Transit-Oriented Development: Exploring Citizen Perceptions in a Booming City, Can Tho City, Vietnam
Abstract
:1. Introduction
2. Literature Review
2.1. Transit-Oriented Development (TOD)
2.2. Factors Influencing the Citizens’ Perceptions of TOD
3. Methodology
3.1. Can Tho City Context
3.2. Expert Interviews
3.3. Questionnaire Surveys
3.4. Exploratory Factor Analysis (EFA)
3.5. Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA)
4. Results and Discussion
4.1. The Discriminant Validity
4.2. Structural Equation Modeling (SEM)
4.3. Model Fit
4.4. Discussions
5. Conclusions
Supplementary Materials
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Renne, J.L. Transit-Oriented Development: Developing a Strategy to Measure Success; Transportation Research Board: Washington, DC, USA, 2005. [Google Scholar]
- Knowles, R.D. Transit oriented development in Copenhagen, Denmark: From the finger plan to Orestad. J. Transp. Geogr. 2012, 22, 251–261. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Acampa, G.; Contino, F.; Grasso, M.; Ticali, D. Evaluation of Infrastructure: Application of TOD to Catania Underground Metro Station. AIP Conf. Proc. 2019, 2186, 160010. [Google Scholar]
- Newman, P. Planning for Transit-Oriented Development: Strategic Principles. In Transit-Oriented Development–Making it Happen; Curtis, C., Renne, J.L., Bertolini, L., Eds.; Ashgate: Farnham, UK, 2009; Chapter 2. [Google Scholar]
- Curtis, C. Delivering the ‘D’ in transit-oriented development: Examining the town planning challenge. J. Transp. Land Use 2012, 5, 83–99. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- World Bank. Vietnam 2035: Toward Prosperity, Creativity, Equity, and Democracy; World Bank Group: Washington, DC, USA, 2016. [Google Scholar]
- Staricco, L.; Brovarone, E.V. Promoting TOD through regional planning. A comparative analysis of two European approaches. J. Transp. Geogr. 2018, 66, 45–52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Torrisi, V.; Garau, C.; Ignaccolo, M.; Inturri, G. Sustainable Urban Mobility Plans: Key Concepts and a Critical Revision on SUMPs Guidelines. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Computational Science and Its Applications ICCSA 2020, Cagliari, Italy, 1–4 July 2020; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2020; pp. 613–628. [Google Scholar]
- Campisi, T.; Akgün, N.; Ticali, D.; Tesoriere, G. Exploring public opinion on personal mobility vehicle use: A case study in Palermo, Italy. Sustainability 2020, 12, 5460. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tesoriere, G.; Campisi, T. The Benefit of Engage the “Crowd” Encouraging a Bottom-Up Approach for Shared Mobility Rating. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Computational Science and Its Applications ICCSA 2020, Cagliari, Italy, 1–4 July 2020; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2020; pp. 836–850. [Google Scholar]
- Nikolaidou, A.; Papaioannou, P. Utilizing social media in transport planning and public transit quality: Survey of literature. J. Transp. Eng. Part A Syst. 2018, 144, 04018007. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hair, J.F.; Black, W.C.; Babin, B.J.; Anderson, R.E. Multivariate Data Analysis: Pearson New International Edition; Pearson: London, UK, 2014. [Google Scholar]
- Rossetti, S.; Tiboni, M. How do citizens perceive road safety and mobility? The role of opinion surveys and examples from the ROSEE project. WIT Trans. Ecol. Environ. 2014, 191, 571–582. [Google Scholar]
- Calthorpe, P. The Next American Metropolis: Ecology, Community, and the American Dream; Princeton Architectural Press: New York, NY, USA, 1993. [Google Scholar]
- Bernick, M.; Cervero, R. Transit Villages in the 21st Century; McGraw Hill: New York, NY, USA, 1997. [Google Scholar]
- TransLink. Transit-Oriented Communities Guidelines. Creating More Livable Places Around Transit in Metro Vancouver; TransLink: Vancouver, BC, Canada, 2012. [Google Scholar]
- Cervero, R. Transit-Oriented Development in the United States: Experiences, Challenges, and Prospects; Transportation Research Board: Washington, DC, USA, 2004; Volume 102. [Google Scholar]
- Duncan, M. The impact of transit-oriented development on housing prices in San Diego, CA. Urban Stud. 2011, 48, 101–127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Hess, D.B.; Lombardi, P.A. Policy support for and barriers to transit-oriented development in the inner city: Literature review. Transp. Res. Rec. 2004, 1887, 26–33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Nasri, A.; Zhang, L. The analysis of transit-oriented development (TOD) in Washington, D.C. and Baltimore metropolitan areas. Transp. Policy 2014, 32, 172–179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jacobson, J.; Forsyth, A. Seven American TODs: Good practices for urban design in transit-oriented development projects. J. Transp. Land Use 2008, 1, 51–88. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Kimball, M.; Chester, M.; Gino, C.; Reyna, J. Assessing the potential for reducing life-cycle environmental impacts through transit-oriented development infill along existing light rail in Phoenix. J. Plan. Educ. Res. 2013, 33, 395–410. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dittmar, H.; Poticha, S. Defining transit-oriented development: The new regional building block. In The New Transit Town: Best Practices in Transit-Oriented Development; Island Press: Washington, DC, USA, 2004; pp. 19–40. [Google Scholar]
- Pongprasert, P.; Kubota, H. TOD residents’ attitudes toward walking to transit station: A case study of transit-oriented developments (TODs) in Bangkok, Thailand. J. Mod. Transp. 2019, 27, 39–51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Taki, H.M.; Maatouk, M.M.H.; Qurnfulah, E.M.; Aljoufie, M.O. Planning TOD with land use and transport integration: A review. J. Geosci. Eng. Environ. Technol. 2017, 2, 84–94. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Niles, J.; Nelson, D. Measuring the Success of Transit-Oriented Development: Retail Market Dynamics and Other Key Determinants. In Proceedings of the 1999 APA National Planning Conference, Seattle, WA, USA, 24–28 April 1999; p. 2003. [Google Scholar]
- Loo, B.P.; Chen, C.; Chan, E.T. Rail-based transit-oriented development: Lessons from New York City and Hong Kong. Landsc. Urban Plan. 2010, 97, 202–212. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Iseki, H.; Taylor, B.D. Style versus service? An analysis of user perceptions of transit stops and stations. J. Public Transp. 2010, 13, 2. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hazen, B.T.; Overstreet, R.E.; Wang, Y. Predicting public bicycle adoption using the technology acceptance model. Sustainability 2015, 7, 14558–14573. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Hendricks, S.J.; Winters, P.; Wambalaba, F.; Barbeau, S.; Catala, M.; Thomas, K.; Goodwill, J. Impacts of Transit Oriented Development on Public Transportation Ridership; National Center for Transit Research, University of South Florida: Tampa, FL, USA, 2005. [Google Scholar]
- Shiftan, Y.; Outwater, M.L.; Zhou, Y. Transit market research using structural equation modeling and attitudinal market segmentation. Transp. Policy 2008, 15, 186–195. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Abdallah, T. Sustainable Mass Transit: Challenges and Opportunities in Urban Public Transportation; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2017. [Google Scholar]
- Paulley, N.; Balcombe, R.; Mackett, R.; Titheridge, H.; Preston, J.; Wardman, M.; Shires, J.; White, P. The demand for public transport: The effects of fares, quality of service, income and car ownership. Transp. Policy 2006, 13, 295–306. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- General Statisics Office. Statistical Yearbook of Vietnam 2019; Statistical Publishing House: Hanoi, Vietnam, 2020; p. 1034. [Google Scholar]
- General Statisics Office. Population Projections for Vietnam 2009–2049; Ministry of Planning and Investment: Hanoi, Vietnam, 2011.
- Can Tho City People’s Committee. Decision No. 3522/QD-UBND of 24 November 2015 Approving “The Adjustment of Transportation Planning of Can Tho City Towards 2030”. 2015. [Google Scholar]
- Can Tho City People’s Committee. Decision No. 1254/QD-UBND of 16 May 2018 Approving the Scheme “Building Mechanisms and Policies to Encourage and Develop Public Transportation in Can Tho City in the Period of 2016–2020 and Orientation After 2020”. 2018. [Google Scholar]
- Poleacovschi, C.; Javernick-Will, A. Who are the experts? Assessing expertise in construction and engineering organizations. J. Constr. Eng. Manag. 2017, 143, 04017033. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cochran, W.G. Sampling Techniques; John Wiley & Sons: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2007. [Google Scholar]
- Chen, J.-H.; Hsu, S. Quantifying impact factors of corporate financing: Engineering consulting firms. J. Manag. Eng. 2008, 24, 96–104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hair, J.F.; Babin, B.J.; Krey, N. Covariance-Based Structural Equation Modeling in theJournal of Advertising: Review and Recommendations. J. Advert. 2017, 46, 163–177. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Fornell, C.; Larcker, D.F. Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. J. Mark. Res. 1981, 18, 39–50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kline, R.B. Principles and Practice of Structural Equation Modeling; Guilford Press: New York, NY, USA, 2015. [Google Scholar]
- Lei, P.W.; Wu, Q. Introduction to structural equation modeling: Issues and practical considerations. Educ. Meas. Issues Pract. 2007, 26, 33–43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Plant, J. Handbook of Transportation Policy and Administration; CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 2007. [Google Scholar]
- Renne, J.L. Measuring the success of transit oriented development. In Transit Oriented Development; Routledge: Abingdon, UK, 2016; pp. 261–276. [Google Scholar]
- Renne, J.L. Transit Oriented Development: Making it Happen; Routledge: Abingdon, UK, 2016. [Google Scholar]
Aspects | Measurement Items | Item No. |
---|---|---|
Local Government Capacity | Smart growth is very important for Can Tho | A1 |
Can Tho places priority on investing in smart mobility and infrastructure | A2 | |
The value which is attached to Can Tho | A3 | |
Can Tho incorporates sustainable energy consumption | A4 | |
Can Tho incorporates accessible public transport | A5 | |
Can Tho has a specific TOD precinct plan | A6 | |
Can Tho coordinates land use planning to provide incentives for TOD investments | A7 | |
Can Tho encourages TOD by an active public-private partnership | A8 | |
Can Tho is acting towards sustainable development | A9 | |
Can Tho offers policies relate to sustainable development | A10 | |
TOD Usefulness | TOD provides mobility choices | B1 |
TOD can help increase disposable income | B2 | |
TOD can help save time because it eases traffic congestion | B3 | |
TOD can contribute to more affordable housing | B4 | |
TOD can offer a safer means by public transport | B5 | |
TOD can help release the stress from not needing to find a parking slot | B6 | |
TOD can help reduce air pollution | B7 | |
TOD can help reduce oil consumption rates | B8 | |
TOD can help conserve land resources and open spaces | B9 | |
TOD can provide a comfortable trip | B10 | |
TOD can help the users having more time to enjoy life (reading a book, listening to music, chatting...) while traveling by public transport | B11 | |
TOD can help the users having a healthier life by walking as an exercise from the stations to the destinations | B12 | |
Public Transport | Public transport is an easy-to-use system | C1 |
The process to use public transport is simple | C2 | |
The payment method is simple | C3 | |
Using public transport is a status symbol for modern citizens. | C4 | |
It is a wise choice to use public transport | C5 | |
Public transport is suitable for everyone | C6 | |
I will continue to use public transport in the future | C7 | |
I will encourage friends and relatives to use public transport | C8 | |
Public transport is the top-of-mind service when I need to travel | C9 |
Characteristic | Category | Quantity | Percentage |
---|---|---|---|
Gender | Male | 428 | 57% |
Female | 321 | 43% | |
Age | 20–25 | 369 | 49% |
26–35 | 173 | 23% | |
36–45 | 120 | 16% | |
46–55 | 56 | 7% | |
>55 | 31 | 4% | |
Education | High school and under | 316 | 42% |
Bachelor’s | 300 | 40% | |
Master’s and above | 133 | 18% | |
Occupation | White-collar | 399 | 53% |
Blue-collar | 182 | 24% | |
Freelance | 101 | 13% | |
Retired/Others | 67 | 9% |
Aspects | Variables | Cronbach’s α |
---|---|---|
Local Government capacity | A2, A3, A4, A5, A6, A7, A8, A9, A10 | 0.892 |
TOD usefulness | B1, B2, B3, B4, B5, B6, B7, B8, B9, B10, B11, B12 | 0.873 |
Public transport | C1, C2, C3, C4, C5, C6, C7, C8, C9 | 0.841 |
Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin of Sampling Adequacy | 0.905 | |
Bartlett’s Test | Approx. Chi-Square | 10,518.057 |
df | 435 | |
Sig. | 0.000 |
Factor | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | |
A6 | 0.777 | |||||||
A8 | 0.769 | |||||||
A10 | 0.748 | |||||||
A7 | 0.734 | |||||||
A4 | 0.729 | |||||||
A5 | 0.719 | |||||||
B12 | 0.811 | |||||||
B10 | 0.763 | |||||||
B11 | 0.760 | |||||||
B5 | 0.755 | |||||||
B6 | 0.569 | |||||||
B2 | 0.750 | |||||||
B1 | 0.741 | |||||||
B3 | 0.695 | |||||||
B4 | 0.608 | |||||||
C8 | 0.813 | |||||||
C9 | 0.798 | |||||||
C7 | 0.772 | |||||||
C1 | 0.888 | |||||||
C2 | 0.790 | |||||||
C3 | 0.668 | |||||||
C4 | 0.810 | |||||||
C5 | 0.716 | |||||||
C6 | 0.627 | |||||||
A2 | 0.775 | |||||||
A3 | 0.772 | |||||||
A9 | 0.760 | |||||||
B9 | 0.791 | |||||||
B7 | 0.693 | |||||||
B8 | 0.688 |
Factors | Measurement Items |
---|---|
Prioritizing sustainable development | A2, A3, A9 |
Supporting policy | A4, A5, A6, A7, A8, A10 |
Economic efficiency | B1, B2, B3, B4 |
Social efficiency | B5, B6, B10, B11, B12 |
Environmental efficiency | B7, B8, B9 |
Simple to use | C1, C2, C3 |
Supporting attitude | C4, C5, C6 |
Citizen Engagement | C7, C8, C9 |
CR | AVE | |
---|---|---|
Supporting Attitude | 0.765 | 0.521 |
Supporting Policy | 0.884 | 0.560 |
Prioritizing Sustainable Development | 0.841 | 0.638 |
Environment Efficiency | 0.769 | 0.527 |
Economic Efficiency | 0.816 | 0.526 |
Social Efficiency | 0.861 | 0.554 |
Simple to Use | 0.847 | 0.650 |
Citizen Engagement | 0.838 | 0.634 |
Env | Pol | Soc | Eco | Sim | Eng | Pri | Sup | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Environment (Env) | 0.722 | |||||||
Policy (Pol) | 0.224 | 0.748 | ||||||
Social (Soc) | 0.106 | 0.647 | 0.799 | |||||
Economic (Eco) | 0.350 | 0.299 | 0.121 | 0.726 | ||||
Simple to use (Sim) | 0.310 | 0.343 | 0.242 | 0.556 | 0.725 | |||
Engagement (Eng) | 0.246 | 0.165 | 0.177 | 0.435 | 0.624 | 0.745 | ||
Priority (Pri) | 0.489 | 0.245 | 0.240 | 0.273 | 0.450 | 0.540 | 0.806 | |
Support (Sup) | 0.409 | 0.328 | 0.368 | 0.360 | 0.493 | 0.518 | 0.576 | 0.796 |
Citizen Engagement | Local Government | TOD Usefulness | Transit Usefulness | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Citizen Engagement | 0.796 | |||
Local Government | 0.428 | 0.805 | ||
TOD Usefulness | 0.627 | 0.380 | 0.740 | |
Transit Usefulness | 0.685 | 0.358 | 0.694 | 0.725 |
Path | Path Coefficient | T-Value | Hypothesis Verification |
---|---|---|---|
Local Government → Citizen engagement | 0.000 | 3.773 | H1 is supported |
TOD usefulness → Citizen engagement | 0.002 | 3.153 | H2 is supported |
Transit usefulness → Citizen engagement | 0.000 | 4.843 | H3 is supported |
Local Government → Prioritizing SD | |||
Local Government → Supporting Policy | 0.000 | 8.610 | |
TOD usefulness → Economic Efficiency | |||
TOD usefulness → Social Efficiency | 0.000 | 12.456 | |
TOD usefulness → Environmental Efficiency | 0.000 | 10.784 | |
Transit usefulness → Simple to use | |||
Transit usefulness → Support attitude | 0.000 | 9.057 |
Value | |
---|---|
Root mean square error of approximation (RMSEA) | 0.035 |
Goodness of fit index (GFI) | 0.939 |
Tucker-Lews index (TLI) | 0.962 |
Confirmatory fit index (CFI) | 0.966 |
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. |
© 2021 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Chen, J.-H.; Nguyen, H.T.T.; Chou, C.-C.; Wang, J.-P.; Wang, T.-K. Transit-Oriented Development: Exploring Citizen Perceptions in a Booming City, Can Tho City, Vietnam. Sustainability 2021, 13, 1370. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13031370
Chen J-H, Nguyen HTT, Chou C-C, Wang J-P, Wang T-K. Transit-Oriented Development: Exploring Citizen Perceptions in a Booming City, Can Tho City, Vietnam. Sustainability. 2021; 13(3):1370. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13031370
Chicago/Turabian StyleChen, Jieh-Haur, Ha Thi Thu Nguyen, Chien-Cheng Chou, Jui-Pin Wang, and Ting-Kwei Wang. 2021. "Transit-Oriented Development: Exploring Citizen Perceptions in a Booming City, Can Tho City, Vietnam" Sustainability 13, no. 3: 1370. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13031370
APA StyleChen, J. -H., Nguyen, H. T. T., Chou, C. -C., Wang, J. -P., & Wang, T. -K. (2021). Transit-Oriented Development: Exploring Citizen Perceptions in a Booming City, Can Tho City, Vietnam. Sustainability, 13(3), 1370. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13031370