Next Article in Journal
Supervisor Knowledge Sharing and Employee Knowledge Sharing: The Moderating Roles of Learning Goal Orientation and Affective Organizational Commitment
Previous Article in Journal
Progress in Research on Sustainable Urban Renewal Since 2000: Library and Visual Analyses
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Experimental Study on the Thermal Behavior of Exterior Coating Textures of Building in Hot and Arid Climates

Bioclimatic Architecture and Environment Laboratory ABE, University Constantine 3, Constantine 25000, Algeria
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Sustainability 2021, 13(8), 4175; https://doi.org/10.3390/su13084175
Submission received: 19 February 2021 / Revised: 14 March 2021 / Accepted: 2 April 2021 / Published: 9 April 2021

Abstract

:
The building envelope is the barrier between the interior and exterior environments. It has many important functions, including protecting the interior space from the climatic variations through its envelope materials and design elements, as well as reduction of energy consumption and improving indoor thermal comfort. Furthermore, exterior building sidings, in addition to their aesthetic appearance, can have useful textures for reducing solar gains and providing good thermal insulation performance. This research examined and evaluated the effect of external siding texture and geometry on energy performance. For this objective, a field in situ testing and investigation of surface temperature was carried out on four samples (test boxes) with different exterior textures and different orientations, under the climate zone of Constantine–Algeria during the summer period. The results indicated significant dependability between the exterior texture geometry, the percentage of shadow projected, and external surface temperature. The second part of the research involved a similar approach, exploring the effect of three types of particles with the same appearance but with different thermal characteristics. It was concluded that the natural plant aggregates “palm particles” had the best performance, which contributed to a significant reduction of external surface temperature reaching 4.3 °C, which meant decreasing the energy consumption.

1. Introduction

Climate change is one of the most debated topics of the 21st century. The planet has experienced phenomena caused by this change, such as rising temperatures, heat waves, rising sea levels, more intense storms, and forest fires. Since 1930, Over 100,000 new chemical compounds have been developed, and there has been missing information on the health assessment of such chemicals, of which a large portion are used in construction products. For example, Portland cement concrete, which is the most widely used material on the planet (10,000 million tons/year, and which, in the next 40 years, will increase by about 100%), contains chemicals used to modify their properties, fresh or hardened, whose effects on health and the environment are not yet fully understood [1].
The building envelope is an outer skin enclosure that can exclude unwanted effects while admitting desirable ones; it plays a crucial role in improving building energy efficiency and indoor comfort for the occupants. The choice of the external envelope is the first issue to be considered in the building energy-saving design. The next decision is to determine the suitable exterior cladding material and texture for optimizing energy efficient. These elements come in diverse categories (slate, brick, cement, plaster, marble, painting.) used for covering outside, consolidating, protecting, or decorating walls. These can also influence the energy consumption and improve indoor thermal comfort through their texture. To approach this research, we will review the three primary related areas: external coating, self-shading, coating colors, and smart kinetic coating. A number of studies discuss traditional brick properties and patterns.
The thermal design of the building envelope is optimized in order to pursue two objectives: the minimization of primary energy demand for the annual space conditioning and the minimization of thermal discomfort hours.
Ascione et al. [2] presented a study on external coating of the building envelope for two different cities, Naples and Istanbul, characterized by Mediterranean climates, in order to minimize the annual energy demand and maximize indoor comfort. The research explored different thermal properties of the coating, such as their aptitude to absorb or reflect the solar radiation, the infrared emission of the insulation, and the density and thickness of the masonry layers. The results in general showed that cool colors and cool materials were always suitable for hot climates, and peculiarly, the insulation of the walls should be high but not excessive. The high-reflective coating was also useful and reflected solar radiation, improving the cooling demand. Similarly, Yuxuan et al. [3] studied the energy saving performance of thermochromic coatings with different colors for buildings in Shanghai. It was observed that the surface temperature of thermochromic coatings was lower than the ordinary coating during cooling period and higher than the ordinary coating during heating period. The results indicate that thermochromic coatings have better energy saving effects, especially for areas with hot summers and cold winters. Ibrahim et al. [4] studied the thermal performance of exterior walls covered with a silica-aerogel-based coating. The results of this study showed that, for most of the cases studied, the aerogel-based coating showed better performance than other coating materials. Gagliano et al. [5] studied synergistic effects of thermal mass and natural ventilation on the thermal behavior of traditional massive buildings in Italy; the results highlighted that the massive envelope of traditional buildings helped in maintaining small fluctuations of indoor temperature. This research also indicated that, for a Mediterranean climate, the increase in thermal insulation does not always induce positive effects on the thermal performance in summer, and that it might even produce an increase in the heat loads due to the transmission through the envelope. Joudi et al. [6], in turn, studied the use of reflective exterior coatings to improve the thermal performance of buildings through different scenarios with reflective coatings. The results showed a correlation between the energy efficiency of the building and reflective coatings. Khadraoui et al. [7] evaluated the impact of coating in the form of a ventilated façade on thermal comfort in arid areas. The study showed that the building with this system was more efficient than a reference building. The arrangement of terracotta elements is very effective as a multifunctional envelope, serving to protect the building, increasing its energy performance, and improving its aesthetic appearance.
Several studies have also evaluated the thermal performance of exterior coatings through self-shading walls. In Israel, Capeluto [8] studied the energy performance of a self-shading building envelope; the results revealed that, for all the orientations, there was an important improvement in the energy performance of the building, particularly for east and west orientations. Other research, conducted by Alhuwayil et al. [9], studied the impact of an external shading strategy on the energy performance of building in hot-humid climates; the results showed that the proposed shading could save the annual energy consumption of the building by 20.5% compared to the base case. The payback period for the additional investment required for incorporating the self-shading strategy is estimated to be 2 years. Liu et al. [10], in turn, studied the impact of self-shading on buildings in Hong Kong; this study proposed the adoption of shading devices on opaque façades and evaluated their energy saving potentials in summer conditions. The results showed that, with the optimization of variables, such as the length, the number, and the angle of inclination of the shading panels on facades facing west, an energy saving potential up to 8.0% was possible. In other research, Kandar et al. [11] studied the influence of self-shading strategy of inclined walls on the energy performance of buildings in hot and humid climates. The results showed that the self-shading projection with an angle of more than 45 °C could reduce the heat gains of the building envelope; an optimization with an angle of 65 °C to the horizontal plane gave the best performance results, which led to a decrease in energy consumption. Merhan [12] studied the self-shading walls to improve environmental performance in desert buildings; the study aimed to present proposals to create shadows on opaque solid walls. The results showed that the self-shading wall strategy succeeded in reducing the outer surface temperature and incident solar radiation compared to the base case.
Other explorations have studied the effect of albedo on the external surface temperature, neglecting the texture of this colored face. Among these researchers, Mansouri et al. [13,14] evaluated the effect of the albedo in the exterior envelope on reducing the energy needs of buildings while varying the color. The results showed that the building envelope with a high albedo (0.9) recorded much lower values compared to the reference building with an albedo of (0.5). Bansal et al. [15], through an experimental study of samples, found that a black wall recorded a surface temperature 7 °C higher than a white wall during the hot period of the day, which means that the albedo plays a major role in determining the surface temperature. Taha et al. [16] carried out a study on exterior coatings characterized by high albedo. The results showed that, in summer, white elastomeric coatings were cooler than black elastomeric coatings. Coatings with high albedo in hot climates reduced the amount of incoming solar radiation and kept the building surfaces cool.
Other researchers are studying revolutionary technologies, such as phase-change materials, smart and kinetic envelopes, and design of a solar envelope, because their application improves building energy efficiency, which is a challenge that architects face today. The study by Tarabieh et al. [17] explored the impact of brick bond types on building energy. The brick wall models were classified into three cases: ¼ brick extrusion, ½ brick extrusion, and base case (smooth) for each brick bond (Running, English, and Flemish). The results showed that the Flemish bond case was the best performing, followed by the English bond. The percentage of extrusion seems to play a very important role in the results. Ben Bacha et al. [18] simulated the effect of shading devices on the building envelope with a kinetic system that actively reacted with weather conditions. The results obtained from this research showed that kinetic facades equipped with PV modules reduced direct radiation by 17.9%, which contributed to a decrease of indoor air temperature ranging between 4.0 °C to 4.8 °C. Other research, conducted by Ercan et al. [19], presented a parametric numerical simulation methodology. This study generated shading devices in the building envelope in hot and humid climates that could optimize daylight while blocking excessive solar heat gain. The design alternatives have been generated by scalable algorithms in accordance with daylight performance requirements. Research conducted by Nocera et al. [20] studied the adaptation of historic buildings reused as school buildings in order to optimize daylight; the results of this study proposed different technological and modernization solutions at the level of coating and built the envelope to improve visual comfort while respecting the cultural and historical value of the building heritage. Thus, these interventions can also be used in other regions of Europe with similar climatic conditions. Rodonò et al. [21], in turn, presented a method for the production of composite materials and their mechanical and physical characterization; the objective of this research was to create a new composite material that could be folded and unfolded easily in order to give lightweight solutions for exterior building envelopes.
In addition, several experimental studies were done using ecological, organic, or recycling components in the building envelope, in particular, using plant components such as palm particles, because of these thermal and volume characteristics. This material has been used as aggregate in concrete, in wall structures, and as thermal insulation, but has not been used as a component for exterior coating. Benmansour et al. [22] presented an investigation of new material, composed of natural cement, sand fibers, and date palm particles, in order to assess the usage possibilities of this new material as thermal insulation in the concrete. Several composites were prepared for different mass concentrations (from 0% to 30%). The results revealed that the incorporation of date palm particles, loading lower than 15%, satisfied both thermal and mechanical requirements of construction materials, and they could be used for wall structures. Other research done by Oushabi et al. [23] investigated the morphological and thermal properties of polyurethane composites reinforced with date palm particles as new ecological thermal insulation materials in buildings. The composites were prepared with different loadings; 5%, 10%, and 20%. The results showed that the mechanical and thermal performance of this new insulation was competitive with those of other insulators available in the market. From this investigation, it could be deduced that palm particles reduced the thermal conductivity of the composite while reducing its weight, and they could be used for wall structures. Thus, its use as filler in the mortar seems to be a very promising option, which allows it to be applied as a thermal insulation material. In another similar approach, Záleská et al. [24] studied the recycling of pneumatic waste (tire) mixed with cement concrete. The results indicate that the addition of these aggregates resulted in a decrease in weight, a deterioration of mechanical parameters, and a significant reduction in the thermal conductivity of concrete.
Based on the previous review, external coating plays a crucial role in improving building energy efficiency and indoor comfort for the occupants. Therefore, the choice of the external envelope is the first issue to be considered when making an energy saving building. In Algeria, the use of coating texture as a decorative element appears in a number of traditional architectural styles, especially in the southern part of the Algerian Desert, characterized by a hot and arid climate. In this part of Algeria, traditional buildings are built to cope with the harsh climatic conditions.
Therefore, the objective of this study is to evaluate the thermal behavior of the exterior walls with different coating textures inspired by traditional wall construction methods, as shown in Figure 1. Traditional construction used self-shading walls as a cooling strategy for reducing the amount of incoming solar radiation. Therefore, it is important to determine the suitable exterior wall cladding texture and material for optimizing energy efficient buildings for hot climates.

2. Materials and Methods

The overall approach methodology of this research is illustrated by Figure 2:
In this paper, the methodology we followed was based on the sequence of previous reviews. We started by studying the effect of wall texture geometry in decreasing the intensity of incoming long wave radiation in summer and lowering the external surface temperature. Then, another important motivation for upgrading the thermal characteristics of the investigated walls, we tried to incorporate natural particles (ecological, organic, waste, and recycling components) into exterior coating material. This research is beneficial for optimizing the thermal behavior of the building envelope in order to reduce energy use and provide comfort to occupants.
The present study consisted of two steps. The first series of measurements were carried out on four boxes with a one-meter dimension for each side (1 m3). After searching and investigating on the traditional texture in the south of Algeria [25,26], the choice was made on four types of textures, smooth texture (STB) as reference texture, rough texture (RTB), crystal texture (CTB), and blade texture (BTB), as shown in the Figure 3. This operation was developed with the presence and assistance of a qualified builder. At this stage, the material chosen for building the exterior wall coating was composed of cement mortar with a thickness of 30 mm. The boxes were first tested and some thermal measurements were done before laying any texture coatings in order to avoid any kind of mistake. The four samples were provided with insulation at roof and floor level; the thermal transmission was almost zero. The obtained results without coating were similar.
The second step of this research consisted of studying the effect of incorporating natural particles (ecological, organic, waste, and recycling components) into exterior coatings. After research and development in improving thermal performance of the exterior envelope of buildings, a variety of particles were tested, and the selection was made of three types with different thermal characteristics: Figure 4 shows a component from sand quarries, a component from ecological recycling (pneumatic waste), and a component obtained from collected date palm waste (palm particles). These waste materials were washed with distilled water to remove surface impurities and salt, then oven dried. These components were crushed and separated into different sizes, similar to the sand aggregate.
After many in situ test measurements, the choice was made on the palm particles, which showed the capacity to reduce the surface temperature more than the pneumatic waste aggregates. This choice was based on the ability to keep better thermal properties in order to reuse it as mortar aggregates in the manufacture of exterior coating textures. This material has been the subject of several research studies. It has shown high heat capacity due to its characteristics in reducing thermal conductivity, compressive strength, and weight reduction [22,23]. In addition, this material is widely available from date palms in the region of the great south of Algeria [27]. Figure 5 shows the surface temperature difference of the three samples.
In order to evaluate the thermal behavior of the exterior wall textures, three boxes with a rough texture of (1 m3) each were constructed separately: (RTB), (RTB1), and (RTB2). Each box was made with different concentrations of palm particle aggregates (0%, 30%, and 70%) respectively. Figure 6 shows the rough texture with different concentration of palm particles aggregate (0% and 30%) respectively.

Field Measurements and Instrumentation

In this experimental study, measurements were carried out in order to evaluate the thermal behavior of the exterior coating texture. This study was executed in Constantine city, situated in the northeast part of Algeria (latitude: 36.9126° N, longitude: 7.0213° E). Constantine is characterized by a hot and dry climate in summer. The experimental system (TEST BOX) was installed on a private garden in a cleared area, using different measuring instruments (FLIR type thermal camera—thermometers with connectable probe type (TESTO 925)) used for wall surface temperature. The external measurements were done by an (Oregon Scientific) type weather station used for collecting external climatic data and pyranometer (S-LIB-M003) with data logger (HOBO H21 USB). Figure 7 shows the scientific instruments used for in situ measurements.
The measurements for the first phase of this study were taken on 2019 during the summer from June 23 to June 30 (08 days), the longest days of the year, where the hottest days were recorded on June 25, 26, 27, 2019. During this period, the weather station (Oregon Scientific) was installed in proximity to the test boxes and recorded a maximum of air temperature (AT) reaching 48.2 °C at 1:00 pm, a minimum of humidity of 6%, and an atmospheric pressure around 646 hPa. The solar radiation on a vertical plane recorded by the pyranometer was around 361 (Wh/m2) at midday.
The second phase of measurements was done during the summer period of 2020, choosing the same period, from June 23 to June 30. The output data were recorded from 12 h (8:00 a.m.) to (8:00 p.m.) with an interval of 60 min. The maximum air temperature (AT) recorded by the weather station (Oregon Scientific) was around 44.6 °C at 2:00 pm. The solar radiation on a vertical plane recorded by the pyranometer was around 328 (W/m2) at midday.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Effect of Texture Geometry on Surface Temperature

The results of the measurements during the summer showed some variations in external surface temperature (EST) for the four different samples when compared with each another for all orientations. The results of the external surface temperature (EST) tested by (FLIR) thermal camera and (TESTO 925) are shown in the Figure 8, Figure 9, Figure 10 and Figure 11. We took the south facade as an example, showing the different textures, the projected shadow, and the surface temperature for the selected hours of the chosen investigation days:
As indicated in Figure 8, Figure 9, Figure 10 and Figure 11, the textures that represent the lowest value of the external surface temperature (EST) are the blade texture (BTB) and the crystal texture (CTB) during the summer period. It is important to determine the shadow fraction (SF), which is the ratio between the direct solar radiation received by any surface under the obstruction and the same surface fully exposed to direct solar radiation, because, in hot dry climates, minimization of solar radiation and increasing shade are desirable measures for reducing thermal stress.
At 9:00 a.m., the air temperature (AT) recorded by the weather station (Oregon Scientific) was 33.3 °C, the relative humidity was around 20%, and the solar radiation on a vertical plane recorded by the pyranometer was approximately 224 (W/m2). Meanwhile, the crystal texture represented the lowest value of external surface temperature (EST) = 28.5 °C. This was mainly caused by the texture and the size of shadowed area, with SF equal to 95% compared to the total surface of the wall, followed by the blade texture, EST = 29.5 °C with SF = 37% on the total surface of the wall. The most critical value was recorded at the rough texture (RTB), with EST = 38.2 °C, whether because of the shaded or exposed surface, it represented a greater percentage of shade than the blade texture.
This observation was made throughout the day. At midday, the air temperature (AT) recorded by the weather station (Oregon Scientific) was 46.3 °C, the relative humidity was around 9%, and the solar radiation on a vertical plane recorded by the pyranometer was approximately 377 (W/m2). Meanwhile, the lowest value of external surface temperature was recorded at the level of the blade texture (BTB), approximately 49.9 °C presenting a 41% SF, followed by the crystal texture (CTB), approximately 52.5 °C presenting 40% SF. The smooth texture (STB) marked a value of 54.7 °C, while the rough texture (RTB) always scored the highest value (EST) = 58.5 °C.
At 3:00 p.m., for example, the blade texture (BTB) recorded the lowest value of external surface temperature, (EST) = 49 °C with (SF) = 40%. Otherwise, the rough surface always recorded the most critical value, (EST) = 53.7 °C, which was higher compared to the smooth surface, (EST) = 51.2 °C, while the latter had been totally exposed to solar radiation. Meanwhile, the weather station (Oregon Scientific) recorded an air temperature (AT) of about 47.8 °C and a relative humidity of 06%. Thus, the solar radiation on a vertical plane recorded by the pyranometer was of the order of 156 (W/m2). On the basis of the obtained results, we deduced that there is a correlation between EST and SF. As mentioned in Figure 12, the rough texture (RTB) presented the lowest correlation compared to the other textures.
Table 1 shows the different results recorded for the external surface temperature for the four studied textures, considering all orientations.
Through these tables, we noticed that the most critical number of hours (in red) in the south orientation was much higher for the rough texture (RTB) (seven hours from 10:00 a.m.), followed by the smooth texture (STB) with a mean of five hours, then the other two types of texture (four hours). The hottest hours were recorded between 10:00 a.m. and 4:00 p.m.. The rough texture (RTB) always marked the highest number of hot hours.
Figure 13 represents a grouped histogram of the change in the SF of the southern facade in the four types of texture from 8:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m.:
Based on Figure 13, we noticed that, at midday, the percentage of SF on the south wall was the same (around 40%) for the three textures RTB, CTB, and BTB. By comparing the results of external surface temperature (EST) recorded at midday, we found that these values are of the order of 52.6 °C for the blade texture (BTB), 53.9 °C for the crystal texture (CTB), and 58.5 °C for rough texture (RTB), although all textures had the same percentage of SF. This can be explained by the fact that the rough texture (RTB) presented small spots of shadows not exceeding 1 cm2 and with random positions, which favored small reflections and absorption of solar radiation, unlike crystal (CTB) and blade (BTB) textures, which featured larger, more authentic shaded surfaces acting as small canopies that protected the wall itself.
The analysis and the comparison of the four textures are shown in Figure 14. The comparison of diagrams between each type of texture with the different orientations investigated (North, East, South, and West) will clarify and solidify the obtained results. The obtained results confirmed that the coating texture affected the external surface temperature, which in turn, plays an important role in improving building environments and reducing energy consumption.

3.2. Effect of Texture Particles on Surface Temperature

The results showed that the rough texture recorded the most critical results for the external surface temperature. As this texture is used for most building coating textures in Algeria, the improvement of its thermal behavior will be essential by adding new components favorable for the harsh climate of the region. This method was done by using natural aggregates, such as palm particles, to optimize the thermal efficiency of this texture. Figure 15 shows the external surface temperature (EST) obtained after adding the palm particles with different percentages to the rough wall texture.
The palm particle aggregate was added respecting different percentage, as explained in the Methodology section [16,17], starting with RTB of 100% sand aggregate, RTB1 of 30% palm particles and 70% sand aggregate, and finally, RTB2 of 70% palm particles and 30% sand aggregates, respectively.
Based on this diagram, we noticed that the highest external surface temperatures (EST) were recorded at the RTB reference coating level between 2:00 p.m. and 3:00 p.m., of which we note that the most critical value was recorded during the day of June 25: (EST) = 52.8 °C with a difference of 2.7 °C compared to RTB1 and 4.3 °C compared to RTB2.
These results prove that the use of palm particles in several densities can significantly reduce the external surface temperature (EST) at the level of the rough texture, of which we noticed a difference of EST up to 4.3 °C.

4. Conclusions

Natural cooling can be achieved by several strategies; in summer, shading is the most effective method to cool a building and reduces the cooling load in buildings. This study evaluated the effect of the wall texture coating in order to block the sun before it can get into the building, minimizing the short-wave solar radiation to decrease wall surface temperature. The experimental results report that there is a correlation between the texture geometry, the projected shadow percentage, and the surface temperature of the wall. The direct radiation has a big influence on surface temperature and conducts more heat to the building interior. This is well represented by rough texture, where the percentage of shading was lower and the surface temperature marked the highest values for the four studied orientations. However, crystal texture marked higher shading percentage and lower surface temperature, followed by the blade texture. The values of the wall surface temperature showed a considerable decrease after increasing the shading fraction, which caused a difference up to (5.4 °C) between the crystalline texture and the reference texture (smooth), and also had a difference of up to (9.5 °C) between the crystalline texture and the rough texture. Accordingly, the increase in the percentage of shading by the coating texture design can promote better results in lowering surface temperature; which has an impact in reducing the cooling requirements and increasing the thermal performance of the building.
For improving the studied walls efficiency and further reducing the cooling demand, the use of natural aggregates, such as palm particles with different concentrations, could provide significant advantages over sand aggregates used in the development of exterior coatings. The results showed that the use of palm particles as an exterior coating led to a surface temperature difference of up to (4.3 °C) compared to the reference texture. Therefore, using the right concentration of palm particles allows better surface temperature results in case they are mixed with adjuvants to avoid deterioration caused by weather conditions.
The future development of this experimental study is to establish further work that could include numerical simulations to assess the effect of exterior cladding texture on the thermal performance of walls. This survey opens up other research for different climatic zones of Algeria and other countries.
The present work falls within the framework of the preservation and enhancement of the building heritage in southern Algeria in order to contribute to the sustainable development of these regions characterized by a hot and arid climate.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, I.B.; methodology, I.B. and F.B.; validation, I.B. and F.B.; formal analysis, I.B. and F.B.; investigation, I.B.; resources, I.B.; data curation, F.B.; writing—original draft preparation, I.B. and F.B.; writing—review and editing, I.B. and F.B.; visualization, I.B.; supervision, F.B.; project administration, I.B.; funding acquisition, F.B. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Data are contained within the article. They are also available on request from the main and the corresponding authors.

Acknowledgments

We would like to acknowledge the Bioclimatic Architecture and Environment laboratory (ABE) at the University of Constantine 3, Algeria for the use of the equipment in this research and valuable support during the experiments. We would like also to acknowledge the Sustainable Building Design (SBD) Laboratory at the University of Liege for the use of the equipment in this research and valuable support during the experiments and data analysis. The authors would also like to thank the University of Constantine 3, Algeria and the Liege University, Belgium for their assistance in administrative procedures.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest. The funders had no role in the study’s design; in the collection, analysis, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript; or in the decision to publish the results.

Nomenclature

STBSmooth texture box
RTBRough texture box
CTBCrystal texture box
BTBBlade texture box
RTB1Rough texture box with 30% palm particles
RTB2Rough texture box with 70% palm particles
ATAir temperature (°C)
ESTExternal surface temperature (°C)
ISTInternal surface temperature (°C)
SRSolar radiation (W/m2)
SFShadow fraction
RCorrelation coefficient

References

  1. Pacheco-Torgal, F.; Jonkers, H.M.; Karak, N.; Ivanov, V. Introduction to biopolymers and biotech admixtures for eco-efficient construction materials. In Biopolymers and Biotech Admixtures for Eco-Efficient Construction Materials; Woodhead Publishing Edition: Cambridge, UK, 2016. [Google Scholar]
  2. Ascione, F.; Bianco, N.; De Masi, R.F.; Mauro, G.M.; Vanoli, G.P. Design of the Building Envelope: A Novel Multi-Objective Approach for the Optimization of Energy Performance and Thermal Comfort. Sustainability 2015, 7, 809. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  3. Yuxuan, Z.; Yunyun, Z.; Jianrong, Y.; Xiaoqiang, Z. Energy saving performance of thermochromic coatings with different colors for buildings. Energy Build. 2020, 215, 109920. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Ibrahim, M.; Biwole, P.H.; Wurtz, E.; Achard, P.A. Study on the thermal performance of exterior walls covered with a recently patented silica-aerogel-based insulating coating. Build. Environ. 2014, 81, 112–122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Gagliano, A.; Nocera, F.; Patania, F.; Moschella, A.; Detommaso, M.; Evola, G. Synergic effects of thermal mass and natural ventilation on the thermal behaviour of traditional massive buildings. Int. J. Sustain. Energy 2014, 35, 411–428. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Joudi, A.; Svedung, H.; Cehlin, M.; Rönnelid, M. Reflective coatings for interior and exterior of buildings and improving thermal performance. Appl. Energy 2013, 103, 562–570. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Khadraoui, M.; Sriti, L.; Merad, Y. l’impact de la façade ventilee sur le confort thermique et l’esthetique de l’enveloppe architecturale en zone. In Proceedings of the Xth International Congress on Renewable Energy and the Environment, Tunis, Tunisia, 23–25 March 2016. [Google Scholar]
  8. Capeluto, I.G. Energy performance of the self-shading building envelope. Energy and Build. 2003, 35, 327–336. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Alhuwayil, W.K.; Mujeebu, M.A.; Algarny, A.M.M. Impact of external shading strategy on energy performance of multi-story hotel building in hot-humid climate. Energy 2019, 169, 1166–1174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Liu, S.; Kwok, Y.T.; Lau, K.K.; Chan, P.W.; Ng, E. Investigating the energy saving potential of applying shading panels on opaque façades: A case study for residential buildings in Hong Kong. Energy Build. 2019, 193, 78–91. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Kandar, M.Z.; Nimlyat, P.S.; Abdullahi, M.G.; Dodo, Y.A. Influence of inclined wall self-shading strategy on office building heat gain and energy performance in hot humid climate of Malaysia. Heliyon 2019, 5, e02077. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Merhan, S. Self-Shading Walls to Improve Environmental Performance in Desert Buildings. Available online: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/338655646 (accessed on 20 April 2020).
  13. Mansouri, O.; Bourbia, F.; Belarbi, R. Influence de la réflectivité de l’enveloppe sur la demande énergétique des bâtiments et sur le confort thermique. Nat. Technol. J. 2018, Vol A, 33–42. [Google Scholar]
  14. Mansouri, O.; Bourbia, F.; Belarbi, R. Effect of urban albedo surfaces on thermal comfort. J. Fundam. Appl. Sci. 2017, 9, 878–896. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  15. Bansal, N.K.; Gargand, S.N.; Kothari, S. Effect of exterior surface colour on the thermal performance of buildings. Build. Environ. 1992, 27(1), 31–37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Taha, H.; Sailor, D.; Akbari, H. High Albedo Materials for Reducing Cooling Energy Use; Lawrence Berkeley Lab: Berkeley, CA, USA, 1992; Volume UC-530. [Google Scholar]
  17. Tarabieh, K.; Abdelmohsen, S.; Elghazi, Y.; El-Dabaa, R.; Hassan, A.; Amer, M. Parametric Investigation of Three Types of Brick Bonds for Thermal Performance in a Hot Arid Climate Zone. In DESIGN TO THRIVE, PLEA 2017 PROCEEDINGS; Engine Shed Tours: Bristol, UK, 2017; Volume III, pp. 3699–3706. [Google Scholar]
  18. Bacha, C.B.; Bourbia, F. Effect of kinetic façades on energy efficiency in office buildings—Hot dry climates. In Proceedings of the 11th Conference on Advanced Building Skins, Bern, Switzerland, 10–11 October 2016; pp. 458–468. [Google Scholar]
  19. Ercan, B.; Tahira, S.; Ozkan, E. Performance-based parametric design explorations: A method for generating appropriate building components. Design Stud. 2015, 38, 33–53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Nocera, F.; Lo Faro, A.; Costanzo, V.; Raciti, C. Daylight Performance of Classrooms in a Mediterranean School Heritage Building. Sustainability 2018, 10, 3705. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  21. Rodonò, G.; Sapienza, V.; Recca, G.; Carbone, D.C. A Novel Composite Material for Foldable Building Envelopes. Sustainability 2019, 11, 4684. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  22. Benmansour, N.; Agoudjil, B.; Gherabli, A.; Kareche, A.; Boudenne, A. Thermal and Mechanical Performance of Natural Mortar Reinforced with Date Palm Fibers for Use as Insulating Materials in Building. Energy Build. 2014, 81, 98–104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Oushabi, A.; Sair, S.; Abboud, Y.; Tanane, O.; El Bouari, A. An Experimental Investigation on Morphological, Mechanical and Thermal Properties of Date Palm Particles Reinforced Polyurethane Composites as New Ecological Insulating Materials in Building. Case Stud. Constr. Mater. 2017, 7, 128–137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Záleská, M.; Pavlík, Z.; Čítek, D.; Jankovský, O.; Pavlíková, M. Eco-Friendly Concrete with Scrap-Tyre-Rubber-Based Aggregate—Properties and Thermal Stability. Constr. Build. Mater. 2019, 225, 709–722. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Ravereau, A. Les Mzab une Leçon D’architecture; Sindbad: Paris, France, 1981. [Google Scholar]
  26. Donnadieu, P.; Didillon, H.; Didillon, J.M.; Donnadieu, C. Habiter le Désert; Mardaga Edition: Brussels, Belgium, 1977. [Google Scholar]
  27. Abdouche, F. Communication from the Botanic Unit Development at the Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Development; Algerian Press Service: Algiers, Algeria, 2010. [Google Scholar]
Figure 1. Traditional wall texture design in the great south of Algeria. (a: Ghardaia region)—(b: Timimoun region)—(c: Hoggar region)—(d: Taghit region). (Source: Authors, 2015).
Figure 1. Traditional wall texture design in the great south of Algeria. (a: Ghardaia region)—(b: Timimoun region)—(c: Hoggar region)—(d: Taghit region). (Source: Authors, 2015).
Sustainability 13 04175 g001
Figure 2. Conceptual Framework Study.
Figure 2. Conceptual Framework Study.
Sustainability 13 04175 g002
Figure 3. The selected textures for surface temperature measurements. (a) smooth texture (STB)—(b) rough texture (RTB)—(c) crystal texture (CTB)—(d) blade texture (BTB). (Source: by Authors, 2019).
Figure 3. The selected textures for surface temperature measurements. (a) smooth texture (STB)—(b) rough texture (RTB)—(c) crystal texture (CTB)—(d) blade texture (BTB). (Source: by Authors, 2019).
Sustainability 13 04175 g003
Figure 4. Evaluation of the thermal behavior of the tested aggregate. (a: sand aggregates)—(b: palm particles)—(c: tire waste). (Source: by Authors, 2020).
Figure 4. Evaluation of the thermal behavior of the tested aggregate. (a: sand aggregates)—(b: palm particles)—(c: tire waste). (Source: by Authors, 2020).
Sustainability 13 04175 g004
Figure 5. Surface temperature values of the three samples.
Figure 5. Surface temperature values of the three samples.
Sustainability 13 04175 g005
Figure 6. Rough texture with different concentration of palm particles aggregate.
Figure 6. Rough texture with different concentration of palm particles aggregate.
Sustainability 13 04175 g006
Figure 7. Scientific instruments used for in situ measurements.
Figure 7. Scientific instruments used for in situ measurements.
Sustainability 13 04175 g007
Figure 8. External surface temperature of the south orientation at (9:00 a.m.).
Figure 8. External surface temperature of the south orientation at (9:00 a.m.).
Sustainability 13 04175 g008
Figure 9. External surface temperature of the south orientation at midday.
Figure 9. External surface temperature of the south orientation at midday.
Sustainability 13 04175 g009
Figure 10. External surface temperature of the south orientation at (3:00 p.m.).
Figure 10. External surface temperature of the south orientation at (3:00 p.m.).
Sustainability 13 04175 g010
Figure 11. External surface temperature of the south orientation at (6:00 p.m.).
Figure 11. External surface temperature of the south orientation at (6:00 p.m.).
Sustainability 13 04175 g011
Figure 12. Correlation results of external surface temperature (EST) and shadow fraction (SF) for (a-RTB)—(b-CTB)—(c-BTB).
Figure 12. Correlation results of external surface temperature (EST) and shadow fraction (SF) for (a-RTB)—(b-CTB)—(c-BTB).
Sustainability 13 04175 g012
Figure 13. External surface temperature at midday compared to SF percentage (south orientation).
Figure 13. External surface temperature at midday compared to SF percentage (south orientation).
Sustainability 13 04175 g013
Figure 14. External surface temperature for all textures and orientations. (a: 9:00 a.m.)—(b: Midday.)—(c: 3:00 p.m.)—(d: 6:00 p.m.)
Figure 14. External surface temperature for all textures and orientations. (a: 9:00 a.m.)—(b: Midday.)—(c: 3:00 p.m.)—(d: 6:00 p.m.)
Sustainability 13 04175 g014
Figure 15. External surface temperature of rough textures made up of palm particles with different concentrations of aggregates.
Figure 15. External surface temperature of rough textures made up of palm particles with different concentrations of aggregates.
Sustainability 13 04175 g015
Table 1. External surface temperature for the listed orientations (North, East, South, West).
Table 1. External surface temperature for the listed orientations (North, East, South, West).
North East
Hours(STB)(RTB)(CTB)(BTB)Hours(STB)(RTB)(CTB)(BTB)
Sustainability 13 04175 i001 Sustainability 13 04175 i002 Sustainability 13 04175 i003 Sustainability 13 04175 i004 Sustainability 13 04175 i005 Sustainability 13 04175 i006 Sustainability 13 04175 i007 Sustainability 13 04175 i008
825.725.825.423.68404836.938.7
929.93229.627.8946.757.243.447.4
1033.839.933.636.51052.361.947.953.5
1138.440.938.337.4115258.950.353.6
124849.445.246.21254.558.255.356.4
1352.854.548.147.41357.958.452.155.8
1458.759.352.2511458.660.753.152.3
1551.653.35048.11550.253.348.848
1649.451.249.149.21647.848.34746
1746484444.41748444442.3
1844.446.442.742.11843.142.241.539.1
South West
Hours(STB)(RTB)(CTB)(BTB)Hours(STB)(RTB)(CTB)(BTB)
Sustainability 13 04175 i009 Sustainability 13 04175 i010 Sustainability 13 04175 i011 Sustainability 13 04175 i012 Sustainability 13 04175 i013 Sustainability 13 04175 i014 Sustainability 13 04175 i015 Sustainability 13 04175 i016
826.626.122.523.1825.528.823.524.5
933.838.228.530.1929.832.127.130.4
1041.550.139.837.91035.640.833.536.9
1145.15241.841.51140.240.336.741
1254.758.553.952.61244.649.550.547
1357.161.251.755.41354.158.249.755.4
1460.964.355.959.91464.168.857.260.3
1551.253.75049.7156066.157.558.8
1650.151.247.349.11659.16257.159.3
1745464244.11755.7575052
1842.345.54041.518505248.248.5
ESTSlighltly warmWarm HotVery hot
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Boukhelkhal, I.; Bourbia, F. Experimental Study on the Thermal Behavior of Exterior Coating Textures of Building in Hot and Arid Climates. Sustainability 2021, 13, 4175. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13084175

AMA Style

Boukhelkhal I, Bourbia F. Experimental Study on the Thermal Behavior of Exterior Coating Textures of Building in Hot and Arid Climates. Sustainability. 2021; 13(8):4175. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13084175

Chicago/Turabian Style

Boukhelkhal, Islam, and Fatiha Bourbia. 2021. "Experimental Study on the Thermal Behavior of Exterior Coating Textures of Building in Hot and Arid Climates" Sustainability 13, no. 8: 4175. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13084175

APA Style

Boukhelkhal, I., & Bourbia, F. (2021). Experimental Study on the Thermal Behavior of Exterior Coating Textures of Building in Hot and Arid Climates. Sustainability, 13(8), 4175. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13084175

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop