1. Introduction
Streets play an intensely significant role in urban life. It is not only the main carrier of traffic and transportation, but also an urban open space promoting recreation, communication and interaction among citizens [
1]. However, with the rapid development of urbanization and the expansion of urban scales, “car-oriented” concepts have been the mainstream in street and city design, resulting in the enhancement of traffic functions and dampening the social functions of streets. A host of urban problems arise such as traffic congestion, environmental pollution and noise interference [
2]. How to effectively solve these problems, improve the quality of urban street space and build a livable city with stronger street vitality have dominated research in current urban renewal and development.
As early as the beginning of the 20th century, the discussion on the factors affecting the vitality of streets had already emerged. Some scholars agree that a vital street should have the following attributes of short length, high pedestrian density, mixed land use, buildings with diverse social functions, compact layout, small pedestrian scales and appropriate building densities, to name a few [
3,
4]. Other contemporary researchers introduce that the influential factors of street vitality may be inclusive of detailed texture, scalable humanity, mixed function and good street connectivity [
5]. Gehl [
6] also specifically analyzed the impact of mixed function, slow traffic and open space on street vitality through social research methods. Unfortunately, these studies are limited by the research conditions at that time and it is arduous to obtain data with strong temporal and spatial features, exceeding amount and high precision. Therefore, most of the above viewpoints are discussed in a qualitative analysis and insufficiently verified by quantitative and in-time empirical data.
Since the quintessential research studies fall short in obtaining big data, few quantitative empirical research studies are indicative of the vitality of streets whereby a multitude of street elements are employed. Most of the proposed methods involve expert scoring, questionnaire surveys or field investigation. In quite a few representative studies, Systematic Pedestrian and Cycling Environmental Scan (SPACES) and Pedestrian Environment Data Scan (PEDS) methods have been applied to conduct field surveys concerning walking and cycling environments [
7,
8]. First-hand data were obtained from photographic records and manual investigations combined with expert scoring and weight assignment methods for quantitative research on the urban space construction, walkability and livability of environments [
9]. The functions of two distinct types of streets in Cardiff, UK, were evaluated through the method of all-weather time-lapse videos [
10]. In addition, scholars have utilized field investigations and observation methods to perform detailed field surveys on a set of urban living streets. They manually counted street data to analyze the impact of commercial space and interface characteristics on pedestrians’ stay activities [
11]. GPS data and spatial syntax were applied to study the relationship between street space and residents’ behavior on an urban micro-scale [
12]. These studies are time-consuming, arduous for obtaining data and have a heavy workload. In 2014, the University of Vermont published a research paper on urban planning based on spatial data and spatial analysis methods to measure the livability of street landscapes. It signified major progress in the field of urban and street design, as well as a milestone in the field of urban quantitative analysis [
13].
With the advent of the new era of Internet technology, big data have become a hot spot for academic research and practical activities in various industries. The new data environment overcomes the limitations of traditional research. Scholars have performed a series of more refined scale quantitative studies on urban streets with new data and new technologies [
14]. Some scholars took 37 high-walkability neighborhoods in New York as study cases and used street landscape pictures to evaluate the beauty of the neighborhood environment and some other physical space indicators [
15]. Some scholars used multiple linear regression models to analyze the walking activity data of 9571 street survey locations and explore the relationship between different physical environments and street life (walking activities) in Seoul. The results show that the physical environmental facilities are important factors to improve the overall vitality of urban streets [
16]. Some scholars applied large-scale travel demand survey data and a Normalized Difference Vegetation Index (NDVI) obtained from remote sensing infrared wave images combined with Special Design Network Analysis (SDNA), a space syntax software to establish a model to verify the correlation between pedestrian travel probability and street vegetation density or street connectivity [
17]. Researchers used social network check-in data to display real-time urban population heat maps through nuclear density analysis [
18]. Utilizing image segmentation technology to segment is utilized to extract the street elements of landscapes for vitality analysis [
19]. These studies show that the data augmentation design triggered by the new data environment makes possible many studies that can hardly be completed by traditional methods. Furthermore, there is still much room for further research on the quantitative exploration of street vitality.
The rest of the work is outlined as follows. A literature review of street space vitality is presented in
Section 2. The research methodology, area and applied data are introduced in
Section 3 as well as the construction of the evaluation index system and quantitative analysis.
Section 4 concludes the analysis results, followed by the discussion and limitations as provided in
Section 5. Conclusions are given in
Section 6.
2. Literature Review
Street vitality can be interpreted from two dimensions: street and vitality. Streets are distinct from roads in their concept and function. Roads mainly perform the traffic function, while streets are more closely related to a citizen’s life. Urban streets are regarded as public places for entertainment, communication and interaction and mainly emphasize the social function [
20]. The concept of “vitality” has different definitions in the academic works of scholars. Some scholars argue that the activities between people, the interweaving process of living places as well as the diversity of urban life provide vitality to a city [
3]. Some scholars agree that vitality refers to pedestrians and various activities on the street [
5], and some scholars suggest that it is difficult to balance economic and social vitality in many cases. Fast traffic is the embodiment of economic vitality, while slow traffic means a vitalized city [
6]. Mehta [
21] proposes that a dynamic street is one in which a large number of people participate in a series of fixed or continuous activities, especially social activities. In China, some scholars suggest that street vitality is an external manifestation of social vitality in urban vitality, and its main manifestation is citizens’ several walking-based activities on the street [
22]. Long Y and Zhou Y [
1] propose that the vitality of a street is mainly reflected in its social vitality, and the physical space environment of the street cannot form vitality but only provides a place for citizens’ activities and has a certain impact on their activities. The core of street vitality is that people engage in various activities on the street and their activities have interactions that generate a sense of social belonging. Street vitality in this work is indicated by crowds of pedestrians in a street and is indicative of the extent to which the built environment of the street can attract people to walk and the extent to which citizens’ social needs such as communication, shopping, walking and entertainment can be met.
At present, relevant studies on the vitality of street spaces mainly focus on four facets: the built environment of streets, the walkability index of streets, the quality of street spaces and the quantification of street vitality. Research on the built environment of streets mainly examines the built environment factors that affect citizens’ choice of walking. As an example, in the study of Cauwenberg et al. [
23], 60 elderly participants were invited to rate the degree of motivation to travel according to street panorama pictures, and the environmental factors that motivate the elderly to travel on foot were explored. The results found that environmental factors such as vegetation, benches and sidewalks have significant positive correlations with the walking traffic of the elderly, and a comfortable, safe and pleasant environment can attract the elderly to walk to the most extent. Rania et al. [
24] conducted a longitudinal study on how different community environments affect citizens’ walking behavior and analyzed the relationship between community walking ability and practical walking. The authors concluded that when people are exposed to a stronger walking ability community, their practical walking trips will increase. Other scholars selected five environmental attributes of residential density, intersection density, number of local destinations, sidewalk availability and public transportation accessibility and calculated their correlations with the Walk Score. The results showed that the intersection density and the number of local destinations are highly related [
25]. Some scholars used exploratory factor analysis methods to analyze the impact of the built environment such as vehicle space, street interface enclosure, street environment and pedestrian space on pedestrian walking experience. The findings demonstrate that these four factors all have significant impacts on pedestrians’ walking experience, and this experience is determined by the results of the comprehensive effect of the relevant street environment characteristics [
26]. In addition, some scholars have taken residential areas as the objects of case studies. It was concluded that the environmental factors that have a greater impact on residents’ walking travel within a 15-min living circle include branch road density, balanced distribution of intersections, diversity of facilities and good accessibility [
27].
Research on the walkability index of streets highlights the Walk Score of the study area or the exploration of the relationship between Walk Score and walkability. Some scholars conducted research on the evaluation ability of the walkability index in several geographical locations and spatial scales of metropolitan areas in the United States, and they propose that there is a great correlation between the walkability index and the main indicators of community walkability [
28]. Some scholars compared four different walking ability indices on the same sample and examined the correlation between walking ability indices and family travel behavior by controlling factors such as individuals, families and travel characteristics. The results suggest that for non-work travel purposes, most walking ability indices are highly correlated with walking behavior, but the correlation is distinctive among individuals and families [
29]. Other scholars examined 115 communities in Washington, DC, USA, using the mean deviation between the walkability and the city index to test whether the relationship between the two indices is consistent in communities with different income levels. It was suggested that the “pedestrian paradise” in high-income communities is more suitable for walking than that in low-income communities [
30]. Wang De et al. [
31] discuss the influence of the layout of community daily service facilities on pedestrian travel and argue that the frequency of use, diversity and the law of distance attenuation are the main factors affecting the walkability of the community. Zhou Y and Long Y [
32] simplify the calculation method of Walk Score and add more street environmental impact factors to comprehensively evaluate the walkability of streets in districts of Chengdu. The results show that the residential streets have the highest walkability.
Studies on the quality of street spaces mainly evaluate factors affecting the quality of street space and screen the indices based on pedestrians. For instance, Banerjee [
33] suggests that the evaluation of space quality should include two major elements: material and social. Material elements include characteristics such as type, scale, facility, and microclimate of the space while social factors include equality of rights, social tolerance and management level. Pikora et al. [
7] established a quality evaluation system of street slow traffic space including five dimensions of function, safety, aesthetics, nature of land use and subjective evaluation. Some scholars measured the design quality of urban streets based on five physical characteristics of external representation, enclosure, human scale, transparency and complexity [
34]. Some scholars analyzed the relationship between space quality and built environment according to the characteristics of walking activities in commercial streets and identified the factors that affect the quality of street space activities, such as street green space, high-quality building facade, block mode of narrow and dense road network, historical buildings and comfortable space scale [
35]. Some researchers selected historical and cultural blocks as the main objects and combined them with street landscape maps to build an evaluation system from three dimensions of the material elements of street space, the perception elements and the connotation of historical and cultural blocks to evaluate the quality of street space [
36].
The quantitative research of street vitality mainly focuses on case analysis to explore the influencing factors of street vitality. For example, Sung et al. [
37] selected Seoul as the research object and constructed multilevel regression models with walking activity as the dependent variable. The results show that the overall walking activity in Seoul is related to six factors of built environment at the micro-level: land use mix, density, block size, building age, accessibility and border vacuums. Sugie et al. [
38] chose three major commercial streets in Seoul to discuss their street-scale thermal environments and analyzed the thermal characteristics of various physical elements on urban streets using thermal imaging cameras. The results show that street trees are the most effective mitigation element for reducing surface temperatures, which can enhance the walking comfort of pedestrians. Xu et al. [
39] selected streets built in nine different communities in old, main and new urban areas in Nanjing, China, and proposed a framework to assess street vitality considering different time dimensions and selected 10 subfactors under the factors of street form, street business and street accessibility for quantitative calculations. The authors conclude that in different time dimensions, street vitality in new urban areas is lower as compared with old and main urban areas. Khaled et al. [
40] assessed the walking ability of two urban communities on the main islands of Abu Dhabi in the hot arid region. The survey results show that walking is a widely used form of non-motorized transportation for both leisure and utilitarian purposes among blue-collar employees working in the service and retail sectors. Moreover, many respondents said that the change of weather is the main reason for discomfort when walking. Some domestic scholars analyzed the constituent elements of street vitality based on street urbanism. For instance, Long and Zhou [
1] used mobile phone signaling data to conduct quantitative exploration on streets in Chengdu to analyze the relationship between the external representation and constituent factors of various types of street vitality. Furthermore, on the basis of Chengdu street research, Hao et al. [
41] performed empirical research on street vitality in Beijing and added the spatial syntax index system to improve the interpretation of street vitality. Huang [
20] established a quantitative evaluation system of street vitality and applied a quantitative study on Wuhan city. Through a multiple linear regression analysis, he explored the relationship between the external characteristics and constituent factors of street vitality. It is suggested that function density, function mixing degree and development intensity around the street significantly affect the formation of street vitality, and the factors of street spaces themselves, such as network density and street width, also affect their vitality.
Concluding the previous research on the vitality of street spaces, it evidences that a host of classic documents have laid the theoretical and empirical foundation in the research field. Relationships among the built environment, citizens’ travel behavior and social life influences are investigated adequately. With the development of citizens’ demand for better quality of life and the innovation of technology, the social function and quality of streets have significantly drawn much attention. In addition, under the new data environment of rich data sources and sufficient empirical cases, the shortcomings of traditional research methods are likely to be overcome. Related research on street vitality has gradually adopted the application of big data for quantitative analysis. Quantitative research methods are constantly innovating, whereby the quantitative analysis literature is also enriching.
5. Discussion
Urban streets are the public open space of the city, performing their social function of transportation to the traditional extent, and also provide space for citizens’ daily leisure, fitness and social activities such as communication and information exchange in communities. The vitality of streets indicates the vitality of a community and also has close relationships and strong implications with city sustainability indices such as walkability, healthy lifestyle and living happiness, etc. Street vitality in this work is indicated by pedestrian crowds in the streets and is indicative of the extent to which the built environment of a street can attract people to walk there and to what extent citizens’ social needs such as communication, shopping, walking and entertainment can be met. The improvement of street vitality is crucial to promoting healthier public lifestyles, creating sustainable communities, improving closer social communications and accelerating social development.
Research on street vitality has been conducted by many scholars and the relationship among street vitality and built environment and street users (pedestrians) has been constantly explored. The results in many studies show that street vitality is related to functional diversity, traffic accessibility, road connectivity, street texture and related characteristics of the street itself (length/width/grade/speed limit and greening conditions on both sides of the road). It is suggested that the pedestrian density in a street should be increased through reasonable layout of land use function within the block, division of street scale and design of building interfaces on both sides of the street so as to realize the improvement of street vitality [
3]. Limited by the research conditions at that time, most of these studies are based on qualitative analysis and lack quantitative data validation. Nowadays, more precise data on the micro-level of the city are accessible, so the quantitative analysis of street vitality is no longer limited by the difficulty of data acquisition, and scholars have begun to perform more in-depth quantitative exploration on street vitality. It is concluded that the overall walking activity is related to six factors of built environment at the micro-level: land use mix, density, block size, building age, accessibility and border vacuums [
37]. It is discussed that the main factors affecting the vitality of the streets include the distance from the subway entrance or commercial center, function density, function mixing degree, development intensity and road network density [
1,
20]. Crucial elements from these studies constitute the draft version of the index system in this paper. Their independency and contributions are interpreted afterwards.
This paper selected some streets of Zhoujiadu Community in Shanghai and constructed a quantitative evaluation index system of street vitality from the two dimensions of external representation and constituent factors. Pearson correlation coefficients were used to explore the degree of correlation between constituent factors and street vitality, and a multiple linear regression model was established to discuss the main influencing factors of street vitality. The results from this work propose that the constituent factors of function density, function mixing degree, distance from the nearest subway station and green view all have impacts on street vitality.
First, a higher degree of function density and function mixing degree enhance the vitality of streets. If the number of facilities and service points along a street is large, their types are diverse and functions are comprehensive, the street can meet most people’s daily needs. Therefore, properly increasing the number and diversity of POIs along streets not only raise the attractiveness to pedestrians but also invites people with different travel purposes, increasing pedestrian crowds in the street as a result. Take Changli Road 2 and East Changli Road 4 for example (
Figure 15)—they are typical commercial streets with abundant facilities (covering catering, commerce, shopping, medical treatment, entertainment, transportation and education services). The crowd vitality of the streets is high. Conversely, the number of POIs on both sides of Liuhe Road (
Figure 15) is small, its daily service function is poor and its overall street vitality is also slightly inferior.
Secondly, highly efficient and convenient public transportation accessibility is an important indicator for street vitality. If the distance between a street and a subway station or bus station is short and, thus, the degree of transportation convenience is high, people would prefer walking and taking public transport for daily activities. In this study, there are more subway stations near Shangnan Road 4 and Shangnan Road 3, resulting in the better public transportation convenience of these streets. It is more possible for nearby residents to choose to walk for daily activities and commuting. Setting more public transport stations along streets tends to create higher street vitality.
Last but not least, a good street walking environment will increase the frequency of street use of pedestrians and naturally enhance the vitality of the street. The quality of the walking environment mainly depends on the degree of green plants on both sides of the streets. Streets with a high green view often have better walking environment quality and are more likely to provide people with a comfortable travel experience. Take the examples in
Figure 15. Changli Road 2 not only has a large number of facilities but also has a high greening rate on both sides, which effectively improves the walking environment. Dezhou Road 1, adjacent to a primary school and health service centers, injects more efforts into the construction of a green environment, resulting in a strong attraction of pedestrians, while in the case of Bailianjing Road 1 leading to the industrial wharf, and there are basically no roadside trees planted on both sides, the walking environment is poor for people. South Yanggao Road 1 is a sub-trunk road with a width of 50 m and eight two-way lanes. It is a major traffic road, and the daily traffic is dominated by vehicles. The green view on both sides of the street is low, and it is relatively less attractive for people to walk.
6. Conclusions
Under the new data environment, this work aimed to perform quantitative explorations of street vitality with the application of open data of maps of road networks, POIs, Baidu heat maps and Baidu panoramas as well as the adoption of the geoinformation software of ArcMap® 10.2 and the programming language Python®. The basic study unit was a small-scale urban public street area. From the theoretical perspective, we derived arguments from the basic framework of street urbanism and then constructed a quantitative evaluation index system for measuring street vitality. Afterwards, we established a multiple linear regression model to examine the main influencing factors of street vitality, so as to provide supports for the improvement of street space quality and the development of higher vitality streets. The empirical results of the Zhoujiadu Community in Shanghai evidence that the indices of social function density, social function mixing degree, distance from the nearest subway station and green view all have strong impacts on street vitality. Among them, the social function density and function mixing degree have the most significant influences. From the practical perspective, the research results from this work are beneficial in encouraging slow traffic in urban regions, improving the quality of urban streets and guiding the construction of livable cities with stronger street vitality. Compared with the arduous work of changing the physical embedded features of streets, it might be more realistic to enhance the vitality of streets by improving the social function density and social function mixing degree of the streets. A host of facilities with various types and services provided can attract people for more walking opportunities, enhance the walking friendliness of the built environment and elevate the vitality of the crowd in the street. Appropriately strengthening the planning of basic public transportation infrastructure in the context of street design can enhance the convenience for people to walk to public transportation stations. Planting more roadside trees on both sides of the broad street can create a more beautiful and comfortable walking space for people.
The overall framework of the methodology and analysis process can be replicated and applied in other communities with proper adjustments of details. The actual built environment and inherent facilities of each community are distinct, whereby possible addition to or deletion of the current constituent factors so as to obtain the evaluation index system may be performed. The methodology framework and the results presented in this work can provide some significant implications on street vitality and healthy community lives. Meaningful insights from this work can also be provided for current urban construction and regeneration and urban sustainability development.