Equilibrium Relationship between Ecosystem Service Supply and Consumption Driven by Economic Development and Ecological Restoration
Abstract
:1. Introduction
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Study Area
2.2. Data Sources
2.3. Quantify the Supply and Consumption of Ecosystem Services
2.3.1. Food Supply (FS) and Food Consumption (FC)
2.3.2. Water Supply (WS) and Water Consumption (WC)
2.3.3. Atmospheric Regulation Supply (AS) and Atmospheric Regulation Consumption (AC)
2.4. Equilibrium Relationship between Ecosystem Service Supply and Consumption
2.4.1. Quantity Equilibrium between Ecosystem Service Supply and Consumption
2.4.2. Spatial Equilibrium between Ecosystem Services Supply and Consumption
2.5. Impact of Economic Development on the Equilibrium Relationship between Ecosystem Service Supply and Consumption
3. Results
3.1. Spatial Pattern Evolution of Ecosystem Service Supply Driven by Ecological Restoration and Economic Development
3.1.1. The Spatial Evolution of Food Supply
3.1.2. Spatial Evolution of Water Supply
3.1.3. Spatial Evolution of Atmospheric Regulation Supply
3.2. Spatial Pattern Evolution of Ecosystem Service Consumption Driven by Ecological Restoration and Economic Development
3.2.1. Spatial Evolution of Food Consumption
3.2.2. Spatial Evolution of Water Consumption
3.2.3. Spatial Evolution of Atmospheric Regulation Consumption
3.3. Spatial Pattern Evolution of Equilibrium Relationship between Ecosystem Service Supply and Consumption Driven by Ecological Restoration and Economic Development
3.3.1. Equilibrium Relationship between Food Supply and Consumption
3.3.2. Equilibrium Relationship between Water Supply and Consumption
3.3.3. Equilibrium Relationship between Atmospheric Regulation Supply and Consumption
3.4. Spatial Relationship between Ecosystem Services Supply and Consumption Driven by Ecological Restoration and Economic Development
3.4.1. Spatial Relationship between Food Supply and Consumption
3.4.2. Spatial Relationship between Water Supply and Consumption
3.4.3. Spatial Relationship between Atmospheric Regulation Supply and Consumption
3.5. Impact of Economic Development on the Equilibrium Relationship between Ecosystem Service Supply and Consumption
4. Discussion
4.1. Ecosystem Service Supply and Consumption Evolution Driven by Economic Development and Ecological Restoration
4.2. Significance of Analyzing the Relationship between Ecosystem Service Supply and Consumption
4.3. Integrating Ecological and Economic Approaches
5. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Data Availability Statement
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Costanza, R.; d’Arge, R.; De Groot, R.; Farber, S.; Grasso, M.; Hannon, B.; Limburg, K.; Naeem, S.; O’Neill, R.V.; Paruelo, J.; et al. The value of the world’s ecosystem services and natural capital. Nature 1997, 387, 253–260. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shen, S.; Chen, X.; Han, M. Industrial Restructuring and Spatial Distribution of Northeast Revitalization—Comprehensive Analysis Based on Revitalization Goals, Resource Advantages and Logistics Costs. Econ. Rev. J. 2020, 6, 102–108. [Google Scholar]
- Etter, A.; Andrade, A.; Nelson, C.R.; Cortés, J.; Saavedra, K. Assessing restoration priorities for high-risk ecosystems: An application of the IUCN red list of ecosystems. Land Use Policy 2020, 99, 104874. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lee, L.J.; Brown, M.T. Estimating the Value of Global Ecosystem Structure and Productivity: A Geographic Information System and Emergy Based Approach. Ecol. Model. 2021, 439, 109307. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cao, S.; Wang, X.; Song, Y.; Chen, L.; Feng, Q. Impacts of the Natural Forest Conservation Program on the livelihoods of residents of Northwestern China: Perceptions of residents affected by the program. Ecol. Econ. 2010, 69, 1454–1462. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mehring, M.; Zajonz, U.; Hummel, D. Social-Ecological Dynamics of Ecosystem Services: Livelihoods and the Functional Relation between Ecosystem Service Supply and Demand—Evidence from Socotra Archipelago, Yemen and the Sahel Region, West Africa. Sustainability 2017, 9, 1037. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Kauano, É.E.; Silva, J.M.C.; Diniz Filho, J.A.F.; Michalski, F. Do protected areas hamper economic development of the Amazon region? An analysis of the relationship between protected areas and the economic growth of Brazilian Amazon municipalities. Land Use Policy 2020, 92, 104473. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Khalili, N.R.; Duecker, S.; Ashton, W.; Chavez, F. From cleaner production to sustainable development: The role of academia. J. Clean. Prod. 2015, 96, 30–43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fenta, A.A.; Tsunekawa, A.; Haregeweyn, N.; Tsubo, M.; Yasuda, H.; Shimizu, K.; Kawaia, T.; Ebabuae, K.; Liyew Berihunaf, M.; Sultanf, D.; et al. Cropland expansion outweighs the monetary effect of declining natural vegetation on ecosystem services in sub-Saharan Africa. Ecosyst. Serv. 2020, 45, 101154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kindu, M.; Schneider, T.; Teketay, D.; Knoke, T. Changes of ecosystem service values in response to land use/land cover dynamics in Munessa–Shashemene landscape of the Ethiopian highlands. Sci. Total Environ. 2016, 547, 137–147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lengefeld, E.; Metternicht, G.; Nedungadi, P. Behavior change and sustainability of ecological restoration projects. Restor. Ecol. 2020, 28, 724–729. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, J.; Zhou, W.; Steward, T.; Pickett, S.T.; Yu, W.; Li, W. A multiscale analysis of urbanization effects on ecosystem services supply in an urban megaregion. Sci. Total Environ. 2019, 662, 824–833. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Sun, X.; Crittenden, J.C.; Li, F.; Lu, Z.; Dou, X. Urban expansion simulation and the spatio-temporal changes of ecosystem services, a case study in Atlanta Metropolitan area, USA. Sci. Total Environ. 2018, 622, 974–987. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Maes, M.J.A.; Jones, K.E.; Toledano, M.B.; Milligan, B. Mapping synergies and trade-offs between urban ecosystems and the sustainable development goals. Environ. Sci. Policy 2019, 93, 181–188. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Daily, C. Nature’s Services: Societal Dependence on Natural Ecosystems; Island Press: Washington, DC, USA, 1997. [Google Scholar]
- Peña, L.; Casado-Arzuaga, I.; Onaindia, M. Mapping recreation supply and demand using an ecological and a social evaluation approach. Ecosyst. Serv. 2015, 13, 108–118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Barbeau, C.D.; Oelbermann, M.; Karagatzides, J.D.; Tsuji, L.J. Sustainable agriculture and climate change: Producing potatoes (Solanum tuberosum L.) and bush beans (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) for improved food security and resilience in a Canadian subarctic first nations community. Sustainability 2015, 7, 5664–5681. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Wu, W.; Xia, T.; Hu, Q. Study on mutual transformation spatial and temporal pattern and its water resources effect between paddy field and dryland in Heilongjiang province from 1980 to 2015. Chin. J. Agric. Resour. Reg. Plan. 2019, 40, 142–151. [Google Scholar]
- Li, M.; Zhou, X. Positive and negative ecosystem services evaluation andits spatial pattern analysis on urban landscape: A case study of Xi’an City. Acta Geogr. Sin. 2016, 71, 1215–1230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Han, B.; Zhou, X. Evaluation on ecosystem services in haze absorption by urbangreen land and its spatial pattern analysis in Xi’an. Geogr. Res. 2015, 34, 1247–1258. [Google Scholar]
- Li, L.; Gao, X.; Su, H. Characteristic analysis of a wide range haze in Liaoning. J. Shenyang Agric. Univ. 2019, 50, 266–272. [Google Scholar]
- Feng, Q.; Bao, Y.; Min, J.; Chen, Q. A Study on effects of satellite based AOD data assimilation on numerical forecast of haze. Acta Meteorol. Sin. 2018, 76, 104–116. [Google Scholar]
- Chen, J.; Jiang, B.; Bai, Y.; Xu, X.; Alatalo, J.M. Quantifying ecosystem services supply and demand shortfalls and mismatches for management optimisation. Sci. Total Environ. 2019, 650, 1426–1439. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Luukkanen, J.; Kaivo-oja, J.; Vähäkari, N.; O’Mahony, T.; Korkeakoski, M.; Panula-Ontto, J.; Vehmas, J.; Nguyen Quoc, A. Resource efficiency and green economic sustainability transition evaluation of green growth productivity gap and governance challenges in Cambodia. Sustain. Dev. 2019, 27, 312–320. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Trodahl, M.I.; Jackson, B.M.; Deslippe, J.R.; Metherell, A.K. Investigating trade-offs between water quality and agricultural productivity using the Land Utilisation and Capability Indicator (LUCI)–A New Zealand application. Ecosyst. Serv. 2017, 26, 388–399. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ouyang, Z.; Zheng, H.; Xiao, Y.; Polasky, S.; Liu, J.; Xu, W.; Wang, Q.; Zhang, L.; Xiao, Y.; Rao, E.; et al. Improvements in ecosystem services from investments in natural capital. Science 2016, 352, 1455–1459. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Viña, A.; Mcconnell, W.J.; Yang, H.; Xu, Z.; Liu, J. Effects of conservation policy on China’s forest recovery. Sci. Adv. 2016, 2, e1500965. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Castillo-Eguskitza, N.; Martín-López, B.; Onaindia, M. A comprehensive assessment of ecosystem services: Integrating supply, demand and interest in the Urdaibai Biosphere Reserve. Ecol. Indic. 2018, 93, 1176–1189. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Schirpke, U.; Egarter Vigl, L.; Tasser, E.; Tappeiner, U. Analyzing spatial congruencies and mismatches between supply, demand and flow of ecosystem services and sustainable development. Sustainability 2019, 11, 2227. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Delang, C.O.; Wang, W. Chinese forest policy reforms after 1998: The case of the natural forest protection program and the slope land conversion program. Int. For. Rev. 2013, 15, 290–304. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Costanza, R. Ecosystem services: Multiple classification systems are needed. Biol. Conserv. 2008, 141, 350–352. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yahdjian, L.; Sala, O.E.; Havstad, K.M. Rangeland ecosystem services: Shifting focus from supply to reconciling supply and demand. Front. Ecol. Environ. 2015, 13, 44–51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Schröter, M.; Stumpf, K.H.; Loos, J.; van Oudenhoven, A.P.; Böhnke-Henrichs, A.; Abson, D.J. Refocusing ecosystem services towards sustainability. Ecosyst. Serv. 2017, 25, 35–43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Inostroza, L.; Konig, H.J.; Pickard, B.; Zhen, L. Putting ecosystem services into practice: Trade-off assessment tools, indicators and decision support systems. Ecosyst. Serv. 2017, 26, 303–305. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Year | Province | Rice | Grains Other than Rice | Meat | Milk | Aquatic Products |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1995 | Heilongjiang | 4,699,000.00 | 20,822,000.00 | 303,874.00 | 566,729.00 | 252,900.00 |
Inner Mongolia | 396,000.00 | 10,158,000.00 | 373,926.60 | 372,700.00 | 47,644.00 | |
Jilin | 2,969,000.00 | 16,955,000.00 | 428,055.00 | 15,745.00 | 110,550.00 | |
Liaoning | 2,618,000.00 | 11,617,000.00 | 194,090.00 | 4986.00 | 194,364.00 | |
2010 | Heilongjiang | 18,439,000.00 | 31,689,000.00 | 1,069,393.00 | 2,924,437.00 | 399,700.00 |
Inner Mongolia | 748,000.00 | 20,834,000.00 | 1,702,486.00 | 2,958,309.00 | 113,804.00 | |
Jilin | 5,685,000.00 | 22,740,000.00 | 1,240,679.00 | 567,218.00 | 165,958.00 | |
Liaoning | 4,576,000.00 | 13,078,000.00 | 696,939.00 | 283,213.00 | 806,408.00 | |
2018 | Heilongjiang | 26,855,000.00 | 48,213,000.00 | 1,019,749.00 | 1,995,090.00 | 624,320.00 |
Inner Mongolia | 1,219,000.00 | 34,314,000.00 | 1,998,052.00 | 2,167,688.00 | 139,499.00 | |
Jilin | 6,463,000.00 | 29,864,000.00 | 638,504.00 | 197,283.00 | 234,090.00 | |
Liaoning | 4,180,000.00 | 17,744,000.00 | 1,097,863.00 | 326,058.00 | 838,107.00 |
Year | Grain | Vegetables | Edible Oil | Meat | Milk | Fishes | Fruits |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1995 | 97 | 116.47 | 7.11 | 23.65 | 14.36 | 9.2 | 44.96 |
2010 | 81.53 | 116.11 | 8.84 | 34.72 | 23.98 | 15.21 | 54.23 |
2018 | 127.2 | 96.1 | 9.6 | 35.1 | 21.9 | 11.4 | 52.1 |
Value | Absorption of SO2 | Absorption of NOX | Absorption of PM10 |
---|---|---|---|
Paddy field | 4500 | 3350 | 15,864.33 |
Dry farmland | 4500 | 3350 | 15,864.33 |
Woodland | 15,213 | 600 | 10,827.5 |
Grassland | 27,903 | 600 | 60 |
Waters | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Urban and Rural Construction land | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Unutilized land | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Time | Province | FS | WS | AS | FC | WC | AC |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1995 | Inner Mongolia | 8.19 | 89,382.77 | 183,759.67 | 4.22 | 6903.71 | 18,097.46 |
Liaoning | 14.60 | 73,166.75 | 63,107.64 | 13.53 | 15,129.91 | 4322.13 | |
Jilin | 20.47 | 72,685.98 | 95,085.60 | 7.94 | 13,624.57 | 5870.06 | |
Heilongjiang | 26.65 | 117,786.32 | 233,051.68 | 11.09 | 24,448.46 | 12,640.05 | |
2010 | Inner Mongolia | 20.02 | 81,337.92 | 182,406.18 | 4.31 | 12,589.50 | 20,303.49 |
Liaoning | 19.41 | 92,069.11 | 64,093.63 | 14.46 | 14,296.39 | 4949.42 | |
Jilin | 30.39 | 100,363.80 | 94,754.13 | 9.19 | 12,014.76 | 6105.15 | |
Heilongjiang | 54.53 | 127,831.54 | 230,040.34 | 12.71 | 32,513.39 | 12,866.87 | |
2018 | Inner Mongolia | 29.26 | 118,444.53 | 193,053.53 | 4.64 | 12,920.84 | 9678.37 |
Liaoning | 24.18 | 41,656.71 | 69,949.39 | 15.30 | 12,901.96 | 2986.92 | |
Jilin | 37.41 | 68,843.02 | 94,562.17 | 9.69 | 11,956.08 | 3282.50 | |
Heilongjiang | 78.72 | 168,890.46 | 213,877.14 | 13.05 | 34,356.03 | 6590.25 |
Industry | Proportion of Secondary Industry | Proportion of Tertiary Industry | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Year | 1995 | 2010 | 2018 | 1995 | 2010 | 2018 |
Inner Mongolia | 38.39% | 54.60% | 39.40% | 31.03% | 36.10% | 50.50% |
Liaoning | 51.14% | 54.10% | 39.60% | 35.90% | 37.10% | 52.40% |
Jilin | 42.57% | 52.00% | 42.50% | 29.73% | 35.90% | 49.80% |
Heilongjiang | 52.70% | 50.20% | 24.60% | 27.76% | 37.20% | 57.10% |
Time | 1995 | 2010 | 2018 |
---|---|---|---|
GDP | 1 | 1 | 1 |
SCRE_FOOD | −0.750 ** (0.000) | −0.727 ** (0.000) | −0.704 ** (0.000) |
SCRE_WATER | −0.175 ** (0.007) | 0.021 (0.744) | −0.326 ** (0.000) |
SCRE_AIR | −0.127 (0.051) | −0.146 * (0.024) | −0.147 * (0.023) |
N | 238 | 238 | 238 |
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. |
© 2021 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Zhang, X.; Dong, L.; Huang, Y.; Xu, Y.; Qin, H.; Qiao, Z. Equilibrium Relationship between Ecosystem Service Supply and Consumption Driven by Economic Development and Ecological Restoration. Sustainability 2021, 13, 1486. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13031486
Zhang X, Dong L, Huang Y, Xu Y, Qin H, Qiao Z. Equilibrium Relationship between Ecosystem Service Supply and Consumption Driven by Economic Development and Ecological Restoration. Sustainability. 2021; 13(3):1486. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13031486
Chicago/Turabian StyleZhang, Xianghua, Lingbo Dong, Yingli Huang, Yanli Xu, Huiyan Qin, and Zhenhua Qiao. 2021. "Equilibrium Relationship between Ecosystem Service Supply and Consumption Driven by Economic Development and Ecological Restoration" Sustainability 13, no. 3: 1486. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13031486
APA StyleZhang, X., Dong, L., Huang, Y., Xu, Y., Qin, H., & Qiao, Z. (2021). Equilibrium Relationship between Ecosystem Service Supply and Consumption Driven by Economic Development and Ecological Restoration. Sustainability, 13(3), 1486. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13031486