.; Banwell, C.L. Obesity, convenience and “phood”. Br. Food J. 2006, 108, 634–645. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Verlegh, P.W.; Candel, M.J. The consumption of convenience foods: Reference groups and eating situations. Food Qual. Prefer. 1999, 10, 457–464. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pollard, J.; Kirk, S.L.; Cade, J.E. Factors affecting food choice in relation to fruit and vegetable intake: A review. Nutr. Res. Rev. 2002, 15, 373–387. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Frewer, L.J.; Risvik, E.; Schifferstein, H. (Eds.) Food, People and Society: A European Perspective of Consumers’ Food Choice; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2001. [Google Scholar]
- Raybaudi-Massilia, R.; Calderón-Gabaldón, M.I.; Mosqueda-Melgar, J.; Tapia, M.S. Inactivation of Salmonella enterica ser. Poona and Listeria monocytogenes on fresh-cut ‘maradol’ red papaya (Carica papaya L) treated with UV-C light and malic acid. J. Für Verbrauch. Und Lebensm. 2013, 8, 37–44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Brown, H.; Williams, J.; Kirwan, M. Packaged product quality and shelf life. In Food Beverage Packaging Technology; Blackwell Publishing Ltd.: Oxford, UK, 2011; pp. 108–109. [Google Scholar]
- Capps, O., Jr.; Tedford, J.R.; Havlice, J., Jr. Household demand for convenience and nonconvenience foods. Am. J. Agric. Econ. 1985, 67, 862–869. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hyldelund, N.B.; Worck, S.; Olsen, A. Convenience may increase vegetable intake among young consumers. Food Qual. Prefer. 2020, 86, 1–6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Vecchio, R.; Cavallo, C. Increasing healthy food choices through nudges: A systematic review. Food Qual. Prefer. 2019, 78, 103714. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Aschemann-Witzel, J.; Maroscheck, N.; Hamm, U. Are organic consumers preferring or avoiding foods with nutrition and health claims? Food Qual. Prefer. 2013, 30, 68–76. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Olsen, N.V.; Menichelli, E.; Sørheim, O.; Næs, T. Likelihood of buying healthy convenience food: An at-home testing procedure for ready-to-heat meals. Food Qual. Prefer. 2012, 24, 171–178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dhir, B.; Singla, N. Consumption Pattern and Health Implications of Convenience Foods: A Practical Review. Curr. J. Appl. Sci. Technol. 2019, 38, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Agruto, A. Measuring Intake of Fruit and Vegetables; World Health Organization (WHO): Geneva, Switzerland, 2005; Available online: https://www.who.int/dietphysicalactivity/publications/f&v_intake_measurement.pdf (accessed on 28 May 2020).
- Freshfel. Consumption Monitor. European Fresh Produce Association. Available online: https://freshfel.org/what-we-do/consumption-monitor/ (accessed on 2 July 2020).
- Dinnella, C.; Torri, L.; Caporale, G.; Monteleone, E. An exploratory study of sensory attributes and consumer traits underlying liking for and perceptions of freshness for ready to eat mixed salad leaves in Italy. Food Res. Int. 2014, 59, 108–116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ricci, E.C.; Banterle, A.; Stranieri, S. Trust to Go Green: An Exploration of Consumer Intentions for Eco-friendly Convenience Food. Ecol. Econ. 2018, 148, 54–65. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Nassivera, F.; Sillani, S. Consumer perceptions and motivations in choice of minimally processed vegetables. Br. Food J. 2015, 117, 970–986. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Farina, V.; Passafiume, R.; Tinebra, I.; Scuderi, D.; Saletta, F.; Gugliuzza, G.; Gallotta, A.; Sortino, G. Postharvest application of aloe vera gel-based edible coating to improve the quality and storage stability of fresh-cut papaya. J. Food Qual. 2020, 2020, 8303140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Baselice, A.; Colantuoni, F.; Lass, D.A.; Nardone, G.; Stasi, A. Trends in EU Consumers’ Attitude Towards Fresh-Cut Fruit and Vegetables. Food Qual. Prefer. 2017, 59, 87–96. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nomisma. Mercati, Esigenze, Valori: Il Punto Sulla Categoria. In Proceedings of the IV Gamma Booming, Perché e Fino a Quando? Tuttofood, Milano, Italy, 7 May 2019; Available online: https://www.freshcutnews.it/2019/05/10/lindagine-nomisma-conferma-spiega-successo-della-iv-gamma/ (accessed on 29 June 2020).
- Freshfel. Activity Report 2017. Where Is the Fruit? European Fresh Produce Association. Available online: https://freshfel.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/03/Freshfel-Where-is-the-fruit-report-2017.pdf (accessed on 10 July 2020).
- Nassivera, F.; Sillani, S. Consumer Behavior Toward Eco-Labeled Minimally Processed Fruit Product. J. Int. Food Agribus. Mark. 2017, 29, 29–45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Farina, V.; Passafiume, R.; Tinebra, I.; Palazzolo, E.; Sortino, G. Use of Aloe vera gel-based edible coating with natural anti-browning and anti-oxidant additives to improve post-harvest quality of fresh-cut ‘Fuji’ apple. Agronomy 2020, 10, 515. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Farina, V.; Gentile, C.; Sortino, G.; Gianguzzi, G.; D’Asaro, A.; Saletta, F.; Piva, G.; Inglese, P.; Liguori, G. Effects of gellan-based coating application on litchi fruit quality traits. Acta Hortic. 2018, 1194, 335–341. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Montero-Vicente, L.; Roig-Merino, B.; Buitrago-Vera, J.; Sigalat-Signes, E. Characterisation of fresh fruit consumption in Spain based on food-related lifestyle. Br. Food J. 2019, 121, 3307–3320. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Raimundo, L.M.B.; Batalha, M.O.; Sans, P. Consumer Attitudes Towards Convenience Food Usage: Exploring the Case of São Paulo, Brazil. J. Int. Food Agribus. Mark. 2019, 32, 403–424. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- De Boer, M.; McCarthy, M.; Cowan, C.; Ryan, I. The influence of lifestyle characteristics and beliefs about convenience food on the demand for convenience foods in the Irish market. Food Qual. Prefer. 2014, 15, 155–165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Brunsø, K.; Grunert, K.G. Cross-cultural similarities and differences in shopping for food. J. Bus. Res. 1998, 42, 145–150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Grunert, K.G. International segmentation in the food domain: Issues and approaches. Food Res. Int. 2019, 115, 311–318. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Yi, N.Y.; Choi, B.R.; Chang, H.J. Opinion of commercialization of ready-to-eat Korean foods by food-related lifestyle segments in Koreans and non-Koreans. J. Korean Soc. Food Sci. Nutr. 2016, 45, 602–612. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Buckley, M.; Cowan, C.; McCarthy, M.; O’Sullivan, C. The Convenience Consumer and Food-Related Lifestyles in Great Britain. J. Food Prod. Mark. 2005, 11, 3–25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Medina, C.A.G.; Martinez-Fiestas, M.; Viedma-del-Jesús, M.I.; Casado Aranda, L.A. The processing of price during purchase decision making: Are there neural differences among prosocial and non-prosocial consumers? J. Clean. Prod. 2020, 271, 122648. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nova-Reyes, A.; Muñoz-Leiva, F.; Luque-Martínez, T. The Tipping Point in the Status of Socially Responsible Consumer Behavior Research? A Bibliometric Analysis. Sustainability 2020, 12, 3141. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Anusha, A.C.S.; Tunung, R.; Kavita, C.; Ribka, A.; Chandrika, M. Ready-to-eat food consumption practices, food safety knowledge and relation to gender and education level of consumers in Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia. Food Res. 2020, 4, 1537–1544. [Google Scholar]
- McQuiston, D. Successful branding of a commodity product. J. Ind. Mark. Manag. 2005, 33, 345–354. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wycherley, A.; McCarthy, M.; Cowan, C. Speciality food orientation of food related lifestyle (FRL) segments in Great Britain. Food Qual. Prefer. 2008, 19, 498–510. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Grunert, K.G.; Brunsø, K.; Bredahl, L.; Bech, A.C. Food-Related Lifestyle: A Segmentation Approach to European Food Consumers. In Food, People and Society; Frewer, L.J., Risvik, E., Schifferstein, H., Eds.; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2001. [Google Scholar]
- Grunert, K.G.; Brunsø, K.; Bisp, S. Food-Related Life Style: Development of a Cross-Culturally Valid Instrument for Market Surveillance; MAPP Working Paper, no. 12; The Aarhus School of Business: Aarhus, Denmark, 1993. [Google Scholar]
- Żakowska-Biemans, S. Polish consumer food choices and beliefs about organic food. Bri. Food J. 2011, 113, 122–137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bernués, A.; Ripoll, G.; Panea, B. Consumer segmentation based on convenience orientation and attitudes towards quality attributes of lamb meat. Food Qual. Prefer. 2012, 26, 211–220. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Witzling, L.; Shaw, B.R. Lifestyle segmentation and political ideology: Toward understanding beliefs and behavior about local food. Appetite 2019, 132, 106–113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Zepeda, L.; Nie, C. What are the odds of being an organic or local food shopper? Multivariate analysis of US food shopper lifestyle segments. Agric. Hum. Values 2012, 29, 467–480. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Geldsetzer, P. Use of rapid online surveys to assess People’s perceptions during infectious disease outbreaks: A cross-sectional survey on COVID-19. J. Med. Internet Res. 2020, 22, e18790. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Gargon, E.; Crew, R.; Burnside, G.; Williamson, P.R. Higher number of items associated with significantly lower response rates in COS Delphi surveys. J. Clin. Epidemiol. 2019, 108, 110–120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Toepoel, V.; Das, M.; Van Soest, A. Design of web questionnaires: The effects of the number of items per screen. Field Methods 2009, 21, 200–213. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- De Lillo, A.; Argentin, G.; Lucchini, M.; Sarti, S.; Terraneo, M. Analisi Multivariata per le Scienze Sociali; Pearson Paravia Bruno Mondadori: Piacenza, Italy, 2007. [Google Scholar]
- Verma, S. Do all advertising appeals influence consumer purchase decision: An exploratory study. Glob. Bus. Rev. 2009, 10, 33–43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rabobank. Consumer Trends Defining Packaging Hot Spots. Available online: https://research.rabobank.com/far/en/sectors/fa-supply-chains/all_wrapped_up.html (accessed on 2 July 2020).
- Stasi, A.; Colelli, G.; Garini, F. Chapter 5—Fruits and Vegetables. In Innovations in Traditional Foods; Charis Galanakis, M., Ed.; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2019; pp. 101–126. [Google Scholar]
- Cassady, D.; Jetter, K.M.; Culp, J. Is price a barrier to eating more fruits and vegetables for low-income families? J. Am. Diet. Assoc. 2007, 107, 1909–1915. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Scholderer, J.; Grunert, K.G. Consumers, food and convenience: The long way from resource constraints to actual consumption patterns. J. Econ. Psychol. 2005, 26, 105–128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yeo, G.E.; Cho, M.S.; Oh, J. Food-related lifestyle segmentation and beverage attribute’ selection: Toward understanding of sugar-reduced beverages choice. Br. Food J. 2020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ragaert, P.; Verbeke, W.; Devlieghere, F.; Debevere, J. Consumer perception and choice of minimally processed vegetables and packaged fruits. Food Qual. Prefer. 2004, 15, 259–270. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fang, C.H.; Lee, H.J. Food-related lifestyle segments in Taiwan: Application of the food-related Lifestyle instrument. Am. J. Appl. Sci. 2009, 6, 2036–2042. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Fenko, A.; Leufkens, J.M.; Van Hoof, J.J. New product, familiar taste: Effects of slogans on cognitive and affective responses to an unknown food product among food neophobics and neophilics. Food Qual. Prefer. 2015, 39, 268–276. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Palmieri, N.; Simeone, M.; Russo, C.; Perito, M.A. Profiling young consumers’ perceptions of GMO products: A case study on Italian undergraduate students. Int. J. Gastron. Food Sci. 2020, 21, 100224. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Verneau, F.; Caracciolo, F.; Coppola, A.; Lombardi, P. Consumer fears and familiarity of processed food. The value of information provided by the FTNS. Appetite 2014, 73, 140–146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Goulart, G.S.; Viana, M.M.; Lucchese-Cheung, T. Consumer perception towards familiar and innovative foods: The case of a Brazilian product. Br. Food J. 2020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nyberg, M.; Olsson, V.; Wendin, K. Reasons for eating insects? Responses and reflections among Swedish consumers. Int. J. Gastron. Food Sci. 2020, 22, 10026. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Andorfer, V.A. Ethical Consumers. In International Encyclopedia of the Social & Behavioral Sciences, 2nd ed.; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2015; pp. 25–30. [Google Scholar]
- Caracciolo, F.; Vecchio, R.; Lerro, M.; Migliore, G.; Schifani, G.; Cembalo, L. Natural versus enriched food: Evidence from a laboratory experiment with chewing gum. Food Res. Int. 2019, 122, 87–95. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Migliore, G.; Forno, F.; Dara Guccione, G.; Schifani, G. Food Community Networks as sustainable self-organized collective action: A case study of a solidarity purchasing group. New Medit 2014, 13, 54–62. [Google Scholar]
- Nyilasy, G.; Gangadharbatla, H.; Paladino, A. Perceived Greenwashing: The Interactive Effects of Green Advertising and Corporate Environmental Performance on Consumer Reactions. J. Bus. Ethics 2014, 125, 693–707. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Stranieri, S.; Ricci, E.C.; Banterle, A. Convenience food with environmentally-sustainable attributes: A consumer perspective. Appetite 2017, 116, 11–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Sabbe, S.; Verbeke, W.; Deliza, R.; Matta, V.; Van Damme, P. Effect of a health claim and personal characteristics on consumer acceptance of fruit juices with different concentrations of açaí (Euterpe oleracea Mart.). Appetite 2009, 53, 84–92. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Borsellino, V.; Kaliji, S.A.; Schimmenti, E. COVID-19 Drives Consumer Behaviour and Agro-Food Markets towards Healthier and More Sustainable Patterns. Sustainability 2020, 12, 8366. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Dimensions | Items | Mean Scores | St. Deviation |
---|---|---|---|
Importance of product information | To me product information is of major importance. I want to know what the product contains. | 4.8 | 1.4 |
I compare labels to select the most nutritious food. | |||
I compare product information labels to decide which brand to try. | |||
Attitudes to advertising | I have more confidence in food products that I have seen advertised than in unadvertised products. | 3.7 | 1.8 |
I am influenced by what people say about a food product. | |||
Information from advertising helps me make better buying decisions. | |||
Specialty shops | I do not see any reason to shop in specialty food stores. (Reversed) | 4.6 | 1.3 |
I like buying food products in specialty food stores where I can get expert advice. | |||
I like to know what I am buying, so I often ask questions in stores where I shop for food. | |||
Price criteria | I always check prices, even on small items. | 5.0 | 1.4 |
I notice when products I buy regularly change in price. | |||
I watch for ads in the newspaper for store specials and plan to take advantage of them when I go shopping. | |||
Health | I prefer to buy natural products, i.e., products without preservatives. | 5.5 | 1.3 |
To me the naturalness of the food that I buy is an important quality. | |||
I try to avoid food products with additives. | |||
Novelty | I love to try recipes from foreign countries. | 5.1 | 1.5 |
I like to try new foods that I have never tasted before. | |||
Well-known recipes are indeed the best. (Reversed) | |||
Organic products | I always buy organically grown food products if I have the opportunity. | 2.8 | 1.8 |
I make a point of using natural or organic products. | |||
I don’t mind paying a premium for organic products. (Reversed) | |||
Taste | I find the taste of food products important. | 4.6 | 1.0 |
When cooking, I first and foremost consider the taste. | |||
It is more important to choose food products for their taste rather than for their nutritional value. | |||
Freshness | I prefer fresh products to canned or frozen products. | 5.8 | 0.9 |
It is important to me that food products are fresh. | |||
I prefer to buy meat and vegetables fresh rather than pre-packed. | |||
Interest in cooking | I like to have ample time in the kitchen. | 3.5 | 1.8 |
Cooking is a task that is best over and done with. | |||
I don’t like spending too much time on cooking. (Reversed) | |||
Looking for new ways | I like to try out new recipes. | 4.9 | 1.4 |
I look for ways to prepare unusual meals. | |||
Recipes and articles on food from other culinary traditions make me experiment in the kitchen. | |||
Convenience | I use a lot of frozen foods in my cooking. | 3.5 | 1.5 |
We use a lot of ready-to-eat foods in our household. | |||
I use a lot of mixes, for instance baking mixes and instant soups. | |||
Planning | What we are going to have for supper is very often a spontaneous decision. (Reversed) | 2.6 | 0.9 |
Cooking needs to be planned in advance. | |||
I always plan what we are going to eat a couple of days in advance. | |||
Security | I dislike everything that might change my eating habits. | 4.1 | 0.8 |
I only buy and eat foods that are familiar to me. | |||
A familiar dish gives me a sense of security. |
No. | Percentage | |
---|---|---|
Age | ||
27–39 | 60 | 29.8 |
40–49 | 65 | 32.1 |
50–59 | 54 | 27.1 |
60 or older | 22 | 11.0 |
Household Size | ||
1 person | 30 | 14.9 |
2–3 persons | 103 | 51.3 |
4–5 persons | 61 | 30.2 |
More than 5 persons | 7 | 3.6 |
Education | ||
Primary school | 3 | 1.6 |
Lower secondary school | 28 | 14.1 |
Upper secondary school | 71 | 35.5 |
University degree or higher | 66 | 32.8 |
N/A | 32 | 16 |
Net Monthly Household Income | ||
<EUR 540 | 1 | 0.6 |
EUR 540–2159 | 17 | 8.5 |
EUR 2160–3860 | 94 | 47.0 |
EUR 3861–5561 | 47 | 23.2 |
EUR 5562–8000 | 11 | 5.6 |
N/A | 30 | 15.1 |
Principal Components/ Macro-Dimensions | Dimensions | Factors Loading |
---|---|---|
Critical consumption | Organic products | 0.921 |
Health | 0.921 | |
Freshness | 0.742 | |
Importance of product information | 0.683 | |
Specialty shop | 0.522 | |
Convenience consumption | Convenience | 0.772 |
Attitudes to advertising | 0.752 | |
Interest in cooking | −0.706 | |
Neophiliac consumption | Looking for new ways | 0.846 |
Novelty | 0.839 | |
Security | −0.495 | |
Pragmatic consumption | Taste | 0.680 |
Planning | 0.585 | |
Price criteria | 0.531 | |
Age and Income | Age (continuous variable) | −0.583 |
Income (categorical variable) | −0.554 | |
Educational level and Family size | Education (categorical variable) | 0.728 |
Family size (categorical variable) | −0.709 |
Principal Components | Consumer Targets | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Neophiliacs (18.9%) | Uninvolved (34.7%) | Value Seeking (28.7%) | Health Oriented (17.7%) | |
Critical consumption | −0.11461 | 0.08052 | −1.10679 | 0.84397 |
Convenience consumption | −0.66067 | 0.99250 | 0.48203 | −0.41389 |
Neophiliac consumption | 0.65696 | 0.14651 | −0.23914 | −0.72298 |
Pragmatic consumption | −0.20955 | −0.68436 | 0.76042 | 0.29234 |
Age and Income | −0.28179 | −0.03575 | −0.03474 | 0.55982 |
Education and Family size | −0.21745 | −0.36555 | 0.50561 | −0.08673 |
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. |
© 2021 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Testa, R.; Schifani, G.; Migliore, G. Understanding Consumers’ Convenience Orientation. An Exploratory Study of Fresh-Cut Fruit in Italy. Sustainability 2021, 13, 1027. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13031027
Testa R, Schifani G, Migliore G. Understanding Consumers’ Convenience Orientation. An Exploratory Study of Fresh-Cut Fruit in Italy. Sustainability. 2021; 13(3):1027. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13031027
Chicago/Turabian StyleTesta, Riccardo, Giorgio Schifani, and Giuseppina Migliore. 2021. "Understanding Consumers’ Convenience Orientation. An Exploratory Study of Fresh-Cut Fruit in Italy" Sustainability 13, no. 3: 1027. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13031027
APA StyleTesta, R., Schifani, G., & Migliore, G. (2021). Understanding Consumers’ Convenience Orientation. An Exploratory Study of Fresh-Cut Fruit in Italy. Sustainability, 13(3), 1027. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13031027