Next Article in Journal
Funding Campus Sustainability through a Green Fee—Estimating Students’ Willingness to Pay
Next Article in Special Issue
Applications of Biocatalysts for Sustainable Oxidation of Phenolic Pollutants: A Review
Previous Article in Journal
Mobile Augmented Reality Heritage Applications: Meeting the Needs of Heritage Tourists
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Assessment of Cubic Equations of State: Machine Learning for Rich Carbon-Dioxide Systems

1
Chemical Engineering Department, Faculty of Engineering & Informatics, University of Bradford, Bradford BD7 1DP, UK
2
Department of Chemical Sciences, Bernal Institute, University of Limerick, Limerick V94 T9PX, Ireland
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Sustainability 2021, 13(5), 2527; https://doi.org/10.3390/su13052527
Submission received: 24 January 2021 / Revised: 15 February 2021 / Accepted: 20 February 2021 / Published: 26 February 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Sustainable Hydrocarbon Processing)

Abstract

Carbon capture and storage (CCS) has attracted renewed interest in the re-evaluation of the equations of state (EoS) for the prediction of thermodynamic properties. This study also evaluates EoS for Peng–Robinson (PR) and Soave–Redlich–Kwong (SRK) and their capability to predict the thermodynamic properties of CO2-rich mixtures. The investigation was carried out using machine learning such as an artificial neural network (ANN) and a classified learner. A lower average absolute relative deviation (AARD) of 7.46% was obtained for the PR in comparison with SRK (AARD = 15.0%) for three components system of CO2 with N2 and CH4. Moreover, it was found to be 13.5% for PR and 19.50% for SRK in the five components’ (CO2 with N2, CH4, Ar, and O2) case. In addition, applying machine learning provided promise and valuable insight to deal with engineering problems. The implementation of machine learning in conjunction with EoS led to getting lower predictive AARD in contrast to EoS. An of AARD 2.81% was achieved for the three components and 12.2% for the respective five components mixture.
Keywords: equation of state (EoS); carbon capture systems (CCS); machine learning; fluid package selection equation of state (EoS); carbon capture systems (CCS); machine learning; fluid package selection

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Truc, G.; Rahmanian, N.; Pishnamazi, M. Assessment of Cubic Equations of State: Machine Learning for Rich Carbon-Dioxide Systems. Sustainability 2021, 13, 2527. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13052527

AMA Style

Truc G, Rahmanian N, Pishnamazi M. Assessment of Cubic Equations of State: Machine Learning for Rich Carbon-Dioxide Systems. Sustainability. 2021; 13(5):2527. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13052527

Chicago/Turabian Style

Truc, George, Nejat Rahmanian, and Mahboubeh Pishnamazi. 2021. "Assessment of Cubic Equations of State: Machine Learning for Rich Carbon-Dioxide Systems" Sustainability 13, no. 5: 2527. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13052527

APA Style

Truc, G., Rahmanian, N., & Pishnamazi, M. (2021). Assessment of Cubic Equations of State: Machine Learning for Rich Carbon-Dioxide Systems. Sustainability, 13(5), 2527. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13052527

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop